Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMakombe, Godswillen_US
dc.contributor.authorNamara, Regassa E.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAwulachew, Seleshi Bekeleen_US
dc.contributor.authorHagos, Fitsumen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanjere, M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-22T06:13:52Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-05-22T06:13:52Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/81146en_US
dc.titleAn analysis of the productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder irrigation in Ethiopiaen_US
dcterms.abstractAgriculture is the mainstay of Ethiopia’s economy, contributing more than 40% to GDP and providing a livelihood to about 80% of the population. Agriculture is dominated by smallholders growing predominantly rainfed cereals, making economic performance dependent on rainfall availability. This study used the stochastic frontier production function to analyse the productivity and technical efficiency of 4 different agricultural production systems in Ethiopia; namely, irrigated seasonal farms on traditional irrigation systems, irrigated seasonal farms on modern communal irrigation systems, rainfed seasonal farms for farmers who have access to irrigation and rainfed seasonal farms for farmers who do not have access to irrigation. Simple random samples of farmers were selected from lists of farmers. The sample of farmers constituted 122 from the traditional irrigated sites, 281 from the modern communal irrigated sites and 350 from the control rainfed sites of farmers without access to irrigation. For those farmers, from both traditional and modern communal irrigation, who also had access to rainfed farms, their rainfed farms were included in the sample of rainfed with access to irrigation. This sample constituted 434 farmers. The marginal productivity of land on modern communal irrigation systems shows that this is the smallholder irrigation option that should be developed by the Government of Ethiopia. However, the marginal productivity of land in the ‘rainfed without access to irrigation’ category is higher than that of the traditional irrigated system. Thus additional developed land should be put under ‘rainfed without access to irrigation’ before it is put under traditional irrigation; otherwise it should be developed into modern communal irrigation. The average technical efficiency for the modern irrigated system was estimated to be about 71%, whereas this was estimated to be 78% for the ‘rainfed without access to irrigation’ system. There are potential gains to be realised in improving efficiency in these two systems.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.available2017-02-01en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMakombe, G.; Namara, R. E.; Awulachew, S. B.; Hagos, Fitsum; Kanjere, M. 2017. An analysis of the productivity and technical efficiency of smallholder irrigation in Ethiopia. Water SA, 43(1):48-57. doi: 10.4314/wsa.v43i1.08en_US
dcterms.extent48-57en_US
dcterms.issued2017en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherAfrican Journals Online (AJOL)en_US
dcterms.subjectfloodplainsen_US
dcterms.subjectsatellite observationen_US
dcterms.subjectsatellite imageryen_US
dcterms.subjecthouseholdsen_US
dcterms.subjectnatural disastersen_US
dcterms.subjectindigenous knowledgeen_US
dcterms.subjectremote sensingen_US
dcterms.subjectrisk reductionen_US
dcterms.subjectliving standardsen_US
dcterms.subjectfarmlanden_US
dcterms.subjecthydrologyen_US
dcterms.subjectclimate changeen_US
dcterms.subjectcatchment areasen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v43i1.08en_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryZambiaen_US
cg.contributor.crpAquatic Agricultural Systemsen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ZMen_US
cg.journalWater SAen_US
cg.volume43en_US
cg.issue1en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record