Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVirk, Daljit S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHarris, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRaghuwanshi, B.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRaj, A.G.Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorSodhi, P.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWitcombe, John R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-20T08:59:51Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-06-20T08:59:51Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/81901en_US
dc.titleA holistic approach to participatory crop improvement in wheaten_US
cg.subject.ciatPLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.subject.ciatFARMING SYSTEMSen_US
dcterms.abstractThe term "participatory crop improvement" is used to cover all aspects of crop improvement where farmers are involved in a participatory role. In this paper, we describe the approach and results for participatory crop improvement in wheat, in Luna Wada sub district, Gujarat, India. Nine villages were selected for study, and within each village, farmers were ranked into categories by wealth. An initial baseline survey on farming practices was conducted by semi structured interviews on a sample of farmers. Selected farmers from each wealth category kelp weekly farm calendars of all operations in their wheal fields. Selected fields were termed "intensive data plots." They provided a basis for analyzing Ihe farming system and profitability by wealth category, as well as for identifying constrains. The baseline surveys revealed that upper-category farmers benefitted most from the sale of wheat produce. The lower-category farmers consumed a large part of their produce. Intensive data plots showed that upper-category farmers accrued higher net gains from wheat cultivation than Ihe lower-category farmers. Participatory varietal selection (PVS) offered new varieties to farmers for selection. PVS resulted in significant replacement of the old variety Lok 1, grown in about 90% of the area, by many varieties that increased yield levels and on-farm biodiversity. Resource-poor farmers benefitted as much as the better-off farmers from PVS activities. Participating farmers experimented on a simple, cheap agronomic intervention: seed priming. Most farmers intended to adopt it because of its multiple beneficial effects, including increased yields. This holistic approach to participatory methods was effective in analyzing poverty issues, identifying constraints and new opportunities, and monitoring impact.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVirk, Daljit S.; Harris, D.; Raghuwanshi, B.S.; Raj, A.G.B.; Sodhi, P.S.; Witcombe, John R.. 2001. A holistic approach to participatory crop improvement in wheat. In: An exchange of experiences from South and South East Asia: Proceedings of the international symposium on Participatory plant breeding and participatory plant genetic resources enhancement, Pokhara, Nepal, 1-5 May 2000. Cali: CGIAR Program for Participatory Research and Gender Analysis: 275-282.en_US
dcterms.extentp. 275-282en_US
dcterms.issued2001en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherCGIAR Systemwide Program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis for Technology Development and Institutional Innovationen_US
dcterms.subjecttriticumen_US
dcterms.subjectwheatsen_US
dcterms.subjectvariety trialsen_US
dcterms.subjectproductivityen_US
dcterms.subjectproduction costsen_US
dcterms.subjectfarming systemsen_US
dcterms.subjectfitomejoramientoen_US
dcterms.subjecttrigoen_US
dcterms.subjectensayos de variedadesen_US
dcterms.subjectproductividaden_US
dcterms.subjectcostos de producciónen_US
dcterms.subjectsistemas de explotaciónen_US
dcterms.typeBook Chapteren_US
cg.identifier.urlhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/56523en_US
cg.placeCali, Colombiaen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record