Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMburu, Samuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorSousa-Poza, Alfonsoen_US
dc.contributor.authorOtterbach, Steffenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMude, Andrew G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-09T12:54:53Zen_US
dc.date.available2016-09-09T12:54:53Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/77000en_US
dc.titleIncome and asset poverty among pastoralists in northern Kenyaen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractThe Kenyan drylands, which make up about 84% of Kenya's total land surface, support about 8 million Kenyans with animal husbandry as the main source of livelihood. The livestock subsector in these dry areas accounts for over 70% of local family income, as well as 10% of the country's gross domestic product (GDP) and 50% of its agricultural GDP (Government of Kenya, 2012). Yet despite this sector's significant contribution to the economy, these dryland areas, especially in northern Kenya, have been undermined by systematic marginalisation, poor infrastructure and services, and persistent community conflicts and raids. At the same time, the threats from persistent droughts have escalated, with Northern Kenya recording 28 major droughts in the past 100 years and 4 in just the last 10 years and given the changing global climate, this trend is likely to continue or even worsen. These recurrent droughts and lack of supporting infrastructure have resulted in increased loss of livestock, leading to income loss that has rendered the pastoralists vulnerable to poverty. In this study, we use five waves of household panel data collected in the Marsabit district of Northern Kenya, to analyse the patterns of livelihood sources and poverty among pastoralists in that area. We estimate income poverty using imputed household income relative to the adjusted poverty line and asset poverty using a regression-based asset index and tropical livestock units (TLU) per capita. Our results indicate that keeping livestock is still the pastoralists' main source of livelihood, although there is a notable trend of increasing livelihood diversification, especially among livestock-poor households. The majority of households (over 70%) are both income and livestock poor with few having escaped poverty within the five-year study period. Disaggregating income and asset poverty also reveals an increasing trend of both structurally poor and stochastically nonpoor households. Food aid plays only a minor role in alleviating poverty.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMburu, S., Sousa-Poza, A., Otterbach, S. and Mude, A. 2016. Income and asset poverty among pastoralists in northern Kenya. Paper presented at the Tropentag 2016 Conference on Solidarity in a Competing World—Fair Use of Resources, Vienna, Austria, 19–21 September 2016. Stuttgart, Germany: University of Hohenheim.en_US
dcterms.issued2016en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherUniversity of Hohenheimen_US
dcterms.subjectinsuranceen_US
dcterms.subjectlivestocken_US
dcterms.typeConference Paper Abstracten_US
cg.subject.ilriINSURANCEen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVELIHOODSen_US
cg.subject.ilriLIVESTOCKen_US
cg.subject.ilriPASTORALISMen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversität Hohenheimen_US
cg.placeStuttgart, Germanyen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.contributor.crpDryland Systemsen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.creator.identifierAndrew Mude: 0000-0003-4903-6613en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record