Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVanlauwe, Bernarden_US
dc.contributor.authorDiels, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSanginga, Nteranyaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMerckx, R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-23T06:48:57Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-03-23T06:48:57Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/91881en_US
dc.titleLong term integrated soil fertility management in southwestern Nigeria: crop performance and impact on the soil fertility statusen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and advanced research instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaFARM MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRIBUSINESSen_US
cg.subject.iitaAGRONOMYen_US
cg.subject.iitaHANDLING, TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTSen_US
cg.subject.iitaLIVELIHOODSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaFOOD SECURITYen_US
cg.subject.iitaNUTRITIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaSOIL INFORMATIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaSOIL HEALTHen_US
cg.subject.iitaINTEGRATED SOIL FERTILITY MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.subject.iitaCROP SYSTEMSen_US
dcterms.abstractCrop response, tree biomass production and changes in soil fertility characteristics were monitored in a long-term (1986–2002) alley-cropping trial in Ibadan, Nigeria. The systems included two alley cropping systems with Leucaena leucocephala and Senna siamea on the one hand and a control (no-trees) system on the other hand, all cropped annually with a maize–cowpea rotation. All systems had a plus and minus fertilizer treatment. Over the years, the annual biomass return through tree prunings declined steadily, but more drastically for Leucaena than for Senna. In 2002, the nitrogen contribution from Leucaena residues stabilized at about 200 kg N/ha/year, while the corresponding value for Senna was about 160 kg N/ha/year. On average, the four Leucaena prunings were more equal in biomass as well as in amounts of N, P and cations, while the first Sennapruning was always contributing up to 60% of the annual biomass or nutrient return. Maize crop yields declined steadily in all treatments, but the least so in the Senna + fertilizer treatment where in 2002 still 2.2 tonnes/ha of maize were obtained. Nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency was usually higher in the Senna treatment compared to the control or the Leucaena treatment. Added benefits due to the combined use of fertilizer N and organic matter additions were observed only for the Sennatreatment and only in the last 6 years. At all other times, they remained absent or were even negative in the Leucaenatreatments for the first 3 years. Most chemical soil fertility parameters decreased in all the treatments, but less so in the alley cropping systems. The presence of trees had a positive effect on remaining carbon stocks, while they were reduced compared to the 1986 data. Trees had a positive effect on the maintenance of exchangeable cations in the top soil. Exchangeable Ca, Mg and K – and hence ECEC – were only slightly reduced after 16 years of cropping in the tree-based systems, and even increased in the Senna treatments. In the control treatments, values for all these parameters reduced to 50% or less of the original values after 16 years. All the above points to the Senna-based alley system with fertilizers as the more resilient one. This is reflected in all soil fertility parameters, in added benefits due to the combined use of fertilizer nitrogen and organic residue application and in a more stable maize yield over the years, averaging 2.8 tonnes/ha with maximal deviations from the average not exceeding 21%.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationVanlauwe, B., Diels, J., Sanginga, N. & Merckx, R. (2005). Long-term integrated soil fertility management in South-western Nigeria: crop performance and impact on the soil fertility status. Plant and Soil, 273(1-2), 337-354.en_US
dcterms.extentp. 337-354en_US
dcterms.issued2005-06en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dcterms.subjectadded benefitsen_US
dcterms.subjectalley croppingen_US
dcterms.subjectleucaena leucocephalaen_US
dcterms.subjectmaizeen_US
dcterms.subjectnitrogen use efficiencyen_US
dcterms.subjectsenna siameaen_US
dcterms.subjectsoil fertilityen_US
dcterms.subjectfertilizersen_US
dcterms.subjectnutrienten_US
dcterms.subjecthedgerowen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Center for Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationKatholieke Universiteit Leuvenen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-0194-2en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionACPen_US
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.regionEuropeen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Europeen_US
cg.coverage.countryKenyaen_US
cg.coverage.countryNigeriaen_US
cg.coverage.countryBelgiumen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KEen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NGen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BEen_US
cg.contributor.donorDirectorate-General for Development Cooperation and Humanitarian Aid, Belgiumen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.issn0032-079Xen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record