Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTirupathi, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShashidhar, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Vishnu P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T06:38:29Zen_US
dc.date.available2018-12-17T06:38:29Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/98592en_US
dc.titleFuzzy-based approach for evaluating groundwater sustainability of Asian citiesen_US
dcterms.abstractThe objective of this research is to develop a fuzzy-based groundwater sustainability index (FGSI) model to evaluate the sustainability of groundwater system at selected cities in Asian. The new Mamdani type fuzzy-based inference system known as FGSI was developed. It contains five components and twenty-four indicators, which covers five dimensions of sustainability, namely, environmental, social, economic, mutual trust, and institutional. The FGSI model offers a novel combination of indicators, which covers aspects of groundwater quality, quantity, and management. An attempt was made to develop a robust index for estimating the groundwater sustainability. The model was evaluated for selected cities in Asian with different difuzzification methods, and compared with the conventional method. The centroid defuzzification method produced well diversified results compared with other methods, including conventional method. The overall groundwater sustainability of Hyderabad of India was estimated as highly sustainable and, Lahore of Pakistan, Bangkok of Thailand, Ho Chi Minh City of Vietnam and Yangon City of Myanmar were estimated as moderately sustainable. The FGSI model may help to policy and decision makers to provide a reliable and resilient sustainable management system in the cities by identifying the indicators for the improvement.en_US
dcterms.accessRightsLimited Accessen_US
dcterms.bibliographicCitationTirupathi, C.; Shashidhar, T.; Pandey, Vishnu P.; Shrestha, S. 2018. Fuzzy-based approach for evaluating groundwater sustainability of Asian cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 44:321-331. (Online first) doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.027en_US
dcterms.extent44:321-331. (Online first)en_US
dcterms.issued2019-01en_US
dcterms.languageenen_US
dcterms.licenseAll rights reserved; self-archive copy onlyen_US
dcterms.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dcterms.subjectwater resourcesen_US
dcterms.subjectgroundwateren_US
dcterms.subjectsustainabilityen_US
dcterms.subjectevaluationen_US
dcterms.subjecttownsen_US
dcterms.subjectmodelsen_US
dcterms.subjectfuzzy logicen_US
dcterms.subjectwater stressen_US
dcterms.subjectinstitutionsen_US
dcterms.typeJournal Articleen_US
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Instituteen_US
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.09.027en_US
cg.contributor.crpWater, Land and Ecosystemsen_US
cg.journalSustainable Cities and Societyen_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record