CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)
    • ILRI articles in journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Foot-and-mouth disease impact on smallholders - What do we know, what don’t we know and how can we find out more?

    Thumbnail
    
    Authors
    Knight-Jones, T.J.D.
    McLaws, M.
    Rushton, Jonathan
    Date
    2016
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    Citation
    Knight-Jones, T.J.D., McLaws, M. and Rushton, J. 2016. Foot-and-mouth disease impact on smallholders - What do we know, what don’t we know and how can we find out more? Transboundary and Emerging Diseases.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/75604
    DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tbed.12507
    Abstract/Description
    Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) endemic regions contain three-quarters of the world's FMD susceptible livestock and most of the world's poor livestock keepers. Yet FMD impact on smallholders in these regions is poorly understood. Diseases of low mortality can exert a large impact if incidence is high. Modelling and field studies commonly find high FMD incidence in endemic countries. Sero-surveys typically find a third of young cattle are sero-positive, however, the proportion of sero-positive animals that developed disease, and resulting impact, are unknown. The few smallholder FMD impact studies that have been performed assessed different aspects of impact, using different approaches. They find that FMD impact can be high (>10% of annual household income). However, impact is highly variable, being a function of FMD incidence and dependency on activities affected by FMD. FMD restricts investment in productive but less FMD-resilient farming methods, however, other barriers to efficient production may exist, reducing the benefits of FMD control. Applying control measures is costly and can have wide-reaching negative impacts; veterinary-cordon-fences may damage wildlife populations, and livestock movement restrictions and trade bans damage farmer profits and the wider economy. When control measures are ineffective, farmers, society and wildlife may experience the burden of control without reducing disease burden. Foot-and-mouth disease control has benefitted smallholders in South America and elsewhere. Success takes decades of regional cooperation with effective veterinary services and widespread farmer participation. However, both the likelihood of success and the full cost of control measures must be considered. Controlling FMD in smallholder systems is challenging, particularly when movement restrictions are hard to enforce. In parts of Africa this is compounded by endemically infected wildlife and limited vaccine performance. This paper reviews FMD impact on smallholders in endemic countries. Significant evidence gaps exist and guidance on the design of FMD impact studies is provided.
    CGIAR Affiliations
    Agriculture for Nutrition and Health
    AGROVOC Keywords
    ANIMAL DISEASES
    Subjects
    ANIMAL DISEASES; DISEASE CONTROL; FMD; IMPACT ASSESSMENT;
    Collections
    • CRP A4NH outputs [504]
    • ILRI Food Safety and Zoonoses program outputs [750]
    • ILRI articles in journals [5079]

    AboutPrivacy PolicySend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CPWF subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy CIFOR subjectBy IWMI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy CTA subjectBy WLE subjectBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy animal breedBy CGIAR System subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy CPWF subjectBy CCAFS subjectBy CIFOR subjectBy IWMI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy CRP subjectBy River basinBy Output typeBy CTA subjectBy WLE subjectBy Bioversity subjectBy CIAT subjectBy CIP subjectBy animal breedBy CGIAR System subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy PolicySend Feedback