Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDixon, A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNgeve, J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNukenine, E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-17T09:03:25Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-05-17T09:03:25Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/92759en_US
dc.titleGenotype x environment effects on severity of cassava bacterial blight disease caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotisen_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country instituteen_US
cg.subject.iitaCASSAVAen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT DISEASESen_US
cg.subject.iitaGENETIC IMPROVEMENTen_US
cg.subject.iitaDISEASE CONTROLen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT GENETIC RESOURCESen_US
dcterms.abstractNine cassava genotypes were grown for three years at six sites representing three agro-ecological zones in Nigeria to study their reaction to cassava bacterial blight (CBB), investigate genotype × environment (G×E) interaction patterns for their reaction to CBB, and to identify genotypes with stability to the disease, using the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) statistical model. Environments, genotypes and G×E interactions accounted for71.8%, 12.0% and 16.2% of the treatment sums of squares (SS), and were highly significant (P<0.0001) for the disease, indicating that genotypes responded differentially to CBB infection across environments. Clones 30555,91934, U/41044, and 4(2)1425 showed the least CBB disease ratings. Other clones showed erratic and fluctuating reactions to CBB from environment to environment and were thus considered unstable to the disease. CBB was most severe in 1989 (with a mean score of 2.46) and least so in 1990 (with a score of 2.06). The sites with the most disease were Ibadan, Ilorin and Ubiaja (1989), Ibadan and Ubiaja (1990) and Mokwa (1991). Because of the favourable conditions for disease development at those sites, they could be appropriate for screening cassava genotypes for CBB resistance. The AMMI model selected AMMI1 as the best predictor for CBB because it had the smallest actual root mean square prediction difference (0.37646), and explained 90.7% of the G×E interaction for CBB. The AMMI model was successful in selecting the genotypes 30555, U/41044 and 4(2)1425 and the environments Ibadan 1989, Ilorin 1989 and Onne 1990 with stability of reaction to the disease.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationDixon, A., Ngeve, J. & Nukenine, E. (2002). Genotype× environment effects on severity of cassava bacterial blight disease caused by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. manihotis. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 108(8), 763-770.en_US
dcterms.extentp. 763-770en_US
dcterms.issued2002en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dcterms.subjectcassava bacterial blighten_US
dcterms.subjectxanthomonas campestris manihotisen_US
dcterms.subjectammien_US
dcterms.subjectgenotype × environment interactionen_US
dcterms.subjectcassavaen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInstitut de Recherche Agricole pour le Développement, Cameroonen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationUniversité de Ngaoundéréen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020876019227en_US
cg.isijournalISI Journalen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryNigeriaen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2NGen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.issn0929-1873en_US
cg.volume108en_US
cg.issue8en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record