Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHughes, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBandyopadhyay, Ranajiten_US
dc.contributor.authorMakinde, K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOlembo, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T12:15:03Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-02-06T12:15:03Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/90846en_US
dc.titleInstitutional aspects of sanitary and phytosanitary issues in ECOWAS tradeen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaPOLICIES AND INSTITUTIONSen_US
cg.subject.iitaMARKETSen_US
dcterms.abstractThe Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) has accepted trade liberalization and globalization as important policy directions. West African trade with Europe and the United States is already much greater than trade with other developed countries or intra-regional trade, although trading with developed countries may entail considerable difficulties due to trade regulations and the need to conform to Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) standards. There is generally a low level of awareness of quality standards among produce exporters in West Africa. SPS focal points are not established in all countries, which makes it difficult for exporters to check on standards and requirements. Frequent changes to standards, excessive procedural requirements, high costs for testing and certification, and a lack of transparency in the application of standards combine to compromise the ability of many countries to comply effectively with SPS. Many West African countries have not upgraded their national SPS systems in response to the introduction of the SPS Agreement, leading to differences between local and international standards that makes meeting standards difficult for firms that do business in multiple markets. There also is insufficient testing capability to meet the needs for international trade and a lack of regional coordination. Standards application is not enforced in a number of countries, but others have set up institutions for testing, certification, and quality control of both domestic products and imported goods. The effectiveness of these agencies often is weak due to inadequate equipment, a dearth of skilled technical personnel, inability to assess risks, inadequate laboratory accreditation, and a lack of enforcement.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHughes, J., Bandyopadhyay, R., Makinde, K. & Olembo, S. (2008). Institutional aspects of sanitary and phytosanitary issues in ECOWAS trade. In J.F. Leslie, R. Bandyopadhyay and A. Viscont, Mycotoxins: detection methods, management, public health and agricultural trade, (p. 335-348). Wallingford: CAB International.en_US
dcterms.extentp. 335-348en_US
dcterms.issued2008en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.subjectecowasen_US
dcterms.subjectmarketsen_US
dcterms.subjectsanitary and phytosanitaryen_US
dcterms.subjecttradeen_US
dcterms.typeBook Chapteren_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Ethics and Emerging Technologiesen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationFederal Polytechnic, Bidaen_US
cg.coverage.regionACPen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Americaen_US
cg.coverage.regionNorthern Europeen_US
cg.coverage.countryGhanaen_US
cg.coverage.countryNigeriaen_US
cg.coverage.countrySenegalen_US
cg.coverage.countrySierra Leoneen_US
cg.coverage.countryUnited Statesen_US
cg.coverage.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2GHen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NGen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2SNen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2SLen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2USen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2GBen_US
cg.contributor.donorEuropean Unionen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.isbn978-1-84593-082-0en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record