ANNUAL REPORTING FOR THE YEAR 2012 FROM PIM/CRP2 TO THE CONSORTIUM CGIAR Research Program on Policies, Institutions and Markets (PIM) May 2013 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 2 Contents A. KEY MESSAGES ........................................................................................................................... 3 B. IMPACT PATHWAY AND INTERMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES ...................................... 4 C. PROGRESS ALONG THE IMPACT PATHWAY ............................................................................... 5 D. GENDER RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS ......................................................................................... 8 E. PARTNERSHIP-BUILDING ACHIEVEMENTS ................................................................................. 9 F. CAPACITY BUILDING ................................................................................................................... 9 G. RISK MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................................. 10 H. LESSONS LEARNED ................................................................................................................... 10 I. CGIAR RESEARCH PROGRAM FINANCIAL REPORT ................................................................... 11 List of Annexes Annex 1: CRP indicators of progress, with glossary and targets .............................................................. 12 Annex 2: Performance indicators for gender mainstreaming with targets defined ................................ 21 Annex 3: CRP financial reporting templates ............................................................................................ 22 Annex 4: Summary of gender issues identified in each subtheme .......................................................... 60 Annex 5: Typology of PIM partners and snapshot of the geographic distribution of PIM partners........ 62 Annex 6: Interactions with a significant interface between science and policy ...................................... 63 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 3 A. KEY MESSAGES Introduction With the close of 2012, PIM has completed its first year of implementation. Funds from Windows 1 and 2 of the CGIAR Fund, ongoing bilateral and Window 3 commitments, and the active participation of 11 CGIAR centers allowed PIM to pursue work in its thematic areas. PIM received $27.0 million in Window 1 and 2 funds, $18.6 million of which came in the last two months of the year. Implementation proceeded throughout the year, but at a cautious pace in light of the timing of disbursements and the need to rely on pre-financing out of the reserves of the lead center. Expenditure from Windows 1 and 2 for 2012 was $15.5 million, or 20 percent of total expenditure. Bilateral and Window 3 expenditure was $62.5 million. Synthesis of Progress and Challenges PIM’s work in 2012 contributed directly to system-level outcomes on reduced poverty and improved food security through work on science policy (joint with CCAFS), sectoral policy and expenditure, social protection, asset accumulation, and linking smallholders to markets. PIM contributed indirectly to better health and nutritional outcomes by contributing to metrics—for example, through the release in 2012 of the Global Hunger Index, a tool designed to support tracking of three dimensions of nutritional outcomes (child stunting, caloric adequacy, and child mortality). PIM contributed to improved management of natural resources through joint work with CRP Water, Land, and Ecosystems on modeling of the water sector, and through work on maintenance of agricultural biodiversity, governance of aquatic systems, and improved soil quality. PIM finalized its gender strategy and supported dissemination of the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index as a tool for monitoring progress on gender issues. In this first year, accomplishments are largely the release of products and outputs, many of which were ongoing at the start of the program. Attention to tracking of impact will increase in 2013 and subsequently, since in many cases impact can only be discerned over an extended time frame. Managerial attention during this year centered on establishing administrative procedures and a core team, clarifying impact pathways and aligning activities to them, and strengthening strategic focus. Consultations with stakeholders were held for MENA in Beirut (in February), for Asia in New Delhi (in July), and for Africa south of the Sahara in Dublin (in September, as part of the Dublin process to strengthen links between CGIAR and African partners). PIM faced challenges with regard to administrative systems, uncertainty of funding, timing of disbursement, and mismatch of expectations. Each of these issues is addressed in Section G below. Significant Achievements We highlight two achievements of 2012 in this summary statement. Detail on additional achievements is available in the annexes to this report. The Global Futures project began in late 2008 with funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and with the objective to improve modeling techniques for prioritization of agricultural research. In 2012 the project entered the PIM portfolio within the theme on foresight. With the Global Futures program, PIM is helping CGIAR identify “best bet” technologies suitable for wider adoption and/or accelerated development. Researchers involved in the program are incorporating analysis of technologies into a modeling exercise to simulate returns under different assumptions about changes in the economic and agroecological environments. In 2012, more than 150 technologies were identified by seven centers (CIAT, CIMMYT, CIP, ICRISAT, ILRI, ICRAF, and IRRI) for 15 crops, livestock technologies, and agro-forestry management systems. A global, spatially explicit, open agricultural database to support improved modeling in foresight studies is under construction to provide geospatial tools to support the CGIAR Research Programs and the Consortium in decisions on allocation of resources. Linked to this is an effort to create a broader open agricultural database of PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 4 geospatial tools (www.mapSPAM.info). PIM is concurrently engaged in mapping activities within the Consortium Research Programs and supporting development of the New Alliance Technology Platform (http://caadp-cgiar.org/). The latter is a commitment undertaken by the G8 in 2012 to facilitate more rapid uptake of improved technologies in selected countries in Africa south of the Sahara. The tools for identification of priorities for agricultural research will be available to partners, such as the national research systems, and will inform development of the Science Agenda for African Agriculture. PIM is also providing a framework for CGIAR’s research on value chains to enhance consistency in methodology and facilitate cross-center learning. In 2012, the group led by PIM began the task of mapping the centers’ value chain interventions by commodity and location, developing a consistent terminology for use across CGIAR, assessing and strengthening the tools produced by the research teams, and evaluating the impact of the interventions. The initiation of this work in 2012 has been enthusiastically received by participants from ILRI, ICRAF, CIP, Bioversity, IITA, CIAT, ICRISAT, and IFPRI. The tools being developed by ILRI for CRP Livestock and Fish and those by CIAT under PIM will be integrated into the in the work of CRP Humidtropics. ILRI’s tools to measure value chain performance will also be used in A4NH and Livestock and Fish on the topics of nutrition and genetic diversity, respectively. The tools will provide inter alia sampling guidelines, questionnaires, and procedure for constraint analysis developed as part of the work of PIM under Theme 3. Through PIM IITA is analysing the impact of different interventions for upgrading value chains of cassava and these will be used in CRP HumidTropics. CIAT is also working on value chains and gender in CRP Forests, Trees, and Agroforestry, as part of the gender team (comprised of CIFOR, ICRAF, Bioversity). This work will be incorporated into the strategic gender work on value chains supported under PIM for replication in other CRPs as relevant. A web-based platform for knowledge sharing is under development. In addition to planned sharing of tools and approaches, the work on value chains draws on impact assessments already in process at the launch of PIM. Examples of promising work include interventions to improve dairying in Vietnam, facilitation of working capital loans in Uganda, the design of simple weather insurance instruments in Ethiopia, and work on underutilized Andean grains. The work in Vietnam resulted in a change in the terms of the contract between milk producers and processors, with increased quality and higher prices for producers. Work in Uganda resulted in a change in how the participating bank structures lending to farmer organizations. Work on weather insurance in Ethiopia has been taken up by an insurance firm and the instrument is offered commercially to smallholders. Work on underutilized Andean grains, native and wild fruit trees, and chili varieties has been embedded in activities of partners including smallholder farmer associations, development agencies, private companies, and local and national government agencies, and has facilitated conservation of species through commercialization by smallholders. B. IMPACT PATHWAY AND INTERMEDIATE DEVELOPMENT OUTCOMES The link between policy-oriented research and policy change is complex. Research is one input into a process in which researchers are in most cases not direct decision agents. Research can influence outcomes through selection of topics, identification of partners and stakeholders, relevance and timeliness of results, and extent and modes of distribution. PIM encourages relevance of research supported under the program by asking researchers to use a decision tree including the following questions:  Why is the proposed topic important?  What action might follow upon results of the research?  Would the action contribute to objectives of CGIAR as expressed in the SRF?  Is action politically feasible at this time? PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 5  Who are the main agents and stakeholders who can undertake action?  What information do they need and when do they need it? PIM has three main product lines: research of global relevance to clarify trends and identify issues requiring attention of the global community; new metrics, models, data, and tools for assessment of issues and measurement of progress; and location-specific analysis relevant to policy decisions in specific jurisdictions. Intermediate development outcomes (IDOs) for the three types of products differ, and in all cases the IDOs relate to changes in the enabling environment. For the first type of product, publication in peer reviewed and more popular journals is noted and the volume of readership and citations tracked. For the second, access and use of tools is tracked and recorded. For the third, the policy change that is the focus of research is noted, the outcome of the policy process recorded, and stakeholders in the process identified. A selection of the latter are polled to provide views on whether the research was relevant or not. This approach to assessing impact was introduced in 2012, and is being implemented in 2013. A template for documentation of stakeholder views has been developed as part of the work on partnerships. C. PROGRESS ALONG THE IMPACT PATHWAY Major Achievements by Theme In order to achieve greater internal coherence within the PIM portfolio, the 10 themes and subthemes are collapsed into seven outcome areas: science policy, sectoral and macroeconomic policy, adoption of technology and diffusion of innovation, social protection and management of rural risks, participation of women in rural economic activities, ownership of assets by the poor, and strengthening of value chains. Achievements in 2012 are reported below under these seven categories. Science policy: The Global Futures project has integrated efforts across seven participating centers and is building a consortium-wide research program. Key features of the work on Global Futures and foresight modeling are reported above and not repeated here. Work on science policy under PIM is contributing to the design of the Science Agenda for African Agriculture under the leadership of the Forum for Agricultural Research in Africa (FARA). Work on biosafety and biotechnology policies in Africa, Asia, and Central America continued in 2012. When the Government of Kenya issued a directive in November 2012 banning importation of products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the already-established engagement of the biosafety project with Kenyan authorities positioned the team well to provide relevant information. A reversal of the policy is under consideration by Kenyan authorities. The Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators (ASTI) global report on investment in agricultural research was released at the Global Conference on Agricultural Research for Development (GCARD) in Uruguay in October 2012. Sectoral and macroeconomic policies: PIM supported application of the MIRAGE-BIOF CGE model in analysis used in consideration of a change in the European Union (EU) biofuel policies proposed by the European Commission on October 17, 2012. The new proposal would reduce the share of biofuels originating from food crops and would remedy some of the unintended environmental consequences of biofuel mandates. PIM supported work on the export ban on maize in Tanzania that was referenced in President Kikwete’s decision to reverse the ban. PIM is developing tools to assist in analysis of alternative allocations of public spending in African countries by updating the library of social accounting matrices used for computable general equilibrium models. PIM supported a study of the fertilizer market in Ethiopia that showed large carryover stocks and resulted in the government’s decision to cancel planned imports of 250,000 tons, saving more than $5 million in storage costs. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 6 Adoption of technology and diffusion of innovation: Work in Nigeria and in Ghana investigated the potential demand among farmers for both animal traction and mechanized land preparation, and will assist with design of models of mechanization appropriate for the factor endowments in these two countries. In East Africa, the volunteer farmer trainer approach developed as part of an activity on innovative extension approaches has been adopted by Heifer International, the Kenya Dairy Farmers Federation, the Uganda Dairy Farmers Federation, and the BMGF-funded East Africa Dairy Development Project, which spans five countries (Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Tanzania) and targets 400,000 farmers. Social protection and management of rural risks: PIM has supported evaluations in Brazil (Bolsa Familia), South Africa (Child Support Grant), and Ethiopia (Productive Safety Net Program). Work comparing the alternatives of payments in cash, in kind, and in the form of vouchers continued in Ecuador, Niger, Uganda, and Yemen. Efforts are under way in Bangladesh to evaluate alternative delivery mechanisms for safety net programs jointly with the World Food Programme. The impact assessments and cross-country learning contribute to improved design of programs. Participation of women in rural economic activities: The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index was launched in February 2012. An analysis of the determinants of the growth of rural nonfarm employment in Bangladesh indicated that real wages, particularly for females, have increased since the late 2000s. An understanding of the factors contributing to this will allow replication where feasible. PIM actively supported the Global Conference on Women in Agriculture, sponsored by the Global Forum on Agricultural Research (GFAR) and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) in Delhi in March 2012. This conference elicited a much stronger commitment to gender in agriculture from many of the regional National Agricultural Research Systems (NARS), and served as the launching of a Gender in Agriculture Partnership (GAP), led by GFAR, with involvement of many NARS, NGOs, and international organizations, including the CGIAR. In addition to helping to mobilize this commitment, PIM provided evidence and new methods to address several of the themes, especially the themes of strengthening women’s assets, and women’s empowerment in agriculture. Ownership of assets by the poor: The Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi) published Collective Action and Property Rights for Poverty Reduction: Insights from Africa and Asia, with the findings of a major research project in eight countries (www.ifpri.org/book- 45/ourwork/program/land-resource-management-poverty-reduction). A draft paper on the links between tenure security and food security in Ethiopia (http://www.umb.no/clts- no/article/presentation-at-idb-workshop) and the best practice notes from the land governance assessment framework (LGAF) tool for Ghana, Malawi, and Rwanda identified challenges and offered recommendations to improve the security of property rights in these countries. Strengthening value chains: Work on a common set of tools and methodologies for CGIAR is described earlier in this report. Progress toward Outputs More than 200 products (concept notes, papers, reports, books, book chapters, datasets, databases, models, maps, methodology documents, presentations, e-information outputs, and other items) in various stages of completion have been listed for 2012. Although systems for tracking products and their use are still in development, reports based on current information indicate that 89 open access databases were made available, for which an estimated 652,275 users are recorded. See Annex 1. At the end of the first year, progress toward outputs can be summarized as follows: Science Policy • Under the Global Futures program, PIM developed a draft report including more than 150 technologies with potential for scaling up PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 7 • ASTI (Agricultural Science and Technology Indicators) established an institutionalized data collection system in Africa south of the Sahara and released a report describing recent trends in agricultural research and development spending at GCARD in Uruguay. Sectoral and Macroeconomic PoliciesReport on biofuels using the MIRAGE CGE model.  Report on fertilizer market in Ethiopia with recommendation on optimal stockholding.  Report on Tanzania’s maize export ban with recommendation to remove it.  The Arab Spatial Development and Food Security Atlas, a database that contains maps and data for more than 150 food security–related indicators. Adoption of Technology and Diffusion of Innovation  Recommendation on volunteer farmer trainers adopted by the East African Dairy Development Project for use in five countries in East Africa (Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia, and Tanzania) and targeting 400,000 farmers.  The HarvestChoice project enhanced its database of indicators relevant to crop productivity and potential yield gaps, expanded its suite of modeling tools, and launched a new website.  Diffusion of Improved Varieties in Africa (DIVA) project, co-financed by PIM, yielded new insights on questions of adoption of improved technologies in Africa. Social Protection and Management of Rural Risks  Impact evaluation of the Child Support Grant (CSG) requested by the Government of South Africa contributed to the government’s decision to retain the program. The Minister for Social Development reported the results of impact evaluation of the CSG at a national press conference in May 2012.  Ongoing evaluation of Ethiopia’s Productive Safety Net Program contributes to adjustment in program during implementation and supports renewed funding by development partners. Participation of Women in Rural Economic Activity  Sex-disaggregated data on labor force participation from the ICRISAT Village Level Studies allow observation of changes over time in India and Bangladesh.  The Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) was launched in February 2012 at the United Nations in New York, followed by launches at the Houses of Parliament in the UK and India. The WEAI rolled out in 19 countries that are part of the US government’s Feed the Future initiative. Ownership of Assets by the Poor  The Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project assessed eight projects for their impact on gender inequalities, asset disparities, and rural livelihoods. Results are used to adjust program design.  Work on property rights, power relations, and benefit sharing in common lands in Asia and Africa and development of rapid tenure assessment (RaTA) tools enables better understanding of historical tenure conflict and informs administrative procedures for management and prevention of conflict.  The Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi) published Collective Action and Property Rights for Poverty Reduction: Insights from Africa and Asia, with the findings of a major research project in eight countries (www.ifpri.org/book-45/ourwork/program/land- resource-management-poverty-reduction). Findings are used to inform regulations for land administration. Strengthening of Value Chains  A study of changes in rice and potato value chains in Bangladesh, China, India, and Vietnam found that value chains have modernized rapidly and are shorter than previously assumed. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 8 The study showed that transportation costs are lower than expected, and directs attention to other factors that constitute marketing costs.  Work on upgrading cassava value chains has been adopted in Nigeria as part of the agricultural transformation program. Progress Toward Achievement of Outcomes During its first year of implementation, PIM has made limited progress toward achievement of long- term outcomes, as is to be expected. Observed outcomes in the form of policy changes and use of new tools are noted in the section on outputs above, although attribution of the outcome to the research product is not claimed. A fuller listing of outcomes is presented in Annex 6. Progress Toward Impact Impact can be observed only after outcomes are achieved and remain in place for some time. After one year of implementation no impact can be attributed to research undertaken under PIM. Among the outputs noted above, those most likely to generate impact in the near term are (i) the decision to retain the Child Support Grant in South Africa (continued payments for vulnerable children with impact on nutrition and survival rates); (ii) impact assessments of the Ethiopia Productive Safety Net Program (impact on program design and decision of government and donors to continue support); (iii) the study on fertilizer stocks in Ethiopia (impact on efficiency of public expenditure in agriculture); and (iv) work on the maize export ban in Tanzania (impact through increased earnings of maize farmers and traders). D. GENDER RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS PIM completed its gender strategy in 2012 and it was approved on March 1, 2013. Gender is mainstreamed by inclusion in many activities within the portfolio, and addressed strategically in selected pieces of free-standing work. As expressed in the strategy, PIM will develop guidelines for collecting and analyzing data so that datasets developed for other objectives will also be useful for gender analysis. In 2012 researchers developed a framework to conceptualize and measure women’s access to and ownership of land using existing nationally representative, sex-disaggregated data on land ownership and control in Sub-Saharan Africa. PIM has initiated work on the gender dimensions of adoption of improved technology. A doctoral dissertation undertaken as part of this work addressing social networks, innovation, and empowerment was recommended for the best thesis award by the Indian Institute of Technology–Bombay. Gender Equality Targets Defined PIM’s work on gender equality targets is part of its effort on developing tools and methods. Work under PIM will identify the sex-disaggregated agricultural data that are available through CGIAR and national governments. Demand for gender analysis in the evaluation of ongoing programs financed by development partners is high, and PIM is already active through legacy programs, such as the design of the WEAI. These activities will be strengthened in 2013 and 2014. Mainstreaming Gender Analysis in Other PIM Activities Attention to gender is already strong in the research on social protection, assets, and value chains. Areas with potential for increasing gender analysis include the foresight work, especially gender dimensions in foresight scenarios (Subtheme 1.1), and the work on policy processes (Subtheme 2.1). Gender expertise is well represented in the management team, of which the gender leader (Cheryl Doss of Yale University) is a member. Much of this work is still in early stages, and the PIM gender leader is working with the teams to ensure effective implementation. See Annex 4, Summary of Gender Issues Identified in Each Subtheme, for a more complete listing. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 9 E. PARTNERSHIP-BUILDING ACHIEVEMENTS PIM has diverse relationships with a multitude of organizations, both internal to CGIAR and external, and ranging from pure transactional relationships to full partnerships. Aligning PIM with Priorities in National and Regional Bodies During 2012 PIM held regional consultations in South Asia and the Middle East / North Africa to discuss regional priorities and strengthen partnerships with national and regional bodies, including NGOs. For alignment with African partners, PIM is an active participant in the Dublin Process to achieve synchrony between the CAADP institutions and CGIAR. The PIM director serves on the steering committee of the Dublin Process. The centers with strong participation in PIM, particularly CIAT, ICRISAT, ILRI, IFPRI, and ICRAF, have close working relations with host governments and regional bodies and bring these relationships into PIM. PIM draws on the strong country strategy support programs within IFPRI and co-finances their work. PIM holds regular consultations and jointly plans work with major donor agencies and multilateral and regional development banks. These partners use the products of PIM’s work in policy dialogue and the design of programs. Interactions with Other CRPs PIM’s strongest structural links to other Consortium Research Programs are with Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS) on the Global Futures work, Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE) on water issues, and with Agriculture for Nutrition and Health (A4NH) on value chains. PIM provides tools and analytical frameworks that are of general application to all Consortium Research Programs, for example, tools for gender analysis, assessment of value chains, metrics to measure impact and rates of return, and methodologies for impact assessment. PIM’s interaction with other CRPs on value chains is summarized above. How Key Partners Are Using PIM’s Outputs and Outcomes Partners use PIM’s products in a variety of ways. Examples include the following:  The Ministry of Agriculture and the National Meteorological Institute in Uruguay are working with PIM on rainfall and yields in the horticulture sector and on the design of scalable agricultural insurance for smallholder farmers.  The Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research in East and Central Africa (ASARECA) and the West and Central African Council for Agricultural Research and Development (CORAF/WECARD) are working with PIM on tracking adoption of technologies and their performance in the field.  Work with African partners is used to design policy measures to complement increased public spending in agriculture under the CAADP investment programs.  The EU used PIM’s work in analysis of potential changes in biofuel policies. See Annex 5 for a typology of PIM partners and a snapshot of their geographic distribution. F. CAPACITY BUILDING PIM supports capacity building by developing effective tools for analysis, providing them through open access, and offering training in their use. Because the needs for capacity building on policy research in the developing world are enormous and PIM’s ability to respond limited, PIM seeks to be strategic and selective in the activities it supports. Much of the training is in the context of joint research, so that national teams can join with international partners through PIM to undertake specific tasks. Many recipients of training and mentoring are MS and PhD students, and their thesis work pursued in the context of PIM builds long-term capacity. PIM co-finances the training in modeling in Africa under the PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 10 African Growth and Development Policy (AGRODEP) program, through which professionals from 23 African countries have been exposed to advanced modeling techniques and linked through a network. For activities funded primarily through Windows 1-2, 6,793 people from developing countries were trained through PIM, 16% of whom are female. Seventy four graduate students were supervised, of whom 74% from developing countries. Fifty five percent are female students. For activities funded primarily through bilateral support, 10,806 people from developing countries were trained through PIM, 25% of whom are female. The total number of graduate students is 131, of which fifty two percent are female. G. RISK MANAGEMENT PIM faces risks in managing expectations, in administration, and in securing predictable financing. Managing Expectations The PIM program as approved is broad and strong, but also quite fragmented. The management team is working to strengthen internal coherence, and this in some cases entails adjustment in expectations of researchers and encouragement to redefine activities. Expectations of donors for rapid impact attributable directly to policy-oriented research may not be realistic. Expectations will be addressed through dialogue and agreement with the donors on intermediate development outcomes. Researchers and participating centers have expectations for funding under PIM that are not consistent with funds available. This mismatch of expectations and reality has been addressed through lengthy discussions during the budgeting process for 2013. It will undoubtedly resurface for 2014. Administrative Risks CGIAR does not yet have systems in place adequately to support administration of PIM. No tools are available to CRP directors to track expenditures and deliverables within the portfolio as a whole. Directors are dependent on the self-reporting of participants, a mechanism that is not necessarily reliable, timely, or welcomed by those asked to report. PIM management addresses the gap in systems through dialogue with participants. Financial Risks PIM is designed as a long-term program but is funded on an annual basis and faces a high degree of uncertainty about levels and sources of funding. PIM addresses this risk by maintaining regular dialogue with key donors to ensure that they are aware of developments and remain supportive. PIM management is also seeking to develop new sources of support. H. LESSONS LEARNED Reporting indicators should be relevant for program management and informative about progress. PIM considers the indicators in Annex 1 to be a transitional reporting mechanism, soon to be replaced by one recognized as acceptable by the scientists within the system and its donors. PIM is participating fully in the effort to design a coherent set of intermediate development outcomes and related indicators at the CRP level and for the system as a whole. Teams need close oversight and encouragement to maintain a good pace of implementation. PIM undertook significant effort to review the portfolio at the end of 2012 to identify activities experiencing significant delays or difficulties in meeting their stated objectives for the year. The expanded management committee will meet at mid-year in 2013 to assess progress. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 11 Based on lessons learned during the first year of implementation, PIM enters its second year with five management objectives:  Refining the statement of impact: PIM will clarify how policy-oriented work pursued under the program contributes to impact and particularly to the strategic results of the system.  Sustaining momentum and increasing coherence: PIM aims to keep momentum for ongoing multiyear activities and draw related tasks together into a limited number of clusters.  Addressing gaps: PIM plans to initiate activities where gaps in the current portfolio are identified and demand is high.  Maintaining and improving analytical tools: The management team will take stock of the basic tools that PIM can provide to CGIAR and the broader community (models, datasets, methodologies of measurement) and invest in their maintenance, improvement, and open access.  Exploring focus areas: PIM will work with partners and practitioners to identify the key areas of focused work that will form the basis of the cycle of funding to begin in January 2015. I. CGIAR RESEARCH PROGRAM FINANCIAL REPORT Please refer to Annex 3 on CRP Financial Reporting Templates. Nine reports are provided in this section, as follows: 1. Report L101 - CRP Cumulative Financial Summary 2. Report L106 – CRP Annual Funding Summary 3. Report L111 - CRP Annual Finance Plan Summary (by Center, Windows 1 and 2) 4. Report L121 - CRP Financial Report - Expenditure by natural classification (by Center) 5. Report L131 - CRP Themes Report (by Center, and Funding Source) 6. Report L201 - CRP Financial Report - Bilateral Grants (by Center) 7. Report L211 - CRP Partnerships Report 8. Report L401 - CRP Funding Statement, Windows 1 and 2 9. Report L411 - CRP Funding Statement, Window 2 The financial report in excel file format is also being provided. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 12 Annex 1: CRP indicators of progress, with glossary and targets CRPs Indicator Glossary/guidelines for measuring the indicator Deviation 2012 2013 2014 concerned narrative by this (if actual is indicator more than 10% away from target) Target (if Actual Target Target available for 2012) KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA All 1. Number of flagship These are frameworks and concepts that are significant and 0 0 0 5 “products” produced by CRP complete enough to have been highlighted on web pages, publicized through blog stories, press releases and/or policy briefs. They are significant in that they should be likely to change the way stakeholders along the impact pathway allocate resources and/or implement activities. They should be products that change the way these stakeholders think and act. Tools, decision-support tools, guidelines and/or training manuals are not included in this indicator All 2. % of flagship products The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs 0 0 0 80% produced that have explicit supporting indicator #1 must have an explicit focus on women target of women farmers/NRM managers to be counted farmers/NRM managers All 3. % of flagship products Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on 0 0 55% 55% produced that have been gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted assessed for likely gender- disaggregated impact All 4. Number of ”tools” These are significant decision-support tools, guidelines, and/or Under 0 0 1 5 produced by CRP training manuals that are significant and complete enough to have developme been highlighted on web pages, publicized through blog stories, nt in first press releases and/or policy briefs. They are significant in that they cycle. should be likely to change the way stakeholders along the impact Target for pathway allocate resources and/or implement activities 2014: Foresight modelling, geo-spatial mapping, PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 13 WEAI, value chains toolkit, library of SAM’s All 5. % of tools that have an The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs 0 0 60% 60% explicit target of women supporting indicator #4 must have an explicit focus on women farmers farmers/NRM managers to be counted All 6. % of tools assessed for Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on 0 0 55% 55% likely gender-disaggregated gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted impact All 7a. Number of open access 0 12* TBD TBD databases maintained by CRP, funded primarily through W1-2 7b. Number of open access 0 77* TBD TBD databases maintained by CRP, funded primarily through Bilateral All 8a. Total number of users of NA 5,031* NA NA these open access databases, funded primarily through W1-2 All 8b. Total number of users of NA 647,244* NA NA these open access databases, funded primarily through Bilateral All 8c. Number of hits/views/ NA 38,969* NA NA requests coming in through electronic media such as knowledge banks, CRP and institutional home portals, websites, other ICT media; funded primarily through W1-2 All 8c. Number of hits/views/ NA 2,574,043 NA NA requests coming in through * electronic media such as knowledge banks, CRP and PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 14 institutional home portals, websites, other ICT media; funded primarily through Bilateral All 9a. Number of publications NA 54* 100 200 in ISI journals produced by CRP, funded primarily through W1-2 All 9b. Number of publications NA 51* 100 200 in ISI journals produced by CRP, funded primarily through Bilateral 1,2,3, 4, 6 10. Number of strategic NA 16 16 16 value chains analyzed by CRP Notes: * Initial cataloguing (needs to be confirmed). PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 15 CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND INNOVATION PLATFORMS All 13a. Number of trainees in The number of individuals to whom significant knowledge or skills Source: 5688 6000 6000 short-term programs have been imparted through interactions that are intentional, Submissio facilitated by CRP (male), structured, and purposed for imparting knowledge or skills should n by PIM funded primarily through be counted. This includes farmers, ranchers, fishers, and other Focal W1-2 primary sector producers who receive training in a variety of best Points practices in productivity, post-harvest management, linking to markets, etc. It also includes rural entrepreneurs, processors, managers and traders receiving training in application of new technologies, business management, linking to markets, etc., and training to extension specialists, researchers, policymakers and others who are engaged in the food, feed and fiber system and natural resources and water management. Include training on climate risk analysis, adaptation, mitigation, and vulnerability assessments, as it relates to agriculture. Training should include food security, water resources management/IWRM, sustainable agriculture, and climate change resilience. All 13b. Number of trainees in The number of individuals to whom significant knowledge or skills Source: 8095 9000 9000 short-term programs have been imparted through interactions that are intentional, Submissio facilitated by CRP (male), structured, and purposed for imparting knowledge or skills should n by PIM funded primarily through be counted. This includes farmers, ranchers, fishers, and other Focal bilateral primary sector producers who receive training in a variety of best Points practices in productivity, post-harvest management, linking to markets, etc. It also includes rural entrepreneurs, processors, managers and traders receiving training in application of new technologies, business management, linking to markets, etc., and training to extension specialists, researchers, policymakers and others who are engaged in the food, feed and fiber system and natural resources and water management. Include training on climate risk analysis, adaptation, mitigation, and vulnerability assessments, as it relates to agriculture. Training should include food security, water resources management/IWRM, sustainable agriculture, and climate change resilience. All 14a. Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) 1105 1200 1200 short-term programs facilitated by CRP (female), funded primarily through W1-2 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 16 All 14b. Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) 2711 3000 3000 short-term programs facilitated by CRP (female), funded primarily through bilateral All 15a. Number of trainees in The number of people who are currently enrolled in or graduated Source: 33 40 40 long-term programs in the current fiscal year from a bachelor’s, master’s or Ph.D. Submissio facilitated by CRP (male), program or are currently participating in or have completed in the n by PIM funded primarily through current fiscal year a long-term (degree-seeking) advanced training Focal W1-2 program such as a fellowship program or a post-doctoral studies Points program. A person completing one long-term training program in the fiscal year and currently participating in another long-term training program should be counted only once. All 15b. Number of trainees in The number of people who are currently enrolled in or graduated Source: 63 70 70 long-term programs in the current fiscal year from a bachelor’s, master’s or Ph.D. Submissio facilitated by CRP (male), program or are currently participating in or have completed in the n by PIM funded primarily through current fiscal year a long-term (degree-seeking) advanced training Focal bilateral program such as a fellowship program or a post-doctoral studies Points program. A person completing one long-term training program in the fiscal year and currently participating in another long-term training program should be counted only once. All 16a.Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) 41 45 45 long-term programs facilitated by CRP (female), funded primarily through W1-2 All 16b.Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) 68 75 75 long-term programs facilitated by CRP (female), funded primarily through bilateral 1,5,6,7 17. Number of multi- To be counted, a multi-stakeholder platform has to have a clear stakeholder R4D innovation purpose, generally to manage some type of tradeoff/conflict platforms established for the among the different interests of different stakeholders in the targeted agroecosystems by targeted agroecosystems, and inclusive and clear governance the CRPs mechanisms, leading to decisions to manage the variety of perspectives of stakeholders in a manner satisfactory to the whole platform. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 17 TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 18. Number of Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related and NRM- Promising 159 20 20 technologies/NRM practices related technologies and innovations including those that address technologi under research in the CRP climate change adaptation and mitigation. Relevant technologies es list, Nov (Phase I) include but are not limited to: 2012, • Mechanical and physical: New land preparation, harvesting, Global processing, and product handling technologies, including Futures/fo biodegradable packaging resight • Biological: New germplasm (varieties, breeds, etc.) that could be analysis higher-yielding or higher in nutritional content and/or more resilient to climate impacts; affordable food-based nutritional supplementation such as vitamin A-rich sweet potatoes or rice, or high-protein maize, or improved livestock breeds; soil management practices that increase biotic activity and soil organic matter levels; and livestock health services and products such as vaccines; • Chemical: Fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides sustainably and environmentally applied, and soil amendments that increase fertilizer-use efficiencies; • Management and cultural practices: sustainable water management; practices; sustainable land management practices; sustainable fishing practices; Information technology, improved/sustainable agricultural production and marketing practices, increased use of climate information for planning disaster risk strategies in place, climate change mitigation and energy efficiency, and natural resource management practices that increase productivity and/or resiliency to climate change. IPM, ISFM, and PHH as related to agriculture should all be included as improved technologies or management practices. New technologies or management practices under research counted should be only those under research in the current reporting year. Any new technology or management practice under research in a previous year but not under research in the reporting year should not be included. All 19. % of technologies under The papers, web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy See gender 0 TBD TBD research that have an explicit briefs supporting indicator #x must have an explicit focus on strategy target of women farmers women farmers/NRM managers to be counted All 20. % of technologies under Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on See gender 55% 55% PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 18 research that have been gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted strategy; assessed for likely gender- methodolo disaggregated impact gy for assessmen t TBD 1,5,6,7 21 Number of Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of agroecosystems for which cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, CRP has identified feasible 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and approaches for improving Trends, Volume 1) to define these agroecosystems; identify the ecosystem services and for regions if possible establishing positive incentives for farmers to improve ecosystem functions as per the CRP’s recommendations 1,5,6,7 22. Number of people who Indicate the potential number of both women and men will potentially benefit from plans, once finalised, for the scaling up of strategies All, except 23. Number of technologies Under “field testing” means that research has moved from focused 2 /NRM practices field tested development to broader testing and this testing is underway under (phase II) conditions intended to duplicate those encountered by potential users of the new technology. This might be in the actual facilities (fields) of potential users, or it might be in a facility set up to duplicate those conditions. 1,5,6,7 24. Number of Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of agroecosystems for which cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, innovations (technologies, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and policies, practices, Trends, Volume 1) to define these agroecosystems and specify the integrative approaches) and regions where field testing is underway options for improvement at system level have been developed and are being field tested (Phase II) 1,5,6,7 25. % of above innovations/approaches/opti ons that are targeted at decreasing inequality between men and women 1,5,6,7 26. Number of published PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 19 research outputs from CRP utilised in targeted agro- ecosystems All, except 27.Number of In the case of crop research that developed a new variety, e.g., the 2 technologies/NRM practices variety must have passed through any required approval process, released by public and and seed of the new variety should be available for multiplication. private sector partners The technology should have proven benefits and be as ready for globally (phase III) use as it can be as it emerges from the research and testing process. Technologies made available for transfer should be only those made available in the current reporting year. Any technology made available in a previous year should not be included. POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 28. Numbers of Policies/ Number of agricultural enabling environment Ref: 50 34 35 35 Regulations/ Administrative policies/regulations/administrative procedures in the areas of explanator Procedures agricultural resource, food, market standards & regulation, public y memo Analyzed (Stage 1) investment, natural resource or water management and climate from P. change adaptation/mitigation as it relates to agriculture that Sabbagh, underwent the first stage of the policy reform process i.e. analysis October (review of existing policy/regulation/administrative procedure 2012 for and/or proposal of new policy/regulations/administrative methodolo procedures). gy . Please count the highest stage completed during the reporting year – don't double count for the same policy. All 29. Number of policies / ….. ……that underwent the second stage of the policy reform 0 10 10 10 regulations / administrative process. The second stage includes public debate and/or procedures drafted and consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised presented for policy/regulation/administrative procedure. public/stakeholder consultation (Stage 2) All 30. Number of policies / : … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process 10 15 8 8 regulations / administrative (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the procedures presented for policy environment for smallholder-based agriculture.) legislation(Stage 3) All 31. Number of policies / : …underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process 0 NA 7 7 regulations / administrative (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised procedures prepared policy/regulation/administrative procedure by relevant authority). PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 20 passed/approved (Stage 4) All 32. Number of policies / : …completed the policy reform process (implementation of new 5 6 6 6 regulations / administrative or revised policy/regulation/administrative procedure by relevant procedures passed for which authority) implementation has begun (Stage 5) OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND NA All 33. Number of hectares Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the NA under improved technologies application of technologies is on a new or continuing area or management practices as a result of CRP research All 34. Number of farmers and Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the others who have applied application of technologies is on a new or continuing area and new technologies or indicate: management practices as a 34 (a) number of women farmers concerned result of CRP research 34(b) number of male farmers concerned PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 21 Annex 2: Performance indicators for gender mainstreaming with targets defined1 Performance Indicator CRP performance approaches CRP performance meets requirements CRP performance exceeds requirements requirements 1. Gender inequality Sex-disaggregated social data is Sex-disaggregated social data collected and Sex-disaggregated social data collected and used to diagnose targets defined being collected and used to diagnose used to diagnose important gender-related important gender-related constraints in at least one of the important gender-related constraints in at least one of the CRP’s main CRP’s main target populations constraints in at least one of the target populations And CRP’s main target populations And The CRP has defined and collected baseline data on the main The CRP has defined and collected baseline dimensions of gender inequality in the CRP’s main target data on the main dimensions of gender populations relevant to its expected outcomes (IDOs) inequality in the CRP’s main target And populations relevant to its expected CRP targets changes in levels of gender inequality to which outcomes ( IDOs) the CRP is or plans to contribute, with related numbers of men and women beneficiaries in main target populations 2. Institutional architecture - CRP scientists and managers with - CRP scientists and managers with CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in for integration of gender is responsibility for gender in the CRP’s responsibility for gender in the CRP’s the CRP’s outputs are appointed, have written TORS and in place outputs are appointed, have written outputs are appointed, have written TORS funds allocated to support their interaction. TORS. and funds allocated to support their - Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or - Procedures defined to report use of interaction. baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of available diagnostic or baseline - Procedures defined to report use of the gender equality implications of the CRP’s flagship knowledge on gender routinely for available diagnostic or baseline knowledge research products as per the Gender Strategy assessment of the gender equality on gender routinely for assessment of the -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on implications of the CRP’s flagship gender equality implications of the CRP’s integration of gender in research research products as per the Gender flagship research products as per the Gender And Strategy Strategy A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender -CRP M&E system has protocol for -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking analysis tracking progress on integration of progress on integration of gender in And gender in research research The CRP uses feedback provided by its M&E system to And improve its integration of gender into research A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysis 1 This annex is retained and has been used to inform the material presented in section D of the report. No entries have been recorded in this table. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 22 Annex 3: CRP financial reporting templates 1. Report L101 - CRP Cumulative Financial Summary Period 1 January 2011 - 31 December 2012 CRP 2 (a) Cumulative budget per annual financial plans. (b) Actual Expenses - Cumulative (c) Variance - Cumulative Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding Bioversity 970 - 981 - 1,951 970 - 981 - 1,951 - - - - - CIAT 771 - 1,076 - 1,847 717 - 1,076 - 1,794 54 - - - 54 CIP 790 - 1,969 - 2,759 692 - 1,969 - 2,661 98 - - - 98 ICARDA 48 - - - 48 16 - - - 16 32 - - - 32 ICRISAT 1,705 - 4,226 - 5,931 1,589 - 4,226 - 5,815 116 - - - 116 IFPRI 13,430 9,455 42,408 - 65,293 9,086 9,455 42,408 - 60,949 4,344 - - - 4.344 IITA 627 - 1,301 - 1,928 527 - 1,301 - 1,828 100 - - - 100 ILRI 2,230 - 373 - 2,603 1,130 - 373 - 1,503 1,100 - - - 1,100 World 1,079 - 105 196 1,380 646 - 105 196 948 432 - - - 432 Agroforestry World Fish 140 - 595 - 735 140 - 595 - 735 - - - - - Totals for CRP 21,789 9,455 53,034 196 84,474 15,514 9,455 53,034 196 78,197 6,275 - - - 6,275 26% 11% 63% 0% 100% 18% 11% 63% 0% 93% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Notes 1. All figures shown here are in USD 000's 2. For Window 3, Bilateral funding, and Center Funds -- Section (a) is the same as Section (b); that is, Actual Expenses-Cumulative is the same as Cumulative budget per annual financial plans. 3. CIP revised expense has increased by $10K. Figures in the IFPRI audit report are based on prior submission. 4. IFPRI's expense is cumulative (includes 2011 expense) PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 23 2. Report L106 – CRP Annual Funding Summary CRP 2012 Actual Funding Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Bilateral Total funding Funding W1 Donors - ACIAR 481 481 ADB 891 891 African Agri Tech Foundation 36 36 Agri Res Council - Nigeria 72 72 AGRIDEA 200 200 ASARECA 85 85 Australia - 2013 - Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 1,674 4,309 5,893 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), USA (thru IRRI) 47 47 Bioversity 175 175 CAPRi 1 1 CARE 13 13 CGIAR CCAFS 70 70 China 85 85 CIDA (2) (2) CIMMYT 35 35 CIRAPIP 65 65 CIREM/CEPII 105 105 Common Funds for Commodities (CFC) 165 165 Copenhagen Consensus Ctr 13 13 CORAF/WECARD 16 16 Croplife International 374 374 CRS 57 57 Ctr for Econ Policy Res. 65 65 DAI 114 114 Denmark - DFID 557 557 Econ Policy Research Inst 52 52 ECU 116 116 EMBRAPA -1 (1) European Commission 1817 1,817 FAO 289 289 FAO, Zimbabwe 63 63 Ford 114 114 Forum for Agri. Res. - Afri 10 10 George Mason U./USAID 5 5 GIZ 418 418 Global Development Netw 967 967 Grameen Foundation USA 39 39 GTZ 3,362 3,362 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 24 CRP 2012 Actual Funding Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Bilateral Total funding Funding HarvestPlus 16 16 ICAR, India (under NAIP) 230 230 ICRAF 15 15 IDB 569 569 IDRC 93 93 IFAD 1542 1,542 IFAR 10 10 IFPRI 1018 1,018 IITA 3 3 IKP TRUST 329 329 ILO 66 66 ILRI 60 60 ICAR 15 15 Inst. For Financial Mgt. 84 84 Inst. Of Dev Studies 2 2 Int'l Inst. Sustain. Dev. 20 20 Iowa State University, USA (BMGF funding) 109 109 Irish Aid 274 274 IRRI/Gates 209 209 IRRI/USAID 88 88 Italy 79 79 IWMI 126 126 Kickstart Int'l Inc. 61 61 Landbouw-Eon Inst./EC 338 338 LEI/EU 61 61 Liebniz Centre 97 97 MAFFS Sierra Leone 32 32 McKnight Foundation 59 59 Mercy Corps/USAID 94 94 Michigan State University 106 106 MTT AgriFood Research 13 13 Nat. Bureau of Econ. Res. 25 25 National FADAMA Coor. Off 135 135 NEPC 24 24 Netherlands - Netherlands (thru Nedworc Foundation) 130 130 Nigeria 28 28 Nike Foundation 11 11 Norway 123 123 NSF 44 44 OXFAM America-HARO 87 87 Purdue University 121 121 Purdue University/USAID 1 1 SDC 333 333 SIDA 1,064 1,064 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 25 CRP 2012 Actual Funding Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Bilateral Total funding Funding Social Impact, Inc./MCC 128 128 Stanford Univ./Gates 82 82 Stanford University 4 4 Sweden 10 10 Switzerland - Terra Nuova 54 54 The Bureau of Agricultural Research, Philippine s 46 46 The Consortium of International Agricultural Research Centers 8876 8,876 The Intl Labour Office 4 4 The Netherlands 203 203 Tufts University/USAID 81 81 Uganda 21 21 UN University 10 10 UNEP-GEF 325 325 UNICEF 370 370 Unique Forestry/Land Use 27 27 United Nations 23 23 United Nations Foundation 50 50 United Nations University 14 14 Univ. of Colorado 105 105 University of Bonn 53 53 University of Groningen 344 344 University of Oxford 67 67 University of California 27 27 UNOPS 54 54 US Dept of Labor 63 63 USAID 5 8,018 8,023 USAID (thru CNFA) 5 5 USAID (thru World Bank) 982 982 USAID/WB 7,761 9,346 17,107 USAID-EGAT 33 33 USDA 52 52 Various** 6,194 6,194 Various 105 105 Virginia Tech 6 6 Wageningen 10 10 WARDA 29 29 Wellspring Advisors, LLC 273 273 World Bank 1,709 1,709 World Food Program 710 710 Totals for CRP - 8,876 9,454 53,036 71,367 Not es 1. All figures shown here are in USD 000's 2. Amount shown for Window 1 donors is total, as these funds are co-mingled PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 26 3. Amounts shown for Window 2 donors are as per Report L411. 4. Amounts shown for Window 3 donors are as per Report L201 5. Amounts shown for Bilateral funding are as per Report L201 6. World Agroforestry did not submit details on partnerships. To get correct total for bilateral funding, $105K reported by ICRAF is added under “Various”. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 27 3. Report L111 - CRP Annual Finance Plan Summary (by Center, Windows 1 and 2) Period 1 January 2011 - 31 December 2012 CRP 2 (a) Cumulative budget per annual financial plans. (b) Actual Expenses - Cumulative (c) Variance - Cumulative Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding Bioversity 970 - 981 - 1,951 970 - 981 - 1,951 - - - - - CIAT 771 - 1,077 - 1,848 717 - 1,077 - 1,794 54 - - - 54 CIP 790 - 1,969 - 2,759 692 - 1,969 - 2,661 98 - - - 98 ICARDA 48 - - - 48 16 - - - 16 32 - - - 32 ICRISAT 1,705 - 4,226 - 5,931 1,589 - 4,226 - 5,815 116 - - - 116 IFPRI 13,430 9,455 42,408 - 65,293 8,876 9,455 42,408 - 60,739 4,554 - - - 4,554 IITA 627 - 1,301 - 1,928 527 - 1,301 - 1,828 100 - - - 100 ILRI 2,230 - 373 - 2,603 1,130 - 373 - 1,503 1,100 - - - 1,100 World 1,079 - 105 196 1,380 646 - 105 196 948 432 - - - 432 Agroforestry World Fish 140 - 595 - 735 140 - 595 - 735 - - - - - Totals for CRP 21,789 9,455 53,035 196 84,475 15,304 9,455 53,035 196 77,990 6,485 - - - 6.485 25% 11% 63% 0% 100% 18% 11% 63% 0% 92% 100% 0% 0% 0% 100% Note 1. All figures shown here are in USD 000's 2. For Window 3, Bilateral funding, and Center funds -- Section (a) is the same as Section (b); that is, Actual Expenses-Cumulative is the same as Cumulative budget per annual financial plans. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 28 4. Report L121 - CRP Financial Report - Expenditure by natural classification (by Center) Period 1 January 2011 - 31 December 2012 Actual Exp enses - Annual Budget This Year Unspent Budget Windows 1 Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total and 2 3 funding Funds 1 and 2 3 funding Funds 1 and 2 3 funding Funds Funds Funds Funds Total CRP Personnel 9,363 2,432 16,191 101 28,087 6,479 2,432 16,191 101 25,204 -2,884 0 0 0 -2,884 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 126 0 2,093 0 2,219 84 0 2,093 0 2,177 -42 0 0 0 -42 Collaborator Costs - Partners 738 2,949 15,370 0 19,507 504 2,949 15,370 0 18,823 -234 0 0 0 -234 Supplies and Services 7,647 2,043 8,970 43 18,703 5,298 2,043 8,970 43 16,353 -2,350 0 0 0 -2,350 Operational Travel 725 703 3,353 23 4,804 471 703 3,353 23 4,550 -254 0 0 0 -254 Depreciation 194 104 918 3 1,219 128 104 918 3 1,154 -65 0 0 0 -65 Sub-total of Direct Costs 18,792 8,231 46,896 170 74,089 12,964 8,231 46,896 170 68,260 -5,829 0 0 0 -5,829 Indirect Costs 3,318 1,224 6,138 26 10,706 2,339 1,224 6,138 26 9,727 -979 0 0 0 -979 Total - all Costs 22,110 9,455 53,034 196 84,795 15,303 9,455 53,034 196 77,987 -6,808 0 0 0 -6,808 Amounts for each participating center below: Bioversity International Personnel 526 0 220 0 746 526 0 220 0 746 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 20 0 415 0 435 20 0 415 0 435 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies and Services 261 0 211 0 472 261 0 211 0 472 0 0 0 0 0 Operational Travel 8 0 68 0 76 8 0 68 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 815 0 914 0 1729 815 0 914 0 1,729 0 0 0 0 0 Indirect Costs 155 0 67 0 222 155 0 67 0 222 0 0 0 0 0 Total - all Costs 970 0 981 0 1951 970 0 981 0 1,951 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 29 CIAT Personnel 426 0 227 0 654 396 0 227 0 623 -30 0 0 0 -30 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 0 0 375 0 375 0 0 375 0 375 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies and Services 212 0 314 0 526 197 0 314 0 511 -15 0 0 0 -15 Operational Travel 15 0 59 0 74 14 0 59 0 73 -1 0 0 0 -1 Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 654 0 975 0 1629 607 0 975 0 1,582 -46 0 0 0 -46 Indirect Costs 118 0 102 0 220 109 0 102 0 211 -8 0 0 0 -8 Total - all Costs 771 0 1077 0 1848 717 0 1,077 0 1,794 -55 0 0 0 -55 CIP Personnel 302 0 323 0 626 265 0 323 0 588 -37 0 0 0 -37 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 0 0 335 0 335 0 0 335 0 335 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies and Services 202 0 890 0 1,092 177 0 890 0 1,067 -25 0 0 0 -25 Operational Travel 7 0 253 0 260 6 0 253 0 259 -1 0 0 0 -1 Depreciation 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 512 0 1,825 0 2,337 448 0 1,825 0 2,274 -63 0 0 0 -63 Indirect Costs 278 0 143 0 421 244 0 143 0 387 -34 0 0 0 -34 Total - all Costs 790 0 1,968 0 2,758 692 0 1,968 0 2,661 -98 0 0 0 -98 ICARDA Personnel 31 0 0 0 31 10 0 0 0 10 -21 0 0 0 -21 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies and Services 3 0 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 1 -2 0 0 0 -2 Operational Travel 6 0 0 0 6 2 0 0 0 2 -4 0 0 0 -4 Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 40 0 0 0 40 13 0 0 0 13 -27 0 0 0 -27 Indirect Costs 8 0 0 0 8 3 0 0 0 3 -5 0 0 0 -5 Total - all Costs 48 0 0 0 48 16 0 0 0 16 -33 0 0 0 -33 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 30 ICRISAT Personnel 1,037 0 1,065 0 2,102 813 0 1,065 0 1,878 -224 0 0 0 -224 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 6 0 1,379 0 1,385 5 0 1,379 0 1,384 -1 0 0 0 -1 Supplies and Services 582 0 841 0 1,423 456 0 841 0 1,297 -126 0 0 0 -126 Operational Travel 52 0 226 0 278 41 0 226 0 267 -11 0 0 0 -11 Depreciation 0 0 311 0 311 0 0 311 0 311 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 1,678 0 3,822 0 5,500 1,315 0 3,822 0 5,137 -363 0 0 0 -363 Indirect Costs 350 0 404 0 754 274 0 404 0 678 -76 0 0 0 -76 Total - all Costs 2,027 0 4,226 0 6,253 1,589 0 4,226 0 5,815 -438 0 0 0 -438 IFPRI Personnel 4,489 2,432 13,161 0 20,082 2,967 2,432 13,161 0 18,560 -1,522 0 0 0 -1,522 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 123 0 2,086 0 2,209 81 0 2,086 0 2,167 -42 0 0 0 -42 Collaborator Costs - Partners 640 2,949 12,621 0 16,210 423 2,949 12,621 0 15,993 -217 0 0 0 -217 Supplies and Services 5,769 2,043 6,348 0 14,160 3,813 2,043 6,348 0 12,204 -1,956 0 0 0 -1,956 Operational Travel 402 703 2,527 0 3,632 266 703 2,527 0 3,496 -136 0 0 0 -136 Depreciation 192 104 563 0 859 127 104 563 0 794 -65 0 0 0 -65 Sub-total of Direct Costs 11,616 8,231 37,306 0 57,153 7,677 8,231 37,306 0 53,214 -3,939 0 0 0 -3,939 Indirect Costs 1,814 1,224 5,102 0 8,140 1,199 1,224 5,102 0 7,525 -615 0 0 0 -615 Total - all Costs 13,430 9,455 42,408 0 65,293 8,876 9,455 42,408 0 60,739 -4,554 0 0 0 -4,554 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 31 IITA Personnel 278 0 638 0 916 234 0 638 0 872 -44 0 0 0 -44 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 4 0 7 0 11 3 0 7 0 10 -1 0 0 0 -1 Collaborator Costs - Partners 55 0 67 0 122 46 0 67 0 113 -9 0 0 0 -9 Supplies and Services 177 0 254 0 431 149 0 254 0 403 -28 0 0 0 -28 Operational Travel 19 0 126 0 145 16 0 126 0 142 -3 0 0 0 -3 Depreciation 1 0 18 0 19 1 0 18 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 534 0 1,110 0 1,644 449 0 1,110 0 1,559 -85 0 0 0 -85 Indirect Costs 93 0 191 0 284 78 0 191 0 269 -15 0 0 0 -15 Total - all Costs 627 0 1,301 0 1,928 527 0 1,301 0 1,828 -100 0 0 0 -100 ILRI Personnel 1,404 0 188 0 1,592 712 0 188 0 900 -692 0 0 0 -692 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies and Services 365 0 74 0 439 185 0 74 0 259 -180 0 0 0 -180 Operational Travel 117 0 51 0 167 59 0 51 0 110 -58 0 0 0 -58 Depreciation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 1,886 0 326 0 2,213 956 0 326 0 1,283 -930 0 0 0 -930 Indirect Costs 344 0 46 0 390 174 0 46 0 221 -169 0 0 0 -169 Total - all Costs 2,230 0 373 0 2,603 1,130 0 373 0 1,503 -1,100 0 0 0 -1,100 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 32 World Agroforestry Personnel 780 0 81 101 962 467 0 81 101 649 -312 0 0 0 -313 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 17 0 0 0 17 10 0 0 0 10 -7 0 0 0 -7 Supplies and Services 43 0 3 43 89 26 0 3 43 72 -17 0 0 0 -17 Operational Travel 99 0 7 23 129 59 0 7 23 89 -39 0 0 0 -40 Depreciation 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 939 0 91 170 1,198 562 0 91 170 823 -375 0 0 0 -375 Indirect Costs 140 0 14 26 180 84 0 14 26 124 -56 0 0 0 -56 Total - all Costs 1,079 0 105 196 1,378 646 0 105 196 947 -431 0 0 0 -431 World Fish Personnel 89 0 288 0 377 89 0 288 0 377 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - CGIAR Centers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Collaborator Costs - Partners 0 0 164 0 164 0 0 164 0 164 0 0 0 0 0 Supplies and Services 32 0 35 0 67 32 0 35 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 Operational Travel 0 0 37 0 37 0 0 37 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 Depreciation 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total of Direct Costs 121 0 526 0 647 121 0 526 0 647 0 0 0 0 0 Indirect Costs 19 0 69 0 87 19 0 69 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 Total - all Costs 140 0 595 0 735 140 0 595 0 734 0 0 0 0 0 1. All figures shown here are in USD 00 0's 2. Totals within this report must agree with amounts reported in L111. 3. PIM has no annual budget. To get the annual budget, the 2012 PPA amount was spread proportionally. 4. For Window 3, Bilateral funding, and Center funds -- The Annual Budget section is the same as Actual expenses-this year. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 33 5. Report L131 - CRP Themes Report (by Center and Funding Source) Period 1 January 2012 - 31 December 2012 Annual Budget Actual Expenses this Year Unspent Budget Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Windows Window 3 Bilateral Center Total Windows Window Bilateral Center Total 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 funding funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding funds Funding CRP Report - by Themes Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 12,393 8,920 40,456 196 61,965 8,672 8,920 40,456 196 58,244 3,721 0 0 0 3,721 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 2,222 22 5,322 0 7,566 1,506 22 5,322 0 6,850 716 0 0 0 716 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 4,984 513 6,748 0 12,245 3,430 513 6,748 0 10,691 1,554 0 0 0 1,554 producers to markets Gender Strategies 308 0 509 0 817 236 0 509 0 745 72 0 0 0 72 CRP Management/Coordination 2,206 0 0 0 2,206 1,458 0 0 0 1,458 748 0 0 0 748 Totals for CRP 22,112 9,455 53,035 196 84,798 15,302 9,455 53,035 196 77,989 6,810 0 0 0 6,810 Amounts for each participating center below: Bioversity International Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 525 0 551 0 1,076 525 0 551 0 1,076 0 0 0 0 0 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 232 0 60 0 292 232 0 60 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 213 0 370 0 583 213 0 370 0 583 0 0 0 0 0 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 970 0 981 0 1,951 970 0 981 0 1951 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 34 CIAT Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 219 0 230 0 449 204 0 230 0 434 16 0 0 0 16 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 552 0 848 0 1,400 513 0 848 0 1,361 39 0 0 0 39 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 771 0 1,078 0 1,849 717 0 1,078 0 1,794 55 0 0 0 55 CIP Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 406 0 466 0 872 356 0 466 0 822 50 0 0 0 50 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 384 0 1,503 0 1,887 336 0 1,503 0 1,839 48 0 0 0 48 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 790 0 1,969 0 2,759 692 0 1,969 0 2,661 98 0 0 0 98 ICARDA Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 48 0 0 0 48 16 0 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 48 0 0 0 48 16 0 0 0 16 33 0 0 0 33 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 35 ICRISAT Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 1,340 0 2,283 0 3,623 1,050 0 2,283 0 3,333 290 0 0 0 290 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 424 0 1,717 0 2,141 332 0 1,717 0 2,049 92 0 0 0 92 producers to markets Gender Strategies 264 0 226 0 490 207 0 226 0 433 57 0 0 0 57 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 2,027 0 4,226 0 6,253 1,589 0 4,226 0 5,815 438 0 0 0 438 IFPRI Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 8,874 8,920 35,929 0 53,723 5,865 8,920 35,929 0 50,714 3,009 0 0 0 3,009 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 1,108 22 4,295 0 5,425 732 22 4,295 0 5,049 376 0 0 0 376 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 1,198 513 1,901 0 3,612 792 513 1,901 0 3,206 406 0 0 0 406 producers to markets Gender Strategies 44 0 283 0 327 29 0 283 0 312 15 0 0 0 15 CRP Management/Coordination 2,206 0 0 0 2,206 1,458 0 0 0 1,458 748 0 0 0 748 Total – all Costs 13,430 9,455 42,408 0 65,293 8,876 9,455 42,408 0 60,739 4,554 0 0 0 4,554 IITA Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 289 0 892 0 1,181 243 0 892 0 1,135 46 0 0 0 46 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 338 0 409 0 747 284 0 409 0 693 54 0 0 0 54 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 627 0 1,301 0 1,928 527 0 1,301 0 1,828 100 0 0 0 100 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 36 ILRI Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 460 0 373 0 833 233 0 373 0 606 227 0 0 0 227 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 1,770 0 0 0 1,770 897 0 0 0 897 873 0 0 0 873 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 2,230 0 373 0 2,603 1,130 0 373 0 1,503 1,100 0 0 0 1,100 World Agroforestry Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 691 0 105 196 992 414 0 105 196 715 277 0 0 0 277 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 282 0 0 0 282 169 0 0 0 169 113 0 0 0 113 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 105 0 0 0 105 63 0 0 0 63 42 0 0 0 42 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 1,079 0 105 196 1,380 646 0 105 196 947 433 0 0 0 433 World Fish Theme 1: Foresight & strategic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 scenarios Theme 2: Inclusive governance 140 0 595 0 735 140 0 595 0 734 0 0 0 0 0 and institutions Theme 3: Linking small 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 producers to markets Gender Strategies 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CRP Management/Coordination 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total – all Costs 140 0 595 0 735 140 0 595 0 734 0 0 0 0 0 1. All figures shown here are in USD 000's 2. Totals within this report must agree with amounts reported in L111. 3. PIM has no annual budget. To get the annual budget, the 2012 PPA amount was spread proportionally. 4. For Window 3, Bilateral funding, and Center funds -- The Annual Budget section is the same as Actual expenses-this year. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 37 6. Report L201 - CRP Financial Report - Bilateral Grants (by Center) CRP 2 Period 1 January 2012 - 31 December 2012 Expenditure Annual Budget Actual Expenses this Year Variance Totals for CRP Window 3 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 1,674 1,674 0 Indian Council of Agr Res 15 15 0 USAID 5 5 0 USAID/WB 7,761 7,761 0 Sub-total 9,454 9,454 0 Bilateral ACIAR 481 481 0 ADB 891 891 0 African Agri Tech Foundation 36 36 0 Agri Res Council - Nigeria 72 72 0 AGRIDEA 200 200 0 ASARECA 85 85 0 Australia - 2013 - 0 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 4,309 4,309 0 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), USA 47 47 0 (thru IRRI) Bioversity 175 175 0 CAPRi 1 1 0 CARE 13 13 0 CGIAR CCAFS 70 70 0 China 97 97 0 CIDA (2) (2) 0 CIMMYT 35 35 0 CIRAPIP 65 65 0 CIREM/CEPII 105 105 0 Common Funds for Commodities (CFC) 165 165 0 Copenhagen Consensus Ctr 13 13 0 CORAF/WECARD 16 16 0 Croplife International 374 374 0 CRS 57 57 0 Ctr for Econ Policy Res. 65 65 0 DAI 114 114 0 Denmark - 0 DFID 557 557 0 Econ Policy Research Inst 52 52 0 ECU 116 116 0 EMBRAPA (1) -1 0 European Commission 1,817 1817 0 FAO 289 289 0 FAO, Zimbabwe 63 63 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 38 Ford 114 114 0 Forum for Agri. Res. - Afri 10 10 0 George Mason U./USAID 5 5 0 GIZ 418 418 0 Global Development Netw 967 967 0 Grameen Foundation USA 39 39 0 GTZ 3,362 3,362 0 HarvestPlus 16 16 0 ICAR, India (under NAIP) 230 230 0 ICRAF 15 15 0 IDB 569 569 0 IDRC 93 93 0 IFAD 1,542 1542 0 IFAR 10 10 0 IFPRI 1,018 1018 0 IITA 3 3 0 IKP TRUST 329 329 0 ILO 66 66 0 ILRI 60 60 0 ICAR - 0 Inst. For Financial Mgt. 84 84 0 Inst. Of Dev Studies 2 2 0 Int'l Inst. Sustain. Dev. 20 20 0 Iowa State University, USA (BMGF funding) 109 109 0 Irish Aid 274 274 0 IRRI/Gates 209 209 0 IRRI/USAID 88 88 0 Italy 79 79 0 IWMI 126 126 0 Kickstart Int'l Inc. 61 61 0 Landbouw-Eon Inst./EC 338 338 0 LEI/EU 61 61 0 Liebniz Centre 97 97 0 MAFFS Sierra Leone 32 32 0 McKnight Foundation 59 59 0 Mercy Corps/USAID 94 94 0 Michigan State University 106 106 0 MTT AgriFood Research 13 13 0 Nat. Bureau of Econ. Res. 25 25 0 National FADAMA Coor. Off 135 135 0 NEPC 24 24 0 Netherlands - 0 Netherlands (thru Nedworc Foundation) 130 130 0 Nigeria 28 28 0 Nike Foundation 11 11 0 Norway 123 123 0 NSF 44 44 0 OXFAM America-HARO 87 87 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 39 Purdue University 121 121 0 Purdue University/USAID 1 1 0 SDC 333 333 0 SIDA 1,064 1,064 0 Social Impact, Inc./MCC 128 128 0 Stanford University 4 4 0 Stanford Univ./Gates 82 82 0 Sweden 10 10 0 Switzerland - 0 Terra Nuova 54 54 0 The Bureau of Agricultural Research, Philippines 46 46 0 The Intl Labour Office 4 4 0 The Netherlands 203 203 0 Tufts University/USAID 81 81 0 Uganda 21 21 0 UN University 10 10 0 UNEP-GEF 325 325 0 UNICEF 370 370 0 Unique Forestry/Land Use 27 27 0 United Nations 23 23 0 United Nations Foundation 50 50 0 United Nations University 14 14 0 Univ. of Colorado 105 105 0 University of Bonn 53 53 0 University of Groningen 344 344 0 University of Oxford 67 67 0 Universtiy of California 27 27 0 UNOPS 54 54 0 US Dept of Labor 63 63 0 USAID 8,018 8,018 0 USAID - 2012 - 0 USAID (thru CNFA) 5 5 0 USAID (thru World Bank) 982 982 0 USAID/WB 9,346 9,346 0 USAID-EGAT 33 33 0 USDA 52 52 0 Various** 6,299 6,299 0 Virginia Tech 6 6 W1 Donors - 0 Wageningen 10 10 0 WARDA 29 29 0 Wellspring Advisors, LLC 273 273 0 WESTAT/USAID 178 178 0 World Bank 1,709 1,709 0 World Food Program 710 710 0 Sub-total 53,036 53,036 - Totals for CRP 62,491 62,491 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 40 Bilateral Grants for each participating center below: Bioversity Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral SDC (Switzerland) 0 0 0 The Netherlands 100 100 0 GTZ (Germany) 437 437 0 CAPRi 1 1 0 McKnight Foundation 59 59 0 UNEP-GEF 325 325 0 FAO 59 59 0 Sub-total 981 981 0 Totals for CRP 981 981 0 CIAT Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral Ford 114 114 0 SDC 333 333 0 CRS 57 57 0 IFAD 278 278 0 Various 296 296 0 Sub-total 1078 1078 0 Totals for CRP 1078 1078 0 CIP Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral Association for Strengthening Agricultural Research 85 85 0 in Africa - ASARECA CGIAR Research Program on Climate change 70 70 0 Agriculture and Food Security Australian Centre for International Agriculture 8 8 0 Research (ACIAR) IFAD 443 443 0 EC 1232 1,232 0 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 131 131 0 Sub-total 1,968 1,968 0 Totals for CRP 1,968 1,968 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 41 ICARDA Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral 0 0 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Totals for CRP 0 0 0 ICRISAT Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral ICAR, India (under NAIP) 230 230 0 Bioversity International 79 79 0 IFPRI 433 433 0 WARDA 29 29 0 Asian Development Bank 139 139 0 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), USA 1934 1,934 0 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF), USA 47 47 0 (thru IRRI) IOWA State University, USA (BMGF funding) 109 109 0 FAO, Zimbabwe 63 63 0 USAID (thru World Bank) 496 496 0 The Bureau of Agricultural Research, Philippines 46 46 0 Netherlands (thru Nedworc Foundation) 130 130 0 USAID (thru World Bank) 486 486 0 USAID (thru CNFA) 5 5 0 Sub-total 4,226 4,226 0 Totals for CRP 4,226 4,226 0 IFPRI Window 3 GATES FOUNDATION 1,674 1,674 0 INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGR RES 15 15 0 USAID 5 5 0 USAID/WB 7,761 7,761 0 Sub-total 9,454 9,454 0 Bilateral ACIAR 473 473 0 ADB 752 752 0 AFRICAN AGRI TECH FOUNDAT 36 36 0 AGRI RES COUNCIL-NIGERIA 72 72 0 AGRIDEA 200 200 0 CARE 13 13 0 CHEMONICS/USAID 0 0 0 CHINA 97 97 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 42 CIDA -2 (2) 0 CIMMYT 35 35 0 CIREM/CEPII 105 105 0 COPENHAGEN CONSENSUS CTR 13 13 0 CORAF/WECARD 6 6 0 CROPLIFE INTERNATIONAL 374 374 0 CTR FOR ECON POLICY RES. 65 65 0 DAI 114 114 0 DFID 557 557 0 ECON POLICY RESEARCH INST 52 52 0 EMBRAPA -1 (1) 0 EUROPEAN COMMISSION 586 586 0 FAO 194 194 0 FORUM FOR AGRI. RES.-AFRI 10 10 0 GATES FOUNDATION 2244 2,244 0 GEORGE MASON U./USAID 5 5 0 GIZ 139 139 0 GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT NETWOR 967 967 0 GRAMEEN FOUNDATION USA 39 39 0 GTZ 2925 2,925 0 HARVESTPLUS 16 16 0 ICRAF 13 13 0 IDB 569 569 0 IDRC 93 93 0 IFAD 821 821 0 IFAR 10 10 0 IITA 3 3 0 IKP TRUST 329 329 0 ILO 66 66 0 ILRI 8 8 0 INST. FOR FINANCIAL MGT. 84 84 0 INST. OF DEV STUDIES 2 2 0 INT'L INST. SUSTAIN. DEV. 20 20 0 IRISH AID 274 274 0 IRRI/GATES 209 209 0 IRRI/USAID 88 88 0 ITALY 79 79 0 IWMI 126 126 0 JICA 0 0 0 KICKSTART INT'L INC. 61 61 0 LANDBOUW-EON INST./EC 338 338 0 LEI/EU 61 61 0 LEIBNIZ CENTRE 97 97 0 MERCY CORPS/USAID 94 94 0 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY 106 106 0 MTT AGRIFOOD RESEARCH 13 13 0 NAT. BUREAU OF ECON. RES. 25 25 0 NATIONAL FADAMA COOR. OFF 135 135 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 43 NIKE FOUNDATION 11 11 0 NORWAY 123 123 0 NSF 44 44 0 OXFAM AMERICA-HARO 87 87 0 PURDUE UNIVERSITY/USAID 1 1 0 SIDA 1064 1,064 0 SOCIAL IMPACT, INC./MCC 128 128 0 STANFORD UNIV./GATES 82 82 0 STANFORD UNIVERSITY 4 4 0 SWEDEN 10 10 0 THE INTL LABOUR OFFICE 4 4 0 TUFTS UNIVERSITY/USAID 81 81 0 UGANDA 21 21 0 UN UNIVERSITY 10 10 0 UNICEF 370 370 0 UNIQUE FORESTRY/LAND USE 27 27 0 UNITED NATIONS 23 23 0 UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION 50 50 0 UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY 14 14 0 UNIV. OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 0 UNIV. OF COLORADO 105 105 0 UNIVERSITY OF BONN 53 53 0 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA 27 27 0 UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN 344 344 0 UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD 67 67 0 UNOPS 54 54 0 US DEPT OF LABOR 63 63 0 USAID 7753 7,753 0 USAID/WB 9346 9,346 0 USDA 52 52 0 VARIOUS 5898 5,898 0 VIRGINIA TECH 6 6 0 WAGENINGEN 10 10 0 WELLSPRING ADVISORS, LLC 273 273 0 WESTAT/USAID 178 178 0 WORLD BANK 1507 1,507 0 WORLD FOOD PROGRAM 710 710 0 Sub-total 42,407 42,407 0 Totals for CRP 51,861 51,861 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 44 IITA Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral Common Funds for Commodities (CFC) 165 165 0 Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) 36 36 0 CIRAPIP 65 65 0 USAID 65 65 0 ILRI 52 52 0 Nigeria 28 28 0 IFPRI 469 469 0 Bioversity 96 96 0 CORAF/WECARD 10 10 0 The Netherlands 103 103 0 USAID-EGAT 33 33 0 PURDUE University 121 121 0 MAFFS Sierra Leone 32 32 0 NEPC 24 24 0 ICRAF 2 2 0 1,301 1,301 0 Totals for CRP 1,301 1,301 0 ILRI Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral Terra Nuova 54 54 0 IFPRI 116 116 0 World Bank 202 202 0 373 373 0 Totals for CRP 373 373 0 World Agroforestry Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral Various** 0 105 105 Sub-total 0 105 105 Totals for CRP 0 105 105 World Fish Window 3 0 Sub-total 0 0 0 Bilateral PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 45 GIZ 279 279 0 USAID 200 200 0 ECU 116 116 0 Sub-total 595 595 0 Totals for CRP 595 595 0 Notes 1. All figures shown here are in USD 000's 2. Totals within this report must agree with amounts reported in L111. 3. Annual budget for bilateral is not available at the time of reporting. Assume Annual budget is Actual expense this year. 4. World Agroforestry did not submit details on bilateral funders. To get correct total for bilateral funding, $105K reported by ICRAF is added under "Various". PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 46 7. Report L211 - CRP Partnerships Report Annual Unspent Budget Actual Expenses - This Year Budget Windows Window Bilateral Center Total Wind Window Bilateral Center Total Windo w Window Bilateral Center Total 1 and 2 3 funding Funds ows 1 3 funding Funds s 1 and 2 3 funding Funds Institute Country and 2 Bioversity Malaysian Agricultural Research Malaysia 0 0 48 0 48 0 0 48 0 48 0 0 0 0 0 and Development Institute (MARDI) Department of Agriculture Thailand 0 0 67 0 67 0 0 67 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 (DoA) Indian Council of Agricultural India 0 0 91 0 91 0 0 91 0 91 0 0 0 0 0 Research (ICAR) Universidad Nacional Agraria La Peru 0 0 (5) 0 (5) 0 0 (5) 0 (5) 0 0 0 0 0 Molina (UNALM) (1) Instituto de Tecnologia de Bolivia 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Alimentos (ITA) Hohenheim University Germany 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Centro de Investigaciones Bolivia 0 0 27 0 27 0 0 27 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 Fitoecogeneticas Pairumani (CIFP) Asociacion Centro de Peru 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Investigacion y Desarrollo Rural Amazonico (CIDRA) Wuppertal University Germany 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 60 0 60 0 0 0 0 0 Agro Export Topara S.A.C. Peru 0 0 22 0 22 0 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 Instituto Nacional de Spain 0 0 31 0 31 0 0 31 0 31 0 0 0 0 0 Investigaciones Agrarias (INIA) Fundacion PROINPA Bolivia 12 0 64 0 76 12 0 64 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 Université catholique de Belgium 3 0 0 0 3 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Louvain USDA/Agricultural Research USA 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Service Sub-total for center 20 0 415 0 435 20 0 415 0 435 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 47 CIAT NARS LAOS 0 0 103 0 103 0 0 103 0 103 0 0 0 0 0 CRIG - The Cocoa Research Ghana 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 Institute of Ghana SFL - Sustainable Food United Stated 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Laboratory The AgroEco Lovis Bolk Institute Netherlands 0 0 38 0 38 0 0 38 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 Organizaciones Colombia/ 0 0 104 0 104 0 0 104 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 Afrodesendientes Perú/Brasil Fundación ACUA Colombia 0 0 112 0 112 0 0 112 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 0 0 375 0 375 0 0 375 0 375 0 0 0 0 0 CIP ADERSPERU Peru 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 ALTAGRO Bolivia 0 0 22 0 22 0 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 CAPAC PERU Peru 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 CARE PERU Peru 0 0 34 0 34 0 0 34 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 CORPOINIAP Ecuador 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 CRS Rwanda Rwanda 0 0 33 0 33 0 0 33 0 33 0 0 0 0 0 FUNDACION PROINPA Bolivia 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 IINSAD Bolivia 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 Instituto de Investigacion Nutricional Peru 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 OFIAGRO Ecuador 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 12 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 PMA BOLIVIA Bolivia 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 PRISMA Peru 0 0 35 0 35 0 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 RAB Rwanda 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 RIMISP Ecuador 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 SINA Rwanda 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 VISION MUNDIAL BOLIVIA Bolivia 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 VISION MUNDIAL ECUADOR Ecuador 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 11 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 0 0 334 0 334 0 0 334 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 48 ICARDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ICRISAT Foretell Business Solutions (P)Limited India 5 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 BARC Bangladesh 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 VAAS Vietnam 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 DOA Thailand 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 SARI Tanzania 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 IRRI Philippines 0 0 494 0 494 0 0 494 0 494 0 0 0 0 0 NCAP India 0 0 334 0 334 0 0 334 0 334 0 0 0 0 0 WIFIN Technologies Pvt Ltd India 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 IFDC Mozambique 0 0 463 0 463 0 0 463 0 463 0 0 0 0 0 ZASTA Zambia 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 21 0 21 0 0 0 0 0 ZCC Zona Mozambique 0 0 49 0 49 0 0 49 0 49 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 5 0 1,379 0 1,384 5 0 1,379 0 1,384 0 0 0 0 0 IFPRI LAND EQUITY INTERNATIONAL AUSTRALIA 0 0 135 0 135 0 0 0 0 0 135 135 BANGLADESH AGRICULTURAL BANGLADESH 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 BANGLADESH INSTITUTE (BIDS) BANGLADESH 0 0 140 0 140 0 0 0 0 0 140 140 BANGLADESH RURAL (BRAC) BANGLADESH 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 15 15 BSERT-BANGLADESH BANGLADESH 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 CASEED BANGLADESH 0 0 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 0 35 35 DATA ANALYSIS & TECH ASST BANGLADESH 0 0 863 0 863 0 0 0 0 0 863 863 BARC BANGLADESH 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 BBS BANGLADESH 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 49 UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE BELGIUM 0 0 15 0 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT NATIONAL DE BENIN 0 4 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT OF AGRICULTURAL RES. BOTSWANA 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 BURKINA ENVIRONMENTAL, AGRI- FASO 0 15 0 0 15 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 BURKINA INSTITUT DE L'ENVIRONMENT FASO 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 BURKINA UFR SCIENCE ECONOMIQUES FASO 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 ISABU BURUNDI 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 MINISTERE DELA RECHERECHE CAMEROON 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 71 DATALYZE CONSULTING CORP. CANADA 71 0 0 0 71 71 0 0 0 0 0 ENGINEERS WITHOUT CANADA 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITE LAVAL CANADA 0 0 14 0 14 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT NATIONAL DELA CANADA 0 0 12 0 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CAPE VERDE 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 INST TCHADIEN DE RECHERCH CHAD 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 CENTER FOR CHINESE CHINA 0 0 22 0 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT CHINA 17 0 0 0 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 RESEARCH CENTRE FOR CHINA 3 0 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CTR EGYPT 0 0 14 0 14 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 RESEARCH & PLANNING, SA EL SALVADOR 0 0 33 0 33 33 33 0 0 0 0 0 AFRICAN UNION COMMISSION ETHIOPIA 0 0 150 0 150 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 BUUSAA GONOFAA MICROFIN ETHIOPIA 4 0 28 0 32 4 28 32 0 0 0 0 0 ETHIOPIAN DEV. RES. INST. ETHIOPIA 0 0 541 0 541 541 541 0 0 0 0 0 ETHIOPIAN INSTITUTE OF ETHIOPIA 0 3 0 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 DESSALEW AS.AGRIC.CO ETHIOPIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DESSALEW AS.AGRIC.COOP.LI ETHIOPIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HAILU N ARGI.COOPRA.LISTI ETHIOPIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MENGISTU A. AGR. COOP LIS ETHIOPIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SEMERE KA.AGRI.COOP.LISTI ETHIOPIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TEFERA AN AGRI.COOP.LISTI ETHIOPIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL FRANCE (ASTI) 0 158 28 0 185 158 28 185 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 50 FOUNDATION POUR L' AGRIC FRANCE 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 GROUPE DE RECHERCHE ET FRANCE 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT DE RECHERCHES GABON 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 NATL AGRIC RESEARCH INST. GAMBIA 0 6 2 0 7 6 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING GEORGIA 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 GEORG-AUGUST UNIVERSITY GERMANY 0 0 73 0 73 73 73 0 0 0 0 0 GIGA GERMAN INSTITUTE GERMANY 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 KIEL INSTITUTE FOR THE GERMANY 5 0 14 0 19 5 14 19 0 0 0 0 0 POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR GERMANY 0 0 71 0 71 71 71 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM GERMANY 0 0 64 0 64 64 64 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF BONN GERMANY 0 0 92 0 92 92 92 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF KIEL GERMANY 0 0 115 0 115 115 115 0 0 0 0 0 COLANDEF GHANA 0 10 3 0 13 10 3 13 0 0 0 0 0 COUNCIL FOR SCIENTIFIC & GHANA 0 6 0 0 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE GHANA 0 27 0 0 27 27 27 0 0 0 0 0 ESOKO LIMITED GHANA 0 0 53 0 53 53 53 0 0 0 0 0 GHANA INST OF MGT PUBLIC GHANA 0 52 0 0 52 52 52 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTE OF STATISTICAL, GHANA 0 7 22 0 29 7 22 29 0 0 0 0 0 MINISTRY OF FOOD AND GHANA 0 210 0 0 210 210 210 0 0 0 0 0 SAVANNAH AGRICULTURAL GHANA 0 16 0 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 SCIENCE & TECHN POLICY GHANA 0 18 0 0 18 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 SMARTEAM SERVICES LIMITED GHANA 0 10 0 0 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 STATISTICS, RESEARCH, & GHANA 0 298 0 0 298 298 298 0 0 0 0 0 VOX LATINA GUATEMALA 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE GUINEA 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE GUINEE 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 ASESORES NACIONALES HONDURAS 0 209 0 0 209 209 209 0 0 0 0 0 BANKURA PRECISION INDIA 0 0 40 0 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL INDIA (CITA) 0 0 37 0 37 37 37 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRE FOR INSURANCE AND INDIA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 INDIAN AGRICULTURAL INDIA 0 0 9 0 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 51 INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MGT INDIA 0 175 0 0 175 175 175 0 0 0 0 0 JAMEEL POVERTY ACTION INDIA 20 0 0 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 NEW CONCEPT INFORMATION INDIA 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 SEED INFOTECH LIMITED INDIA 0 0 17 0 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 SIGMA RESEARCH AND INDIA 0 0 8 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 AGENCY FOR TRADE INDONESIA 0 0 37 0 37 37 37 0 0 0 0 0 BOGOR AGRICULTURAL INDONESIA 0 0 22 0 22 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL INDONESIA 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 INDONESIAN CTR FOR AGRIC INDONESIA 0 0 45 0 45 45 45 0 0 0 0 0 PT CAPS INDONESIA INDONESIA 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITAS GADJAH MADA INDONESIA 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORG ITALY 0 3 250 0 253 3 250 253 0 0 0 0 0 POLITENCNICO DI MILANO ITALY 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD ITALY 0 0 35 0 35 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 ASSOCIATES RESEARCH UGANDA 0 0 28 0 28 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 AFRICAN POPULATION AND KENYA 0 0 59 0 59 59 59 0 0 0 0 0 INTL SVC FOR THE ACQUISIT KENYA 0 0 75 0 75 75 75 0 0 0 0 0 KENYA NATIONAL BIOSAFETY KENYA 0 0 72 0 72 72 72 0 0 0 0 0 NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR KENYA 0 0 36 0 36 36 36 0 0 0 0 0 NATL AGRI & FORESTRY RES LAOS PDR 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT OF AGRICULTURAL RES LESOTHO 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRAL AGRICULTURAL LIBERIA 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 FOFIFA MADAGASCAR 0 6 0 0 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT OF AGRICULTURAL MALAWI 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 ENVIRONMENT AND LAND MALAWI 0 0 18 0 18 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF MALAWI MALAWI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DIRECTOR GENERAL MARDI MALAYSIA 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 INST D'ENCONOMIE RURALE MALI 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTO D INVESTIGACAO MAPUTO 0 5 0 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 CNERV MAURITANIA 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 FOOD & AGRIC RES COUNCIL MAURITIUS 0 4 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 52 ASSOCIACAO ACADEMICA DE MOZAMBIQU E 20 0 0 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 FACULDADE DE AGRONOMIA E MOZAMBIQU E 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE MOZAMBIQU E 0 0 384 0 384 384 384 0 0 0 0 0 INTERCAMPUS ESTUDOS MOZAMBIQU E 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 MOZAMBIQUE FER -UAIENE MOZAMBIQU E 0 0 38 0 38 38 38 0 0 0 0 0 KENYA AGRIC RESEARCH INST KENYA 0 10 36 0 46 10 36 46 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATED NEPAL 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTE FOR INTEGRATED NEPAL 0 0 65 0 65 65 65 0 0 0 0 0 NEPAL AGRI RES COUNCIL NEPAL 0 0 10 0 10 10 10 0 0 0 0 0 MAPPING WORLDS NETHERLAND S 0 0 49 0 49 49 49 0 0 0 0 0 ROBOTA SOFTWAREHOUSE BV NETHERLAND S 0 0 27 0 27 27 27 0 0 0 0 0 RUA DESIGN NETHERLAND S 0 6 0 0 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN NETHERLAND S 0 0 174 0 174 174 174 0 0 0 0 0 INRAN NIGER 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH NIGERIA 0 12 0 0 12 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 AGRICULTURAL POLICY NIGERIA 0 5 0 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 NATIONAL BIOTECHNOLOGY NIGERIA 0 0 32 0 32 32 32 0 0 0 0 0 GLOBAL CHANGE IMPACT PAKISTAN 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 INNOVATIVE DEV STRATEGIES PAKISTAN 0 0 478 0 478 478 478 0 0 0 0 0 PAKISTAN AGRI RES COUNCIL PAKISTAN 0 0 14 0 14 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 COSISE RED SAC PERU 17 0 0 0 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 UP LOS BANOS, FOUNDTN INC PHILIPPINES 0 0 23 0 23 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT CENTRAFRICAIN DE REP CENTRAFRICAI NE 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 DELEGATION GENERAL A LA REPUBLIC OF CONGO 0 4 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 INST NAT POUR L'ETUDE ET REPUBLIC OF CONGO 0 8 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE RWANDA 0 0 17 0 17 17 17 0 0 0 0 0 RWANDA AGRICULTURAL RWANDA 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 53 BOARD RWANDA INITIATIVE FOR RWANDA 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 ENTIMEX SOFTWARE SOUTH AFRICA 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 CONSORTIUM POUR LA SENEGAL 0 0 20 0 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT SENEGALAIS DE SENEGAL 0 6 25 0 32 6 25 32 0 0 0 0 0 SIERRA LEONE AGRICULTURAL SIERRA LEONE 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 FINMARK TRUST SOUTH AFRICA 0 0 29 0 29 29 29 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA SOUTH AFRICA 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 MINISTRY AGRICULTURE SOUTH SUDAN 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 AGRICULTURAL RES CORP SUDAN 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SWAZILAND 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 AGRIDEA SWITZERLAND 0 0 406 0 406 406 406 0 0 0 0 0 DEPT OF RESEARCH & DEV. TANZANIA 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TANZANIA 0 0 367 0 367 367 367 0 0 0 0 0 NIRAS TANZANIA LIMITED TANZANIA 0 0 14 0 14 14 14 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUT TOGOLAIS DE TOGO 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 IRESA TUNIS 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 AFRICAN INSTITUTE FOR UGANDA 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 FIT UGANDA LIMITED UGANDA 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 NATL AGRICULTURAL RES ORG UGANDA 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 PLAN FOR MODERNISATION UGANDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UGANDA NATL COUNCIL FOR UGANDA 0 0 41 0 41 41 41 0 0 0 0 0 INSTITUTE OF DEV STUDIES UNITED KINGDOM 0 0 470 0 470 470 470 0 0 0 0 0 KADALE CONSULTANTS (UK) UNITED KINGDOM 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD UNITED KINGDOM 0 0 125 0 125 125 125 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX UNITED KINGDOM 0 0 37 0 37 37 37 0 0 0 0 0 GRUPO RADAR URUGUAY 0 0 25 0 25 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 PORZECANSKI, RAFAEL URUGUAY 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 54 ABT ASSOCIATES, INC. US 0 330 0 0 330 330 330 0 0 0 0 0 CENTER FOR SCIENCE IN THE US 0 0 52 0 52 52 52 0 0 0 0 0 CULTURAL PRACTICE, LLC US 0 13 20 0 33 13 20 33 0 0 0 0 0 DONALD DANFORTH PLANT US 0 0 123 0 123 123 123 0 0 0 0 0 EYEHAND DESIGN US 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 FORUM ONE US COMMUNICATIONS 0 0 236 0 236 236 236 0 0 0 0 0 ILSI RESEARCH FOUNDATION US 0 0 60 0 60 60 60 0 0 0 0 0 ILSI-RESEARCH FOUNDATION US 0 0 537 0 537 537 537 0 0 0 0 0 INNOVATIONS FOR POVERTY US 0 0 31 0 31 31 31 0 0 0 0 0 IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY US 0 0 64 0 64 64 64 0 0 0 0 0 MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY US 0 0 177 0 177 177 177 0 0 0 0 0 POPULATION COUNCIL US 0 0 75 0 75 75 75 0 0 0 0 0 REGENTS OF THE UNIV US MINNESOTA 0 0 145 0 145 145 145 0 0 0 0 0 REGENTS OF THE UNIV CALIF US 0 0 7 0 7 7 7 0 0 0 0 0 SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT INTL US 0 134 64 0 198 134 64 198 0 0 0 0 0 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO US 0 0 132 0 132 132 132 0 0 0 0 0 TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIV US 0 0 18 0 18 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 UNIV OF WISCONSIN-MADISON US 0 0 16 0 16 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS US 0 0 4 0 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA US 0 0 6 0 6 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA US 0 0 23 0 23 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA US 0 0 210 0 210 210 210 0 0 0 0 0 VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC US 0 0 166 0 166 166 166 0 0 0 0 0 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN US 0 0 40 0 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 INDIAN INST OF MGMT US 0 (1) 0 0 (1) -1 -1 0 0 0 0 0 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION VIETNAM 0 0 40 0 40 40 40 0 0 0 0 0 CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL VIETNAM 0 0 18 0 18 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 CENTRE FOR AGRARIAN VIETNAM 0 0 30 0 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 DEPOCEN RESEARCH CENTER VIETNAM 0 0 5 0 5 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 GENERAL STATICS OFFICE OF VIETNAM 0 0 2 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 VIETNAM ACADEMY OF VIETNAM 0 0 3 0 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 55 ZAMBIA AGRIC RES INST ZAMBIA 0 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 Others 267 1,131 3,733 0 5,130 267 1,131 3,733 5,130 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 423 2,949 12,622 0 15,994 423 2,949 12,622 0 15,994 0 0 0 0 0 IITA ILRI Kenya 3 0 6 0 9 3 0 6 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 OLAM Ghana Ghana 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 0 IFPRI USA 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 USAID-EGAT USA 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 Nigeria Nigeria 43 0 0 0 43 43 0 0 0 43 0 0 0 0 0 PURDUE University USA 0 0 19 0 19 0 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 46 0 67 0 113 46 0 67 0 113 0 0 0 0 0 ILRI Bangladesh Rural Advcmt- IFP026 Bangladesh 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 Ministry Livestck&Fishe- WBA024 Tanzania 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 14 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 World Agroforestry No partner section submission 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sub-total for center 10 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 56 World Fish Adelphi Research Gemeinnutzige (GMBH) Germany 0 0 107 0 107 0 0 107 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 Analyzing Development Issues Centre (ADIC) Cambodia 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Cambodia Development Resources Institute (CDRI) Cambodia 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Department of Fisheries, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (DOF) Zambia 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 Fisheries Action Coalition Team (FACT) Cambodia 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 Fisheries Administration (FiA) Cambodia 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 Help the Old Ages of the Most Vulnerable Organization (HOM) Cambodia 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 University of Zimbabwe Zimbabwe 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 University of Cape Coast Ghana 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 164 0 0 164 0 164 0 0 0 0 0 Totals for CRP 504 2,949 15,370 0 18,823 504 2,949 15,370 0 18,823 0 0 0 0 0 Notes: 1. All figures shown here are in USD 000's 2. Totals within this report must agree with amounts reported in L121 "Collaborator Costs - Partners". 3. Annual budget for bilateral is not available at the time of reporting. Assume Annual budget is Actual expense this year. 4. World Agroforestry did not provide info on bilateral funders. To get correct totals, "Various" with a value of $105K is inputted. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 57 8. Report L401 - CRP Funding Statement, Windows 1 and 2 PART 1 - REPORT OF LEAD CENTER (IFPRI) Ope ning Balance - 1 January 0 W1 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates) 26-Apr-12 2,503 31-Oct-12 1,921 20-Dec-12 6,858 Total Receipts 11,281 W2 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates) 20-Mar-12 2,900 26-Apr-12 47 2-Jun-12 2,932 31-Oct-12 597 27-Nov-12 7,019 20-Dec-12 2,218 Total Receipts 15,713 Tran sfers to CG Partners Africa Rice - Bioversity (640) CIAT (509) CIFOR - CIMMYT - CIP (521) ICARDA (32) ICRISAT (1,125) IITA (414) ILRI (1,472) IRRI - IWMI - World Agroforestry (712) World Fish (92) Total Disbursements (5,518) Exp enditure by Lead Center (IFPRI) (9,086) IFPRI (includes $210 payment for 2011 expenditures) Unliquidated Advances to CIAT Partners 0 Fun ds held - end of Period 12,391 PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 58 PART 2 - REPORT OF CGIAR CENTERS Transfers Unliquidated Funds held - start from Lead Advances to Funds held - of Period Center Expenditure Partners end of Period Africa Rice - - - - - Bioversity - 640 (970) - (330) CIAT - 509 (717) - (207) CIFOR - - - - - CIMMYT - - - - - CIP - 521 (692) - (171) ICARDA - 32 (16) - 16 ICRISAT - 1,125 (1,589) - (464) IFPRI - 9,086 (9,086) - - IITA - 414 (527) - (114) ILRI - 1,472 (1,130) - 341 IRRI - - - - - IWMI - - - - - World Agroforestry - 712 (647) - 65 World Fish - 92 (140) - (48) Totals - 14,603 (15,514) - (912) Not e 1. Amounts reported in USD 000's 2. IFPRI’s expense is cumulative (includes 2011 expense) PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 59 9. Report L411 - CRP Funding Statement, Window 2 Date Donor Currency USD Year 2 - 2012 Re ceipts from Donors SDC 20-Mar-12 800 USAID 20-Mar-12 1,500 ACIAR 20-Mar-12 675 Balance from 3/20/12 payment 26-Apr-12 47 Denmark 2-Jun-12 2,932 ACIAR 31-Oct-12 597 Netherlands 27-Nov-12 6,272 Switzerland 27-Nov-12 748 USAID 20-Dec-12 1,470 Australia 20-Dec-12 694 W2 overpayment 20-Dec-12 54 15,789 Transf ers to Lead Center (via CO) Transfer 1 20-Mar-12 (2,900) Transfer 2 26-Apr-12 (47) Transfer 3 2-Jun-12 (2,932) Transfer 4 31-Oct-12 (597) Transfer 5 27-Nov-12 (7,020) Transfer 6 20-Dec-12 (2,218) Other Disbursements CSP paid to Window 1 (75) Funds held by Trustee - during the year 2012 0.00 Notes Amounts should be reported in USD 00 0's This report is on a cumulative basis (prior periods also shown) PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 60 Annex 4: Summary of gender issues identified in each subtheme Theme 1. Effective Policies and Strategic Investments  Subtheme 1.1. Foresight and Strategic Scenarios will use improved sex-disaggregated data systems, including nationally representative data sets and geospatial referencing of gendered farming systems for better assessing environmental and welfare outcomes and analyzing sex- disaggregated impacts of a range of policy and investment scenarios.  Subtheme 1.2. Macroeconomic, Trade, and Investment Policies: Gender will be built into trade models and attention will be paid to the consequences of specific specialization patterns on gender and to the use of trade policies to mitigate gender inequalities. Research activities based on econometric estimation and global CGE modeling will involve investigating the mechanisms through which international migration of male and female workers and remittances affect household income and structure, the agricultural sector, and national economies through changes in domestic labor markets and income transfers, and identify policies that support the expansion of pro-poor nonfarm activities, and especially that increase women’s participation in nonfarm activities.  Subtheme 1.3. Production and Technology Policies will identify policies that can shape the development, dissemination, and marketing of technologies to increase agricultural productivity using more resource-efficient methods and multifunctional technologies. In addition, it will identify policies to make these technologies more accessible to poor women and men, with attention to gender-differentiated constraints and opportunities. It will analyze the distribution of risks and benefits of technologies to different groups, including men and women. Given that extension services are often biased toward men, it will address the challenge of reaching female farmers by assessing the impact of innovative extension approaches by commodity, land use system, gender, age, status, social setting, and region. In addition to conventional agricultural technologies, attention to the agriculture-energy nexus will address fuelwood issues of particular relevance to females by identifying policies to encourage on-farm fuelwood production and improved stoves as part of the shift to sustainable biomass or modern fuels.  Subtheme 1.4. Social Protection Policies research will address how benefits from social protection interventions are distributed across groups, considering both males and females across and within households and over the life cycle. It will identify the circumstances under which social protection stimulates agricultural income growth, asset preservation, and accumulation, as well as whether these benefits are gender differentiated and how innovations in insurance markets can provide better health and livelihood protection for poor men and women and their assets. Evaluations will assess how the implementation modality affects asset creation and the targeting of benefits across and within households, including the gender and generational dimensions of resource allocation within households. For example, what are the perceived and actual differences between transfers targeting women or children and those targeting households more generally? Theme 2. Inclusive Governance and Institutions  Subtheme 2.1. Policy Processes will identify innovative participatory approaches to engage stakeholders, including farmers’ and women’s organizations, in policy processes as well as test the effect of different policy implementation modalities on the distribution of benefits to men and women. It will pay particular attention to the formal and informal institutions that can increase women’s voices in agricultural policy processes through capacity development and work with leaders to improve their awareness and knowledge of the issues.  Subtheme 2.2. Governance of Rural Services will contribute to the formulation of more effective, poverty-oriented, and gender-sensitive policies and governance arrangements that can support the provision of services and infrastructure essential for crop and livestock production, forestry, and fisheries. Depending on context-specific factors, it will identify strategies to make the provision of infrastructure and services more gender sensitive. These strategies will target public administration (such as promoting gender targets for PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 61 extension services and training frontline service providers—males and females, across the life cycle--to address gender-based constraints), local political institutions (such as promoting women in local councils), and community-based organizations (such as examining gender dynamics in producer organizations and involving women’s groups in service delivery).  Subtheme 2.3. Collective Action and Property Rights research will identify effective ways to strengthen the access and tenure security of poor men and women to land, water, trees, and other critical natural resources in the face of increased and globalized competition for resources, particularly in multiuse landscapes. It will also seek interventions that increase the effectiveness of collective action and its inclusion of women and marginal groups, as well as measures to help reduce gender and other inequalities in accessing, participating, and leading collective action institutions.  Subtheme 2.4. Institutions to Strengthen the Assets of the Poor: Research under this subtheme will examine the kinds of assets poor men and women hold, how they acquire them, and how to help individuals build up and protect their stocks; examine the role different types of assets play in enabling men, women, and their households to escape poverty traps, participate in agricultural and nonagricultural growth, and protect their productivity and well-being against shocks, as well as how the roles of assets differ for men and women; and identify institutional arrangements that contribute most effectively to building the assets of the poor and reducing the gender gap in assets, using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, action research, longitudinal studies, and project impact assessment. Theme 3. Linking Small Producers to Markets  Subtheme 3.1. Innovations across the Value Chain will promote increased opportunities for women and greater gender equity in value-chain development and operations. This work will consider ways to ensure that commercialization does not transfer control of assets from women to men, while improving the representation of women as actors throughout the value chain. Of particular interest is the potential for upgrading value chains through postharvest activities as a way to help women generate—and maintain control of-- value added. Participatory approaches will address gender-related issues and ensure increased empowerment and equity for female farmers and other women through increased participation in the value chain. How can quality assurance systems help small-scale farmers (particularly women and the poor) get access to new markets? The program will evaluate the role of women, youth, and excluded populations in horizontal and vertical coordination arrangements and the potential for members of these groups to serve as enterprise leaders.  Subtheme 3.2. Impact of Upgrading Value Chains: This research will identify appropriate indicators and a combination of methods to monitor the performance of different projects, evaluate their effectiveness, and assess their impact on the poor and other target groups, including women. Researchers will include sex-disaggregated data wherever possible, both to assess the effectiveness of programs and to strengthen the availability of information on the extent of the gap in assets and services between men and women. It will develop a toolkit to design and consistently measure the outcomes from improved business practices on smallholder livelihoods in a gender-differentiated manner. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 62 Annex 5: Typology of PIM partners and snapshot of the geographic distribution of PIM partners Table 1: Typology of PIM partners 2012 Category Geographic Type of partner TOTAL level International 32 6 1 4 1 1 Research Regional 3 12 6 4 12 2 1 394 partners National 70 79 90 40 2 17 3 8 International 4 4 4 2 8 8 3 Implementing Regional 1 3 2 3 13 7 11 3 221 partners National 21 9 20 32 5 32 14 7 5 Outreach and International 15 3 5 1 16 11 2 communication Regional 1 10 5 5 15 8 6 6 293 partners National 22 53 37 20 5 29 7 5 6 TOTAL 118 217 173 114 55 123 61 12 35 908 Note: 131 international level partners; 139 regional level partners; 638 national level partners. Excludes funding partners. Figure 1: Snapshot of the geographic distribution of PIM partners 2012 NARS University Research Institute Government Organization Regional Organization NGO Development Agency Farmers' Organization Private Sector PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 63 Annex 6: Interactions with a significant interface between science and policy Meetings/workshops/seminars with a Countries which are using the results to National or international significant science-policy interface (e.g. define or modify national policies and agencies and/or private sector T Title Lead org. multiple high-level policy makers present) strategies actors using the tools and results in their on-the-ground implementation efforts 1 Demographic change, IFPRI 1. The Tanzanian export ban study was Results of Tanzanian export ban study were exchange rate and trade presented at an internal workshop co- chaired cited as evidence by Tanzanian Prime Minister policies and their impact by PS to Prime Minister Office and PS to Ministry for a need to change the policy. The on agricultural of Agriculture. Government subsequently lifted the export transformation and 2. The Nigeria rice policy study was presented to ban. poverty Minister of Agriculture 1 The impact of trade, IFPRI • November 12, 2012. Kevin Chen participated in • The MOA has now signed an agreement with investment and aid by the 2nd Africa-Britain-China Conference on the NEPAD to synergize Chinese engagements China on agricultural Agriculture & Fisheries in Beijing. A number of with CAADP; transformation in Africa high level policymakers participated in the • Introducing concept of value chains as conference, including: Niu Dun, Vice Minister of relevant to transfer of agricultural technology Agriculture, China. from China to Africa to the MOA and DFID • A round table meeting in November 10 2012 China. The new project funded by DFID China with high level Chinese officials and Dr. and the MOA has now adopted the approach. Shenggen Fan (Director general, IFPRI). • Contributing to policy briefing document that has been submitted to the State Council on reforming and managing Chinese aid. 1 Databases and tools for IFPRI 1. The Food Secure Arab World Conference in Too early. Significant impact expected for 1. Analysis supported the analyzing pro-poor February, 2012 with more than 200 participants 2013/14. donors’ multi-billion $ pledge to growth and food security from over 24 countries, including 14 Arab states. Yemen on Sept.5, 2012 in in Arab countries Riyadh. 2. Analysis promoted the inclusion of nutrition in the Doha Declaration on Food Security, endorsed by agricultural ministers on Nov. 15, 2012 3. Research influenced WFP’s country assistance strategy for Egypt. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 64 1 Case studies of country IFPRI Two mechanization studies for Ghana were specific policies to presented at “transforming agriculture” promote agricultural conference in Ghana with parliamentarians and transformation and ministerial officials present. poverty reduction in Key results from the mechanization study for Africa Nigeria were presented at the NSSP conference in November 5. 1 Policy options for IFPRI A presentation at USAID workshop “Enhancing reducing poverty and Resilience in the Horn of Africa: An Evidence- vulnerability in conflict- based summit on strategies for Success" on prone countries “Extreme Weather and Civil War in Somalia: Does Drought Fuel Conflict through Livestock Price Shocks?” 1 Impacts of and returns to IFPRI Analysis supporting design of the CAADP Mozambique: (1) Analysis on the public World Bank plans to use the public investments in Investment Plan presented at a workshop for investment; (2) Analysis of the cost- work on extension in design and agriculture in Africa high officials. IFPRI invited to provide follow-on effectiveness of different modalities for implementation of lending advice. agricultural extension. operations. 1 Study of dynamic labor ICRISAT Analysis of dynamics of rural labor markets. India and Bangladesh The National University of market behavior by using Educational Planning and household longitudinal Administration (NUEPA/New panel data in India Delhi) using the work for policy prescriptions at national level. 1 Effects of exogenous ICRISAT • Workshop on Andhra Pradesh agriculture held • Planning Commission, shocks on supply in September 2012. Government of India, to set response and investment targets and investment in agriculture in South priorities. Asia: an agro-ecosystems • Ministries of Agriculture and perspective Rural Development, Government of India in design of programs for delivery of inputs and services. 1 Structural changes in the IFPRI 1. WTO Public Forum: 2012 • European Union used the work to propose • European Commission global trading system and http://www.wto.org/english/forums_e/public_f changes in biofuel policy. • World Trade Organization consequences for orum12_e/public_forum12_e.htm http://www.ifpri.org/blog/biofuel-policies-re- • United Nations Economic agricultural markets 2. 15th Annual Conference on Global Economic examined Commission for Africa Analysis: Organized by the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP), the WTO, the International Trade PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 65 Centre, and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). This conference is the most attended conference by both academic and technical staff of policy makers in the field of global modelling. https://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu/events/co nferences/2012/default.asp 1 Price volatility IFPRI An International expert consultation organized Central American countries – El Salvador, The tools being developed are transmission from by the Center for Development Research (ZEF) Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua. An MOU part of the AMIS indicators, all international to local and International Food Policy Research Institute with SICA was developed. of this will start to become markets (IFPRI) held at ZEF in Bonn, Germany on January public in 2013. 31 and February 1, 2013. [Preparatory work in 2012.] (http://www.foodsecurityportal.org/global- experts-meet-discuss-food-prices-price- volatility). 1 Development of Bioversity 1. The NUS Conference held on 10-13 December strategies and tools to 2012 in Cordoba, Spain (see expand the use of http://bit.ly/ZWKfqS) farmers, researchers, neglected and media, private sector, NGOs and other civil underutilized species society representatives, along with senior policymakers at both national and international level. Bioversity, ITPGRFA, FAO, PAR, Slow Food International, IFAD. next year in order to further raise the issue of NUS at the Global level. 2. Presentation of analyses of policy effects on NUS conservation and use in Latin America at the Crop Science Congress in Brazil (August 2012) attended by researchers and policy makers. 1 Collective action in the Bioversity Research partners from Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Materials used by national creation, maintenance Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Guatemala, Rwanda agricultural research and use of common and Uganda were trained in policy network organizations (NAROs), genetic resources pools approaches and methods and the use of agriculture and environment Sawtooth Software® for data collection. ministries, universities, and In cooperation with CCAFS, researchers from farmers’ organizations. Research Costa Rica, Rwanda and Uganda were trained results will also inform the in the use of climate analogue tools. implementation of the PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 66 International Treaty on PGRFA (ITPRGFA). 1 Improving the provision IFPRI A regional consultative workshop was held on Work is ongoing. Work is ongoing. of agricultural extension ‘Enhancing agricultural extension and advisory and advisory services services in Africa south of the Sahara through in Sub-Saharan Africa innovative use of ICTs’ in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, using ICTs with attendance by officials from Ethiopia, Kenya, Malawi, Tanzanian, Uganda, and Zambia. 1 Evaluation of innovative ICRAF • Results presented at the annual meeting the East African Diary Development Project has Heifer International, Kenya Dairy extension approaches Global Forum for Rural Advisory Services, adopted the approach for use in 5 countries in Farmers Federation, Uganda Manila, 2012. East Africa (Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Ethiopia Dairy Farmers Federation and • Results presented at the East African Dairy and Tanzania) targeting 400,000 farmers. the BMGF funded East Africa Development Project annual meeting Dairy Development Project. 2 Policies and strategies to ICRAF • Roundtable meeting with over 25 participants, • Early discussions in India led to the promote agroforestry and including 8 from the Indian government. submission of a formal Agroforestry Mission as NRM for enhancing • ICRAF and Ecoagriculture Partners met with well as increased spending for agroforestry in livelihoods of smallholder the Environment Secretary of Kenya to the next five year plan (2013-2017). households in Africa and determine how the work could be used in the • In Kenya, a road map was developed for Asia launch of a major new programme on ICRAF and partner support to the Ministry of sustainable management of watersheds. Environment. 2 Engaging policy WorldFish • Fisheries Governance Dialogue event held for Bangladesh and Solomon Islands: outcomes Bangladesh and Solomon stakeholders across scales Center Western Region of Ghana, April 2012. Project: pending in 2013-2014. Islands: outcomes pending in through community- Integrated Coastal and Fisheries Government for 2013-2014. based action research Western Region Of Ghana, funded by USAID, in partnership with University of Rhode Island. • Design workshop for Khulna Hub, Bangladesh, AAS Program, December 2012. Government, civil society, development agencies represented. 2 Analyzing the effects of IFPRI • In Tanzania, training for staff of the Tanzania • Tanzania: The government is using findings in • Food and Agriculture decentralization and the Social Action Fund (TASAF), a social fund agency. implementation of TASAF. Organisation (FAO); contribution governance environment • In Mozambique, presentation to government • Brazil: Policymakers in local government to ‘The State of Food and on policy processes and officials and civil society on public investment as have cited work in official reports describing Agriculture’ (SoFA) 2012. outcomes part of support to Mozambique’s CAADP new policy directions to improve the • The World Bank, as funding Investment Plan. responsiveness of policy to local needs. agency for TASAF. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 67 2 Governance and public IFPRI 1. October 12-14, 2012. Co-organized an 1) China Center for Agricultural Policy (CCAP) Collaboration with the China investment in rural areas: International Symposium on Rural Development and the Agricultural Commission under the Center for Agricultural Policy lessons from East and & Transformation in Modern China, in Nanjing, People’s Congress. Recommendations for the (CCAP). South Asia with Nanjing Agricultural University and State Council’s recent policy document on the University of Gottingen. reform of China’s agricultural extension 2. Roundtable Consultation on Agricultural system. Extension for Strengthening Sustainable 2) China Agricultural University using findings Agriculture and Farmers’ Participation in Value in discussion with Guizhou Provincial Publicity Chains in Asia, March 15-16, 2012, Beijing Department on gender disparities in land organized by CAAS and Syngenta Foundation for distribution. Sustainable Agriculture. 3) In collaboration with CAAS, Kevin Chen worked with a group of Chinese scientists to contribute to China’s 2012 Number 1 Policy Document, which called for increasing public expenditure on agricultural R&D and enhancing the performance of the agricultural R&D governance system. 2 Collective action, Bioversity Discussions with national policymakers in Peru incentive mechanisms regarding opportunities for the scaling-up of a and policies to strengthen PACS scheme. conservation, sustainable use and governance of agrobiodiversity 2 Impact of land reform IFPRI 1. Malawi: The LGAF Validation workshop and 1. Malawi: A working group seeks to re- 1. If land Bill is passed, programs for improving land policy dialogue meeting took place in July energize passage of the Land Bill that has been implementation would be land tenure security in 2012, with participation by the Minister in Parliament for 5 years. supported under lending selected African countries 2. Ghana: A policy dialogue workshop with 2. Ghana: The LGAF results help inform land operation from the World Bank. strong participation from the Ghana Land administrative reforms in the country which is 2. LAP2 financed by the World Administration Project (LAP2) was held in Feb. led by the phase-II Ghana Land Administration Bank. 2012 - mainly to present Ghana-LGAF results and Project (LAP2). the land policy matrix (recommendation) 2 Property rights, power ICRAF • Provincial level project inception meeting- WG-T (Working Group of relations and benefit workshop in Koronadal, Southern Cotabato Tenure), a national NGO in sharing in common lands southern Philippines. Indonesia has used material to in Asia and Africa • Free-Informed Prior Consent meeting and train several local governments ritual in Bukidnon Philippines, participated by on developing Forest local government officials and Council of Elders. Management Unit (FMU) in Sumatra, Kalimantan and PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 68 Sulawesi. 2 Strengthening women’s IFPRI • Stakeholder workshops were held in Kampala, Partners in this projects are large civil society • Land O'Lakes International: assets for better Uganda and Dar es Salaam. organizations and agricultural development modified their training programs development outcomes • UN Foundation/ExxonMobil workshop at the organizations. in Mozambique. Greentree Estate, NY: “What Works for • CARE Bangladesh Women’s Economic Empowerment” Strengthening the Dairy Value Chain Project includes activities to reduce violence against women • BRAC Bangladesh Challenging the Frontiers of Poverty Reduction-Targeting the Ultrapoor Program enhancing focus on gender. 3 Building sustainable CIAT General presentations: (a) CRS projects and Field applications: (a) IFAD trading relationships partners (NGOs, farmer associations and public ACUA project in Colombia and between smallholder sector actors) in Nicaragua to discuss the Ecuador to test participatory farmers and buyers concepts and general rationale of the method; methods with farmer (b) technical teams from World Bank Productive associations; (b) VECO Peru Alliance projects in seven countries in LAC; (c) to international horticulture export a global audience at the Seas of Change event in chain including farmer the Netherlands. association, exporter, importer and Belgian retailer; and, (c) application of the guide to assess farmer-owned marketing platforms (Fundamerca and ALSUR) in Colombia. 3 Understanding the ICRAF Keynote presentation “Review of Guides for The research results will be available to policy LWR Peru – Letter of agreement potential for addressing Value Chain Analysis and Development”, and strategy makers at the end of the research under elaboration for the rural poverty through presented at the conference Making the project. assessment of the interventions value chain development Connection: Value Chains for Transforming for the development of the for underutilized fruits Smallholder Agriculture, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, cocoa value chain in Peru, in Nov 6-9, 2012. collaboration with ICRAF and the EU-importer Ecom. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 69 3 Assessing contractual ICRISAT • Stakeholder meeting between food processors • Federation of Mooriben preferences between and producer group in Niger farmers in Niger (Bokki, Tera, grain producers and • Meetings with all value chain actors in Niger Falwel and Dantchandou) processors of sorghum and Nigeria • Federations of women and pearl millet in Niger processors in Niger (FEBA and and Nigeria DIGA BEGUE) 3 Improving the quality of IFPRI • In Uruguay presentations at the Ministry of Buusaa Gonofaa MFI and scalable agricultural Agriculture and the Insurance Company BSE to Oromia Insurance S.C.: Buusaa insurance for small-holder introduce the concept of index-based products. Gonofaa and Oromia Insurance farmers • In Ethiopia initial results presented at the are proving gap insurance with Ethiopian Economics Association meetings in the index insurance products Addis Ababa in 2012. that they provide in Oromia in Ethiopia. 3 Understanding the IFPRI • University of Georgia’s department of constraints rural producer Agricultural and applied Economics organizations face in • University of Gottingen’s Global Food Research linking farmers to markets Colloquium • IFPRI-Dakar’s research seminar • IFPRI-Washington work in progress seminar 3 Innovative financing for IFPRI • November 12, 2012. Kevin Chen participated in China and India At this stage involving all the agriculture and food value the 2nd Africa-Britain-China Conference on Policies to reform agricultural marketing and stakeholders in China and India chains in Asia Agriculture & Fisheries in Beijing, and made the financing sector in China and India, and for their use the tools and the presentation on “Value Chain: An Integrated learning lessons from each other. results at the ground level. Approach to Agricultural Development”. • December 14, 2012. Organized a workshop on ‘Indian Agrifood System and the World Market’, National Agricultural Science Center, New Delhi, India. 3 Building R4D learning CIAT Joint planning exercises took place with the • Central America – CRS, platforms in Latin regional partners for the Central American Swisscontact, CATIE and VECO America, Africa and Asia learning alliance (CRS, Swisscontact, CATIE and and the Central American VECO) as well as the Inter-American Institute for learning alliance. Agricultural Cooperation (IICA) in September • Northern Africa / Middle East 2012. – IDRC and IFAD have requested that CIAT and ICARDA develop a learning alliance approach for KARIAnet in 9 countries. PIM/CRP2 annual repor t ing for 2012 Page | 70 G Women’s empowerment ICRISAT 1. Workshop on”Women’s empowerment in Use of the VDSA/VLS data ongoing by national • Research linkages with the in rural India: micro-level rural South Asia: micro-level evidences on labor and international researchers. Tata Institute of Social Studies evidences on labor participation, institutions and food security” was (TISS), IIT-B, Delhi School of participation, institutions organized on November 6, 2012. Economics, NIN and College of and food security Home Science. 2. A Policy dialogue on Building climate resilient agriculture in India” on 22 May, 2012 at the NASC complex, New Delhi.