SHARED CONTROL OF NATURAL RESOURCES (SCOR) SCOR '''ORK PLAN (1993-1995) International Irrigation Management Institute (IIMI) Sri Lanka Country Programme 107, Havelock Road, Colombo S, Sri Lanka SCOR seeks to increase the users' share of control of natural resources in selected watersheds through partnerships between the state and users that contribute to greater production while conserving the natural resources ~ase. SCOR will promote integrated planning for the use of land and water resources in two pilot watersheds with spread effects to other areas. The SCOR project is a collaborative effort of the Government of Sri Lanka, the United States Agency for International Development (USAIDI and the 11M!. 1. ~ 2. ~ E 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure la Figure 2a Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8 Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 11 Map 1 Map 2 Annex 1 Annex 2 Annex 3 Annex 4 Annex 5 Annex 6 Annex 7 Annex 8 CONTENTS Introd uction ................................. 1 Huruluwewa Watershed .......................... 2 Upper-Nilwala Watershed ......................... 6 Mode of Implementation ........................ 10 Monitoring and Evaluation ....................... 18 Proposed research studies under SCOR ............... 25 Work plan of Huruluwewa Watershed ................ 33 Work plan of Upper-Nilwala Watershed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Sketch map of current status of Meegaswewa Cascade .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. lla Anticipated status after SCOR intervention ............ lla Typical Landscape Profiel- Huruluwewa Watershed ....... 12 SCOR Perception of a possible future ................ 12 Sketch of typical landscape profJle of sub-watersheds in Nilwala Watershed . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . 13 Anticipated status of the model landscape in Ihala Millawaela sub-watershed after SCOR intervention . . . .. 13 A minimum set of indicators to monitor group status ...••.. 19 Databases for generating basic information ............. 20 Classification of Expenditure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . 21 Expenditure classification by major interventions . . . . . . . . 22 Bi-monthly expenditure statement .•........•........ 23 Monthly committed expenditure .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Classification by location ...•.................... 24 Huruluwewa Watershed Nilwala Watershed Monitoring and Evaluation framework Format for Physical progress Reporting Format for summary quarterly report on physical progress Criteria for user sub-grants Selected indicators for Monitoring and Evaluation Logical Framework Organization Chart Monitoring & Evaluation Process - SCOR Project SHARED CONTROL OF NATURAL RESOURCES (SCOR) SCOR WORK PLAN FOR HURULUWEWA AND NILWALA WATERSHEDS (1993-1995) 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose This document presents the draft work plan of the 'Shared Control of Natural Resources (SCOR)' Project. It presents and describes the: rationale for selection of micro watersheds for SCOR interventions; the basis for selection of specific themes, intervention areas and activities; the approach for planning and implementation of project activities; draft work plans for Huruluwewa and Nilwala watersheds; research topics proposed to be conducted; and indicators suggested for M&E of the project impact. 1.2 SCOR Project The goal of SCOR is to increase the sustainable productivity of the natural resources base in Sri Lanka in ways that will improve people's livelihood beneficially and equitably now and in the future with due regard for the environment. To achieve this goal, the project seeks to increase the user's share of control of natural resources in selected watersheds through partnerships between the state and users that contribute to greater production while conserving the natural resources base. SCOR will promote integrated planning in the use of land and water resources. See annex 6 and 7 for Logical framework and organization chart. The Project is implemented in two phases over six years in the two pilot watersheds, Le., Huruluwewa (Upper yanoya) watershed in the North Central Province (NCP) and Upper Nilwala watershed in the Southern Province (SP), covering a total area about 30,000 ha. Maps showing the two watersheds are in map 1 and 2. 1.3 Approach for planning and implementation SCOR is the first project based on watershed principle ever to be implemented in Sri Lanka. It has been designed through intensive participatory interaction between resource users, provincial and field level officials, selected local consultants of relevant disciplines, facilitated by a design team from 11M!. The work plans presented herewith have been developed by the two resident SCOR teams, on the basis of the simulation planning exercises carried out during the planning workshops held between 23 September to 16 October, subsequent consultations with the people and the field level agency officials, and intensive field verifications. 1 SCOR activities are facilitated by lIMI through a multi-disciplinary team of professionals placed in the watershed. The team facilitates the planning and implementation of specific project activities by the resources users, relevant state agencies and NGOs in the selected geographic areas within the micro watersheds. It is under the direction of Water Resources Management Team (WRM1) established at field level and the Provincial Steering Committee (PSC) at provincial level. SCOR will follow a learning process approach in the planning and implementation of the project. The subsequent part of this note presents descriptions for Huruluwewa and Upper Nilwala watersheds, separately. 2. HURULUWEWA WATERSHED 2.1 Watershed area For purpose of SCOR, Huruluwewa watershed is defined as the area covered by the catchment of Huruluwewa tank up to Habarana wewa, water-spread area of Huruluwewa reservoir, and the area between Huruluwewa dam to the point of confluence of Adappan Oya with Yan Oya. The latter area includes the command area under Huruluwewa reservoir, highlands, and drainage area. The watershed consists of Yan Oya and Huruluwewa irrigation system and, a large number of minor tanks. It is actually the upper part of Yan Oya watershed. It falls within the Divisional Secretariat areas of Galenbindunuwewa, Palugaswewa, Kekirawa and Horowpatana. The total area covered is about 47,700 ha. The area covered by Huruluwewa watershed is shown in map 1. The important present land uses are chena, irrigated agriculture, forests, homestead and degraded areas. The main problems are lack of water in the Yala and weak management in Maha, degradation of the resource base and unorganized resource users. 2.2 Geographical areas of work A few tank cascade systems and micro-watersheds within the main Huruluwewa watershed have been identified for intervention in the initial two years. These specific areas have been initially identified by the Land Use Policy Planning Division (LUPPD) of the Ministry of Lands, on the basis of scientific studies undertaken by them in the watersheds. The main geographic areas identified for the implementation of SCOR activities in Huruluwewa are listed below: 1. Meegaswewa subwatershed 2. Mahadivulwewa subwatershed 2 3. Kiulekadawewa subwatershed 4. Drainage area of Huruluwewa irrigation system from Nikawewa upto Ilukwewa anicut. 5. Huruluwewa command area 6. Tract 6 area of Huruluwewa including homesteads. In addition to the above six areas, the Mahaweli feeder canal from Lenadora to Habaranawewa has been included as a special area of intervention by the SCOR. It should be noted that some interventions such as integrated planning and coordination will not be confined to any geographic area, but will spread over the entire watershed and the province. 2.3. Themes Cor interventions During the planning workshops held from 22nd to 18th October at Anuradhapura, at which the SCOR team and other relevant officers participated, nine main themes and intervention areas were identified. Those were subsequently refined on the basis of field reconnaissance and discussions with field level agency officials, community based organizations, NGOs and individual users. The final themes culminated at the above efforts are listed below. a. Stabilization of chena and encroached state lands. b. Regeneration of tank eco-systems. c. Integrated water management in Huruluwewa watershed. d. Sharing resources for improving homesteads. e. Ground water development and management. f. Land consolidation in minor tanks. g. Integrated planning and coordination. h. Organizing user groups/user organizations/sub-user councils for production, protection and related services. 1. Research with no interventions. 2.4 Rationale Cor selection oC themes a. Stabilization oC chena and encroached state lands: In the Huruluwewa watershed, chena cultivation on both government and private lands is very high. Several hundreds of encroached areas are being turned over to the people under various programmes. Forest lands in the watershed have already been degraded to an alarming level. The process of destruction of forest land will probably continue. Because of the rapid rate of 3 degradation of forests, drying up of water courses, dwindling of wildlife habitats and several other problems have already cropped up. The necessity to protect the existing forests and to increase reforestation of badly degraded lands have been stressed in several government policy documents. be Regeneration of tank eco-systems The eco-systems of all the minor tanks and the Huruluwewa reservoir have been degraded badly over time. It is generally accepted that the destruction of tank ec0­ systems contributes substantially to the siltation of tanks and development of alkalinity, and affects the tank inflows. Its restoration is vital both from production and protection perspectives. c. Integrated water management in Huruluwewa watershed Huruluwewa is a water deficit area. Huruluwewa tank is supplemented by the diversions from Mahaweli system via Huruluwewa feeder canal, and its command by a number of minor tanks. A number of agro-wells too have been constructed in the watershed. Thus, shallow ground water is now available to augment the surface water sources. However, a high degree of illicit water tapping is reported along the feeder canal from Mahaweli system to Huruluwewa tank. The efficiency of water use along the cascade of minor tanks en-route of Mahaweli water to Huruluwewa tank too is reported to be low. The augmentation of Huruluwewa system by the minor tanks situated in the periphery of the command too takes place without much planning and coordination. Drainage return flows from Huruluwewa irrigation system are tapped by the local people for cash crop production by lift irrigation. Utilization ofground water through agro-wells is carried out by farmers on individual basis. On the whole, there is no proper coordination between Mahaweli authorities, Agrarian Services Department, Provincial Irrigation Department, and the Irrigation department and individual users for the management of water for its optimum use. There is proven potential to improve the water use and management with the participation of the relevant agency officials and the users on a collective basis. d. Sharing resources for improving homesteads The capacity of the homesteads in generating food and employment has not been utilized satisfactorily. The homesteads should become the focus of integrated crop and livestock husbandry to facilitate continued income generation, food supply and employment. There has not been any programme focused on this important component of the farming system within this watershed. .. e. Ground water development and management A large number of agro-wells have been constructed in Huruluwewa watershed over the past few years by the government and individuals for irrigated agriculture. However, the ground water development through agro-well construction has been done without carrying out proper scientific studies. As a result, no accepted norms and regulations have been adopted for the construction of agro-wells. While accepting the fact that the ground water can be effectively used for crop production and to supplement surface water in Huruluwewa command, the haphazard development and use of ground water will be detrimental to the long term sustainability of irrigated agriculture as well as to the environment. Signs of deteriorating water quality, falling water tables, and declining water yields from existing wells are beginning to appear. Thus, a study focusing on the proper development and management of ground water is very timely. f. Land consolidation in minor tanks. Consolidation of small and fragmented lands particularly under the, minor irrigation systems is an important determinant of productivity in the dry zone. A few pilot interventions done in Sri Lanka provides evidence that consolidation of fragmented land holdings scattered over an irrigation command area of a minor tank, which are owned by a large number of farmers is practically possible with the willingness and participation of the land owners. In the present setting, land consolidation is crucial in improving efficiency of water use, productivity and total production. g. Organize groups for production, protection, marketing and related services: Increased production and improved protection require effective organizational mechanisms for sustainability. The lessons and experience in Sri Lanka and elsewhere adequately justify the need for organizing groups and linking the groups through proper coordinating arrangements such as organizations, committees and councils. Evidence from several pilot programmes conducted in the dry zone clearly shows that the basis for efficient use of resources has to come from organized groups. There is also high scope for providing services required for production and protection through organized groups. Strengthening the existing user groups and formation of new user groups, organizations and user councils will enhance the production, productivity, incomes, equity and sustainability of production and related markets and services. Organization of groups is therefore the key to success in production, protection, marketing and other services in the watershed. 5 h. Integrated planning and coordination It is noted that land and water resources management projects and activities are implemented by NGOs, CBOs and state agencies in the watershed. Planning of these interventions are done on an ad-hoc assessment of the resources base and resources potential, and analysis of production constraints. The role of resources users in planning is minimal. Also, specific projects and activities are implemented in isolation by various agencies and NGOs in their respective fields of specialization with little focus on the key problems affecting production, productivity and protection. More often the interventions and activities of projects come to a complete halt once the projects are withdrawn. Much potential exists to strengthen integrated planning and coordination within the Divisional Secretary's division and the Province. SCOR can facilitate the development of data and information base, monitoring and evaluation systems and training of officials, NGOs and resource users on constraint analysis, rapid appraisal of problems and situations, self monitoring and evaluation of programmes etc. At the end, it is required to transform from the present 'project' mode to •program me' in conceptualizing, planning, implementing, coordinating and evaluating specific development interventions in the watershed by line agencies, NGOs and resources users. 3. UPPER NILWALA WATERSHED 3.1 Watershed area The entire Nilwala watershed covers a total area of 146,280 ha. It comprises of the upper Nilwala watershed selected for initial interventions by SCOR, and the lower watershed, including the area falling under the Nilwala Ganaga Flood Protection and Drainage Scheme (NFPDS). SCOR will not have any interventions in the lower watershed, including the area covered by the NFPDS during the first phase. The area selected within the upper watersheds (micro watersheds) for SCOR interventions falls within the Divisional secretaries divisions of Kotapola, Pasgoda, Neluwa and Pitabeddra. However, SCOR activities during the fIrst phase will be mainly within the frrst three DS divisions. The main land and land use types within the upper watershed are protected forest, other state forests, highlands and homesteads covered with tea, paddy, rubber, coconut, kithul and fruit trees. Tea is the dominant agricultural crop. A significant area of the watershed is degraded. 6 3.2 Geographical area of work A few micro watersheds were initially identified by the Land Use Policy Planning Division (LUPPD) of the Ministry of Lands, on the basis of topography, ecology, land use, land tenure, production and marketing constraints, and the present status of environmental degradation, homesteads and resources users. A rapid appraisal of these micro watersheds was done by the SCOR team with the LUPPD team through field visits during the planning workshop. As a result, the following four micro watersheds have been selected for SCOR interventions and activities during the first phase. 1. Aninkanda 2. Diyadawa-Tenipita (Deniyaya) 3. Millewa 4. Horagala. In addition, the interventions in relation to integrated planning and coordination will not be confined to the above geographic areas, but will spread over the entire watershed and the province. (See map 2) 3.3 Themes for SCOR interventions Five themes have been identified by the SCOR team for Upper Nilwala watershed on the basis of the consensus arrived at the planning workshop and through subsequent field reconnaissance and discussions with field level agency officials, community based organizations (CBOs), NGOs and individual resource users. In addition, SCOR will carry out selected research studies without any interventions. The themes embrace the five basic SCOR concepts identified as production, protection, shared control, watershed approach and focus on poverty. They are stated below. 1. Sharing management of land and water resources. n. Sharing resources for improving homesteads. iii Improving tea/paddy culture. iv. Organizing groups for production, protection and related services. v. Integrated planning and coordination. VI. Research with no intervention 3.4 Rationale for selection of themes i. Sharing management of land and water resources: Distortion of river flows, as evident from increased flood peaks and reduced base flow distribution accompanied with severe erosion and loss of fertile soils, have become 7 characteristic phenomena in river Nilwala and other streams over few decades. There is consensus among the government officials, NGOs and the users of land and water resources that haphazard exploitation and use of lands including reserved forests, other state forests, large tea plantations and tea smallholdings, homesteads, river banks, stream and road reservations is largely responsible for this situation. It is noted that encroachment of state lands in forests, river banks, streaml road reservations for growing tea is common in the upper watershed. The remaining natural tropical forests too are subject to the threat of encroaching by people for the cultivation of tea. The gravity of the situation is evident from the fact that about 1500 acres of Diyadawa forest reserve had been encroached recently. The ignorance of farmers for the adoption of appropriate soil and moisture conservation in cultivated areas, particularly in encroached and private tea smallholdings, has aggravated the threat to land and water resources base. In the past, the government agencies and NGOs implemented a number of reforestation and afforestation projects to combat the threat to resource base. In addition, they enforced law and order against encroachers of state lands and destructors of forests through the governmental regulatory mechanisms. All these efforts are proved to be not very effective because of lack of collective concern of the community and participation and support from the local people for those efforts. Also, production-oriented, income generating protection and conservation strategies that provide incentives for encroachers and farmers have been notably absent in those efforts. As a result, it is noted that the degree of encroachment, forest destruction, soil erosion, loss of fertility and drying of water courses continue to take place at an alarming level. On the hand, there are complexities in tenure arrangements with regard to encroached lands. Some encroached lands have been given to the people, while others not. The formalities including land survey work in respect of some lands have not yet been finalized. The protection and conservation of lands alienated to people remain to be a serious problem. Time is, therefore, opportune to adopt an innovative approach to motivate and mobilize local people to protect the lands in upper watershed. The participation of the local people has to be obtained on collective basis, while the conservation efforts have to be rewarded through the introduction of conservation techniques and strategies that will generate fmancial gains and new land use and tenure arrangements that will guarantee the access and acquisition of the benefits of conservation by the people. 0. Sharing resources for improving homesteads: Homestead is a key mosaic of the upper watershed. Tea plants have replaced many traditional food crops in homesteads, particularly after the increased price for tea in early 1980s. Thus, tea plantation constitute a greater part of homesteads as well as the upper 8 watershed. Although, it is true that the people derive satisfactory incomes from homesteads, further economic benefits can be obtained by harnessing the full production potential of the homesteads. This production base can be intensified through the introduction of fruit crops, livestock husbandry, and other avenues such as apiculture, floriculture growing, horticultural plants and medicinal herbs, which will bring additional financial benefits-to the smallholder. However, in the past, no programmes have focused on integrated homestead development. SCOR could act the catalysing and facilitating role to the NGOs, private sector and the relevant line agencies to: promote new production and related value-adding opportunities in the homesteads; organize activity based user groups and organizations; and establish markets and other service links for primary and value-added products. ill. Improve Tea-paddy culture: The cross-section of the watershed can be typically characterized as tea-paddy culture, which is analogous to typical paddy-chena culture in the dry zone. However, it is reported that, except in privately managed tea plantations, tea and paddy yields in smallholdings are far below than the potential. Typically, many tea smallholder do not adopt proper agronomic practices and soil and moisture conservation measures. It is also noted that a prolonged period of dryness prevails during early months of the year, resulting in yield reduction of tea and substantial plant causalities due to soil-moisture stress. There is potential for minimizing yield reductions and losses by introducing proper agronomic practices and soil and moisture conservation measures to tea small holdings. SCOR can playa key role in facilitating this task. Testing the technical feasibility and economics of supplementary irrigation of tea is another possible area of intervention. Status of both irrigated and rain-fed paddy cultivation too is not very satisfactory. The best use of paddy lands and available water is greatly hindered by fragmentation of paddy allotments, poor condition of irrigation facilities due to neglected maintenance, and low preference to paddy cultivation by farmers due to high economic returns from tea growing. SCOR can intervene in motivating and mobilizing farmers through organized groups to rehabilitate and maintain irrigation facilities by sharing capital investments. The land productivity can be increased by consolidating fragmented lands of minor irrigation schemes. There is potential to integrate latter intervention with the on-going World Bank funded National Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (NJRP). iv. Organizing groups for production, protection and related services. Same as sub-section (g) of section 2 above. 9 t « a: v. Integrated planning and coordination. a: Same as sub-section (h) of section 2 above. a:: ct MODE OF IMPLEMENTATION c: A number of activities emanate from different interventions identified under the main e:: themes as described in the previous sections. The themes, intervention areas and activities proposed for Huruluwewa and Nilwala watershed are presented in work plans c given in sections 3 and 4 respectively. c: Those activities will spread out in geographic space at different locations depending on the production and protection needs demanded by specific ecological, socio-economic and environmental requirements at those locations. For example, for the proposed activities under the theme of 'regeneration of tank ecosystems', focus will be on the foreshore (Gasgommana), Perahana and Kattakaduwa, while for those under 'establishing chenas in tank catchments', the activities will be distributed in a larger area of the catchment of a cascade system. Also, the activities for the preservation and conservation of road, river and stream reservations will be carried out along the strips of selected reservations, thereby cutting across sub-locations in the sub-watershed. There are many sub-locations where such activities could be implemented. In view of the need to produce the expected output during the two year first phase of the SCOR project, an appropriate mode of implementation was articulated to have focus on two contiguous areas, one each in the two pilot watersheds. The selected contiguous areas are sub-watersheds of manageable size within the main watershed, having characteristic profiles of ecological, socio-economic and environmental features similar to that of the respective main watersheds. Action will be taken to demonstrate as much activities as appropriate representing different themes in one contiguous block. The full coverage of the land space of this sub-watershed will be attempted with the appropriate themes, interventions and activities as much as possible to fonn a model that will demonstrate the elements of replication in a much larger area during the second phase. This 'contiguous area' or 'model watershed' approach of implementation would illustrate the various production-protection elements along with their intimate relationships, that will have to be incorporated in watershed management in order to produce a sustainable land and water resources base. This mode of operation with a contiguous area focus will facilitate a convenient geographical base for monitoring of the land and water resources management processes and activities, and evaluating their outputs and effects leading to the anticipated impact. The two selected contiguous areas are Meegaswewa cascade in Huruluwewa watershed and Ihala Millawa Ela in Nilwala watershed. While concentrating almost all the themes 10 '. and many interventions and activities on these subwatersheds, other subwatersheds will also continue to have interventions and activities on priority basis and at different intensities. Figure 1 presents a sketch map of Meegaswewa cascade showing the two tanks, the catchment, paddy area and the homesteads, the terrain that slopes to Yan Oya. The emptiness depicts the need for conservation (protection) and production. Figure 2 depicts the future vision under the intervention of the SCOR project that aims to increase the sustainable productivity of these land and water resources. Figure la presents the typical landscape profile of Hurulewewa watershed 'With a cascade system of two tanks. Figure 2a portrays the possible future for this landscape with SCOR intervention. Figure 3 presents a profile of the landscape in the sub-watersheds identified for major focus in the Upper Nilwala Watershed. A brief account follows of the specific zones where intervention is considered necessary. ($ee Figure 4) 1. RBI tops and hi2h slopes more than 35 de2teeS These areas should be under the land cover category of dense forests with 50% 100% canopy cover. Most of these areas come under the control of the Forest department. Any encroachments will have to be removed with alternative solutions. 2. Secondary forests This zone has many degraded areas that need a production oriented intervention. Agro­ forestry practices with woody perennials and agricultural crops, tapping of available resources through user-state partnerships and conservation practices include the intervention. 3. Scrub and commercial croppin2 lands This zone offers opportunities for increasing the productivity of land, improve conservation, organize existing commercial activities and initiate new commercial activities through user sub-grants, conservation farming and other appropriate interventions. 11 A sketch of Meegaswewa Cascade SurfaceFig: 1 Conditions in Huruluwewa watershed for Meegaswewa Settlement f.1"~HA PADDY ~ Fig: 2 A Possible Future Planned Under SCOR Intervention CONSERVATION FARMING AVENUE PLANTING PADDY PERAHANA KATTAKADUWA .lla P r o te o te d " Il ln k J U p s tr e a J D (O a s g O J D J D a n a ) D e n s e T r e e C o v e r i n t h e F o r e s h o r e Fi g: 1 a Ty p le al La n ds ea p e Pr o fil e H ur ul uw ew a W at er sh ed Fi g: 2 a SC OR Pe rc ep tio n of a Po ss ib le Fu tu re .­ N (K a tt a k a d u 'W a ) A p p r o p r ia te ' T re e S p e o ie s f o r t h e S p a o e R e s e r v o ir \.... . tJ fl j ~ fp& dd Y T a d E n d /I Pa ~d y in 1) A g ro 'W e n . f o r C o n ju n o ti v e U s e o f ' W a te r ( P e r a h a n a ) G r o u n d C o v e r 'W it h F il te r in g E ff e o t Fig:3 A Typical Landscape Profile Calling for Intervention In Upper Nllwala Watershed Flg:4 AnUclpated Change In Landscape After SCOR Intervention rrrl§H7 Forest Cover .~r ,.-:... Agro Forestry Road Reservation ~---~-""I:.... 13 Home Gardens Stream Gard ens •• ~••• n.n. ~ ... I '. • G 4. Homesteads C The main focus in this zone is on achieving maximum production and conservation in the C homesteads allowing farm based as well as non-farm based activities. C 5. Road reservations C Road reservations offer a land space that need protection and production through C sustainable means. Many of such locations add to heavy erosion narrowing the right of way threatening the road itself. Avenue planting combined with plant/grass cover and C other plants of food/fodder value through user rights integrated with other activities such as animal husbandry are considered for intervention in this zone. C c:6. Stream reservations c Stream density is one of the criteria used in the selection of the sub-watersheds in the Nilwala Watershed. It is a known fact that streams with stripped banks of their c: vegetative cover carry loads of top soil eroding from the exposed land areas creating csiltation, flash floods and many other related problems in the downstream. c Field observations revealed the following existing conditions. c (1) Parts of the stream banks are eroding with sliding chunks of soils to the stream changing the morphology of the stream. c (2) Parts of the streams are under a crop by a user as an encroacher on his own or c:on an informal agreement with the owner/user of a larger land holding adjoining to the reservation. c (3) Parts of the reservations are cropped by the user of the holding adjoining the reservation. « The intervention in this zone is stream gardens based on the need and wide scope c identified for increasing protection with sustainable 'production of the land space of the cstream reservations in the micro-watersheds. Area for the stream gardens will be mapped and allocated among users who will have the motivation to protect the existing c trees and add new trees of productive value under the arrangement of usufruct rights to be granted to such users. Economic value of the current segment of the stream c reservation and the total economic value of the stream gardens established will be computed. • c Figure 4 presents a sketch of the same landscape apearing in figure 3, portraying the anticipated changes after carrying out the interventions described in the foregoing c sections. c c c14 .C c c SUB GRANTS The SCOR Project will disburse US $ 141,000 during the period of present co-operative agreement. There will be two types of such grants: (I) Sub-grants to individual users, user councils, People's companies, user organizations and user groups; and (II) Sub-grants to NGOs and Private Sector. The purpose and disbursement criteria of such grants are described below. I. Sub-Grants to Users Either the individual user or organized groups users will be eligible for SCOR project user grants. A vast majority of SCOR project grants, however, will go to organized user groups. The organized groups may include: user groups, user organizations, user councils/sub councils, people's companies aimed at production and protection etc. Such grants among other things will enable the group (or the individual) to: • Show collateral when seeking additional loans through private financial institutions; • Develop and promote insurance schemes for new crops, conservation schemes and investments; • Construct storage facilities, markets, terraces, nurseries or other small physical infrastructure; • Purchase equipment needed to initiate or upgrade joint enterprises to gain economies of scale and value added to their production. • Join with other user groups to establish revolving funds for conservation of investments and/or the purchase of agricultural inputs; and • Obtain legal, financial and other services associated with establishing user rights, small enterprises and productive ventures. With resources user groups that have sufficient financial and technical capability as well as solidarity, the project will assist experiments with production companies, outgrower systems or other models of production organizations that can achieve economies of scale and greater value-added from production, e.g., through processing to enhance house hold 15 incomes and reduce demands placed on vulnerable natural resources. Such a mechanism will also act as an incentive for users to protect natural resources. Criteria & Procedures for Disbursement of Grant Funds: The project's work plan for each of the two pilot watersheds has been prepared in consultation with the potential beneficiaries. Therefore the formation of new groups and/or strengthening of existing groups will be based on the activities included in the work plan. For example, there will be organized beneficiary groups for: "stream gardens" or agro-forestry or kitul processing etc. Such groups, with the assistance of IIMI-SCOR team and relevant agency officials will prepare detail activity plans. Ideally. such an activity plan will take the form of a feasible "mini-prmect" aimed of production and protection through shared control. The group will first conduct a self evaluation to check the feasibility and strength of such mini-projects and submit it to the respective user organization. After modifications (if necessary) and approval, the "mini-project" proposal will be submitted to the SCOR Project Team. After a participatory appraisal and depending on the magnitude of the "mini-project", the SCOR Team may submit the same to higher levels. As indicated below, the authorization process will depend on the magnitude of the grant component of the "mini-project": Fmancial limit Authorizing institution a. Up to Rs. 25,000 SCOR project team in consultation with relevant resource user group. b. Rs. 25,000-100,000 Watershed Resource management team. c. Rs. 100,000-500,000 Provincial Steering Committee or WRMT in consultation with the Provincial co-ordinator. d. Over Rs. 500,000 National Steering Committee or WRMT in consultation with the provincial and national co-ordinators. The proposed arrangement for 'c' and 'd' above include the relevant steering committee or the WRMT and the national! provincial co-ordinator. The co-ordinators are assigned with such authority because the PSC and NSC meetings are held once in three months and the work may suffer if the release of funds is delayed. As much as possible the project's user sub-grant allocation will be granted directly to the user organizations/councils. The eligibility will depend on the strength of the organization and on the strength of the activity plans/mini projects of: a) user organizations; and b) user groups of that organization. In short. the prmeet grants will only be given to strong mini-prmects forwarded by the strong organizations. Such organizations (or groups within organizations) will share the cost of the "mini-projects". 16 The SCOR PrQject team will encourage the concerned organization to use the grant funding establish a revolving fund for production and protection activities of the organization. Such a revolving fund will help the organization to: borrow from a lending institution such as a commercial bank. to provide matching grants in the form of a fixed deposit scheme in favour of user groups to enable them to raise a loan from a lending institution against this deposit etc. ll. Sub-Grants to NGOs & Private Sector The Project will work with selected private sector entItIes and NGOs which are committed to protecting and developing natural resources in cooperation with communities. Such NGOs will be engaged to help establish user groups in the pilot areas, to carry out training and establish economic linkages and services for groups, to undertake land/production consolidation work, to establish peoples companies, to undertake monitoring and evaluation with user groups and communities to raise environmental consciousness, and to integrate such considerations into production planning and implementation. By contracting with NGOs and private sector for such project related undertakings their skills and commitment for participatory natural resources management are expected to increase. The criteria and procedures for disbursement of funds will be much similar to those of user grants. Annex 4 presents the criteria used in providing user grants. ID. Proposed Disbursement Plan 1994 1995 Total Rs.M 1 2 3 4 1 2 4 User Grants 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 1.8 1.1 1.0 6.0 NGO/PS Grants 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.2 0.20 0.20 0.15 1.05 17 • • • .5. MONITORING AND EVALUATION The monitoring and evaluation system (M&ES) of the SCOR project has been designed to reflect the project performance in respect of its use of inputs, generation of planned output, expected effects and anticipated impact. Such reflection is expected to help steer the project towards its declared goals. The broad Monitoring and Evaluation framework is presented in annex 1. The M&ES is a part of the broad Management Information System (MIS) of the SCOR • project. The four major functions viz. data capture and entry, store and retrieve, ~ processing and analysis and display and report of SCOR MIS will facilitate the planning Cand implementation process of SCOR activities supported by a Geographic Information System (GIS). • SCOR M&ES is structured to collect information that would reflect and highlight any ~ differences between t (a) the targets, and the actual use of planned financial and physical resources inputs tIutilized to create the planned output, (b) the targets, and the actual direct outputs produced from those inputs, tI (c) the targets, and the expected effects that are observable in the short run as the outcome of the increased utilization of the produced output. •(d) Change of certain processes and physical properties that are directly relevant to the generation of promised outputs, permitting monitoring with such a frequency • to extract useful information for SCOR project interventions. • To accomplish the first task above, SCOR M&ES will use a financial monitoring system linked to its physical progress monitoring system. For the other tasks, the physical • progress monitoring system will generate information from the field level up-wards. See tI Annex 8. • Physical progress monitoring system ••The physical progress is related to the performance of the activities of the work plans. The physical progress monitoring will take place at three levels in the SCOR project as t follows. • (1) Field level by Resource user groups • t (2) Watershed level by SCOR Watershed Offices (3) National level by Colombo SCOR office 18 • • t First level of the activities is the group level which needs specific treatment in the SCOR project. For the generation of the promise outputs, it is the resource user group(RUG) that has to be identified, assisted to get organized and then strengthened. Thus the RUG forms the basic unit for action at the field level. Once identified and organized to undertake SCOR initiated activities, the RUGs themselves will start monitoring their own activities. Watershed teams will have arrangements to collect necessary items of this self monitoring information from the RUGs using a set of indicators that will reflect change/progress of the activities undertaken and the status of the group, at least once a month. The catalysts will make arrangements to help RUGs to organize this monitoring activity using resources from the groups. They will, together with other team members, verify the information periodically where necessary. This activity will provide a source of information for verifying the host country contribution by the farmers conservation measures as well and forms part of the SCOR watershed field level management information system(FMIS). Figure 5 A MINIMUM SET OF INDICATORS USED FOR DATA COLLECTION FROM THE RESOURCES USER GROUPS # of current members of the group # and quantity/extent of new production/protection activities undertaken during month/quarter ego length of contour bunds established length of organic bunds established length of reservations planted with trees etc. # of interactions had with Government officers on activities # of members received training # of meetings held # and amount of grants/credit received Group investments by type of activity Rates of survival of already undertaken activities Change of status of the group The group level monitoring will include periodic RUG self assessment as part of the SCOR participatory process primarily for them to know about the current group status to predict the immediate future of their efforts with their own abilities and constraints so that they can take corrective action in time. 19 At the second level of monitoring, watershed team will have arrangements to collect information on the implementation of their activities in the watershed. Monitoring at this level will be on the detailed activity plans prepared by the watershed teams. The work plans produce planned outputs against each activity indicated as an achievable target during a specific time frame not exceeding two years in the first phase. Based on these activities a set of indicators were developed identifying the unit of measure, instruments, method and the person responsible for data collection and measurement. A set of selected indicators appear on annex 5. Baseline data will be collected to facilitate ongoing and end of project evaluation. A framework for the collection of baseline data has been prepared. Their will be an ongoing evaluation at the end of the first year using selected number of indicators and an end of first phase evaluation that will help assess the trends set in the major area of intervention by the project. In order to receive, entry and store data at the watershed office 5 databases are created. At present 5 such databases are maintained as follows. Figure 6 DATA BASES FOR WATERSHED MANAGEMENT INFORMA nON SYSTEM Name of the database Number of data fields Purpose 1. Group database 2. Train database 3. Host database 4. Wmarket database 5. Grant database 66 69 16 To store data on resource user groups, their changing status and activities. To store data on training To store data on host country contribution To store data on prices at weekly markets To store data on user grants , c c c c c c c c c • c • • • • • • • 20 ••• 41 The watershed offices will report the physical progress of activities using data from their detailed activity plans and these data bases monthly. A quarterly report will be prepared by the SCOR Colombo Office and submitted to the National Steering Committee, lIMI Headquarters and USAID. The format of the report and its summery appears on annex 2 and 3. FINANCIAL MONITORING SYSTEM The financial Monitoring System (FMS) will categorize and aggregate all SCOR project expenditure into 10 items, and 12 major interventions. Two of those interventions are administration and research that are relevant to all the three cost centres viz. (1) Colombo Office (2) Huruluwewa watershed and (3) Nilwala watershed. The balance 9 interventions are relevant to activities carried out by the teams of the two· pilot watersheds. The 10 items of expenditure categories (general ledger classification) and the 12 major interventions appear on figure 7 and 8. Figure 7. CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENDITURE CATEGORY CODE 1. Staff Salaries International Local 2. Consultants. International Local 3. Travel and Per-diem International Local 4. Worlcshops and training International Local 5. Operation and maintenance of vehicles and office and research supplies and services 6. Information, education and communication material 7. Audit 8. Indirect cost/overheads 9. SUb-contracts/grants 10. Vehicles, equipment and commodities 21 Figure 8. CLASSIFICATION BY MAJOR INTERVENTIONS CATEGORY CODE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. Stabilization of chena and encroached state lands Regeneration of tank eco-system Integrated water management Sharing resources for improving homestead Ground water development and management Land consolidation in minor tanks Integrated planning and coordination Organization of user groups for production related services Shared management of Land and water resouces Improving tea paddy culture Research Administration The expenditure under the items 1 to 11 under major interventions will be further classified by location by micro watersheds within the two pilot watersheds. This information will be displayed using SCOR GIS (Geographic information system). As its output financial monitoring system will produce information on the use of fmancial inputs in respect of the above categories and present them in a bimonthly, monthly and quarterly reports to the SCOR Colombo core group, provincial and national steering committees, 11M! headquarters and USAID as required. The bi-monthly financial report will be an internal financial monitoring report presented to the Colombo core group for financial control compiled from the reports submitted by the two watersheds. 22 The format for the bi-monthly financial report appears on figure 9. The format for the flash report on committed expenditure by the watershed appears on figure 10. The GIS system will produce thematic maps for all the sub-watersheds showing relevant characteristics for analysis. These maps will be linked with a data base by a location code system that would facilitate the use of maps for showing monitoring results in their spatial dimension. Figure 11 lists the sub-locations by which information will be presented and displayed. Figure 9. BI-MONTHLY EXPENDITURE STATEMENT .......................WATERSHED REPORTING PERIOD FROM .............TO.......... . CODE DESCRIPTION OF EXPENDITURE AMOUNT Rs. 6666 1. House rent (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Offices 6639 2. Caretakers wages 6670 3. House repairs and maintenance 6745 4. Vehicle hire charges (a) (b) (c) (d) 6673 5. Vehicle repairs and maintenance 6743 6. Fuel Hired vehicles Motor cycles 6661 7. Driver overtime 8. Office operations 23 9. Guest house 6639 Caretakers salary & allowances 6670 Maintenance 6745 10. Staff travelling and subsistence 6747 11. Training 6624 12. Local consultancy fees 13. Salaries and Benefits 6749 14. Resources persons perdiem 15. Contingencies 2303 16. Equipment 6766 17. User sub-grants and sub-contracts Figure 10. MONTHLY COMMITTED EXPENDITURE BUDGET PER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH TOTAL DESCRIPTION MONTH Figure 11. CLASSIFICATION BY LOCATION LOCATION CODE HUBULUWEWA Meegaswewa sub-watershed Mahadivulwewa sub-watershed Kivulekadawewa sub-watershed Drainage area of Huruluwewa irrigation system up to Illukwewa anicut Huruluwewa command area Tract 6 of Huruluwewa command including homesteads Mahaweli feeder canal from Lenadora to Habarana ,UPPER-NILWALA Millewa Aninkanda Diyadawa-Tenipita Horagala 24 c c ( c c c c c e c c c c c: c c c c c: c: c c c: c c c 6. PROPOSED RESEARCH STUDIES UNDER SCOR 6.1 Water balance Inadequacy of water for agricultural production is the typical problem in the dry zone, particularly in Huruluwewa watershed. In Huruluwewa, the situation is further aggravated by the fact that a large quantity of water diverted from the Mahaweli network to the tank is tapped legally and illegally en-route of its feeder canal. As a result, the farmers are deprived of systematic cultivation of crops. It is likely that the tank supplies can be augmented with water diversions from elsewhere, as well as with shallow ground water supply. The ground water potential and its recharge-depletion relationships will be assessed by the ground water management component of the work plan. Thus, a surface water balance study of the Huruluwewa watershed will be required initially to assess the water supply potential and present demand with a view to understanding how best the available water resources can be utilized for improved agricultural production. 6.2 Integrated watershed water management Water is the limiting factor inhibiting agricultural production in the dry zone. However, the water scarcity has become acute due to the absence of an integrated approach for development and management of the available water resources within a watershed unit. It is believed that the productivity of the available water can be greatly enhanced by managing the available water resources, both surface and ground water, in an integrated manner. In the Huruluwewa watershed, Huruluwewa tank is hydrologically interlinked with a number of minor tanks. At the same time, there are a large number of agro-wells present. A research study is proposed to evaluate the available surface water resources in the watershed, including that of Huruluwewa and minor tanks as well as the ground water and to study various options for sharing surface and ground water to maximize agricultural production within the watershed. The study will make land use recommendations for the watershed, develop a computer operated model(s) which can simulate different scenarios of water availability in different locations of the watershed, water demand for alternative cropping patterns, and different options for allocating the available water for agricultural production. 6.3 Rio-diversity Huruluwewa is a dry zone area with an extreme water shortage during the a greater part of the year. Since the main form of agriculture is chena farming, the remaining vegetation is burnt just before the rains. The practice of burning deteriorates almost all 25 the living plants and animals and hence a threat on bio-diversity. However, there are pockets of vegetation which occupy reserved areas where the natural vegetation is not subject to degradation. It is proposed to conduct a research study to determine the bio­ diversity of the eco-system and characterize the usefulness of various vegetation types with a view to improve and sustain it in the long run. Being in the wet zone, the bio-diversity of the Nilwala watershed is expected to be very high. It is proposed to undertake the same research study in the Nilwala watershed too. 6.4 Desiltation of minor tanks There are about 200 minor tanks situated within the Huruluwewa watershed. Typical to many minor tanks of the country, almost all of these tanks are heavily silted up. The siltation has reduced the effective storage capacity of the tanks. The reduced capacity of a tank results in quick flooding of downstream areas and reduction of serviceable command area of it. As a matter of policy, desiltation of minor tanks is not formally undertaken by the national irrigation agencies. The policy is driven by the common belief that desiltation of tanks would result in very low economic returns. The cost-benefit studies undertaken so far indicates poor returns when the benefits are evaluated considering only the increased agricultural production potential attributable to additional tank storage created by the volume of silt removed. However, it is required to re-examine this policy on the basis of a detailed research study , which consider a wider spectrum of feasible technological options and diverse technical, social, economic and environmental benefits attributable to minor tank desiltation in the dry zone. ~ t6.5 Endemism C The endemic flora and fauna found in the two watersheds have not been identified yet. How many of the endemic species are endangered is also not known. Endemic and C endangered species need to be identified for protection and other research work. This Cshould be given high priority since the endangered species in a drier area are highly vulnerable for extinction. It is proposed to undertake a research study, on priority basis, C to identify endemic and endangered species of fauna and flora which exist in the two watersheds and causes for the disappearance of the species. The first step of the study c: will be to identify, classify and prepare a checklist of all flora and fauna species found. The study will also identify, as much as available in the watershed. 26 possible, all herbal and medicinal plants C C C C C C C ... 6.6 Economics of ground water irrigation The use of ground water has emerged both as an alternative and a supplementary source of irrigation in the dry zone. The groundwater extraction through agro-wells is increasingly becoming very popular in many water scarce areas of the country, including the Huruluwewa watershed. Few studies so far conducted in relation to the groundwater use for agriculture indicate substantial improvements in production, profits and nutritional levels. However, there are indications of adverse environmental effects attributable to over extraction of groundwater through agro-wells. It is, therefore, suggested to evaluate the true benefits of groundwater use using economic analysis. 6.7 Feasibility and economics of micro irrigation Cultivation of high value crops under irrigated conditions in homesteads and upper command areas is one of the strategies for improving the income of rural people. This can be done with the use of micro-irrigation technologies such as drip and sprinkler irrigation with the use of locally manufactured low-cost water pumps. However, our knowledge and understanding on the technical feasibility and economic, viability of those technologies are very limited. In Huruluwewa watershed, where surface water is typically scarce, shallow ground water may be used with combination of pump and sprinkler or drip irrigation techniques to irrigate highlands. In the Nilwala watershed too this option can be tested. In addition, it is found that tea, which is the main crop, undergo severe moisture stress during February - March every year, resulting in plant causalities and yield reduction. It would be possible to provide supplementary irrigation to tea plants, using micro-sprinkler irrigation together with ram-pump technology. However, the technical feasibility and economic viability of these intervention need to be tested through an applied research study. 6.8 Eco-tourism The potential for expansion of eco-tourism in the Huruluwewa watershed has not been examined in the past. The Ritigala in the adjoining watershed is full of monuments with archaeological importance. The flora and land scape there might attract many a tourists having scientific interests. The Kiulekada tank within Huruluwewa watershed is another attractive location where various types of birds are found even in the dry season. The tank is deep with a large dead storage and hence bird and animal'life is very active. The tank is surrounded by forest on many sides. Before promotion of eco-tourism in the area, it is necessary to identify the potential sites and the nature of attractions for the tourists. 27 Also, the potential for expansion of eco-tourism within the Nilwala watershed has not been examined. Such expansion will result in sharing the resource which has a limited use at present as a place of eco-tourist attraction. This study will identify areas suitable for eco-tourism and thereby to develop a program to tap this potential. 6.9 Vegetation change and rainfall The impact of vegetation on river flows and regimes has been well documented. Whether the rainfall is influenced by the local vegetation is an area which is not known yet. Evidence from elsewhere shows that the local rainfall can be influenced by the local vegetation type and the extent. The evidence is reported in respect of dry areas. The study on the effects of vegetation change on rainfall are also important for the SCOR which is planning to convert cleared areas into vegetation cover. Huruluwewa itself is considered a water deficit system. Therefore, if there is any effect on re-vegetation on local rainfall, it will be beneficial to the watershed. Re-vegetation takes time and it takes still more time to ascertain any effects of vegetation change on the rainfall. Therefore, this study may take several years. It will be conducted in both watersheds. 6.10 Social conflicts and strategies for resolution There are various types of conflicts associated with land, water, forest and in the use of other resources. The conflicts between parties prevent the cultivation of land and planting and management of trees. In the watershed, several lots are not cultivated due to conflicts and hence are left abandoned even when water is available for a crop. Conflicts associated with highland areas are another serious problem. In several instances, conflicts lead to quarrel and even may take the valuable human life. A great deal of farmers' and other resources may have to be spent in resolving these conflicts. The impact of social conflicts on the management of land and water resources has not been assessed in the watershed. Such an assessment would be the starting point for the development of an institutional mechanism to resolve them. In this regard, the indigenous conflict resolving mechanism should be highlighted. This study will examine the type and nature of conflicts and their effects on the sustainable management of land and water resources. Their effects on production and protection will also be examined. Then the type of interventions that will be required to resolve the conflicts will also be studied. The study will be undertaken in both watersheds. 28 6.11 Agri-business Like any other rural area, Huruluwewa watershed offers a large number of natural resources which are not utilized fully at present. This is true for the Nilwala watershed too. Many resources such as naturally grown (and no contamination) fruits are wasted due to lack of opportunities for processing and marketing. Meanwhile, lack of employment, and poor income among the rural people are rampant. Thus, there exists a great potential for promoting business opportunities within agricultural sector for income and employment generation. Development ofagri-business opportunities may also go hand-in-hand with the development of local industries. It is, therefore, proposed a research study be undertaken to: identify potential agri-business opportunities; assess resource requirements; evaluate their income generating potential etc. 6.12 Indigenous knowledge and practices Huruluwewa watershed has a very long history dating back to the pre-christian era. Evidence suggests that over this long period of history, a wealth of indigenous knowledge and a vast number of practices have been adopted in accomplishing, tasks related to irrigated farming, rainfed farming (chena), pests and disease control, soil fertility enrichment, crop-livestock integration, water conservation, forestry, health, food processing, etc. In addition, there had been a host of local institutions and their relations which ensured the proper functioning of the tasks mentioned above. Over the years, a majority of indigenous practices and a greater part of the knowledge have been disappeared. The proposed research study will aim at consolidating the available indigenous knowledge and practices. This study will identify the type of knowledge and practices and attempt to document the wealth of such knowledge relating to agriculture including crop/stock health, irrigation, forestry and conflict resolution mechanisms. A long-term research interest will be to adopt the indigenous knowledge and practices to examine whether they can be adopted with profits under present day farming conditions. 6.13 Improving the agricultural potential in lower Nilwala watershed Heavy flooding had been a serious problem in the lower Nilwala watershed in the past. The government implemented a flood protection and control project, called Nilwala Ganga Flood protection and Drainage Scheme (NGFP&DS), to mitigate the threat of floods in the recent past. Although, the NGFPD&S has reduced the threat from floods in the Lower Nilwala Watershed, it is reported that a set of adverse environmental problems have cropped up due to excess drainage. Development of acidity, alkalinity and iron toxicity in the Lower Watershed, particularly in Kiralakale irrigation and 29 c drainage scheme, are a few of those problems that affect agricultural production and productivity. • .: While proper surface drainage is a pre-requisite for agricultural production, it is also required at the same time to prevent excess drainage in previously waterlogged areas to c control the development of acidity and toxicity. This means ground water table in the carea has to be maintained within a specific range of levels. The proposed study would evaluate the parameters for ground water table management and develop guidelines for I .operating the drainage system for optimum agricultural production in the area. I 6.14 Improving Agricultural Potential in Coastal Low-lying areas C CMost of the agricultural lands along the coastal areas, particularly in the Southern Province, are typically low-lying. Thus the agricultural potential of those lands is I limited. Such water-logged areas in many parts of the world are successfully cultivated with high value crops using ground water drainage techniques. However, such t technology is not used in Sri Lanka. :II S It would be useful to explore the possibility of applying ground water drainage techniques to effect sub-soil drainage for improving agricultural potential of water-logged low-lying ~ alluvial lands of the country. A research study is proposed to evaluate the hydraulic parameters required for ground water drainage design, and economies of various ground water drainage technological options. This study will be complementary to the research study proposed under item 14 above. ~ 6.1S Conjunctive Use of Tank and Well Water C Use of tank water in conjunction of well water in irrigated command is one of the strategies to improve productivity and cropping intensity of many minor and major tanks. c.: Although there has been increasing recognition of the viability of the conjunctive use Cmode, it has hardly been implemented on a scientific basis. An applied research study is proposed to evaluate the behavior of water flow from irrigation canals to agro-wells; C ways and means of accelerating or decelerating water seepage; response of ground water table to rainfall, seepage, evapotranspiration, ground water obstruction; different C modes of system operation for conjunctive use; and related social, economic and Cinstitutional issues. C 6.16 Planning for Conjunctive Use in Irrigation Rehabilitation C This is also a study complementary to research proposal No. (16) above. The idea is to C develop a design methodology and a guideline for rehabilitating an irrigation scheme for C C30 C C C conjunctive use of tank and well water, so that the methodology and guideline could be adopted by the irrigation agencies for irrigation rehabilitation planning and design. The methodology and guideline could be developed on the basis of lessons and experiences from an actual task of planning, designing and rehabilitating one or two irrigation tanks to facilitate conjunctive use after rehabilitation. The procedure would involve field monitoring of some parameters such as rainfall, recharge from rainfall and irrigation water, ground water potential and available yield, design well density, optimum service area under an agro-well etc. The guidelines could be even further updated on the basis of the experiences of operating the scheme for conjunctive use after rehabilitation. 6.17 Evaluation of Alternative Irrigation Rehabilitation and Modernization Strategies: Huge investments are being made for rehabilitation and modernization of irrigation projects. However, there is apparently no policy for selecting technological options in the rehabilitation and modernization of irrigation projects. A study is proposed to evaluate and compare the cost-effectiveness, performance and ,productivity of various technological options and different combinations of each of the options ~uch as automatic water contr91 devices; conjunctive use; canal lining. This can be conducted as an applied research in a few minor tanks selected for rehabilitation under the on-going National Irrigation Rehabilitation Project (NlRP). 6.18 Reservoir Sedimentation Studies Reduction of reservoir sedimentation is one of the major effects of watershed management. However, the data on the degree of siltation of major and minor tanks of the country are not available. On the other hand, the data on the relationships between land use, soil erosion, sediment transportation and reservoir sedimentation are not known. A research study is proposed to study the siltation of a few selected major and minor tanks with a view to establish national data on; tank siltation rates; river flow and sediment discharge relationships, effects of land use on soil erosion and reservoir silting; and problem of distribution of sediments within the tank beds. The study would be aimed at developing a methodology for monitoring sediment flows in rivers and sedimentation rate in the tanks and developing indicators for sediment flow. 6.19 Eenvironmental Impacts of Irrigation Although, there is mounting evidence of adverse environmental effects of poor irrigation practices, the scale of the problems are not known to any degree of accuracy. For instance, the extent of irrigated land that has become unproductive due to salinity development or loss of fertility or reduction of the effective storage capacity of tanks are 31 not adequately known. A study covering several selected irrigation schemes to assess the nature and scale of environmental problems is proposed with a view to establish the baseline status with respect to major environmental problems associated with irrigation. 6.20 Economics or Land and Water Conservation Measures. It is well accepted that land and water conservation brings substantial returns in the long run. It is also accepted that land and water conservation not only improve in-situ land fertility and productivity, but also generate substantial benefits to the users of land and water downstream of the watershed. However, the benefits and returns of land and water conservation are only qualitatively known, but not quantitatively. Availability of quantitative data base on costs and short-term and long-term benefits of land and water conservation is essential for a country like Sri Lanka for policy planning, policy formulation and policy implementation in relation to land and water subsectors, both at the centre and the province. Such a data base will also be useful for the users of land and water resources to select and adopt various options for conservation. Applied research will be undertakea to evaluate the economics of conservation. ~ " ~ C ~ ~ C ~ ..- ~ •" ~ AI ... ~ ~ ~ 32 ~ e c ~ REFERENCE M:ETRIX FOR WJJOR SCOR OUTPUTS AND WORKPLAN ACTIVITIES \VORI:FLAN - HURULu\VE\VA \VATERSHED OUTPur ourpUT A.S PER TECHNICAL REPORT \VORKP~_ II NO ACTIVITY N~I lal la2 la3 I b I lb2 lb3 ldl leI lfl 19l lhl 2bl 2b2 2cl 3al 3bl 3b2 3b3 3cl 3dl 4al 4bl 4dl 4el Fo:r::.m;; eX22.I:ding aI:.~ £trengthening Resource user groups User organizations Sub-User councils Trainin;; representatives of user groups user organizations user sub-councils Small grants to user groups to invest in common group assests New commercial opportunities for user groups Production companies linked to new markets Rural based commercial activities with matching grants User organizations conferred with legal status and power Land leases/usufruct processes leading to production companies Commercial activities Demonstration of benefits of jioint management in small tanks Minimum of 3000 ha under joint management Improved systems of resource use and user operations monitoring Officers trained in local level planning group formation and support at nationalIevel at provincial level at divisional level Training on participatory natural resource management to NGOs and private sector organizations NGOs and private sector organizations providing technical managerial and commercial information to user groups Improved methods developed for multi-level planning and coordination in pilot watershheds Groups/organizations support and promote planning and coordination in pilot watersheds Improved land and water resources information and monitoring system designed Institutional mechanism to coordinate and support land and water management practices made operational at provincial and national levels 8 8,3a 8 la2, 2£2,22.3, 2a4 la2 2c,4c 4f,4g 8 4a,4b,4c,4d,4e 3a,3c 8 3c Ie lb, lc, 2b~ 2d,3c, 3d,4e 5 lal lal lal la2 la2 7 7 3bl 7 Note: The activities of the work plan are ordered according to the major interventions. The above metrix links activities to the SCOR promised outputs appearing on pages 21 - 24 of the technical report. 33 S C O R P R O J E C T - H U R U L U W E W A W O R K P L A N (N O V E M B E R 1 99 3 T O S E P T E M B E R 1 99 5) A O E N C Y 1 99 .5 1 9 9 . 19 94 '9 .5 L O C A T IO N O U T P U T 1"3 11 ". W .. u O R IN T B R V B N T lO N Y A L A M A li A R E S P O N S IB L E Y A L A M A li A (1 ) S T A B IL IS A n O N O P C iE N A A N D E N C R O A C H E D S I' A T E L A N D S , (a ) C on ll er va li on f ar m in , A w ar en eu P ro S ra m m e 25 D O A .D A S .P D 50 25 2.5 K .JC , M .W •• D .W . E .W 10 0 O m u n -1 2 5 T ra in ln , O f o m u n / 50 0 15 0 25 0 P ar m en 1 00 0 U ll en S C O R T ea m . D S 07 03 05 - T /6 . M O W . M R W . SO 01 1.5 D em O il ra li on i C O nl u! U nt a IM D , E D 01 02 M D . M W . E H . H S I o. - W o ru h o p e 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 S IL N . C A S ch oo l P ro sr am m e8 P ar m en 1 00 0 V ia ita l P ie ld D a, . A w ar en e. . cr ea le d D m on , ac ho ol c hi ld re n A ll S ch oo b In I he W al en b ed 30 0 ha . O oA . O S. D O A . IM D . P D , 11 50 h a 50 0 ha . 50 h a. 20 H a. f ro m e ac h U lle r (b ) S li b il iu ti o n o ( ch en .. P L C . S C O R . N O O O O ro up e (2 00 0 ha .) (c ) C on llC rv al io n ol C ha nn el l, R oe da , S lr ea m . an d T an k B lln da . O .A .i D .I M D .P D . S C O R . 04 k m lH m O H m 01 U n P ar t or L B a nd R B - H ur ul uw ew a an d P ee d er C ha nn al 3O k. m C ha nn el l N O O O . U S E R O R O U P S S om e d ia la n u w hh in I he W al en h ea d 1. 5k .m R o u ll O A . O S. P S. U S E R O R O U P S 01 U n 12 k m 02 k m 01 U n - O A . O S. U S E R O R O U P S ,S C O R . 05 k m 1 4 K m S om e D ia la n u o ( Y an 0 )' 1 - 25 k .m . S lr ea m l iD .P D .I M D H ur ul uw ew a. M ah ad iv ul w ew a an d .o m e .m al l T an b I n co m m an d A re a 0.5 k .m TD D k B un dl ID .D A S . O S. U S E R O R O U P S 05 K m - - - N O O O (2 ) R E O E N E R A T E T A N K E C O -S Y S T E M (a ) A w ar en e . . P ro ,r am m e C S .O A . A C L O . O S. U S E R I I I 01 K iu le b d aw ew l H ur ul uw ew a 1 D em on ll ra li on D em on ll ra li on E ll ab li ah ed o R O U P .P O O .D A S .P D .D I 15 L C , D O A .l R D P .D E .P H N O O O 1.5 M . h ad iv ul w ew D P ar m en 10 00 o m u n 30 T ra in in , (O m u n lU .e n ) 80 0 20 0 M ee ,. w ew a H ir iw ad un na W ew ti T ba lk o! e W ew a M ah a R am ba w a W ew l 7 6 .5 S ch oo b S ch oo b - 22 S ch oo l P ro sr am m e 12 00 10 00 85 0 70 0• S lu de nl i S lu de nt a - 37 .5 0 10 0 10 0 30 0 P .r m en 5 00 V ia i' " P ie ld D a, . H ur ul uw ew a 20 0 h C al ch m en ta 32 0 ha (b ) C on .e rv ll io n of c he n .. In K iu le b d aw ew a 25 h a M ah ad iv ul w ew a 2 H a M ee ,. w ew a 2 H a H ir iw ad un na W ew a 2 H a T ba lk ol e W ew a 30 h a M lh l R im b ew lw ew l ; ~ http:OmunlU.en http:DOA.lRDP.DE.PH http:POO.DAS.PD http:O.A.iD.IMD.PD http:DOA.DAS.PD P lJ le - 2 M A JO R I N T E R V E N T IO N (e ) E at ab li lh m ea l 0 1 N lU la ri e. (d ) R al o ra d o o o f G u ,o m m aa a P er ah aa a !C .a ua U cl llw a O U T P U T N W 'II ri e. u la bl il il ed II I ea el llo ca tiO ll& ( T ot al 3S N lU la ri e, ) 30 h a L O C A T IO N lo le e, _w ew a M ah ad iv ul w ew a Ec .o ') 'I te m II I - 02 T u b 1 9 U /l tI l4 V A l{ A 15 02 I t' 4 Y A L A 20 OS 1I I'4 /1 1S V A H A 15 11 19 5 V A J. A 08 A O E N C Y lt R S P O N S [B I. R (3 ) IN T E G R A T E D W A T E R M A N A G E M E N T (a ) P or m at io a 01 P ar m er O r, aa ila tiO ll& { ro m L ea ad or a 10 1 I1 ilt w ew a ua de r -A a e w :y (b ) P ee de r C ha aa el la el U 5i oa o r H ur ll lu w ew a O ff ic ia a ia M ah aw el i W al er P an ae l P ro p er O pe ra ti oo a ad M al ll le aa ac e o ll h e C ha al le l C oo rd il la ti oo a m o o , P .O O . ill & he S )'I te m E al ab li th m ea l o r ap pr op ri at e "o p p ia l ') 'I te m l. (e ) C om m aa d A re a C ro p di ve ni fl C al io o d u ri n , M ah a aa d Y al a S U ea ,l il en ia , 0 1 eU II Il , o r, a a iu ti o u IM D - 23 D A S - 26 N ew o r, aa iu ti O ll & - 10 R el ea te 0 1 ru n qu ol a aH li re d (1 50 e llM C t) (a > H aa da ve r & he l ul l ') 'I le m 1 0 1 0 1 H uc ul uw aw e (E .x I:e pl l al S m il u ) (b ) T u m O ve r & he C ha aa el S )'I le m 1 0 P ar m er O rl a a i­ ,a ti oo a ad M ai ll la ia & he C ha na el il l c or re ci pr of il e. SI iP pl y 01 !I O e II M C t 1 0 H ur ul uw ew a _ u re d A pp ro pr ia te " o p p ia , ') 'I te m , I II OS h a _I ab li li le d Y al a - 15 00 h a M ah a - 10 00 h a (1 ) L ea ad or a 10 S li ir iy a (2 ) S i, ir iy a. T al to le . H ir iw ad llw a M ir iw ad ua aa w ew a .. H ab ar aa a T a a t (3 )P ro m H ab ar aa a 10 R eM rv oi r (4 )l I. ea er vo ir lo lll l& w cw a L ea ad or a 10 S i, ir iy a T a a t L ea ad or a 10 H u ru lu w ew a T a a t L en ad or a 10 H ur ul uw ew a T aa k H ur ul uw ew a. K .lu le ka da . M ah ad iv ul w ew a. M ah a - R am be w a. M ee ,_ w ew a 06 06 3 10 0'. 11 0 7S '.II o 10 00 17 20 7 25 '.1 10 SO '.llo 15 00 10 0'. 11 0 SO '.llo 10 00 15 00 C S -N C P .C P . D A S (C P ). IM D .S C O R JD .N C P . C P S C O R .I M D .C S ,M E A S C O R .I M D .I D ,P O .W E A S C O R .I M D .I D ,P O ,P M C S C O R .D O A ,D A s. D S JM D .I D D 5, D O A ,D A s, ID ,A D A ,P O . IM D ,S C O R C oo ld "M • • v ~ A O E N C Y 19 95 ~~ ~~ ~~ MA U A 1 9 9 . 19 94 /9 5 L O C A T IO N O U T P U T M A JO K IN T R K V E N T IO N 1 "3 1 1 9 9 ' R E S P O N S IB L E V il -l ar m w at er M an ag em el ll Y A L A Y A L A M A li A D S .I D JM D .s eO R .P O , D O A . W at er ( A gr o- w ei ll .) E ff ic ie ll tl lU o fL ri aa ti O ll C O llj uc tiv e II U t es te d ill C on ju ru :t iv e U se o f D A S W at er . tr ac l6 C O lll lll en ce Y al a be fo re m id A pr il ( N ew y ea r) a nd M ah a w il h fK '1 r a i. co m m en ci nl f ro m O cl ob er on w ar ds . T im el y C ul ti va ti on A r ep or t Ir n la li o n S ch ea du li nl S C O K .I M D .1 D ,P O ly 'l cl 4 25 % 75 % Id en ti fy .t r ec ti fy O .t M O pe ra li on a nd m ai nl en an ce o f th e pr ob le m , i n tr ac l 6 Ih ro u lh II U p ar ti ci pa ti on . E ff ic ie nt S ys te m M an al em en t 1M D .I D . D A S ,D S ,C S ac ti v it i. o f' m a ll ta n b 10 % K an ni m ad u w a. I ha Ja la m ew ew a. O n e, u b -c o u D ci lf o rm ed C oo rd in at io n w it h th e D ut uw ew a, O at al aw a, K ok aw ew a, w it hi ll th e H ur ul uw ew a S ch em e in cl ud in l r ep r. en ta li v e. o f, m a ll la n b in P al u lo ll al am a, H ur ul uw ew a. M ar ad an ka da ll aw ew a, J ay an th iw ew a, I1 ub bo da ya la m aw ew a an d I1 ac hc ha nk ul am a. (d ) D ra in al e A n a O S .D S ,S C O K , D O A . D A S , W al er o f H ur ul uw ew a 90 IS O P ro m N ik aw ew a A ni cu t 10 ll ul tw ew a 60 D ra in aa e w at er u til iz .a tio n U ti li sa ti on o f d ra in al e 1 M D .t L C D A ni cu t im pr ov ed i n 30 0 ha . 90 15 0 60 O n -f ar m W at er M an al em en t E st ab li sh m en t o f a pp ro pr ia te C ro p p in l pa tt er na cr o p p in l ' y sl em l 15 0 90 in lr od uc ed in 3 00 h a o£ - d ra in al e ar ea (4 ) S H A R IN O K E S O U R C E S P O R IM P K O V IN O H O M E S T E A D S C O R , D O A .I M D .P D pl an t n u ru rl eJ 02 01 (a ) E lL ab la h Ih re e C o m m er ce li u d P ro du ct io n oC re qu ir ed T w o n u ru ri e. in H ur ul uw ew a. co m m an d ar ea a nd o ne i n fe ed er 3 n u n a n e ' ,e ed li n " al lu re d ch an ne l (P ru ll i. P o re 'l i an d O li d ad ia S ee d li n p ) D S. s e O R . D O A .1 M D ~2 - m o d el H O ll le ,t ea ds 4 20 28 m od el H o m .t e a lk K K .N W ,O W ,E W .T I6 . M D W . M R W .S P . 4 (b ) E st ab la h M o d el H o m .t ea lk M D , M W , E -H , H -S 1 , S 2 -L M . C A ro m e ac h lo ca liO ll) 11 2 ad di ti on al h om e, le ad s 16 80 sp re ad e ff ec li 16 (c ) E xp al lJ lio n oC H o m es te ad d ue t o el ll er ge d u m o d e. 25 0 ho us e ho ld s be ne fi tt ed (d ) L iv es to ck Im pr ov em en t o f M il k P ro du ct io n S C O R , D M H , D S , N E ST I. .E H ea ds - 50 0 50 0 he ad s o fc al li e 12 $ 25 0 K K .N W ,O W ,E W ,T /6 , M D W , M K W .S P . 50 15 25 0 ho us eh ol ds b en ef il te d S C O R , D M H , D S , N E ST I. .E E sl .il bl is h m ar ke l lin l;s 2 p ro u ll in l un il i 15 0 37 5 15 0 K K .N W ,O W ,E W ,T /6 . M D W . M R W ,S P . 32 $ P ro ce aa in l o f m il k an d 25 0 C ar m C am m . be ne fi ll ed L li L li L li L li se O R . D M H , D S , N E ST I. .E 1 ~ J a r m f am il ie . 15 0 he ad s o f IG aI i 75 75 H ur ul uw ew a C om m an d ar ea P ro m ot io n oC 1 0A 1 re ar in l - http:DOA.IMD.PD http:DS.IDJMD.seOR.PO _ _ ·- ­ ,,, . , A O B N C Y ",. ,,, :1 JU /" '. L O C A T IO N O U T P U T M A JO R . IN T B R .V B N n O N R B S P O N S IB L B S C O R .D O A .F D Y A L A V A H A M A R A "" Y A L A 75 M ee li ci aa l h er bs :zo o 25 In lr oc lu ct io n o f 3 00 K K . C A .M D .M R W (e ) P ro m ou O ll o f a pi cu hu re a ae l be e co lo ni ea M ee lic ill al h er ba - S ha . A D D O A . S C O R . D S ,I M D to OS tO O v il la p l C A .M D .S D .K K 2 v il la p ' ( tO O h a) (f ) E al ab li ll un el ll o f F ru il tO O S C O R . D O A . D R D . D S1 . tO O M P I. ID B SO in c re _ in co m e fo r K K .N W . G W .E W . T '6 .M D W . M R W . (, ) P ro m ot iO ll o f A lr o -b aM ei C A 2S 0 fa rm f am il ia in e lu w a (S ) G R O U N D W A T E R D E V E L O P M E N T A N D M A N A G E M E N T R eM ar ch f in el in ,1 w ill b e ou l a _ le e a lle l F u ci er C an al ,H W c at ch m el ll , c om m al le l G ro un el W al er P 'l' C ll li al (a ) R eM a rc h 01 1 ,r ou ne l w al er be fo re A u ,U I 'N a ad re co m m el le la uO ll 0 11 H i, hl aa el a ne l D ra il la . re co m m en el au O ll l w ill b e ,r o u ll d w al er U H m ae le . S C O R A I IM I A N D 1 D A r ep or t S C O R . A D A . L C ,D S ,I D Im pl em ei ll ed fr om M ah a !l4 I9 S, B ef or e co m m el lC il ll o f V al a 9 . el ta bl ah ed F ee ci er C an al .H W c al C hm en l, co m m al le i M O il it or il l, S )'I le m (b ) M O II ilo ril l& H i, h la n d a nd D ra il la . A r ep or t S C O R .I M D .I D . B A N K S , A D A F u ci er C an al H W c at ch m en t, c om m an d 6 S " to " S U H r , r o u ~ p ro vi di na (c ) P ro vi dl n, D eC eu ar y M M ee I 2 5 " H i, h la ad a nd D ra il la . M M ee . Ii lr ou ,h U H r , r o u ~ S C O R . D A S , D S . S V D e{ flC ie llC Y A 1 n c re _ M D . i U n n i- M ad uw a. M ee ,M w ew a, In cr u M L al ld U M (6 ) L A N D C O N S O U D A 1 l0 N IN M IN O R T A N l< 60 3S 80 T he lh aw ad iy aw ew a al le l 2 N lR P T an ia . C ro pp il ll il lle lla ity , P or m at io n o f u e r , r o u ~ 15 ln ni ti al e la nd c O lla ol id al iO il 15 U H r , r o u ~ f or m ee l S t C on lo li da ti ol l o f ow ne ra hl p S la ll b tl a a t C on ld 'd ' ft ft ft ft ft ft n n ft n ft n o n f t ft n n 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 0 0 a _ • • • http:SCOR.IMD.ID http:Canal.HW http:CA.MD.SD.KK http:CA.MD.MR http:SCOR.DOA.FD .. < :< "",.. ! ~~----g------------------------------------------------~Ia. ~ 10 " -g U ~ ~8..10 - .. 0 ..... "C)g .....c g 0 ~~Z ''::.. 0 .~ :z < 15 10 Z 0 0 '8 ,.; 'l$ -103.. Z 3 g J,~ ~ ~ :! C) ,-~ Z z ~ .;~ -:; '= - 10a, ..1:1 Z ~ ;;; .: CI ~ .;.. 10 .. ~ Q, .. 10 Oil ~> < .. .- ..-IZ 'S' ... :;;~ i.. :1= .. ::.!!"'0 .. a. -3~ .~ e .ll : 15 Q~ I I ... :t ~ J, .. .. :'''0 ...~ ,g 8.3 g~ 3 .. ... ~< .ll i ":; j 10 a i i:.! ..!! -:;-;- 10- ';a s .. aCIC ~§ .- .. _'" Or:( .ll !:I :; :~.g '"Q #~ Q '" : C) .. ~ :::: .. C) .. 0 :( 0 a 0 g ~ ~:~ a::: ~.~ .. .... II .. ~g uP:Q u~ ,..Q, ~ ,..a:l _u P: 0 P: ~ Nt:.. ... v .P - - Il R S E A R C H A C T IV IT IE S A G E N C Y O U T P U T 1 9 9 4 19 94 19 $ L O C A T IO N 19 93 /1 99 4 19 " D J ll lt l> n ll o ll lt 'B L B M A H A Y A L A M A H A Y A L A (9 ) R E S E A R O l W IT H N O I N T E R V E N T IO N U N ( R eM ar dl S I.a , fu tu re P ro je cl Ii A re aa ld ea li fJ ed lo r W il m a H ur ul uw ew a W al er ah ed P ro m J an ua ry 1 99 4 U pl O S ep le m be r 19 9$ S C O R T ea m , O th er W al er b a l_ R eM ar c: ll. A N ia l P l. aa eB 1 0 O r, aa in li O ll l. B io di ... .m ty lo rm ul .1 e p o li ci . E n d _ ia m ia lo rm au O ll IY 'le m ea la bl .h ed H er ba .t . m ed ic ia al p la al a E co no m io o f ir ri t. li o n E co T ou ri am V e, el al io n c: II .a a, e an d ra ia ra ll Su ,.. ..) ' W al er c o _ rv .l io n L an d le au re .t . c oa fi ic la A lr o ia du al ri ea la d e a _ o u a b o w le d ,e In uD ui lv .t . D Ti cl ic :e s A .. .. .. .r ia ll . . .: SW S Su b - W al er ab ed a D A S D ep ar tm ea t or A lr .r ia a Se rv ic e. C I C hi er S ea el ar y K K JC .iv u1 e0 4 , R U O R ea ou rc ea I ll er ,r o u p D S D iv il io aa l S ec re la ry L C L aa d C om m ia al oa er W W W ee ,. .w ew a R U O R ea ol lr ce I ll er o r, .a lu u O ll O N O ra m a N il db .r i D I D ir ec to r. Ir ri & al io a D W D ut ll w ew . N SC N .l o aa l S le er ia , C om m ll te e P D P or ea t D ep ar tm ea l W E A N ab aw el i E co ao m k A le a q IW IU llk w ew a PS C P ro vi ll ci ai ll ee ri a, c :o m m ilt ee P A D Pr ov ia cU A lr ku lt ur al d ep ar tm en t P N C P ro je cl N a n a ,_ e a l C _ m IU . . T1 6 T ra ct 6 W R N T W al eB u d R el O lir ce N an l, em en l T ea m D O A D ep ar tm en t o fA lr ku ll lJ e P O P ar m er O r, la iu li O ll W D W W ab ad lv ul w ew a P I P ea de th l) 'a S ab b , IN D Ir ri ,a dO il m an a, em ea l D M .IO ll L C D L a d C om m ia ai oa er a D ep ar tm en l W R W W a. ar am be w . w ew a N O O N o n -O o v er am ea la lO r, aa iu li O il E D E dl lC al io n D ep ar tm en t D A P H D u p n m ea t o fA ai m al P r0 4u ct iO ll aa d iW H ir iw ad llA A t w ew a N P C S N Il II i- po rp oM C o o p er .u ... . S oe ie ty P C C P ro vi ac ia l L an d C om m ui oa er D st D ep an m en l o fS m .U ia dl ll lr ie a T W T .ll r. oI e w e' lli ' C B O C _ m u a it y B aa ed O r, an lu lO il A C L O A sI I. C om m ia ai oo er . L o u l O ov er nm en t ID B Ia dl ll lr i. 1 D e . ... lo pm en l B oa rd A D A A lr ic li ll ur al e e. ...l op m ea t A lll llo ri ty lR D P In te ,r at ed R ur al D ev el op m ea l P ro je ct http:lormul.1e [ REFERENCE METRIX FOR MAJOR SOOR OUTPUTS AND WORKPLAN ACTIVITIES WORKPLAN - NILWALA WATERSHED OUfPUT OUfPUf AS PER TECHNICAL REPORT WORK PIAN NO ACfIVITY NO. 1a I Forming expanding and strengthening Resource user groups 1.1.2.4, 1.1.3.3,4.2 1.2.1.3 1.4.2, 2.1.4 2.2.1.2, 2.2.2.2., 2.2.3.2, 2.2.3.3, 2.3.1.,2.3.6,3.2.6 1a2 User organizations 1.5.2., 4.3, 1,.3.5 1a3 Sub-User councils 4.4 1 b 1 Training representatives of user groups 1.1.2.5, 1.1.3.4, 1.4.5, 2.1.6, 2.2.1.3, 22.2.3,3.2.7 lb2 user organiza tions 4.5 1b3 user sub-councils 4.5 1d1 Small grants to user groups to invest in common group assests 1.5.3, 2.3.8,2.3.9, 4.6 leI New commercial opportunities for user groups 1.1.2.3, 2.1.7, 2.2.1, 2,3, 3.1.3, 3.2.6,4.10 lfl Production companies linked to new markets 4.11 19l Rural based commercial activities with matching grants 1.3.3, 2.2.3, 2.1.1, 2.2.1.4,4.7 lhl User organizations conferred with legal status and power 4.3,4.7 2b1 Land leaseslusufruct processes leading to production companies 1.3.8,2.3,4.11 2b2 Commercial activities 1.1.1.1., 1.1.3.2, 1.1.3.5, 1.3.7, 1.4.6 2cl Demonstration of benefits of jioint management in small tanks 1.1.1.1, 1.1.1.2, Minimum of 3000 ha under joint management 1.2.1.1, 1.3.1, 1.3.4, 3.1.1.4,3.2.1.2, 3.2.2.4. 3a1 Improved systems of resource use and user operations monitoring 5 3b1 Officers trained in local level planning group formation and support at national, provmcial and divisional level 5.4,5.5 3cl Training on participatory natural resource management to NGOs and private sector organizations 5.4 3dl NGOs and private sector organizations providing technical managerial and commercial information to user groups 4. 1.3.2. 4a 1 Improved methods developed for multi -level planning and coordination in pilot watershheds 5 4b 1 Groups/organizations support and promote planning and coordination in pilot watersheds 5 4dl Improved land and water resources information and monitoring system designed 5 4el Institutional mechanism to coordinate and support land and water management practices made operational at provincial and national levels 5 Note: The activities of the work plan are ordered according to the major interventions. The above metrix links activities to the SCOR promised outputs appearing on , pages 21-24 of the technical report. 34 S C O R P R O JE C T - U PP E R N IL W A L A W A T E R SH E D W O R K PL A N F O R O C TO B ER ,. 19 93 - SE PT E M B E R ,. 19 95 T B B M B S A N D M A JO R A C T IV IT Y A R B A S I 'I1 il' .M B : SH AR .B D M A N A O EM EN T O F LA N D Ii. W A T B R R E SO U R C E S l. l ,N OI I-- -V w .... no bL o D e, od oo d Po r.. & II( FO ",, "t D ep t.) 1. 1. 1 I3 su tb iis h pe rD G U lII I l ad . - - IlS U fru aI oa ry n ,h ll 1. 1. L1 I3 su tb iis h ri ab ll b lim ite d _ of eo or oo cb ed f or es ts 1. 1. 1. 2 Id eu lif y pr lll le ut 1 '0 0 .. .. in d ap dt .d I'o re a ,0 0 _ 8 nu m be r o f p eo pl e im oo Ivt .d 1. 1. 1. 3 I3 su tb lis b fo ra ll la p m en lI by th e st .to w ith . .. .. lI ro uP l1 lo ra all iza tiO W l 1. 1. 2 In tro du c4 1 A gr o - fo ru cr y 1. 1. 2. 1 Id m tif y !o< ·.. tio .. . f or iI IIo rv on liO Q l! 1.1 .2. 2 De si3 u p oo ai bl e o ro pp in & sy rte lll a fo r I bo ve a r. .. 1. 1. 2. 3 R ai ae p la nt a 1. 1. 2. 4 I3 su tb lis h _ r Jlf OU PS 1. l. U Tr .cI w oI o& y Tn ol llf er u . e r l r ~ I- ­ - D el l1 ol lll trl tn o 1i0 li 1. 1. 3 E ab a_ M te nb rd p ro le ev elo p M :iI la to ._.I einc o. .e !hr. 12 0 U lle lli ln in ed Ab ov e Io ao tii oa lll d IIp 'lC ifJ c t n ~ in 20 <10 <10 20 PO tD S K N 1 IIO II- w oo d fo re st pr od ue te w bi Ie - w tA !h e fo re st s fo rm .1 c e. .. .. o f ~ de l)l rtm el lia 1. 1. 3. 5 E ill bI iih fl c8 it iu £ or p tO du ui oa . p ro