CGSpaceA Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs
    View Item 
    •   CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
       
    • CGSpace Home
    • International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA)
    • IITA Journal Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Genotype x environment effects on severity of cassava bacterial blight disease caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis

    Thumbnail
    Authors
    Dixon, A.
    Ngeve, J.
    Nukenine, E.
    Date Issued
    2002
    Language
    en
    Type
    Journal Article
    Review status
    Peer Review
    ISI journal
    Accessibility
    Limited Access
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Share
    
    Citation
    Dixon, A., Ngeve, J. & Nukenine, E. (2002). Genotype× environment effects on severity of cassava bacterial blight disease caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 108(8), 763-770.
    Permanent link to cite or share this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10568/92759
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020876019227
    Abstract/Description
    Nine cassava genotypes were grown for three years at six sites representing three agro-ecological zones in Nigeria to study their reaction to cassava bacterial blight (CBB), investigate genotype × environment (G×E) interaction patterns for their reaction to CBB, and to identify genotypes with stability to the disease, using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) statistical model. Environments, genotypes and G×E interactions accounted for71.8%, 12.0% and 16.2% of the treatment sums of squares (SS), and were highly significant (P<0.0001) for the disease, indicating that genotypes responded differentially to CBB infection across environments. Clones 30555,91934, U/41044, and 4(2)1425 showed the least CBB disease ratings. Other clones showed erratic and fluctuating reactions to CBB from environment to environment and were thus considered unstable to the disease. CBB was most severe in 1989 (with a mean score of 2.46) and least so in 1990 (with a score of 2.06). The sites with the most disease were Ibadan, Ilorin and Ubiaja (1989), Ibadan and Ubiaja (1990) and Mokwa (1991). Because of the favourable conditions for disease development at those sites, they could be appropriate for screening cassava genotypes for CBB resistance. The AMMI model selected AMMI1 as the best predictor for CBB because it had the smallest actual root mean square prediction difference (0.37646), and explained 90.7% of the G×E interaction for CBB. The AMMI model was successful in selecting the genotypes 30555, U/41044 and 4(2)1425 and the environments Ibadan 1989, Ilorin 1989 and Onne 1990 with stability of reaction to the disease.
    AGROVOC Keywords
    cassava bacterial blight; xanthomonas campestris manihotis; ammi; genotype × environment interaction; cassava
    Subjects
    CASSAVA; PLANT DISEASES; GENETIC IMPROVEMENT; DISEASE CONTROL; PLANT GENETIC RESOURCES
    Countries
    Nigeria
    Regions
    Africa; Western Africa
    Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
    International Institute of Tropical Agriculture; Institut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement, Cameroon; Université de Ngaoundéré
    Collections
    • IITA Journal Articles [4999]

    Show Statistical Information


    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback
     

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Browse

    All of CGSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subjectThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesBy AGROVOC keywordBy ILRI subjectBy RegionBy CountryBy SubregionBy River basinBy Output typeBy CIP subjectBy CGIAR System subjectBy Alliance Bioversity–CIAT subject

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    AboutPrivacy StatementSend Feedback