CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • Bioversity International
    • Bioversity Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • Bioversity International
    • Bioversity Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    Boshier_LocalBest.pdf (1.323Mb)
    Authors
    Boshier, D.
    Broadhurst, L.
    Cornelius, Jonathan P.
    Gallo, L.
    Koskela, Jaarko
    Loo, J.
    Petrokofsky, G.
    St Clair, B.
    Date Issued
    2015-12
    Date Online
    2015-10
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Boshier, D.; Broadhurst, L.; Cornelius, J.; Gallo, L.; Koskela, J.; Loo, J.; Petrokofsky, G.; St Clair, B.; (2015) Is local best? Examining the evidence for local adaptation in trees and its scale. Environmental Evidence 4(20) ISSN: 2047-2382
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/71136
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-015-0046-3
    Abstract/Description
    Although the importance of using local provenance planting stock for woodland production, habitat conservation and restoration remains contentious, the concept is easy to understand, attractive and easy to ‘sell’. With limited information about the extent and scale of adaptive variation in native trees, discussion about suitable seed sources often emphasises “local” in a very narrow sense or within political boundaries, rather than being based on sound evidence of the scale over which adaptation occurs. Concerns exist over the actual scale (magnitude and spatial scale) of adaptation in trees and the relative dangers of incorrect seed source or restricted seed collection, leading to the establishment of trees with restricted genetic diversity and limited adaptive potential. Tree provenance and progeny field trials in many parts of the world have shown the existence of genotype by environment interaction in many tree species, but have not necessarily looked at whether this is expressed as a home site advantage (i.e. whether provenance performance is unstable across sites, and there is better performance of a local seed source). This review will examine the evidence for local adaptation and its scale in a number of native tree species from different trial sites across the globe (e.g. tropical, Mediterranean, temperate). These trials have been measured and in some cases results published in a range of formats. The data have, however, usually been presented in the form of which provenances grow best at which sites. The review will examine existing data (published and unpublished) in the context of the scale of local adaptation, with the results being presented in two formats: (a) relating survival, performance of provenances (classified by seed zone/provenance region of origin) to seed zone/provenance region of the planting site; (b) plotting survival, performance provenances against the distance (Euclidean/ecological) between the provenance and the trial site.
    Other CGIAR Affiliations
    Forests, Trees and Agroforestry
    AGROVOC Keywords
    provenance trials; adaptation; survival
    Subjects
    PROVENANCE TRIALS; ADAPTATION; SURVIVAL;
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    University of Oxford; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research; World Agroforestry Centre; Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria, Argentina; United States Department of Agriculture
    Collections
    • Bioversity Journal Articles [1060]
    • Productive and Resilient Farms, Forests and Landscapes [521]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback