CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Bioversity International
    • Bioversity Discussion/Working Papers
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Bioversity International
    • Bioversity Discussion/Working Papers
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes.

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Drucker_PES_Andes_2015.pdf (1.572Mb)
    Authors
    Drucker, Adam G.
    Narloch, U.
    Pascual, U.
    Soto, J.L.
    Pinto, M.
    Midler, E.
    Valdivia, E.
    Rojas, W.
    Date Issued
    2015
    Language
    en
    Type
    Working Paper
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Drucker, A.G.; Narloch, U.; Pascual, U.; Soto, J.L.; Pinto, M.; Midler, E.; Valdivia, E.; Rojas, W. (2015) Domestication of payments for ecosystem services: new evidence from the Andes. CAPRi Working Paper No. 118. International Food Policy Research Institute. 61 p.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/70126
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.2499/CAPRiWP118
    Abstract/Description
    The current project has sought to assess i) the potential of agricultural biodiversity-focused PES to serve as a cost-effective and socially equitable domesticated diversity conservation incentive scheme, as well as ii) how economic incentive mechanisms such as PES can be designed to build on and complement local institutions of collective action. Results are presented from pilot Payment for Agrobiodiversity Conservation (PACS) schemes and framed field experiments implemented in the Bolivian and Peruvian Andes aimed at sustaining diversity within quinoa, a traditional Andean grain. Findings indicate that opportunity costs of conservation vary widely not only between the two study sites, but also between community-based groups within each site. This creates opportunities to minimize intervention costs by selecting least-cost conserving farmers. However, as shown with respect to the role of wealth and cooperation in determining opportunity costs, this also has implications for the type of farmer to be included in the conservation programme. Promisingly, depending on the fairness principle deemed most important in the local context, there does not necessarily have to be a significant trade-off between the schemes’ potential cost-effectiveness and equity outcomes. The observed behavior in the farmer experimental games further supports such findings and suggests that understanding farmer perceptions of fairness can have important implications for the design of conservation incentive mechanisms, particularly given the important influence of such perceptions on the pro-social behavior that underlies much de facto conservation. Incentive mechanisms, such as PACS, that can support socially valued ends not only by harnessing selfish preferences to public ends but also by evoking public-spirited motives are also more likely to be sustainable over the long-term. The use of PACS incentives for the maintenance of traditional crop varieties and the improvement of smallholder farmer livelihoods thus appears promising for further development and up-scaling.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Adam Druckerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9800-6800
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Policies, Institutions, and Markets
    AGROVOC Keywords
    economic development; ecosystem services; quinoa; biodiversity; agriculture; field experimentation
    Subjects
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; AGRICULTURE; BIODIVERSITY; FIELD EXPERIMENTATION; RANGELANDS;
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    Bioversity International; University of Cambridge; Basque Centre for Climate Change; Centro de Investigacion de Recursos Naturales y Medio Ambiente; Fundación PROINPA
    Collections
    • Bioversity Discussion/Working Papers [381]
    • Effective Genetic Resources Conservation and Use [446]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback