CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT)
    • CIAT Articles in Journals
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Management and Motivations to Manage “Wild” Food Plants. A Case Study in a Mestizo Village in the Amazon Deforestation Frontier

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Cruz García, Gisella S.
    Date Issued
    2017
    Date Online
    2017-10
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    Accessibility
    Open Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Cruz-Garcia, Gisella S.. 2017. Management and Motivations to Manage “Wild” Food Plants. A Case Study in a Mestizo Village in the Amazon Deforestation Frontier. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 5:127.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/89204
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00127
    Abstract/Description
    Human management of anthropogenic environments and species is tightly linked to the ecology and evolution of plants gathered by humans. This is certainly the case for wild food plants, which exist on a continuum of human management. Given alarming deforestation rates, wild food plant gathering is increasingly occurring in anthropogenic ecosystems, where farmers actively manage these species in order to ensure their availability and access. This study was conducted in a mestizo village in the Peruvian Amazon deforestation frontier, with the objective of documenting the management practices, including the human-induced movement of wild food plant species across the forest-agriculture landscape, and the motivations that farmers have to manage them using a qualitative ethnobotanical approach. The results of focus group discussions showed that 67% of the 30 “wild” food plant species reported for the village were managed, and almost all plants that were managed have been transplanted. The strongest flow of transplanted material was from forest to agricultural field (11 species), followed by market to field (five species), and field to home garden (four species). Farmers argued that the main reason for transplanting “wild” food plants was to have them closer to home, because they perceived that the abundance of 77% of these species decreased in the last years. Conversely, the most important reason for not transplanting a “wild” plant was the long time it takes to grow, stated for 67% of the species that have not been transplanted. Remarkably, more than half (57%) of the “wild” food plant species, including 76% of the species that are managed, have been classified as weeds by scientific literature. Finally, the “wild” food plant species were classified in six mutually exclusive groups according to management form and perceived abundance. The study concluded that “wild” food plant management, including management of species classified as weeds by scientific literature, is a crucial adaptation strategy of farmers aimed at ensuring their food security in scenarios of increasing deforestation. Finally, the article reflects on the major implications of human management on the ecology and evolution of food plant species.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Gisella S. Cruz-Garciahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2699-3157
    AGROVOC Keywords
    domesticación de plantas; plant domestication; transplanting; transplante; wil; plantas silvestres; perú
    Countries
    Peru
    Regions
    Latin America; South America
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Center for Tropical Agriculture
    Collections
    • CIAT Articles in Journals [2636]
    • CIAT Decision and Policy Analysis - DAPA [620]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback