Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHauser, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-24T08:40:12Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-04-24T08:40:12Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/92193en_US
dc.titlePlantain (Musa spp. AAB) bunch yield and root health response to combinations of physical, thermal and chemical sucker sanitation measuresen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen_US
cg.subject.iitaFOOD SECURITYen_US
cg.subject.iitaFARM MANAGEMENTen_US
cg.subject.iitaCLIMATE CHANGEen_US
cg.subject.iitaBANANAen_US
cg.subject.iitaDISEASE CONTROLen_US
cg.subject.iitaLIVELIHOODSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT PRODUCTIONen_US
cg.subject.iitaHANDLING, TRANSPORT, STORAGE AND PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT DISEASESen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT BREEDINGen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT GENETIC RESOURCESen_US
dcterms.abstractPlantain is an important staple food in West and Central Africa and the Congo Basin. The crop is largely grown in extensive 'slash and burn' systems, drawing heavily on the natural resource base, but is low-yielding due to its high susceptibility to a complex of root and corm pests and diseases. Farmers are unaware of nematodes, fungi and banana weevil eggs, and therefore practise virtually no pest or disease control. This study evaluated the effects on plantain bunch yield of factorial combinations of a simple physical sanitation method, paring, followed by five different treatments (control, ash-coating, hot-water treatment, boiling-water treatment and application of the nematicide carbofuran). Paring reduced plantain establishment. It had no effect on fresh bunch yield but reduced uprooting and improved root health status. Without prior paring, bunch yields after the traditional ash-coating (5.7 tonnes ha-1) and nematicide application (6.3 tonnes ha-1) were not significantly different from the control (4.6 tonnes ha-1). Hot-water treatment (12.0 tonnes ha-1) and boiling-water treatment (14.2 tonnes ha-1) increased yield significantly. Boiling-water-treated plantain attained 90 % of the total yield earlier than any other treatment. Yield losses were mainly caused by pseudostem break, whereas uprooting resulted in only minor losses. Yield losses in this study could not be attributed to a particular group of pests or diseases but to all factors contributing to water deficiency which lead to the low turgor that permitted pseudostem break. Root health parameters were positively related to bunch yield and to bunch mass per producing plant. Owing to its simplicity, flexibility, low cost, accelerated production, and absence of negative environmental effects, boiling-water treatment was the most labour-efficient and profitable sucker-sanitising method.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationHauser, S. (2007). Plantain (Musa spp. AAB) bunch yield and root health response to combinations of physical, thermal and chemical sucker sanitation measures. African Plant Protection, 13(1), 1-15.en_US
dcterms.extentp. 1-15en_US
dcterms.issued2007en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.subjectbanana weevilen_US
dcterms.subjectnematodesen_US
dcterms.subjectroot damageen_US
dcterms.subjectpests and diseasesen_US
dcterms.subjectbunch yielden_US
dcterms.subjectpseudostem breaken_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionMiddle Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryCameroonen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2CMen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.volume13en_US
cg.issue1en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record