CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Potential contribution of lablab residues to maize production in moist savanna of West Africa

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Ewansiha, S.U.
    Tarawali, Shirley A.
    Odunze, A.
    Iwuafor, E.
    Date Issued
    2008-08
    Date Online
    2008-01
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Ewansiha, S.U., Tarawali, S., Odunze, A. & Iwuafor, E. (2008). Potential contribution of lablab residues to maize production in moist savanna of West Africa. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 32(3), 393-406.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/90877
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10440040802257181
    Abstract/Description
    Soils of the moist savanna of West Africa are poor in nitrogen; the natural fallow regeneration time has shortened; fertilizer costs and scarcity makes nitrogen (N) fertilizer input inadequate; and crop yields are low. In the region, lablab (Lablab purpureus L., sweet also known as Dolichos lablab L.) has the potential to improve soil quality, provide food, and supply feed simultaneously. In this context, response of maize to N following natural fallow or lablab fallow was investigated in the northern Guinea savanna of Nigeria. Lablab plots were maintained for 2 years—first planted in 2000 and replanted in 2001. In 2001, at the beginning of the growing season and before planting, lablab residues on the plots from 2000 planting were incorporated. In 2002, prior to maize planting, lablab residues on the plots from 2001 planting were also incorporated. Similarly, vegetation on the fallow plots was incorporated. The natural fallow and six lablab accessions of different maturity group formed the main plots with 0 and 60 kg/ha N as subplots in a split plot design with three replicates. Maize (Oba Super 1) in lablab plots grew taller and produced more stover and grain yields than natural fallow. With 0 kg/ha N, maize grain yield from lablab plots was 6.0 t/ha, 57% higher than from natural fallow. Where 60 kg/ha N was applied, maize mean grain yield from lablab plots was 6.6 t/ha, 31% more than from natural fallow plot. Thus, adding N fertilizer to plots formerly grown to lablab enhanced the productivity of subsequent maize. The study showed that late maturing lablab would contribute more to maize production than early maturing lablab when lablab residues are incorporated; without N fertilizer input it would be possible to obtain up to the potential yield of maize with incorporated lablab residues.
    CGIAR Author ORCID iDs
    Shirley Tarawalihttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9398-8780
    AGROVOC Keywords
    fodder; lablab residue; maize grain; maize stover; natural fallow; n fertilizer; savanna
    Subjects
    SOIL INFORMATION; FOOD SECURITY; CROP SYSTEMS; DISEASE CONTROL; DOMESTIC TRADE; FOOD SCIENCE; HANDLING, TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS; LIVELIHOODS; NUTRITION; SOIL FERTILITY; SOIL HEALTH
    Countries
    Nigeria; Ethiopia
    Regions
    Africa; Western Africa; Eastern Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; International Livestock Research Institute; Ahmadu Bello University
    Investors/sponsors
    Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development, Germany
    Collections
    • IITA Journal Articles [4998]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback