Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPiikki, Kristinen_US
dc.contributor.authorSöderström, Matsen_US
dc.contributor.authorEriksson, Janen_US
dc.contributor.authorMuturi, John Jamlecken_US
dc.contributor.authorMuthee, Patrick Irerien_US
dc.contributor.authorWetterlind, Johannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorLund, Ericen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-09T20:19:12Zen_US
dc.date.available2016-12-09T20:19:12Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/78258en_US
dc.titlePerformance evaluation of proximal sensors for soil assessment in smallholder farms in Embu County, Kenyaen_US
cg.subject.ciatSOIL INFORMATIONen_US
dcterms.abstractFour proximal soil sensors were tested at four smallholder farms in Embu County, Kenya: a portable X-ray fluorescence sensor (PXRF), a mobile phone application for soil color determination by photography, a dual-depth electromagnetic induction (EMI) sensor, and a LED-based soil optical reflectance sensor. Measurements were made at 32–43 locations at each site. Topsoil samples were analyzed for plant-available nutrients (N, P, K, Mg, Ca, S, B, Mn, Zn, Cu, and Fe), pH, total nitrogen (TN) and total carbon (TC), soil texture, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and exchangeable aluminum (Al). Multivariate prediction models of each of the lab-analyzed soil properties were parameterized for 576 sensor-variable combinations. Prediction models for K, N, Ca and S, B, Zn, Mn, Fe, TC, Al, and CEC met the setup criteria for functional, robust, and accurate models. The PXRF sensor was the sensor most often included in successful models. We concluded that the combination of a PXRF and a portable soil reflectance sensor is a promising combination of handheld soil sensors for the development of in situ soil assessments as a field-based alternative or complement to laboratory measurements.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationPiikki, Kristin; Söderström, Mats; Eriksson, Jan; Muturi, John Jamleck; Muthee, Patrick Ireri; Wetterlind, Johanna; Lund, Eric. 2016. Performance evaluation of proximal sensors for soil assessment in smallholder farms in Embu County, Kenya . Sensor. 16 (11): 1950.en_US
dcterms.extent16 (11): 1950en_US
dcterms.issued2016en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherMDPI AGen_US
dcterms.subjectsoilen_US
dcterms.subjectsmallholdersen_US
dcterms.subjectsubsistence farmingen_US
dcterms.subjectsensorsen_US
dcterms.subjectsamplingen_US
dcterms.subjectsoils propertiesen_US
dcterms.subjectsueloen_US
dcterms.subjectagricultura de subsistenciaen_US
dcterms.subjectsensoresen_US
dcterms.subjectmuestreoen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.creator.identifierKristin Persson: 0000-0003-2120-4486en_US
cg.creator.identifierMats Söderström: 0000-0001-9946-0979en_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalSensoren_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record