CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI presentations
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI presentations
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Assessment of hygienic practices among pig slaughterhouses and markets in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Presentation (1.552Mb)
    Authors
    Jenpanich, C.
    Unger, Fred
    Alter, T.
    Chaisowwong, W.
    Date Issued
    2015-08
    Language
    en
    Type
    Presentation
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Jenpanich, C., Unger, F., Alter, T. and Chaisowwong, W. 2015. Assessment of hygienic practices among pig slaughterhouses and markets in Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Presented at the 4th Food Safety and Zoonoses Symposium for Asia Pacific and 2nd Regional EcoHealth Symposium, Chiang Mai, Thailand, 3-5 August 2015. Berlin, Germany: Freie Universität Berlin.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/71026
    External link to download this item: https://www.slideshare.net/ILRI/assessment-of-hygienic-practices-pig-slaughterhouses
    Abstract/Description
    Insufficient hygienic practices of food handlers such as poor personal hygiene associated with foodborne illness can lead to crosscontamination along food chains. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of food handlers regarding food safety and hygienic practices in addition to assess the level of microbiological hygiene indicators. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 16 slaughterhouses and 31 markets in Chiang Mai province. Overall 32 slaughterhouse workers and 51 pork sellers were assessed to determine their KAP by questionnaires including likert-scales. Microbiological hygiene indicators were determined by conventional cultural methods. KAP results indicated a high level of knowledge (80 to 100%) concerning cross contamination, personal hygiene and time-temperature control but hold medium level (50 to 75%) for foodborne illness. Eighty-five percent of food handlers knew that good personal hygiene could prevent foodborne disease. Identified gaps between attitudes and practices indicated that some hygiene measures are inappropriate in the context of their practical implementation and some of these hygiene practices are not in accordance with their socioeconomic status. There were variations of knowledge between slaughterhouse workers and sellers. Mean of aerobic bacteria count from carcass swabs at slaughterhouses and pork samples at markets were 3.09±1.34 log10 cfu/cm2 and 5.50±0.39 log10 cfu/g. respectively. The mean Enterobacteriaceae count was 0.03±1.08 log10 cfu/cm2 and 2.55±1.43 log10 cfu/g respectively. Existing hygiene recommendations should be revised and adjusted according to their practical implementation considering also socio-economics and other factors of food handlers. Our results provide basic information for educational programs in order to improve knowledge of food safety and hygiene practices and narrow down the gaps between attitudes and practices.
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Agriculture for Nutrition and Health
    AGROVOC Keywords
    health; swine
    Subjects
    FOOD SAFETY; MARKETS; PIGS;
    Countries
    Thailand
    Regions
    Asia; South-eastern Asia
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    Freie Universität Berlin; Chiang Mai University; International Livestock Research Institute
    Collections
    • Ecosystem approaches to the better management of zoonotic emerging infectious diseases in the Southeast Asia region (EcoZd) [155]
    • ILRI presentations [1761]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback