. . . • :..,¡_ " • Report Of The Externa! Advisory Committee GL0/91/013 ECOLO,GICALL Y SUSTAINABLE CASSAVA PLANT PROTECTION IN SOUTH AMERICA AND AFRICA (PROFISMA) Bahia, Brazil 29 August - 3 September, 1994 John H. Borden, O!air Donald W. Roberts Dewa M. Tantera Alexander Davidson, Resource Person 26 September, 1994 :-- "- .r -·· , . , .... ., • ~_;,) f'~"- ,~, .. -,_(""'J . . .· '· ,. . - . . UNICA~· L: iO.:'.:.·,c,Ul Y 0\.JLUMt.N 1 I'.CilH¡ • Acknowledgement The members of the EAC wish to thank the members of PROFlSMA and EMBRAP A for their warm hospitality during the course of the mission. In particular the EAC is grateful for the open and friendly manner in which PROFlSMA staff discussed their work with the EAC. While sometimes loud, the interactions were always positive, and contributed greatly to a successful review. List of Abbreviations This report contains the following abbreviations: CGM,Cassava Green Mi te CIAT, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropica, Columbia CNPMF, Centro Nacional de Pecquisa de Mandioca e Fruticultura, Crus das Almas, Brazil CVMV, Cassava Vein Mosaic Virus EAC, Externa! Advisory Committee EMBRAPA, Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária, Brazil ESCAPP, Environmentally Sensitive Cassava Plant Protection, Africa llCA, Inter-American Institute for Tropical Agriculture, Costa Rica nTA, International Institute for Tropical Agriculture, Africa IPM, Integrated Pest Management PROFlSMA, Protecao Fitossanitaria Sustentavel da Mandioca (Sustainable Cassava Plant Protection) • • • L INTRODUcnON There is a great need for environmentally sound crop protection for cassava, a staple food for millions of people, panicular! y the poor, in South America and Africa. Accordingly, UNDP approved in January 1993 a project to be executed by CIAT and llTA "to develop, test and implement sustainable cassava protection technology for the most damaging insect (sic) pests found in nonheast Brazil and in the African countries". (p.3. ofUNDP Recommendation to the Administrator appended to the PROJEcr DOCUMENT for GL0/91/013). (Ibis project is not restricted to insect pests, but also includes plant pathogens and weeds). The project, with a budget ofjust over $10 mili. (U.S.), aims to achieve by the end of its four year duration (p.20 of PROJEcr DOCUMENT): 1) enhanced national research capability, 2) farmer knowledge through training, 3) technology adoption, and 4) improved yield and quality of cassava. These aims are to be attained through three "interrelated and panially concurren! phases" dealing with (p.18 of PROJEcr DOCUMENT): 1) refining the e.xisting knowledge base through diagnostic surveys, ·z) farrner panicipation in research and development of relevant crop protection methods, with concomitan! training of farmers, extension workers and researchers, and 3) evaluation of progress in achieving training and technology implementation. The South American pan of the project (PROFISMA) is administered pan! y by CIAT and pan! y by the Brazilian federal government's agricultura! research station (EMBRAP A) at whose research station (CNPMF) the project's principal activities are based. IICA is also involved insofar as the PROFISMA staff in Brazil are officially IICA staff. The African component of the project (ESCaPP) is administered separately by llTA and four panicipating governments. Although the project was approved retroactive to 1 January, 1993, the South American component was not initiated un ti! the Iast quaner of 1993. Thus this review occurred approximately one year after the project's inception. Page 2 The terms of reference of the EAC included: 1) reviewing the quality, focus and progress ofthe project, with particular reference to research, training and collaboration, 2) evaluating the management and administration of the project, 3) providing suggestions to improve the probability that the project will have an importan! impact on cassava production, and 4) providing other relevant comments and suggestions. Because the EAC concurred strongly with the farrner-centered nature of the ' project document, it adopted as its principal criterion for examining project activities the implicit question "what does this do for the small farmer?" Although the project document does not use the term "integrated pest management" (IPM), the objectives are consistent with the principies of IPM. Hence during two days of field visits and three subsequent days of discussions with project personnel, the EAC conducted its review with these principies in mind. In the following review the EACs impressions of the key aspects of various components of the project are described. Specific suggestions are formulated in bold face· as 21 recommendations, although other suggestions may be embodied in the text. The report may contain sorne factual or interpretive errors. In large part any inaccuracy probably. was caused by the excessive amount of time required for Portuguese/English translations (and vice versa) of all discussions, allovting the EAC little opportunity to verify all of the contents of this re port. ll. FIELD VISITS The EAC welcomed the program of field visits as proposed by PROFlSMA. These visits allowed first-hand observation of the efficacy of the project's farmer- centered approach and the agro-ecological context in which PROFlSMA opera tes. On Monday, 29 August the EAC visited farms in the vicinity ofPiritiba, 300 km west of Cruz das Almas in the "Agreste" agro-ecological zone, intermediate between the humid coastal zone and the semi-arid "Sertáo" ofthe interior. The EAC observed severa! on-farrn trials and witnessed the explanation of these trials by PROFlSMA staff to farmers on whose fields they were conducted. Four pertinent points arose from this experience. • • Page 3 1) The growers were attentive and interacted in a free and frank manner with the PROF1SMA team. They did not appear to be overawed by any of their visitors. 2) The PROF1SMA professionals used plain, straight-forward Portuguese or even the growers' own idiom, and refrained complete! y from baffling "techno-talk". 3) The growers evideñtly appreciated the chance to observe t1le experiments in progress and the invitation to be present when the experiments are evaluated after three years. A clever enticement was provided by the PROF1SMA team in that the growers will be welcome to obtain planting material at will from the plants after the experiments are completed. 4) The local "prefeito" (approximately equivalen! to Mayor) attended !he field visit. Despite an impending election, he confined bis well-informed public remarks to agricultura! tapies, rather than electioneering, apparently reflecting his respect for agricultura! science and the PROF1SMA project. On Tuesday, 30 August, the EAC visited the "Colonia de Roberto Santos", a small-farmer settlementlocated in the coastal zone about 200 km northeast of Cruz das Almas. The growers in this community are part of the participating extension, training and survey components of the PROF1SMA program. In the field the EAC noted an interesting contras! in the altitudes of growers towards the extension staff. On being asked why they accepted the recommendation of the extensionists, sorne growers conveyed the impression that it would be unthinkable to do otherwise. This attitude possibly survives from previous authoritarian top-down relationships. On the other hand, one young grower was bold enough to state "we believe the 'tecnicos' beca use they have done their experiments here with us". This is the sort of reaction that the project is expected to generatel The EAC also observed two "cottage-industry", cassava-processing factories, where cassava roots are peeled, pulverized, pressed, dried/toasted, sized and bagged for sale as "farinha" (cassava flour). These factories are a mix of prívate enterprise capitalism and family-communallabor. The unit is owned by its constructor, who supervises the operations by each grower's family and friends, mainly women and children, in manual peeling and subsequent semi-mechanized steps. The owner receives Page4 payment as 20% of the product, which is currently worth ca. 20 Centavos of a Real per kg. There is great potential for improving the welfare of communities with such factories by improving tbe yield and quality of the raw product. Recommendation l. To recogníze their achievement, growers who complete a training program and participate with PROFISMA and extension staff in research and diagnostics should be presented witb a physical symbol oC recognition, perceptible to other members of their community, such as a T -shirt or cap bearing the PROFISMA logo. Growers who have become adept in training programs at diagnosing pest incidence and damage should be given a personal hand-lens as a working diagnostic tool that can be used in caringfor their crop. Recommendation 2. When scheduling permits, field visits for the EAC team should be planned before and arter formal discussions. The latter visit will aUow the EAC to reconfirm or amend its early perceptions prior to rmalizing lis report. Such visits need not be to the same areas. m REVIEW OF RESEARCH A. Participating Training Methods and Diagnostic Surveys In the first ofthe formal discussion sessions on Wednesday, 31 August the EAC found the proposed training program for research and extension workers, who will work with growers in diagnostics and participatory research, to be well underway. To date it involves 50 trainees from six states and 45 communities. Fifteen of the trainees are women. Three are PROFISMA staff. Farmers have not yet been formally trained, and participatory IPM research has not been attempted .. Rather, initial work has been to survey and rank the growers' perceptions of the causes and consequences of their horticultural and pest problems. This will result in a group of growers familiar with PROFISMA staff and collaborating extension workers. Moreover, the scientifically-based socioeconomic study will provide background data as a basis for comparison when participatory research on the implementation of IPM is evaluated. • Page S Rec:ommendation 3. Because ot the importance ot the lnitial dlagnostic work with growers, a concerted efrort should be made to accelerate the scientitlc valldation ot the grower dlagnoses and to complete the statistical analysls oC the results ot the . diagnostic study. The EAC again noted that in the second phase of the project "farmers will participate in the development and testing of a range of crop protection technology components" (p.l8 of PROJECf DOCUMENT). However, the entire project is projected to last only four years and there is relatively little time to initiate and develop the participatory research program. Moreover, although many of the researchers who appeared befare the EAC were working active! y with growers, none had any training in participatory research and none had yet been involved in such research as part of this project. Recommendation 4. In order to ensure that the participatory research efrort is successful, a smaU group of researchers, growers and extension workers should be brought together immediately to begin participatory research in a pilot p~oject involving an IPM component tbat is clearly ready for practic:al application. A. Cassava Green Mi te (CGM) CGM is a subject of critica! importance to the PROF!SMA effort, because its control is needed in the ]PM program, and the chances of its regulation by classical biological control are excellent. The two principal aspects of ongoing biological control work: are: 1) selection and release of predaceous, phytoseiid mites adapted to dry and humid cassava-growing regions, and 2) characterization, conservation, and perhaps importation into Africa, of Neozygites sp., a fungus which occurs naturally at epizootic levels in some cassava-growing regions of Brazil. Emphasis at present is on three species of phytoseiid mites currently in rearing at CNPMF, but releases of small numbers of these mi tes in fields heavily infested with CGM have apparently not resulted in their successful establishment. Pagc 6 Reconunendation 5. Since there may be etrective and easUy reared predatory mites as yet undiscovered, survey lor other species and biotypes should be continued throughout the natural range of CGM, particularly In dry areas where NeozygiJes is not very effective. Thc rearing of largc numbers of predaceous phytoseiid mi tes for rclease in classical biological control is a critica! componen! of this projcct. Because this effort is limited at present by the inability lo rear largc numbcrs of cassava green miles in Brazil, thc EAC met separately with a small group of scienlists concemcd wilh Ibis problem. Thc scienlists' opinion lhal rearing of lhese miles sho11ld takc place at EMBRAP A in Cruz das Almas was supported by lhe EAC. In touring lhe station, thc EAC confirmed thal adequate facilities for rearing of predalors were available, that lhe principal scientists involved were highly compeleni, and lhal limited production of the cassava grcen mite was indeed a majar impedimenl The impedimenl would be relieved if a a dedicaled scrcen-house for rearing CGM were conslrucled. The enlarged prey and predalor rearing program would rcq~ire a full time Research Assistanl (not a degree-holding professional). A good phasc-contracl compound microscope is rcquired for confirmalion of the idenlity of predaceous phyloseiids in rearing, and for identifying new specimens from field colleclions. Such a microscope has been budgcled for, bul is nol yet purchased. Finally therc will be a need for ongoing malerials and supplies. The approximate costs (SUS) for lhese items are as follows: Capital Expendilures Screcn-house Phase contrast microscope Total Annual Operating Expenditures Research Assistant, $20,000 10,000 $30,000 salary and benefits $10,000 Materials and supplies 6,000 Total $16,000 Page7 Recommendatlon 6. Purchase of the budgeted phase-contrast microscope should proceed immediately, the 1994 budget should be revised to provide runds ror rapid construction of a dedicated screen-house, and future budgets should include provision for a Research Assistant in mite rearing, and for associated materiais and supplies. Recommendation 7. Provision should be made for the key researcher involved in phytoseiid production to visit the liTA mite-rearing facility in Africa, and if possible to visit European facilities while in transit, to assist her in optimizing her own mass- production schemes. The EAC noted that nucleic acid or antibody-based identification of predator mites is possible. However, it felt that development ofsuch techniques is not immediately necessary if adequate microscopic capability is provided. Neozygires sp. is apparently already important in controlling CGM populations in humid to semi-humid regions of Brazil. This is a very interesting and importan! (hot) area of study. It m ay be of central importance in the overall UNDP project in that Brazilian strains may succeed in protecting cassava ftom CGM in Africa follo~ing widespread, classical biological control introductions. Considerably more information is needed on the biology and taxonomy of the fungus. Also practica! studies need to be carried out on schemes to mass produce and release this fungus into the field in an effective manner. These studies would include speed of spore germination as well as spore numbers and rate of spore production. The EAC noted that sorne of the research reported was directed toward sophisticated in vitro culture techniques that were beyond the province of the current PROFISMA project. Recommendation 8. Research on N eozygites sp. in PROFISMA should be llmited only to those propagation and re le ase techniques that ha ve immediate practica! potentiaL The PRQFISMA project may be used as a magnet to attract ancillary runding for more baslc, strategic research. C. Cassava Mealybug, Homworm and Whitefly The biological control of these three pests offers sorne unique opportunitics for PROFISMA. For example, the mealybug, Phenacoccus he"eni, presents an opportunity PageS to utilize classical biological control techniques developed in Africa for P. manihoti. Exploration in the probable site of origin has yielded a number of parasites and predators, plus a fungus. Three of these parasites have been selected for further study, including their interactions in caged environments at CIAT. The EAC especially approves of the recently initiated studies to track parasite spread following release in Brazil, and to make assessments of the environmental impact of these releases. Recommendatlon 9. Based on.the outstanding results otthe Atrlean projeet with parasites oC P. nuznihoti, PROFISMA should engage in an expanded release program of the parasites of P. he"eni in Brazil. Coneurrently, the seareh should continue ror additional natural enemies. The biological control of cassava hornworm involves the use of a naturally occurring baculovirus, a group of insect-specific viruses of virtually no threat to non- target organisms. This virus presents an excellent opportunity for participatory research and development with farmers. For example, grower cooperatives could produce and store virus preparations for use when needed by member farmers. Studies on whitefly control by PROFISMA emphasize the use of a fungus, Cladosporium sp. There is virtually nothing known outside of Brazil on this fungus. and studies on its biology,- production and applied use are encouraged by the EAC. D. Environmental Assessment The EAC commends PROFISMA for planning to conduct studies on the effect of their pest control efforts on non-target organisms. However, the proposed research appeared to be solely on negative effects, and also included laboratory tests on vertebrales. Recommendation 10. Be cause of the strong likelihood tbat none or the biological control agents under consideration will ha ve any adverse environmental impact, studies should concentrate on potential beneficia! impacts, as well as adverse ones, and should be structured so that the data collected are uselul to the overall biological control endeavor. .. . . Page 9 Recommendation 11. Beca use of the requirements for registration or blological pesticides, any testlng of microbial or viral pestlcides on vertebrates, lt required, should be done In a laboratory certified by the appropriate registratlon agency. E. Crop Loss Assessment Extensive studies are underway by PROF1SMA in which pesticides (microbial and chemical) are used experimentally to kili ene or more pests selectively and to leave others on the test plants. These experiments require different treatments in different regions with different pest complexes. By selectively removing cenain pests, the impact of others can be determined. The EAC considers this. research to be importan! in providing area-wide baseline data on the impact of cassava pests. When analyzed statistically the voluminous data being collected can be used to justify research emphasis on the most importan! pests. They can also provide reference points against which new pest control treatments can be measured accurately, and they can be used as a basis for determining benefit/cost ratiosfor the IPM program. Recommendation 12. Statistical analysis of the data on pest-caused crop losses should be expedited. F. Root Rots Root rots in the genera Phytophthora and Fusariam are predominan! among the plethora of organisms inhabiting diseased cassava roots, and are judged to be the cause of substantiallosses in certain circumstances. A long-standing research program at CNPMF has yielded a number of management methods that could readily be applied in growers' fields. These methods include: the use of toleran! varieties; compatible interplantings; treatments of cuttings with antagonistic microorganisms, mycorrhyzal fungi and endophytes; planting on furrowed ridges; and rotation with other crops to reduce inocula. Recommendation 13. Consideration should be given by PROFISMA to the rapid lncorporation of these methods into the IPM program In conjunctlon with methods to be used against other pests. Page 10 E. Witches Broom Mycoplasma This disease has caused a majar problem in the state oí Ceara, and could spread to other areas. Research to determine its vector(s), including ribosomal-based PCR analysis is well underway. In addition, a commendable project is field-testing five resistan! varietics with 70 farmers in 10 crimmunitics. Research is also continuing on disease distribution and yield loss asscssment. H. Cassava Vein Mosaic Virus (CVMV) The most serious foliar disease in the project region is CVMV. It differs substantially from the cassava mosaic virus in Africa," India and Sri Lanka in that it causes substantialleaf-vein clearing and stunting. The disease has been succcssfully transmitted experimentally only through infected stem cuttings and by top grafting. A recently-developed PCR-based detection technique will be useful in detecting virus in imported or exported cuttings, and may be used succcssfully in determining the vector(s). While crop losses due to CVMV have not yet been determined, they are hypothcsized to be substantial. Disease symptoms can be greatly reduced by the use of high-quality planting material. Rccommendation 14. Becausc apparcntly diseasc-Crce plants can be produced Crom high-quality planting material, tralning or growers in good propagatlon techniques should be lncorporated immediately in the participatory IPM program. The production oC vigorous plants may also reduce the impact or other pests. L Agronomic Practices and Weed Control The objectivcs of weed management in cassava are to reduce production costs, increase productivity and preserve soil fertility. Additional outcomes are the prevention of water loss and soil erosion and the provision of reservo ir plants for beneficia! insects. Because the complex of weed species differs even between local arcas, continuing research into management systems will be needed. Recommendation 15. Because the potential galns are great and management techniques tor weeds are well advanced, weed management should be incorporated rapidly into grower participation IPM. • • Page 11 Recommendation 16. In addition to assessing the acceptability oC weeds for beneficia) insects occurring naturally in the tteld, collaborative research should be done which assesses the acceptability o{ various weed species as reservoirbosts for the phytoseüd mites being considered for classical biological control of the CGM. Because of the vigorous, ongoing research on agronomic practices, an E.\4BRAPA plan! physiologist, who was not previously in PROFISMA, has been attracted to work in the proj ect. His work on the effect of various weed management regimes on the growth and water relations of cassava will assist in selecting the best cover crop treatment for improving the hydric conditions for the cassava crop. In the field and in formal discussion the effect of cassava in depleting soil nutrients, particular) y nitro gen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium, was emphasized. Converse) y, great gains in productivity can be achieved by such techniques as mulching. The EAC was intrigued by the very positive results of an ambitious project involving many growers in Ceara, in which cassava crops are mulched with debris from camauba palm fronds harvested for their wax. It appears that such techniques-would b.e useful in other arid areas. J. Experimental Design In general, the EAC found that in a cursory examination the experiments being conducted by PROFISMA were of sound design. Yet virtually all biological scientists, including members of the EAC, ha ve encountered situations in which experiments that appeared to be of sound design, were rightly criticized for deficiencies found after the fact by externa) rcviewers. In most cases there was insufficient time for the EAC to examine experimental design dosel y. It might ha ve been useful had further discussion taken place when the EAC had concems about such factors as adequate replication, size of field plots, buffer zones, testing more than ene hypothesis in the same experiment, and the statistical analysis of data. The EAC noted that in most research groups, scientists discuss their proposed experiments with others (often heatedly), and in most govemment research stations in North America, the station statistician must approve the experimental design and the proposed altematives for statistical analysis of the data prior to initiating an experiment. Page 12 Recommendatlon 17. PROFISMA should selecta small group o!scientists wbo are experfenced in experimental design and analysfs o! data to serve as a consulting group Cor other scientists. The objectives o!the consulting group would be to ensure that there is confidence in the expected results and that statistical analysis can be done rapidly and routinely after the experiment. IV. PROJECf MANAGEMENT Throughout its mission, the EAC was aware that it was evaluating both CIAT and CNPMF activities. This was not easy for two reasons: 1) lack of physical presence of the EAC in Columbia for first-hand observations of GIAT operations, and 2) the apparently harmonious integration of the activiiies of both institutions, so that it was difficult at times to tell where the efforts by one institution stopped and those of the other staned. In pan the integration of activities has been facilitated by the fact that one of the two Scientific Coordinators and the Training Coordinator of PROFISMA are CIA T employees seconded to CNPMF. The successful integration has been further facilitated by the efforts of CIAT and CNPMF personnelto make their work truly intemational in its scope. However, future EACs would be well advised to compare progress, workplans and budgets to determine just how integrated the South American work really is. The EAC met for the moming of 2 September with a group of administrators including the two Scientific Coordinators and the Training Coordinator of PROFISMA, a representative of CIAT, the Director and Heads of Finance and Technical Services of CNPMF, and the project Bookkeeper/Accountant. The project monies are necessarily administered in a tortuous fashion involving initial disbursement of funds to CIAT, and secondary disbursement of the Brazilian componen! toan account in Brasilia from which EMBRAPA can draw. CIAT charges 14% overhead on its ponion of the project budget and 4% of the EMBRAPA componeilt. Initially there was no overhead retumed to EMBRAPA, a 5% charge is now levied, and this may have to be increased in the future. Severe limitations in the progress of the PROFISMA effort have occurred in the inability of the EMBRAP A bureaucracy to respond to the PROFISMA need for rapid purchases of equipment, e.g. the phase-<:ontrast microscope needed for the predaceous mi te work ora rotary evaporator required in the weed science project. Various solutions • . . • Page 13 to this dilemma were explored, e.g. procurement through UNDP, or having CIAT make purchases and donating the items te EMBRAPA, with a corresponding reduction in the EMBRAPA componen! of the budget. Recommendation 18. EMBRAP A/CNPMF should do its utmost to streamline its procurement procedures so that PROFISMA activities are not delayed. lfthis is not possible, PROFISMA, with the assistance ofUNDP, shciuld flnd a way to bypass EMBRAPA. A review of the 1993 and 1994 budgets disciosed a substantial surplus from 1993 and projected under expenditures for 1994. These ha ve resulted from such factors as late start of the project (even though payment was made ri:troactive te 1 January 1993) as weil as delays in hiring personnel or retaining consultants for whom salaries had been budgeted, and correspondingly reduced needs for iogistic and material support. It was noted that UNDP permits the carry-over of budget surpiuses into succeeding years, and that the developing PROF1SMA program wiil easily absorb these surpluscs with cssential expenditures, e.g. the screen-house for mite rearing, and extra vehicles needed because of the huge geographic arca covered by this ambitious project. The degree of flexibility that PROF1SMA has with respect to reailocation of budget items was also explored. It was noted by the EAC that UNDP will tolerate approximately :!:5% leeway en expenditures for most budgeted items. However, further deviations, e.g. using money originaily aiiocated for consultants to purchase a vehicie, would require a revised budget, and if necessary a revised workplan, to be approved by UNDP befare any expenditures were made. The members of the EAC, who are al! scientists with experience managing very large research projects, felt that UNDP budgetary procedures were very restrictive. Most research granting agencies allow the researcher full budget flexibility. They "audit" projects primarily en whether or not the scientific and technological output is of the highest quality, in sufficient amount, and more or less en target. (Targets are often met incompletely because scientific research, unlike engineering, always has unanticipated uncertainties that redirect the course of an investigation). However, the EAC felt that in this case, it would be unwise to allow such flexibility in budget administration unless there was very rigorous examination by future EAC's to ensure that expenditures had been made en items that were truiy consisten! with PROF1SMA's objectives. Page 14 Sorne problems associated with personnel were noted by the EAC. The delay in appointing a National Training Coordinator has impeded progress of the work by the PROFISMA Training Coordinator in grower-related projects. EMBRAPA hadan appointee selected who opted for another opportunity, anda renewed recruitment process is well underway. There is a particular problem with health care benefits for PROFISMA employees, who are administratively classed as employees of llCA, rather than EMBRAP A, and thus are ineligible for benefits. The altematives explored to date are prohibitively expensive, leaving most PROFISMA staff without coverage. Recommendation 19. PROFIS!'rWEMBRAPA should continue to search diligently for a solution to the health care plan dilemma for PROFISMA employees. One possible solution would be for the arrangement oC a special contract with EMBRAPA to cover beneflts only Cor the duration ofPROFISMA. During the hearings, the EA- witnessed two projects by collaborating scientists, a plant physiologist and a virologist, who had been attracted to work in the project by the opportunities for collaborative work in retum for minar supporting budgets, but not salaries. A large project like this can be a magnet for such collaborations, which in tum can provide useful retums to the project. Recommendation 20. As opportunities are disclosed during the course ofresearch, PROFISMA should seek further collaboration with extemal scientists in areas that would contribute to meeting the project's objectives. 'lbere should be sufficient budget flexibility anticipated by UND P to acconunodate provision oC funds Cor su eh collaborations. During the entire week of review, the EAC heard much of impacts caused by various practices and pests, and gains that could be achieved through a multitude of horticultura! and pest management tactics. However, almost never were there monetary values placed on such impacts. If available, such values would provide strong supporting evidence of the true value of the PROFISMA effort and would allow benefit/cost analysis to begin immediately. • • • • • • Page 15 Recommendation 21. PROFISMA should consider hiriDg a pracdcaUy-orienud economist, perhaps as a consultant, to place monetary values on lmpacts and benefits associaud with the IPM program, and to i.D.itiau benefit/cost studles that can predict the future pay-off' oC the program. • ,