Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWood, A.R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDen Breeyen, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBeed, Fenton D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-15T10:50:51Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-01-15T10:50:51Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/90206en_US
dc.titleFirst report of smut on Imperata cylindrica caused by Sporisorium schweinfurthianum in South Africaen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaWEEDSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.iitaDISEASE CONTROLen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT DISEASESen_US
cg.subject.iitaPESTS OF PLANTSen_US
dcterms.abstractImperata cylindrica (L.) Raeusch. (Poaceae) is indigenous to the old world but is a problem weed in tropical areas throughout the world (1). A smut fungus was observed frequently on this grass at a single site near Pretoria (25°44′19′′S, 28°15′39′′E), South Africa during April of 2006. On the basis of the following characteristics, it was identified as Sporisorium schweinfurthianum (Thüm.) K. Vánky (2). Panicles were systemically infected and all ovaries in infected inflorescences were replaced by spores. Spores were globose or subglobose, brown, 10 to 14 × 9 to 12 μm (average 11.2 × 9.8 μm; n = 25), wall 1 μm thick, and finely verruculose. Hyaline, thin-walled sterile cells were present. This identification was confirmed by K. Vánky (personal communication to A. R. Wood). To our knowledge, this is the first report of this smut species from southern Africa. A voucher specimen has been deposited in the South African National Collection of Fungi, ARC-Plant Protection Research Institute (PREM 59895). To test pathogenicity, soil in 15 pots with individual 1-month-old seedlings was drenched with an aqueous suspension of 1 × 108spores ml–1 amended with 0.1% Tween 80. Before treatment, the pots were placed on pot trays and remained immersed in the spore suspension in the trays at 28°C (relative humidity <80%) for 24 h. To maintain the spore concentration in the soil, the pots were not watered until 7 days after inoculation. Distilled water amended with 0.1% Tween 80 was applied as control treatments to a further 15 pots with plants. Five of the treated plants produced panicles within 4 months of inoculation. Of these, all the ovaries of four emerging inflorescences were completely replaced with a brown, powdery mass of teliospores. No smutted panicles developed on the control plants. This smut fungus may have potential as a classical biological control agent for use against I. cylindrica by reducing dispersal by seed.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationWood, A.R., Den Breeyen, A. & Beed, F. (2009). First report of smut on imperata cylindrica caused by sporisorium schweinfurthianum in South Africa. Plant Disease, 93(3), 322-322.en_US
dcterms.extent322-322en_US
dcterms.issued2009en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.subjectsporeen_US
dcterms.subjectinoculationen_US
dcterms.subjectfungusen_US
dcterms.subjectcylindricalen_US
dcterms.subjectsmuten_US
dcterms.subjectinflorescencesen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Stellenboschen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionSouthern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySouth Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryUgandaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ZAen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2UGen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.howPublishedFormally Publisheden_US
cg.issn0191-2917en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record