Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOtieno, G.A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMulumba, John W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWedajoo, A.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLee, M.J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKiwuka, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOmara, R.O.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAdokorach, Joyceen_US
dc.contributor.authorZaake, E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHalewood, Michaelen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-15T08:51:20Zen_US
dc.date.available2016-12-15T08:51:20Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/78335en_US
dc.titleNetworks and coalitions in the implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Ugandaen_US
cg.subject.bioversityPOLICIESen_US
cg.subject.bioversityNETWORKSen_US
cg.subject.bioversitySTAKEHOLDERSen_US
cg.subject.bioversityINTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTSen_US
cg.subject.bioversityPLANT GENETIC RESOURCESen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
dcterms.abstractUganda acceded to the International Treaty for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGTFA) in the year 2003. Despite this, there are still gaps in implementation of the treaty in the country. The article provides insights into the systemic interactions and coalitions among actors in the implementation of the treaty and subsequent barriers to the implementation of the ITPGRFA. Using social network analysis, the interactions of 26 key policy actors are mapped for 4 main expertise networks that are important for implementation of the treaty; that is, the policy direction networks; scientific expertise; financial expertise; and legal networks in order to identify gaps for further action. Findings indicate that the linkages between actors are poor especially in the legal expertise and policy direction networks where the competent authority for the treaty does not have efficient connections with critical and non-critical actors. Many key actors are also excluded from the network leading poor information and resource flows among stakeholders implementing the treaty. In the interim, a memorandum of understanding has been signed by three major institutions that are key to establish clear processes for implementation of the treaty and establishing clear guidelines for access and benefit sharing and clear roles of institutions involved in the policy development and implementation. Key lessons learned from this research are that networks and coalitions are important for fostering information and exchange of expertise to enable effective implementation or domestication of the international treaty (IT). The structured engagement of other non-governmental stakeholders such as non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and international organizations that provide financial and technical support for various aspects of policy implementation is also important.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.available2016-10-31en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationOtieno, G.A.; Mulumba, J.W.; Wedajoo, A.S.; Lee, M.J.; Kiwuka, C.; Omara, R.O.; Adokorach, J.; Zaake, E.; Halewood, M. (2016). Networks and coalitions in the implementation of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture in Uganda. Journal of Public Administration and Policy Research 8(6) p. 65-79 ISSN: 2141-2480en_US
dcterms.extentp. 65-79en_US
dcterms.issued2016en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherAcademic Journalsen_US
dcterms.subjectpoliciesen_US
dcterms.subjectnetworksen_US
dcterms.subjectstakeholdersen_US
dcterms.subjectinternational agreementsen_US
dcterms.subjectplant genetic resourcesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationBioversity Internationalen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationNational Agricultural Research Organization, Ugandaen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Illinoisen_US
cg.identifier.urlhttp://www.academicjournals.org/journal/JPAPR/how-to-cite-article/2C571D361199en_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5897/JPAPR2016.0358en_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUgandaen_US
cg.contributor.crpPolicies, Institutions, and Marketsen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2UGen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.journalJournal of Public Administration and Policy Researchen_US
cg.issn2141-2480en_US
cg.volume8en_US
cg.issue6en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record