CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Potato Center (CIP)
    • CIP Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Potato Center (CIP)
    • CIP Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Determinants of the use of certified seed potato among smallholder farmers: the case of potato growers in central and eastern Kenya.

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Okello, J.J.
    Zhou, Y.
    Kwikiriza, N.
    Ogutu, S.O.
    Barker, I.
    Schulte-Geldermann, Elmar
    Atieno, E.
    Ahmed, J.T.
    Date Issued
    2016-10
    Date Online
    2016-10
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Usage rights
    CC-BY-4.0
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Okello, J.J.; Zhou, Y.; Kwikiriza, N.; Ogutu, S.O.; Barker, I.; Schulte-Geldermann, E.; Atieno, E.; Ahmed, J.T. 2016. Determinants of the use of certified seed potato among smallholder farmers: the case of potato growers in central and eastern Kenya. Agriculture. (Switzerland). ISSN 2077-0472. 6(4):12 p.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/81183
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture6040055
    Abstract/Description
    Potato yields in sub-Saharan Africa remain very low compared with those of developed countries. Yet potato is major food staple and source of income to the predominantly smallholder growing households in the tropical highlands of this region. A major cause of the low potato yields is the use of poor quality seed potato. This paper examines the factors determining the decision to use certified seed potato (CSP), as well as the intensity of its use, among potato growers with access to it. We focused on potato growers in the central highlands of Kenya and used regression analysis to test hypotheses relating to potential impediments of CSP use. The study found that the distance to the market (a proxy for transaction costs), household food insecurity, and asset endowment affect the decision to use CSP. However, the effect of the intensity of use of CSP depends on how the intensity variable is defined. Several other control variables also affect the decision and extent of CSP use. The study concludes that transaction costs, asset endowment, and household food insecurity play a major role in the decision by smallholder potato farmers to use CSP and the extent to which they do so. We also discuss the policy implications of the findings.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Julius Juma Okellohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2217-2770
    Elmar Schulte-Geldermannhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1784-4333
    norman kwikirizahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-812X
    Elly Atienohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4354-1785
    AGROVOC Keywords
    seed potatoes; smallholders; seed certification; yields; use efficiency
    Subjects
    SEED SYSTEMS; POTATO AGRI-FOOD SYSTEMS; POTATOES; INCLUSIVE GROWTH; SOCIAL AND NUTRITIONAL SCIENCES SNS;
    Countries
    Kenya
    Regions
    Africa; Middle Africa; Eastern Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Potato Center; Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture; Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
    Collections
    • CIP Journal Articles [1044]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback