Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNeuenschwander, P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-14T07:37:47Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-09-14T07:37:47Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/97392en_US
dc.titleControl of the cassava mealybug in Africa: lessons from a biological control projecten_US
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centreen_US
cg.subject.iitaCASSAVAen_US
cg.subject.iitaDISEASE CONTROLen_US
cg.subject.iitaPESTS OF PLANTSen_US
cg.subject.iitaPLANT DISEASESen_US
dcterms.abstractDuring the Africa-wide Biological Control project, the neotropical parasitoid Epidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) was established in 26 African countries, causing a satisfactory reduction in the population density of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Mat.-Ferr. (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae) in most farmers' lields. Four conclusions concerning the possible application of the research results to other biological control projects are discussed. (1) Foreign exploration was intensive and should be maintained at this level in other projects, if necessary at the cost of other activities. (2) In the controversy about the amount of research needed before the lirst releases are made, understanding the proper role of quarantine is essential. While quarantine (preferably outside the continent) guarantees nonnoxiousness of natural enemies, only research in the experimental release sites can determine whether a given natural enemy will ·be efficient. The topic of how released exotic insects affect the diversity of the indigenous fauna is also addressed. Modalities used in this project for executing releases, always on request by and in collaboration with national programmes, are recommended for adoption in future projects. (3) Laboratory and field studies, sometimes leading to simulation models, established the scientific basis for quantifying the impact of the pest insect and its biological control. This was expressed as reduction in pest population levels and yield loss, as well as gain in revenue. Such studies are needed in order to attribute the observed effects to various causes and to advance the science of biological control. ( 4) It is concluded that biological control is the basis ofiPM but cannot usually be manipulated by the farmer. Interventions such as cultural methods or the use of resistant varieties need to be compatible with biological control. This is usually so~ unless resistances are very strong.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationNeuenschwander, P. (1994). Control of the cassava mealybug in Africa: lessons from a biological control project. African Crop Science Journal, 2(4), 369-383.en_US
dcterms.issued1994en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.subjectbiological controlen_US
dcterms.subjectphenacoccus manihotien_US
dcterms.subjectcassavaen_US
dcterms.subjectmealybugsen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Institute of Tropical Agricultureen_US
cg.coverage.regionAfricaen_US
cg.coverage.regionWestern Africaen_US
cg.coverage.countryBeninen_US
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2BJen_US
cg.contributor.donorInternational Development Research Centreen_US
cg.contributor.donorDeutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeiten_US
cg.contributor.donorAfrican Development Banken_US
cg.contributor.donorEuropean Unionen_US
cg.contributor.donorInternational Fund for Agricultural Developmenten_US
cg.contributor.donorUnited Nations Development Programmeen_US
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen_US
cg.issn1021-9730en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record