Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTechnical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-09T14:08:08Z
dc.date.available2015-01-09T14:08:08Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.citationCTA. 2002. EU criticises US farm bill. Agritrade, June 2002. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10568/52734
dc.descriptionIn a May 1st press release, EU Agriculture Commissioner Fischler criticised the new US farm bill as an unfortunate development, pointing out that 'at a time when all developed countries have accepted the direction of farm support away from trade and production distorting measures, the US is doing an about turn and heading in the opposite direction'. The Commissioner pointed out that as a result of the new bill the 'US WTO ceilings for production distorting expenditures will be breached'. Commissioner Fischler argued that the new US farm bill would result in over production and 'act as hidden export subsidies and depress domestic prices to block out imports'. Commissioner Fischler contrasted the US policy with the EU policy which, he argued, was reducing production distorting support and increasing the focus on 'food safety and quality, rural development, and environmental services for society at large.' Comment: The current dispute with the US highlights the dangers posed to ACP agriculture under the various reform programmes under way in the EU and the US. Commissioner Fischler, in condemning the US policy, chose his words carefully. EU policy is reducing what it terms 'production distorting support', that is to say aid to price support and is increasing less trade distorting forms of aid (direct aid to farmers) and aid to rural development (including financial assistance to greater value added processing). However in the sector where this is most advanced (cereals) this has not reduced EU production. On the contrary, despite an average 50% decline in cereal prices EU production of cereals has increased around 26%. Thus even the shift to less production distorting forms of aid has led to significantly larger volumes of EU production than one would expect. If, against this background, the US is increasing production distorting forms of aid, this can only be disastrous for those commodities on which ACP countries depend for exports and in which the US has a production interest.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn a May 1st press release, EU Agriculture ...en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCTAen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAgritrade, June 2002en_US
dc.sourceAgritradeen_US
dc.titleEU criticises US farm billen_US
dc.typeNews Itemen_US
cg.subject.ctaMARKETING AND TRADEen_US
cg.identifier.statusOpen Accessen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationTechnical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation
cg.fulltextstatusFormally Publisheden_US
cg.identifier.urlhttp://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2002/June-2002en_US
cg.placeWageningen, The Netherlandsen_US
cg.coverage.regionACPen_US
cg.coverage.regionAFRICAen_US
cg.coverage.regionCARIBBEANen_US
cg.coverage.regionPACIFICen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record