Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDile, Y.T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKarlberg, L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDaggupati, P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWiberg, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRockström, Johanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-22T05:56:39Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-05-22T05:56:39Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/81145en_US
dc.titleAssessing the implications of water harvesting intensification on upstream–downstream ecosystem services: a case study in the Lake Tana basinen_US
dcterms.abstractWater harvesting systems have improved productivity in various regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Similarly, they can help retain water in landscapes, build resilience against droughts and dry spells, and thereby contribute to sustainable agricultural intensification. However, there is no strong empirical evidence that shows the effects of intensification of water harvesting on upstream–downstream social–ecological systems at a landscape scale. In this paper we develop a decision support system (DSS) for locating and sizing water harvesting ponds in a hydrological model, which enables assessments of water harvesting intensification on upstream–downstream ecosystem services in meso-scale watersheds. The DSS was used with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) for a case-study area located in the Lake Tana basin, Ethiopia. We found that supplementary irrigation in combination with nutrient application increased simulated teff (Eragrostis tef, staple crop in Ethiopia) production up to three times, compared to the current practice. Moreover, after supplemental irrigation of teff, the excess water was used for dry season onion production of 7.66 t/ha (median). Water harvesting, therefore, can play an important role in increasing local- to regional-scale food security through increased and more stable food production and generation of extra income from the sale of cash crops. The annual total irrigation water consumption was ~ 4%–30% of the annual water yield from the entire watershed. In general, water harvesting resulted in a reduction in peak flows and an increase in low flows. Water harvesting substantially reduced sediment yield leaving the watershed. The beneficiaries of water harvesting ponds may benefit from increases in agricultural production. The downstream social–ecological systems may benefit from reduced food prices, reduced flooding damages, and reduced sediment influxes, as well as enhancements in low flows and water quality. The benefits of water harvesting warrant economic feasibility studies and detailed analyses of its ecological impacts.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDile, Y. T.; Karlberg, L.; Daggupati, P.; Srinivasan, R.; Wiberg, D.; Rockstrom, J. 2016. Assessing the implications of water harvesting intensification on upstream–downstream ecosystem services: a case study in the Lake Tana basin. Science of The Total Environment, 542:22-35. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.065en_US
dcterms.extent542:22-35en_US
dcterms.issued2016-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCopyrighted; all rights reserveden_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectwater harvestingen_US
dcterms.subjectwater requirementsen_US
dcterms.subjectwater qualityen_US
dcterms.subjectwater useen_US
dcterms.subjectintensificationen_US
dcterms.subjectstream flowen_US
dcterms.subjectupstreamen_US
dcterms.subjectdownstreamen_US
dcterms.subjectecosystem servicesen_US
dcterms.subjectcrop yielden_US
dcterms.subjectsupplemental irrigationen_US
dcterms.subjectirrigation wateren_US
dcterms.subjectsedimenten_US
dcterms.subjectsustainable agricultureen_US
dcterms.subjectecologyen_US
dcterms.subjectdecision support systemsen_US
dcterms.subjectpondsen_US
dcterms.subjectwatershedsen_US
dcterms.subjectsoilen_US
dcterms.subjectassessmenten_US
dcterms.subjectnutrient availabilityen_US
dcterms.subjectonionsen_US
dcterms.subjectfood securityen_US
dcterms.subjectfood productionen_US
dcterms.subjecteconomic aspectsen_US
dcterms.subjectcase studiesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.065en_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryEthiopiaen_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ETen_US
cg.journalScience of The Total Environmenten_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record