CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Non-CGIAR communities
    • Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) - archive
    • CTA Agritrade
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Non-CGIAR communities
    • Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation (CTA) - archive
    • CTA Agritrade
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    The World Bank again condemns subsidies

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
    Date Issued
    2003
    Language
    en
    Type
    News Item
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    CTA. 2003. The World Bank again condemns subsidies. Agritrade, February 2003. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52426
    External link to download this item: http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/February-2003
    Abstract/Description
    Speaking in Cairo, the World Bank Chief Economist Nicholas Stern described OECD...
    Notes
    Speaking in Cairo, the World Bank Chief Economist Nicholas Stern described OECD agricultural subsidies as 'sin'. He pointed out that the EU was a worse offender than the USA, and Japan was a worse offender than the EU. He was particularly critical of those who 'speak about the advantages of trade, about the advantages of liberalisation, about the advantages of markets and then close their markets or restrict access. Comment: Although these criticisms are to a degree justified, they miss the main point with regard to the current trajectory for agricultural reform in the EU. These reforms will allow the EU to progressively open up its markets to imports, but as a result of the level of direct aid payments being made, this will be at prices comparable to world market prices. This will greatly reduce the attractiveness of the EU market, particularly considering the high hygiene standards which ACP exporters will have to comply with. The question for the ACP is what value will preferential access hold when EU prices have been brought down to world market prices levels and EU production is being maintained (or even allowed to expand) on the basis of increased levels of direct aid support?
    Subjects
    MARKETING; TRADE;
    Regions
    ACP; Africa; Caribbean; Oceania
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
    Collections
    • CTA Agritrade [1158]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback