the consultative group on international agricultural research technical advisory committee report of the tat quinquennial review mission to the international institute for tropical agriculture tat secretariat FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS .1W/TAC: IAR/:S/!2,/Re~tricted' THE CUNSULTATNE GRBJP ON mEX?NATIoNAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCR TXXNICAL Nineteenth Meeting, ADVISORY COMNITTtiE Nairobi, Kenya, 6-13 June 1978 REPORT OF THE TAG QUINQU3XNIAL REVIZW MISSlW TO I'H& INTEFWATIONAL INS'IWUTE OF TROPICAL AGRlCULTURE (IiTA) (Agenda Item 7) TAC SECRETARIAT FOOD Al?!3 AGRICULTURE OFGANIZA?'ICJN OF THE UNIk'&l, NATIOh'S Rome, 1978 RiPUBLiQUE FRANCAl§E PARIS, le 22 September 1978 24, RUE BAYARD, PARIS (8’ ) TBI 225-31-52 Le Directeur Gdneral Dear ..e Dr. Cummings, I take pleasure in transmitting to you herewith the report of the Panel of the TAC Quinquennial Review Mission to the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture. The Panel commends and recommends a series of measures for the work of the Institute, the concentration and consolidation of its future activities. was conducted on the basis of the As you know, this review terms of reference which were approved by the Technical Advisory Committee at its 15th Meeting in February, 1977. Since then, the Committee had recommended that the terms of reference for quinquennial reviews be reformulated, placing equal emphasis on the examination of the mandate, policies and priorities of the Centre.and their rationale, and on the assessment of the scientific quality of the programmes. Although these changes had not been formally effected when the review was conducted, the Institute and the Panel made a special effort to address these questions. The mandate of the Institute, and its interpretation and implementation, are discussed in Chapter II. The priorities within each programme, and their rationale, are then discussed in the following chapters (III-IX), along with past achievements, problems and priorities. Several recommendations are also made in Chapter X, with a view to strengthening the overall coordination and control of the programmes within the framework of both established priorities and ceilings for future activities. - The Panel had the opportunity to visit IITA cooperative programmes in Liberia, Nigeria, Sierra Leone, Tanzania and Zaire, and noted that a growing number of countries, particularly in Africa, are seeking participation in cooperative programmes with IITA. The Panel submits some guidelines for the Institute in Chapter XI aimed at furthering its impact at the national level while avoiding an over-commitment which could be detrimental to its prime role in international research. In research the context programmes, of the these Panel cooperative programmes and also made a number of suggestions in . . I. Dr. Ralph Chairman Technical W . Cummings Advisory Committee of the support of the Institute's present efforts to rationalize and strengthen coordinaticn and cooperation with other institutes such as IRRI, CIMMYT, CIAT, ICRISAT, ILCA, WARDA and ICIPE. It is clear, however, that a quinquennial review panel cannot adequately assess both sides of the relationship between two Centres. Some of the suggestions made in this report should therefore be considered further, not only by the Centre Directors and Boards of Trustees concerned but also by TAC and other future review mission panels. I am pleased to report that, as indicated in the conclusions presented in Chapter XII, the Panel found that the Institute was fulfilling its mandate with realism and efficiency. After a difficult start, the Institute had undergone considerable expansion, commensurate with the magnitude and diversity of agricultural research problems in the humid tropics. The quinquennial review took place at a time when, after such expansion, the Centre and its Board felt the need to undertake a process of priority setting, streamlining and consolidation. Consequently, not only in the course of the review, but also during its preparation and finalization, there was a close and fruitful interaction between the Centre's Director, Board of Trustees and staff, and the Review Panel, in this process. As a result, the Panel was pleased to give its full support to several measures taken by the Centre to concentrate its activities and, conversely, the Board generally agreed with the recommendations of the Panel for furthering this consolidation process. However, it should be realized that, due both to its location and to the nature of the problems it deals with, some of which are probably among the most difficult in agricultural research in developing countries, the Centre will continue to be relatively costly. Besides, although very significant results have already been attained by IITA in the development of improved agricultural technologies for further advances are likely to be slow, the humid and sub-humid tropics, and ensuring increased food production and stable food supplies in these regions will also be a lengthy process. In its recommendations, to improve the focus of the research programme of IITA, the Panel realizes that the Institute will have to leave aside a number of activities and commodities which are important in the humid tropics, and particularly for some countries in Africa. Although some flexibility should be left to this Centre to tackle new problems, the Panel felt that a number of areas would be better covered by national research programmes and by initiatives at regional or global level, rather than by broadening the programmes of an institution which has probably now reached its optimum size. the members of the CGIAR should be In spite of these pro'blems, proud of the impact which their contributions are making through IITA to the improvement of tropical agriculture, and it is the conviction of the Review Panel that this support from the Consultative Group should continue to be fully sustained. . . I. -v- I wish to thank you and the Committee for the confidence you placed in me for conducting this review. It has been a great privilege for me to benefit in this difficult task from the competent advice, full cooperation and hard work of the Panel members. The report is the result of their common endeavour and represents their collective evaluation of the Institute, I am particularly grateful to the Chairman of the Board, and to the Director General of the Institute, Dr. Hugh Bunting, Dr. William Gamble, for their good will and patience in clarifying for the Panel and myself the complex nature of the mandate, policies and priorities of the Institute and for their useful comments on the draft of the report. The Director General and his staff should also be congratulated for the quality of the programme presentations and the full cooperation extended to the Panel in the preparation, conduct and finalization of the review. Finally, I would like to thank you, Dr. Cummings, and the Committee, for the useful comments made on the preliminary draft. final version of the report, which I have the pleasure to submit herewith, has taken due account of these suggestions. Yours sincerely, The B TO THE ~~~ATI~~ IRSTITUTE OF' TROPICAL AGRICULTURE (,IITA> essor Messrs: Guy Camus (Chairman) R. Abpams T. Ajibola-Taylor J a E. J. L. Brewbaker Dillon Ferwerda H. G, Dicln J ,, D. Q, Fischbcck R. G, Grogan D. Flueknett HP, B. H& Tinker F. J, Nahler (Secretary) J. K, Coultcr (Observer) ' - ix - Chapter I 11 I-7 8-18 19-35 III 36-42 ;:2; (i) (ii) ~A~~G ( (iii) (iv) (v) The Mandate and its Interpretation The Implementation of IITA's Nandate SYSTE FROG~~ (FSP),, ee *e .. 0a e* 64-72 73-81 82-86 67-93 y4-10 I 102-110 11 l-131 Introduction,, 88 eo *a BO Socioeconomic StucKes 11 Land Management and Sol; StZ.es" Cropping Systems Ba o8 oB e. Qe Pest Management *. eo 00 Land Utilization S;steZi ** e* Farm Implements and Iaohlne& eB BB (viii) Major Issues., se eB ae ee eO (ix) General Conclusions and Recommendations (x) Specific Conclusions and Recommendations WBER ARK ROOT IMPRO~ PROGRAMME (TRIP) IV 132-135 136 137-141 142-165 (i) (ii) ( 166-168 169-177 178-186 V 187-188 489 190-201 202-208 209-213 214-215 216 21'7-224 (v) (vi) (vii) (i) (ii) Introduction,. e. 6e e. ,sQ Objectives 0e 0. 0e *O BI Organization oe Scope and Major A~~ompi~shrn~ks eB Cassava ee 8. ee oe Yams *o e* *D c, Sweet po;&o o. oe e. fiture Trends I)o eB 0. ao Issues Be BB Bo o. 0e em Conclusions and Recommendations ,* PROGRAMNE (GLIP).. oB ** ** e8 o(D es o. aO ee Introduction., Objectives GRAIN LEGUME I~~OVE~ (vi) (vii) (viii) (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) (vii) (viii) 1 ~ Pigeon pea e* 00 Misoellaneou~'Le~es Bo se Conclusions and Recommendations F'ROGRAMMIZ (CIP) ee es B. eB se VI 225-227 228-233 234-237 238-248 249-257 258-263 264-266 267 268-276 C.ER.EU IMF'RO~~ Introduction.. ae ea B* Be Objectives De o. ** ee oe Organization.. o. es *o o(I Scope and Achievements of the Maize Programme Scope and Achievements of the Rice Programme International Programme Relationships.. eO Future Plans.. B* 0e .* Assessment of ConZ;'raiZs a2 IsZes 8o -x- TABLE OF' CONTENTS (continued) Cha.pter VII 277-299 300-305 306-312 313-320 321-324 VIII 325 326-333 334-337 338 Paragraphs RESEARCHSUPPORT.. (i) (ii) (t;;j (v) .. .. .. .. .. ,, . . 68 . . 63 :: 72 71 . . 74 . . 75 . . 77 ., :: Germplasm Unit (including Virology Unit ,Seh;L&Doratori.e.s 1: .. .. .. Quarantine .. .. .. seed services) 1: .. .. ,. 1: .. .. .. 1: ,. .. .. .. 11 .. .. .. 1: ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. CONFERENCEkmTRAININGPRmAM (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) 3 39-345 Ix 346-350 351-355 X 356-362 363-365 366-369 370 371-375 XI 376-377 378-379 380-389 XII 390-397 398-403 ANNEXES Objectives Organization:: 1: 11 1: Major Achievements .. .. Future Trends Conclusions and R~comm~~dat~ks .. 77 79 77 . . 79 . . 79 . . 81 . . 87 l 81 DCXWMEXTATIm AND INFORMATION . . (i (ii (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (i) (ii) (iii) (i) (ii) I II m III Documentation Centre and Library.. Communications and Information .. .. .. .. ORGANIZATION AR-DMANAGENXNT . . 83 Administrative and Personnel Services.. Programme Planning, Budgeting and Balance Organization and Management of Scientific Disciplines .. .. .. .. .. Station Managemen;. .. .. .. ,. .. Conclusions and Recommendations . . .. .. .. ., .. .. .. ,. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ,. .. Objectives .. .. .. .. .. .. Major Achievements Conclusions and Recommendations .. .. .. .. Conclusions .. Recommendations ,. .. Composition Itineraries .. .. .. .. .. .. :: 83 84 COOPERATIVE PROGRANMES :: 85 86 . . 86 . . 58 . . aa . . 85 . . a9 . . 92 . . 92 . . 93 . . 98 CONCLUSIOXS AND RECOMME3-DA'T'IONS .. Acknowledgements of the Review Panel and Timetable available List of Main Documents made to the Review Panel CHAPTEX? 10 1. quality which under it In July INTRODUCTION 1973p the Consultative Group on International arrangements Agricultural Agricultural Research Research scientific Centres (IARCs) to the proposals (TAC) with (CGIAR) saw the need to make some long-term and effectiveness supports, the Chairmanship to assess the overall of the International of Dr. David Subsequently, report Bell The CGIAR therefore set up a 'Subcommittee of the Ford Foundation, the report was revised Subcommittee on Review Procedures', which reported following the deliberations CGIAR in November -1973. of the CGIAR. with their regard conduct: "The CGIAR also overall continuing ensure higher basis, it that scientific need for activities The revised to Centre of the Bell made the following Advisory Committee of the Reviews, and charged the Technical external emphasis needs periodic quality its work, of lower independent with special assessments and effectiveness priority no less of each Centre, are replaced by those every and of the of five and years. on the need to on an annual priority. but should Such assessments be scheduled are equally major external segments are not appropriate frequently than Such assessments is the practice for a Centre separately than for for itself pating lay such periodic that needed by the Centres to organize The CGIAR looks are made; it process process separate of the research themselves, rather of the Centres as a whole). them (sometimes progrsmme, to the TAC to ensure would seem feasible assuring particiwith can and (2) it that assessments responsibilities assessment assessment If process the TM to meet its the CentreVs Director. for its (1) in the Centre's in most cases by (1) is adequate, by mutual it from that necessary, agreement the Centre's by the Centre the TAC considers on a special assessment organized own purposesOn the TAG and the Centres scientific for participating its judgments assessments; develop (2) it an agreed conducting reviewing - 'We recommend that fonwsrd a regular their necessary, schedule such periodio results, and agreed standards and methods for external the TAC adopt may consider procedure in such assessments, assessments to the CGIAR,'@ making any independent end reporting -2- 2. The TAC accepted,this "On behalf value assure funded of the scientific the Consultative are being mandate on the following Group, toassess general terms of reference: and to of the Consultative the quality in order policies programmes of the Centres Group members that out in line standard will with expected." declared the operations being and carried to the full "It international is hoped that themselves the review in planning Centres validity Centres." TAC also 3. prepare draft was carried institute consultation inter alia assist the International -their progrsmmes and 'ensuring the recognized by the Boarda of the of the research priorities charged terms out in late its Secretariat for 1975, that to draw up a schedule the review in missions. 1977. IITA for to CIIWYT in the Spring of reference of TITA, for such reviews and to to IRRI of reference The Review Xission of 1976, that was selected to CIP in as the fifth after the Autumn of 1976, and that to be reviewed with the Director to CIAT early General and the terms the Review Mission, as follows: were finalized "Terms of Reference In pursuance particular (i) attention the results Institute planned (ii) of the Quinquennial to the following of past research Review of IITA defined aspects above, the Mission is requested to give of the work of the Institute: progrsmmes at the are of the main objective, and training and the use to which the results to be) put; scope, content and objectives have been (or the relevance, and planned thereof, that increased composition of the present in relation out interpretation carrying needs for on the future being under- programmes of research and its food strategy at the Instit-lte current for to a) the Institute's mandate; mandate and its and procedures globally, and b) the immediate supplies and balance conference and long-term and to advise progrsmmes and the factors countries by the of the progrsmme of research; and training affecting once their information and its (iii) the current taken training or planned by the Institute by the recipient the use of trainees (iv) the effectiveness service impact on recipient has been completed; of the work conducted progrsmmes countries; and outreach of the Institute, -3- (v) (vi) (vii) the expenditures nature the and quality of the Institute of its research in relation and training available to the quantity, programmes; the programmes of the or adequaoy of the resources and training objectives, to implement the achievement means of reducing of research the constraints Instftutets eliminating (viii) both other (ix) recommended above; and possible which may be hindering such constraints; of coordination of internal and international questions TAC to examine, the Missicn will with the effectiveness in respect national elements, any other of activities'at and balance to its reference concerned the Institute, of programme linkages with consistency and in particular specific organizations. which members of the CGIAB may request On the basis of its review, report to the Chairman or orientation under item of TAC its views on the need for make proposals the Mission it ization., any changes in the basic for overcoming feel free understood objectives of the 1nstitute"s and will IWhile it wishes, organ(vii). programme elements, should and on means of imprwing any constraints that the Mission the efficiency identified cannot of operations, to make any observations or recommendations must be clearly vizLlg commit the sponsoring the CGIAR/TA@.~f specific questions were also listed to be addressed by the Review The following 4. Panel: (i> desirability year (ii>, process of planning especially research with basis, and the feasibility/ progrmmes on a fiveand ocore" an integrated of cooperative responsibilities of IITA/national mandate; progremmes, both imprwement research internal e.g, i. ii. and farming projects priority relative relative selection adaptability, within setting: emphasis emphasis for on in the light of IITA's amended crop between of and (iii) as (a) them, between the various programmes and (b) and the methodology cereals and grain adaptation versus systems legumes; to and wide given to the specific environments -4- (iv) Training (a) levels individual regional headquarters; and appropriateness; trainee) problems and to which into 'core' aspects budget. on a level of training comparative at national value at IITA (to the on level as opposed to working (v) (vi) number of post-doctorals employed. w Adequacy of post-harvest work and extent of post-harvest work should be absorbed of major countries, -Economics and Socioeconomics actual and potential value (4 w commodities i.e. research; and its and global basis in developing for with continuing other the basic justification in comparison the relation Place being centres (b) (4 (d) (4 (Viii) expenditure commodity of socio,of IITA's economic research work in farming developing and the other in farming role to the farming systems, Work Systems Research Programme. (vii) (a) and role especially in tropical involved; of tree systems research; of, and need for, engineering. other IARCs and agencies work in West Africa; formal agreements; work. donors and other issues activities nonwith (See the some major, to development and of collaborative programmesJ several, national especially: enhanced research in crops research; role of livestock in farming systems research; of vegetables in and potential potential countries. done or planned, IARCS or national the role farming systems the role agricultural with the possible the future Relations (a) (b) (c) WARDA- on rice CIMMYT and CIAT - the need for ICIPE - in respect with section role This national raises (ix) Relationships IARCs. respect revised in the to IITA's vis-a-vis relating programmes. mandate of IITA, 1978 Programme of Work and Budget.) (x) Linkages between headquarters and off-campus staffing programmes. of these Feedback mechanisms and comparative programmes and those at heaci+a&ers. (xi) for (xii) service 5. IITA"s example, for transfers approach, and future potential terms staff, of, of in tissue culture+ of any differential recruited B in the light ~~t~r~~~~~~~~~~y and nationally for the ~~~~~~~~~~ of PITA who reports donors cific The preparations of major Review were conducted s consulted on these by the Review. preparations were invited were received A list in close cooperation ~Lth the Director and the list meetings General on the composition at the of the Team 16th and 47th donors from IITA and attached and questions progress s to be addressed to IITA TAC and Consultative Croup members received of TAC, of references have been taken as Annex T. together 6. In addition, into consideration to starting basic been Sierra to comment on the terms from several of Panel members is are listed AdditicnaI Prior other questions the Review, by the Panel. the Panel members received documents which during the progress from the TAC Secretariat with a number of briefing documents utilized eed that part prior in Annex II, of the Review* a survey would a - ft had earlier to the full Zaire Review Mission, Review, and Nigeria. of IITA's be undertaken, progrsmmesin cropping as an integral. TanzarLa, of the Quinquennial cooperative Leone9 Liberia, Due to the different the month of J. Brewbaker, May, 1977. divided before seasonsP the programme in Tanzania a Tesm consisting and Mr, B,M, Webster visited commenced the full to visit in another headquarterse ire, sites week at IITA had to be examined during G. Camus (Chairman), country from 11-18 May, and therefore T, Ajibol+Taylor 78 of Professors that The Penel three Review on 16 October, Ibadan, on 22 October. rice cooperative the members being activities into groups at IITA activities whilst some of the remaining another visited XITA cooperative assembling researeh Liberia, outside One group examined cassava Leone and activities in Nigeria, progremmes in Sierra group examined IITAps the headquarters spent facilities IITA staff is sufficient the first The Panel and other at which provided research a headquarters During this listening to the presentations fields, laboratories sites the visits with of the activities and progrsmmes conduzting at all head e and visiti the experimental The presentation of the Institute. eriments, levelsc ~~~ort~~~~ week the Panel also visited and the field discussion to the Review Panel members for of IITA The seoond week at IITA findings, soms critical writi issues r"cers was mostly with the imotor devoted drafts General to discussing of the report, the Panel"s end examining and discussi~n.g the preliminary further and heads of programmes. -6- The itinerary and progremme schedule of the Review Teem are given in Annex 11. this Review at IITA coincided analysist9 of' farming with the visit systems research at CIA?, IITX, It should be noted that ICRISAT and IRRI. teaas. In addition, in the visit of another review teem cherged with the "stripe D&S. J. L. Dillon and 5. Plucknett were members of both rel.-iew Dr. G. Vallaeys, member of the stripe review team, partinipatr,d in Zaire end steyed with the Quinquennial October. Review t,ee."~ until 29 to IITA activities at IITA headquarters -7- CHAPTERII0 (i) 8. its IITA AS AN 3NTERNATIONALRESEARCH AND TRAINING INSTI'IUTE Interpretation made in this as last report revised to the Institute's mandate and 1977 is by the Board in April research The Mandate and its interpretation, in full Within institutes Agricultural IITA will: In view of the.many references below: the mandate of IITd reproduced the system of cooperating associated international agricultural with the Consultative Group on International funds ere available, systems in the viable the with zones, maintain Research (CGIAR),and provided studies of and research (a> conduct on farming humid and subhumid tropical alternatives productivity particular to shifting reference zone in order to identify cultivation which will cultivation, all climatic of the land under continuous to food crops; owering responsibility, to the improvement (b) (4 accept worldwide for research sweet potatoes; conduct studies of Africa, for oassava) pigeon institutes and directed of cowpea, yams and and research, in the humid and subhumid regions the imprwement of crops such as maize, rice, pea and soybean3 for which other international organizations have special responsibility, with those cooperating in whatever ways may be appropriate institutes and organizations; (d) conduct research which are, of the humid and subhumid zones, such as lima been, winged bean and other grain legumes, coooyam, taro and other aroids, and plantain and other forms of Muss which contribute substantially to the diets of the people of the zones; make agaAiable >he re<s:of: s&dies er&.'re_search carried out in accordance with paragraphs and institutions to nations which wish to use them through to the imprwement of other crops or may become, important in the farming systems directed (e> w _ (a) to (d) abwe cooperation with regional and national programmes; take responsibility in collaboration with the International Board for collection, of genetic Plant Genetic Resources for documentation the exploration, end evaluation and tuber crops conservation, materials of food legumes, root and rice in the humid and subhumid regions of Africa in order to m&e these materials available for use by plant breeders and scholars; -8- (g) respond cooperation humid which to requests with from regional regions appropriate and national of Africa competence; where systems authorities programmes concerned in for in the the of interthose in IITA coto regions with and subhumid IITA improvement respond, national associated authorities co7.nltries of farming respond, operation requests of Africa knowledge agricultural (j> provide on topics to (i) number research (k) cor.d-XYt, studies concerned rural, of Trustees of farming has appropriate in'association institutes with for other the than and crops appropriate respect other (h) with particularly from with and organizations CGIAR, to requests with cooperation Africa, appropriate progremmes, the of which improvement regional in respect concerned systems insofar with from for and of crops as it is has appropriate (i> competence; competent in in the to do so and in where humid developing appropriate, and subhumid the including agricultural their other institutions governments cooperation of their training, to the the research systems or orpanize relevant countries capabilities; conferences tasks persons on crops for, or topics outlined purpose to carry in and workshonq paragraphs (a) the ofincrea:ting out effective, systems; or to Eoard above with particulax of well-qualified and development or take on other with agricultural crops the and farming and such responsibility application and national such research activities of reseerc!. as the of results development may approve.fl revised Its therefore development of crops, therefore in 1977, 9. This mandate, of the other of the Trustees present es last IARCs. Institute and the is far more complex Board and broader in in the than that of most of the 3oard and the interpretation of the with the the result by the activities scope of !l?rustees and by the fo?rr.u2.ntion of gears,the management of assumes a particular of this importarze of ITTA. mandate evolution. activities programmes Over the terms of the has been concerned range is mandate geographical coverage, and cooperative Ins-kitutc, of a gradual -9- (1) 10. Crops and geographical The Institute initially strong cwerage concentrated core its activities on its main site in trying to develop a sufficiently in cooperative African work. of the InstituteDs of the Institute of research that and experience before engaging itself Nigerian, West The Board, however, soon found it institution". The biogeographical necessary to widen the scope scope of responsibilities of the earth which lie to those parts exceeds program stressing was defined IITA is "not a specifically those regions or even African in 1970 "as including between the northern and southern desert belts, with particular reference which are lower than 2000 feet abwe sea level and in which precipitation evaporation 11. for six or more months of the year". Another reason for modification of the ecological orientation of IITA was the location of the Institute itself which is situated in the transitional area between two complsmentaryzones from the economic viewpoint: the Savannah. The Board therefore defined II. ..within the system of cooperating available IOTA will: (a> take responsibility as hitherto on all b) defined continents; in respect further the low humid tropical funds are region systems forest and in 1971 the scope of IITA as follows: IARCs and provided of the humid tropical (above) for research on agricultural accept worldwide responsibilities covering all climatic regions for research on cowpea, soybean, pigeon pea, and lima 'bean among the grain 1egumes;and on yams, Colocasia and Xanthosoma (tero and cocoyam) and sweet potatoes among the root and tuber crops; accept appropriate responsibilities, if asked to do so, within for other crops (particularly those of the African continent, interest in the humid tropis) for which other institutes have worldwide responsibility, such as maize, rice and cassava; and conduct or take responsibility for such research on other crops or topics as the Board mqy apprwe*" cc> (d) In subsequent meetings of the Board, the responsibilities of IITA were further broadened. Plantain was added to the list of research commodities in 1972 and later, substantially to the diets of the people in 1976, "other forms of Musa which contribute 12. of the (humid and subhumid) zones". beans and other grain legumeslI ..e. as being those "which are, or msy become important and subhumid zonesl). leafy vegetables (e.g. programmes of IITA. Other crops were added in 1976 such as Winged "other avoids" and in general these axe justified in the farming systems of the humid Of these craps, several vegetables such as tomatoes, peppers, Celosia end Amexanthus) were also included in the research - IO - 13. this crops systems The Eoard responsibility involved also accepted of the is than in grain that. 1975 responsibility legume covered (see crops, confined to Africa by the Chapter list for and root crop VII, germplasm and tuber for (i)). improvement collection crops. cowpea) the and Although r;mge of preservation at IITA essentially Institute (except section is wider and farming programmes As further of the for in of the additions 14. as the were made to the several pea while for which of the Institute. IITA of commodities cwered by IITA the ani CGIAR system developed, adjustments retained were made concerning regional (i) geographical worldwide for &ich fos as coverege Centrc this IITA crop activities ICRISAT was recognized between imprwement the as the crops for research Africa. (ii) on pigeon reponsibilit:. yams and of IITA assuming having with IRRI, improvement A distinction responsibility those for necessitates, and (iii) with crops ICKLSAT). with zones. the as part the their that (i.e. was made also genetic the those other worldwide for has a worldwide systems (cowpea, genetic is rice sweet potatoes), farming components responsibility responsibilities with CIAT, IITA in scope, pigeon is responsibility IITA research in or may necessitate, which Centres maize with of such systems, cooperation for these pea with a regional worldwide cessava and institutions CIWYT, 15. crops the therefore faced different If levels compared of IITA's of responsibilities with the mandates size mandate of the in the which production Institute ere striking. for of other of the XII. assist of the progremmea different IARCs This Institute. in the The genersl th'e Board Institu-le will the an raises different complexity ecological regarding and general in examining of IITA in and responsibilities priorities a number of questions These questions following and the into utilize chapters management the critical institute. with in which aim of the Panel sharper and the review of the to bring are presented optimum major are addressed of the programmes conclusions progremmes attempts Chapter was to activities will foclx,and to ensure a limited impact number of priority mass of resources end the end competence on food facilitate expected from technological international (2) Cooperation AS break-throughs national its progremmes IITA the results and other of (its) authorizes IARCs as a centre with in Africa b;lT its for Africa.. to nations and nation5 where mandate, it is when reference ITT.1 studies IITA is and research region21 without to cooperate, 16. indicated '90 mandate, wish was not conceived cooperation programmes IITA is requested and institutions programmes". competent to any other make available to use them through further other and national hand, The revised to do so, with institution. mandate regional Cn the required - 11 - to do so -in association with the appropriate IARC serving that continent. The present mandate, however, is unclear on the mode of cooperation of IITA with other IARCs in Africa on progranunes dealing been established relationships with crops such as maize, rice, responsibility. consideration Diverse chapters cassava, pigeon pea for which cooperative arrangements have These other Centres have worldwide or are'under cooperating with gwernments or regional agencies in any other continent, between IITA and other Centres. It ere discussed in the respective according the Director on crop improvement programmes was, however, .felt encouraged in strengthis clear or and they vary considerably by the Panel that of the other international ening and clarifying their that cooperating countries duplication offer of the services to them either are reported to the crop end Centre. General and the Board of Trustees of IITA and those. Centres concerned should be further cooperation through appropriate arrangements. It m ight be increasingly confused by the multiplicity and forms of cooperation or collectively. at national which the different The Penel,therefore, levels Centres may examined individually the implications findings of such cooperation in Chapter XI. in a number of cases and its - The mandate gives very broad scope to the possible cooperation of IITA with of the genetic material nationel programmes. This mqy include the distribution 17. collected imprwement by IITA "for of farming use by plant breeders end scholarsfl; cooperation in "the of their or systems end crops in respect in developing the humid and subhumid regions capabilities"; the "prwision and for of which IITA has appropriate knowledge systems d . . . including of training such research of Africa) for competence"; "cooperation the agricultural . . . countries . . ..(in agricultural research conferences studies on other or organization and workshops"; the t'conduct or responsibility suoh activities crops or topics concerned with the application of results of research to rural, agricultural and national development as the Board of Trustees may approve" '*I. Here again the mandate of the Institute is very broad and permits considerable especially in responding flexibility in cooperating with national to unexpected needs or opportunities. progremmes, The continuing attention of the Board of Trustees and of the management of the 18. Institute, therefore, appears essential in ensuring that the cooperative activities of the Centre remain closely related to its central reseerch objectives. The Panel therefore d feels that the Board should further this may include elaborate its general policy guidelines The Panel notes that both education end training. (*) Underlined by the Panel. - 12 - and criteria selectivity eration to this with effect. due account cooperative (ii> for its cooperative the of the progranunes. progrenunes in order the to maintain for by the Chapter Panel considers consistency developing it its and coopthat with Committee in meeting national be taken increasing general is demands and pressures In so doing, principles discussed XII formulated under importen-t deals CGI9R Review XI,which *This matter further programmes, and in Chapter of IITA's (Conclusions). The Implementation Although a major the Mandate were implicit by the of the in target the initiG1 mandate Instit-:tc :md of 19. and its traini-g objectives these of the programme objectives in of ITTA, effort has been made over identification cooperation, is only considered of the of the the While it real of the the years terms problems management of the Board to define programmes, for researchad at IITA the of research form-lation end priorities, of relevant strategies 20. which end organization struct.xes. to problems which in the fxrm to be the i:: to tropics level. main Research prevent as a means of finding objective of, tropics that it of this and quality research is finds of food results stated have solutions crops at the achievement imprwement in the humid Institute, contribute by testing, The small target with allow 21. to the farmer quantity end encouraging research. ITT!. from application the Institute and subhumid essential collaborating research the small by IITA a mandate of its farmers, feedback IITA does not agencies results farmer, to work directly so as to considers and other testing recognizes access is to try ways and means through the farmer fields. in Africa, an objective a low level conditions. in the subhukd and 5wni.d ,?lnd cannot, bjitho3;t soil in terms Moreover, intensity. of protection underfer-tilitthe of pests, The small simultaneously against as much disease has ferJ of the of cash input:: and insect national progremmes to reach on farmers' particularly of its that further end little programme resources resenrch throllgh resistance 22. to purchased to increase tolerance inputs. productivity Therefore, xith with soil systems the development 2s possible objective several is of crops and with particularly and cropping to adverse This far serious difficult generally the present to attain have level is tropics sustnin going tropical diseases farmer on the pest:;, reasons. intensive The soils use with a low fertility of teci,nolog,r to restore aggressive prolonged degradation. and subhumid tends This azd crop The common practice ff)rllow after a few years environments in terms his result therefore of cultivation. and rainfall a degree by pexiods of vegetative humid are particularly risks by growing and weeds end also therefore same field. erosion of temperature of providing to minimize has the failure. a number of crops - 13- 23. Shifting cultivation but tries With constitutes to achieve population a stable equilibrium growth, soil fertility land with use system the farmers which hasrelatively at a low human to reduce decrease low productivity population the fallow progressively. density. period. environment are forced however, and In consequence, ecosystem stability 24. One way of meeting to develop the and cropping of single introduction of Africa. productive crops the challenge systems before which of the soil IITA reduce this as outlined or avoid IITA for in its this mandate period land is, while therefore, maintaining practices rotations and the population land-use systems. fallow capacity or other through problem allow appropriate management to introduce of mechanization urban In solving systems farming. may be able which This some degree feed the of commercial may help growing 250 The overall strategy of the the Institute Institute crops in attempting tropical for to solve regions, On the integrated of the these significant mainly other problems through is two-pronged. ments in Institute management systems. 26. On the ability is developing which one hand, key staple aims at introducing of the and disease. productivity imprweh;and, the and crop farming some of the food highe-yielding and resistance new approaches the to pest total and technologies land aim at increasing tropical The research of activities: (a) (b) (c) (d) the the the the programmes Systems of the Institute (FSP) are, therefore, organized in four main groups Farming Tuber Grain Cereal Programme end Root Crop Imprwement Legume Imprwement Improvement Programme Programme (CLIP) (CIP) (TRIP) Programme These research ported statistics is the general unit, activities are carried facilities out by multi-disciplinary including unit. support are also programmes respective in its teams laboratories, Each of the respective fields teams which a germplasm multi-disciplinary of competence are supunit, under and of the a teams by a number of service aa for a station training and with programmes research management activities the logistic responsible guidance of a Conference responsible research is the for fields. and Training regional Tne overall Programme. national coordination Director These multi-disciplinary cooperative of the of Research. in their end training responsibility - 14 - 27. Organization with X. these Institute's within overall programmes organizational is discussed structure in more detail and its in each of the by the Chapters Panal dealing on the programmes. General considerationsand recommendations operation are presented in Chapter 28. The programmes problems as rice, A major research led IITA knowledge maize, effort areas axe at different in and germplasm cowpea, yams, stages but which etc. inception This Several of development. also because existed when IITA This of the started is not only because differences on such sf the crops 29. collect to the which mandate started, factors encountered each area considerable to work in avdlable was made at the available of the they scientific Institute. of IITA undertaking, investigations of the (and is still being revealed crops pursued) relevant to and compile knowledge and practical experience hcwever, on the which Moreover, some gaps in the IITA to embark on some fundamental in which Institute are grown. had been little necessary with but effort too and the a considerabie before not only systems particular appropriate recognizes thefor its to prwide basic environments crops were inciuded although of the it investigated, and better Research to gain in the body of knowledge and experience of tropical had been acquired to define agriculture., able growth in tropical quantify workers research there@ was thought themselves regions, This knowledge of soil, some of the and elements tropical methods. main site basic familiarized of the research that total 30. IITA usually priorities suffers countries IITA its extensive conditions some of the were also and plant is still limited crops I pests and diseases an understanding tropics and to IITA which and fnrming of the explore increasingly it needs climate contains underway. a range and humid However, of ecological environments conditions of subhumid programme. S.urveys and other both scarce. from have been conducted institutions in It number in Nigeria the while and some other major the problems information for difficult has different and socioeconomic countries for in Africa ;tvailat'ie :ild dirferen-1; by iire to identify and diversity crops physical, research. a.;.d data IITA These pro~olems loom large was9 therefore , particularly as each crop biological to estai;li:% importance in among different different end regions. faces into of the other account economic cor&raj.n-ts, 39. problems the tropics, in priority with setting of other particular would and programme IARCs to its reference be TRIP, balance commodity as it the order also of given has to take In the humid importance contributions by progremmes programmes. However, and subhumid to Africa, CIP and GLIP. commodities - 15 0 the which IITA fact puts that the to IRRI order is conducting for major work on rice in its and CIMMYT major on these programmes work crops it is in on maize for Africa, a to South difficulty are in GLIP and CIP. considered relation can provide a good basis of importance of the crop the oassava, more specific of research research es TRIP, With regard special the America further Chapter problems on which major in Africa, from III work is being done at CIAT, already of the with to these achieved crop the major differences to the case because of this of plant balance and Africa, discussed acoomplishments importance at IITA in problems in Africa, other. research is between and the tremendous in mwement The overall material of resource one continent to VI dealing allocation These questions examined in Chapters specific ProgrTmes.. programmes X on Organization Part of IITA's agriculture and in the the Board other that and lanagement. to gathering establish in Africa. of IITA agriculture conditions Since the IITA essential problems selected and its a better This under of knowledge trials the and understanding sites in concern to by a growing appropriate conditions. in the transition subhumid area in the high are more at On&, ofthe near substation and conclusions of 32. tropical Nigeria within tackle approach was to countries the of imprwed cooperative on different most rainfall production in the was encouraged high crop mein site was not place problems 33. tropics between rainfall A contrast and in these tropical Harcourt, in in exists the humid forest the two zones, between the tropics. it belt site River was felt where State this was located to establish of shifting a substation cultivation complex. Port has begun. An 80-hectare The Panel was recently of Nigeria, substation and established development general findings and the visited III. ere presented Chapter mandate of defining 34. gradual ,The present process and progremmes the problems in which among all of IITA are, therefore, of IITA the reflects result that of a ob one of the and of progressive mandate works. it the adjustments of the jectives problems of the of these progranunes experience visits and methods. and of the most challenging since it difficulties, The complexity environment tasks the of the The Institute in with Panel in developing national through Chapter XI. has probably its IARCs in the sufficient by the CGTAP system. research strength a number As a result cooperative and '. Institute before were has been cautious to develop sharing assessed activities ere reported was essential progrannnes at headquarters findings programmes. of country These cooperative and its and conclusions - 16 - 35. Institute Before In the going following into the IITA, chapters, details although integrated an assessment of its of this faced mandate with a very is made of the Panel achievements programme mandate, a clear of the areas. its to be of is in the that implementation regarding broad specific wishes and complex strategy, assessment , the research to underline set conviction objectives, approach. now commended for having developed a coherent and well programmes based upon a sound multidisciplinary -17- CHAPTER III. (i) Introduction FARMING SYSTEKS PROGRAMME Objective 36. crop efficient feasible fallow. The objective management than While of the Farming the Systems humid existing food of food Programme and subhumid crops systems between crop (FSP) is to develop will methods enable of more and land use for tropics shifting food which and sustained'produotion can be realized recognizing the FSP concentrates Review The original degree Early years able from concept staff and until to their that explore of IITA arrivals fertility what under to be technically of annual and economically cultivation crops, farming and bush crops systems. perennial interactions on the and livestock, Historical components of tropical 37. a lesser was as an institute to overcome in specialist they the concerned with soil with During and - to shifting soil the chemist, - crop and soil management problems associated pedologist, focus. in projects to create this cultivation. soil were in crop While physicist largely preliminary knowledge it 1968/69 - nematologist, - reflected as relevant A proposal by the should (e.g. Board (one approach regarded viewpoints. was initiated a programme 1971, scientists to make advances the three in to with early current 1972. disciplinary the soil improvement was clear programmes breeder) in and FSP was accepted scientists across basis that economist they of Trustees , agronomists programmes of whom had been appointed as a vegetable scientists were with also placed and agricultural be affiliated nematology, FSP, other FSP than who had responsibilities FSP on the programme. focus from within within structure to ensure microbiology) had more identification any other 38. given More purposeful to devising previous further other programmed evaluation Since time IITA*s (excluding area: economist leader FSP was achieved aimed the at facilitating programme Deputy conducive that relative results. the Director in mid-1973 collaborative current General. is when attention research. leader Current research objective; in within structured, and concerns was An April FSP a FSP structure agricultural when the to develop and with carefully real-world became its to collaborative to the 1977 are: was appointed a group programmes; FSP research purposefully and well-defined of FSP research inception in programme's 39. staff 1969 and to date, devoted approximate man-years of senior by broad administration) to FSP have been as follows, disciplinary - 18 - Agricultural Agricultural Cropping Land'knagement Organization and Research Strategy Economics Engineering Systems and Soils 11.2 man-years Crop Management Pest Management 5*5 31.7 10.0 21.7 46.1 40. hierarchy scientists allocation to other With 18 senior Leader of leadership scientists, (Assistant within six the table This areas the FSP is Director on page table through the the largest but of IITA's there with areas the is progremmes. otherwise Sackgrounds FSP is 'led of FSP current FSP and six specified, time by a Programme level) no formal programme. The disciplinary project are shown in between IITA individual project areas Regional relation are: the programmes. 19 together a guide designated to their within interdisciplinary illustrates having multidisciplinary of involvement organized. farming other the with team approach in the of FSP with interdisciplinary the project 1. scientists varying which degrees FSP is As presently systems conditions in Analysis: to soil analysis information of existing economic for the and climates, basic the and social so as tc provide ii. Cropping crop developed systems. iii. Pest Management: methods Systems: in CIP, combinations project areas. development and TRIP, and testing including together - important of appropriate use of c+l.tivers other crops farming and sequences, GLIP, end vegetables development to overcome the insects and soil the the soils. development to land such as plantain in tropical of environmentally the problems and testing economically acceptable iv. posed by weeds, Land Nanagement: land fragile V. and diseases. development constraints and testing of methods to use of of management and conservation to continuous and testing the development tropical Management: overcome Energy which economically of implements labor crop constraints production and machinery exist in and processing. The results area : from the which can help to relieve relation development, above project areas are combined and employed in the sixth project - 19 - Allocation of'FSP Regional Analysis Principal Cropp. Synts. Staff Betkeen Project Areas Land Vtiliz. M M S L L S ..-..Other Progrs. M Discipline A&Y. Economist NO. 2 2 1 4" 1 1 Pest I' glnt L S M M M Land M' gmt S L S S S M S M M Energy wgmt L Agronomist Heed Scientist Entomologist Nematologist Climatologist Pedologist Soil Soil Soil Agric. Other Chemist Fertility Physics Engineering Eng. Programmes 1 1 1 M L S M I M M Le S S Nicrobiology 1 1 3 lb S L L LC Ld M M S FAO Agric. M = Major involvement L t Limited involvement S 55 Service function a - on secondment from COPP; visiting scientist. b - Project c - Breeders d - Pathologists e - Agronomist Leader, FAO African project Rural to terminate Storage Center. in April 1978. 0ne of the four is a and physiologists from Crop from Crop from Crop Improvement Improvement Programmes. Programmes. Progrsmmes. Improvement vi. Land Utilization and adaptation use for and land and Evaluation: of appropriate different work the systems development, of crop evaluation management environments. in problem identification Pest and technology The Land Management, The major interdisciplinary i,e. in Regional areas input formally has evolved than a major of FSP is evaluation, four tend Management Analysis of research and in Land Utilization Systems, by a wide and Evaluation. interdisciplinarybase, problem-oriented and kergy a major only to have Though - Cropping supported set in since 1977, Management from - while a narrower of disciplines. 4 1 ‘I research implemented gradually initially purpose the above research strategy based on projest areas orientation 1974 and represents a more purposeful prevailed. of FSP research management; principles FSP research agro-climatic soil base status to yield rather location-specific the programmePs for for crop modification on major this typology soiis; blueprints concern by is and land 42, for to It develop is not improved methods of crop and land proven are end, major subhumid)", high end make available These methods To this within (humid, basic rocks, typologies on rainfall from resource; hydromorphic) programmes. and practices as foundations priorities zones. soils); soil characteristics of the cropping management. national agricultural is based soils (upland, on the derived land aimed to serve are focussed At present (low catenary systems base status position used,; ; principal and major components constraints pressure to production. (ii) Socioeconomic The appraisal pertinent to FSP. Studies from IITA an economic is the and social view of the of existing and potential economists farming 43. systems in responsibility two agricultural Objectives 44. bility Relative within (a) help to IITA's mandate, social, or may in the objectives of the agricultural factors which of means a view economics capa- FSP are identify currently, foodcrops; assess the stated to be to:economic the future, and technical limit the of production alternative with (b) socioeconomic farmers' implications production of increasing and income - 21 - to crop (i) guiding technologies farmer the research which his priorities and (ii) would present for helping practices; the Institute end foodto the cooperating small (c) assess agencies; than for to specify be more attractive and marketing increase infrastructural, input require- ments necessary production; (d) assist in the for a sustained in foodcrop professional the tropics. training of agricultural economists Scope and Achievements 45. systems the properly To date, and the not off-farm sooio-economic collaborative research design in these variety has fooussed and evaluation areas. of cooperative etc. on studies of IITA exist, on indigenous findings. research farming While research problems of markets, infrastructure, has quite been undertaken to farms) surveys research a great 46. scientists the types in-depth In addition use of unit of field research farmer projects with Institute and two crops and a in the. (cover-crop experiments, to evaluate surveys input physical, field proposed trials, crop out: testing, surveys simulation of specific and land management practices, have involved have been carried baseline level. agro-economic most important and subhumid Assistance land utilization at the village biotic These studies factors limiting substantial of the humid and have contributed tropics. been given in to national significantly to better specification and economic production African has also 47. major Future agencies in the development of systems Ghana and Cameroon. Trends Emphasis will surveys designed continue systems. to to identify collect and (c) will to be on the Priority farm will level information within and imprwed to agro-economic production be given problems to: for economics (a) FSP;(b) crops of crop in other and farm management limited with in the of farming surveys a small number of intensive short-term, collaboration scientists 48. aspects visit CIP, design agro-economic on specific methods GLIP and TRIP; and evaluation also and farming collaboration FSP and with modelling of innovative be given and land management. alternative a Some attention crop of possible systems. - 22 - Issues 39. of the capability is Gne of the programme to his within (and two economists and the FSP is necessity closer for it for administrative desir'able) is currently for the it leader leader is of FSP. that staff continue Given the to the ccmplexity role economics Also, in the it choice to play apparent to of the a strong coordinating agricultural assist crop analytical of hypotheses in addition necessary duties, to one than the to two senior positions. FSP economists practices of crop would their and the been possible include conception influence of alternate programmes. resensch farmers' it, their relationships 50. strategies and management has not the Institute's management economic about acceptable towards In consequence, Such studies, decision-making on their as it is to undertake the testing of risk aimed at facilitating motivations design and land use systems to fagement col!aborators P.es^arc:C. 02 great the emphasis ?,-;roromi.(X are ready 70. in this crop will technology mixtures projects. therefore in mix-tures, interactions studies, mixtures crop be placed on understanding indigenous principles Suitability study. intercropping. principles management studies specific sequence cropping and post ::~:ch fqr rotatior climatological and fertilizer and soil locations. of cwer-crops use in the - 27 - 71. Cultivaxs cropping developed systems, project emphasis for which to the work by the for area* will of the Crop Improvement over Programmes range and others'will of environments be used by the in model evaluation a wider FSP Land Utilization 72. Additional be given to the problems of food crop production that in the exe humid tropics complementary promising intercropping Crop Improvement combinations and sequences be tested. Progremmes,will (v) Pest (1) Management The present (a) pest mamagement programme economically practices being cultural studies appropriate developed tid aims at: sound pest of land and emphasis to systems within control and flora which which end a better to gain against of: of a range cropping yields resistant (including agronomic crop improvement systems." using Objectives 73. "developing management crop on maximizing and the and environmentally management FSP, with biological pest techniques minimum use of agrochemicals, on the pest of indigenous of the and modified regulatory and the will the activities take (b) conducting fauna operate agricultural understanding and associated systems background place." in the field mechanisms in such systems development specific "to "to evaluate increase input (2) It (a) (b) also includes Weed science: of weed control Nematology: cultivaxs, live mulches patholoq practices." minimum farmer effectiveness mixed crop rotations practices in selected and stabilize crop methods suppressing such as nematode and modifying from the various nematode and intercroppingh as an input (c) Plant programmes, Organization 74. olusion scientists From its in the inception ITTA core FSP has had nematology were located of a group project, within which the of Centre and weed science crop for imprwement Overseas Pest specifically positions, progremmes~ Research designed while Inin (COPR) entomology and pathology working on a special was not - 28 - relation conducts nem~tologi.st, to FSP's studies needs , provided on insect of the provide three 3 entomology in positions in FSP. This projest a pest anaiyst, now na.nageil!e i': populations cropping mixtures. Recently merit group, April consisting COPR entomologists was formed. in FSP. and a residue and the weed scientist The COPR project ternin,-te:: 1978, and will two vacancies Scope and major achievements studies of lima sequences under have prwided bean, with varying a basis for identification identification patcntia.1; e;;peci;?lly ~6 in of :cjemato P of (:we1 the study reiz-Lj.0~ :zrcA,:‘ , of -L-o ,nj : j.:n;y cowpea and yams; cultural practices, 75* Hematology cultivars resis-taz"-t nemFt3d3 tilleze or0 9:; , and crop incidence nematode-suppressi% -nd mulching. lieod cor-r;rol that mulching aild rice; publication management through and spread research has provided in the bzeic subhumid information environment the need for for weeds. cass-.va, on weeds rcl.at,i;qy Fi (lid near IITA. , a second a first /16. cropping mixt!ue::; to '-ri U ,--JF U cron sgs-tams and management sprendirgcrops of herbicide materials have indicated and certain pie-ted cowpf'.k, of major c,2n obviate substitute can effectively methods wee,?i-?fT in 10~ rates include: maize needs; Early pest effectiveiy suppress for yams, in ?:?n3 ::eeG.n,o; or kJ0r.i: cocpotato, sy~'iems; ~oyherj.~, ecology sweet aanuel. $L-udier: cropping chemical weed control weed incidence and spread selected of an illustrated research between efforts sole :areed identification indicate crops that 77. pest significant striking intercropping infoznrtion differences ix patte?n:;. can be obtained incidence interdisciplinary exist teams, and that and various Future '18. conditions pest into Trends Integrated studies in on pest cropping particular In mancagement VJill systems situations; the with pest and land assess basis crop for found be conducted mezagement interactions rational in input to: characteri.7? pe:>t of different components; design. be conducted practices; betweei; identif;: differer.i ,:lan>Zement a-..1 ecoI.ogic::l agro- majo:-, ccnstraints complex systems and provide collaboration on major of pest or modified specialists, biological existing studic~: , ,.iill systems. species 79. pred.ict promising b-ottoms Studies pest on indigenous problems tillage, which identified will systems rney arise in will with be the important practices development in this programme so as to Also, valley given or changes therefrom. systems and zero FSP, e.g. be monitored. of hydromorphio - 29 - Issues 80. Success of the pest Completely to management programme integrated pest In addition, work This in pest might with senior will staff require balance is careful planning systems with and research the crop leadership. zation extensive collection beneficial interested currently to the appropriate to increase level in pest management carefully, teams in farming and coordinated have been difficult improvement achieve, should Effective and levels time-consuming of specialiand involves end in and mutually institutions and entomology staff and to increasing routine management be studied of skill programmes. sampling and evaluation collaboration in similar required support their ecology and a high level in identification be an area national routine scientists. scientists interaction. does not appear of organisms, of effective of data. and interaction problems. is staff difficult, in order for by the and international work in nematology Training should from be given some of this Much of the has to be conducted of support and consideration to free productive this potential 81. as the While required FSP has no pathologists, expertise is available to have any adverse effec-t in the Crop Improvement Programmes. - (vi) Land Utilization The objective cultivation into of land Systems of the improved Land Utilization subhumid on soil lend use systems. types project is to prwide through is a viable the alternative of nnd and Objectives 82. to shifting FSP research practices humid Major tropics, in the and humid tropics, The emphasis which synthesis subhumid on principles in the management are important especially in Africa. Achievements Zero and minimum tillage soil fertility that in systems. effective A five-year techniques under study these both on high methods superior erosion have been adapted moderate base, - with input crop low-activity residues tillage to minimize input in yields, systems. and with and vegetable manageallow a subt-umid mulch and :.ere soils maize soil erosion and high 83. farming srea and to maintain has demonstrated used as surface have proved more profitable controlling and maintaining and managerially valley bottoms to conventional 84. improved Hydromorphic water Systems have been shown to be very are suitable use are being and associated for tested for productive, rice the soils integrated -which and nutrient of crop - management and land bottoms valley intensive upland production. ment of toposequences -3% better studies influence labor utilization. This the toxicity slopes programne effect effects and the related land mwagement especially prwided of the also and soi1 the a better influence nutrition. of have demonstrated of soil moisture of iron on higher of site on crop on rice performance, They have bottoms, management status disease. on rice understanding soil types in valley of water and of the effect on nitrogen Future trends to focus high-rainfall, methods land in the emphasis inputs use; subhumid - such on: defining r;.cid-soil which will further and humid for as water fertility minimiza evaluation 2nd. i;nii speci-?yadieroi: rjero ej':; tile mechanithe of Research in the future is likely 85 management practices with potential for ing tillxge continuing valle;r zation economic land development degradation toposequence and the role sequences and on selected work, - in xd effects of soil on ILTA, the bottoms, underintensified sites with of various environments; management ZCXG of Afriy-;; developing malxgement, on methodology development. and cropping toposequenoe Issues 86. (a) T!:e pace humid careful (b) !lork would sites links and direction with consideration. of efforts low-base, to expand work into needs and crop and it few national the tropics low-activity soil soils parameters a very with on the relationship involves there spread benefits. of valley high lands be impossible unless could to were IITA between a. great do this early expansion resources bottom crops deal performance of resources, on more than oollaboration with tco iands is poorly thinly, for programmes. cc:~comittCant The development production bec,xse areas lands tropics. heavily regi ens. where Too rapid developed without intensified priority in those proportion th:;t such depend and subhumid would specific of rice of their such and other potential, of high especially a substantial estimate of the humid in development factors represent I@ their of t:he landscape. constitute upox social The priority FSP scientists at least for and economic - 31 - (vii) Farm Implements The objective farm tools farming and Nachinerx of this progranune hardship, is to develop increase low-energy the economic demanding, fit range inexpensive, into the Objectives 87. simple tropical farmers. which systems reduce human productivity, of Africa, and are within of African Scope and major achievements of farm agricultural three land implements commodity and machinery The work prograznmes. planting Rural ongoing, is the responsibility to cropping African (stationed with for the has been on the on small ,Project of one senior systems, farms. a number of land The development at IITA) development engineers. relates 88, utilization Development and the for and two assistant of implements which of rice is Bnphasis Storage preparation, and weeding work has been complemented studying and cassava Applying tools. zero Also, post-harvest manufacturers of agricultural by an FAO African handling machinery is and storage. Cooperation in particular harvesters. tillage crop harvesting and imprwed for techniques, combinations storage. combined with coverccrops small fields of crops cultivars or mulches, will require farms on small and 89. adapted require cultivation of different more energy on scattered handling and post-harvest and harvesting. largely harvesting Africa. not is Use of improved may necessitate new adaptations of tools weeding 90, for the solve land Trypanosomiasis preparation, and subhumid problem, humid this end other seeding, lowlands the prwided diseases weeding, cost of tropical prevent Small the use of draught transport animals and on-farm in most of tractors may ultimately prohibitive. of a jab-planter tilled applicator zero the tillage small are being for sowing sowing machine A commerand protocooperation in 91. zero for cially promising type with tractor, Some accomplishments tiilage systems within use on narrow available, for machines cultivated have been the ower-crops strips development or mulches droplet and a hand-pushed or on conventionally controlled application rice rice and cassava made to farming by the drying adapt in Asia, FAO African and storage in seedbeds. systems, in p-wheel battery-operated herbicide suited and pesticide to harvesting Attempts developed for has been found developed manufacturers. originally are being "Landmaster" to African Rural structures conditions. Storage for Project maize. has shown Using 92. the Work on post-harvest suitability technology of simply-constructed - 32 - natural production three aspects will invslve techniques air years, circulation, of a second and will these crop. extend its cribs work It permit earlier FAO project harvesting is being rice and, in some CRSOS, for another :nd :-ro;:l; ~ro~l.1.d~:ro'r:?,'ci?~ u of ,:::propri;,te i.: cor-.si,'ere+ SOW The present would continued investigatory and follow-l;p to grain appear legumes, that other, and yam stortise of cassava documentation through processing. by the on the cooperation part of 11~4's essenLia1 period, tFe have been completed end of the with national projected the one hand and,on future core application programmes. programne. iteither of these to be a necessary Futwe trends Long-term :droplet tools use, for goals are local assembly or manufacture and insecticides, spreaders, irrigated reducing clearing, rice tools, of mulch design fields. enera plante-n ;!I.; COY'of I:( ;:r:i.z~c:'!ide to 93,. trolled control rur:L vation applicators seeders uplanu of herbicides and fertilizer crops and flood energy in land machinery, involved. and deve7.0pmant j:i$cr-rr,:,r projpc-l;s sited Other hanri or mechanized modification and hand pushed, of existing and equipment sources watershed development and nonsei'- of water. (viii) LIajor Issues structure: has been difficult six that designated a problem-based with land The Panel to find project areas structure the ti-ere observes a suitable might crop is this prwisior: that, given its cgmplejcit.;, structure but i.e. in there Perhaps cro>pinC 'our i.::2t:li t5e ;,nd for have it organizational be more suitabie. areas, reslilt only would for 940 FSP. Organizational At present, might and diversity, been suggestions management systems of six Assistant scientists. and pest project have been identified, management be imprwed management, paean. Also, to provide by combining at present leadership management; oRe Ler:xl, Director, to a multidisciplinary gro>Jp o? 18 t:e,j.or 950 in Staffing FSP over time feels imminent and staff that balance: There is need to examine is in there needed. land the bairtnce staff t‘ :e Also, of dL ,~r,j.~~lii:es flc?xi'%.liig. progr:mme 1’ 0, evaluation trial sites, and cropping Programmes etc. oapaoitisbreeding 9~ oh+eotives, be useful off-station Crop Improvement identifyin(y 11 General Conclusions and Recommendaticns .-.-..-I_. multidisciplinary Ths--.-Pane!-.. L -- commends the wide-based, additior +o scientific which knowledge which this of farming programme s,ystems components show promise work of the has r-educed, efforts to of makine: an impact ?'SP ir t'-is fi.eld, delrelop- tl7o considerable ment and the on the focus the problnrr work techniques. sat?s- of shifting nf the cult ivatiol-. It notes with approval the -. more precisely on the collaborative that the present load present develonment of new farrnii.r 103. factory TJ-e Panel considers _.---.-_ in that it places should organizational on the structure assistant? of FSP Icj not an impossible to methods Programme Leader. consideration ??e given of providing and rer-mmer.:s ..- _ .._- --- that to the leader,, ---,.- -- -.- -- I/ Wheq presenting these conclusions and recommendations the Peel was aware tb-tt the across-centre review of farming systems research !Vfstripe analysis") was still under way. JCRISAT ,-nd IRRI, after CTA? It was real.ized that the stripe review team, when visiting and IITA, may develop general conclusions on farming systems research at the TARCs wh';ch may pnssibly go beyond those presented here. - 35 - It ship suggests that Leader9 the this could be done by the more direct respective of the in the selection or appointment for thus of a Deputy leaderpossible making it Programme to specify or by placing responsibility sub-progrnmmes, areas sub-programme on other individuals responsibilities units feels change, It arises, also project more precisely. Some consolidation of sub-programme may also that except believes the be desirable. balance that that within between below disciplines in the in with in the programme for does not, &ricultural its .the should 104. The Panel need any major Engineering. opportunity have some direct The Panel as mentioned recommendations general broad crop agronomy the should be strengthened experience and suggests responsibility recognizes the should pursuit to require the an agronomist Land Utilization the erea. subhumid witi1i.n the notes the climatic well-defined problems that continued there limits in the that is no in within zone 105. the valuable have the first work done within end considers ecological humid work sharp the which 106. that zones, this zone, and consolidation priority. different gradually. somewhat of this It notes work, that also for the zone are likely within boundeq between solutions, It that and recommends zone should an attempt methods considers science, review. relevant be developed two zones, should and recommends work subhumid be made to determine adapted. survey ecological FSP-devised The Panel and soil under all that might that It be successfully the balance between that work in economics, be kept analysis clim* should assessed tology ensure and more experiementally-oriented recommends data the work to existing pertaining work should on regional a region continually end utilized. are collected, 107. The Panel recommends the for that further attention associated soils, last to the should with be given to field statistically sites that experimental efficient and with work techniques, end reliable complex should crop 108. particularly designs cropping systems. problems developing on off-station it use on heterogenous In relation small point, recommends concentrate combinations upon a very number of carefully chosen, most promising, and sequences@ intention and the of the to Panel develop a more fundamental Such work that the depend further physiologi.caJ. could perhaps introduction initial use The P,anel commends the to intercropping to to other methods advantage approach modelling experience. and crop aspects combination problems. recommends should of such methods progremme on successful - 36 - 109. animals. Tine Panel recommends that TIT,4 should not engage in experimental work with 110. Tile Panel thev suggests FSP effort that,when but that end should arrangements. plantains speoifio effect be avoided. are logically Also, part t1.e Pa,rel 03 priority experiments considers croppin,: t'!-,t patter38 be included, wrk could plantain improvement may di1lAt.e the a&p- -fc?estry -to t‘ ic- ci;rren-L have a diluting on FSP and that work be rcstrir~+,4 contract (4 Rele-tive 111. Specific Conclusions and Recommendations Studies the substantial focus their contribution activities activities of this work. end it to F'SP 7Tzd.e b,- its on t':e on--?TC aspects i;:tegrnted eccno:,li:;tc: of fesmin~ wit? o+:ter m;>ltion ;2113': 1~2 to Socioeconomic The Pace1 commenis that It also the; s:lould agrees limiteu;,iisit r2nA -grces spt visit will em7. t;tet survey aspect surveys with hypotheses , purposefulEy FSP reseerzh, particul-cs use systems. z.re an essentiCal problems is viewed The 5ove a:way f ram broati specific honed tha-; choice inforn~tis~ the is sumre;--: to be taken aimed at obtaining relevant to farmers' approval, op~ort~~i-ty to investigate of cro? 112. prep;:red 'The P;?el agencies to play Africa in applauds in the 5, leading f?rm so far the role initiatives of field in the taken coordination by FSP in It of field cooperating that studie:: witli IITll nation,:' shoul4 :/it;'! in b., and other technology tropical conduct surveys. believes concerned adoption, decision-making, as these studies and farm/houseklold are pertinent relationships to FSP objectives. Relative to Land Zanegement The Panel integration and dependable conditions. The Panel in iJest future notes the It of this and Land Utilization extensive to aJld thorough into shifting land studies on the systems under soil enviro:;:?:el:t mrxy ?orT soil and information utilization which 113. end tile viable clim;Ltic commends the alternatives cultivation specified 114. soils in the valuable recommends and that work that done in the defining end characterizing :iork to this addition im:?ort;ni required bn Africa. amount of such pedol.o&cr-.l ?rork i:: be assessed no major pedology undertaken. - 37 - 115. that terms The Panel FSP should of cropping recommends decide capability, defined. that the benchmark the soils programme be assessed, in of the realistically and that how many of these can be investigated aims of any continuation programme be sharply 116. The Panel and that rainfall, believes the bearing that more effort of this should work should and other now be directed be towards constraints. the to soils outside receiving IITA, high main thrust areas in mind logistic 117. The Panel value of the sites, options highly commends work testing at It IITA urges on zero tillage that various the the work up to the should effort present, and the longupon supports term with off-station possible such further as may be neoessary ecological research to eetablish zones, technique. selected plan. other than At the now concentrate should to cover and in accordance investigate a systematic same time zero tillage. 118. The Panel increasing appropriate recognizes emphasis plant the wide-ranging studies. , possibly This work on soil physics, and supports project the with axea. on root biologists should be done in association Cropping Systems from the 119. extend The Panel the notes the increased and suggests series testing that the fertility of fertilizers possibility relationships on farmers' of using these and crop fields programmes manageto in national ment practices programmes, information on soil be considered. 120, The Panel continuation commends the in association past with work the on cover Cropping crop and mulches, studies. and supports its Systems - 38- 121. The Panel programme 'The Panei recommends Rhizobium IITA within that increased with attention be given to collaboration and that with an agreed GLIP in work joint 122. on the symbiosis be developed. cowpea and soybean, supports continued and nutrition. work on mycorrhizns in connection with t!:e :ror% on phosphorus 623. fertilizers of the project In tielw @stems necessarily areas, between that close the them. present in crop However, focus Panel association suggests between that the Land Management be ,$von -nd to ;i Cropping consideration more formal 124. connection believes Tne Panel studies canopies it tov.ards on crop w--.ter requirements l p2xtic~Yi:~rl.y there a::?. iigh-t in also reqiirements to t':le study significant of FSP target mid gas exchange of intercropping. agroclimatological ereas. are useful th2t re~s.ti.or believes the sl:ould :3e ' delimitation 2nd charactori,.?.tlon Relative to Cropping The Panel Systems by the It extent believes systems promising ecological of the that and crop land area exploratory the time management IITA'w work on possible has no?! come for: 325. crop was impressed the associations (a) testing practices, and combinations. most promising together within Ibadan is with the management of which techniques, site (b) in representative; concentrating a limited combinations sarily involving of the that adapted there to require not on more in-depth of well-chosen or sequences, close only studies, These studies but in prefer:~Ely crop will the to that on number characteristic necesspecialists ensure are interdisciplinaq FS? scientists Progr,ammes, materials cooperation, also order Crop improvement are breeding intercropping. that under in Africa developed 126. The Penel considers testing t'lese about throrough fcarmersl investigations It also reactions should to the be ex:.en::e:i t&t syst?m~ by multi-location information iir?d practices. controlled conditions. recommends proposed be ga~t!lered - 39of the work on vegetables tropics. as important Fiowever, Institute could 1270 it for offer The Panel that recognizes vegetable Research the systems interest in components of some farming the humid work institutes and subhumid cease. with vegetable recommends Horticultural advice breeding and other should The new Xigerian programmes and material. Relative 128. basic pest traditional overcome Relative 129. design volume 930. ing the to Weeds, Pests The Panel information on these and Diseases work pest (Pest Management) and weed science, cropping patterns the supports which has provid.ed of to a and under formation in order commends the on nematology in various collaboration systems. for cropping problems plans and improved pest problems management in priority Xngineerinq that work in the The Panel systems. m;anagement group and the and monitoring to Aqicultural lnne Panel agrees and development as the sprayer). The Panel believes agricultural number hand-pushed engineering sowing machine should focus on the interest of a limited jab-planter, of implements and machines and the of direct ultr+low to FSP (such that the demands and needs for engineers. from three two positions engineers work It (one (one on agricultural recommends senior engineer engineer engineeIc of and two and one within senior FSP can be met by two agricultural staffing support support of agricultural officers) officer). notes the close cooperation development farms. It to the prwision to, at most, reduction executive executive 131. suited and that senior The Panel for small should the final between believes should IITA that and the the manufacturers of implements cooperation and machines in the of new or adapted of sketches be left implements in most, if and machines in this all cases, not and medium-sized be limited design t,ask of IITA manufacturers. and development to the - 40 - CHapTERIV. (i> 132. scientific are the grown worldls Tropical 'IUBEZ AND ROOT IMPROVB4EINT PROGRAMBE(TRIP) root and tuber despite for crops the fact have received that amount countries. in yield will very of their little in the daily attention tropics food. from Roots crops the and tubers Introduction community, crops source major poorest Production this food many persons and subtropics are mainly m?ny of the depend upon these by small a substantial in many African Root and tuber benefit farmers, people. and imprwements immediately 133. hectares; area. of cassava amounts in Africa amounts total world in tropical to about Africa ~$4 million from is tons from 6 million world .'.fricn world of which (;,6 million tons). 367: in crop while to 5O$ of the production production respectively. on about countries tons) total is of 8% 6og". of the Kost of the Coast (0,6 tons 41% of the cassava of yems is g-rovm in Central 2 million are Ivory hectares 365 and 23$ come from West Africa production tons), potato. East production in Africa, Other million produces leading tons), potato tons is 307: are in Nigeria. Ghana (0,8 also The continent Pifrica and East Africa tons million world 19 million Togo (O,l output produced yam producing of the and Benin million Africa, total 6 million 15 million in Central of tile of sweet 55$ of the total and only of 4 million in Africa Of the in Africa. in produced 85 in West Africa. Tonet;leless, stock,;, Africa, 900 accessions India, Brazil. ",!~c pr;jgrp:?vF: from CUT; nnd thousand:; Indonesia have been introduce.:-; 518 and Puerto and others of related species - 43 - 147. notably Interspecific 2. glaziovii. IITA Africa stable Tanzania, breeding leaf clones in Plantation, crosses Nigeria, or CIAT in Zaire Seychelles have been made between of resistance One of these Latin America. clones levels cassaw is also and related from resistant Manihot clones to CBB. species, developed Mosaicmaterials lines Togo, Benin, Sources to CiXD were obtained of resistance at Koor resistant from have shown much higher as has resistance and India. include: into IITA root to CMD than Leone, Liberia, East Resistance to CMD and CBB in IITA has proven Cameroun, I.$%* of Latin cyanide, to CMD in Sierra Other achievements lines protein, incorporation lines, quality for yielding variation of good root of lines table characteristics with low processing. to A to at, for American higher Clones and Indian development and high use and for 149. large national MS 30211 and 30395,which IITA with are high wide genetic A rapid and highly and are being resistant multiplied. developed clones CMD and CBB, have been released number of seeds from in programmes Africa to national and Asia. progremmes have been distributed system IITA multiplication the CIAT has been modified, distribution 150. and is used to propagate in Nigeria. in Zaire is working - the with most promising to farmers The PRONAN project a veq staple serious food. Africa. disease - operate and insect together complex which is devastating disease threat to cassava, the major CP!D, CBB, cassava anthracnose (CAD) and a new pest to cassava and spider severe mite cassava mealybug to pose a grave 151. production problems, in east research and the on their of Latin in Central which Tne mealybug Zaire, to be especially immediate are recent for from of the investigation enemies. of expertise contract at present Africa, There ecology for - are apparently are is considered in Africa. that the especially the restricted b,y the rethese acceler- to and a few other countries and Central importance therefore, germplasm America attention. biology, Panel quiring pests ation the under centres problems of great Panel, cassava through that and in to cassava recommends including resistance introduction control with and concentrated introductions, in-depth of all studies parts evidence strengthening of facilities accessions of natural and control, screening available control CIAT and other of biological It is or similar genes, and and evaluation be undertaken, appropriate exploration, on biological close suggested arrangements, the work collaboration in biological control. -44- 152. effort The Panel recognizes which has permitted them under the field Panel the quality of the advances plant in pathology understanding input in the team signifioant conditions. considers that CMD and CBB and overcoming 153. is Finally, supports the work for of IITA areas in where cassava improvement limiting newing a possible production TRIP in keeping dilute breakthrough a strong these CMD end CBB are serious. and in The Panel other emphasis efforts. on cassava, activities Iwhich might b. Yams Yams axe B favourite and the forest regard. Yems are the worldwide btiiiding at the second crop for which IITA, collection in its this mandate, mandate, has bee:? en;oined IITA to Pacific areas of Africa, food in the humid source perhaps and subhumid second in tropical for importance countrias the of Islands. A major yams are of carbohydrates inhabitr:,--65. 154. Africa of the in this only- to c~ss.:v.: 155. accept on the aimed responsibility. up of a large of yields and production work, In interpreting germplasm and production of yems face the crop did not has uonce-trated of p:>ogr:mTe'2 and the technolob;y, a number produce are initiation improvement 156.. The imprwement (i) (ii) (iii) prior amounts yields high labour (iv> although insects important. of probli:ms: significant to IITA's of viable are usually seeds; low and storage required is in terms losses significa;lt; material, range (YVD) of is of planting in ' p u.t- b are the crop and staking; affected by a limited disease and diseases, the yam virus 157. so far selection. IITA began its yem improvement comprised obtaining which that but noted the programme principally of true entirely about seeds six in years ago wit11 the rotundata for have breeding been collectjon and evaluation constitutes of a germplasm an important The Panel step of local. accessions. Propress and has been modest Dioscorea offers new prospects 70,000 seeds of 2. rotundata distributed. - 45 - 158. (1,300 Rapid clones lines advances originating with to quality, are being from yield high made in seedlings) potential, and pests, the breeding programme agronomic storage, using characters, seed propegation schemes better nutritional The Panel to tuber and recognizes and population improved improved to real local continue other are the improvement improved systems. for the identify types, utilizational that there resistance diseases and adaptability for that the first time, work this yam (2. IITA advances recommends species (D. plans should farming is now, potential improvement of :I'I:ite yams and recommends to be supported. yam species of varying (2. alata, these s, dumetorum, other control. on erfort a 159. D. e, Apart from white rotunda-La), to expand that research D. esculenta, areaso however, as planned and D. bulbifera) are made in floral rotundata), of improved in tropical importance in t(lie major yam-producing species, The Panel, the will major as collections accelerate impact programme induction should to inclllde and sex expression to be concentrated species expects which that will other continue the The Panel most important the and that white Africa. be maintained and sources production on yam production of genetic diversity. this have yam materials CO Sweet Potato Sweet potato food potential infertile animal feeds. clones on sweet of works serving stimulating is in the third priority Africa to provide primarily Africa while work centre, AVRDC on sweet potato in for root because crop of its Research Asia. confining holding on the crop. potato. Africa are in sweet (SPVD). in from developing improved clones from North a the East potato sweet Africa. viruses, potato weevils, of which the Cyla:: IITA its in This TRIP, crop ability ground since to cwer role it is recognized high yields as a (AVRDC) of proleadership for its crop soils, potato, for in many parts of Africa. a protective appears to have an 160. imports& as an important on somewhat source also viding to in tropical produce and to serve Centre as that .The Asian Vegetable and Development sees its worldwide improved responsibilities and providing commends IITA as a documentation and coordinating efforts pests with conferences, The Panel collaborative 161, flies The major are the of sweet Africa of virus a group puncticollis most important in Nest vectors is the and Cylas disease formicarius complex Aphids and jrhite of important 162. Substantial pool America, progress formed from and Asia. has been achieved seed introductions germplasm and South many countries in Africa, - 46 - 163. Sources of improved resistance to the sweet resistant, the potato high weevil (Cylas puncticollis) have of have been identified; been produced; fresh roots showed high six in four yield many weevil new clones months potentials if clones Sudan, and virus yielding more than wlnile clones other produced planted by IITA in the have yielded wet season, season. dry JO tons/ha clones when grown during 164. Nigeris. The most promising Some IITA Zaire, Rwanda, countries. and South have been supplied potato extent clones Sri Ethiopia, Lnnka, to some interested are used in planted Sierra to these agencies Leone, varieties in improved av,?i.lable sweet on the Liberia, in i.n Cameroun, the Africa AVXDC, USA and Papua N~;J @dinea. to countric;s 90 dnt a are zs yet respective , North of areas and.to Many improved America and Asia, work level. clones seeds have been supplied AVFUX. improvement, by farmers increase season. 165. it high The Pa.nel commends the at its weevil-resistant on sweet potato The ndioption could during greatly the dry and recnamend.~ th.at of presently food ;ind feed available, supppl,ies be continued yielding, present in ma3y parts of Africa, especially bJ> a. Future Gas savk Trends was informed work will Africa; that the staff to intend concentrate to develop the.ir iActivities 166. the The Panel following lines: breeding Central quality; continue on resistance and to CAD in to diseases such as C!YlDand CD% in general, resistance low cyanide will before to insects; content (0 and development eating and a parts of clones with (ii) increased green matter (iii) efforts and improved to the be directed for pests it these mealybug only to other spider of time mite problems, is probably spread of Africa; Agronomic i;lcrease clo,-.es be paid expected yielding are studies and will adopted to clonal to increase clones about of the most promising Increasing efforts cooperative clones will ~1s these will is national and highbecome and diseases. become especially elsewhere. multiplication important for attention progremmes programmes. The demand for as new pest-resistant the threat of pests are released, and as governments more concerned 367. The programme will concentrate work on seed production culture is also and on breeding planned. and improvement of D. rotundata. Intensive on tissue c .. Sweet Potato High dry will will matter the yield major and resistance objectives and imprwed clones in to economically in breeding quality, free disease developing forms, important dise;i.ses Other zreas rapid and of remain be: sweet potato. 168. insects emphasis in storability clones. m.ethode for multiplication certain of desirable desirable and induction of flc:Iering (vi) Issues The Panel and resources balance respect should feels there is need to maintain crops the for with priorities a balance which between the investment 2nd that advancement of among the several crops. of additional It is crop of basic increasing demand for this presents on production. prevent mandate. uniform techniques collaboration at present approach the movement of vegetatively seriously It trials. plant is propagated hamper the root successful will cooperative hoped that imprwement. programmes, Also;IITA area adequately. cnssava in its and the will may find depth not it TRIP is and state responsible, of scientific 169. time the with a be compatible to each of the 170. of IITA divert difficult Operation involvement, TRIP from to There to staff is and management require its major and handle also increasing programmes; early impact task study. such commitments demands in this multiplication a challenge -171. clones attempt of IITA-imprwed to the in national achieve TRIP progrzmme 172. crops Quarantine in the axeas regulations of IITA's culture in this accept close this problem; Such restrictions variety with there in propagating or prevent disease-free establishment development planting help in authorities of international of tissue is hoped that autllorities, that materials. IITA and transporting quarantine materials, resolving will no assurance of plant between qusrsntine to the mwement of responsibility 173. cassava The relationship are major following issues. and division In this and CIAT for Panel for CIAT regard, the Quinquennial Review made the recommendations:.... - 48 - "that CIAT and IITA for the discuss and (enter into an agreement components CUT, than by on several and s:lould African breeding at IITR, be Any prance- on responsibility constituting concentrating root crops, be more actively common cassava ;lrork i;rill bdc the various research on cassava. rather IARC programme exclusively concerned mosaic exists on cassava with only Africa. in has a more comprehensive programme Since Africa, physically obvioiLsly anl rzreed have to for the continue breeding include Africavl reqonsibilities work should s2.feg-uml.s cassava discllcsed t!lat the matter of IITd giSdc3nCe". upon by IITA and CIAT. men-t or sgreemznt no risks Americ.as made should 2e to ens’ into thic: of introducing c>n occur. by the it then mosai-: the-, for The Panel fort)icoming be referred recommends to TAC be studi.i:d czrd. -t'lat . ~Fuir.quen25.a.!. Review policy 174. .apprsved of The IITA by ti:n in Review Pariel is That aware that Leaders qreement, IITA a wri-tten of IIT:; although the its agreement and CUT role appareY:-tl;; understarding rdas di:;cllsse;i 'lever or as ,;‘ prove3 773 'L;: t‘ ?? c;~ssava Programme and a senior ::tilir: j.yi;ila,i;r)y IIT4 December for foliows:.... 1973. Centre in part, Directors, does speil collaboration. globai out in some de-tail strtes for Par each of the tile nro~::ram!le:: relationships, and guidelines as IXIAT plasm Vith holds responsibilities and organizing such activities the world ge?mconferences. compilation respect of bibliography, to cassava For Latin the following maintaining international improvement, America reasons: in Latin while (1) collection ho:Jever, IITA CIA7 LIPS t!le has that to tile for biocul-li- responsibility Africa,for logical vation (2) strict Meetings the environmental, and Africa; d*ze to the >nd cultural differences with,respect America material and (3) end use of cassava regionat quarantine difficulties i.n movement of plant regulations; based international workshops be held in the existprogrpjmmes. to ence of two regionally on subjects, should continent cassava and conferences respective specific continental insti.tuteVf. -49- 175. cassava: concerted The IITA Review Panel complex considers in defining that the major different the following exists that mosaic list roles of factors in Africa exist; is which (3) of mejor in deserves importance and illustrative ( 1) a major local research institutes of the respective quarantine in languages, cassava major mite of GIRT and IITA of diseases (2) quite in are and insects efforts; training at IITA; IITA problems Spanish training local at CUT occur but progrsmmes conditions and English in America; disease; are not different, each emphasizes or English does not for Africa. is dise,lse to in South and conducts end rWench for and (5) serious The threat that (4) African spider they reason has shouldered while responsibility serious mite this mealybug problems and green there, are native A,merica, are very 176. will of cassava mealybug and green attention. spider in Africa, one $f?icE: require urgent and appropriate the nee3 for with 177. the crops. The Panel agronomist notes link more agronomic research work in TRIP and recommends systems involving that root closely FSP in on cropping a (vii) Conclusions The Panel is and Recommendations imnressed in bf and highly commends the is and perhaps and the accomplishments, nearing in significant sweet potato. cioseiy scientific scientific Plans together shown by TRIP. cessava conceived The programme and yams, and executed, 178, competence breakthroughs, for to the attain and teamwork especially programme agreed The Panel are well teem works upon objectives. is in is particularly regard deeply spider for to yield concerned mite work in in pests. that these that impressed potential by the to with the progress made in resistance. of the and to cassava that study core t:;e control cnssh-va i,nprove- 179. ment, 180. especially The Penel and green and disease appearance and Bast expand it Africa the end spread grogremme that mealybug positions biology measures found 181. Central Zaire FUZZ recommends biologic:2 be provided and control be sought, quickly to deel of these with Further, recommends funding and suggests supplementary problems. and staff su_npor-t he important relationships by their in this Tne Panel the sug~ ests proposal cand responsibilities respective respect Boards and suggests that for it cassava could research The Panel serve between CIAT and IITA be clarified of IITA of Trustees. has examined - 50 - as a basis with its disease ca:-sava for special discussion. tasks pests In the meantime, of improving cassava have appeared, the Panel production recommends in Africa, African that :here IITA continue in serious and insect technology and of. training agriculturists and research. 182. advance there this 'The Panel which is nol;! real commends the the potential continue considers major several (D. for studies genetic of flowering imprwement adequate and seed set of white in ;:'ms, a major tilat overcomes problem of seed production. facilities in too To that breeding The Fanel recognizes yams and recommencis t?.at work should !'ibe Panel its for the next to be given that,by efforts years rotlmdata), and support. m::ny root end, the crops, Panel IITY col:X 183. diilyte that over-expansion in efforts cassava. and tLat important species ievel recommencis on t?e in yam improvementbe concentrated .most important at i-L53 present b:ork on coca; ‘rns be kept or even discontinued. imprwement to level. the importance for biological of this there under factors is of the rese,arch to major studies insect. need for The Panel in the a better specifiei recommen4s productivity de?inition conditions cooperation of root of the of soil with end tuber beheviour fertility, FSP iu efforts cassava of the pests P,SOfTAUi,I to work in slieet on breeding potato, for and recommends Afric-In conditions, thet and 184. this The Panel programme commends the should continue present concentrate be supported at its 185. staff The Panel in Zaire, made, recognizes where selections resistance and disease are being and where basic of the considers improved importance that material of these of the mealybug have contributed anunderstanding 186. shade defining crops. The Panel of the various the different and inter-specific importence competition. -51 a CHLPTER V. GRAIN LJXXJME INPROVEMEHT PROGRAMNE GLIP) gr,ain of food scientists soybean legume legumes are work improvement in the concerned programme are is aimed at improving t?ie lima in s:l~& I (i> Introduction humid and subhumid oowpea (Vigna tropics, The principal cajun). legumes The Institute's 187. quantity eni quality crops with which there winged the is been (Phaseolus addition, le eand assessed of integrated yield for maize and resistant The intercropping the21 do the germplasm broad has shown that ca-use less iines -~riale with suitable some narrow reduction at Ibadan of cowpea are more efficie:it arc being and millet If1 a !qo‘ r:3 t;, 3s' :c:; intercropping, and breeding and with and in Tanzania, drier savenneh. 200. sites on the Cowpea. Disease Asia and South of major evalu4ion the America. of breeding GLIP programme by scientists undertaking training course in higher all pethogens, beer es-t;oli::hed jmy' -*0 p1 __ ?"rie International Nursery trials hove ;+jJ :?O c3 i; i < ~ ,xv: in Africa, distribution These trials on sources material. is at three degree aspects proviie useful its of resistance, stability aEd e comprehensive 201. through ments for technical ylithin !Zraining levels: progremmrs; -- a.ii 'fii-,? ar~mrigem longer a for;lal t;!rci 9-IC e-qt s snort-term production visit:; of national rr:~:;ngevek post-graduates studies;end of grain lagume impro?Temerik. (iv) 202. certain that it Soybean Soybean countries will also (Glycine of max) is subtropical at present one of the zones. in the principal Recent tropical legume research parts crops of the i.n and temperate important suggests become increasingly - 54 - world where it has a significant for potentiel the farmer. role In in humal food addition, and nutrition end es a source of cash income soybean may have higher then cowpea in the humid end subhumid tropics. However, fln?ther L-ield potential research is needed to achieve higher yields and adaptation to tropical conditions. Yields of over 3,000 kg/ha have been recorded in tropical variation, factors investigations of the agronomically soybean research at IITA is many on an experimental improved basis. cultiv-,rs vrsie.tics ;: w-r; emerzen::e ;.ow:.an.ds from sce,J ope~:6izg Line-: better from in the 203 e adapted nexrow constitute The main objective to the range lowland to develop enviroanments characters, to increased indicate seed in the inferior, of Africa. of Although and poor a number existing seedling from iTSA possess major time tha Preliminary cultiv;trs, the aid good agronomic limiting them are derived of soybean for these. of genetic Preliminary of ripening though U.S. Poor seed viability production that field of Africa. from the of factors account SoutheCast Asia, viaiblity have shown distinctly types, data all from IITA experiments Asian have recentlii nod:.Gate shorhm thiS:l in Tanzania on i?c nodulztion I,--- 204. adapted G.th0u-t into !.OCi! of Southeast viabili'1) origin, and Ti~;w:i.: i~f7,)":1DT'j.t5.0.1 of an inoculant. non-shattering, programme of tile activities collection, The programs- 0 >Jill disease concentrztc of improved high seed end seedling yieldi%, cand of desirable ckrz.cteristic:: cultiv;:r:;. continuity for fellows i!: ::Ic: and lodginpresistsnt by a lack four for breeding from of stn.ff corr? position 205. breeding Since The soybepa the inception the has beer? hampered there progremme of this in 1972, progrJe to st,p~?' modest, are at present on germplasm A total of 802 lines have been assembled evaluated lines and the Amer?co.:;; Sources into lines of t?le k;ree?from ot'wr most of them still resistance ing with areas lines, strains There have to be adequately pustule also is evidence their t%t and described. and incorporated Southeast soils remains Asia thzn African to bacterial of Rhizobium although have been identified from may be more compatible indigenour Q to tropical symbiotic efficiency of origin, to be accurately determined. 207. Hybridization pustule, between soybean lines originally selected for yield, resistance the accessions to bacterial seed shattering and lodging have been made within - 55 - of American lines series From the are being screened origin. More recently, Southeast Asia.. have been tested crosses at sites the lines have been made between and advanced Ivory in the are lines Coast early in Nigeria, derived U.S. lines and first and from tropical of crosses second for their screened Preliminary from the and Ghana. generations be group for of crosses, improved seed viability. with areas These progenies indigenous of pathology, but the Rhizobium. wGUld also ability to nodulate the 208, confined Work has been cnndu8tedin soil to yield Lima bean Lima bean (Phaseolus It accepted for areas of the has high in of high yield rainfall, microbiology trials. entomology, agronomic nematology, physiology, and utilization, work has been (VI 709. readily crop support 210. lunatus) potential, is locally important Also with in the from it rsin-forest pests rePiol:s an-i is ieWe the of p,frica. comparative COmmGdity. at IITA freedom some places as a food Research is a potential with has been conducted the University government objective sole of Belgium of the crop in collaboration lima of &mhloux. cultlvars with The overall yields for humid bean work has been to develop and to improve methods stable and mixed situations, of growing them in the 211. and semihumid is tropics, young one. About disease leave 800 accessions reactions. soon, two years lines are and adaptability. crosses is as ago. inclnried. in have now The work is The programme for several a comparatively from characters been assembled, evaluated being ?12. principally West Africa. Expert The collection and for who will has been partia!.ly agronomic carried Lima out by an FAO Associate bean intrawere selected to increase and inter-species for genetic disease crosses resistance, disease intrawith its were initiated and superior resistance Forty lines a programme variation, from the efficiently 213. The material project now available can handle and inter-specific one-man staff. much as the (vi.) 214. pea The Panel was informed involvement of IITA with Pigeon that this pigeon crop 'pea breeding will be limited has been discontinued. to the continuation The of yield future - 56 - evaluation mandate 215. uniform and four for local for of breeding the the materials developed crop. of pigeon and evaluated out short at other duration, at ICRISAT, the institute that has the improvement of this Before trials lines discontinuation was assembled pea breeding in observation locations. photoperiod at IITA, an extensive at Ibadan, of plant 'soy germand types plasm collection has been identified varieties. nurseries A wide range insensitive had been carried including have been described types', as a basis and distributed to national programmes (vii) 216. African Miscellaneous The only leOme Legumes included in this category by GLIP is the in FSP on the bean is This germplasm could winged closely bean related and maintained collection assess critical for the in still uncertain. by the the Work is conducted The work on winged Future from of its its plans Papua New Guinea. evaluate diseases winged legume (Psophocarpus at a very acquisition mechanisms distribution management humid Africa. tetragonolobus). P. palustris. level, exploratory modest are to expand the of new material of IBPGR. factors. and importance be done by using The aim is to Winged bean is however, bean in Afrioa, and identify have a future crop is might and pests, a legume that acceptance zones of Africa; as a food (viii! 217. the Conclusions The Panel and Recommendations highly commends the quality The Panel has been very It is evident fed approach. impGrtance economic with of agronomic are being this the the finds that that into effective the the and the the and that findings plant scientific a major of the competence production pathology, programme and in breakthrouph entomology sri the achievements of CLIP. soon. groups supports interdisciplinary team approach cowpea programme may be expected and physiology Panel 218. strongly The Panel improvement stresses systems, of continued aspects the research in cowpea agronomy cowpea into investigations Programme. second priority in CLIP and intercropping production, intercropping 219. and the of sole Farming and intercropped Systems extension and physiological systems in cooperation that The Panel recommends soybean improvement be the - 57 - and that tion for limits 220, time should work on soybean germplasm institutions, problems to the that great collection lines encountered agrees with should with the the be broadened. most desirable tropical of the of tropical With the coopera- of IBTSOY and other rapid its progress work in the be identified. genes necessary environments which Afrisa. with soil and in the efficiency the sane a full- in lowland mandate The Panel Institute on soybean recommends l/With subhumid the existing and humid parts vacancy from The Panel soybean in CLIP be filled entomology, seed quality increase breeder. adequate strides inputs pathology, microbiology in pest and agronomy, can be made in feels that close soybean encourages FSP group. and storage activities the along and disease management. also The Panel with the the the many of the cooperation oowpea work oan be coordinated of research. lines 221. level The Panel in legume The Panel g/so that and this with that microbiology recommends efforts the latter programme to strongly with that lima bean project in other in the be kept higher support centre on this to crop at its a lima present arpas. of lima It low osn be concentrated University institution, to reinforce transfer decision this located the priority of origin is understood in CIAT, perhaps South 222. in other 223. bean. 224. training work of Gembloux gives research bean project bean, and can be encouraged America, in Central technology the that possibilities taken will by IITA to Africa. to discontinue breeding work The Panel pea, priority The Panel It supports is areas felt on pigeon allow concentration of effort and support of CLIP. that only exploratory work be undertaken with winged recommends In conclusion, efforts on lima bean, in the pigeon Panel reiterates its legumes recommendation be kept that research and end that GLIP be concentrated pea and other primarily on cowpea and soybean, at a low, minimum level. I-/ Should the cooperation between IITA and INTSOY enable either the outposting of or provide funds for the opening of a new position in IITA, an INTSOY scientist the Panel would recommend that this position reinforce the agron0mi.c aspect of soybean work. LZ/ When recommending a programme generally considered that the doctoral fellow or a visiting other staff members. on a given crop be kept at a low level, the Panel staffing should not go beyond that of a post scientist with some part-time collaboration from - 58 - CEIBprn VI* (CIP) clERFlAL IMPRBVWEZJT PRociFombE (i> 225, Introduction The Cereal Improvement Programme is directed largely to needs of the 32 countries in tropical Africa, and deals with mai5e and rice in oooperation with other i&e* national farmers, institutes. and yields Id5e snd rice production is predominantly by subsistence 8pe very low. and over hslf and other plants, 226. Mdze is lergely intercropped with legumes, cassava of the rice is grown under upland conditions. Maize (Zea meys), the major oereel crop in tropical Africa, is grown on 7.7 million hectares (of which about 3 millionare in West Africa), with an annual production annually, 227, of 9 million aunuslly, tons. The region is a net importer, increase. with about half a million tons imported Production equal to that inoreases over the past deoade averaged 2.G essentl,ally of population Rioe (CWza sativa and 2. glaberrima) is grown on 3.6 million ha in tropioal Africa (of which about 2 million are in West Africa), with an annua;l production of 4.7 million tons. Average yield in tropioal Africa is 1300 kg/ha, but this figure is reduoed to 850 kg/ha by the exolusion of lalagesy, which is the largest rioe producer tons). Imports of rice Production increases tonB annually. (1.8 million in tropical Africa are approaching a million over the past decade heve aversged Z.L$ annually. (ii) 228. Objectives The broad mandate of the progrsmme is to oonduot "studies and research in the humid snd subhumid regions of Africa for the improvement of crops such as rice end maisle for which other international institutes and organizations have special responsibility, cooperating in whatever weys mey be appropriate with those institutes and organizations". Cereal reaesrch at IITA has been oonfined to rioe and maize. 229. Maize and rice reeearch in tropical of local Afrioa is being conducted in many countries from IRPI, CIMMYT, IRAT to integrate its research under the direction and WARDAae well ss IITA. and training, and to implement cooperative mental programmes. 230. governments snd with sssistanoe IITA is making continuing efforts activities with these agencies and govern- Sinoe 1976, the Cereel Progremme bee redirected its objectives around the concept of eoosystem balanoe aohieved through the integration of breeding for wide with pestand crop- management approsohes for specific problem aress* adaptability - 59Ekphasiea in improvemerrt is pBaoed cm bra y-based var3eta.l of materials resistanoe to pests and stressea in the tropicsBe ansPve e-ah&ion where such stresses occur nat~~~~ in Africa. 239. is envisaged under conditions Maize research has the major objective of varietal development for the subhumid tropics, with stable inseot and disease tolerance, especially to the unique African streak for virus and borer probl m for hybrid mai5e, Expanded objectives maize for objective also include work on green maize maize, level* the humid tropics, acid eofILs, early-maturing maize, mid-altitude drought-tolerant 232. areas of more advanced technology of identifying or developing to blast toxicity. Rice research with other has the primary adapted Larger varieties, stem borers, panicles objectives 233. a focus on upland rice pests8 and major soil kernel with high tolersnce deficiencies and other diseases, suoh as iron and heavier weight to facilitate hand harvest are also among the of the pxwgx-amma. is ooncentrated in cooperative prograPrrmes in Sierra Leone, tminbg aotivities and cooperative yield tridls of maize tropical Africa, Technology transfer Liberia and Nigeria, while end rice extend throughout (iii) a44. Organisation The Cereal Programme was initiated a rice present oomplement of seven senior in 1970 with the appointment yeare professional staff of a msize breeder wae added the following The teem grew gradually and three post-doctoral breedeqend to its positionsa ted in each categoxy for 1978. The An additional position is senior staff at IITA includes a plant pathologist as Programme Leader (Assistant onomiat-breeders, en entomologist and a physiologist Director level), plus two assigned to the maize progremme; and a breeder and en agronomist in the rice progrsmme. aurrently A plant pathologist is budgeted for the Progr e in 1978. Post-doctoral8 essist 235. in rice thology and physiology, and in entomology. Cooperative include a breeder, major constraints 236, programme staff oonoerned with r&e in Sierra Leone and Liberia an agromsmist and a plent pathologist, working generally under imposed ted ~o~te~~ staff support or funds. and strengthen The intelrthe wince 1976 the cope pr e hse, moved to redistribute of an ecosyst approache -6o- disciplinary believes cropping that activity is most evident in entomology and pathology. soil Future plans are to expand efforts practices in tirology, cells mop management end crop physiology. to ecosystems involving integration with fling the proposed expansion for greater The Panel problems and systems research. with field and The core staff 237. screenhouse facilities for seed handling ment. is of good scientific which are in general and for calibre quality and provided satisfactory, evaluation but support facilities are in need of imprcve- and processing (iv) (4 238, Scope and Achievements Breeding of the Raise Progrennne The first five yearz of maize breeding work at IITA led to the development of several high-yielding composites based on African and introduced germplasm. The Nigerian variety TZB (formerly Nigerian Ccmp. B) has consistently performed well in West Africa; it has been released by national progremmes and is gaining acceptance by Nigerian growerse Newer varieties include versions of low-eared CIM?4YT compoeites,TZPB (white seed) and TZY (yellow), end a high-lysine version of TZB. An extensive programme of varietal fntroduction znd hybridization is under way. Rreeding objectives currently focus on disease and pest resistance (see 239. below), earlinees, improved ear position, and high grainrstcver ratio. A widespacing eelection cropping approach patterned after local farming practices is being evaluated for Additional breeding studies for selected of superior parental material8, systems include acid soil and drought tolerance, and hybrid maize. The Q the nmny ecoaysteme in which maize progremmels approaches are somewhat diffused is grcwn in Africa. Plant Pathology and Entomology 04 240. Despite the limitations on pathology staff, the most important constraints to varietal improvement in maize have been determined (mainly by surveys in West African countries). Particular screening, progrese especially has been made in improving for mai5e streak virus. methods for disease-resistance - 61 - 241. Identification and assessment of the severity of m&se pathogens has been extensive, resistsnoe stripe particulsrly of the stalk and eer rot complex, and screening for has been initiated (additional work on this important problem is needzones), Wallaby sp;), Other diseases identified inolude a bacterial ear" in plants heavily infected with planthoppers, The presence of dowq mildew and sugarcane ed in more humid ecolcgical (Pseudomonas and at least mosaic virus 242. two unidentified in Af'ricahas viruses. also been confirmed. The two major insect problems limiting the yield and productivity of maize streak virus, are taokled in tropical Africa, stemborers and 1eafhopperc;transmitted by a strategy of interdisciplinary genetic improvement through breeding for pest and disease resistanoe. screening virus procedure for by subjecting The programme has developed a comprehensive and imaginative the accurate identification maize materials of resistance to maize streak pressure of to the selective improved Africsn mass-reared mixed populations in screenhouses. 243. of viruliferous Cicadulina mbila and 2. trianggla These studies have resulted in the production of streak-resistant full-sib to breeders families in an adapted white breeding stock (TZSR) which has been offered in the region. 244. Satisfactory progress is also being made in the development and application of screening methods for resistance to the two most important African maize stemborers (Busseola fusca and Seszmia spp.), and in the identification of ear insect problems 245. The work on stels-borer resistance has only just begun and prcmiae is shown by the identification of some resistance to Sesamia and the progress in the development of mess rearing techniques and infestation methodology for Busseolao This work could benefit by close collaboration with CIMKYT in the screening of materials already identified for corn-borer resistance in other continents and in the development and refinement of screening techniques. Such resistance should be transferred to major African maize varieties. 246. An effioient method of borer control was developed using granular Furadan insecticide. - 62 - The Panel commends the programme for the progress made, especially in the 247. area of the identification of apparently stable resistance to the streek virus and the screening be provided for stem-borer resistance,and recommends that additional facilities to accelerate the attainment of the objectives of this progrenune. (c) 248. Agronomy and Phy81010~ Reduced maize yields and reduced grain in low latitudes number per plant. have been related Night respiration consistently to low light was quantified and averaged 5% of plant dry weight,and is thus apparently a minor contributor to reduced yields at low latitudesc Studies are also under wag on the photoperiod sensitivity and acid soil tolerance of maize* An important result inmaize physiology ha8 been the demonstration that potential sink size per hectare is genetically limited even though environment also ha8 effects. (4 (4 Scope and Achievements of the Rice Programme Breeding; Semi-dwarf cultivars from Asia generally perform well in African irrigated 249. paddies, but often fail due to diseese or soil conditions in valley swamps and under upland rice conditionso Rice improvement at IITA has fooussed on the problem of iron rice toxicity in Liberia 250. toxicity in valley swamps and on disease and drought problems of upland An apparently A&an lines, heritable high tolerance to iron end one of these was released in the rain forest was identified zone8. in several to growers es YSuakoko 8”. Despite extensive screening, however, no upland rice introductions have been found to be superior to selected Af?rioan lines, such as LAC 23 and OS 6. However, for the rain forest areas some genetio materials with superior levels of resistance to blast and panicle diaeazes have been identified and developed largely from hybrids between introduced and lccdb germplasm. 04 251. Plant Pathology of a second patholcgist in 1978 will allow expansion in this Appointment are& -63 252. The pale yellow mottle virme of rice, previously unrecognized, was described, and its transmissibility demonstrated snd screening methods developed. Intensive screening has been undertaken to identify sources of resistance to this virus to blast 253. disease,with some successB streak distinct disease has been identified on rice in Africa, virus diseases have been recognieed. Seed-borne bacterial and three other apparently (4 254. Entomolog Two major inseot problems in African rioe eoosystems are the rice borers (+Chilo and Marliapha) and the stalk-eyed fly (Diopais spp.); other problems seem Work has been initiated on the intensive screening minor and restricted in range. of the germplasm for been identified. 255 resistance to these speciee,and some tolerant lines have Good progress has been made in developing technique8 for this mass-rearing of Diopsis,and the Panel recommends that future efforts should concentrate on an l early identification of materials resistant technique8 that minimize pest losses while resistance to major diseases. to these pests and on crop management retaining existing levels of pclygenic (d) 256. Agronorqy and Physiology Studies of the tolerance of irrigated rice to nutrient deficiencies varietal responses, encouraging the view (N, P, K, S, Zn) revealed differential that wider screening be practiced in Africa. Several methods were devised to smeliorate 257. iron toxicity, with including burning of straw and alag applications. production were defined stability problems assessed fn cooperation Africa, PSP, four major systems of rice into a novel traneeot in all evaluation for and were incorporated varietal yields was or toposequence approach Relative Statistical to enable simultaneous of varietal inherent before these systems. shown to differ function of this technique across the transect. designs have still in rice in such continuous wide application to be adequately improvement is possible. (vi) 258. International Programme Relationships resource for maize and rice improvement in tropical IITA is a major regional Africa. African These two crops command high priority in the production programmes of most countriess The strengthening of IITA*s ability to contribute to the growth, and stability of production that of these crops is the major objective are being developed. importanoe: linkage with other IARCs with of programme relationship8 are of pricrity profitability international 259. Two such linkages responsibilities for these crepe, and linkages with through cooperative research and training, including 260. that The Panel noted that the first set of linkages cooperating countries and programmes those coordinated by WARDA. is being developed but wished in order to enrich the these should develop more speedily and more effectively resource base of IITA 80 as to enhance its potential contributions to the solution of African problems in maize and rice production, In particular, greater exchange of materials and cooperation and interchange in the development of strategies should be encouraged with CIWMYTfor maize, and IRRI and WARDAfor rice, although it is recognized 261. that IRRI has only recently relationships expanded its programme on upland rice. between IITA and FdARDA, Good working have been established cooperation in training for many yearg and more recently WARDA has tith good taken on direct responaibilfty for production training by developing a training institution in Liberia where courses are held. IITA still prwides some staff for these training cour8ea and conducts research training courses at the IITA The two institution exchange and share planting material and IITA is site. represented on the WARDAscientific programme committee. IITA staff have re,tiarly participated with WARRAin monitoring tours and in discussion of annual work plans on rice in the region. 262. The Panel noted a healthy development of IITA-involved cooperative programmes These cooperative programmes cwer a wide range of in many countries in Africa. activities including cooperative variety trials, selection of types, breeding and training. improvement, cooperation in on-farm research and production and technical 263. The level of cooperation with local scientists and technicians is generally good as evidenced by cooperative work in the NAFTP programme for rice and maize in Nigeria, savannab maize reesearch in Upper Volta, rice work in Liberia and T liaison in the Tanzania maize programme* Sierra Leone and the PITA/X - 65 - (vii) Future Plalls Expension of cooperative programmes ie envisaged to include maize and also 264. rice improvement in Cameroun (with the Cameroun government). Cooperation with d in Upper Volta, with possible expansion to Mali and Zambia, and increased SAW liaison with the CIMWT'programme in Zaire, are alao contemplated. It is planned to continue and expand efforts to provide adapted maize germplasm 265. with high resistance to maize streak and borers, and with earliness and low ear position, as well 266. a.s rice In future, cultivars greater with superior blast and drought tolerance. on drought tolerance of rice and emphasis will be laid maize by developing oooperative links with appropriate institutions. The Panel considers that these developments are consistent with needs and opportunities present in staff in Africa call snd worthy of support within It a few key 0cientiEte the constrdnte that to different staff. of budget and increase and assigning region8 programme balance at IOTA. for outpoeting the task of regional notes with approval plans for future liaison-linkage to the headquarters - (viii) Assessment of Constraints is need for and Isauee disease-resistant varieties of addition81 atudiee to develop methods for To facilitate 267. rice and maize there resistance the development of stable screening to several important diseases on which information presently Some examplee are (1) panicle diseases (rots) of rice (estimated ie inadequate. 2046 loss on improved rice varieties during rainy periods), (2) Rhynchosporium leaf scald of rice, (3) nematodes that very likely will be a limiting factor if shifting agriculture is to be convert&to intensive farming. It is difficult or impossible, priorities for work until reliable data on losse8 have been efforts are planned to obtain experimentally derived data however, to establish Increased generated. on disease losses. (ix) Conalusions and Recommendations Borne academic argument among plant and polygenic resistance to pests, reeistanoe varietiee. has.frequently resulted Thus the Panelcommendsthe breeders concernhistory has shown emphasis Although there ie still 268. ing the merits of single-gene that the use of single-gene of resistant effectivenees 1/ Sub-Arid in short-lived Food Grain Research and Development. - 66 - which is being placed in CPP. on the use of broad-based resistance to pests and diseases The eoosystem-adapted approach to crop improvement requires extensive 269. careful evaluation and selection of materiel8 in the appropriate environment. the number of such ecosystems for Afxioan maize and rice is extremely large, end Since the Panel would urge continuing assessment and priority-setting, in cooperation with specialists from the Faxming Systems Programme and other institutes, of ecosystems to which IITA efforts directed, The Panel notes favourably the progress 27Q. straints to African rice end maize production, solution rice. 271. in cereal improvement are likely to be best and most effectively of the programme in identifying and especially virus the conin the in progress of the problems of borers and streak in maize and iron-toxicity The Panel encourms work with continuation or expansion of selected cooperative upland rice for and/or contractual fooussed in-country maize end rice improvement programmes, ecg. those on maize downy mildew resistslaoe end on blast-tolerant wide adaptation in Africa. Recognizing the increasing demaud for cooperative programmes, the Panel favours these projects which not only advance research and development in the cooperating @our&y, but also sontribute to high-priority scientific objeotives of the core programee 272. The Panel endorses evaluation of experimental methods for achieving high and and stable yields under stresses of special relevance to the African cereal encourages inputs to this programme by farming systems speofaUstaY grower, The Panel notes that the Memorendum of Understanding agreed between TITA, IRRI 273. and WARDAin May 1976 makes provision for annual meetings of a '"ooordinating committee comprising the Directors General of II‘ PA and IRRI snd the Rzecutive Secretary of HARDA or their representatives to consider annual work plans and review progress of work in order that under this in West Africa to ensure coordination by loeating a senior on a continuing scientist basisrf. It further notes agreement WXRI should participate 8ctively in the rice programme as its representative in the z-e&on . . . to maintain liafssn with material and other exch encourages efforts to 1 PITA t&t MARDAand amellerate exohange of genetic The Panel en IlIE! and West Africa". joint progrsmme planning and review - 67 - and to increase the flow snd exchange of appropriate those derived from African-adapted be strengthened varietal It and segregating believes the staff that materiala, in particular cooperative staff at IITA while germplasm. in strengthening tolerance this approach could actually focussingon rice by the posting of an IRRI senior competence member to IITA. This would also assist disease and stress for upland conditions. for maize improvement by African borers and The Panel encourages CIP in strengthening its efforts 274. schemes focussed on the early solution of problems presented viruses, forest aotivities adaptability to sequential or short-season cropping patterns and to reinof these areas. It strongly supports. all efforts at continued integration with similar CIMMYTprogremmes of high priority to the African farmer. The Panel endorses the conduot of regional maize trials in Afrioa, with appr+ 2750 germplasm dispersal priate national and international inputs, as a means of accelerating end production training experience, and it encourages an expanded role for IITA in the training of African maize researoh and production specialists. a Ihe Panel commends CIPon. its conduot of the symposium on "Rice in Africa" 276. The Panel recommends which had involved IERI, WARDA, IRAT and national agenoies. that the proposed symposium on maize in Afrioa, by the involvement of CIMMYT, IRAT lead to the development of a COOrdin8ted African maize the Panel urges CIMlrlyT end IITA improvement and testing programme. In particular, to establish either 8 Memorandum of Understanding for their oooperation in Africa simi;ilar Lo that sf P;U, IEZI and WARSA referred to in par8 273 above, or any other appropriate arrangement aiming at Close and effective cooperation on their activities in Africa. and national sgencies, ant Genetic Resources (XIEJGR) provided conssrva%ion at IOTA. a amme of African food legume germplasm .S%nce 1976 the work has -be&~ eon.t$,nued &thin IITA's core budge% steff members with the ($223,OW in 1977) aad is aotwd.ly done by three prinoipal help of two graduate ~s~st~t~* 278, genetic different materials The Cenetio reeources IARCs. Re5oume5 Coneervation in which s oonservation, and tuber Prog..amme ia cifis: part of a world network are aseigned to of IITA is "for of genetic of sotivitiee collection, responsibilities In collabor&ion with 'IBPCB, the responsibility documentation crops and rice the exploration, regions of Africa and aoholars'Pe and evaluation for of food legumes, root in the humid and subhumid use by plant breeders imn order ts make these materials avail.able 279 e The germplasm collection has responsibility for IITAas with additional equipment) of a seed health 280. Zsing core budgets testing unit is establiehed as a research support service. It storage and distribution requirements, seed productiona, of 842,COC in lY?6 Plans for (including (1978) $29,000 for include development the future also and 816,000 in 1977. frzcility and the appointment of a seed technologist. of about $5O,OCC facility with fn addition, an TEPGRgrant of $25# in 3977, and an allocation from the TITA budget, the unit will coon have a long-term seed store a aapacity of about 25,OCC S/2 kg seed samples of base collections, medium-term and short-krm seed stores ale available fumigation chamber and appropriate drying faoilitiss. (aI 28'1. Achievements The unit holds as well as an automated at present about 13,COC entries of food legumes including more than 6,COC cowpea about ?$500 ~+tooks of rice (I*oldPB African 0. sativa and OS glaberrima) and 2,&B stsckn of root and tuber crops (mainly cassava) which are maintained in a living collection. 282, The udt ~~~~o~ed to rape&s from 54 oountries for food legume germplasm Close link have been ~~tab:~~~~~a with rePmgint institutions actively in 1976, ) WARDAl IRRXp the Genetic engaged in Seed Storage Latiratory, Fort Collins, - 69 - 283. In spite of recruitment difficulties, the unit has started exploration and oolleotion reinforcing in some West Afrioan countries end was successful in establishing mutually oollaborative efforts with the respective Rational Genetic Resources Leone and Liberia. resouroes by offering in part work has been provided two post-doctoral by IRPGR grants. by recruitment (only of &SC. one of Programmea in Ghana, Sierra 2% Training in genetio students University activities participating in special so far> courses offered by the Department fellowships of Botany, of Birmingham, which could be filled and by training courses in the unit. Treining have been financed (‘ d 285. African Future Trends The unit prepared countries within for 8 tentative 3-5 years timetable for exploration to cover all West and and to extend these aotivities by the IITA mandate. to Esstern Southern Africa crops specified Descriptors for genetic resources of main orop species at the Institute will be developed by the IITA unit in cooperation with other IARCs (e.g. CIAT, ICRISAT, IRRI) to meet the needs of an international network for documentation and exchange of germplasm. Rfforts will be made to utilize the VXIR" system sponsored by IBPCR for data management end publication of extensive germplasm catalogues planned for the next three years. An aspect of future work will be the evaluation of quantitative, agronomically 287. using whenever possible the smallest important characters in two or more environments, sample of accessions of eaoh species collection which multivariate analysis has shown to be representative of diversity on the whole. 288. Provision will have to be made to safeguard germplasm by holding duplicates at Port Collins for 289. Future research at the IITA geqlasm species Cryza species unit base oolleotions of stored seed cowpea and at IRRI for rice. contribute to the biosystematics special reference 286. will of 'Iligna (including to Cryza glaberrima 290. the wild and other of the genus) and Cryza with in Africa. for IITA will host an AAASA (Association workshop on plant genetic the Advancement of Agricultural resources in Africa in January 1978. Sciences in Africa) - 71 - 299. Ihe Panel -9s with the fITA deoision that this germplasm unit should not of itself oonduct any research actitities root and tuber crops, meristem culture, of 1ongLterm seed storage results in these fields conditions. and contract for in the fields of reproductive physiology root and tuber storage and determination It may$ however, make use of relevsnt additional research required. research (ii) 300. Virology diseases Unit plots of IITA to be convinced One only needs to observe the experimental of most, if not all, Africa. that virus in crops are major constraints to plant production tropiosl For example, cassava and main;e production oan be drastically reduced by cassava mosaic and m&se streak. However, because of the success of breeding for plant resist&we at IITA, both of these diseases csn non be controlled. At the same time, there are many virus diseases of other crops that or potentially can become, limiting factor8 to increased production. viruses have not been identified and oharacterized, nor have their presently are, E4any of these various modes of transmission and host ranges been determined. This type of information on each virus is required for development of resistance screening or other possible control strategies. In 1977,a Virology one virologist. A senior 301. Unit was established at IITA, and is ourrently staffed by position for a second virologist is included in the 19'78 scientist is expected to spend six months at IITA In addition, budget. in the near future. a visiting Pending a final decision oonoerning the future of this Wit, some equipment 302. and supplies (total about $50,000) have been purchased; space for a virology laboratory- has not yet been designated but cgn easily be found. Purpose of the Unit (4 The unit is not intended for basic research, but will be expeoted to do 303. problem-oriented research closely related to the work of IITA that will assist all three crop improvement progrsmmes and the germplasm unit. Some examples of the types of services (i) (ii) and cooperative involvement expeoted of the unit are as follows: production of entisera useful for virus identification; determination of virus identity by serologioal, electron microscopic methods, eto., and determination of characteristics suoh as mode of trsnsmission soreening to faoili-tate development of resistanoe methodology; n% of sensitive lasm, espeoially tests meristem for detection of viruses in and %issue culture inter-country (developing movement infeotions rn~thod~~~~ in TRIP), to facilitate of provem clean-germplasm; testing of incoming snd outgoing of viruses seed stooks germplasm for virus into countries %o Prevent introduotion where they do in insect- no% now oc5ur; produ&ion of virus-free proof screenhouses of by increase design; and of satisfaotory the status especially determination diseases and viroids, of some of the virus-like sgents such 88 wooplasma in Africa, etoc Wintenanoe of Unit Equipment b) The Panel had confirmation of the ability of the Institute to maintain the 3% sophisticated e&pment required by the unit in view of the availability of a highly provision well as for qualified electronic engineer at%IITA. It was also informed and related that there is as in the 1978 budget for inseot-proof an electron q iorosoope equipment screen housesa The Panel supports the eetablishment of the unit for the purposes indicated 305. and the plan outlined above,and oonsiders it adequate to meet the present and projected The only staff increase which should be considered in the needs of the Insti%ute. neaz future is for a senior of the unit's equipment. technical support staff position to assist in the operation Service Laboratories, Plan% @rowth P'aoilities IITA's service snd research laboratories, by virtue of the capacity built 3%. into them originally, oontinue to provide adequa%e amounts of laboratory spaoe and are generously supplied with equipment and facilities for routine research procedures. Thus, it space (iii) is unlikely %ha%IITA will need additional buildings for laboratory use for some years, unless major programme changes, is slowly the wisdom of the original at present building unforeseen, OCCUPY Overflow under the buildings,whioh being converted plans. from parking to other uses,illus%rates some sewiee laboratories function well snd have adequate supenrision, Alth 307. leave aome%hing to be desired, !&is othera, cf which plan% pathology Pa an ex - 74- appsrently funotioning 30% arises because there is no clearly designated responsibility for the of the laboratory~whioh serves a variety of crop improvement progrsmmeso recommends that function this situation be re-examined, by assigning laboratory with a view The Panel strongly the service to improving for the respeotive 309. of these laboratories responsibility areas to the maintenanoe and supervision of progrrunme-controlled programes. a similar problem exists is taking to be dried with the present and threshed seed-drying must pass for breeding Ihe Panel notee that area, and that and threshing It all the Institute materials is steps to remedy the situation. is the area through which sll programmes (except are kept. TRIP); it also the area in which the dey-to-dq materisls 310. The Panel strongly su~~orfs the provision in the 1978 capital new threshing floor and urms management to examine the possibilities areas for 311. budget for a of providing specific programmes in the expsnded faoilities. The Panel is fwourably impressed by the plant growth chambers and 'by the extensive controlled environment facilities which are maintained in first class working conditions. 312. The Panel shares IITA's have limited concern as to the proper functioning because of werheating. In its of the greenhouses. control and 1978 capital IITA has two greenhouses which apparently therefore usefulness do not have adequate temperature budget IITA is Proposing a new fibreglass greenhouse, which, would have evaporative It is presumed that the new greenhouse would have cooling pads and extra&or fans. diviedDns and that different areas would be assigned to the various progrsmmes as recommended above. The Panel supports this proposal for impoved plant growth fsilities and suaPests that IITA should engage a consultant and operation specialieing in tropical greenhouse construction who could advise on proper alterations for the existing greenhouses and on the design of new ones. It would appear to the nonspecialist that the existing greenhouses might be converted to a screenhouse-type of construction from rain. under the original greenhouse roof for experiments that require protection (iv) 313, s%a%istPos The Statistio&t Services Unit prcnrides statistica and oomputing services statistical of other for analysis staff. all research programmers Services inolude design of experiments, of data9 programming and the operation of a computer, and training At present 3% the unit consists of one biometrician and one progremmer. of field experiments arising ‘ There is serious concern over the high variability largely from soil heterogeneity, due to the absence of long-term uniform use and cultivation. lore appropriate choice of plot size experimental site and experimental design may imprwe this somewhat, but the biometriclen is also investigating new statistical techniques. There also appears to be some reason to believe that the procedures for data reoording intercropping oould be made more reliable. and/or oomp:Lex topssequences which include Moreover, the e~eriments pose complicated statistical probleme and require the development of new end imprwed experimental designs. The Panel strongly urges all staff to seek advice on experimental design at an early stage of planning. 315. The work load of the unit extended by demands on his time* appears large, and the biometrioien There is no large baoklog of work says he is fully i.n the unit, but there appears to be no system under which the unit is made aware of all existing field experiments end reaords t&en, so that it can assess its total workload and plan ahead. The work pressure would be eased greatly if additional software packages could be made available, and if the computer could handle them. The biometrician staff would :in any event be needed to aid in the design felt that more statistica of experimentsa, 316. It appears important that computer Facilities be- upgraded at an early stage, and a group has been se% up within the Institute to consider this question, It seems that administrative end accounting requirements had been regarded as preeminent in the selection of the present system9 but with the projected workload it is essential that the r.eplaoement facility obviously keep this be selected in mind. with a view to its scientific use, and the group till (a> 317. Conclusions end Reoommendations The Panel commends the efforts msde towards establishing a full statistical service for soientifio work in the Institute and reoommends that these should be reinforoed by fhe appointment of another statistician/bionnetrician with necessary suppor& - 75 - 318. The Panel supports servioes* the development of improved computer facilities for statistical The Panel strongly supports ourrent plans for formal arrangements under which the statistician will be associated with the design of ell field experiments, and recommends 319. that no experiment should proceed unless the Director design. there of Research has satisfied himself as to the soundness of its 320. The Panel recommends that their should be regular reviews of lowterm eqqeri- ments to determine continuedviability. (4 Quarantine and The fundamental basis of IITA's strategy of crop improvement is access to 91. germplasm with a broad genetic base in the crops of its mandate. The acquisition international and efficient evaluation facilities of such materials is contingent on the existence of rapid for the movement of plant materials. The Panel recognizes the fact that several significant successes in crop improvement have been achieved in a relatively short time, due largely to the availability of wide germplasm bases in the crop improvement programmes. The rate of progress in the future, however, may be severely limited by the difficulties associated with the plant quarantine and although the very cordial relationpost-entry screening facilities at Moor Plantation, ships with,and assistance provided by,the Pederal plant quarantine officialswere noted. 322. At #present9 movement of materials is delayed, it is difficult to get clearance for shipping germplasm as seed, and all vegetative materials are completely prohibited from intelbcountry having quarantine are still 323. movement. personnel Attempts attached to alleviate the problem have been made by but some difficulties to the IITA germplasm unit, encountered. The Panel notes that sane of these are examples of worldwide problems, e.g: (i) mwement of clonal vegetative materials into most countries is prohibited; (ii) the danger of IITA being charged with responsibility for distribution of pests, tests for both in and out of Nigeria, contamination (for because of lack of adequate exsmple, Nigerian quarantine officials, &though allowing shipment of eassava seeds from ITPB, are concerned that bacterial blight may be seed-borne); into CoPcmbia of even true cassava seed is prohibited (iii) the entry - 76 - because of the fear Thus* although IITA, 324. of introducing African cassava mosaic virus from CIAT by (CMV). oassava germplasm has been received has not been possible, the reverse The Panel, recognizing the hazards to the reputation of IITA and other i&e> national centres involved in inter-country mwement of germplasm, and the constraints to worldwide crop improvement because of wantine restrictions, recommends the consideration (i) and adoption by IITA of the following possible measures: acceleration of the development of tissue and meristem cultures with prwen freedom from pathogens, and persuasion of countries to permit ready entry; exploration the possibility with the Inter-African of the establishment Phytosanitary Commission of station of a quarantine (ii) outside the African ecosystem for of germplasm destined for Afrioan (iii) testing and certification and other tropical countries; inasmuch as present quarantine facilities at Moor Plantation function below optimum because of frequent power failure in cooled greenhouses, participation provision Plant of supplementaq Quarantine facilities the at IITA under the supervision of Nigerian and ooordination and with authorities. (iv) provision of sufficient insect-proof screenhouses at IITA for production of disease and pest-free seed for export. - 77 - CHAPTER VIII. CONFEREZ?CE AND TRURING PROGRAMME Objectives (i) 325. The Conference and Training (i) (ii) to assist in the trsnsfer Programme has two principal and objectives: of knowledge generated by the research training in reseerch, skills programme to those who need and can use it; to respond to the expressed need for production, laboratory work, library in which IITA has expertise. and administrative (ii) 326. Organization The principal Director staff level), assigned to the programme consists production or groups. training officer of a Programme Leader end coordinates subjects proare and (one anglophone and one francois conducted in various of the research Training activities of the participant (Assistant the training related phone) and one translator/interpreter. of individuals to crop production, This small team organizes Group training respousibility under the technical training grammes. Individual divided into five categories, the duration of the tra-ining. 327. is exclusively for researche based on the scientific level The percentages (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) of trainees in each category (PDF) have been as follows: iI 56.6 5*2$ 11.4% 10.4% Group courses Post-doctoral fellowships Research Fellows (RF) and Soholars (RS) Researah Training Associates (RTA) Vacation Student Research Soholars (VSRS) 17.@ maximum 26 at any given time, are included in the The post-doctoral fellows, training programme for administrative and budgetary reasons. They assist the principal 328. staff of the four research programmes and are oonsidered as full-time staff members X). in these programmes. There are at present 17 PDF&. The polioy of the Institute conoerning PDFz is dealt with in the seotion on Organization and Management (Chapter 329. The degree-related researoh programme distinguishes between post-graduate registered for M.Sc.courses students registered for Ph,D. courses (RFs) and students (RSs) in African or other universi.ties, a 1/ Cumulative data for the period 1972-1977. - 78 - There are at present 3308 programmess 13 E&D, aud 19 M.Sco students working in the four research Non-demee researoh trajinees are) in general, employees of researnroh or teaching 3310 institutions who seek to improve their knowledge, skills, teohniques and methodologies. The duration of Group Courses is 9-16 weeks, with a maximum of 33 participants 3320 in an individual oourse* The principal staff of the four research progrsmmes prwides the majority of the teaching staff for these courses. Although no precise data are available, principal 3330 the heads of these programmes reported staff members was devoted to teaching. for organizing and workshops were visitors to that 5 - 155 of the time of the A separate unit a total conf’ erences was oreated in late 1975 with responsibility In 1976, thirteen conferences and handling visitors, participation of @lo There were 4,ooO individual held with the Institute. (iii) in training programmes during the period 334. 1972-77 was well over 600 (34 PDF, 74 Ph.D + M.Sc, 111 vacation students and 366 for group training). Group Courses in II977 included oourses on crop production (rice, root crops, grain legumes), soil and water management, Rhizobium isolation and utilization and agricultural economics~ Some courses have been conducted offcampus in Nigeria and Sierra hone0 Major Achievements The total number of participants A f'irst evaluation of the effects of these courses was completed recently. Most of the participants (86%) in the Group Courses csomefrom Africa (32 countries). In the individual training programmes the of African origin44% PDF, 61% RF, 5% RS, 86% RTA percentages of trainees ad 98% VSRS up to October 1977. It is interesting to note that 6.5% of the core budget of IITA for 1977 335. was assigned to training, as compared with 7e1$ of CIAT's core budget. The Institute has more trainees than CIAT, but fewer man-years of training because the duration of the IITA courses is shorter. Participants in Group Courses are prwided 336. speoifically written for individual oourses~ with lecture syllabi and booklets - 79 - 337. staff The follow-up as they trsvel of IF& treinees is carried out on a regular cf their basis by all former trainees. IITA and observe the work and problems The most important and effective follow-up is in connection with the cooperative projects with national progrsmmes where IITA staff play an important role in providing further guidencs to trainees upon returning to their countries. (iv) Future Trends In the near future the training programme will have its own building. Wforts 338. will be made to attract more PDIB and to increase the number of scholars and fellows from African student oontinue countries. The number of universities will lines. be increased. participating in the vaoation resesroh scholarships Group oourses are expected to along established Conclusions and Recommendations (v9 Not all researoh staff members are equally willing and suited to partioipate 339. in the training programme. It should be borne in mind that a good research scientist is not necessarily a good teacher, whilst a good teacher is not necessarily a good The Panel recommends that the Institute oonsider the desirability research worker. of assigning two scientists abilitiee. designating the training who like duties of each of the four research programmes to one or teaching direction by the work and have given proof of outstanding Par the time being, the Institute is taking steps in this a "rotating" ooordinator in each of the programmes, The Panel notes that the number of PDFB attraoted from Afrioen oountrieq is 340. disappointingly low end that the rate of turnover is very high. This is probably due to the fact ocoupy senior that young Africans holding a Ph.D. degree are soon oalled institutes and public degree, upon to in posts in universities, researoh services their home countries. The same applies, to a lesser holding &SC. degrees or ning&ieur*l qualifications. The international 341. whereby an appropriate to young Africans mandate of the Institute fully justifies its present praotioe mix of resesroh trainees from both developing and developed interaction between trainees of The Panel approves of this polioy be made to attraot more Af’ rioen PDFS, more effectively This provides useful countries is maintained. different cultural end scientific background. but strongly recommends that increased efforts RI% and RSs es well as carefully selected RTAs who would contribute -8O- to the hildi.~ presentation and booklets of AfM.crun research gradually capaM.lities. The'Panel applauds all the bilingual of most of the group training be made available and recommends that both in English course syllabi and Frenche The Panel notesthe 342, in the various categories study in the context Inatitutess research bi.litg of supervisory resources; of financial the nominees* criteria used b! the Institute in the selection of trainees as follows: a) relevance of subject area and proposed of IITAPA's mandate; b) priority of the subject matter in the progremmes; c) relationship to national programmes; d) availatraining and f) personnel personal, and required technical facilities; e) availability attributes of end intellectual The Panel considers these oriteria appropriate and reoommends that, in 343. connection with the proposed increased activity in the attraction of trainees, continue technical to be adhered to in order standards, to ensure the maintenance of high scientific they and The Panel commends the outstanding work of this programme but recommends that 344. some positive improvements be made in the recruitment and selection of African PDFs, RFs, RSs, and RTAs by widely circulating information for,aveilable IITA training positions to institutions in the African region. oq and requesting nominations and national Programme Leaders The Panel notes that the peroentage of the core budget spent by the Institute 345. on training is moderate in oomparison with the needs for training in Africa, whiah are probably greater than in the rest in increasing of the tropical world. It believes that IITA course would be justified these funds with a view to imprwing the quality of the course documentation materials,and suggests that and prwiding the trainees this be investigated, with more durable - 81 - CHBPTERIx. (i) 346. Do(xmwmTIONrn IIspoIIMbTION for the outstanding service it uontinues to Dooumentation Centre and Librq in making this infonational soientists information The Panel commends the Librery perform in providing scientific information to IITA scientists, nation and IITA-originated publiaat5ons available to interested in Nigeria and other countries, and in providing soientific to IITA trainees. 347. and technical The Library holdings of original prwide a substantial it coverage of tropical circulates its accessions to those requesting e&culture lists them. widely, and the crops with making photocopies which IITA is concerned; documents avdlable The Library has prepared and published a world bibliography 348. preparing others on oowpea, lima bean and plantains. It publishes Grain Iqume grain published of literature 349. on gems end is the Vropical including It has 13ulletint* on a quarterly literature basis, with reports end abstracts legume information abstraots relevant from CIAT and ICRISAT, to over 1000 subeorikers. to farming systems in Africa. of selected on mealybugs and is making a compilation IITA is making a major oontribution to African scientific librarianship in a number of ways which have included an all-African meeting of agricultural librarians the preparation of a Union List of all agricultural soience a Union List of the journals of the libraries of the holdings in Nigerian libraries, International Centres, and training for librarians at @cultural research stations in Nigeria, the Cemeroun and Sierra Leone. 350. and documentalists, A guide to the F!rench language agricultural and will be oiroulated to libraries and soientists government and others, collection in Afrioa. in IITA is in preparation With the assistance all relevant of the Belgian material IITA has attempted to acquire in Prenoh to complement the English language oollection. Communications and Information The Panel is very favourably impressed with the work of Conrmunications and 351. Information, which provides IITA's editorial, printing, photographic and graphic art setioes, and also is responsible for the translation of printed material. (ii) - a2 - bibliographies, 352+ The seotion publishes all of the doouments that IITA originates: brochures, newsletters, monographs, news bulletins and handboolcs for trainees, etc. It has its own offset presseat photocopying machines, and a photographic per year. and in the countries opinion leaders, of more than 5tOO0 is required. of laboratory, which prooesses about 13,500 photos end 16,000 slides These publioations serve scientists, both within IITA 353. Africa, research end extension workerst deuision makers and and a genersl audience of interested people. A mdling list maintained, categorized according to interests and materials trainees While the quality and promptness of publication of English language documents 354. were the subjeot of favourable commentI the Panel is concerned about IITA*s difficulties in reaching essociated trenslate the same standards soientifio publications in the IFrenoh language. attracting from English into These difficulties are with problems in finding, and keeping staff F!renoh. who can adequately Present delays are in excess of two months, and are likely to get longer. The Panel recommends that IITA oontinue to pursue with vigor its objective 355. of adequate staffing with English-French translators to avoid the present problems with publications in the Prench language. - 83 - CHAPTERX. ORGANIZA’ l’ ION MD MANAGEWNT Administrative and Personnel Services (i> Undar th8 general direction Of its Board Of TruSt88S, th8 Institute management 356. consists of a Director Oenersl, Deputy Director &nerd, Director of Research and Assistant Directors for finances and for physical plant Director of Administration. s8rvic8s complete the administration whilst each research Director. and training programrne is also under the control 357. of an Assistant The total personnel varies between 1000 and 1200; at the time of the Review the Institute had 54 scientists from 20 different countries and there were four vacancies. in senior recruited priorities turnover, real factors. 358. During the past three years the Institute Staff; during 20 staff hss had a considerable turnover members have resigned This haa included Various factors and 27 new staff have contributed members have been to this high rate of of that period. rise major changes in the top management with consequent depression education have been important at the Institute. but the rapid of living in the cost of living child standards and problems with To house its Senior scientific staff and senior technical Support staff, and,in IITA has to provide on-site housing; 41 bungalows and 16 flats addition, 16 houEles are rentted in the city of Ibadsn. 359. are available On8 of the unique features of IITA amongst the international centres is the need to provide complete services, including water, sewerage and a large Standby electricity generating facility capable of carrying much of its electrical load. This m8a?M that any addition to staff not only creates a demand for additional housing but Contributes to increasing the dsmand for those Other services aa well. Thus, whilst the Institute has ample land on its main station it lacks the other facilities for any sizable additions for further development, to its senior staff. The management has made a very careful study of this, taking into account that the addition of each Senior staff member creates a need for housing, additional laboratory and office 8tC. space, vehicles, accommodation for pre and/or post-doctoral f8llOWS, It These in turn place additional demands on all the service facilities. would appear from this study that only on8 or two new staff members could be the present facilities. The CalCulatiOnS show that th8 capital accommodat8d within costs involved in adding new senior staff (in 1980) would be $2.8 million for five new members and $3.8 million for 10 new members. It should also b8 emphasized - 84’ - that to keep these services on the station. functional the Institute services for all the senior must provide technical all the mechanical and have a staff 8nd electrical instruments orueia.l 360. maintenance and repair in the smooth running its senior staff, equipment, vehicles support Consequently role of the station. in the research graduates, programmes, IITA prWid8S of scientific To support to senior trainee scientists mainly local 20 scientific support but the ratio support research scientists scientists of the institutes including is only about 1 to 2, a much lower ratio than in most has a large post-doctoral and graduate in the system. The Institute heavily on these to supply support and fisld WOrk8rS. to senior Currently it the supervision of laboratory fellows programme and relies has positions 3610 for 25 post-doctoral and 35 r8S88.Eh fellows and scholars* In addition to its on-campus staff, IITA ha8 20 staff members in cooperative programmes in seven countriies and it is planned to increase this number to 36 in 1978. The administrative the Director &neral (Special Projects). 362. of the cooperative progrsmmes is prwided and Deputy Director General, assisted by the Administrator leadership by In 1976 the CGIAR Review COrnmitt for staff through and IITA has started personal staff widely its recommended that the centres advertise to do so* Hitherto IITA has located most of contacts. and professional (ii> 363. Programme Planning, For its Budgeting and Balance a new approach concentrating 1978 Budget, IITA ha8 initiated programme plan whioh could then be translated into on the cost development of a clear 818m8ntS. descriptors This plan sets out a series showing the objectives, Each of these was prepsred by the person leading requirements. by his supervisor of programme, project or support unit an outline of the long term goals and the staff the work, reviewed lhis approach is and passed through the Director of Researche UniqU8 among th8 CentXeS@ When it can. be fully implemented, it should provide a However, the Institute ha8 not yet strong factual basis for management decisions. developed a detailed overall future programme or financial plan (with the exception of the capital plan) which will accommodate these objectives. 364. The Institute ha8 had subst8.ntidlprogramrne and financial growth wer the past in 1975 few years and cop8 operating costs are expected to double from $7.2 million - 85 - to a projected plans, total In addition, $4.7 $14.1 million in 1980. However, the planned inorease in expenditure between 1977 and 1980 is dU8 almost OOmpl8tely to inflation. According to present staff positions ar8 not expected to increase b8tw8en 1978 and l$l81, its budg8t for special projects will rise from $2.5 million in 1977 to in million 1978 with $3.7 million foreseen in 1980. substantial additions capital d8v8lOpm8nt at the time of its Although there was dedication, considerable capital plans to deV8lOpm8nt that have occurred spend around $5 million study for 1978 throUgh 1981 which has set out in detail period. fellows, This includes constnrotion of houeing Units a new medical clinic, a gr88nhoUs8, storage research since then and in the years 1977-80 the Institute For this, it has pr8par8d a oapital on oapitak for senior staff th8 expected naeds wer for roots and post-doctoral and tubers, facilities and d8velopmsnt of additional areas on the IITA farm. The oosts of capital deV8lopment have been increased greatly by the high building costs and a very high rats of inflation which is projected to b8 1s CompoUndedper month. Consequ8ntly, building costs by the end of f981 are exp8Ot8d to b8 double thOS8 at the beginning of 1978. research operating costs was spent on farming systems, 24% on grain legumes, 20$ on cereals and 2% on roots and rubera. These all together represent 55% of the total core operating budget. Of th8 remaind8r, 6.5% was spent 365. In 1977, 37% of the total on training and 34% on administration and general operating costs, and similar ratios are proposed through 1980. These ratios have changed somewhat since 1973 when F'SP absorbed 45$, CIP 15% and TRIP 15%; ULIP has shown Virtually no change. (iii) 366. Organization and Management of Scientific Disciplines Under the Mr8CtOr of Research the progremmes ar8 organiz8d along commodity lines with multidisciplinary teams of pathologists, entomologists, physiologists, etc*, within the commodity group. IITA, of course, is unique in having a large fanning systems programme in which some of th8Se disciplines are represented and which also contains a larg8 8nvironmsnta.l soiences group. There is no formal management for each diSOiplin8 are conalong discipline-oriented lines, but the laboratories tiguous so that scientists can aasily interact informally. The concerted support that 8aoh discipline, pathology, programme is essential, 367. entomology, nematology, etc. prwides to the entire There are also a number of scientific virology Unit, analytical services support units such as statistical germplasm colleotion unit, 88NiC88, laboratory, which ar8 under the general institute-wide functions. 368, 8tC., direotion of the Director of Research and 88rve \Jhilst the cooperative input programmss are under the general I%Reral, into these progrsmmes~ management of the staff oonsid- Dir8CtOr General snd Deputy Dir8CtOr th8 Programme Leaders and their Some of these involv8 ha=?8 a very substantial 8rabl8 travel* 369. It was noted in psrsgraph 328 that the Institute relies heavily on its post- do&oral fellows and graduate IW8s3Wh trabne86 in the research programmes. Whilst the personnel costs of the post-doctor4 fellows are financed from the budget for Conference and Training (38 of this budget), their contribution to the research progrsmmes is extrem8ly for there this category is no consist8nt important policy for as reflected allOcatiOR in the continually programmes. of post-doctoral increasing demand of staff from the research However, it appears that pOSitiO%s among progrsmmes. (iv) 370. Station Msnsgement government originally 80 ha for The Nig8ria.n prwided IITA with 1000 ha for station its main On work station and has reccentPy provided csn be irrigated. the high rainfall at On&. the main statlo% 90 ha of this 450 ha of land have b8n d8v8lOp8d of which 225 ha are arable; have a total th8 management of the farm has taken has been intensified and zero tillage has reduoed real costs in spite of an will be managed by an assistant farm on-site machinery to make the station of msnage- The farm manager and his assistant Considerable reorganization of place in the past two years; erosion control introduced, Increasing u8e of mechanization increased work load. The substation at On& msnag8r who will be Supplied with sufficient Self SuffiCi8nt iR this ment of the experimental force of 58. reSp8Cto The Pan81 is impr8668d by the standard stat ions. b> 37’ 1. Conclusions and Recommendations The administration of IfTA has had to contend with several difficult problems ineluding a lack of well-trdned supgsrt staff (at avery l&e1 and at reasonable cost), a high in-country inflation rate , a high turnw8r its of staff and the necessity to be almost completely for mediosl treatment, self-contained for all The lack of well-trained major servicee including those and dependable support staff - 87 - pregents problems in efficient operation of both laboratory and field of services responsible for vehicle end equipment maintenance. 372, work and The Panel stroaRly staff report supports the efforts by management to obtain concerned: A promotion scientists. that also deserve system close coopincludes pera eration detailed potential 373. between the adm$nistration end the scientists in the selection of support for the research progrsmmes. than seniority,and qualified that staff on its a training system that on performance by the supervising but oapable staff, the Institute and rewarding personnel and. rewards strong formance rather would develop the full support. the of lowly The Panel feels support it worthwhile would be better them better so that with local policies served by restrioting for performance. in labour staff number of total find IITA might relationships as often engaging a consultant experience to advise the Institute trained happens at present. who. havs been would not be attracted away by better opportunities elsewhere, The Panel feels that the Director of Researoh maJr need more immediate control wer the budgets of all the research programmes including the support units. Ry this means he would be able to enoourage cooperation between progrsmmes* Some closer 374. control over the allocation and use of land and labour for on-station experiments also would be desirable. The Panel recognizes programme and suggests that 375. the major role of post-doctoral this be recognized by including of post-doctoral fellowship assessments of up-to-date fellows in the research the total cost in the positions should be progremmes. within research budget. The allocation and accurate based on detdled priorities - 88 - The IITA mandate, _p_inter elia, provides for the Institute s-k.0make available the results of its studies snd research carried out in aooordance with the paragraphs 3% (a) to (d) to nations with segiontit of national 371. and institutions progrsmmesu"' wJ$ch wish to use them through cooperation IITA has interpreted this mandate in as of development and in the context of the state and national research wide and flexible a sense as possible capabilities in Africa, preconditions invitation agrioultural for the initiation from a The Pane9 noted the specific (a) a clear IITA in a national for of IITA cooperative body to progrsmmes whioh include involve (9) potential national or regional 8~1regional research and development programme; information relevant component; and the generation of scientific and technioal to the InstituteBs mandate; (c) the incorporation of a training (d) appropriate arrangements for finenoieil support, (ii) 3’ 78, Major Achievements The Panel visited five of the current seven cooperative programmes including the National Acoelerated Pood Production Programme of Nigeria, the Sierra Leone Rice the Tanzania/IITA Plaize and Gr&n Le@;wnes Project, the Liberian Rice Research Project, Project and the .Zairean/IITA National Manioo Programme. These cooperative programmes of vary considerably in terms of the agreement, the antecedents to the initiation the progaammes, the involvement of national or regional partioipation, duration, and the details of their IITA, the sources of funding, the levels of the level of cooperation with other IARCs, their objectives and strategies, For example, in the case of PRCNAM in Zsire, IITA is involved in a programme of research and training for the increase of cassava production through the identification and development of high-yielding and two insect and high quality and mite pests; cassava varieties the programme itself resistant to three major diseases was initiated beoause of the serious outbreak of cassava bacterial blight disease (CBB) and the cassava meaJ.ybugc of the Federal 'Ministry of Agriculture and Rural In Nigeria8 IITA, on -:heinvitaticn Development, evaluation six basis beceme involved in a significant research planning, pilot testing and programme designed to increase measurably the domestic production of food cropa: caesavag maize, rice (which are part of IITA's mandate) and outside the mandate)* para 8, millet, g sorghum and wheat (which lie text See the full of the mandate da Chapter II, -8g- 379. The Panel believes that IITA has approaohed the problem in Nigeria own limitations in some aress. with Inte-IARC oollabofi tion is involved in the efforts on sorghum, millet and wheat* and the opportunity to catalyze and participate in en integrated national crop improvement progrsmse wes seized without opportunities duction of involvement, Leone and Liberia rice production for serious off-site charaoterize disruption testing to the exeoution (minikit Similar of IITAts kit main reslism and apl awareness of its mandate. and intro- Rather, and production progremmes on rice resistance trials) of IITA materials were enlarged. cooperative results opportunities, but with less depth improvement in Sierra work on upland and swamp for increase of rice where agronomic and host plant with have produced significant in West Africa. a good potential (iii) 380. Conclusions and Recommendations the generally weak state of national agrioultural resesroh The Panel recognizes in many African countries, in consequence of which IITA has been, and oontinues to be, under very hesvy pressure from developing countries and donors to participate in a considerable number of orop improvement progremmes, end in some oeses in crop disaster or emergency situations. have so far The various opportunities been absorbed by the programmes without that drawn into national research and pressures presented to IITA serious repercussions but the greater discriminat.ion to coordination and management rol,es Panel wishes to caution avoid being inevitably in national IITA might have to exeroise progremmes which would not be appropriate. this note of caution should not be aonstrued 381. The Panel ’ wishes to emphasize that countries the great assistance as denying cooperating benefits of drawing on the experience, advice and help of IITA - whioh IITA already and technioal gives and which is a effectiveness of IITA in reflection of oonfldence in the scientific many areas of tropical agriculture. 382. The Panel nevertheless feels that too deep end inappropriate involvement of IITA in the management of national progrsmmes aarries the potential danger of overstretching the management and resources of the Institute and of exposing the Institute to unnecessary criticisms in the went of programme failures due to non-technical fn this rega,& referenoe was made by the Psnel to weaknesses beyond its control. guidelines u provided in the CGIAR Review Committee Report of January 1977.u Aotivities with Rational Progrsmmee p. 82, Range of Cooperative - go - The Panel would suggest that bilateral donors be made aware of this problem 3830 so that IITA can be protected from undue pressure to undertake inappropriate oontra.ctor relationships. The Panel would also urge IfTAts management to weigh oarefully the oapacity 384. of nationa;l programmers to support an Institute-based crop improvement programme before undertaking extent Institutete"s a contract. control It should be prepared the technical to faoe hard decisions, factors even to the beyond the of withdrawing from a programme, if are preventing the non-technical success of the programme. The Panel commends the healthy 385. interactions on research and treining between and mutually benefioial relationships and between IITA and the Nigerian government and other institutions of higher learning such as the Universities of Ibadan, Ife and Ahmadu Eello. It recommends that these interactions be strengthened for their mutual benefit and for the advancement of applied agricultural science in proSuch cooperation should preferably be extended as well to duction and development. other institutions on the African that three continent. additional cooperative programmes involving Camerow, The Panel notes 386. Upper Volta and Ghana exists or is envisaged in the development of 387. tive are planned between now and 1980 and that fruitful collaboration between IITA and such bodies es FAO, SAFGRAD,USAID and lBBRAF'A these programmesg the important scientific inputs provided by other coopera- The Panel reoognizes programmes and linkages with advanced institutions in the developed countries. Such contributions in the fields of plant physiology, biochemistry and microbiology have made signifieent contributions to Ihe core programme of IITA. While the Panel encourages the strengthening of these linkages, it also encourages IITA to seek actively and to exploit opportunities for such linkages with African institutions of higher learning that possess the requisite facilities and expertise. The Panel notes the agreement reached with ICIPE in the area of contract researcht both basic and applied, necessary to backstop pest management progremmes %a. at II!& financing The Panel fully be found for its supports early these arrangements implementation0 and urges that adequate The Panel finds that in the initiation and development of cooperative 389. in Africa there are same csses of lack of full consultation and cooperation progrsmmes among - 91 - IARCS. The Panel wishes to emphasize that the preamble to IITA*s mandate, which clearly envisages cooperation *within the system of international e&cultural research institutes", be &awn to the attention of the Boards of Trustees and Directors General of the IARCs in order to ensure more effeotive cooperation and collaboration in the advsnoement of orop improvement in Africa and the resolution of outstanding issues on crop mandates and frameworks for cooperation. - 92 - @H#Prn xn.B CONCMJSIONS AIfD ~~~TIO~S G‘ onclusions Cj.1 IITA was origirndly given a broad and somewhat ambitious mandate to develop 390* improved methods and technologies in the humid tropics which would replace or improve sh:if&ing specific cultivatdon objectives, practices. formulated as basically To this end, the Institute has progressively a research strategy and programme structures sound and rational. The research defined which the Panel considers problems addressed by the Institute are probably the broadest, most complex and challenging among those encountered by the centros and institutes in the CGTARsystem. Because of the difficulty of the problems faced in shifting cultivation, progress in this type of research is necessarily will slow and uneven and, assuming success9 its take time, Moreover, it impact on land IITA use in tha tropics should be kept in mind that was established at a time when the host country experienced severe difficulties which resulted in important delays in the building of its infrastructure. 397. vigor The Panel is satisfied and enthusiasm, and that in recruiting Ibis that the scientific research senior work at IITA is oonducted with are generally IITA, staff in accord institute. however, experof the the standards its of research and support with those expected of an international iences difficulties of staff reseazroh* turnover. and has a high rate has been sometimes disruptive to the continuity Ix spite of these difficulties and problems, the Institute has made impressive 392. p artioularly -advances in the improvement of some basic food crops in the tropics, in oassava where lines with high yielda and resistance to some of the major diseases have been produoed. The Panel considers that the Institute is at the threshold of significant breakthrowhs in oowpea and yam improvement, and that its present work on sweet potato (in which significant achievements have been attdned) and on maize will provide in Africa an essential and increasing comnlement to that of other Some of these materials are already being tested and -IARCs snd national agencies. in some cases disseminated through national researoh and production programmes~ Another major achievement relates were assembled at PITA from Africa for further pro6lpess~in all to the broad-based germplasm collections and other regions and provide a valuable which resource IITA crop improvement programmesa The Institute has assembled a strong body of knowledge and experience in 393. the very complex field of farming systems research in the humid and subhumid tropics. - 93 - !&e Panel oommendathe comprehensive, by the Institute in this regard and its integrated end purpoeeful approaches followed emphasis on the improvement of the conditions teohniques of land management and cropping on the main site of the Institute. The its research end testing methods and practices the lor+tenn effects of its proposed of the smell farmer in Africa. Promising systems are being tested and demonstrated farming farming 394. mystems teem is now developing while oontinuing praotioes and technologies in other sites, to study on the main site. exoellent and extensive publioation programme of training and information The Panel commends IITA for its of its provides library, whioh it and for the quality services documentation, to an increasing audience. with adequate physical for its work. facilities The 395 l The Panel found that which, if it IITA has been prwided are well and services Institute, the policy 396. in general, managed end suited however, would faoe major constraints were to further expand its of the Institute which tends to limit at Headquarters in housing and servioe facilities The Panel approves staff at Ibadan. its growth at the main site. IITA is inoreasingly oultural research in Africa requests for cooperative several of these programmes and is happy to report contributions in this management oapaoities. 397. reoognized as a oentre of excellence in tropical egriand has responded in a valid manner to increasing The Panel visited progremmes with countries in Africa. that IITA is making important its staff and being mindful not to overextend regard while The Panel is satisfied that an overall balance has been achieved, and is expeoted to be maintained Institute's programme. It of the programme activities Board in consolidating among the programmes. achieved,to assist It in the years to come,among the main components of the notes the close inter-relatedness end complementarity of the Institute and apprwes the present policy of the structure end maintaining close cooperation balance research. also supports the efforts mede,and the overall the present the main programmes by adequate disciplinary (ii) 398. Recommendations The Panel has made a series of recommendations on each of the progremmes end of the Institute in the preceding chapters. It fully realizes that activities - 94 - these individual and its ~~~endatio~ have to be ooneidered oontext by the management of the Centre of the resources Board of Trustees of the fact issues require in the broader that several of the allocation which are expeoted to be made available also conscious facing that till several not have immediate solutions further time available to IITA in the years to come. on the basis this The Panel is of the problems which the Institute is of these recommendations,and than was possible assessment and consideration Review. in the short to the Panel for IITA has reached a stage in its development at which it must make some oritical 399. choices in its priorities for future progress and impaot. It should ascertain, verify and consolidate the geographical validity of the experimental farming systems and tackle the second generation It hss been pointed out already, problems which have emerged from its work so far. however, that many additional staff members for new activities cannot be accommodated at IITA headquarters without a very substantial additional capital expenditure ) and thus would require careful consideration of the likely cost/benefit ratio. The Panel firmly believes that priority should be given by IITA over the coming years to a range of actions aimed at consolidating and cits activities. To this end, the Panel recommends that the 'Board continue its efforts to increase the precision of the mandate of the Institute and that the management reinforce and utilized the existing for formulation mechanisms whereby priorities in the next five years. and consolidation, on various can be goals set more clearly which the Institute 400. of plans addressed to specific might expeot to attain which may contribute the next five Among the actions to such concentration recommendations the Panel recommends for activities (1) reviewed years the oonsideration from the Panel's chapters: of the following measures which have been synthesized in the preceding Fsp: a) to Rive nrioritg systems presently b) to the validation being developed and off-site evaluation of at IITA for the subhumid zone; to proceed with research in the humid zone where feasible in collaboration with national or regional institutes, and limit work at On&, for the time being, to system components rather than fu3.1 system synthesis and testing; c> not to undertake with vegetables, plant breeding within ??SPand only consider work spp. or tree csopa if there ia evidence - 95 - that they are essential to the viability eaological of the farming aones; agro-forestry systems research of IITA in partiouler to avoid reaesrch to the present to relocate cultural on animals snd to limit activities project; staff position made available from agri- one senior engineering; the disoipline to faoilitate FSP; the organizational structure within FSP by the of sgronoqy is strengthened cooperation within to ensure that the Institute programmes with d to strengthen selection of crop improvement of a Deputy Programme Leader. a) b) to maintain to provide top priority on all aspects of cassava improvement; (one additional breeder and an two core positions entomologist) in the Zaire prcgrsmme tointensify cassava mealybug and green spider mite; c) work on the to ensure adequate faoilities and support for the genetic improvement of white gems (if necessary by internal re-arrangements); to continue level, improvement work on sweet potato for African conditions. at its present cl) but solely a) to concentrate bean, pieon breeding work; on oowpea and soybean, while lceepi work on lima without further pea and winged bean at a low level b) to increase cooperation with FSP, particularly biology and crop management. in soil micro- (4) CIp a) to maintain top priority in CIP on research and in-country testing to solve the major constraints on African maize and rice production; - g6 - b) to breed for timwn on major African pest, disease and stress tolerance, with focussed FSP; activities IRRI ecosystems, in close cooperation research institutes, c) to pureue integration with other national and CIMMYT; of IITA cereal and international and training especially d) to expand IITA's IITA. competence in upland rice of an experienced rice improvement, and to encourage the posting breeder from IRRI to (5) RESEClRCH SUPPORT a) to concentrate African storage b) further exploration by the germplasm unit on those orops which are within IITA's and documentation facilities; unit mandate, and to complete to keep the virology positions, at tile proposed level an electron microscope; of two staff equipped with 4 to expand statistical servioes for the design and analysis of field experiments by adding one senior staff member and by improving computer facilities; to pursue all possible measures to alleviate present constraints on the exchange of germplasm due to quarantine regulations. ,d) (6) COOPEiRATIvE PROGRAm a) b) to concentrate on and consolidate existing cooperative programmes; and to oontinue to be seleotive in responding to opportunities pressures for expanded cooperative prCgS?anUnes; to reinforoe in Africa; IITA*s research end training linkages c) with institutions d) to imprwe consultation, joint planning and cooperation in the development of cooperative programmes in Africa. among IARCs 401. for The Panel is aware of the problems which the above reoommendations may oreate the management of the Institute where they cannot be implemented immediately. feels it may be helpful to give the mane@ment some indication The Panel therefore - 97 - of its priorities 4 among the reoommendations which mag have budgetary implications: The appointment of at least with that of a rice breeder position in Zaire together one core staff as indicated above for the CIP programme sre given first priority, because of the potential threat that the mealybug and spider mite problems pose to cassava production in other b) countries in Central Africa and because of the importance to the second core position third priority Unit. of the rice progrsmme. second priority in Zaire to the of Statisticiaqand the Virology The Panel gives support staff and to the new position member for The Panel is confident 402. flexibility and opportunities that the above recommendations that the management of the Institute core and non-core has sufficient budgets to ensure in the use of its indicated in its forward use of PDFs and the new positions already earmarked in the budgets proposed for next three years should permit desirable internal readjustments. These internal readjustmenta be facilitated and regional do not necessarily modify the development plans The existing and forthcoming vacanoies, the projections. the within the planned limits of the budget of IITA until 1980 should by the policy of the Doard to strengthen its commitment to cooperative prograsnmes end to limit capita3 expenditure at Headquarters. Finally, the Panel wishes to express to the management of the Institute 403. and its staff its gratitude fortheir close collaboration in the conduct of this and expresses support the hope that its recommendations Institute fully will merits. help in ensuring from CGIAR which this Review. the continuing - 98 - ACKNOWLXDGEXEW'S The Panel efforts Centre's gratefuliy secretarial considerable report the through wishes to express continued staff the its deep appreciation displayed its for by the the made and the Director cooperation to facilitate and its task. It acknowledges staff time at IITA assistance of the members of the who devoted and typing the which first staff of this of and the to the It TAG Secretariat preparation warmly Unit and care several drafts. thanks of IITA Comranications and Information the ensured, draft. so diligently and efficiently, printing of the CONPOSITIOR OF TBE REVIEW PANEL ---_. Prof. Cuy Cemus (Chairman) Director General Office de la Recherche Scientifique Outre-Mer (ORSTOM) 24 rue Bayard 75008 Paris, France et Technique Dr. R. Abrams (Member) Director Agricultural Experiment Station Faoulty of Agriculture, Dept. of Agronomy University of Puerto Rico Mayague Puerto Rico 00708 Dr. T. Ajibola-Qylor Director Institute of A&culturai University of Ife P,M.B. 5029 Moor Plantation Ibadan, Nigeria (Member) Research and Training Dr. J. L. Brewbaker (Member) Professor of Horticulture College of Tropical Agriculture University of Hawaii St. John Plant Science Laboratory 3190 Maile Way Honolulu Hawaii 96822 102 Dr. J. L. Dillon (Member) Faculty of Economic Studies Department of Agricultural Economics Management University of New England Armidale, N.S.W. 2351 Australia Dr. H. C. Dion (Member) Special Adviser - Agriculture Renewable Resources Division Special Advisers Branch Canadian International Development 122 Bank Street Ott awag Canada and Business Agency : 1-e Prof. J. D. Ferwerda (Member) Professor of Tropical Agriculture Agricultural University of Wageningen Wageningen The Netherlands Prof. Dr. G. Fisohbeck (Member) Lehrstuhl Planzenbau und PlanzenzUchtung Technische Universit% Mtiohen 8050 Freising-Weihenstephan Federal Republic of Germany Prof. I?. G. Grogan (Member) Professor of Plant Pathology College of Agricultural and Environmental University of California at Davis Davis, California USA Dr. D. Plucknett (Member) Professor of Agronomy College of Tropical Agriculture Department of Agronomy and Soil University of Hawaii 3190 Mails Way Honolulu, Hawaii 96822 Prof. P. B. H, Tinker Head of Soils and Plant Rothamsted Experimental Harpenden, Herts. England Nutrition Station Sciences Science Dept. Mahler (Secretary) * Mr. P.J. Executive Secretary Technical Advisory Committee Food and Agriculture Organization Via delle Terme di Caracalla 00100 Rome Italy Dr. J. K. Coulter (Observer) Scientific Adviser CGIAR Secretariat 1818 H Street, N.W. Washington D,C. 20433 USA of the United Nations * Mr. B. N. Webster, Group which visited Deputy Exeoutive Secretary, Tanzania in May TAC, acted as Secretary of the AYt?NEx II I. Review of IITA's Activities in Tanzania Brewbaker and Webster) (Messrs. Csmus, Ajibola4'aylor, Thursdey 12 Mey: a.m. Visit to M inistry of Agrioulture, Visits to Dar-es-Salaam stations p.m. to Monday 16 Mq: Ilonga and Liyamungu research Tuesday 17 and Wednesday 18 May Round-up discussions Dsr-esSalaam at M inistry of Agriculture and with USAID, II. Review of IlTA Activities in Zaire (Manioo Programme) Brewbaker and Plucknett) (Messrs. Camus, Ajibola-Tsylor, Sunday 16 and Monday 17 October Visits to the linistries of Agriculture and Planning, Foundation, and the USAW offices, Kinshasa Tuesday 18 October the Rockefeller Presentation of the PROKAM research and training activities, visits to M'vuazi, Kimpeae (CEDECO) and Vsnga cooperative inoluding trials III. Review of IITA Activities in Sierra Leone and Liberia (Messrs. Dion and Fischbeck) Tuesday 18 end Wednesday 19 October Visit to the Liberia/IDA/IITA 21 Rice Research Project October Thursday 20 and Friday Visit to the Sierra Leone/FAO/IITA Rice Research Project nr. Review (Messrs. of IITA Abrems, Activities Dillon, in Bigeria Ferwerda, Grogan and Tinker) Monday 17 October Visit to the Federal Department of Agriculture, Lagos Tuesday 18 October of NAPPP, and visit 21 October two groups:visited and the the Eational Root Community Development for Agricultural Development to National Cereals Research General presentation Institute, Ibadan Wednesdey 19 to Friday up into The team split 1. Messrs. Abrams, Ferwerda and Tinker Crop Research Institute at Umudike, Project at Warri 2. Messrs. Dillon and Grogan visited the Institute Research at Samaru, and the Funtua A&cultural Project at Samaru and Kaduna v. Review of IITA team) Activities at Headquarters, Ibadan (The whole Sunday 23 October a m Team assembled A* p.m. Campus visit 24 October presentation of GLIP and CIP at 1IT.A in and briefing Ibadan session Yondag a.m. p.m. General Presentations 25 October Tuesday a m LO p.m. Presentations Presentation of TRIP and FSP of research support programmesand training progra.mme II-3 Wednesday The review elements Friday a.m. p.m. 26 and Thursday 27 October mission split up into two groups for reviews of individual of FSP and crop improvement progrsmmes respectively 28 October Presentation programmes Presentations information, 29 October team visited members held Onn4 Station further by chartered disoussions with flight programme of the training programme (contd.) and cooperative of library and dooumentation, communication and research support facilities end station operation Saturday The FSP review The other leaders zuclday Report review 30 October writing - first draft Monday 31 October Draft report writing to Thursday 3 November by Review Panel and staff on specific and disoussions with Additional subjects Friday a.m. p.m. discussions If Director-General 4 November Finalization Presentation and printing of Panel's of draft conclusions report to the Institute's Directorate 1/ The Chairman and a few Panel members also visited Prof. Yonderi, Dean, Agrioulture and Forestry Department at the University of Ibadan, and in the morning of Monday 31 October. senior staff at the University, ANNM III LIST OF MAIN DOCUMENTSWADE AVAILABLE TO THE REVIEW PANEL 1. Briefing document for TAC 0,uinquennial Quinquennial Review Review, Mission IITA - 4 September 1977 2. 3. 4. c; .. 6. Progress report on IITA (DDD/TAC:IAR/77/15) 16th TAC meeting of TAG on IITA - May 197'7 - Exaerpt from the report of the Review - (DDD/TAC: m/77/17) IITA IITA IITA IITA Annual Budget Budget Budget Reports Proposal Proposal Proposal - 1975, 16th meeting Quinquennial 1976 July 1978 - Revised 1977 1977 - July 1978 - Programme Tasks - July 1978 - Capital Development 7. 8. Study 1977 Review of Production and Trade of Ride, Maize, Cassava, Yam and Sweet Potato in Seleoted Countries of Tropical Africa by F. E. Winch and C. D. Kivunja IITA - October 1977 Note: In addition, programme the the Panel received and for briefing the visits doouments to Sierra for each of the and to presentations On.& Station Leone, cooperative and Zaire. programmes in Tanzania, Liberia, Nigeria I . . M/L6485/Et10.7811/250