Table of Contents CGIAR Financial Report 2000 OVERVIEW: 29 YEARS OF CGIAR INVESTMENT 27 (1972–2000) FINANCIAL REPORT 2000 28 Introduction Overall Financial Outcome Composition of Funding Sources of Funding Program Investments Center Highlights Co-Sponsor Support Financial Position 2000 CGIAR FUNDING 28 28 28 28 28 28 29 29 33 CGIAR Contributions Evolution of 2000 Support to the Approved Research Agenda Overall Financial Outcome Contribution Profile Disbursements Center Perspective Funding Modalities Unrestricted Support Restricted Support Co-Sponsor Support World Bank Support AGENDA RESOURCES 33 33 34 34 36 39 41 41 41 41 41 44 Allocation of Resources By Undertaking By Region By Object of Expenditure Cost Changes CGIAR Investments over 29 Years FINANCIAL POSITION 44 44 44 44 45 45 50 Net Assets Unappropriated Net Assets Appropriated Net Assets Net Fixed Assets Capital Purchase Fund Liquidity Current Ratio Working Capital COMPLIANCE WITH FINANCIAL GUIDELINES 50 53 53 53 53 53 56 56 58 Acronyms and Abbreviations 26 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 23 Table of Figures, Tables, and Boxes Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12a Figure 12b Figure 12c Figure 12d Figure 12e Figure 12f Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Figure 19 Figure 20 Figure 21 Box 1 Box 2 Table 1 Table 2 Table 3 Table 4 CGIAR funding, 1996–2000 Agenda contributions by Member group, 1999–2000 Contributions by Center and Member group, 2000 Top 13 contributors, 2000 Center support by top 13 contributors, 2000 Disbursement of funds, 2000 Funding by Center, 2000 Funding outcomes vs. financing plans, 2000 Changes in Center funding, 1999–2000 Agenda funding by funding type, 2000 Distribution of World Bank support, 2000 Investments in CGIAR undertakings, 2000 Center investments in increasing productivity Center investments in protecting the environment Center investments in saving biodiversity Center investments in improving policies Center investments in strengthening NARS CGIAR allocations by developing region, 2000 CGIAR expenditure by object, 2000 Net assets by Center, 2000 Unappropriated net assets by Center, 2000 Net fixed assets by Center, 2000 Capital purchase fund by Center, 2000 Member receivables by Center, 2000 CGIAR System current ratio, 1996–2000 Working capital by Center, 1999–2000 33 34 35 37 37 38 38 39 40 40 42 45 46 46 47 47 48 49 49 50 51 51 54 54 55 55 Annual Financial Decisionmaking Process and Schedule 31 Financial Concepts and Terminology 32 CGIAR Financial Highlights, 1996–2000 Contributions by Other Donors, 1999 and 2000 Allocation of World Bank Funding, 1999–2000 CGIAR System Financial Position, 1996–2000 30 36 43 52 24 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ANNEX TABLES Table A1.1 Table A1.2 Table A2.1 Table A2.2 Table A2.3a Table A2.3b Table A2.4a Table A2.4b Table A2.5 Table A2.6 Table A2.7 Table A2.8 Table A3.1 Table A3.2 Table A3.3 Table A3.4 Table A3.5 Table A3.6 Table A3.7 Table A4.1 Table A4.2 Table A5.1 Table A5.2 Table A6.1 Table A6.2 Table A6.3 Table A6.4 Table A6.5 Table A6.6 Table A6.7 Table A6.8 Table A6.9 Table A6.10 Table A6.11 Table A6.12 Table A6.13 Table A6.14 Table A6.15 Table A6.16 Table A6.17 CGIAR Contributions to the Approved Research Agenda by Member, 1972–2000 CGIAR Contributions to the Approved Research Agenda by Center, 1972–2000 Ranking Contributions to the CGIAR Research Agenda, 1997–2000 CGIAR Funding by Member, 2000 Support to the Agreed Research Agenda by Member by Center, 2000 Member Support to the Approved Research Agenda by Center, 2000 Monthly Disbursement of Funding by Member, 2000 Member Contributions Disbursed through the World Bank, 1999–2000 CGIAR Funding by Center, 2000 Funding Outcome by Center, 2000 CGIAR System Grants by Center, 1996–2000 World Bank Funding by Center, 1996–2000 CGIAR Investments by Center, 1996–2000 CGIAR Research Agenda Investments by Activity, 1996–2000 Centers’ Research Agenda Investments by Activity, 2000 Regional Allocations, 2000 CGIAR Object Expenditures, 2000 CGIAR Staffing, 1996–2000 Centers’ Inflation Rates, 1996–2000 Centers’ Financial Positions, 2000 Capital Investments by Centers, 1996–2000 CGIAR Total Investments, 1972–2000 CGIAR Total Expenditures and Sources of Revenue, 1991–2000 CGIAR Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 CIAT Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 CIFOR Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 CIMMYT Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 CIP Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 ICARDA Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 ICLARM Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 ICRAF Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 ICRISAT Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 IFPRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 IITA Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 ILRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 IPGRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 IRRI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 ISNAR Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 IWMI Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 WARDA Program and Research Highlights, 1996–2000 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 25 Acronyms and Abbreviations ADB AFDB ASB CGIAR Asian Development Bank African Development Bank Alternatives to Slash and Burn Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research DAC Development Assistance Committee (OECD) EC European Commission FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GHG Greenhouse gases GNP Gross national product HIV/AIDS Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immune deficiency syndrome ICW International Centers Week (CGIAR) IDRC International Development Research Centre IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IMF International Monetary Fund IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPM Integrated Pest Management MTM Mid-Term Meeting (CGIAR) MTP Medium-term plan (CGIAR) NARS National agricultural research system(s) NGO Nongovernmental organization ODA Official Development Assistance OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development PwC Pricewaterhouse Coopers SGRP Systemwide Genetic Resources Program SPIA Standing Panel on Impact Assessment TAC Technical Advisory Committee (CGIAR) TIGR The Institute for Genomic Research UNDP United Nations Development Programme USAID United States Agency for International Development 26 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Overview: 29 Years of CGIAR Investment (1972–2000) This 29-year time series analysis of CGIAR investments confirms expected trends and reveals some less obvious patterns as well. As expected, the oldest Centers account for the largest share of the total $6.3 billion invested. On the high end, IRRI and IITA account for 13 percent and 12 percent of the total, respectively. CIAT and CIMMYT each account for 11 percent of the total. ICRISAT and ILRI, the livestock enterprise, and its predecessors ILCA and ILRAD, each account for 10 percent of the total; ICARDA and CIP account for 8 percent and 7 percent, respectively. The remaining eight Centers together account for 18 percent of investment. At the Center level, investment levels have stabilized. Increasing productivity has been the largest component, totaling 54 percent overall. Since the early 1990s, however, this undertaking has been receiving a smaller proportion of funds, so that by 2000 it accounted for only 36 percent of all investments. An increasing share of funding has been directed to environmental, biodiversity, and policy undertakings. Of interest, and perhaps of some surprise, is the steady investment, totaling 21 percent overall, in strengthening of NARS. Recent trends in total production sector and commodity investments confirm that natural resource management increasingly has become a focus of CGIAR activity. By far the largest commodity group has been cereals, which accounts for 45 percent of commodity-sector investments. Of that group, rice has accounted for nearly half of the investment—$1.1 billion (20 percent overall). Wheat and maize each accounted for about $0.5 billion (9 percent). In 2000, cereal expenditures remained at 39 percent. Legumes and roots, or tubers, each accounted for 15 percent to 16 percent of commodity-sector investments; these shares have varied little. In the production sectors, the share of investments in crops and livestock has been falling, while that in forestry and fisheries has been climbing. Sub-Saharan Africa has received the largest regional share of investments, accounting for $2.6 billion (42 percent of total expenditure). That share has been fairly constant over time. Investments in Asia, mainly in crops, have been $1.9 billion (30 percent). If the majority of investments in livestock are subtracted from the CGIAR's total investments in Africa, crop investments in Africa approximately equal those in Asia during the 29-year period. Object-of-expenditure data reveal two interesting trends. First, investments in CGIAR capital assets were relatively much higher in the early years, when the Centers’ physical plants were established. But as a share of total investment, these investments have decreased from 24 percent in the first five-year period to 5 percent (represented by depreciation) in 2000. Second, personnel costs decreased from 55 percent of the total expenditure in the mid-1980s to 49 percent in 2000. This percentage reduction is significant in dollar terms because of the large overall share of personnel costs ($3.3 billion). ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 27 Financial Report 2000 Introduction The funding goal for 2000 was to attain the level of funding approved at ICW99: $340 million. CGIAR Members contributed $331 million—$9 million (3 percent) less than the approved funding goal but $1 million more than actual funding of $330 million for 1999. The primary reason for the shortfall was the reduced dollar value of contributions arising from weaker European currencies. OVERALL FINANCIAL OUTCOME PROGRAM INVESTMENTS Member funding of $331 million, Center-generated income of $14 million, and extraordinary European Commission (EC) relief funding of $5 million ($2 million from reserves; and $3 million in an advance of 2001 funding) totaled $350 million in funding to Centers. Eighteen percent of this contribution remained unpaid by the end of the year, however, forcing Centers to curtail expenditures. Total expenditures in 2000 were $338 million. The resulting surplus of $12 million replenished the Systems’ aggregate unappropriated net assets that had been depleted by $7 million in 1999 because of the funding default. Included in the $12 million surplus is an advance of $3 million of 2001 income and a transfer of $2 million from System reserves to Center reserves. COMPOSITION OF FUNDING In 2000, unrestricted support was 50 percent ($164 million) of total support, compared with 54 percent ($179 million) in 1999. Restricted support was $167 million (50 percent) of total Member funding, compared with $151 million (46 percent) in 1999. SOURCES OF FUNDING Program investments in 2000 were $338 million, a decrease of $9 million (3 percent) from 1999. Distribution of resources by undertaking was consistent with the 2000financing plan. Efforts to increase productivity, the major thrust of CGIAR activities, accounted for 36 percent of total investments (up from 34 percent in 1999). Within this undertaking, crops accounted for 71 percent of investment, livestock for 13 percent, forestry for 12 percent, and fisheries for 4 percent. Within increasing productivity, investments in germplasm enhancement and in production systems development increased marginally. Investment in protecting the environment accounted for 18 percent of total investment (down from 20 percent in 1999). Investment in policy research increased from 13 percent to 14 percent. Investment in biodiversity preservation remained at 10 percent. Investment to strengthen NARS decreased from 23 percent to 22 percent. In 2000, there were no changes in investment by region. Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia, West Asia and North Africa (WANA), and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) accounted for 42 percent, 32 percent, 17 percent, and 9 percent of total investment, respectively. The trend of lower expenditures for personnel costs continued. In 2000, personnel expenditures decreased to 49 percent of total expenditures from 50 percent in 1999. In absolute terms, these expenditures decreased from $172 million in 1999 to $164 million in 2000. In percentage terms, they represent a 7 percent decrease from the 1994–95 average of 56 percent. CENTER HIGHLIGHTS The total CGIAR Membership was 58, of which the number of contributing Members was 55. Uganda was a new contributor in 2000. Industrialized countries provided $225 million (68 percent) of total support in 2000. This figure was in line with the 1999 amount of $226 million (68 percent) of the total. International organizations and foundations contributed $73 million or 22 percent (1999: $74 million or 22 percent), and developing countries and other donors contributed the remaining $33 million or 10 percent (1999: $30 million or 10 percent). Funding for four Centers was at or above levels approved at ICW99. They were CIMMYT, $4.9 million (up 15 percent); IRRI, $3.8 million (up 13 percent); CIP , $2.5 million (up 14 percent); and CIFOR, $0.2 million (up 2 percent). Funding for eight Centers was within 10 percent of, and thus broadly in line with, financing plan targets: ICARDA, $0.3 million (down 1 percent); ICRAF, $1.1 million (down 5 percent); ICRISAT, $1.4 million (down 6 percent); IPGRI, $1.4 million (down 6 percent); ISNAR, $0.7 million, (down 7 percent); IFPRI, $1.8 million (down 8 percent); CIAT, $3.2 million (down 10 percent); and IITA $3.1 million (down 10 percent). 28 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Funding for the four remaining Centers was 10 percent or more outside their financing plan targets: IWMI, $1.3 million (down 13 percent); ICLARM, $2.5 million (down 17 percent); ILRI, $4.9 million (down 17 percent) and WARDA, $3.7 million (down 31 percent). These shortfalls primarily reflect lower-than-expected funding from other CGIAR investors and slower-than-planned project implementation. CO-SPONSOR SUPPORT The World Bank contributed $45 million to the CGIAR research program in 2000. Bank support amounted to 14 percent of total CGIAR support. In addition, the Bank funded the annual operating costs of the CGIAR Secretariat ($4.25 million) and contributed $0.75 million to TAC. Total support from the Bank, therefore, amounted to $50 million in 2000, the same as in 1999. FAO and UNDP provided $0.6 million and $0.4 million respectively in support of TAC/SPIA. They provided $0.2 million and $1.8 million respectively directly to Centers. FINANCIAL POSITION of 2000 were $203 million (1999: $263 million). The decrease in net assets is primarily explained by the writedown of $74 million in fixed assets following a change in accounting policy. Therefore the decrease represents a book movement. Net assets are made up of $62 million (1999: $44 million) in unappropriated net assets and $141 million (1999: $219 million) in appropriated net assets. Appropriated net assets can be further subdivided into capital invested in fixed assets ($98 million) and funds set aside by Centers for the acquisition of fixed assets ($43 million). Cash and cash-equivalent balances equaled $177 million at the end of 2000 (1999: $212 million). This figure includes $26 million in cash and investments disclosed under longterm assets. The primary reason for the reduction in year-end cash holding was the reduction ($44 million) in donations received in advance. The cash balance of $177 million represents 192 days of expenditures. The current ratio is 1.74. Capital investments totaled $15 million in 2000. At the end of 2000, 18 percent of the value of 2000 agenda contributions ($61 million), or two months of income, was outstanding as accounts receivable from Members. The 2000 financial data confirm that the CGIAR as a whole is in a strong financial condition. Total net assets at the end ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 29 Table 1 CGIAR Financial Highlights, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 A. Resource summary (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda Total Agenda 332 1% 320 5% 13 Total 333 0% Total 340 2% 13 353 337 16 100% 47% 54 Total 330 (3%) 12 342 349 (7) 100% 46% 55 Total 331 0% 14 5 350 338 12 100% 50% 55 CGIAR contributions 304 Annual change (percent) 13% Other revenue 14 Finance Committee EC allocation Total revenue System expenditure 325 Net surplus/(deficit) Agenda funding, percent of total Restricted funding, percent of total Number of contributing CGIAR Members B. Expenditure share profile (percent) CGIAR undertakings Increasing productivity Protecting the environment Saving biodiversity Improving policies Strengthening NARS Region Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Object Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation C. CGIAR staff (number) International staff Other staff Total staff D. CGIAR financial indicators Unappropriated net assets (U.S. dollars) Unappropriated net assets in Days (revenue) Appropriated net assets (U.S. dollars) Net fixed assets (U.S. dollars) Current ratio Memo notes: Centers’ cost deflator (1999=1.00) 346 355 (9) 92% 41% 44 333 346 346 0 96% 39% 50 40% 16% 11% 12% 21% 38% 33% 17% 12% 53% 34% 7% 6% 40% 17% 11% 11% 21% 40% 31% 17% 12% 51% 36% 7% 6% 37% 19% 11% 12% 21% 40% 32% 18% 10% 50% 37% 7% 6% 34% 20% 10% 13% 23% 42% 32% 17% 9% 50% 38% 7% 5% 36% 18% 10% 14% 22% 42% 32% 17% 9% 49% 39% 7% 5% 897 9,416 10,313 862 8,295 9,157 892 7,578 8,470 907 7,701 8,608 873 7,642 8,515 45 48 277 231 1.6 43 45 273 232 1.7 52 54 271 227 1.8 44 49 219 174 1.6 62 67 141 98 1.7 0.92 0.95 0.98 1.00 1.00 Note: Excludes a contribution of $5 million from the World Bank to cover the cost of the CGIAR Secretariat and TAC. 30 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Box 1 Annual Financial Decisionmaking Process and Schedule Introduction of Research Agenda (October). The CGIAR’s Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) introduces the research agenda at the International Centers Week (ICW). Planning, including revision of estimates of resource requirements, thus begins approximately 14 months before the start of activity. Submission of Centers’ Medium-Term Plans (March). Centers prepare and submit threeyear, medium-term plans (MTPs). These plans update original proposals, taking into account current activity, changes in the research environment, and subsequent plan modifications (which may be introduced in the third year of the period covered by the plans). Discussion of Proposed Plans (April). The Centers and the TAC discuss the proposed MTPs. Setting of Agenda (May). At the mid-term meeting (MTM), the TAC proposes the next year’s research agenda on the basis of three-year plans presented by the Centers. The CGIAR debates the TAC’s recommendations, taking into consideration advice from the Finance Committee on funding prospects, and endorses the proposed research agenda and financial allocations, with or without modification. Following the MTM, the Members indicate general levels of financing so that the Centers can prepare their financing plans. Preparation of Financing Plans (June–September). Centers prepare their individual financing plans for the following year on the basis of financing information solicited through bilateral contacts with Members. World Bank funding is reflected in the plans on a percentage basis of funding secured by Centers from their Members—11.5 percent in 1999 and 12 percent in 2000. Confirmation of Program Content (mid-September). On the basis of interactions with their Members, Centers determine whether any changes in funding for the research agenda are expected. They communicate these changes and their implications for program content to the TAC and the CGIAR Secretariat. The TAC reviews this content and highlights the need for any significant CGIAR action at ICW. Review of Financing Plans (end of September to beginning of October). Following confirmation of program content by the TAC, the Finance Committee reviews Center financing plans on the basis of funding information solicited by the CGIAR Secretariat. During this effort, the Committee scrutinizes the consistency and feasibility of the proposed World Bank contribution to each Center’s funds. Approval of Research Agenda and Financing Plans (October). At ICW, the CGIAR reviews and approves the finalized research agenda and Center financing plans for the following year. Implementation of Agenda and Disbursement of Funds (January–December). Centers commence implementation of the research agenda on January 1, and Members disburse funds to the Centers throughout the year. Preparation of Financial Statements (December). At the end of the calendar year, Centers prepare audited financial statements showing the use of the funds received in support of the research agenda ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 31 Box 2 Financial Concepts and Terminology Research Agenda. The research agenda is made up of all the Center activities. One or more Centers may execute these activities jointly with national agricultural research systems (NARS), advanced research institutions, or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs). Centers develop the agenda and conduct programs in collaboration with partners. The TAC reviews the agenda and, if appropriate, recommends it for CGIAR financing. Projects included in the agenda should: I Aim to produce research or research-related international public goods (including training) I Be of high priority with regard to accomplishment of the CGIAR’s goals and objectives I Have acceptable probabilities of success, and I Have no alternative producers or sources of supply with suitable costs or reliability. Agenda Financing. The research agenda, as endorsed by the CGIAR, is eligible for financing by Members, including the World Bank. The approved financial requirements are the minimum financial requirements for implementing the agenda. All Centers and partners are encouraged to maximize financing. Mechanisms to ensure that the agenda is fully funded have evolved from unsuccessful attempts to “guarantee” full financing through the sole use of World Bank funds. Members, instead of the World Bank alone, now act collectively to fill any financial gaps that might arise in the course of the year. Financing Modalities. Centers are primarily financed through annual support from CGIAR Members. Modest amounts are also available from Centers’ annual miscellaneous income, including ad hoc contributions from organizations that are not CGIAR Members. Member financing may be unrestricted and directed to the CGIAR with flexibility regarding allocation based on CGIAR priorities; or to Centers, or to programs. Alternatively, Member financing may be restricted and directed to a specific Center program, project, subproject, or activity as defined in a contractual agreement. All Members are expected to help pay the full cost of Center operations, including administrative costs, of which they must bear a proportionate share. World Bank financing always is made available as general CGIAR support. All Members are encouraged to provide their support in a similar manner. Members usually disburse funds directly to Centers throughout the year. The CGIAR Secretariat provides disbursement services, through the World Bank, to Members that prefer to make an annual disbursement. CGIAR Agenda Matrix. The distribution of financial resources is presented as the CGIAR research agenda matrix. Activities are divided into five groups representing the principal undertakings and outputs of the CGIAR. The matrix reflects the full allocation of Center project costs among the CGIAR activities. Projects are the basic units of activity. Approximately 250 projects were ongoing in 2000. The CGIAR has identified and implemented several systemwide programs to respond to specific challenges and strengthen collaboration among Centers and with partners. Implementation. Centers implement the research agenda in partnership with advanced institutions, NGOs, and NARS. These joint ventures might involve shared tasks at different points on the research and development continuum, from laboratory-based research to field-level experimentation. Funding of such ventures is included in financing for the CGIAR research agenda. 32 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH 2000 CGIAR Funding CGIAR CONTRIBUTIONS In the year 2000 CGIAR Members contributed $331 million in support of the research agenda (see box 2 on page 32). This figure represents a decrease of $9 million (3 percent) from the approved financing plan target of $340 million. It also represents an increase of $1 million (0.3 percent) from actual support of $330 million in 1999. Figure 1 shows CGIAR funding from 1996 to 2000. Annex 2 presents details of Members’ support as well as individual receipts by Center. Annex table A2.1 ranks CGIAR contributions by Member to the research agenda for the period from 1997 to 2000. Annex table A2.2 presents 2000 CGIAR funding by Member (both unrestricted support and restricted support). Annex table A2.3 presents the amount of funds provided by each Member to each Center in support of their approved programs. EVOLUTION SUPPORT RESEARCH TO OF 2000 APPROVED THE AGENDA At the ICW in October 1999, the Finance Committee recommended, and the CGIAR approved, a financing plan of $340 million for 2000. The CGIAR emphasized that the $340 million was not a ceiling and encouraged Members to allocate additional support if possible. On the other hand, it urged Centers to exercise caution in spending, and to plan on the basis of identified funding. By the MTM in May 2000, updates from Centers indicated that funding for the research agenda, at the aggregate level, would be at about $352 million. However, the financing plan was maintained at the $340 million level because of concerns about funding risks arising from weak European currencies. At ICW99, the Centers reconfirmed that aggregate funding would be in the $340 million range. Funding from individual Members continued to be in line with earlier expectations. However, weaker European currencies reduced the dollar value of contributions; consequently the actual 2000 results were likely to be in the range of $330 million to $335 million. At the Center level, 14 Centers were expecting to receive funding equaling or exceeding that specified in their financing plans. Two Centers—ISNAR and ILRI—were projecting funding to be 12 percent and 5 percent, respectively, less than that specified in their approved financing plans. It was noted Figure 1 CGIAR funding, 1996–2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 350 Total 300 Research agenda 250 200 150 100 50 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 33 that disbursements by Members were running behind schedule. The Finance Committee and the group of Centers urged Members to accelerate disbursements of funds to Centers. OVERALL FINANCIAL OUTCOME CONTRIBUTION PROFILE Member funding of $331 million, Center-generated income of $14 million, and extraordinary funding of $5 million totaled $350 million in funding to Centers. Total expenditures in 2000, including expenditures on CGIAR Committees but excluding CGIAR Secretariat and TAC expenditures, were $338 million. Therefore, the operating surplus for Centers as a whole was $12 million. This surplus, however, incorporates a transfer of $2 million from CGIAR systemwide reserves and an advance of $3 million on 2001 income. By comparison, the CGIAR had an operating deficit of $7 million in 1999. In 2000, 14 Centers had operating surpluses: IRRI ($2.7 million), ICLARM ($2.4 million), IPGRI ($1.9 million), ICRAF ($1.6 million), CIAT ($1.2 million), IFPRI ($1.1 million), CIP ($0.9 million), ISNAR ($0.8 million), IWMI ($0.3 million), ICARDA ($0.3 million), ICRISAT ($0.2 million), CIFOR ($0.2 million), CIMMYT ($0.2 million), and IITA ($0.2 million). Two Centers had operating deficits: ILRI ($1.6 million) and WARDA ($0.6 million). The ILRI deficit represents the reversal of a 1999 surplus that had resulted from a 1999 special allocation ($1.5 million) from the Finance Committee. This surplus, received and unspent in 1999, was expensed in 2000. Total CGIAR Membership was 58, of which in 2000 the number of contributing CGIAR Members remained at 55. Uganda was a new contributor in 2000. The average contribution for the CGIAR Membership as a whole remained constant at $6 million. The 58 Members can be divided into four groups: industrialized countries (21), developing countries (22), foundations (3), and international and regional organizations (12). For analytical purposes, industrialized countries can be further subdivided along geographical lines into three subgroups: Europe, North America, and the Pacific Rim. Trends associated with any of the groups should not be interpreted as policy decisions by the groups, because contributions to the CGIAR are voluntary, and each Member decides the amount and recipients of its contributions. Figure 2 compares the composition of funding for 2000 with that for 1999. Figure 3 presents the composition of funding by Center and Member group in 2000. Overall funding rose by $1 million (0.3 percent) from 1999. The $1 million funding increase comprises $2.5 million from Europe, $1.8 million from North America, and $4.2 million from other donors, which were offset in part by decreases of $4.9 million from the Pacific Rim, $1.4 million from international and regional organizations, and $1 million from developing countries. Europe’s share of contributions—$128 million—remained constant at 39 percent of total funding in 2000. Contributions Figure 2 Agenda contributions by Member group, 1999–2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999 2000 Europe Europe International and regional organizations Developing countries Pacific Rim Non-CGIAR North America Foundations International and regional organizations Developing countries Pacific Rim Non-CGIAR North America Foundations 34 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH were higher in national currency terms, in the aggregate, as the European Commission resumed its funding. However, these increases did not result in higher dollar contributions because of the devaluation of the euro against the dollar during 2000. Within the European group there was a large increase in European Commission funding ($16.3 million) over 1999. Other increases were received from the Netherlands ($2.1 million) and from the United Kingdom ($1 million). These increases were offset in part by decreases from Germany ($5.3 million), Switzerland ($4.5 million), Denmark ($3 million), Belgium ($2.1 million), and Sweden ($0.9 million). Many of the decreases in European Member funding reflect not only large exchange losses but also the timing of the flow of funds for restricted projects. The decrease in funding from Germany reflects a reduction of 50 percent of unrestricted funding ($3 million) from that country. North America’s contributions increased marginally by $1.8 million to $53.5 million, and its share of total contributions remained at 16 percent. The decrease in contributions from the Pacific Rim, down from $48 million in 1999 to $44 million in 2000, reflects a decrease of $5 million from Japan and a small increase of $0.5 million from Australia and New Zealand. The fall in Japan’s contribution resulted from a reduction in funding of 3 percent ($1 million) and an exchange loss ($4 million) following the devaluation of the yen against the U.S. dollar. Contributions from Australia and New Zealand—$8.5 mil- lion and $0.5 million, respectively—increased by 0.4 million and $0.1 million respectively from 1999. Following the pattern of the last several years, developing countries together accounted for 4 percent of Member contributions. Total contributions from these countries decreased from $14.7 million (4.3 percent) in 1999 to $13.7 million (4.1 percent) in 2000, a decrease of $1 million (6 percent). Colombia maintained its position as the largest contributor among the developing countries for the fifth year in a row with its contribution in 2000 of $2.3 million. Uganda made a first-time contribution of $0.3 million. Mexico maintained its support at $1.8 million, and Nigeria contributed $1 million, down from $1.6 million in 1999. China increased its support from $0.7 million to $1 million, and South Africa increased its support by $0.1 million to $0.6 million. Contributions from international organizations decreased by $1.4 million to $66.3 million. Decreases in funding were received from the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) (down $1.1 million), African Development Bank (AFDB) (down $1.1 million), International Development Research Centre (IDRC) (down $0.7 million), the Arab Fund (down $0.2 million), and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) (down $0.3 million). These decreases were offset in part by an increase in funding from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) (up $1.6 million). Among international organizations the World Bank remained the largest investor in the CGIAR, at $45 million. Figure 3 Contributions by Center and Member group, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 Non-CGIAR 25 Foundations 20 15 10 5 0 CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA International and regional organizations Developing countries Pacific Rim North America Europe ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 35 Table 2 Contributions by Other Donors, 1999 and 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1999 CGIAR Members Multidonor projects Non-CGIAR Members Foundations Non-Member developing countries Private sector Common fund for commodities NGOs/UN organizations Other miscellaneous Subtotal Total Note: “Other” includes miscellaneous funding from a wide variety of sources. 2000 4.7 3.7 3.0 2.2 1.3 1.3 1.0 2.5 11.3 15.0 4.4 2.7 2.1 1.0 1.3 3.0 14.5 19.2 With contributions of $6 million and $5.8 respectively, the ADB and the IFAD were the second and third largest investors in this category. With the exception of contributions from the World Bank, all contributions from international organizations are restricted. The year-to-year funding fluctuations reflect changing start and finish dates for restricted projects. Contributions from other donors increased by $4.2 million, from $15 million in 1999 to $19.2 million in 2000, and now make up 5.8 percent of the total funding. Table 2 indicates the contributions of these donors in 1999 and 2000. Multidonor projects are multiyear projects funded by a number of donors, all of whom are Members of the CGIAR. Contributions from individual donors cannot be separately identified in any given year. These contributions account for almost 25 percent of the increase ($1 million) of $4.2 million in funding from other donors. Contributions from foundations include contributions from Nippon, Novartis, Sasakawa, Neys-van Hoogs, Gatsby, Hilton, and the MacArthur Foundation. Non-Member country contributions include contributions from Bolivia, Honduras, Malawi, Mozambique, Turkey, Nicaragua, Ethiopia, Eritrea, and the Republic of Yemen. They are largely funded by loans or credits, or both, from the World Bank. Private sector contributions primarily include contributions, for collaborative work, from Latin American agricultural producers. Other miscellaneous contributions include contributions from a wide variety of organizations, including the International Tropical Timber Organization, the International Institute of Biological Control, and the European Environmental Agency. In 2000, 75 percent of the CGIAR’s total funding was again provided by the top 13 contributors to the CGIAR. These same 13 Members also contributed 92 percent of the CGIAR total unrestricted funding. Figure 4 illustrates the level of their support. The resumption of EC funding brought the EC back into the top 13. Figure 5 illustrates support by these top 13 contributors as a percentage of Center total funding. DISBURSEMENTS The pace of disbursement continues to present a challenge to the Centers’ cash flow. Figure 6 compares Member disbursements in 1999 and 2000 with a normative pattern of monthly expenditures. By the end of 2000, only 82 percent of funds had been disbursed, compared with 89 percent in 1999. Dollar receipts decreased from $293 million in 1999 to $271 million in 2000 as more than $60 million was unpaid as of 36 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 4 Top 13 contributors, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars Norway Australia Sweden Germany Denmark Canada Netherlands United Kingdom Switzerland European Commission Japan United States World Bank 0 10 20 30 40 50 Figure 5 Center support by top 13 contributors, 2000 Percentages 100 80 60 40 20 Restricted Unrestricted 0 R YT AT CI CIFO MM CI P DA RM RAF ISAT CI AR CLA IC ICR IC I RI IFP IITA I I ILR PGR I I I R A IRR NA IWM ARD IS W ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 37 Figure 6 Disbursement of funds, 2000 Cumulative percentages 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% January March May July September November Normative levels 1999 actual levels 2000 actual levels Figure 7 Funding by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 YT MM I C I IRR AT CI IITA I ILR RI DA AT RAF IPG CAR CRIS IC I I RI IFP P CI I R R A FO LARM IWM SNA ARD CI I W IC 38 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH December 31, 2000. At year-end, therefore, Centers were “owed” more than $60 million by CGIAR Members. The primary reasons for continuation in 2000 of the poor disbursement situation were increasing delays in the timing of disbursements by some of the major contributors and the funding on a reimbursable basis of some targeted grants (as targeted funding increases as a percentage of total funding, the associated disbursement of funds will decelerate). The third quarter of the year continues to be a time when cash flow problems are most acute. In this quarter Centers are forced to call on their reserves to cover almost 40 percent of their annual expenditures. Annex tables A2.4a and A2.4b detail the disbursements in 2000. CGIAR Members have the option to disburse their contributions either directly to the Centers or through the Secretariat using the World Bank’s payment system. In 2000 approximately $70 million (21 percent of total contributions) was disbursed through the World Bank’s payment system. In the last few years, the number of Members using this system has more than doubled from 6 to 14, as has the amount disbursed (from $24 million in 1994 to $70 million in 2000), excluding the disbursement of the World Bank contribution. The main advantage to Members of using the Bank’s payment system is a reduction in the number of financial transactions: Members make only one transfer to the World Bank account instead of as many as 16 to various Centers’ bank accounts. Beginning in 2000, Centers enter into formal contractual agreements with the World Bank concerning the use of the funds disbursed. This is to ensure full accountability. Annex table A2.4b illustrates Member disbursements through the World Bank in 1999 and 2000. In addition to Member contributions, the Secretariat also manages the disbursement of the World Bank’s contributions. CENTER PERSPECTIVE Figure 7 illustrates the distribution of funding by Center, in 2000. In that year CIMMYT was the recipient of the largest amount of funding; followed by IRRI. Each of these Centers had funding in excess of $30 million. With $8.5 million, WARDA was the recipient of the smallest amount of agenda funding. Funding for four Centers was at or above levels approved at ICW99: CIMMYT, $4.9 million (up 15 percent); IRRI, $3.8 million (up 13 percent); CIP , $2.5 million (up 14 percent); and CIFOR, $0.2 million (up 2 percent). Funding for eight Centers was within 10 percent of, and thus broadly in line with, financing plan targets: ICARDA, $0.3 million (down 1 percent); ICRAF, $1.1 million (down 5 percent); Figure 8 Funding outcomes vs. financing plans, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 5.0 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0 -3.0 -4.0 -5.0 YT MM I C I IRR P CI I R R A F T RI FO ARD SNA ICRA IWM RISA IPG CI I IC IC RI RM IFP LA IC IITA AT RDA CI A W I ILR ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 39 Figure 9 Changes in Center funding, 1999–2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 R T AT CI CIFO MMY I C I P DA RM RAF ISAT IFPR CI AR CLA C R I C C I I I IITA I ILR RI IPG I IRR AR DA MI IW WAR ISN 1999 2000 Figure 10 Agenda funding by funding type, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Restricted Unrestricted AT IFOR MYT CI C M CI P CI DA RM RAF ISAT AR CLA IC ICR IC I RI IFP IITA I ILR RI IPG I I R A IRR SNA IWM ARD I W 40 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH ICRISAT, $1.4 million (down 6 percent); IPGRI, $1.4 million (down 6 percent); ISNAR, $0.7 million, (down 7 percent); IFPRI, $1.8 million (down 8 percent); CIAT, $3.2 million (down 10 percent); and IITA $3.1 million (down 10 percent). Funding for the four remaining Centers was 10 percent or more outside their financing plan targets: IWMI, $1.3 million (down 13 percent); ICLARM, $2.5 million (down 17 percent); ILRI, $4.9 million (down 17 percent), and WARDA, $3.7 million (down 31 percent). These shortfalls primarily reflect lower-than-expected funding from other CGIAR investors and slower-than-planned project implementation. Figure 8 compares the actual funding received by Centers with their approved funding plans, revealing excesses and shortfalls. As figure 9 shows, 11 of the Centers received greater funding in 2000 than in 1999: CIMMYT, $4.1 million (up 12 percent); ICARDA, $3.1 million (up 16 percent); IPGRI, $2.7 million (up 13 percent); IRRI, $1.3 million (up 4 percent; CIAT, $1.0 million (up 3 percent); CIFOR, $0.9 million (up 8 percent); ICRAF, $0.9 million (up 4 percent); ICRISAT, $0.7 million (up 4 percent); IFPRI, $0.7 million (up 3 percent); ISNAR, $0.6 million (up 7 percent); and CIP , $0.5 million (up 2 percent). IWMI funding remained constant at $8.8 million. Four Centers received less funding than that received in 1999: IITA, $1.3 million (down 4 percent); ICLARM, $1.9 million (down 14 percent); WARDA, $2.3 million (down 21 percent); and ILRI, $3.5 million (down 13 percent). Annex table A2.5 details 2000 funding by Center. Annex table A2.6 presents 2000 funding outcomes by Center. Annex table A2.7 shows CGIAR System grants by Center from 1996 to 2000. FUNDING MODALITIES RESTRICTED SUPPORT There are two types of restricted support. The first is restricted support by attribution, which refers to funds for a program or region. Use of these funds within a program or region is unconstrained, but Centers are required to document their allocation. France, the United Kingdom, and the EC have given restricted support by attribution. The second type of restricted support is restricted support by contract, which refers to funds that must be expended in accordance with a contract between a Member and the Center implementing the project, subproject, or activity. Funds for each line item in the budget are specified. Any reallocation of funds within the budget generally requires the prior consent of the Member. Accountability is detailed in the contract, which often requires financial audits on a periodic (annual) or end-of-project basis. Some Members’ support is restricted support by contract. In 2000, unrestricted support was 50 percent ($164 million) of total support, down from 54 percent in 1999 (see figure 10). Restricted support (by attribution and by contract) was 50 percent of total support, up from 46 percent in 1999. In absolute terms, this support was $167 million ($15 million more than in 1999). CO-SPONSOR SUPPORT Analysis of categories and types of funding provides another perspective on the challenges faced by Centers in undertaking the approved agenda (see Financing Modalities in box 2 on page 32). Depending on the degree of flexibility in its use, CGIAR funding has been traditionally divided into two broad categories: unrestricted support and restricted support, which is targeted to a specific program, project, subproject, or activity. UNRESTRICTED SUPPORT The World Bank contributed $45 million to the CGIAR research agenda in 2000. Bank support amounted to 14 percent of total CGIAR research support. In addition, the Bank funded the annual operating costs of the CGIAR Secretariat ($4.25 million) and contributed $0.75 million to TAC. The Bank’s total support, therefore, amounted to $50 million in 2000, the same as in 1999. FAO provided $0.6 million in support of TAC/SPIA and $0.2 million directly to Centers. UNDP provided $0.4 million in support of TAC/SPIA and $1.8 million directly to Centers. WORLD BANK SUPPORT Unrestricted support refers to unrestricted funds to support the Center as a whole. World Bank contributions are the best example of this type of funding because, within the research agenda, allocation of the contribution is totally unconstrained. Centers can allocate unrestricted funds to any program or cost within the research agenda on the basis of institutional needs and priorities. Following the procedure established at ICW98, the Finance Committee allocated the Bank’s 2000 contribution at a 12 percent matching rate and authorized its disbursement. The first tranche of $33.45 million representing 90 percent of the total matching allocation of $37.25 million, was disbursed to Centers in January 2000. The second tranche of $3.8 million was disbursed to Centers in June. The amount of $3.3 million was allocated to Centers for systemwide programs as follows: ICRAF ($0.6 million, ASB), IITA ($0.3 million, IPM), IPGRI ($0.6 million, SGRP), CIMMYT ($0.25 million, tropical maize station), ICARDA ($1 million, Central Asia program), IFPRI/ISNAR, ($0.3 million, indicators project), and IFPRI ($0.25 million, SPIA/TAC poverty project). In addition, other allocation to Centers in ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 41 Figure 11 Distribution of World Bank support, 2000 5 20% 4 15% 3 10% 2 5% percentage 0 0% 1 I YT CIP RDA ARM RAF ISAT IFPR AT C I C IF M M R L A C I IC IC IC CI OR IITA I LR I IP G RI I I R A IR R N A IW M R D A IS W millions of U.S. dollars the amount of $0.8 million included $0.5 million to CIP (downsizing program), and $0.25 to CIMMYT (rice/wheat facilitation unit). The Finance Committee also allocated $0.75 million to support CGIAR Committees. At the MTM the Finance Committee allocated the remaining $3 million of the 2000 contribution, together with an additional $5 million, to Centers to better enable them to cope with the 1999 EC default. The additional $5 million was funded with an advance of $3 million from the 2001 World Bank allocation and a drawdown of $2 million from CGIAR reserves. Table 3 represents the total allocation of World Bank funding in 2000. For 1998–2000, the initial allocation of World Bank matching funds was 11 percent. For 1999 the Finance Committee increased this percentage to 11.5 percent. For 2000, matching was increased to 12 percent. Figure 11 illustrates the actual distribution of total 2000 World Bank support and the percentage of total agenda Center funding that it represented in 2000. In 2000, all 16 Centers received Bank support, ranging from 11 percent to 17 percent of total agenda contributions. Annex table A2.8 presents data on Bank support for the period from 1996 to 2000. CGIAR reserves at the beginning of 2000 were $4.5 million. During the year, $2 million were used as part of the EC rescue package. 42 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Table 3 Allocation of World Bank Funding, 1999–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) World Bank Funding Matching funds 12 percent Systemwide programs Support to CGIAR strategic initiatives Other Center allocations Support to CGIAR committees/reserves 1999 34.6 4.0 1.5 3.5 1.5 2000 37.3 3.3 0.0 3.8 0.7 TOTAL 45.0 45.0 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 43 Agenda Resources pending on agenda programs in 2000 amounted to $338 million, a decrease of $9 million or 3 percent over spending in 1999 ($347 million). Four Centers (CIFOR, ICRISAT, ILRI, and IWMI) had expenditures in line with 1999. The agenda expenditures of another four Centers were higher in 2000 than in 1999. These Centers were CIMMYT ($1.6 million, up 4 percent), IFPRI ($1.1 million, up 5 percent), IPGRI ($1.1 million, up 5 percent), and ICARDA ($0.6 million, up 3 percent). Expenditures at eight Centers were lower in 2000 than in 1999. The Centers with the most significant decreases in agenda expenditures were IITA ($2.6 million, down 8 percent), IRRI ($2.5 million, down 7 per cent), ICLARM ($2.0 million, down 16 percent), ISNAR ($1.5 million, down 16 percent), WARDA ($1.5 million, down 14 percent), CIP ($1.4 million, down 7 percent), CIAT ($1.2 million, down 4 percent) and ICRAF ($1.1 million, down 5 percent). In most of the cases in which expenditures were lower it was because of the successful completion of some restricted funded projects and delays in starting new projects. S $57.9 million. Crops accounted for 71 percent of investments, livestock for 13 percent, forestry for 12 percent, and fisheries for 4 percent. Investments in efforts to protect the environment (see figure 12c) decreased in dollar terms (from $67.9 million to $60.4 million) and percentage terms (from 20 percent to 18 percent). Investments in efforts to save biodiversity (see figure 12d) decreased in dollar terms (from $36.2 million to $34.8 million) but remained the same in percentage terms at 10 percent. Investments in improvement of policies (see figure 12e) increased in dollar terms (from $46.8 million to $48 million) and percentage terms (from 13 percent to 14 percent). Investments in efforts to strengthen NARS (see figure 12f) decreased in dollar terms (from $78.6 million to $74.6 million) and percentage terms (from 23 percent to 22 percent). Distribution of these investments among training, organization and management counseling, and other programs changed little from previous years. BY REGION ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES The allocation of resources is reviewed below from the perspective of undertaking, region, and object of expenditure. Annex 3 presents expenditure data. Annex table A3.1 provides data on investments by Center from 1996 to 2000. A new classification scheme based on an overall CGIAR logical framework has been introduced in 2000. This scheme will replace the current classification by undertaking with outputs. BY UNDERTAKING Figure 12a illustrates investments in the year 2000 in the CGIAR’s five principal undertakings: increasing productivity, protecting the environment, saving biodiversity, improving policies, and strengthening NARS. Annex table A3.2 provides details for the 1996–2000 period. Investments in the five CGIAR undertakings by Center are presented in figures 12b, 12c, 12d, 12e, and 12f. Annex table A3.3 provides details. Efforts to increase productivity continued to be the major thrust of CGIAR activities (see figure 12b). Investments in these efforts totaled $120 million (36 percent of total investment), up from $117 million (34 percent of total investment) in 1999. Among productivity investments, investments in germplasm enhancement increased marginally (from $61.2 million to $61.8). Investments in production systems development and management increased from $56.1 million to Figure 13 presents the 2000 allocation of CGIAR resources by developing regions. Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa remained at 42 percent ($140 million) of total investment in 2000. Investment in Asia remained at 32 percent ($110 million). Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean decreased from 18 percent to 17 percent ($56 million), and investment in West Asia and North Africa decreased from 10 percent to 9 percent ($31 million). All Centers invested in programs for Sub-Saharan Africa in 2000. Seven Centers—IITA, ILRI, ICRAF, CIMMYT, WARDA, IFPRI, and ICRISAT—accounted for more than 75 percent of allocations to this region. The pattern was similar in Asia. A majority of the Centers invested in programs for Asia. Four Centers—IRRI, ICRISAT, CIMMYT, and CIP— accounted for the majority of allocations to this region. About half of the allocations for WANA continued to be made by ICARDA. CIAT accounted for more than one-third of the allocations made in Latin America and the Caribbean. BY OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE The trend of reduced personnel spending continued in 2000. As figure 14 indicates, personnel costs amounted to 49 percent of total 2000 costs, a decrease of only 1 percent from 1999 but a significant decrease from the mid-1990s, when personnel expenditures accounted for 55 percent of total annual costs. From 1999 to 2000, expenditures on supplies 44 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 12a Investments in CGIAR undertakings, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 120 36% 100 30% 80 24% 60 18% 40 12% 20 6% 0 Increasing productivity Protecting the environment Saving biodiversity Improving policies Strengthening NARS 0% and services increased from 38 percent to 39 percent of total expenditures. Travel and depreciation expenditures remained constant at 7 percent and 5 percent, respectively. In absolute terms, supply and service expenditures remained at $133 million, personnel expenditures decreased by $9 million (5 percent), depreciation expenditures decreased by $2 million (10 percent), and travel expenditures increased marginally by $1 million to $25 million. Annex table A3.5 provides detailed Center-level information on object expenditures. Annex table A3.6 presents data on CGIAR staffing from 1996 to 2000. COST CHANGES increase index in dollar terms can be established with data on the proportion of expenditures in various currencies and data on the annual exchange rates of currencies reported by the International Monetary Fund (IMF). In 2000, the loss of Centers’ purchasing power was 0.3 percent, compared with 0.2 percent in 1999. Annex table A3.7 presents data on the Centers’ inflation rates from 1996 to 2000. CGIAR INVESTMENTS OVER 29 YEARS The costs at Centers are affected by both inflation and fluctuations in currency values—the relationship between the exchange rates of expenditure currencies and the U.S. dollar, the CGIAR’s unit of account. An aggregate CGIAR cost To analyze CGIAR activity from the perspective of the record of expenditures (investment), the CGIAR Secretariat organized all available Center data on resource use from 1972 to 2000. Annex table A5.1 summarizes all CGIAR investments. The table shows investments in five-year periods and for 1997 to 2000 by Center, undertaking, commodity group and production sector, region, and object of expenditure. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 45 Figure 12b Center investments in increasing productivity Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 16 14 12 10 8% 8 6% 6 4% 4 2 0 2% 14% 12% 10% 0% IITA MYT M CI I IRR I ILR AT CI P CI RI AT AF RM MI DA OR RDA IFPRI NAR W IPG CIF CR ICLA A RIS CAR S I I I C I I W Figure 12c Center investments in protecting the environment Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 8 7 6 5 8% 4 6% 3 2 1 0 4% 2% 0% 14% 12% 10% YT MM I C I IRR AT CI I A F ILR ARD RA IC IC I T IITA IFOR WM RISA ARM L I C IC IC A RI RI IFP ARD IPG W P CI AR ISN 46 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 12d Center investments in saving biodiversity Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 8 7 25% 20% 6 5 4 3 2 5% 1 0 RI YT IPG IMM C AT DA CI AR IC P CI ISAT R IC I IRR R FO CI I ILR IITA A F RM RD RA IC WA ICLA I R RI IFP ISNA IWM 15% 10% 0% Figure 12e Center investments in improving policies Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 15 30% 12 25% 20% 9 15% 6 10% 3 5% 0 0% RI IFP I I I R F T IRR CRA ISA IWM IPGR IFO R I C IC IITA I ILR R P CI CIAT MYT RDA ARM NA RDA IS WA M ICA ICL I C ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 47 Figure 12f Center investments in strengthening NARS Millions of U.S. dollars and percentages of total 12 16% 14% 12% 8 10% 8% 6% 4 4% 2 2% 0% 10 6 0 YT AR MM ISN CI IITA I IRR F RI RI IFP ICRA IPG AT ISAT CI R IC I ILR I R P A CI RDA RD WM ARM IFO A A L I C IC W IC 48 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 13 CGIAR allocations by developing region, 2000 Percentage of total West Asia and North Africa 9% Latin America and the Caribbean 17% Sub-Saharan Africa 42% Asia 32% Figure 14 CGIAR expenditure by object, 2000 Percentage of total Supplies and services 39% Personnel 49% Depreciation 5% Travel 7% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 49 Financial Position he aggregation of 1996–2000 Center data, shown in table 4 and elaborated below, reflects the financial position of the CGIAR System. Annex table A4.1 provides details by Center. The 2000 financial data confirm that the CGIAR as a whole is in a strong financial condition. Total net assets at the end of 2000 were $203 million (1999: $263 million). These assets are made up of $62 million (1999: $44 million) in unappropriated net assets and $141 million (1999: $219 million) in appropriated net assets. Cash and cash-equivalent balances totaled $177 million at the end of 2000 (1999: $212 million). This figure includes $26 million in cash and investments disclosed under long-term assets. T NET ASSETS Net assets are the residual interest in an entity’s assets after liabilities have been deducted. Hence, net assets in not-forprofit organizations are equivalent to “shareholder equity” in for-profit organizations. The CGIAR introduced two changes in accounting for net assets during 1999/2000. The first accounting change, introduced in 1999, concerns accounting for land and buildings, which revert to the host government of a Center should a Center cease operations. The new policy states that land and buildings do not have a residual value and should be written out of a Center’s books of account. Centers will no longer annually depreciate such land and buildings but will instead carry them in their balance sheets at a fully written-down value of zero. As a result, Centers’ annual depreciation charges and total net assets will decrease. The new policy, which was implemented by some Centers (ICARDA, ICLARM, and ICRISAT) in 1999, was implemented by most of the remaining Centers during 2000. The net effect of the policy in 2000 was to reduce investments in fixed assets (and, by implication, in net assets) by $75 million. The second accounting change was to reclassify net assets as either unappropriated (broadly corresponding to the earlier term “operating funds”) or appropriated (broadly corresponding to the earlier term “capital invested in fixed assets plus capital funds”). This change was initiated to bring Figure 15 Net assets by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 I ILR I T IRR ISA R IC T I I R F T IITA MY CIA RA RDA IFPR IFO PGR I C A M C I IC CI I R A P CI WM LARM NA RD I IS WA IC 50 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 16 Unappropriated net assets by Center, 2000 In revenue days 150 120 90 60 30 0 -30 -60 L IC I R T M A R C IF O I W M R IS A IC IR R I I IITA PGR I IF P RI IL R I CI P IC R A T F A T R A M Y A R D IS N A C IA A R D M IC W CI Figure 17 Net fixed assets by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 20 15 10 5 0 I YT ISAT IL R M M IC R I C CI AT IR R I IC RA F IITA RDA A IC CI P AR W I MI D A IF O R G R IP IW C IF P RI AR RM IS N IC L A ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 51 Table 4 CGIAR System Financial Position, 1996–2000 (thousands of U.S. dollars) 1996 Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable: Donors Employees Others Inventories Pre-paid expenses Other current assets Total current assets Fixed assets Property, plant, and equipment Less: Accumulated depreciation Total fixed assets (net) Other assets Total assets Liabilities Current liabilities Bank indebtedness Accounts payable: Donors Employees Others In-trust accounts Accruals and provisions Total current liabilities Long-term liabilities Long-term loan Other Total long-term liabilities Total liabilities Total assets less total liabilities Net Assets Unappropriated Appropriated Total net assets 1997 1998 1999 2000 174,391 46,060 2,339 16,293 9,224 4,180 5,342 257,829 448,840 217,119 231,721 489,550 146,767 72,261 2,662 13,506 8,811 3,811 2,988 250,806 467,865 237,148 230,717 481,523 171,110 65,965 2,699 13,154 7,257 2,786 3,247 266,218 475,861 248,819 227,042 493,260 212,347 54,062 2,591 12,656 6,653 3,398 4,549 296,256 399,398 225,702 173,696 469,952 151,327 60,823 3,499 13,576 6,506 3,069 5,248 244,048 289,339 191,265 98,074 25,728 367,850 1,280 66,376 21,547 28,441 5,448 42,689 166,249 811 554 1,365 167,614 321,936 928 72,194 4,673 24,208 1,107 43,863 146,973 1,617 17,064 18,681 165,654 315,869 1,444 67,200 8,971 17,824 1,732 50,054 147,225 190 22,915 23,105 170,330 322,930 3,649 100,576 9,876 21,871 3,457 43,855 183,284 0 23,453 23,453 206,737 263,215 204 56,658 5,369 25,966 3,634 48,259 140,090 0 24,899 24,899 164,989 202,861 44,983 276,953 321,936 43,070 272,799 315,869 51,522 271,408 322,930 43,966 219,249 263,215 61,802 141,059 202,861 Note: The decrease in net assets in 2000 is primarily explained by the write-down of $75 million of fixed assets following a change in accounting policy. The decrease represents a book movement. 52 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CGIAR accounting policies fully into compliance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for not-for-profit organizations. More details can be found in the CGIAR Financial Guideline Series No. 2: CGIAR Accounting Policies and Reporting Practices Manual. Following the change in accounting for land and buildings, aggregate net assets fell by $60.3 million—from $263.2 million in 1999 to $202.9 million in 2000. The level of these assets for each Center is shown in figure 15. Unappropriated net assets increased by $17.8 million in 2000, from $44 million in 1999 to $61.8 million. Appropriated net assets fell by $78.1 million in 2000, from $219.2 million to $141.1 million. UNAPPROPRIATED NET ASSETS In 2000 CIAT, CIFOR, CIP , IFPRI, IWMI, IITA, IRRI, IPGRI, ISNAR and WARDA introduced the new accounting policy for depreciation on land and buildings. The net result was a reduction ($75.2 million) in the net fixed assets of CIAT (down $7.8 million); CIFOR (no change); CIP (down $6.9 million); IFPRI (no change); IWMI (no change); IITA (down $22.7 million); IRRI (down $26.4 million); IPGRI (no change); ISNAR (no change); and WARDA (down $11.4 million). CAPITAL PURCHASE FUND Unappropriated net assets (formerly “the operating fund”) are equivalent to “retained earnings” in a business enterprise. In a not-for-profit context, unappropriated net assets indicate the financial capacity of an organization to adjust to unplanned changes in revenue. At the System level, unappropriated net assets rose by $17.8 million, from $44 million in 1999 to $61.8 million in 2000. When expressed as revenue and revenue days, this increase represents an increase from 46 days in 1999 to 67 days in 2000. This increase is due to two factors. First, the aggregate statement of activity for the System as a whole resulted in an operating surplus of $12 million for 2000; included in this surplus is a net transfer of $2 million from system reserves and an advance of $3 million of 2001 income for EC relief; second, some Centers reclassified $5 million from the former capital fund as unappropriated. As figure 16 indicates, the majority of Centers continued to have unappropriated net asset days above the CGIAR’s average of 67 days. Only one Center, WARDA, had a negative balance at the end of 2000 due to accumulated deficits from earlier years. APPROPRIATED NET ASSETS The remaining $43 million set aside for fixed asset acquisition (formerly called the “capital fund”), is slightly less than the amount set aside in 1999: $45 million. The decrease is largely accounted for by the redesignation of $5 million from the capital fund as unappropriated net assets, offset by the excess of the annual depreciation charge for the System as a whole over capital purchases. This part of the fund is established primarily by the setting aside of funds equal to the value of the depreciation charge (so-called funding depreciation). Figure 18 shows the appropriated net assets funds set aside for capital purchase, by Center. With the exception of WARDA and CIMMYT, all Centers had balances at the end of 2000. The CGIAR Secretariat and Center financial staff continue to monitor the acquisition rate of assets, including any longterm major infrastructure investments, and the availability of resources. If it becomes apparent that the useful life of fixed assets is longer than previously thought, assumed asset lives conceivably could be increased sufficiently to reduce depreciation costs, with no ill effects on Center operations. LIQUIDITY Appropriated net assets fell by $78 million, from $219 million in 1999 to $141 million in 2000. They comprised $98 million invested in fixed assets and $43 million set aside by Centers for the acquisition of fixed assets. The capital invested in fixed assets decreased by $76 million, from $174 million in 1999 to $98 million in 2000, largely because of the write-down of $75 million of assets following the above-noted change in accounting for fixed assets. NET FIXED ASSETS The CGIAR’s asset base indicates a stable pattern of capital acquisition. In 2000, capital expenditures totaled $15 million; the annual depreciation charge totaled $16 million. Annex table A4.2 indicates capital expenditures by Center for the period 1996–2000. Figure 17 illustrates the 2000 year-end levels of net fixed assets for all Centers. Liquidity represents an organization’s ability to meet its short-term spending requirements. Two primary indicators of liquidity are “current ratio” and “working capital.” Current ratio is current assets divided by current liabilities, represented as a fraction. This liquidity measure is comparable across organizations, regardless of size, because it is a relative figure. Working capital is the amount by which current assets exceed current liabilities. Because of the different sizes of Centers, absolute numbers are not helpful for comparative purposes. Working capital expressed in terms of future spending requirements is useful for such purposes. The Centers’ liquidity hinges on Members’ disbursements, which span the entire calendar year. With few exceptions, Members’ progress in making disbursements in the earlier months of the year has not been encouraging. At the end of 2000, 18 percent of the value of 2000 agenda contributions (nearly two months of income) was outstanding as accounts receivable from Members. Figure 19 presents these accounts as a percentage of grants. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 53 Figure 18 Capital purchase fund by Center, 2000 Millions of U.S. dollars 10 8 6 4 2 0 IR R I IITA I I I I R F A T T IL R IS A R D IF P R P G R W M R A A R M IF O C IA I I C CL R IC A I C C I I CI P IS N A R M YT RD A M WA CI Figure 19 Member receivables by Center, 2000 As a percentage of grants 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 R YT DA MI AF R M IF O A R IM M IC R IW C L A C C I I C IITA IL R I CI AT IP G RI CI P IF P R A RI SAT I N A A RD R S I IC W IR R I 54 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Figure 20 CGIAR System current ratio, 1996–2000 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Figure 21 Working capital by Center, 1999–2000 In days 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 1999 -50 2000 R F YT AT I T DA RM CIA CIFOCIMM CIP ICAR ICLA ICRA ICRIS IFPR IITA ILRI RI IPG I R A IRRI ISNA IWM ARD W ANNUAL REPORT 2000 FINANCIAL REPORT 55 CURRENT RATIO The systemwide current ratio in the CGIAR increased marginally, from 1.64 in 1999 to 1.74 in 2000. The CGIAR’s average current ratio is within the normative range. As a general rule of thumb, a current ratio of 1.5 is considered adequate. Five Centers have current ratios of less than 1.5: ICRAF (1.3), IFPRI (1.3), IRRI (1.4), ISNAR (1.4), and WARDA (0.8). If IRRI’s investments were considered to be part of current assets, as they were in the past, its current ratio would be 2.0. Figure 20 shows the evolution of the current ratio since 1996. WORKING CAPITAL Figure 21 compares working capital expressed as Center spending requirements in days in 1999 and 2000. The 2000 system average of 112 days of expenditure is less than the 1999 system average: 119 days. In all but one Center, the number of working days in 2000 was generally in line with that in 1999. IRRI’s average days decreased from 253 days to 130 days, primarily because of a long-term investment of $12.5 million, which is no longer considered part of working capital. Because of their low level of working capital, ISNAR and WARDA (–50 days) are in need of continued careful cash management. 56 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH Compliance with Financial Guidelines The Centers are independent institutions governed by their respective boards of trustees. In the interest of transparency and consistency in financial practices and the presentation of financial information, the Centers follow financial guidelines issued by the CGIAR Secretariat. These guidelines aim to bring the CGIAR’s financial practices into conformity with those generally accepted worldwide. Developed with the input of Center financial personnel, external financial experts, and Secretariat staff, the guidelines are amended as required to reflect changing practices. Guidelines covering accounting policies and the preparation of externally audited annual financial statements are particularly relevant in this regard. The most recent revision of these guidelines took effect in 1999 and brought CGIAR practices up to date with the current practices of not-for-profit organizations. As part of the annual review of substantive financial performance, Pricewaterhouse Coopers (PwC) has reviewed the externally audited 2000 Center financial statements to ensure compliance with CGIAR policy and reporting guidelines. PwC has confirmed that all Centers comply with existing policy and reporting guidelines and that any departures have resulted in no material misstatements of financial information. 58 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A1.1 CGIAR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE APPROVED RESEARCH AGENDA BY MEMBER GROUP, 1972–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Members 1972–76 1977–81 1982–86 1.0 9.2 5.9 28.3 2.1 6.1 36.6 1.9 29.1 20.5 11.4 2.5 16.5 26.6 32.6 230.5 48.6 222.0 270.6 20.5 54.7 0.1 75.3 1.0 1.5 1987–91 5.0 14.2 14.4 59.0 21.4 18.3 54.6 1.8 39.8 0.3 30.7 20.6 2.5 28.0 46.3 55.8 412.7 71.0 217.3 288.3 16.7 104.9 121.7 0.2 1.5 1992–96 7.1 19.9 45.0 76.6 3.9 21.4 76.2 3.0 17.6 1.0 55.9 28.4 3.9 39.0 63.6 50.8 513.4 75.2 183.5 258.7 25.5 166.3 191.7 0.6 2.5 4.5 0.3 1.0 4.0 1.2 1.9 2.6 0.6 0.0 1.7 0.2 1997 1.8 5.5 19.1 23.1 2.1 4.9 16.6 0.8 4.0 0.7 14.5 7.2 0.3 1.8 7.1 20.9 10.2 140.6 12.9 38.3 51.2 6.6 33.5 40.0 0.1 0.5 0.5 2.6 0.2 1.1 0.8 0.5 1.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.5 15.8 4.9 1.0 3.5 9.4 0.6 1.4 42.6 6.5 24.9 9.5 37.0 0.3 116.1 238.9 3.4 844 6.5 4.6 6.3 11.0 1.0 5.3 1.9 48.8 3.4 1.9 1.2 38.2 0.1 162.8 264.5 1,105 20.6 12.9 0.4 7.7 21.0 4.0 5.6 5.1 25.8 4.4 4.2 0.8 38.6 1.2 222.5 312.3 6.2 1,324 10.8 3.2 0.3 2.1 5.6 1.8 1.0 1.0 0.3 4.5 2.4 3.1 0.2 4.5 0.2 45.0 63.9 8.2 320 1998 2.3 6.0 17.7 24.9 2.1 5.9 16.3 1.0 3.0 0.7 14.7 8.3 0.3 1.1 9.3 22.7 11.5 147.6 12.3 40.5 52.8 7.8 35.3 0.4 43.5 0.1 0.7 0.5 2.5 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.1 2.0 0.5 0.9 0.6 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.3 13.2 3.1 0.3 3.4 6.8 3.8 0.8 1.5 0.6 2.1 2.4 4.0 0.2 3.2 0.1 45.0 63.7 11.9 340 1999 2.3 6.8 14.0 6.0 1.5 5.9 15.5 0.9 3.2 0.7 11.6 8.9 0.5 0.9 10.3 22.8 13.9 125.8 12.3 39.4 51.7 8.1 39.9 0.4 48.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 2.7 0.1 1.4 0.7 0.4 1.8 0.4 0.8 1.7 1.6 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.1 14.7 2.6 0.1 3.5 6.2 4.4 2.3 1.9 0.2 1.5 3.0 6.9 0.2 2.1 0.2 45.0 67.7 15.0 330 2000 1.8 4.7 11.0 22.3 1.5 6.0 10.2 0.8 3.2 1.3 13.7 7.7 0.4 1.2 9.4 18.3 14.9 128.3 11.4 42.1 53.5 8.5 34.6 0.5 43.5 0.3 0.4 1.0 2.3 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.2 1.7 0.1 0.9 1.8 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.3 13.7 2.6 0.0 4.0 6.6 6.0 1.2 1.7 0.2 1.4 2.3 5.8 0.2 1.8 0.7 45.0 66.3 19.2 331 Total 21.2 83.6 133.5 257.5 34.6 72.8 278.4 10.6 101.9 4.7 177.3 105.0 1.4 14.4 141.6 232.6 226.2 1,897.3 297.2 952.8 1,250.0 110.9 497.5 1.6 610.0 0.8 3.2 8.2 14.6 0.7 6.2 12.7 2.5 13.9 1.0 6.3 8.8 15.0 0.8 0.9 6.8 0.2 5.0 2.2 0.5 1.0 0.3 111.5 57.0 4.0 54.3 115.3 22.5 17.0 15.7 1.2 170.0 34.0 61.9 14.2 154.5 4.2 750.8 1,246.0 65.9 5,296 Europe Austria Belgium 3.5 13.7 Denmark 1.7 4.7 European Commission 17.4 Finland France 1.1 3.1 Germany 13.3 39.1 Ireland 0.4 Italy 0.1 1.9 Luxembourg Netherlands 4.1 11.6 Norway 3.3 9.3 Portugal Spain 0.5 Sweden 7.2 14.8 Switzerland 1.9 9.5 United Kingdom 9.0 27.5 Subtotal 45.1 153.3 North America Canada 17.3 36.1 United States 41.6 128.1 Subtotal 58.9 164.2 Pacific Rim Australia 4.0 13.3 Japan 2.5 25.9 New Zealand 0.1 0.1 Subtotal 6.6 39.3 Developing and transition economies Bangladesh Brazil China Colombia Côte d’Ivoire Egypt, Arab Republic of India 0.5 Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of 2.0 3.0 Kenya Korea, Republic of Mexico 1.4 Nigeria 1.3 5.4 Pakistan Peru Philippines 0.7 Russian Federation Saudi Arabia 1.0 1.0 South Africa Syrian Arab Republic Thailand Uganda Subtotal 4.3 11.9 Foundations Ford Foundation 16.8 6.2 Kellogg Foundation 1.3 0.6 Rockefeller Foundation 17.1 6.7 Subtotal 35.2 13.5 International and regional organizations ADB 0.3 1.2 AFDB 0.1 Arab Fund 1.1 FAO IDB 11.2 32.2 IDRC 3.9 5.7 IFAD 11.1 OPEC Fund 2.0 UNDP 7.4 21.7 UNEP 0.9 0.5 World Bank 16.1 53.3 Subtotal 39.9 128.9 Other donors 0.8 1.1 Total 191 512 2.5 2.5 2.0 4.2 1.6 3.0 0.5 0.2 0.5 1.1 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 1 59 TABLE A1.2 CGIAR CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE APPROVED RESEARCH AGENDA BY CENTER, 1972–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Centers 1972–761 1977–811 1982–86 1987–91 1992–96 1997 1998 1999 2000 Total CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI2 IPGRI3 IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Subtotal 28.3 65.8 107.0 132.5 138.8 30.5 31.7 10.6 28.6 22.6 22.3 9.0 21.8 26.9 18.2 27.5 25.2 18.8 28.6 9.9 9.5 8.6 319.6 32.1 11.3 30.1 22.2 25.2 10.6 20.4 26.5 20.1 29.2 24.6 21.2 34.8 9.6 9.4 10.0 337.1 28.7 11.5 33.8 20.0 19.5 14.2 20.6 21.2 20.8 30.7 26.6 20.1 32.5 8.2 8.8 10.8 328.1 29.7 12.4 37.9 20.5 22.6 12.3 21.5 21.9 21.5 29.4 23.1 22.8 33.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 335.4 594.5 76.3 594.9 358.5 414.1 76.4 155.7 556.4 204.7 546.7 580.6 213.9 612.4 127.6 72.5 124.8 5,310.0 33.7 10.9 1.5 72.6 34.8 47.2 97.2 52.9 91.5 130.8 83.2 92.2 130.2 91.4 92.2 30.3 71.3 19.8 1.0 37.1 13.6 1.4 30.2 59.5 9.9 72.4 80.8 11.4 71.3 3.3 103.2 20.5 101.1 107.0 20.5 104.6 16.8 143.1 41.5 107.9 155.2 33.6 137.5 34.4 134.4 51.3 111.3 124.6 64.2 139.1 36.6 36.0 1.9 179.3 9.4 538.2 12.6 834.9 28.6 1,120.5 34.6 1,316.9 Reserves/ CGIAR Committees Total 179 538 9.1 844 (16.0) 1,105 7.0 1,324 0.8 320 2.5 340 1.5 330 (4.3) 331 0.6 5,311 1 2 3 Figures shown for 1972–80 are total expenditures (operations/capital) and may be higher or lower than the contributions for that year (due to the accounting convention followed in the 1970s). Formerly ILCA and ILRAD. Formerly IBPGR and INIBAP. 60 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.1 RANKING CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE CGIAR RESEARCH AGENDA, 1997–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1997 MEMBER AMOUNT 45.0 38.3 33.5 23.1 20.9 19.1 16.6 14.5 12.9 10.2 7.2 7.1 6.5 5.5 4.9 4.5 4.5 4.0 3.2 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 MEMBER 1998 AMOUNT 45.0 40.5 35.3 24.9 22.7 17.7 16.3 14.7 12.3 11.5 9.3 8.3 7.8 6.0 5.9 4.0 3.8 3.4 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.1 2.1 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 MEMBER 1999 AMOUNT MEMBER 2000 AMOUNT 45.0 42.1 34.6 22.3 18.3 14.9 13.7 11.4 11.0 10.2 9.4 8.5 7.7 6.0 6.0 5.8 4.7 4.0 3.2 2.6 2.3 2.3 1.8 1.8 1.8 1.7 1.7 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 19.2 331 #1 World Bank United States Japan European Commission Switzerland Denmark Germany Netherlands Canada #10 United Kingdom Norway Sweden Australia Belgium France IDB UNDP Italy Ford Foundation #20 IFAD Colombia IDRC Finland Rockefeller ADB Spain Austria Iran, Islamic Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of #30 AFDB Arab Fund Ireland India Luxembourg Korea, Republic of Brazil Indonesia Mexico China #40 Pakistan South Africa Thailand Philippines Kellogg Foundation FAO Portugal OPEC Fund UNEP Côte d’Ivoire #50 Bangladesh World Bank United States Japan European Commission Switzerland Denmark Germany Netherlands Canada United Kingdom Sweden Norway Australia Belgium France IFAD ADB Rockefeller Foundation UNDP Ford Foundation Italy Colombia IDRC Austria IDB Finland Iran, Islamic Republic of Arab Fund Egypt, Arab Republic of Spain Ireland Nigeria Korea, Republic of India AFDB Philippines Luxembourg Brazil South Africa Mexico FAO China Kenya New Zealand Peru Thailand Kellogg Foundation Portugal OPEC Fund Pakistan Indonesia Bangladesh Côte d’Ivoire UNEP World Bank 45.0 Japan 39.9 United States 39.4 Switzerland 22.8 Germany 15.5 Denmark 14.0 United Kingdom 13.9 Canada 12.3 Netherlands 11.6 Sweden 10.3 Norway 8.9 Australia 8.1 IFAD 6.9 Belgium 6.8 European Commission 6.0 France 5.9 ADB 4.4 Rockefeller Foundation 3.5 Italy 3.2 IDRC 3.0 Colombia 2.7 Ford Foundation 2.6 AFDB 2.3 Austria 2.3 UNDP 2.1 Arab Fund 1.9 Iran, Islamic Republic of 1.8 Mexico 1.7 Nigeria 1.6 Finland 1.5 IDB 1.5 Egypt, Arab Republic of 1.4 Spain 0.9 Ireland 0.9 Korea, Republic of 0.8 Luxembourg 0.7 India 0.7 China 0.7 New Zealand 0.5 South Africa 0.5 Syria 0.5 Portugal 0.5 Indonesia 0.4 Kenya 0.4 Brazil 0.4 Philippines 0.3 Bangladesh 0.3 Peru 0.3 FAO 0.2 UNEP 0.2 OPEC Fund 0.2 Côte d’Ivoire 0.1 Thailand 0.1 Kellogg Foundation 0.1 Pakistan 0.0 Other donors 15.0 330 World Bank United States Japan European Commission Switzerland United Kingdom Netherlands Canada Denmark Germany Sweden Australia Norway France ADB IFAD Belgium Rockefeller Foundation Italy Ford Foundation Colombia IDRC UNDP Austria Mexico Iran, Islamic Republic of Arab Fund Finland IDB Egypt, Arab Republic of Luxembourg Spain AFDB Nigeria China Korea, Republic of India Ireland UNEP South Africa New Zealand Brazil Portugal Philippines Bangladesh Uganda FAO Indonesia Peru OPEC Fund Pakistan Kenya Thailand Côte d’Ivoire Kellogg Foundation Other donors Other donors Total 8.2 320 Other donors 11.9 340 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 61 TABLE A2.2 CGIAR FUNDING BY MEMBER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) MEMBERS Europe Austria Belgium Denmark European Commission Finland France Germany Ireland Italy Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland United Kingdom SUBTOTAL North America Canada United States SUBTOTAL Pacific Rim Australia Japan New Zealand SUBTOTAL Developing countries Bangladesh Brazil China Colombia Côte d’Ivoire Egypt, Arab Republic of India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Kenya Korea, Republic of Mexico Nigeria Pakistan Peru Philippines South Africa Thailand Uganda SUBTOTAL TOTAL MEMBER COUNTRIES Foundations Ford Foundation Kellogg Foundation Rockefeller Foundation FOUNDATION TOTAL International and regional organizations ADB AFDB Arab Fund FAO IDB IDRC IFAD OPEC Fund UNDP UNEP World Bank ORGANIZATIONS TOTAL OTHER DONORS GRAND TOTAL UNRESTRICTED 1.3 1.3 6.9 1.3 1.1 2.5 0.4 1.7 0.2 8.8 6.0 0.2 0.4 5.8 5.9 43.8 8.0 26.6 34.6 3.6 32.6 36.2 RESTRICTED 0.5 3.4 4.1 22.3 0.2 4.9 7.7 0.4 1.4 1.1 4.9 1.7 0.2 0.8 3.6 12.4 14.9 84.5 3.4 15.5 18.9 4.9 2.0 0.5 7.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 2.3 0.9 0.2 1.5 0.1 0.5 1.7 0.2 0.2 0.6 0.1 4.4 119.1 0.3 9.3 119.9 2.6 0.0 4.0 6.6 6.0 1.2 1.7 0.2 1.4 2.3 5.8 0.2 1.8 0.7 45.0 45.0 164 21.3 19.2 167 T O TA L 1.8 4.7 11.0 22.3 1.5 6.0 10.2 0.8 3.2 1.3 13.7 7.7 0.4 1.2 9.4 18.3 14.9 128.3 11.4 42.1 53.5 8.5 34.6 0.5 43.5 0.3 0.4 1.0 2.3 0.1 1.4 0.8 0.2 1.7 0.1 0.9 1.8 1.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.3 13.7 239.0 2.6 0.0 4.0 6.6 6.0 1.2 1.7 0.2 1.4 2.3 5.8 0.2 1.8 0.7 45.0 66.3 19.2 331 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.1 1.0 0.0 0.4 62 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.3a SUPPORT TO THE AGREED RESEARCH AGENDA BY MEMBER BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Unrestricted support Members Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada China Côte d’Ivoire Denmark Egypt, Arab Republic of Finland France Germany India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Ireland Italy Japan Korea, Republic of Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands Nigeria Norway Peru Philippines Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland Thailand United States World Bank1 Advance 2001 /draw on reserves Total unrestricted 0.1 0.3 0.9 0.0 2.3 3.8 0.6 13.5 0.6 1.4 0.3 6.9 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 4.3 4.2 0.4 14.4 1.1 2.7 0.6 10.9 1.5 3.7 0.5 9.8 0.7 2.0 0.3 7.0 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.6 3.0 0.1 8.1 0.5 0.9 0.0 2.2 2.8 0.6 12.4 1.7 3.1 0.1 9.4 15.9 3.3 3.8 3.0 3.1 0.1 12.8 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.7 0.9 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.0 0.6 3.3 0.4 12.0 0.4 0.2 0.0 3.5 3.4 0.5 18.8 0.5 1.5 0.3 5.6 0.8 1.4 0.2 5.3 5.6 0.8 0.3 1.3 0.8 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.8 0.3 0.1 1.0 0.1 0.8 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 0.6 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 1.3 0.2 0.9 0.5 0.7 3.3 1.3 2.3 0.1 0.0 1.5 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 0.9 0.9 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 2.8 0.1 0.3 0.1 1.4 0.2 3.8 0.1 0.2 1.3 0.9 1.9 0.1 7.5 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.8 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.4 0.8 0.3 0.1 CIAT 0.2 CIFOR CIMMYT 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.7 0.1 CIP 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.2 0.1 IFPRI 0.2 0.2 0.1 IITA ILRI 0.2 0.2 0.2 IPGRI 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 IRRI 0.6 ISNAR 0.1 IWMI 0.2 WARDA UNALLOC. TOTAL 3.6 1.3 1.3 0.1 8.0 0.7 0.1 6.9 0.5 1.3 1.1 2.5 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.7 32.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 8.8 1.0 6.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 5.8 5.9 0.1 26.6 45.0 5.0 169.1 1 Total World Bank contribution was $45 million, of which $44.25 million was allocated to Centers and $0.75 million for Committees and reserves. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 63 TABLE A2.3b MEMBER SUPPORT TO THE APPROVED RESEARCH AGENDA BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Restricted contributions Members ADB AFDB Arab Fund Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Brazil Canada China Colombia Denmark European Commission Egypt, Arab Republic of FAO Finland Ford Foundation France Germany IDB IDRC IFAD India Iran, Islamic Republic of Ireland Italy Japan Kellogg Foundation Kenya Korea, Republic of Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway OPEC Fund Pakistan Peru Portugal Rockefeller Foundation South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Uganda UNDP UNEP United Kingdom United States Total restricted Non-Members Grand total (Unrestricted and restricted contributions) CIAT 0.4 CIFOR 0.2 0.1 0.1 CIMMYT 0.4 CIP 0.1 ICARDA 0.3 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 2.1 0.1 2.8 0.0 0.4 0.7 0.7 0.4 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.2 0.1 3.0 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.9 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.9 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 1.3 0.9 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 1.8 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 14.3 2.0 29.7 0.8 0.2 4.6 0.8 12.4 1.4 0.8 18.3 5.2 37.9 0.7 1.3 9.3 0.3 20.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.1 11.6 1.2 22.6 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.2 5.0 0.3 12.3 0.3 0.2 1.7 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.8 0.3 0.4 1.6 9.9 2.2 21.5 0.7 5.2 11.9 1.5 29.4 1.8 0.5 10.0 0.3 23.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.7 1.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.8 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 2.7 0.8 8.8 0.3 0.4 2.1 0.8 8.5 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.1 ICLARM 0.5 ICRAF ICRISAT 0.3 0.4 0.2 0.2 IFPRI 0.9 IITA ILRI 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 1.1 0.0 0.1 1.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 IPGRI 0.4 0.1 0.0 IRRI 1.1 ISNAR 0.1 0.1 0.0 IWMI 0.5 0.1 0.1 WARDA UNALLOC. TOTAL 6.0 1.2 1.7 4.9 0.5 0.3 3.4 0.3 3.4 0.3 2.3 4.1 22.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 2.6 4.9 7.7 1.4 2.3 5.8 0.2 1.5 0.4 1.4 2.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.1 1.7 4.9 0.5 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.6 0.8 3.6 12.4 0.3 1.8 0.7 14.9 15.5 147.9 19.2 336.2 0.3 0.3 1.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.4 0.1 2.2 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.5 2.3 0.0 1.7 0.0 1.4 1.3 0.5 0.1 1.5 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 1.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.9 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 1.6 0.4 0.0 0.1 1.7 1.5 8.8 0.7 21.9 0.5 0.4 0.0 0.8 1.0 12.8 0.6 21.5 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 1.0 0.1 9.3 1.5 22.8 2.5 0.6 0.1 2.6 0.7 14.9 0.2 33.8 0.3 0.0 2.5 0.8 8.8 0.8 64 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.4a MONTHLY DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDING BY MEMBER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Jan. Unrestricted support Members Australia Austria Belgium Brazil Canada China Côte d’Ivoire Denmark Egypt, Arab Republic of Finland France Germany India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Ireland Italy Japan Korea, Republic of Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands Nigeria Norway Peru Philippines Portugal Spain Sweden Switzerland Thailand United States World Bank Reserves/advance Subtotal Restricted support Members ADB AFDB Arab Fund Australia Austria Bangladesh Belgium Brazil Canada China Colombia Denmark European Commission Egypt, Arab Republic of FAO Finland Ford Foundation France Germany IDB IDRC IFAD India Iran, Islamic Republic of Ireland Italy Japan Kenya Korea, Republic of Luxembourg Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway OPEC Fund Pakistan Peru Portugal Rockefeller Foundation South Africa Spain Sweden Switzerland Uganda UNDP UNEP United Kingdom United States Non-Members Subtotal Total monthly amount Total monthly percent Cumulative amount Cumulative percent 3.6 Feb. Mar. April 1.3 May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Receivable TOTAL 3.6 1.3 1.3 0.1 8.0 0.7 0.1 6.9 0.5 1.3 1.1 2.5 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.7 32.6 0.5 0.2 0.1 8.8 1.0 6.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 5.8 5.9 0.1 26.6 45.0 5.0 169.1 1.3 0.0 8.0 0.7 0.1 0.5 0.5 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.2 1.1 0.3 6.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.7 0.1 32.6 0.4 0.2 0.7 3.5 0.3 0.1 0.9 0.7 6.0 0.0 0.4 2.4 0.3 1.0 0.1 0.2 1.9 5.9 0.4 0.4 0.2 2.1 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.1 20.0 35.2 47.4 0.4 3.7 2.6 1.9 6.8 16.1 3.0 5.0 12.7 6.7 9.1 11.0 0.6 20.0 41.2 2.4 0.2 0.8 1.4 0.8 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.6 1.2 0.9 1.6 1.5 2.2 0.3 3.4 1.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.5 0.3 2.3 2.9 22.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 2.6 0.0 0.1 0.7 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.7 4.2 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.4 1.8 1.3 2.2 2.1 0.2 1.4 3.4 3.6 2.0 0.1 0.5 1.1 0.1 1.7 0.0 0.2 1.7 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 3.0 11.3 0.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 12.5 59.9 18% 59.9 18% 0.1 0.7 1.3 1.7 1% 61.6 18% 1.2 4.8 1% 66.4 20% 0.2 3.0 5.6 2% 72.0 21% 2.3 0.2 2.1 8.2 10.1 3% 82.1 24% 0.1 0.1 1.3 9.4 25.5 8% 107.6 32% 0.8 1.4 3.8 16.5 5% 124.1 37% 0.3 0.9 2.8 12.0 4% 136.1 40% 2.3 0.2 10.4 21.4 6% 157.5 47% 2.8 2.5 7.9 8.6 3% 166.0 49% 1.8 0.6 3.5 7.0 5.4 47.8 89.0 26% 275.6 82% 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.1 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 1.5 0.6 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.5 0.3 3.1 0.7 20.7 6% 186.7 56% 2.8 7.5 5.2 58.0 60.5 18% 336.1 100% 6.0 1.2 1.7 4.9 0.5 0.3 3.4 0.3 3.4 0.3 2.3 4.0 22.3 0.9 0.2 0.2 2.6 4.9 7.7 1.4 2.3 5.8 0.2 1.5 0.4 1.4 2.0 0.1 0.5 1.1 1.7 4.9 0.5 1.7 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 4.0 0.6 0.8 3.6 12.3 0.3 1.8 0.7 14.9 15.5 19.2 167.0 336.0 100% 336.0 100% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 65 TABLE A2.4b MEMBER CONTRIBUTIONS DISBURSED THROUGH THE WORLD BANK, 1999–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1999 Disbursement 2000 Disbursement Members National currency in U.S. dollars Month National currency in U.S. dollars Month Austria Canada1 China European Commission Finland France2 Italy Mexico Norway Peru Portugal South Africa Spain Thailand United States3 NOK 57.0 FIM FF 8.0 14.3 CAD 8.0 1.5 12.6 0.7 May July December EUR 14.9 CAD 12.6 1.5 8.5 0.7 13.5 1.3 1.8 2.1 0.1 NOK 57.0 6.6 April May/August January 2001 January 2001 December September September May June 1.7 2.1 2.5 0.1 7.3 0.1 0.5 0.5 1.1 0.1 4.9 May FIM 8.0 14.4 February 2000 FF October April August September July December April December November 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.1 32.5 March 2001 December May February 2001 July/Dec Total 35.7 70.4 1 Includes allocation to a non-CGIAR center (IBSRAM), and Linkage Fund contributions(CAD 450,000). 2 Includes allocations to three non-CGIAR centers (AVRDC, IBSRAM, and ICRA). 3 Includes grants for strengthening African networks($4,759), and for integrating agricultural and environmental research ($1,139). 66 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.5 CGIAR FUNDING BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Unrestricted support Restricted support Member total Percent of targeted support CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 13.5 6.9 14.4 10.9 9.8 7.0 8.1 12.4 9.4 15.9 12.8 12.0 18.8 5.6 5.3 5.6 16.2 5.5 23.5 9.6 12.8 5.3 13.4 9.5 12.1 13.5 10.3 10.8 15.0 3.2 3.5 2.9 29.7 12.4 37.9 20.5 22.6 12.3 21.5 21.9 21.5 29.4 23.1 22.8 33.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 55% 44% 62% 47% 57% 43% 62% 43% 56% 46% 45% 47% 44% 37% 40% 34% Center total 168.4 167.1 335.4 50% Reserves/CGIAR Committees (4.3) (4.3) Total grants 164 167 331 50% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 67 TABLE A2.6 FUNDING OUTCOMES BY CENTER, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 2000 Requirements 2000 financing Unrestricted support 1 Restricted support 2 World Bank contributions Total funding Funding in relation to financing plan 2000 funding in relation to 1999 funding CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Subtotal 32.9 12.2 33.1 17.9 22.9 14.7 22.6 23.3 23.2 32.5 28.0 24.2 30.1 9.5 10.1 12.2 349.4 9.1 5.3 9.8 7.6 5.6 4.7 5.0 9.2 6.1 12.2 9.6 8.3 14.8 3.8 3.7 4.8 119.6 16.2 5.5 23.5 9.6 12.8 5.3 13.4 9.4 12.1 13.5 10.3 10.7 15.0 3.2 3.5 2.4 166.5 4.4 1.7 4.6 3.3 4.1 2.3 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.8 3.2 3.8 3.9 1.8 1.6 1.3 49.3 29.7 12.4 37.9 20.5 22.6 12.3 21.5 21.9 21.4 29.4 23.1 22.8 33.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 335.4 90% 102% 115% 115% 99% 84% 95% 94% 92% 90% 83% 94% 112% 93% 87% 70% 96% 103% 108% 112% 103% 116% 87% 104% 103% 103% 96% 87% 113% 104% 107% 100% 79% 102% Reserves/CGIAR Committees (4.3) (4.3) Total 349 121 167 45 331 1 2 Unrestricted support in the form of unrestricted contributions. Support targeted at programs or specific projects. 68 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A2.7 CGIAR SYSTEM GRANTS BY CENTER, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Grants supporting the agreed research agenda CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Total grants Other net flows Reserves/advance CGIAR Committees Total support to the agreed research agenda (5.0) 0.8 31.0 8.7 27.4 22.7 21.1 9.6 17.4 27.4 16.0 22.4 24.8 16.4 28.7 10.7 9.0 8.7 301.9 31.7 10.6 28.6 22.6 22.3 9.0 21.8 26.9 18.2 27.5 25.2 18.8 28.6 9.9 9.5 8.6 319.6 32.1 11.3 30.1 22.2 25.2 10.6 20.4 26.5 20.1 29.2 24.6 21.2 34.8 9.6 9.4 10.0 337.1 28.7 11.5 33.8 20.0 19.5 14.2 20.6 21.2 20.8 30.7 26.6 20.1 32.5 8.2 8.8 10.8 328.1 29.7 12.4 37.9 20.5 22.6 12.3 21.5 21.9 21.5 29.4 23.1 22.8 33.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 335.4 2.3 0.8 2.5 1.5 304.2 320.4 339.6 329.6 331.2 Non-agenda funding Total support to non-agenda Total funding 28.4 333 13.1 334 0.0 340 0.0 330 0.0 331 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 2 69 TABLE A2.8 WORLD BANK FUNDING BY CENTER, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentage terms) Amount in millions of U.S. dollars 1996 CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Center total 4.9 0.6 4.4 1.6 3.3 1.5 1.5 5.2 1.3 3.8 6.3 1.6 4.8 1.5 1.5 0.6 44.4 1997 4.6 0.9 3.7 1.8 2.9 1.3 1.9 6.7 1.6 3.8 5.2 2.0 4.5 1.3 1.2 0.9 44.2 0.3 1998 3.1 1.2 3.3 2.3 5.4 1.1 2.1 5.7 2.0 3.0 4.7 2.1 3.1 1.5 1.0 1.1 42.5 1.0 1.5 1999 3.4 1.4 3.8 2.9 2.1 4.1 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.7 3.9 2.9 3.7 1.0 2.3 2.2 43.5 1.0 2000 4.4 1.7 4.6 3.3 4.1 2.3 3.1 3.4 3.2 3.8 3.2 3.8 3.9 1.8 1.6 1.3 49.3 0.8 Percent of total agenda funding 1996 18% 8% 17% 8% 18% 20% 9% 20% 13% 17% 26% 13% 18% 23% 21% 7% 16% 1997 15% 10% 14% 8% 14% 13% 11% 24% 10% 17% 21% 12% 16% 12% 13% 10% 15% 1998 10% 11% 12% 10% 24% 12% 10% 21% 11% 11% 18% 11% 11% 15% 10% 13% 13% 1999 11% 12% 12% 13% 9% 38% 12% 9% 12% 9% 16% 14% 11% 10% 24% 20% 13% 2000 15% 14% 12% 16% 18% 19% 14% 16% 15% 13% 14% 17% 12% 20% 18% 15% 15% CGIAR Committees and System review Reserve Advance 2001 Total 44.9 0.5 0.5 0.5 (2.0) (3.0) 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 70 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.1 CGIAR INVESTMENTS BY CENTER, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Agreed agenda 36.8 9.4 28.7 24.6 23.2 8.6 17.4 28.8 16.2 28.4 25.9 16.5 30.4 11.2 9.2 9.8 325.0 33.3 10.6 30.4 24.7 27.6 8.6 22.2 26.7 18.1 28.5 26.7 18.6 28.2 10.4 9.6 9.2 333.3 33.5 11.1 32.2 21.7 23.6 10.4 21.1 21.8 18.6 29.4 27.7 21.7 35.0 9.9 9.2 9.9 336.8 30.7 12.7 37.4 21.6 22.8 12.4 21.8 23.2 20.1 32.7 26.5 20.4 35.1 9.7 8.8 10.9 346.8 29.5 12.6 39.0 20.2 23.4 10.4 20.7 23.3 21.2 30.1 26.5 21.5 32.6 8.2 8.9 9.4 337.5 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 71 TABLE A3.2 CGIAR RESEARCH AGENDA INVESTMENTS BY ACTIVITY, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentages) 1996 $ Increasing productivity of which: Germplasm enhancement and breeding Production systems development and management Cropping systems Livestock systems Tree systems Fish systems Protecting the environment Saving biodiversity Improving policies Strengthening NARS Training Documentation/publication/information Institution building/advice to NARS Institution building networks TOTAL 70.2 40.5 18.4 9.2 2.2 53.7 34.6 38.9 68.7 24.6 18.3 12.2 13.7 22% 12% 6% 3% 1% 17% 11% 12% 21% 8% 6% 4% 4% 58.8 18% 129.1 % 40% $ 1997 % 40% $ 1998 % 37% $ 1999 % 34% $ 2000 % 36% 133.1 124.3 117.3 119.7 63.7 19% 60.0 18% 61.2 18% 61.8 18% 69.4 35.1 18.7 14.2 1.4 57.4 35.3 37.3 70.2 25.1 19.9 11.5 13.7 21% 11% 6% 4% 0.4% 17% 11% 11% 21% 8% 6% 3% 4% 64.3 32.7 19.7 10.4 1.5 64.5 37.2 39.9 70.9 27.0 20.1 10.5 13.3 19% 10% 6% 3% 0.4% 19% 11% 12% 21% 8% 6% 3% 4% 56.1 29.3 15.6 9.3 1.9 67.9 36.2 46.8 78.6 29.8 20.7 12.7 15.4 16% 8% 4% 3% 0.5% 20% 10% 13% 23% 9% 6% 4% 4% 57.9 32.1 13.8 8.3 3.7 60.4 34.8 48.0 74.6 29.8 19.9 10.2 14.7 18% 10% 4% 3% 1% 18% 10% 14% 22% 9% 6% 3% 4% 325.0 100% 333.3 100% 336.8 100% 346.8 100% 337.5 100% 72 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.3 CENTERS’ RESEARCH AGENDA INVESTMENTS BY ACTIVITY, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) Increasing Productivity Enhance and breed Production Systems Dev & Mgmt Crops Livestock Trees Enhance Fish Protecting Saving the environment biodiversity Improving policies Strengthening NARS Training Info Org/Mgmt Networks Total Member funding Funding Source Center income Reserves CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 7.8 3.2 1.3 3.1 6.7 3.8 7.4 4.3 1.6 5.5 3.1 1.5 2.8 1.5 1.9 1.5 1.4 3.5 3.5 13.0 1.4 0.2 5.4 1.3 1.1 1.5 0.5 1.6 29.5 12.6 29.7 12.4 37.9 20.5 22.6 12.3 21.5 21.9 21.5 29.4 23.1 22.8 33.8 8.8 8.8 8.5 1.0 0.4 1.3 0.6 1.1 0.5 0.8 1.7 0.9 0.9 1.8 0.6 1.6 0.3 0.4 0.3 (0.6) (1.6) 11.3 6.8 4.1 1.0 1.0 6.2 3.2 5.2 3.8 1.7 3.7 5.0 3.6 0.2 0.1 1.8 1.5 3.2 39.0 20.2 23.4 10.4 20.7 5.1 2.6 4.7 3.2 2.2 4.0 0.1 0.8 2.3 0.7 0.6 4.2 2.3 3.1 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.6 2.3 1.1 1.1 0.7 0.5 1.0 0.8 3.0 1.4 1.3 2.0 3.3 1.4 1.5 0.3 0.5 0.6 1.0 23.3 21.2 7.8 1.9 2.7 9.7 7.2 10.6 0.9 3.6 0.1 4.4 6.0 1.7 7.2 1.1 1.4 7.9 2.2 2.7 2.6 2.9 3.8 1.2 2.0 1.9 1.1 30.1 26.5 21.5 32.6 8.2 8.8 9.4 0.2 1.5 0.2 3.2 0.1 1.1 3.6 1.5 1.4 2.0 0.5 3.1 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.7 Total Undertaking investments: 61.8 32.1 13.8 8.3 3.7 60.4 34.8 48.0 29.8 19.9 10.2 14.7 337.5 335.4 13.9 (2.2) 119.7 60.4 34.8 48.0 74.6 337.5 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 73 TABLE A3.4 REGIONAL ALLOCATIONS, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentages) EXPENDITURE Sub-Saharan Africa Asia Latin America and the Caribbean West Asia and North Africa % $ % $ % $ % $ CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 29.5 12.6 39.0 20.2 23.4 10.4 20.7 23.3 21.2 30.1 26.5 21.5 32.6 8.2 8.9 9.4 23% 29% 37% 18% 15% 30% 76% 50% 50% 96% 67% 28% 4% 38% 7% 100% 6.8 3.7 14.5 3.6 3.5 3.2 15.7 11.6 10.6 28.8 17.8 6.0 1.3 3.1 0.7 9.4 12% 37% 28% 51% 12% 58% 18% 48% 26% 2% 21% 27% 92% 27% 81% 3.5 4.6 10.9 10.3 2.7 6.0 3.6 11.3 5.5 0.7 5.6 5.8 30.0 2.2 7.2 63% 34% 25% 26% 3% 4% 7% 1% 18% 2% 10% 23% 3% 29% 5% 18.5 4.2 9.7 5.2 0.7 0.4 1.4 0.2 3.7 0.7 2.6 5.0 1.0 2.4 0.4 2% 0.7 10% 5% 71% 8% 3.9 1.1 16.5 0.8 1% 7% 0.2 1.4 2% 22% 1% 6% 7% 0.5 4.8 0.3 0.5 0.6 Total 338 42% 140 32% 110 17% 56 9% 31 74 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.5 CGIAR OBJECT EXPENDITURES, 2000 (millions of U.S. dollars and percentages) Personnel Supplies/ services 10.7 5.5 15.2 9.7 10.8 4.9 6.4 7.7 9.3 12.2 9.6 10.1 12.8 2.6 1.9 3.6 133 Travel Depreciation Total CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Total 15.5 5.8 20.1 8.8 9.0 4.6 11.1 12.5 10.0 13.9 13.3 9.5 14.9 4.6 5.5 4.3 164 2.2 0.7 2.2 1.2 2.5 0.9 2.2 1.7 1.5 1.7 1.6 1.5 2.7 0.8 1.0 0.5 25 1.2 0.6 1.4 0.5 1.2 0.0 1.0 1.4 0.3 2.4 2.0 0.4 2.2 0.2 0.5 1.0 16 29.5 12.6 39.0 20.2 23.4 10.4 20.7 23.3 21.2 30.1 26.5 21.5 32.6 8.2 8.9 9.4 338 Personnel Supplies/ services CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA Total 52% 46% 52% 44% 38% 44% 54% 54% 47% 46% 50% 44% 46% 56% 62% 46% 49% 36% 44% 39% 48% 46% 48% 31% 33% 44% 41% 36% 47% 39% 32% 22% 38% 39% 7% 5% 6% 6% 11% 8% 11% 7% 7% 6% 6% 7% 8% 10% 11% 5% 7% Travel Depreciation Total 4% 4% 4% 2% 5% 0% 5% 6% 1% 8% 8% 2% 7% 2% 6% 11% 5% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 75 TABLE A3.6 CGIAR STAFFING, 1996–2000 1996 International staff 1997 Other International staff staff 1998 Other International staff staff 1999 Other International staff staff Other staff 2000 International staff Other staff CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 76 32 73 63 85 20 53 84 41 86 79 41 64 38 22 21 650 78 669 576 395 207 355 1,787 82 1,659 800 86 1,374 53 305 340 60 31 81 64 76 27 50 62 45 86 61 41 82 53 22 21 678 86 775 527 405 183 286 1,289 94 1,499 806 121 836 35 356 319 64 31 88 62 83 28 56 55 43 82 80 43 90 49 21 17 639 83 726 480 333 263 313 1,041 89 1,268 777 112 835 38 243 338 62 30 86 64 92 30 52 59 44 79 76 46 82 45 25 35 610 86 746 607 330 291 305 1,155 83 1,090 725 112 960 40 226 335 58 37 86 58 94 24 47 54 52 83 67 46 79 32 26 30 638 118 795 529 330 225 258 1,120 90 1,043 746 143 997 35 211 364 Total 877 9,416 862 8,295 892 7,578 907 7,701 873 7,642 76 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A3.7 CENTERS’ INFLATION RATES, 1996–2000 (calculated by uniform measurement) CIAT 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 Avg. (1996–2000) Cum. (1996–2000) 4.7% CIFOR CIMMYT 2.8% 8.6% 9.3% 1.0% CIP ICARDA ICLARM 3.9% 3.5% 1.7% 4.6% 2.6% 4.1% 0.2% ICRAF ICRISAT 5.1% 2.4% IFPRI 5.3% 3.1% 1.6% IITA 8.6% 5.5% 4.2% ILRI 2.3% 2.9% 2.9% IPGRI 4.3% IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 5.1% 1.1% Total 4.5% 2.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.3% 2.7% 14.1% 4.2% (0.5%) 4.4% (1.2%) (0.2%) (5.7%) (2.9%) (1.9%) 0.8% 3.9% 11.6% 2.0% 1.7% 9.0% 4.1% (0.4%) 2.4% 1.1% 0.9% (1.5%) (5.7%) 0.8% (7.7%) 5.5% 1.2% 2.1% 0.0% 2.0% (1.7%) 0.7% 2.6% 1.3% (4.6%) 1.1% 7.0% (0.4%) 6.4% 6.4% 2.5% 2.2% 4.7% (1.8%) 10.0% 2.2% (14.5%) (1.5%) (2.1%) 3.1% (4.1%) 3.0% (0.4%) 16.2% (2.2%) 0.1% (0.1%) 0.8% (3.2%) 1.7% (0.3%) 8.8% (1.3%) 0.1% (0.9%) (0.9%) (1.1%) 1.9% 10.0% 0.6% 3.2% 1.7% 2.3% 0.4% (0.8%) (0.4%) 1.4% 7.2% 0.6% (0.1%) (0.6%) 3.1% (0.4%) (3.0%) 36.4% 11.6% 9.0% 12.2% Notes: The inflation rates are dollar-based annual rates for each Center. They are derived from: 1. The currency basket of a Center’s expenditures (Source: Centers' 2004 MTP submissions); 2. Annual inflation rates (as measured by the consumer price index) on the currencies in the basket (Source: IMF, International Financial Statistics); and 3. Annual changes in exchange rates of these currencies against the U.S. dollar (Source: IMF, International Financial Statistics). INFLATION RATES FOR SELECTED CURRENCIES AND REGIONS1 CURRENCIES U.S. dollar 2.9% 2.3% 1.6% 2.2% 3.2% Colombian CFA peso 2.7% 5.7% 4.7% 0.8% 2.2% 20.2% 18.5% 21.8% 11.2% 9.5% Mexican Philippine peso peso 34.4% 20.6% 15.9% 16.6% 9.5% 8.4% 5.1% 8.9% 6.7% 4.3% Pound sterling 2.4% 3.1% 3.4% 1.6% 2.9% Kenyan Indonesian shilling rupee 8.8% 12.0% 5.8% 2.6% 5.9% 7.9% 6.6% 57.6% 20.5% 2.0% REGIONS Western1 Hemisph. 23.8% 13.7% 10.2% 9.7% 8.7% Middle East 11.6% 6.6% 6.3% 0.0% 5.4% Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 1 Africa 22.8% 15.4% 6.0% 24.1% 3.9% Asia 7.7% 5.0% 9.3% (65.9%) 1.6% Excludes the United States and Canada. MOVEMENTS OF SELECTED CURRENCIES AGAINST THE U.S. DOLLAR2 Year 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2 CFA 2.5% 14.1% 1.1% 4.4% 15.6% Colombian peso 13.6% 10.1% 25.0% 23.2% 18.9% Mexican peso 18.4% 4.1% 15.4% 4.6% (1.1%) Nigerian naira 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 321.9% 13.5% Philippine peso 2.0% 12.4% 38.8% (4.4%) 13.1% Indonesian rupee 4.2% 24.2% 244.2% (21.6%) 7.2% Japanese yen 15.7% 11.2% 8.2% (13.0%) (5.4%) Positive percentages reflect devaluations; while negative percentages reflect revaluations. ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 3 77 TABLE A4.1 CENTERS’ FINANCIAL POSITIONS, 2000 (thousands of U.S. dollars) Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable: Donors Employees Others Inventories Prepaid expenses Other current assets Total current assets Fixed assets Property, plant, and equipment Less: accumulated depreciation Total fixed assets (net) Other assets Total assets Liabilities and net assets Current liabilities Bank indebtedness Accounts payable: Donors Employees Others In-trust accounts Accruals and provisions Total current liabilities Long-term liabilities Long-term loan Other Total long-term liabilities Total liabilities Net assets Unrestricted Unappropriated Appropriated Restricted Permanently Temporarily Total net assets Total liabilities/net assets Ratios/indicators Current ratio Working capital – in U.S. dollars Working capital – in days Operating fund – in days CIAT 5,873 5,831 127 1,255 328 339 1,000 14,753 23,008 12,555 10,453 122 25,328 CIFOR CIMMYT 6,241 2,794 218 676 437 10,366 4,687 2,509 2,178 38 13,765 33,953 19,633 14,320 3,909 8,266 420 914 218 CIP 5,477 3,572 268 323 571 167 399 10,777 10,844 7,489 3,355 ICARDA 12,219 4,954 311 801 380 505 19,170 26,273 21,916 4,357 ICLARM 8,014 3,075 261 1,171 4 15 2,775 15,315 257 67 190 320 15,825 ICRAF ICRISAT 1,023 19,408 4,719 122 2,453 149 71 3,080 449 1,592 942 400 IFPRI 8,276 3,327 IITA 17,258 6,361 470 966 106 173 25,334 37,929 30,783 7,146 ILRI 10,349 4,724 636 1,188 1,378 235 18,510 54,360 34,880 19,480 IPGRI 11,403 3,221 436 105 15,165 3,769 2,002 1,767 203 17,135 IRRI 31,336 4,180 214 1,233 925 505 38,393 28,085 18,253 9,832 12,539 60,764 ISNAR 3,278 635 12 137 27 4,089 3,333 2,819 514 IWMI 4,937 1,134 77 149 30 137 6,465 4,518 3,264 1,254 1,338 9,057 WARDA TOTAL 2,326 151,327 60,823 3,498 13,576 6,506 3,069 5,248 5,071 244,048 8,856 289,339 6,331 191,265 2,525 98,074 25,728 7,596 367,850 950 382 777 615 20 8,537 25,871 11,675 35,633 4,385 22,777 7,290 12,856 5,096 425 20,923 39,152 863 12,466 2,159 1,601 558 5,685 18,709 12,544 28,085 14,132 23,527 32,480 37,990 4,603 67 3,975 385 2,684 1,748 177 9,036 2,106 68 2,652 4,826 2,819 385 1,677 0 3,549 8,430 689 4,483 1,781 6,953 4,210 558 2,474 2,272 9,514 5,789 89 967 1,350 2,221 10,416 5,096 372 781 597 6,846 3,433 1,078 1,609 79 1,153 7,352 7,589 18 1,859 9,466 5,688 2,267 5,282 13,237 1,863 1,803 1,506 339 2,229 7,740 2,712 3,610 1,649 7,971 4,548 22 882 118 21,179 26,749 1,560 445 520 405 2,930 1,604 505 158 2,268 137 2,976 232 1,915 204 56,658 5,369 25,966 3,634 1,096 48,259 6,356 140,090 2,666 2,666 11,702 0 4,826 558 558 8,988 0 6,953 2,718 2,718 12,232 0 10,416 2,676 6,202 2,676 6,202 9,522 13,554 1,435 1,435 10,901 0 13,237 501 501 8,241 1,681 1,681 9,652 5,636 5,636 32,385 0 2,930 826 826 3,094 0 24,899 0 24,899 6,356 164,989 2,101 11,239 4,715 3,003 4,777 14,320 3,070 4,109 2,674 7,874 4,124 1,285 2,857 7,177 8,544 18,421 4,001 3,807 6,177 13,066 4,374 25,375 4,227 3,256 8,681 19,698 866 807 3,266 2,697 286 13,626 25,328 7,718 12,544 19,097 28,085 7,179 14,132 747 11,295 23,527 5,409 15,825 11,401 25,598 20,923 39,152 7,808 18,709 19,243 32,480 29,749 37,990 7,483 17,135 28,379 60,764 1,673 4,603 5,963 9,057 (1,285) 61,802 2,525 140,026 0 0 1,033 1,240 202,861 7,596 367,850 1.63 5,717 71 26 2.15 5,540 160 137 1.63 5,335 50 45 1.55 3,824 69 55 2.01 9,656 151 42 1.47 4,899 172 145 1.25 3.52 1,691 18,519 30 290 50 112 1.32 3,000 52 69 1.91 12,097 147 75 2.39 10,770 148 60 1.90 7,194 122 72 1.44 11,644 130 97 1.40 1,159 52 39 2.85 4,197 172 134 0.80 1.74 (1,285) 103,958 (50) 112 (50) 67 78 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A4.2 CAPITAL INVESTMENTS BY CENTERS, 1996–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 CIAT CIFOR CIMMYT CIP ICARDA ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 1.0 0.7 3.0 0.8 2.8 0.5 0.5 4.4 0.3 2.9 3.2 1.3 1.6 0.1 0.7 0.5 2.4 1.2 1.1 0.5 2.6 1.5 0.0 1.4 0.2 3.6 1.4 0.6 1.8 0.2 0.6 1.1 3.1 0.6 1.6 1.1 1.1 0.9 7.4 0.1 0.1 2.0 1.6 0.3 3.0 0.2 0.6 2.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 0.6 1.2 0.3 1.1 1.6 0.2 3.0 2.1 0.4 2.5 0.2 0.4 0.9 1.3 0.6 1.4 1.6 1.1 0.2 0.4 1.6 0.2 1.8 1.4 0.5 1.5 0.4 0.3 0.7 Total 24.4 20.3 25.7 18.0 14.9 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 4 79 TABLE A5.1 CGIAR TOTAL INVESTMENTS, 1972–2000 (millions of current U.S. dollars and percentages) 1972–76 $ Center CIAT 31 CIFOR CIMMYT 42 CIP 12 ICARDA 1 ICLARM ICRAF ICRISAT 20 IFPRI IITA 41 ILRI 14 IPGRI 1 IRRI 40 ISNAR IWMI WARDA 2 TOTAL 204 Undertaking1 Productivity 151 Environment 13 Biodiversity 1 Policy NARS 40 TOTAL 204 Commodity sector2 Cereals 114 Rice 51 Wheat 22 Maize 28 Legumes 31 Roots and tubers 29 Bananas/plantains Production Sectors 174 Livestock 29 Trees Fish TOTAL 204 Region Sub-Saharan Africa 86 Asia 70 Latin America and the Caribbean 39 West Asia and North Africa 9 TOTAL 204 Object Personnel 87 Supplies/services 58 Travel 11 Capital/depreciation 48 TOTAL 204 % 15% 21% 6% 0.5% $ 75 81 37 52 1977–81 % 12% 13% 6% 8% 1982–86 $ 116 118 60 101 % 11% 12% 6% 10% 1987–91 $ 158 163 100 117 % 11% 11% 7% 8% 1992–96 $ 172 26 153 116 111 35 78 159 69 174 134 82 207 54 46 47 1,663 757 245 140 172 349 1,663 601 283 120 114 191 229 61 1,082 222 101 35 1,440 656 537 277 192 1,662 900 540 110 112 1,662 % 10% 2% 9% 7% 7% 2% 5% 10% 4% 10% 8% 5% 12% 3% 3% 3% 100% 46% 15% 8% 10% 21% 100% 42% 20% 8% 8% 13% 16% 4% 75% 15% 7% 2% 100% 39% 32% 17% 12% 100% 54% 32% 7% 7% 100% 1997–2000 $ 127.0 47.0 137.7 89.3 97.4 41.7 85.8 94.8 79.1 124.1 107.4 82.4 130.0 38.2 36.3 39.5 1,358 496 250 144 172 296 1,358 448 207 92 80 161 172 34 815 149 138 46 1,148 558 433 232 136 1,358 676 509 97 76 1,358 % 9% 3% 10% 7% 7% 3% 6% 7% 6% 9% 8% 6% 10% 3% 3% 3% 100% 37% 18% 11% 13% 22% 100% 39% 18% 8% 7% 14% 15% 3% 71% 13% 12% 4% 100% 40% 31% 17% 10% 100% 50% 37% 7% 6% 100% TOTAL $ 679 73 694 414 479 77 164 651 235 759 625 232 789 160 82 171 6,284 3,377 755 388 416 1,348 6,284 2,528 1,146 531 478 885 839 95 4,346 964 239 81 5,630 2,623 1,919 1,019 723 6,284 3,316 2,015 429 524 6,284 % 11% 1% 11% 7% 8% 1% 3% 10% 4% 12% 10% 4% 13% 3% 1% 3% 100% 54% 12% 6% 7% 21% 100% 45% 20% 9% 8% 16% 15% 2% 77% 17% 4% 1% 100% 42% 30% 16% 12% 100% 53% 32% 7% 8% 100% 10% 20% 7% 0.5% 20% 69 8 92 84 12 94 3 13 617 433 56 15 7 106 617 274 126 65 51 111 82 467 126 11% 1% 15% 14% 2% 15% 0.5% 2% 100% 70% 9% 2% 1% 17% 100% 46% 21% 11% 9% 19% 14% 79% 21% 117 28 151 119 21 138 22 29 1,021 648 93 33 27 220 1,021 465 210 105 82 170 128 763 187 11% 3% 15% 12% 2% 14% 2% 3% 100% 63% 9% 3% 3% 22% 100% 49% 22% 11% 9% 18% 13% 80% 20% 191 51 178 167 34 181 43 40 1,422 893 98 55 38 338 1,422 626 269 127 123 221 198 1,045 250 13% 4% 12% 12% 2% 13% 3% 3% 100% 63% 7% 4% 3% 24% 100% 48% 21% 10% 9% 17% 15% 81% 19% 1% 100% 74% 6% 0.5% 19% 100% 56% 25% 11% 14% 15% 14% 86% 14% 100% 42% 34% 19% 4% 100% 43% 28% 5% 24% 100% 594 272 178 96 71 617 312 183 35 87 617 100% 44% 29% 16% 12% 100% 51% 30% 6% 14% 100% 949 449 285 155 134 1,021 564 302 70 85 1,021 100% 44% 28% 15% 13% 100% 55% 30% 7% 8% 100% 1,295 603 417 221 182 1,423 778 423 106 116 1,423 100% 42% 29% 16% 13% 100% 55% 30% 7% 8% 100% Note: Non-agenda investments are assumed to be in the same proportions as agenda investments. Values include all overhead costs. 1 Certain assumptions were made to calculate values in environment and biodiversity undertakings from 1972 to 1991. 2 The total for commodities is lower than in the other categories since not all Centers have commodity activity. 80 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A5.2 CGIAR TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND SOURCES OF REVENUE, 1991–2000 (millions of U.S. dollars) 1991 1991 U CIAT CIFOR 34.1 25.2 R 1992 1992 U R 1993 1993 U R 1994 1994 U R 1995 1995 U R 1996 1996 U R 1997 1997 U R 1998 1998 U R 1999 1999 U R 2000 2000 U R 8.9 32.2 23.8 8.4 33.3 25.5 2.4 2.4 7.8 35.1 25.4 4.8 4.5 9.7 34.6 23.0 11.6 36.8 24.5 12.3 33.3 20.6 12.7 33.5 19.0 14.5 30.7 16.3 14.4 29.5 13.2 16.3 0.3 8.9 7.2 1.7 9.7 7.1 2.6 10.6 8.5 2.1 11.1 7.2 3.9 12.7 8.6 4.1 12.6 7.2 5.4 CIMMYT 34.4 23.5 10.9 33.7 24.9 CIP 23.6 17.7 5.9 21.7 14.7 3.9 20.6 16.3 6.1 13.1 1.3 5.5 8.8 32.8 23.8 7.0 21.5 13.1 4.3 21.2 17.2 4.8 7.2 3.1 6.0 9.0 29.0 20.7 8.4 22.4 13.5 4.0 22.7 16.0 4.1 6.5 2.7 8.3 27.1 16.9 10.2 30.2 18.2 12.0 30.4 19.4 11.0 32.2 18.8 13.4 37.4 18.7 18.7 39.0 15.5 23.5 8.9 24.0 13.4 10.6 26.1 12.9 13.2 25.5 15.1 10.4 21.7 13.1 6.7 23.4 16.1 3.8 7.1 3.6 7.3 8.6 21.6 12.9 8.7 20.2 10.6 9.6 ICARDA 22.0 18.1 ICLARM ICRAF 7.3 23.2 12.1 11.1 27.6 16.0 11.6 23.6 12.2 11.4 22.8 11.8 11.0 23.4 10.6 12.8 3.5 8.6 4.0 4.6 8.5 5.1 3.4 10.4 6.6 3.8 12.4 7.2 5.2 10.4 5.1 5.3 7.6 13.8 7.8 16.7 5.2 11.5 16.8 9.5 17.4 7.4 10.0 22.2 9.1 13.1 21.1 9.5 11.6 21.8 8.9 12.9 20.7 7.3 13.4 9.5 ICRISAT 36.5 23.0 13.5 32.9 18.9 14.0 31.8 20.9 10.9 29.6 20.3 IFPRI IITA ILRI IPGRI IRRI ISNAR IWMI WARDA 13.7 12.1 Total 305 216 13.5 6.7 6.8 13.4 7.1 6.3 12.5 6.9 5.6 13.1 6.7 9.3 33.4 26.1 6.4 13.8 8.5 7.3 31.1 22.1 5.3 16.2 8.5 9.0 27.5 20.4 7.7 18.1 9.3 7.1 21.8 15.4 8.8 18.6 8.7 6.4 23.2 15.4 9.9 20.1 7.8 23.3 13.8 8.2 11.9 21.2 9.1 12.1 34.3 20.0 14.3 35.7 19.4 16.3 34.3 19.0 15.3 33.8 20.1 13.7 33.2 21.2 12.0 37.2 24.2 13.0 31.9 18.1 13.8 29.4 16.1 13.3 32.7 17.9 14.8 30.1 16.7 13.4 35.0 28.9 8.1 7.2 6.1 32.9 28.4 0.9 12.3 10.8 4.5 26.0 22.4 1.5 13.6 10.3 3.6 23.9 18.9 3.3 16.3 8.5 5.0 25.7 21.7 7.8 19.6 12.9 4.0 25.9 21.0 6.7 20.0 12.1 4.9 26.7 20.9 7.9 19.6 12.6 5.8 27.7 21.5 7.0 21.7 13.9 6.3 26.5 14.8 11.7 26.5 16.2 10.3 7.9 20.4 12.6 7.8 21.5 10.7 10.8 38.7 25.9 12.8 41.7 24.7 17.0 44.8 23.2 21.6 40.0 24.3 15.7 40.3 25.5 14.8 40.0 25.1 14.9 35.0 23.6 11.4 35.0 23.4 11.6 35.1 22.3 12.8 32.6 17.5 15.1 10.8 7.8 3.0 10.7 9.1 1.6 10.1 89 326 6.6 3.0 5.2 211 4.1 10.4 6.1 4.9 116 8.9 9.1 6.1 3.1 4.7 4.3 10.5 5.8 4.4 116 8.8 8.7 322 6.3 4.4 4.1 202 4.2 11.5 4.4 4.6 120 9.4 9.2 6.3 3.6 4.0 5.2 11.2 5.8 10.2 5.2 9.8 354 5.7 4.9 6.2 216 5.5 10.4 5.3 10.1 3.6 138 9.2 347 7.6 5.3 5.5 217 2.8 4.8 3.7 130 9.9 9.2 9.9 337 7.6 4.8 5.1 203 2.3 4.4 9.7 8.8 7.1 6.0 6.7 195 2.6 2.8 4.2 8.2 8.9 9.4 4.9 5.4 6.5 171 3.3 3.5 2.9 167 4.8 10.9 134 347 323 208 338 217 121 151 338 ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 5 81 TABLE A6.1 ACTUAL CGIAR PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 320 64% 13 14 346 141 40 51 11 63 6 7 320 1998 340 61% 13 0 353 148 44 52 13 61 7 12 340 World Bank United States Japan 893 7,458 37% 18% 19% 11% 12% 21% 8% 337 50% 37% 7% 6% 41% 32% 18% 10% 51.5 271.4 1.0% 127 1.80 15% 22.2 110% 1999 330 54% 11 0 340 126 48 52 15 66 6 15 330 World Bank Japan United States 907 7,721 34% 18% 20% 10% 13% 23% 9% 347 50% 38% 7% 5% 42% 32% 17% 9% 44.0 219.2 0.2% 122 1.63 13% 17.9 100% 2000 331 50% 14 0 5 350 128 44 54 14 66 7 19 331 World Bank United States Japan 873 7,642 36% 18% 18% 10% 14% 22% 9% 338 49% 39% 7% 5% 42% 32% 17% 9% 61.8 141.1 0.3% 112 1.74 18% 14.9 93% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 304 (of which percent unrestricted) 68% Center earned income 14 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 28 Advance/draw on reserves Total 346 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 112 Pacific Rim 43 North America 44 Developing countries 8 International and regional organizations 85 Foundations 6 Non-Members 5 Total 304 Top three contributors World Bank Japan United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 897 9,416 World Bank United States Japan 862 8,016 40% 19% 17% 11% 11% 21% 8% 333 51% 36% 7% 6% 41% 30% 17% 12% 43.0 272.8 2.6% 114 1.72 13% 21.7 105% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 40% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 18% Protecting the environment 17% Saving biodiversity 11% Improving policies 12% Strengthening NARS 21% (of which training) 8% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 326 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio 53% 34% 7% 6% 39% 33% 17% 12% 45.0 277.0 4.5% 105 1.53 Longer-term sustainability indicator Unappropriated net assets/revenue (percent) 13% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 25.0 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 127% 82 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.2 ACTUAL CIAT PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 31.7 60% 1.6 33.3 12.3 4.1 4.5 2.6 6.0 1.1 1.1 31.7 1998 32.1 55% 0.9 33.0 13.4 4.4 4.6 2.6 4.4 1.2 1.5 32.1 Japan World Bank United States 64 639 43% 28% 21% 13% 5% 18% 5% 33.5 53% 36% 7% 4% 22% 8% 68% 2% 4.2 19.4 (0.2%) 40 1.5 13% 3.0 214% 1999 28.7 50% 0.6 29.3 10.0 5.0 4.6 2.7 4.4 0.5 1.4 28.7 Japan World Bank United States 62 610 41% 27% 22% 13% 7% 17% 5% 30.7 52% 36% 8% 5% 23% 10% 66% 2% 2.8 19.3 (2.9%) 19 1.2 10% 2.7 183% 2000 29.2 1.0 0.6 30.7 10.2 4.2 4.4 2.3 5.4 0.7 2.0 29.2 Japan World Bank United States 58 638 42% 26% 23% 15% 5% 16% 5% 29.6 52% 36% 7% 4% 23% 12% 63% 2% 2.1 11.5 (1.9%) 71 1.6 7% 1.3 108% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 31.1 (of which percent unrestricted) 66% Center earned income 2.1 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) Advance/draw on reserves Total 33.2 Membership agenda support (millions Europe Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors World Bank Japan United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 76 650 of U.S. dollars) 11.0 4.6 5.0 2.0 6.8 1.1 0.6 31.1 World Bank Japan United States 60 678 44% 30% 17% 15% 4% 19% 6% 33.3 60% 28% 6% 5% 23% 8% 67% 1% 4.1 19.9 4.4% 52 1.5 12% 2.4 131% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 42% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 30% Protecting the environment 16% Saving biodiversity 17% Improving policies 4% Strengthening NARS 21% (of which training) 6% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 36.9 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Capital fund balance, Dec. 31 Annual Center cost change (percent)) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund / revenue (percent) 66% 25% 5% 4% 16% 12% 71% 1% 0.7 22.2 4.7% 33 1.2 2% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.0 Capital expenditure / depreciation (percent) 60% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 83 TABLE A6.3 ACTUAL CIFOR PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 10.6 80% 0.4 11.0 4.9 2.5 1.6 0.6 1.1 0.1 10.6 Japan European Commission United States 31 64 25% 0% 33% 16% 20% 6% 3% 10.6 42% 48% 6% 5% 27% 41% 32% 0% 4.6 3.0 (1.2%) 199 2.7 42% 1.2 240% 1998 11.3 65% 0.4 11.7 6.1 2.1 1.0 0.2 1.5 0.1 0.3 11.3 Japan European Commission World Bank 31 74 23% 0% 35% 13% 21% 8% 2% 10.6 42% 47% 7% 5% 28% 39% 33% 0% 5.3 3.0 (5.7%) 210 2.5 45% 0.6 126% 1999 11.5 64% 0.4 11.9 4.7 2.6 1.1 0.2 2.0 0.1 0.8 11.5 Japan World Bank Netherlands 30 86 24% 0% 35% 13% 21% 6% 2% 12.7 44% 46% 6% 4% 29% 37% 34% 0% 4.5 2.7 11.6% 147 1.9 38% 1.0 200% 2000 12.2 55% 0.4 0.3 12.9 6.2 1.6 1.0 0.3 2.2 0.0 0.9 12.2 Japan World Bank Netherlands 37 118 25% 0% 30% 13% 22% 10% 2% 12.6 46% 44% 6% 5% 30% 37% 34% 0% 4.7 3.0 2.0% 160 2.2 37% 0.6 100% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 8.7 (of which percent unrestricted) 82% Center earned income 0.4 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.3 Advance/draw on reserves Total 9.4 Membership agenda support (millions Europe Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors Japan European Commission United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 32 78 of U.S. dollars) 4.4 2.1 1.0 0.6 0.6 8.7 Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 22% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 0% Protecting the environment 34% Saving biodiversity 16% Improving policies 18% Strengthening NARS 10% (of which training) 2% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 9.4 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent)) 44% 46% 6% 4% 25% 46% 29% 0% 4.5 3.0 2.8% 249 2.7 48% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.7 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 187% 84 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.4 ACTUAL CIMMYT PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 28.6 62% 1.8 30.4 1998 30.1 55% 1.4 31.5 1999 33.8 45% 0.4 34.2 2000 37.5 37% 1.3 0.4 39.2 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 27.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 66% Center earned income 1.9 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 1.6 Advance/draw on reserves Total 30.9 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 8.3 9.8 3.3 6.2 1.6 6.3 0.8 0.6 28.6 9.7 3.6 6.5 1.6 6.7 1.1 1.0 30.1 10.2 4.4 6.4 1.8 6.7 0.8 3.5 33.8 United States World Bank Japan 86 746 36% 29% 19% 14% 4% 27% 14% 36.1 52% 39% 5% 4% 36% 30% 24% 10% 5.0 14.3 7.0% 48 1.5 15% 1.3 93% 10.7 4.4 6.7 2.1 7.1 1.2 5.2 37.5 United States World Bank Japan 86 795 37% 29% 19% 14% 4% 26% 14% 39.1 52% 39% 6% 4% 37% 28% 25% 10% 4.8 14.3 6.4% 50 1.6 13% 1.4 100% Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors 3.5 5.8 0.7 8.3 0.7 0.2 27.4 World Bank United States United States United States World Bank World Bank Japan European Commission European Commission Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 82 669 81 746 36% 29% 20% 13% 4% 27% 14% 30.4 54% 35% 7% 5% 32% 32% 26% 10% 8.1 13.8 9.3% 99 3.0 27% 1.1 79% 88 744 36% 29% 19% 14% 4% 27% 14% 32.2 52% 37% 7% 4% 32% 32% 26% 10% 7.4 14.0 1.0% 84 2.5 23% 1.3 94% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 34% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 25% Protecting the environment 27% Saving biodiversity 12% Improving policies 4% Strengthening NARS 23% (of which training) 9% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 28.8 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio 50% 36% 8% 6% 21% 37% 27% 15% 8.5 13.8 8.6% 103 1.5 Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 27% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 3.0 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 190% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 85 TABLE A6.5 ACTUAL CIP PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 22.6 57% 1.3 0.8 24.8 1998 22.2 61% 0.4 22.6 13.9 1.8 2.7 0.5 3.1 0.2 0.0 22.2 Switzerland World Bank United States 62 477 43% 25% 26% 9% 5% 17% 6% 21.7 48% 42% 7% 3% 18% 51% 26% 5% 1.5 12.4 1.7% 66 1.7 7% 1.2 188% 1999 20.0 56% 0.3 20.3 10.4 2.1 2.9 0.4 4.2 0.1 0.1 20.0 Switzerland World Bank United States 64 607 40% 24% 25% 10% 7% 17% 5% 22.7 48% 41% 8% 3% 18% 51% 26% 5% 0.2 12.4 (0.4%) 35 1.4 1% 1.1 154% 2000 19.9 52% 0.6 0.6 21.0 10.41 1.86 3.08 0.51 3.63 0.08 0.32 19.9 Switzerland World Bank United States 58 529 59% 34% 0% 15% 9% 16% 0% 20.2 44% 48% 6% 2% 18% 51% 26% 5% 3.1 4.1 2.5% 69 1.6 15% 1.6 320% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 22.7 (of which percent unrestricted) 56% Center earned income 0.2 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 1.5 Advance/draw on reserves Total 24.4 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 14.0 14.4 Pacific Rim 2.0 1.5 North America 2.0 2.5 Developing countries 0.3 0.4 International and regional organizations 4.1 3.8 Foundations Non-Members 0.3 Total 22.7 22.6 Top three contributors Switzerland European Commission Germany Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 63 576 Switzerland World Bank United States 64 519 43% 25% 26% 9% 5% 17% 6% 24.7 46% 42% 9% 3% 18% 51% 26% 5% 1.1 12.2 3.5% 57 1.4 4% 0.5 78% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 50% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 17% Protecting the environment 15% Saving biodiversity 15% Improving policies 7% Strengthening NARS 12% (of which training) 7% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 24.6 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 47% 41% 9% 3% 16% 49% 28% 7% 1.1 12.2 3.9% 58 1.4 4% 0.8 114% 86 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.6 ACTUAL ICARDA PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 21.1 55% 1.3 0.6 23.0 of U.S. dollars) 10.8 0.9 1.7 1.3 6.1 0.1 0.2 21.1 1997 22.0 48% 0.4 22.5 10.6 1.0 2.1 1.8 5.2 0.1 1.4 22.0 1998 25.2 55% 1.2 26.4 9.9 1.1 2.2 2.5 8.1 1.4 25.2 World Bank European Commission United States 83 323 47% 22% 20% 13% 5% 16% 4% 23.6 37% 46% 9% 8% 15% 12% 1% 71% 0.6 30.6 1.3% 159 1.8 2% 1.4 70% 1999 19.5 44% 0.8 20.4 6.6 1.2 2.1 2.8 5.5 0.1 1.3 19.5 World Bank Arab Fund United States 92 330 41% 21% 22% 15% 5% 17% 5% 22.7 42% 43% 10% 5% 15% 12% 3% 70% (1.2) 12.0 1.1% 147 1.7 (6%) 1.1 91% 2000 22.1 42% 1.1 0.5 23.7 8.01 1.14 2.07 2.39 7.21 0.08 1.22 22.1 World Bank Arab Fund United States 94 330 41% 18% 22% 17% 6% 14% 3% 23.4 38% 46% 11% 5% 15% 12% 3% 71% 2.7 8.6 0.1% 151 2.0 11% 1.1 92% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding (of which percent unrestricted) Center earned income Other income (non-agenda, and so on) Advance/draw on reserves Total Membership agenda support (millions Europe Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors World Bank European Commission European Commission World Bank Netherlands Germany Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 85 395 76 390 50% 24% 16% 11% 5% 19% 6% 27.6 38% 43% 10% 9% 0% 1% 1% 98% (0.8) 30.4 2.6% 107 1.9 (4%) 2.6 109% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 43% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 22% Protecting the environment 16% Saving biodiversity 10% Improving policies 4% Strengthening NARS 26% (of which training) 4% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 23.1 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 40% 41% 9% 10% 0% 1% 1% 98% 3.8 30.2 4.6% 154 1.7 17% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 2.8 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 122% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 87 TABLE A6.7 ACTUAL ICLARM PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 8.8 63% 0.2 9.0 1998 10.6 65% 0.3 10.9 5.4 1.0 0.9 0.5 2.6 0.3 0.1 10.6 1999 14.2 63% 0.2 14.4 5.2 1.4 1.3 0.5 5.5 0.0 0.4 14.2 2000 12.0 56% 0.5 0.3 12.8 4.43 1.52 2.13 0.43 3.13 0.09 0.27 12.0 Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 9.5 (of which percent unrestricted) 62% Center earned income 0.4 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.2 Advance/draw on reserves Total 10.1 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 4.3 4.40 Pacific Rim 0.8 0.79 North America 0.8 0.85 Developing countries 0.8 0.43 International and regional organizations 2.3 2.04 Foundations 0.3 0.16 Non-Members 0.2 0.14 Total 9.5 8.8 Top three contributors World Bank European Commission European Commission World Bank World Bank Netherlands World Bank Denmark European Commission European Commission Denmark Denmark World Bank United States United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 21 207 27 179 36% 20% 17% 16% 16% 16% 2% 8.6 58% 29% 9% 4% 30% 62% 3% 5% 1.6 4.3 0.2% 104 1.3 17% 1.5 510% 30 261 33% 19% 18% 10% 19% 20% 8% 10.4 50% 37% 11% 2% 30% 62% 3% 5% 1.5 5.2 (4.6%) 88 1.3 14% 1.2 479% 30 291 26% 12% 38% 1% 15% 19% 7% 12.3 45% 46% 7% 2% 30% 58% 4% 8% 1.9 1.3 4.7% 74 1.5 13% 0.0 0% 24 225 45% 10% 25% 1% 13% 15% 6% 10.4 44% 47% 9% 0% 31% 58% 4% 8% 4.1 1.3 (0.9%) 172 1.5 32% 0.2 513% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 38% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 13% Protecting the environment 17% Saving biodiversity 7% Improving policies 16% Strengthening NARS 22% (of which training) 1% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 8.7 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 47% 42% 9% 2% 6% 89% 2% 3% 0.7 2.5 4.1% 50 1.3 7% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.5 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 250% 88 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.8 ACTUAL ICRAF PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 21.8 40% 0.4 22.2 11.5 1.0 3.4 0.1 3.9 1.1 0.6 21.8 1998 20.4 43% 0.9 21.3 11.6 1.2 3.2 0.3 2.8 1.0 0.4 20.4 Canada World Bank Netherlands 56 313 40% 4% 18% 9% 11% 22% 17% 21.1 58% 26% 9% 7% 81% 12% 7% 0% 1.7 8.5 2.4% 79 1.3 8% 1.9 129% 1999 20.6 38% 0.7 21.3 10.3 1.3 3.7 0.3 4.0 0.6 0.5 20.6 Canada Sweden Netherlands 52 305 33% 5% 23% 4% 15% 25% 17% 21.8 53% 31% 11% 5% 79% 14% 7% 0% 1.8 8.3 (1.8%) 79 1.5 8% 0.8 72% 2000 21.4 37% 0.8 0.1 22.4 11.33 1.26 3.55 0.15 4.02 0.49 0.6 21.4 Canada Sweden Netherlands 47 258 29% 5% 23% 4% 17% 28% 20% 20.8 54% 31% 11% 5% 76% 17% 7% 0% 2.9 8.5 (0.9%) 30 1.3 13% 0.4 40% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 17.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 42% Center earned income 0.7 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 0.7 Advance/draw on reserves Total 18.8 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 8.5 Pacific Rim 1.1 North America 2.9 Developing countries 0.0 International and regional organizations 3.1 Foundations 1.3 Non-Members 0.5 Total 17.4 Top three contributors Canada Sweden World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 53 355 Canada Denmark World Bank 50 256 58% 7% 12% 7% 9% 14% 9% 22.2 50% 39% 5% 6% 76% 17% 7% 0% 1.5 8.4 4.1% 39 1.3 7% 1.3 101% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 48% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 7% Protecting the environment 14% Saving biodiversity 8% Improving policies 11% Strengthening NARS 19% (of which training) 8% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 17.3 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 61% 28% 6% 5% 80% 12% 9% 0% 0.3 6.0 5.1% 51 1.3 2% 0.5 63% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 89 TABLE A6.9 ACTUAL ICRISAT PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 26.9 76% 0.9 0.8 28.6 1998 26.5 76% 1.2 27.7 9.5 3.9 4.6 0.6 7.1 0.1 0.7 26.5 World Bank United States Japan 55 1,039 43% 25% 17% 15% 4% 20% 10% 21.8 54% 31% 3% 12% 50% 49% 1% 1% 5.4 48.3 1.1% 313 3.3 20% 0.5 19% 1999 21.2 63% 1.4 22.6 7.5 4.3 4.1 0.5 4.0 0.1 0.6 21.2 Japan United States World Bank 59 1,155 41% 25% 17% 13% 11% 18% 10% 22.9 54% 35% 4% 7% 47% 49% 2% 2% 4.4 20.2 10.0% 291 2.7 20% 1.2 75% 2000 21.3 56% 1.7 0.6 23.5 8.11 3.39 4.31 0.45 4.07 0.27 0.67 21.3 Japan United States World Bank 52 1,120 44% 27% 14% 10% 15% 18% 10% 23.2 54% 33% 7% 6% 50% 48% 1% 1% 7.2 18.4 (1.1%) 290 3.5 31% 1.6 114% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 27.5 (of which percent unrestricted) 82% Center earned income 0.7 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 4.1 Advance/draw on reserves Total 32.3 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 11.0 9.4 Pacific Rim 4.7 3.7 North America 5.0 4.6 Developing countries 0.8 0.6 International and regional organizations 6.0 7.9 Foundations 0.0 Non-Members 0.6 Total 27.5 26.9 Top three contributors World Bank Japan United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 84 1,787 World Bank United States Japan 62 1,273 54% 33% 12% 7% 6% 21% 8% 26.7 56% 30% 4% 10% 49% 50% 0% 0% (0.4) 48.6 (0.4%) 152 2.1 (2%) 1.1 39% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 52% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 31% Protecting the environment 19% Saving biodiversity 7% Improving policies 7% Strengthening NARS 16% (of which training) 7% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 28.8 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 55% 32% 5% 9% 49% 50% 0% 1% 0.6 54.3 2.4% 101 1.6 2% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 4.4 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 176% 90 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.10 ACTUAL IFPRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 18.2 52% 0.2 18.4 1998 20.1 51% 0.3 20.4 8.1 1.5 5.6 0.5 2.9 0.4 1.1 20.1 United States Denmark World Bank 43 75 0% 0% 6% 2% 59% 33% 11% 18.6 50% 41% 8% 1% 46% 26% 20% 8% 3.0 0.7 1.6% 113 1.7 15% 0.4 199% 1999 20.8 43% 0.5 21.4 7.4 1.4 5.1 1.3 3.2 0.5 2.0 20.8 United States World Bank Denmark 44 83 0% 0% 5% 1% 55% 39% 16% 21.2 50% 41% 8% 1% 47% 25% 20% 8% 3.6 0.7 2.2% 132 1.7 17% 0.2 116% 2000 21.4 43% 0.9 0.1 22.3 7.63 1.92 3.7 1.32 4.04 0.56 2.22 21.4 United States World Bank Denmark 52 90 0% 0% 10% 0% 61% 29% 15% 21.3 47% 44% 7% 1% 50% 26% 17% 7% 4.0 3.8 3.1% 52 1.3 18% 0.2 67% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 16.0 (of which percent unrestricted) 52% Center earned income 0.3 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 4.1 Advance/draw on reserves Total 20.4 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 5.0 6.1 Pacific Rim 1.8 1.9 North America 3.8 5.1 Developing countries 0.1 0.3 International and regional organizations 2.8 2.9 Foundations 0.9 0.7 Non-Members 1.5 1.2 Total 16.0 18.2 Top three contributors United States Japan World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 41 82 United States Denmark World Bank 45 81 0% 0% 9% 2% 62% 27% 14% 18.1 48% 43% 8% 1% 45% 26% 19% 10% 3.1 0.6 3.1% 70 1.7 17% 0.2 76% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 0% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 0% Protecting the environment 0% Saving biodiversity 0% Improving policies 88% Strengthening NARS 12% (of which training) 6% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 16.2 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 48% 40% 10% 2% 43% 27% 20% 10% 2.7 0.7 5.3% 90 1.4 13% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.3 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 100% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 91 TABLE A6.11 ACTUAL IITA PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 25.9 66% 1.5 4.1 31.5 1998 29.2 55% 0.8 30.0 11.6 3.9 7.3 0.2 3.6 0.5 2.0 29.2 United States Japan World Bank 78 1,250 56% 27% 17% 4% 4% 19% 6% 29.4 47% 36% 6% 10% 100% 0% 0% 0% 6.2 35.7 4.2% 131 1.6 21% 2.0 63% 1999 30.7 52% 1.7 32.4 11.4 4.5 7.4 1.6 4.2 0.6 1.0 30.7 United States Japan World Bank 79 1,090 47% 28% 14% 6% 6% 27% 8% 32.7 48% 38% 5% 9% 100% 0% 0% 0% 6.0 35.7 (14.5%) 125 1.7 19% 2.3 76% 2000 29.4 54% 0.9 30.3 8.13 3.83 9.2 1.12 4.95 0.64 1.53 29.4 United States Japan World Bank 83 1,043 50% 26% 15% 4% 9% 23% 5% 30.1 46% 40% 6% 8% 95% 2% 2% 0% 6.2 13.1 (4.1%) 147 1.9 20% 1.8 75% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 22.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 81% Center earned income 1.0 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 9.2 Advance/draw on reserves Total 32.6 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 9.5 10.8 Pacific Rim 4.3 3.4 North America 4.2 6.1 Developing countries 0.1 0.2 International and regional organizations 4.0 4.9 Foundations 0.4 0.3 Non-Members 0.0 0.2 Total 22.4 25.9 Top three contributors Japan World Bank United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 96 1,659 United States World Bank Japan 86 1,466 56% 26% 17% 3% 4% 20% 6% 28.5 50% 31% 6% 12% 100% 0% 0% 0% 5.5 35.5 5.5% 95 1.5 18% 3.1 91% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 51% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 24% Protecting the environment 18% Saving biodiversity 4% Improving policies 4% Strengthening NARS 23% (of which training) 4% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 28.5 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 51% 30% 5% 13% 100% 0% 0% 0% 5.4 35.3 8.6% 117 1.5 17% 2.9 83% 92 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.12 ACTUAL ILRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 26.0 75% 1.0 27.0 13.2 2.2 4.3 0.1 6.1 0.1 0.0 26.0 1998 24.4 75% 1.4 25.8 12.5 1.8 4.5 0.4 5.1 0.0 0.1 24.4 World Bank United States Switzerland 76 719 61% 3% 12% 9% 5% 13% 4% 27.7 50% 38% 4% 8% 67% 20% 11% 2% 3.9 26.0 2.9% 126 1.9 15% 1.6 73% 1999 26.6 56% 1.5 28.0 12.1 2.2 4.3 0.4 6.1 1.1 0.4 26.6 World Bank United States Switzerland 76 725 57% 8% 12% 7% 9% 15% 6% 26.5 48% 38% 5% 8% 67% 20% 11% 2% 5.4 24.1 (1.5%) 156 2.0 19% 1.8 86% 2000 23.0 55% 1.8 0.1 24.9 10.96 1.86 4.17 0.17 4.45 1.07 0.29 23.0 World Bank United States Switzerland 67 746 47% 7% 23% 5% 10% 15% 6% 26.5 50% 36% 6% 8% 67% 21% 10% 2% 4.4 25.4 0.4% 148 2.4 18% 1.4 70% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 24.8 (of which percent unrestricted) 80% Center earned income 1.2 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) Advance/draw on reserves Total 26.0 Membership agenda support (millions Europe Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors World Bank United States Switzerland Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 79 800 of U.S. dollars) 12.5 2.0 3.6 0.0 6.6 0.1 0.0 24.8 World Bank United States Switzerland 61 746 60% 2% 13% 8% 5% 14% 5% 26.7 54% 34% 4% 8% 80% 17% 3% 0% 6.2 26.1 2.9% 151 2.3 23% 1.4 64% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 63% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 2% Protecting the environment 5% Saving biodiversity 9% Improving policies 5% Strengthening NARS 18% (of which training) 3% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 26.0 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies / services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 54% 32% 4% 9% 78% 14% 8% 0% 7.0 26.0 2.3% 158 2.6 27% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 3.2 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 139% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 93 TABLE A6.13 ACTUAL IPGRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 18.8 67% 0.5 0.9 20.2 1998 21.2 63% 0.4 21.6 12.3 2.3 1.2 0.3 4.3 0.0 1.0 21.2 1999 20.1 61% 0.0 20.3 10.4 2.6 1.1 0.4 4.3 1.3 20.1 World Bank Japan Belgium 46 112 17% 13% 7% 37% 14% 26% 8% 20.6 44% 46% 8% 2% 27% 27% 23% 23% 2.2 3.0 (2.1%) 100 1.3 11% 0.3 75% 2000 22.3 52% 0.6 0.4 23.3 11.8 2.25 1.17 0.83 4.73 0.04 1.49 22.3 World Bank Japan Belgium 46 143 17% 13% 8% 37% 13% 25% 7% 21.5 44% 47% 7% 2% 28% 27% 23% 22% 4.2 3.3 0.8% 122 1.9 18% 0.5 125% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 16.4 (of which percent unrestricted) 77% Center earned income 0.4 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 5.3 Advance/draw on reserves Total 22.1 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 10.3 11.3 Pacific Rim 2.5 2.3 North America 1.1 1.2 Developing countries 0.2 0.4 International and regional organizations 2.3 3.3 Foundations Non-Members 0.4 Total 16.4 18.8 Top three contributors Japan World Bank Switzerland Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 41 86 World Bank World Bank Belgium European Commission Japan Belgium 41 109 14% 12% 6% 45% 12% 23% 6% 18.6 47% 45% 7% 1% 27% 27% 23% 23% 3.9 2.0 0.9% 81 1.5 19% 0.6 240% 43 108 16% 13% 7% 39% 13% 25% 8% 21.7 43% 48% 7% 2% 26% 26% 21% 27% 3.7 2.2 0.8% 96 1.7 17% 0.3 85% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 14% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 14% Protecting the environment 7% Saving biodiversity 45% Improving policies 13% Strengthening NARS 22% (of which training) (4%) Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 16.5 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 48% 43% 8% 1% 27% 27% 25% 20% 3.3 2.0 4.3% 89 1.5 15% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.3 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 650% 94 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.14 ACTUAL IRRI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 28.6 84% 1.8 6.8 37.2 1998 34.8 67% 3.2 38.0 11.6 10.7 4.7 1.6 4.8 0.9 0.5 34.8 Japan United States World Bank 94 835 39% 26% 30% 8% 9% 15% 4% 35.0 47% 39% 7% 8% 4% 93% 3% 1% 5.0 45.7 (7.7%) 249 1.8 13% 5.8 223% 1999 32.5 61% 1.4 33.9 9.0 11.4 4.7 1.2 5.1 1.1 0.2 32.5 Japan United States World Bank 82 960 36% 22% 28% 9% 11% 16% 4% 34.2 47% 39% 7% 7% 4% 92% 3% 1% 4.8 48.1 5.5% 253 1.8 14% 1.0 40% 2000 33.3 55% 1.6 0.5 35.4 10.81 10.47 4.81 1.1 4.9 1.03 0.19 33.3 Japan United States World Bank 79 997 41% 30% 22% 7% 12% 19% 8% 32.6 46% 39% 8% 7% 4% 92% 3% 1% 8.7 19.7 0.4% 130 1.4 25% 1.5 68% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 28.7 (of which percent unrestricted) 87% Center earned income 2.7 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 17.9 Advance/draw on reserves Total 49.3 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 8.8 8.8 Pacific Rim 9.2 9.1 North America 3.7 4.2 Developing countries 0.7 0.9 International and regional organizations 5.9 5.2 Foundations 0.5 0.5 Non-Members Total 28.7 28.6 Top three contributors Japan World Bank United States Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 64 1,374 Japan World Bank United States 82 830 44% 29% 22% 8% 7% 19% 5% 28.2 48% 38% 6% 8% 4% 92% 3% 1% 2.4 48.6 (1.5%) 237 1.9 7% 2.8 123% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 48% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 29% Protecting the environment 20% Saving biodiversity 7% Improving policies 8% Strengthening NARS 17% (of which training) 4% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 30.4 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 59% 30% 5% 7% 3% 94% 3% 0% 0.8 49.7 4.2% 180 1.4 2% 1.6 73% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 95 TABLE A6.15 ACTUAL ISNAR PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 9.9 72% 0.3 10.2 5.6 0.9 1.1 0.2 1.8 0.1 0.2 9.9 1998 9.6 76% 0.3 9.9 5.1 0.8 1.1 0.3 1.9 0.1 0.4 9.6 1999 8.2 69% 0.2 8.4 4.4 0.9 1.0 0.3 1.2 0.0 0.4 8.2 Netherlands Switzerland World Bank 45 40 0% 0% 0% 0% 39% 61% 20% 9.7 60% 31% 7% 2% 33% 23% 29% 15% 0.1 0.8 2.1% 22 1.1 1% 0.1 50% 2000 8.5 62% 0.1 0.3 8.9 3.95 0.8 0.98 0.14 1.86 0.0 0.76 8.5 Netherlands Switzerland World Bank 32 35 0% 0% 0% 0% 15% 85% 28% 8.2 56% 32% 10% 2% 38% 27% 29% 6% 0.9 0.8 0.0% 52 1.4 10% 0.4 200% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 10.7 (of which percent unrestricted) 57% Center earned income 0.3 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 4.9 Advance/draw on reserves Total 15.9 Membership agenda support (millions of U.S. dollars) Europe 5.1 Pacific Rim 0.8 North America 1.7 Developing countries 0.1 International and regional organizations 1.8 Foundations 0.0 Non-Members 1.3 Total 10.7 Top three contributors Netherlands World Bank Switzerland Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 38 53 Netherlands World Bank World Bank Netherlands Switzerland European Commission 53 35 0% 0% 0% 0% 39% 61% 18% 10.4 57% 33% 9% 1% 48% 17% 25% 10% 1.8 0.8 (5.7%) 79 1.9 18% 0.2 138% 46 38 0% 0% 0% 0% 48% 52% 21% 9.9 62% 29% 8% 1% 34% 15% 41% 10% 1.3 0.8 1.2% 62 1.5 13% 0.2 200% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 0% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 0% Protecting the environment 0% Saving biodiversity 0% Improving policies 26% Strengthening NARS 74% (of which training) 15% Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 11.3 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 57% 28% 14% 2% 54% 12% 23% 11% 2.0 0.8 (0.5%) 80 1.9 13% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.2 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 100% 96 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH TABLE A6.16 ACTUAL IWMI PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 9.5 54% 0.3 0.5 10.2 3.7 1.1 1.5 0.4 1.4 0.7 0.7 9.5 1998 9.4 54% 0.2 9.6 4.2 1.3 1.2 0.3 1.1 0.8 0.5 9.4 Japan Netherlands United States 22 238 1% 1% 49% 0% 24% 27% 0% 9.2 67% 20% 10% 4% 5% 76% 10% 9% 2.1 3.2 0.7% 187 2.8 22% 0.3 74% 1999 8.8 68% 0.2 9.0 2.9 1.3 0.9 0.2 2.8 0.4 0.4 8.8 World Bank Japan Sweden 25 226 0% 0% 42% 0% 32% 26% 0% 8.8 64% 20% 12% 4% 6% 75% 10% 9% 2.3 3.2 0.1% 205 2.1 26% 0.3 94% 2000 8.6 59% 0.4 0.2 9.2 2.84 1.27 1.05 0.35 2.05 0.18 0.84 8.6 World Bank Japan Sweden 26 211 0% 0% 40% 0% 35% 25% 12% 8.9 62% 21% 11% 6% 8% 81% 4% 7% 3.3 2.7 0.8% 172 2.9 36% 0.3 60% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 9.0 (of which percent unrestricted) 60% Center earned income 0.2 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 3.0 Advance/draw on reserves Total 12.2 Membership agenda support (millions Europe Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors Germany Netherlands World Bank Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 22 305 of U.S. dollars) 3.5 1.2 0.9 0.1 2.2 0.7 0.4 9.0 United States World Bank Netherlands 22 344 1% 1% 48% 0% 24% 27% 0% 9.6 63% 25% 8% 4% 5% 76% 14% 5% 2.8 3.3 2.0% 168 3.1 27% 0.6 161% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 1% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 1% Protecting the environment 48% Saving biodiversity 0% Improving policies 24% Strengthening NARS 27% (of which training) (11%) Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 9.2 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 64% 22% 10% 4% 11% 87% 3% 0% 2.8 3.1 5.1% 140 2.5 23% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 0.7 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 175% ANNUAL REPORT 2000 ANNEX 6 97 TABLE A6.17 ACTUAL WARDA PROGRAM AND RESOURCE HIGHLIGHTS, 1996–2000 1996 1997 8.6 57% 0.3 8.9 3.9 1.5 1.5 0.2 1.4 0.1 8.6 1998 10.5 54% 0.1 10.6 3.4 2.5 1.2 0.9 1.6 0.2 0.8 10.5 Japan World Bank Canada 22 325 36% 23% 17% 7% 9% 30% 15% 9.9 57% 29% 7% 8% 100% 0% 0% 0% (0.5) 15.0 2.6% (23) 1.1 (5%) 0.6 75% 1999 10.8 61% 0.3 11.1 3.5 2.1 1.1 0.1 3.1 0.2 0.8 10.8 World Bank Japan Netherlands 35 355 37% 23% 18% 7% 9% 28% 14% 11.0 53% 33% 6% 8% 100% 0% 0% 0% (0.1) 13.7 (0.1%) (31) 0.9 (1%) 2.7 300% 2000 8.5 72% 0.3 8.8 2.71 1.76 1.14 0.1 1.84 0.18 0.78 8.5 World Bank Japan Netherlands 30 364 31% 16% 21% 5% 11% 32% 12% 9.4 46% 38% 5% 11% 100% 0% 0% 0% (1.3) 2.5 (3.2%) (50) 0.8 (15%) 0.7 70% Center income (millions of U.S. dollars) Agenda funding 8.7 (of which percent unrestricted) 58% Center earned income 0.5 Other income (non-agenda, and so on) 1.6 Advance/draw on reserves Total 10.8 Membership agenda support (millions Europe Pacific Rim North America Developing countries International and regional organizations Foundations Non-Members Total Top three contributors Japan World Bank Netherlands Staffing (number) Internationally recruited staff Support staff 20 340 of U.S. dollars) 3.9 1.6 1.4 0.4 1.4 0.1 0.0 8.7 Japan World Bank Netherlands 21 300 32% 20% 25% 5% 11% 27% 7% 9.2 50% 34% 9% 8% 100% 0% 0% 0% (0.5) 13.8 (1.7%) 3 1.0 (6%) 1.1 157% Agenda program expenditures (percent) Increasing productivity 49% (of which germplasm enhancement/breeding) 16% Protecting the environment 16% Saving biodiversity 3% Improving policies 8% Strengthening NARS 23% (of which training) (6%) Total (millions of U.S. dollars) 9.9 Object expenditures (percent) Personnel Supplies/services Travel Depreciation Regional expenditures (percent) Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Asia Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) West Asia and North Africa (WANA) Center financial information Unappropriated net assets Appropriated net assets Annual Center cost change (percent) Short-term liquidity indicators Working capital (days expenditure) Current ratio Longer-term sustainability indicator Operating fund/revenue (percent) 50% 38% 5% 7% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0.8 12.8 19.2% 28 1.0 7% Fixed asset indicators Capital expenditure (millions of U.S. dollars) 1.1 Capital expenditure/depreciation (percent) 183% 98 CONSULTATIVE GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH