CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Virtual library on animal genetic resources
    • DAGRIS
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Virtual library on animal genetic resources
    • DAGRIS
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Effect of breed-type on carcass weight and composition in sheep

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Gaili, E.S.E.
    Date Issued
    1979-02
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Gaili, E.S.E. 1979. Effect of breed-type on carcass weight and composition in sheep. Tropical Animal Health and Production 11(4): 191-198.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/66943
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237800
    Abstract/Description
    The relative rate of increase in the carcass and its tissues with increasing empty body weight (EBW) or carcass weight respectively, was studied in male sheep from the Dorset Horn (29), Hampshire (21) and Sudan Desert sheep (31). The rate at which the carcass, muscle and bone increased in weight was the same in all breeds but the Sudan Desert sheep deposited fat at a slower rate than the other 2 breeds. At an equally adjusted EBW the Desert sheep had lighter carcass than the Dorset Horn or Hampshire sheep. Sudan Desert sheep had more bone than the other 2 breeds at an equally adjusted cold carcass weight or muscle plus bone weight. At an equally adjusted total carcass fat weight the Sudan Desert sheep had significantly (p
    AGROVOC Keywords
    sheep; breeds; carcass composition; meat yield
    Subjects
    SHEEP; BREEDS;
    Livestock breed types
    SUDAN DESERT
    Collections
    • DAGRIS [855]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback