| dc.contributor.author | Conceição, H.R. da | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Börner, J. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Wunder, Sven | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-03T11:03:39Z | en_US |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-03T11:03:39Z | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/95818 | en_US |
| dc.title | Why were upscaled incentive programs for forest conservation adopted?: Comparing policy choices in Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru | en_US |
| dcterms.accessRights | Limited Access | en_US |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | da Conceição, H.R., Börner, J., Wunder, S.. 2015. Why were upscaled incentive programs for forest conservation adopted? : Comparing policy choices in Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru. Ecosystem Services, 16 : 243-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.004 | en_US |
| dcterms.issued | 2015-12 | en_US |
| dcterms.language | en | en_US |
| dcterms.publisher | Elsevier BV | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | ecosystem services | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | forest conservation | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | governance | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | policies | en_US |
| dcterms.subject | equity | en_US |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article | en_US |
| cg.subject.cifor | BENEFIT SHARING | en_US |
| cg.subject.cifor | CLIMATE CHANGE | en_US |
| cg.subject.cifor | REDD | en_US |
| cg.identifier.url | https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/5828 | en_US |
| cg.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.004 | en_US |
| cg.coverage.region | South America | en_US |
| cg.coverage.country | Brazil | en_US |
| cg.coverage.country | Ecuador | en_US |
| cg.coverage.country | Peru | en_US |
| cg.contributor.crp | Forests, Trees and Agroforestry | en_US |
| cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2 | BR | en_US |
| cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2 | EC | en_US |
| cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2 | PE | en_US |
