Eliminating Hunger: Yam for Improved Income and Food Security in West Africa Beatrice Aighewi, Norbert Maroya, Robert Asiedu, Djana Mignouna, Morufat Balogun and P. Lava Kumar 1. Introduction Yam is a monocotyledonous tuber crop in the family Dioscoreaceae. The genus includes more than 600 species worldwide (Mondo et al. 2020), but only a few are cultivated. Dioscorea rotundata is the most valuable and widely cultivated species in West Africa, followed by D. alata. D. cayenensis, D. dumetorum, and D. esculenta, which are also cultivated in limited quantities in the region. Yam is a crop of great value in many communities in West Africa, and it is mainly cultivated for its underground tubers, although some species also produce aerial tubers. The crop has the highest value of the aggregate production compared to other crops in West Africa (Elbehri 2013; Hollinger and Staatz 2015), with an apparent per capita consumption that increased fastest in major producing countries of Ghana and Nigeria over the period 1980–82 to 2007–09 (Hollinger and Staatz 2015). While some yam species are important as food, others provide useful pharmaceutical products (Price et al. 2016; Tohda et al. 2017). Diosgenin and dioscorin are compounds isolated from yam and used in the pharmaceutical industry (Obidiegwu et al. 2020). However, some yam species are not edible due to poisonous substances (Dave et al. 2020; Joob and Wiwanitkit 2014; Kyung-Sik and Taek Heo 2015; Yoon et al. 2019). Yam is grown as an annual with a duration from planting to harvest ranging from 8 to 12 months, depending on the agroecological conditions. Varieties in the forest region typically have a longer crop duration due to the longer rainy season than crops in the savanna. About 74.9 million tons of yam tubers are produced annually in the world on about 8.9 million hectares of land with an average yield of 8.5 t/ha (FAOSTAT 2021). Africa contributes 97.8% to world production, and Benin, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Nigeria, and Togo account for 93.9% of world production (FAOSTAT 2021). Nigeria alone produces 66.9% of global production. Yam is the fourth most utilized root and tuber crop globally after potato (Solanum spp.), cassava (Manihot esculenta), and sweetpotato (Ipomoea spp.), and it is the second in West Africa after cassava (Lev and Shriver 1998). 1 Where yam is produced, it is a significant food source and cash crop, thus combating malnutrition, food insecurity, and poverty (Obidiegwu et al. 2020). In Nigeria and Ghana, 31.8% and 26.2% of the population depend on yam for food and income security. Yam tubers have better nutritional attributes than other root crops (Shajeela et al. 2011). The tubers are a good source of essential dietary supplements such as protein and well balanced essential amino acids (Baah et al. 2009). Even where yam is not a significant crop in some parts of Africa, it is considered a famine food for small and marginal rural families and forest-dwelling communities during periods of food scarcity (Ngo et al. 2015). In West Africa, yam is most preferred when processed fresh. It is mainly consumed boiled in sauce or soup (using pieces directly from the tuber or frozen chips from a supermarket), made into a dough by pounding boiled tuber pieces or reconstituting from flour (as instant pounded yam or amala), roasted, or fried. Yam is often referred to as the “king of crops” in West Africa, and it is essential in the socio-cultural life of the population. It is used in ceremonies related to fertility and marriages, cultural rites of passage, thanksgiving, petitions, and annual festivals held to celebrate its harvest (Obidiegwu and Akpabio 2017; Nweke 2016). Poor seed and ware yam storage systems cause seasonality in the price and quality of available yams. Surplus during peak production season leads to price ‘crashes’, affecting farmers, while scarcity at other times causes a lack of affordability by consumers and undernutrition. Cropping of yam, especially seed, throughout the year therefore contributes immensely to the regional requirement for food and income. 2. Trends and Systems of Yam Production A 70 percent increase in global food production is required to feed an additional 2.3 billion people by 2050 (FAOSTAT 2021), while food production from developing countries should almost double. Yam production in West Africa increased from 8.3 million tonnes in 1961 to 74.2 million tonnes in 2019. Figure 1 shows a decline in the average world yield to a present average of 8.5 t/ha, although yam has a potential of 40 to 50 t/ha (Adewumi et al. 2022; FAOSTAT 2021). The increase in production is due to an expansion of the area cultivated (Frossard et al. 2017). However, low productivity in most production systems results from poor quality of soils and inputs, accompanied by little or no application of improved agronomic practices (limited weeding, low planting density, persistent virus infections, no pest and disease management). Although there are improved and released varieties in major producing countries such as Nigeria and Ghana, local landraces still dominate farmers’ varieties mainly due to challenges associated with large-scale multiplication 2 of seed to meet demand. Smallholder farmers who constitute the most producers mainly cultivate yam in the richest soils available to them. As fertility reduces, they use the land for other crops while yam cultivation is moved to more fertile soils. However, with an increase in population and pressure on agricultural land, the availability of fertile land is reducing. Therefore, marginal soils and non-traditional yam lands are put under cultivation to obtain the same yields or less. FFiigguurree 11.. TTrreennddss inin yyaamm pprorodduuccttiioonn aanndd yyiieellddss iinn WWeesstt AAfrfricicaa,, 11996611––22001199.. SSoouurrccee: : ((FFAOSTAT 202211).) . Trraaddiittiionalllly,, ffarrmers use whole tuberrss orr llaarrggee sseetttss ((sslilciceedd ppoortritoionns sofo ftutubebresr)s ) ofo2f 0200t oto5 5000g go orrm moorreea assp pllaannttiing materials (seeds)) and ppllaanntt inin mmoouunndds spprerpeparaerded usuisninggt otoppsosoili.l.M Moosstt yyaam ffaarrmers grow tthe crop wiitthouutt iinnppuutsts ssuucchh aas sfefertritliilziezre roro r unudnderetratkakeec rcoroppm maannaaggeemeenntt prraaccttiicceess tto cconttrroll peessttss aanndd ddisiseeaassees s(M(Migignnouounan aete atla. l. 2021051)5.).I tIti sisf rfreeqquueennttllyy iinntteerrccrrooppppeedd,, bbuutt ssoollee ccrrooppss aarree aalslsoo ccoommmmonon ini nWWesets At Afrficriac. a. AAt ht ahravrvesets,t,f afarmrmeerrsss soorrtt ssmaallll-- ttoo meeddiiuum--ssiizzeedd ttuubbeerrss ((220000 gg toto 11 kkgg) )fofor rrereuuses easa s seseededs,s,w whhilielel alargrgee-s-sizizeedd ttuubbeerrss ((>>11 kkgg)) aarree uusseedd aass ffoooodd.. TThheeyy aarree sstotoreredd aanndd eaetaetnen pipeiceecmemeaelalo orrs osoldldi ninm maarrkkeettss wwhheenn ccaasshh iiss nneeeeddeedd.. TThhee sseeeedd--ssizizeedd tutubbeersr saarer estsotorerded totob rberaekakd odromrmanacnycyb ebfeofroerep plalnantitninggin int htheen nexetxct rcorpopppininggs esaesaosonn, o, or rt htheyeya raerep plalnantetdedi n neinw nlyewprlyep parreepdafireedld fsiewldhse rwehthereey twheilyl bweildl obrem daonrtmuanntitl uthnetisl ttahret osftatrhte orfa itnhye sreaainsoy n thsreeaesoton ftohurerem too nfotuhrs mlaotenrt.hs later. 3 3 3. Opportunities for Increased Income, Employment, and Food Supply in Seed Yam Production Seed3. Otupbpoerrtsu nairtiee sefxopr Ienncsreivasee, dsIonmcoemteim, Eemsp laocycmoeunnt,tianngd Ffooord 6S3u%pp loyfi ntoSetaedl variable productYiaomn Pcroosdtus,c taionnd are bulky and expensive to transport (Manyong 2000; Agbaje et al. 2005). SAeesd ptluabnetrisngar emeaxtpeerniasilv, et,hseo ymaemtim teusbaecrc ohuanst ian gmfeoarg6e3r% mouf lttoitpallivcaartiiaobnle ratio of 1:3 to 1:p5r ocdoumctpioanrceodst st,oa nsodmare bcuelrkeyaalsn d(1e:x3p0e0n)s.i vTehteo tlroawns pmorut l(tMipalniycoantigo2n0 0r0a;tAe gibsa aje critical constraient ta lt.o2 0i0n5c).rAeasspilnagnt iynag m apterroiadl,uthcteioyanm atnudbe pr hroasdaumcteiavgietrym, rueltsiupllitciantigo ninra tthioeo fscarcity and hig1h:3 ctoo1s:t5 ocof mqpuaarleidtyto sseoemde ycearmea ls(A(1i:g30h0e).wTih eetlo awl.m 2u0l1ti7p)l.i cTathioen craotnesiseqaucreinticcael is that improvceodn,s trrealienat stoedin cyreaamsin vgayraimetpierso daurceti ornaraenldyp frooduuncdti vwityi,thre sfualrtimngeirns,t haensdca rtchitey use of and high cost of quality seed yam (Aighewi et al. 2017). The consequence is that farmer-ismavpreodv esde,erde liesa stehde ynaomrmva.r Aietbieosuatr ea rtahrierlyd foofu nhdarwvietshtefadrm yearms, atnudbethrse aursee oref served for seedfa rfmore rt-shaev endesxete dcrisotph.e Tnohrums., Afbroumt aat hWirdeosft hAarfvreicstaend yparmodtubcetrisoanr eorfe s7er0v.8ed million tonnes, fiotr ise eesdtifmorattheedn tehxat tc roovpe. rT 2h3u.s6, mfroimllioanW teosnt nAefrsi,c asnompreo douf cwtiohnicohf 7w0o.8umldil lhioanve been used ast foononeds,, iits irseessetirmvaetedd ftohra tpolvaenrt2in3.g6 mthileli onnetxotn cnreos,ps o(mFiegoufrweh 2ic)h. Cwoonultdinhuavoeubse reencycling of plantuinsegd masaftoeordi,ails orefsteernv erdedfourcpelasn qtiunagltihtye nbeyx taccrcoupm(Fiugluartein2)g. Cpoensttisn uaonuds rdeicsyecalisnegs. After of planting material often reduces quality by accumulating pests and diseases. After plantingpl,a snotimnge, sfoamrme fearrsm cearsnc satnilslt irllerseesrevrvee uupp ttoo aat hthiridrdof othf ethquea qnutitaynotfitsyee odfp sleanetde dplanted to replatocer epthlaocseeth tohseatth wat owuoludld eventutualalyllnyo tnsoptr osupt rdouue tt odpuooer tqou aplitoyo(rA iqguheawliit1y9 9(8A),ighewi 1998), fufurrtther deepplelteintignagp ao tpenotieanl ftoiaodl faonoddin acnomd einsocuormcee. source. Figure 2.F Yigaumre t2u. bYearms otuf bueprs toof u1 pktgo, 1wkhgi,cwh hairceh garoeogdo ofodrf olorclaolc afol foodo danandd eexxppoorrtt,, are used as seed andu csuetd ianstose medinanisdecttust oinft 3o0m tion i5s0et tgs foofr3 0mtuol5t0ipglifcoartmiounl.t iSpoliucartcieo:n P. Sicoturrces: Pbiyct uauretshors. by authors. The traditional methods to produce seed yam include cutting ware-sized tubers The traditional methods to produce seed yam include cutting ware-sized tubers into seeidn tsoizseee,d hsairzve,ehstairnvges ttihneg stahme sea mcreocpro tpwtiwceic e(th(thee fifirrsstt hhaarrvveesstti sisu usesdedfo frofro ofodod and the secoand tfhoers esceoendd)f, osrosreteidn)g, s osreteindg seizeed stiuzebeturbse, ras,nadn duussiningg onllyyt htehhee hadeapdor tpionrstions of tubers (oAf tiugbheersw(iA iegth eawl.i e2t0a1l5. )2.0 1T5h).eTshee soepotpiotinons smullttiipplylyy aymamve rvyesrloyw slylowwitlhy nwo ith no guarantgeuea roafn steeeeodf qseueadlqituya.l iTtyh. iTsh sisitsuitautaitoionn ffoorrmmeeddt hthe eb absaissfiosr ftohre tYhaem YImampr oIvmempernotvement for Incfoomr Inec oamneda ndFFoooodd SSeceucruitryitiny Wienst AWfriecsat( YIAIFfSrWicAa ) i(nYitIiaItFivSeWofAth)e Iinnteitrinaattiivonea l of the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). The focus was on developing 4 methods to improve the quality of seed yam and rapidly multiply the seed to meet the needs of farmers for increased productivity. Any technology to rapidly multiply the crop is an opportunity to develop seed yam production-related businesses as a source of income, especially for youths and women. The development of hitherto non-existent seed yam enterprises will fill the gap in the supply of quality seed yam and create job opportunities. 4 Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA). The focus was on developing methods to improve the quality of seed yam and rapidly multiply the seed to meet the needs of farmers for increased productivity. Any technology to rapidly multiply the crop is an opportunity to develop seed yam production-related businesses as a source of income, especially for youths and women. The development of hitherto non-existent seed yam enterprises will fill the gap in the supply of quality seed yam and create job opportunities. 4. The Key Elements of the YIIFSWA Project YIIFSWA is a ten-year project, implemented from 2011 to 2021 with grants provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) in two phases of five years each. The project’s focus was to improve the productivity of yam through enhancing its seed systems. 4.1. Summary of Achievement of the First Phase of the YIIFSWA Project The first five years of the YIIFSWA project (September 2011 to December 2016) facilitated activities to increase yam productivity (yield and net output) by 40% for 200,000 smallholder farmers in Ghana and Nigeria. Another goal was to generate international research goods that will double the income of 3 million yam producers in a 10-year horizon. During this first phase, YIIFSWA initiated the development of formal yam seed production systems, leading to the first set of certified seed yams for sale to ware yam producers in May 2016. This significant step in developing the yam seed market was critical to sustaining commercial production and marketing of high-quality seed yam. Diagnostics tools for virus detection and technologies for elimination of virus infected sources from seed production, high-ratio propagation technologies (HRPTs) such as the Temporary Immersion Bioreactor System (TIBS) and aeroponics, and seed yam quality management protocols as well as quality standards for seed yam certification were developed. Over 65,000 farmers were trained to improve their seed production techniques using the adaptive yam minisett technique (YIIFSWA 2017), which is similar to what is used in the traditional seed production system (Aighewi et al. 2014). Yam-growing households in Ghana and Nigeria were characterized through a baseline survey (Mignouna et al. 2014a, 2014b). Economic assessments showed gains from the various technologies emanating from YIIFSWA and their relative profitability (Mignouna et al. 2020). Thousands of training materials (flyers, books, videos, and posters) were produced and disseminated to stakeholders to improve their capacities in seed and ware yam production, handling, and marketing (YIIFSWA 2017). 5 4.2. Summary of Achievements of the Second Phase of the YIIFSWA Project (YIIFSWA-II) A primary goal of the YIIFSWA II project was to significantly increase yam productivity by at least 30% by delivering clean, quality seed yam of improved varieties to at least 320,000 smallholder farmers for long-term benefits in Nigeria and Ghana. This initiative aimed to improve the yield gains of the rural and urban poor, with more gender-equitable income for participants in the yam value chain. The project achieved its vision of demand creation, improving production systems and enhancing the enabling environment for improved varieties through four objectives: i. Increase productivity and income by empowering smallholder ware yam producers with the seed of improved varieties. Three improved and released varieties of D. rotundata (TDr 89/02665 named Asiedu and TDr 95/19177 named Kpamyo) and one of D. alata, (TDa 98/01176 named Swaswa) were introduced to farmers in demonstration plots to show the potential of improved varieties. Their mean productivity was higher than that of the local farmers’ preferred varieties amounting to 38% productivity increase. The project developed functional and sustainable seed systems by strengthening national agricultural research institutions to produce high-quality breeder seed yam of improved varieties using the TIBS. In 2020, the Ghana Crops Research Institute (CRI), with the assistance of the YIIFSWA-II project, produced 350% of its target of 21,840. The Savannah Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) in northern Ghana, with the support of the project, established its first TC Laboratory since inception and produced 399% of its yearly target of 8736 breeder seed plantlets using TIBS. The National Root Crops Research Institute (NRCRI- Umudike) of Nigeria produced 104% above its target of 21,840 breeder seeds in 2020. The breeder seeds produced by NRCRI were partially distributed to two private seed companies (Nwabudo Agro Seeds and Inputs Ltd. and Strategic Seeds Nigeria Ltd.) and to the Federal Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. In total, 221,735 breeder seeds were produced by IITA and NARIs within the year 2020 exceeding the target production of 71,872 by 309%. ii. YIIFSWA developed, demonstrated, and trained private seed companies on foundation seed production models using best management practices in aeroponic and hydroponic systems. These activities were aimed to deliver high-quality seeds of improved varieties to farmers at the right time and prices to encourage adoption through commercial seed entrepreneurs. One of the primary outcomes of the project was to establish a functional, scalable, and sustainable foundation and commercial seed systems that are driven by the 6 private sector. The project accomplished this by identifying and developing the capacities of nine private seed companies in Ghana (3) and Nigeria (6). These seed companies together with some of the NARIs produced about 3.6 million foundation tubers of 25 g each in 2020. iii. Raise the awareness of policy makers of the economic impact of the yam sector through advocacy and information dissemination strategies, including developing and implementing investment targets to popularize YIIFSWA’s improved seed yam technologies for increased production, adoption, and scaling. This was to influence key stakeholders and decision-makers to raise the profile of yam in relevant fora and debates in Nigeria, Ghana, and beyond. This caused the Federal Government of Nigeria to include yam in its list of priority crops. In addition, new investments were engaged in the yam development sector, especially in seed yam for Ghana and Nigeria totaling USD 1,959,159 (USD 1,509,968 and USD 449,191 in Nigeria and Ghana, respectively). iv. Empower women to participate profitably in the commercial yam seed value chain. Customarily, women’s participation in the yam value chain is limited due to some socio-cultural settings. The project was deliberate in ensuring that women were part of the seed yam value chain. Randomly selected yam farmers in Nigeria have been growing yam for a mean period of 17.5 and 26.57 years for female and male, respectively, while in Ghana, female experience was 18.37 years and males 19.34 years. Only 35.93% of females and 52.68% males had heard of a yam project in the last seven years. It was observed that 19.57% of females and 31.83% of males had heard about the YIIFSWA project, while only 14.57% of females and 20.37% of males had benefited from the programme. The same trend was also observed in Ghana. Out of the total number of farmers trained on the adaptive minisett technique of seed yam production during the first phase of the project, 39.6% were women. During the second phase, female-owned private seed companies were targeted for partnership and capacity building. Hence, there was one each in Nigeria and Ghana out of the total of nine for both countries. The implementation of YIIFSWA II ensured that all the advances made in establishing the yam seed system by YIIFSWA were fully transferred to and operationalized by National Agricultural Research Institutes (NARIs) and private seed companies. Additionally, enhanced on-farm agronomic packages were accessible and utilized by seed and ware yam farmers to increase productivity and income generation. Beneficiaries of the project include seed and ware yam producers and their family members, processors, marketers, transporters, and consumers. 7 5. Novel Yam High Ratio Propagation Systems: Outcomes and Prospects in Adaptation to Climate Change and Nutrition Security The YIIFSWA project developed and standardized a tissue-culture-based heat therapy combined with a meristem culture procedure to generate virus-free yam planting material. This procedure had a 73% success rate in eliminating the yam mosaic virus (YMV), the most frequently contaminating virus in yams in West Africa (Balogun et al. 2017a). This procedure established YMV-free stocks of 25 yam genotypes consisting of improved varieties and landraces, which were used as stocks for rapid bulking of clean planting material using the TIBS, an advanced high-ratio in vitro propagation technology also standardized by YIIFSWA. Plantlets from TIBS are of better quality than those from conventional tissue culture (CTC). TIBS plantlets are more vigorous and resilient to post-flask acclimatization. Due to more efficient process control, large batches are handled more easily for scale-up propagation with lower risks of mix-ups. The propagation ratio in TIBS was five to six per plantlet every eight to ten weeks compared to three to four every 12 to 16 weeks in CTC (Balogun et al. 2017b). Up to 300 single-node vine cuttings were obtained per plant that was derived from TIBS plantlet and grown aeroponically (Maroya et al. 2014c, 2017), while the drip system hydroponics further saves on electricity needs in the production system (Balogun et al. 2020, 2021). About 100 single-node vine cuttings can be made per TIBS plantlet using hydroponics after eight weeks of growth, with 95% rooting success followed by field planting. After five months of hydroponic growth, the seed tubers ranged from 5 g to 220 g per plant. Aeroponics yam propagation started under the YIIFSWA project in 2013 at IITA-Ibadan, Nigeria (Maroya et al. 2014a, 2014c). Atomizing nozzles ensure the most effective nutrient delivery in this system by turning the nutrient solution into a mist, which is absorbed through the cell walls of the plant’s roots by osmosis. Genotypes of both D. rotundata and D. alata were successfully propagated with aeroponics using both pre-rooted and freshly cut two-node vine cuttings. Three types of planting materials are generated from the aeroponics production system: mini-tubers which range from 0.2 g to 110 g depending on the genotype, harvest age, and the composition of the nutrient solution, the aerial bulbils from both water yam and white yam varieties, and single-node cuttings from vines (Maroya et al. 2014b). All the propagules had a propagation rate of over 90%. Yam vine cuttings were previously known to grow slowly, but those from aeroponic plants produced new leaves 14 to 21 days after planting. The single-node vine cuttings from aeroponic plants produce an average of 200 to 300 cuttings per plant in four to six months. A manual was produced to help private seed companies to establish their aeroponics 8 systems with step-by-step instructions for building and managing the system for foundation seed production (Maroya et al. 2017). In 2017, the YIIFSWA-II project funded each of five selected seed companies with USD 30,000, half of the cost to build a screen-house and an aeroponics system. The project produced and distributed virus-indexed plantlets for multiplication to seed companies. Relevant stakeholders were trained, including postgraduate degree students, to apply various propagation techniques through participatory research. After training, new technical information on the high ratio propagation of yam was constantly provided, accompanied by backstopping partners and other stakeholders. The capacities of the seed regulatory agencies of Nigeria, the National Agricultural Seed Council (NASC); and of Ghana, the Plant Protection and Regulatory Services Directorate (PPRSD); were also enhanced. As coordinators in the management of seed quality in their respective countries, they were trained and provided with equipment to ensure that high-quality seeds of authentic varieties were produced and sold. 6. Improved Yam Seed Systems as Key to Building Resilience in Production to Enhance and Sustain Food Security A functional yam seed system is essential to build resilience in the ware yam production systems. As the most critical and expensive input of yam production, the seed should be healthy to generate healthy plants in the field and reduce yam’s current high postharvest losses estimated at 30%. Seed health influences the shelf life of harvested ware tubers or postharvest storage quality since pests and diseases are easily transferred from the field into storage and over different seasons through the seed. Therefore, a yam seed system must have protocols to ensure the production of seed tubers at a high rate of multiplication. Rapid propagation of pest- and disease-free seeds and a network of commercial seed producers within a formal seed system are crucial for disseminating improved varieties for sustained and increased productivity. Extension services were used to educate farmers on plant health management in the field to recognize pest and disease symptoms and carry out positive selection practices to sustain good yields. Technologies for breeder seed production were transferred to the following NARIs, the National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB) and the National Root Crops Research Institute (NRCRI) in Nigeria, and the Crops Research Institute (CRI) and Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) in Ghana. These institutions were provided with equipment and supplies for backup electricity, TIBS, post-flask handling and documentation, and initial clean stock of planting 9 Technologies for breeder seed production were transferred to the following NARIs, the National Center for Genetic Resources and Biotechnology (NACGRAB) and the National Root Crops Research Institute (NRCRI) in Nigeria, and the Crops Research Institute (CRI) and Savanna Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) in Ghana. These institutions were provided with equipment and supplies for backup mealteecrtiraiclsit.yT, hTeIBNSA, pRoIsst-nfolawskp hroanvdidliencgl eaannd bdroeecudmerepnltaantitoinn,g amnda tienriitailasl tcoleparni vsatotecks eoefd copmlapnatinnige smfoartefroiualnsd. aTthioen NseAeRdIsp rnoodwu cptiroonv.ide clean breeder planting materials to privTahtee sienendo cvoamtiopnans idese vfoerl ofopuenddbaytioYnI IsFeSeWd pArotoduimctiporno. ve yam seed systems have addedThvea liunenotvoatthioensy admevcerlooppedby buy sYinIIgFSvWinAes tfoo rimpproropvaeg aytaimon .seBede fosyrestenmows ,hyavaem viandeds ewde vrealmuea itnol tyhceo ynasmid cerroedp basy tuhseinagp pvainreastu fosrf oprrompaanguaftaiocntu. rBienfgorpeh nootows,y ynatmha vteins efos r stworeargee minatiunblye rcso. nInsitdheernedew ass etehde parpopdaurcattiuosn sfoyrs temmasn,ulefaacfltuesrsinngo dpahloctuotstyinngthsaatrees ufsoerd storage in tubers. In the new seed production systems, leafless nodal cuttings are in TIBS, while those with leaves are planted in various hydroponic systems or rooted used in TIBS, while those with leaves are planted in various hydroponic systems or anrdoopteladn atendd ipnlathnteefide ilnd t(hFei gfuierled 3()F.igTuhree n3o).d Tahl ec untotidnagls cwutittihngles awf ictahn leaalsf ocabne apllsaon bteed diprelacntltyedin dtihreecfitleyl dinfo rthsee efdieylda mfopr rsoedeudc tyioanm. Mpreotdhuocdtsioonf. pMroedthuocdinsg omf ipnritoudbuecrisngo f lemssinthitaunbe1r0s go,f wlehssic hthapne r1fo0 rgm, wexhcieclhle pnetlryfoirnms eeexdceyllaenmtlyp riond suecetdio yna(mA ipgrhoedwuicteiot na l. 20(2A1i)g,hheawvei aelts oalb. ee2n02d1e),v ehlaovpee da.lsIfo wbiedeenly daedvoeplotepdedb.y Isfe ewdidcoemly paadnoiepst,etdh ebrey wsoeeudld becolmespsapnrieess,s uthreereo nwouuslidn gbey laemss pturebsesrusrefo ornf uoosidnga ynadms etuebde.rsS fixors feoeodd caonmd pseaendi.e Ssixin Nsigeeedri acoamnpdatnhireese inin NGighearniaa aanrde uthsrieneg itnh Ge hinannoa vaartei ounsisndge tvheel oinpneodvaatniodnssc daleevdelboypethde YIaInFdS WscAalepdr objye ctthfeo Yr IsIeFeSdWpAro pdruocjetciot nfo. r seed production. FFiigguurree 33.. TTyyppeess ooff yyaamm pplalannttiinngg mmaatteerriiaallss ((aa)).. IInn vviittrroo ssiinnggllee nnooddee ccuuttttiinnggss ffoorr mmuullttiipplliiccaattioionn ini ntemtepmorpaoryr aimrymiemrsmione rbsiioorneacbtioorr seyasctetomrs;s (ybs)t Eexm vsi;tro(b n)odEaxl cvuitttriongns owditahl leaf for multiplication in various hydroponics systems, soil, and composite media; (c). cMutitniintugbserws iftrhomle eaxf vfiotrro msinuglltei pnloidcae tpiolanntisn fovr avrinioeu asndh tyudbreor pploannitcinsgs mysatteermiasl ,psroodilu,catinodn cionm thpeo fsieiltde omr escdrieae;n(hco)u. sMe. Sinoiutrucbe:e Prsictfurorems beyx avutihtroorss. ingle node plants for vine and tuber planting material production in the field or screenhouse. Source: Pictures by authors. 9 10 The HRPTs developed by YIIFSWA are contributing to the efficient production of end-user preferred improved varieties. According to previous studies by CIRAD and partners, flour from dried chips made from the late maturing, multiple tubering (5–10 tubers per plant) varieties of D. cayenensis and D. rotundata with relatively high dry matter content (around 40%) and tolerance to poor soil conditions were most demanded for preparation of amala, a popular food in Nigeria and Benin. This link between food demand and preferred variety confirms that seed systems need to choose their promoted varieties based on market demand. However, the delivery rate of improved varieties is slow due to the low propagation ratio in traditional yam cultivation, where cropping is seasonal, with a single annual production cycle that is significantly limited by season (Orkwor and Asadu 1998). Weather elements are also crucial for yam production ranging from water, light, nutrients, and temperature. Yam requires 20 ◦C to 30 ◦C for optimum growth. However, according to the IITA’s Geospatial laboratory, in 2015, temperatures lower than 20 ◦C were recorded only in January and December, a period that is typically outside the crop growth period, while at least 7 out of the 12 months in 2005, 2010, 2015 and 2017 recorded higher than 30 ◦C (Personal communication) with associated rising air temperature and carbon dioxide levels. The impact of climate change on the yam yield, including its vulnerability to climate-change-related soil conditions, has been discussed by Srivastava et al. (2012). Just as drought causes significant losses, floods also cause significant yield losses (Balogun and Gueye 2013). These climate-related scenarios force farmers to vacate flood- or drought-prone farmlands or risk immense losses due to inadequate photosynthetic rates, tuber bulking, and premature senescence. While there have been significant breakthroughs in the real-time availability of geographical information systems, its utilization in timing yam production is yet to be entirely scaled and adopted at the level of producers and processors. The scarcity of clean planting materials (Aighewi et al. 2015, 2021), dormancy of the tuber for about four months, and uncontrolled sprouting after dormancy break limits the control of the cropping calendar by farmers and reduces profits (Craufurd et al. 2001). This established need for resilient, climate-smart mitigation strategies is also addressed by the gains from the YIIFSWA project, especially in terms of yam cropping cycles. Seed production can be carried out in controlled environments during the offseason, and ware yam production timed to maximize the available rainy period. Table 1 shows the timing of seed yam production based on the traditional system relative to the HRPTs. Two cropping cycles are possible per year, from May to December and October to August. Previously, 14 t/ha at 40,000 stands for seed yam 11 production was recorded. If the same land is used, up to 30 t/ha will be produced per cycle when vine cuttings are used, giving 60 t/Ha per year. With continuous availability of seed yam from the HRPTs, ware yam can be produced throughout the year, combining the traditional cycle of October to July with the HRPT cycle of May to December. This scheme is more amenable to delayed rains if supplemental irrigation is provided. Significantly more land can also be used for yam production due to 500-fold more seed yam, which culminates in more food availability. Table 1. Seed yam production based on novel high ratio propagation technologies. Before Current Revolution (Now) Prerequisite Stock One tuber One tuber 6 gives 6 Cut portions mother 6 gives 6 mother plants plants October to August January to May/June July to December 6 mother Year 1 6 mother ure plantlets in laboratory plants plants × 30 180 Tissue Cult nodes cleaned CTC Lab Production 6 cut of 3240 180 × 3 = 540 × 3 = 1620 × 2 = breeder TIBS Lab, Year 2 portions per 1620 3240 mother plant 540 plantlets plants in AS, HS, Air = 36 in 11 TIBS plantlets in seedlings in 32 TIBS Vivipak Aeroponics Cooling and Hydroponics 6 cut portions Production of 3240 × 100 = Year 3 from 36 324,000 single node vine Field planting of breeder vine Supp mother seedlings from AS/HS plants seedlings for foundation seed, plants = 216 in nurseries 324,000 seed tuber production irrigation 6 cut portions Field planting of foundation Year 4 from 216 Dormancy of foundation seed seed tubers certified seed Supp mother tubers production using AYMT irrigation plants = 1296 (324,000 × 2 = 648,000) AS = aeroponic system; HS = hydroponic system. Source: Maroya et al. (2022). van Etten et al. (2017) has established that the access farmers have to quality seed and the functionality of seed systems in relation to production, distribution, innovation, and regulation determines the efficacy in contributing to sustainable agrobiodiversity and food systems. Available evidence has shown that the YIIFSWA II project has impacted all four aspects. However, it is necessary to incorporate good practices for efficient soil and water management as well as good agronomic and agroecological practices that mitigate and enhance the adaptation to climate change in future projects. 12 An additional benefit of the novel high-ratio propagation system is the mitigation against hidden hunger. Nutrients can be dosed to yam grown in aeroponics and hydroponics systems. High-quality planting materials of improved varieties are disseminated as reported by a study conducted by YIIFSWA (unpublished) to determine the nutrient components that limit the propagation ratio and quality of plantlets in the TIBS. Using white and water yam varieties, Kpamyo and Swaswa, respectively, the nitrogen (N), potassium (K), and phosphorus (P) concentrations in culture medium were determined every two weeks for ten weeks and in plantlets at transplanting. After eight weeks of culture, the pH and refractometer values for medium acidity and sugar concentration were determined in the varieties. In Swaswa, N, P, and K in the medium reduced by 83.8, 96.2, and 28.7%, while it was 63.3, 61.2, and 23.1% in Kpamyo over the ten-week period. Reduction in K concentration at two weeks was limited to Swaswa. In Kpamyo, adding P at two weeks and N at six weeks would be beneficial. Thus, it is necessary to consider diet requirements from seed production to determine optimum fertigation regimes. This will ensure that plants absorb the available nutrients in sufficient quantities for storage in tubers, which can also be fortified with additional micronutrients if processed into other products after harvest. 7. Outcomes and Impact on Reducing Hunger by Raising Food Security Food security is commonly defined as the access by all people to sufficient food for active and healthy life (World Bank 1986). Three critical dimensions implicit in this definition are (i) the availability of sufficient quantity and appropriate quality of food supplied through own production or otherwise; (ii) access by all households and individuals to enough and adequate resources to acquire such food; and (iii) the utilization of this food through an adequate diet, water, sanitation, and health care (Timmer 2012). In the developing world, household food security is largely linked to food availability from household production. Gifts and transfers from friends and relatives also play essential roles. Food purchased are also common but limited due to a lack of liquidity. 7.1. Changes Perceived in Household Food Consumption Status of Yam Growing Areas of Nigeria and Ghana Food deficit was the main periodic shock experienced by most households across the yam-growing areas of Nigeria and Ghana. This type of vulnerability results from qualitative analysis considering the respondents’ perception about the number of households affected by food shortages and the frequency of food shortages during a 13 season. To assess the farm household’s food consumption during surveys organized by the YIIFSWA project, memory recall on different food shortage scenarios in the past 12 months was employed. Following the baseline survey, an end-line survey was performed within the same major yam-producing zones in Nigeria and Ghana using the same multistage, random sampling design, drawing on 1400 households based on the same sampling frame (Mignouna et al. 2016). The respondents were asked whether their households ha d sufficient food during the previous year. Figure 4 shows how households peorccceaisvioednatlh feoiordf oshoodrtsaegceu drietycresatasteuds b. yT 2h7is%p peoricnetps tfiroonmw aabsouotb 6s2e%rv teod 3t5o%b, ewdhiiflfee trheen t behtowueseenhothldest twhoatr roeupnodrtseodf hsauvrivnegy as. fAoofdte rsuthrpelpusro ijneccrte’sasfierds tbpyh 2a6s%e, fcrhoamn gaebsoiunt s8h%o ctok s fa3c4e%d b(yFihgouures e4h)o. ldAslmpuorsst uninog dthifefeirrelinvceel ihwoaosd osbtrsaetrevgeyd wbeertwe neeonti cheodubsyehcoolmdsp athriantg threeiprobratesdel innoe fsoiotuda sthioonrttaogeth beuet nndo lsiunrep. lus and food shortage throughout the year. FFiiggure 4. Channggeess inin hhoouusesheohlodl dfofoodo dcocnosunmsupmtiopnt iostnatsutsa tiun sai n12a-m1o2n-mtho pnetrhiopde rfoior dyafomr ygarmowginrgo whoinugsehhooludss eihn oNldigseirnia Nanigd eGrihaanaan.d SoGuhrcaen: a(M. Sigonuorucnea: (eMt ailg. n20o1u4naa, 2e0t1a4bl., 22001174aa,, 22001147bb,).2 017a, 2017b). IPnoNsitiigveer ciah,anfrgoems inth feoobda csoelnisnuemtoptieonnd stlaintues, whoeures erehpooldrtsedr,e apnodrt tehdesae prerdobuacbtiloyn resulted from increased productivity due to interventions of the YIIFSWA project. in food shortages throughout the year from about 5% to 1%. In comparison, They are good indicators of food security improvement in the region, likely due to reYpIoIFrtSsWoAn ’os ccinatseirovneanltfioonosd. sThhoirst atgraenssdlaetcerse aisnetod far ocmon3t2ri%buttoioanb oouf t t2h6e% p(rFoijgeuctr ein4 ). Hroeudsuechinogld vsutlhnaetrarbeipliotyrt etod fnooodf oiondsecsuhroirtyta agme,obnugt rnuoraslu hropuluseshionlcdrse ainse tdhef rsoumrvaeybeodu t 44a%reatso. 54% during the two periods. Households reported that food surplus was almost unchanged during the same periods. In Ghana, the remarkable observations 7.2. Project Impact on Food Security Total household expenditure includ14ed expenditures on non-food items and consumables. Under food expenditure, all the food items consumed by the household during a year were collected. Food consumption included food that the household purchased, produced, and received from other sources. The total expenditure on food, obtained by aggregating expenditure on all food items, was used to estimate the project’s impact on food security. The total expenditure for each food group was calculated by aggregating the expenditure of all food and non-food items falling within a group. The results of the propensity score matching (PSM) presented in Table 2 show that the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) of YIIFSWA project on food security (per capita expenditure on food) of beneficiaries in Nigeria and Ghana were about USD 55 and USD 94 for the Radius Matching 13 from baseline to the end line are that the proportion of households that reported occasional food shortage decreased by 27% points from about 62% to 35%, while the households that reported having a food surplus increased by 26% from about 8% to 34% (Figure 4). Almost no difference was observed between households that reported no food shortage but no surplus and food shortage throughout the year. Positive changes in food consumption status were reported, and these probably resulted from increased productivity due to interventions of the YIIFSWA project. They are good indicators of food security improvement in the region, likely due to YIIFSWA’s interventions. This translates into a contribution of the project in reducing vulnerability to food insecurity among rural households in the surveyed areas. 7.2. Project Impact on Food Security Total household expenditure included expenditures on non-food items and consumables. Under food expenditure, all the food items consumed by the household during a year were collected. Food consumption included food that the household purchased, produced, and received from other sources. The total expenditure on food, obtained by aggregating expenditure on all food items, was used to estimate the project’s impact on food security. The total expenditure for each food group was calculated by aggregating the expenditure of all food and non-food items falling within a group. The results of the propensity score matching (PSM) presented in Table 2 show that the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT) of YIIFSWA project on food security (per capita expenditure on food) of beneficiaries in Nigeria and Ghana were about USD 55 and USD 94 for the Radius Matching technique. These results imply that the beneficiaries that profited directly or indirectly from the project are more food secure than the non-beneficiary farmers. In summary, this study sought to find out the average treatment effect on the treated, which gives the average effect of the project on food security. The results showed a positive impact on food security, implying that the increase in productivity generated by the project interventions led to increased household food security and poverty reduction in the region. 15 Table 2. Impact of YIIFSWA on food security. SWA Country Parameter YIIFSWA YIIF Beneficiaries Non-Beneficiaries Difference S.E. Nearest Neighbor Matching Unmatched 348.90 291.10 57.80 17.57 Nigeria ATT 350.52 295.54 54.98 19.46 ATU 290.50 325.00 34.50 . ATE 38.16 . Unmatched 715.32 630.36 84.96 179.19 ATT 718.09 623.95 94.14 175.80 Ghana ATU 635.62 721.47 85.85 . ATE 89.41 . ATT: Average Treatment Effect on the Treated; ATU: Average Treatment on Untreated; ATE: Average Treatment Effect. USD 1 = GHS 1.85 = NGN 157. Source: (Mignouna et al. 2014a, 2014b, 2017a, 2017b). 8. Conclusions The YIIFSWA initiative has focused on efficient seed yam propagation and production, significantly impacting the yam value chain. The project has developed high-ratio propagation technologies and seed-health management innovations to improve the seed quality and increase productivity by supplying yam farmers with healthy seeds. The new methods emphasize using vines and minitubers of less than 10 g to produce seed tubers and free large quantities of tubers for food. Stakeholders’ capacities were enhanced through training on improved seed production methods and equipment to build resilience and sustainability, and increase seed production for income, nutrition, and food security. 9. Recommendations The gains from the innovations contributed by the YIIFSWA project are visible. However, greater emphasis is required for scaling innovations, especially in certified seed production, for higher impact. Further research efforts are necessary to identify cheaper alternatives in the novel seed yam propagation technologies that will increase the profit margins in seed yam businesses. Studies are also required to identify the most appropriate agronomic practices and control of yam tuber dormancy to allow integration into cropping cycles in the face of production intensification and the changing climate. 16 Author Contributions: Conceptualization, B.A.; writing—original draft preparation, B.A., R.A.; writing—review and editing, B.A., N.M., R.A., D.M., M.B., P.L.K.; project administration, N.M., R.A.; funding acquisition, IITA: R.A., N.M., P.L.K., M.B., D.M. and B.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, bearing Investment Number OPP1159088. Grant to the International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, November 2016 to 31 December 2021. IITA receives funding for research on yams from the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers, and Bananas (CRP-RTB) between 2011–2021 and the ongoing CGIAR Seed Equal Initiative, both supported by CGIAR Trust Fund donors. Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results. References Adewumi, Adeyinka S., Paterne A. Agre, Paul A. Asare, Michael O. Adu, Kingsley J. Taah, Jean M. Mondo, and Selorm Akaba. 2022. Exploring the Bush Yam (Dioscorea praehensilis Benth) as a Source of Agronomic and Quality Trait Genes in White Guinea Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) Breeding. Agronomy 12: 55. [CrossRef] Agbaje, Olubunmi G., Lucia O. Ogunsumi, J. A. Oluokun, and T. A. Akinlosutu. 2005. Survey on the Adoption of Yam Minisett Technology in South-Western Nigeria. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 3: 222–29. Aighewi, Beatrice A. 1998. Seed yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.) Production and Quality in Selected Yam Zones of Nigeria. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria; p. 252. Aighewi, Beatrice A., Norbert Maroya, and Robert Asiedu. 2014. Seed Yam Production from Minisetts: A Training Manual. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 36. Aighewi, Beatrice A., Norbert Maroya, P. Lava Kumar, Morufat Balogun, Daniel Aihebhoria, Djana Mignouna, and Robert Asiedu. 2021. Seed Yam Production Using High-Quality Minitubers Derived from Plants Established with Vine Cuttings. Agronomy 11: 978. [CrossRef] Aighewi, Beatrice A., Osei Kingsley, Ennin A. Stella, and P. Lava Kumar. 2017. Practices to Improve the Quality of Seed Yam Produced by Smallholder Farmers. A Seed Yam Production Guide. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 22. Aighewi, Beatrice A., Robert Asiedu, Norbert Maroya, and Morufat Balogun. 2015. Improved Propagation Methods to Raise the Productivity of Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.). Food Security 7: 823–34. [CrossRef] 17 Baah, D. Faustina, Busie Maziya-Dixon, Robert Asiedu, Ibuk Oduro, and William O. Ellis. 2009. Nutritional and Biochemical Composition of D. alata (Dioscorea spp.) Tubers. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 7: 373–78. Balogun, Morufat O., and Badara Gueye. 2013. Status and Prospects of Biotechnology Applications to Conservation, Propagation and Genetic Improvement of Yam. In Bulbous Plants: Biotechnology. Edited by Kishan Gopal Ramawat and Jean-Michel Merillon. New York: CRS Press, pp. 92–112. Balogun, Morufat, Norbert Maroya, Beatrice Aighewi, Djana Mignouna, Mark Nelson, and Jason Nickerson. 2021. Manual for Seed yam production in Hydroponics system. Croydon: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) & Context Global Development (CGD), p. 34. Balogun, Morufat O., Norbert Maroya, Beatrice Aighewi, P. Lava Kumar, Djana Mignouna, Ihuoma Okwuonu, Marian Quain, Adedotun Afolayan, and Emmanuel Chamba. 2020. Capacity strengthening and breeder seed yam production. Paper presented at the 4th YIIFSWA II Annual Review and Planning Meeting, Bolton White Hotel, Abuja, Nigeria, February 18–21; Available online: http://yiifswa.iita.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/04/2019-end-of-year-report-on-pre-basic-seed-production.pdf (accessed on 15 July 2021). Balogun, Morufat O., Norbert Maroya, Joao Augusto, Adeola Ajayi, Lava Kumar, Beatrice Aighewi, and Robert Asiedu. 2017a. Relative Efficiency of Positive Selection and Tissue Culture for Generating Pathogen-free Planting Materials of Yam (Dioscorea spp.). Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 53: 9–16. [CrossRef] Balogun, Morufat O., Norbert Maroya, Joao Taiwo, Chukwunalu Ossai, Adeola Ajayi, P. Lava Kumar, Olugboyega Pelemo, Beatrice Aighewi, and Robert Asiedu. 2017b. Clean Breeder Seed Yam Tuber Production Using Temporary Immersion Bioreactors. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 66. ISBN 978-978-8444-89-3. Craufurd, Peter O., Rodney J. Summerfield, Robert Asiedu, and Vara Prasad. 2001. Dormancy in Yams. Journal of Experimental Agriculture 37: 75–109. [CrossRef] Dave, Buenavista P., Nikko Manuel A. Dinopol, Eefke Mollee, and Morag McDonald. 2020. From Poison to Food: On the Molecular Identity and Indigenous Peoples’ Utilisation of Poisonous “Lab-o” (Wild Yam, Dioscoreaceae) in Bukidnon, Philippines. Cogent Food & Agriculture 7: 1870306. [CrossRef] Elbehri, Aziz. 2013. West Africa’s Food Potential: Policies and Market Incentives for Smallholder-inclusive Food Value Chains. Rome: The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the International Fund for Agriculture Development. FAOSTAT. 2021. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. On-Line and Multilingual Database. Available online: http://faostat.fao.org/ (accessed on 30 November 2021). 18 Frossard, Emmanuel, Beatrice A. Aighewi, Sévérin Aké, Dominique Barjolle, Philipp Baumann, Thomas Bernet, Daouda Dao, Lucien N. Diby, Anne Floquet, Valérie K. Hgaza, and et al. 2017. The Challenge of Improving Soil Fertility in Yam Cropping Systems of West Africa. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1953. [CrossRef] Hollinger, Frank, and John M. Staatz. 2015. Agricultural Growth in West Africa Market and Policy Drivers. Rome: African Development Bank and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Joob, Beuy, and Viroj Wiwanitkit. 2014. Asiatic Bitter Yam Intoxication. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine 4: S42. [CrossRef] Kyung-Sik, Kang, and S. Taek Heo. 2015. A Case of Life-threatening Acute Kidney Injury with Toxic Encephalopathy caused by Dioscorea quinqueloba. Yonsei Medical Journal 56: 304–6. [CrossRef] Lev, Larry S., and Ann L. Shriver. 1998. A Trend Analysis of Yam Production, Area, Yield, and Trade (1961–1996). In Actes du Seminaire International CIRAD-INRA-ORSTOM-CORAF CIRAD. Edited by Julien Berthaud, Nicolas Bricas and Jean-Leu Marchand. Montpellier: L’igname, Plante Seculaire et Culture d’avenir, pp. 13–20. Available online: https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers17- 08/010014891.pdf (accessed on 30 November 2021). Manyong, M. Victor. 2000. Farmers’ Perceptions of the Resource Management Constraints in Yam-based Systems. Project 13: Improvement of Yam-Based Systems. In Annual Report 1999. Ibadan: IITA, pp. 3–4. Maroya, Norbert, Morufat Balogun, and Robert Asiedu. 2014a. Seed yam production in an aeroponics system: A novel technology. In YIIFSWA Working Paper Series No 2 (Revised). Yam Improvement for Income and Food Security in West Africa. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 20. Maroya, Norbert, Morfa Balogun, Beatrice Aighewi, Djana B. Mignouna, P. Lava Kumar, and Robert Asiedu. 2022. Transforming Yam Seed Systems in West Africa. In Root, Tuber and Banana Food System Innovations. Edited by Graham Thiele, Michael Friedmann, Hugo Campos, Vivian Polar and Jeffery W. Bentley. Cham: Springer. [CrossRef] Maroya, Norbert, Morufat Balogun, Beatrice Aighewi, Jimoh Lasisi, and Robert Asiedu. 2017. Manual for Clean Foundation Seed Yam Production Using Aeroponics System. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 68. ISBN 978-978-8444-88-6. Maroya, Norbert, Morufat Balogun, Robert Asiedu, Beatrice Aighewi, P. Lava Kumar, and Joao Augusto. 2014b. Yam Propagation Using Aeroponics Technology. Annual Research and Review in Biology 4: 3894–903. [CrossRef] Maroya, Norbert, Robert Asiedu, P. Lava Kumar, Djana Mignouna, Antonio Lopez-Montes, Ulrich Kleih, David Phillips, Fadel Ndiame, John Ikeorgu, and Emmanuel Otoo. 2014c. Yam Improvement for Income and Food Security in West Africa: Effectiveness of a Multi-Disciplinary and Multi-Institutional Team-Work. Journal of Root Crops 40: 85–92. 19 Mignouna, Djana B., Adebayo Akinola, Tahirou Abdoulaye, Arega Alene, Norbert Maroya, Beatrice Aighewi, Thomas Wobill, and Robert Asiedu. 2016. YIIFSWA Working Paper Series No 7. Impact Evaluation Protocols for Agricultural Projects: The Case of Yam Improvement for Income and Food Security in West Africa, Impact-Evaluation Guidelines. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 70. Mignouna, Djana B., Akinola Adebayo, Tahirou Abdoulaye, Arega Alene, Victor Manyong, Norbert Maroya, Beatrice Aighewi, Lava P. Kumar, Balogun Morufat, Antonio Lopez-Montes, and et al. 2020. Potential Returns to Yam Research Investment in Sub-Saharan Africa and Beyond. Outlook on Agriculture 49: 215–24. [CrossRef] Mignouna, Djana B., Maroya Norbert, Aighewi Beatrice, Kumar Lava, Akinribido Bolanle, Ikeorgu John, Abdoulaye Tahirou, Akinola Adebayo, Alene Arega, Manyong Victor, and et al. 2017a. Impact Assessment Report of YIIFSWA Project. Raising Household Income, Improving Food Security and Reducing Poverty in Nigeria. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 48. ISBN 978-978-8444-94-7. Mignouna, Djana B., Maroya Norbert, Aighewi Beatrice, Kumar Lava, Abdoulaye Tahirou, Akinola Adebayo, Otabil Prince, Braimah Haruna, Alene Arega, Manyong Victor, and et al. 2017b. Impact Assessment Report of YIIFSWA Project. Raising Household Income, Improving Food Security and Reducing Poverty in Ghana. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 48. ISBN 978-978-8444-95-4. Mignouna, Djana B., Tahirou Abdoulaye, and Adebayo Akinola. 2015. Factors Influencing the Use of Selected Inputs in Yam Production in Nigeria and Ghana. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 116: 131–42. Mignouna, Djana B., Tahirou Abdoulaye, Arega Alene, Robert Asiedu, and Victor M. Manyong. 2014a. Characterization of Yam-growing Households in the Project Areas of Ghana. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 95. ISBN 978-978-8444-45-9. Mignouna, Djana B., Tahirou Abdoulaye, Arega Alene, Robert Asiedu, and Victor M. Manyong. 2014b. Characterization of Yam-Growing Households in the Project Areas of Nigeria. Ibadan: International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), p. 92. ISBN 978-978-8444-46-6. Mondo, Jean M., Paterne A. Agre, Alex Edemodu, Patrick Adebola, Robert Asiedu, Malachy O. Akoroda, and Asrat Asfaw. 2020. Floral Biology and Pollination Efficiency in Yam (Dioscorea spp.). Agriculture 10: 560. [CrossRef] Ngo, Ngwe M.F.S., N. Denis Omokolo, and Simon Joly. 2015. Evolution and Phylogenetic Diversity of Yam Species (Dioscorea spp.): Implication for Conservation and Agricultural Practices. PLoS ONE 10: e0145364. [CrossRef] Nweke, Felix I. 2016. Yam in West Africa: Food, Money and More. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press. Obidiegwu, Jude E., and Emmanuel M. Akpabio. 2017. The Geography of Yam Cultivation in Southern Nigeria: Exploring its Social Meanings and Cultural Functions. Journal of Ethnic Foods 4: 28–35. [CrossRef] 20 Obidiegwu, Jude E., Jessica B. Lyons, and Cynthia A. Chilaka. 2020. The Dioscorea Genus (Yam)—An Appraisal of Nutritional and Therapeutic Potentials. Foods 9: 1304. [CrossRef] Orkwor, Gabriel C., and Charles L. A. Asadu. 1998. Agronomy. In Food Yams. Advances In Research. IITA and NRCRI, Nigeria. Edited by G. C. Orkwor, R. Asiedu and I. J. Ekanayake. Ibadan: INTEC Printers, pp. 105–41. Price, Elliott J., Paul Wilkin, Viswambharan Sarasan, and Paul D. Fraser. 2016. Metabolite Profiling of Dioscorea (Yam) Species Reveals Underutilised Biodiversity and Renewable Sources for High-value Compounds. Scientific Reports 6: 29136. [CrossRef] Shajeela, P. S., Veerabahu R. Mohan, Jesudas L. Louis, and Soris P. Tresina. 2011. Nutritional and Antinutritional Evaluation of Wild Yam (Dioscorea spp.). Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 14: 723–30. Srivastava, Amit K., Thomas Gaiser, Heiko Paeth, and Frank Ewert. 2012. The Impact of Climate Change on Yam (Dioscorea alata) Yield in the Savanna Zone of West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 153: 57–64. [CrossRef] Timmer, Peter. 2012. Behavioral Dimensions of Food Security. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109: 12315–20. [CrossRef] [PubMed] Tohda, Chihiro, Ximeng Yang, Mie Matsui, Yuna Inada, Emika Kadomoto, Shotaro Nakada, Hidetoshi Watari, and Naotoshi Shibahara. 2017. Diosgenin-rich Yam Extract Enhances Cognitive Function: A Placebo-controlled, Randomized, Double-blind, Crossover Study of Healthy Adults. Nutrients 9: 1160. [CrossRef] [PubMed] van Etten, Jacob, Isabel L. Noriega, Carlo Fadda, and Evert Thomas. 2017. The Contribution of Seed Systems to Crop and Tree Diversity in Sustainable Food Systems. Available online: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/handle/10568/89755 (accessed on 15 July 2021). World Bank. 1986. Poverty and Hunger: Issues and Options for Food Security in Developing Countries. Washington, DC: World Bank. YIIFSWA. 2017. Yam Improvement for Income and Food Security in West Africa Project Achievements and Recommendations Report. Submitted on 28 February 2017 to BMGF. Yoon, Jae C., Jae B. Lee, Tae O. Jeong, Si O. Jo, and Young H. Jin. 2019. Symptomatic Hypocalcemia Associated with Dioscorea tokoro Toxicity. Journal of the Korean Society of Clinical Toxicology 17: 42–45. [CrossRef] © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). 21