Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeerwaarden, Joost vanen_US
dc.contributor.authorBaijukya, Frederick P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKyei-Boahen, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAdjei-Nsiah, Samuelen_US
dc.contributor.authorEbanyat, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorKamai, N.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWoldemeskel, Endalkachewen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanampiu, F.K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVanlauwe, Bernarden_US
dc.contributor.authorGiller, Ken E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-09-28T12:56:23Zen_US
dc.date.available2017-09-28T12:56:23Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/88072en_US
dc.titleSoyabean response to rhizobium inoculation across sub-Saharan Africa: Patterns of variation and the role of promiscuityen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaGRAIN LEGUMESen_US
cg.subject.iitaSOYBEANen_US
dcterms.abstractImproving bacterial nitrogen fixation in grain legumes is central to sustainable intensification of agriculture in sub-Saharan Africa. In the case of soyabean, two main approaches have been pursued: first, promiscuous varieties were developed to form effective symbiosis with locally abundant nitrogen fixing bacteria. Second, inoculation with elite bacterial strains is being promoted. Analyses of the success of these approaches in tropical smallholder systems are scarce. It is unclear how current promiscuous and non-promiscuous soyabean varieties perform in inoculated and uninoculated fields, and the extent of variation in inoculation response across regions and environmental conditions remains to be determined. We present an analysis of on-farm yields and inoculation responses across ten countries in Sub Saharan Africa, including both promiscuous and non-promiscuous varieties. By combining data from a core set of replicated on-farm trials with that from a large number of farmer-managed try-outs, we study the potential for inoculation to increase yields in both variety types and evaluate the magnitude and variability of response. Average yields were estimated to be 1343 and 1227 kg/ha with and without inoculation respectively. Inoculation response varied widely between trials and locations, with no clear spatial patterns at larger scales and without evidence that this variation could be explained by yield constraints or environmental conditions. On average, specific varieties had similar uninoculated yields, while responding more strongly to inoculation. Side-by side comparisons revealed that stronger responses were observed at sites where promiscuous varieties had superior uninoculated yields, suggesting the availability of compatible, effective bacteria as a yield limiting factor and as a determinant of the magnitude of inoculation response.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Accessen_US
dcterms.audienceScientistsen_US
dcterms.available2017-09-07en_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationvan Heerwaarden, J., Baijukya, F., Kyei-Boahen, S., Adjei-Nsiah, S., Ebanyat, P., Kamai, N., ... & Giller, K. (2018). Soyabean response to rhizobium inoculation across sub-Saharan Africa: patterns of variation and the role of promiscuity. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 261, 211-218.en_US
dcterms.extent1-8en_US
dcterms.issued2018-07en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0en_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectbradyrhizobiumen_US
dcterms.subjectsoybeansen_US
dcterms.subjectfarmersen_US
dcterms.subjectsustainable agricultureen_US
dcterms.subjectintensificationen_US
dcterms.subjectvarietiesen_US
dcterms.subjectgrain legumesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationWageningen University & Researchen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.08.016en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionMiddle Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCongo, Democratic Republic ofen_US
cg.coverage.countryEthiopiaen_US
cg.coverage.countryGhanaen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.coverage.countryMalawien_US
cg.coverage.countryMozambiqueen_US
cg.coverage.countryNigeriaen_US
cg.coverage.countryRwandaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUgandaen_US
cg.coverage.countryZimbabween_US
cg.contributor.crpGrain Legumesen_US
cg.contributor.crpIntegrated Systems for the Humid Tropicsen_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CDen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ETen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2GHen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MWen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2MZen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NGen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2RWen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2UGen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ZWen_US
cg.creator.identifierKen E Giller: 0000-0002-5998-4652en_US
cg.contributor.donorBill & Melinda Gates Foundationen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.journalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environmenten_US
cg.issn0167-8809en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record