Vol.:(0123456789) Aquaculture International https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-024-01467-7 1 3 RESEARCH Assessing women’s empowerment, participation, and engagement in aquaculture in Bangladesh Lucy Njogu1,2 · Rahma Adam1 · Cathy Rozel Farnworth3 Received: 3 August 2023 / Accepted: 11 March 2024 © The Author(s) 2024 Abstract Women’s empowerment and gender equality are key goals for development and human rights. However, a significant gap still exists in achieving these twin goals. Formulating appropriate strategies for women’s empowerment requires first understanding context-spe- cific patterns and sources of disempowerment. We use data collected using a questionnaire survey from 1653 households in Rangpur and Rajshahi districts in Bangladesh. Guided by an analytic tool that measures women’s empowerment, inclusion and agency (the project level Women’s Empowerment in Fisheries and aquaculture Index (pro-WEFI)), and using seven empowerment indicators, we provide findings on the status of women’s empower- ment, participation, and engagement in aquaculture in Bangladesh. Results show that women were highly involved in making household decisions, mainly jointly with their hus- bands. However, data suggest a substantial gap in women’s access to financial services, in participation in aquaculture activities, and in access to and control over productive capital and remuneration for aquaculture labor. Finally, despite some women achieving adequacy on some indicators, most women in fish farming households in Bangladesh lack adequacy on many of the selected indicators. Keywords Women’s empowerment · Gender · Aquaculture · Fish · Bangladesh Handling Editor: Gavin Burnell * Rahma Adam rahmashubi@gmail.com; R.Adam@cgiar.org Lucy Njogu lnjogu.gathoni@gmail.com Cathy Rozel Farnworth cathyfarnworth@hotmail.com 1 WorldFish Kenya, c/o International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi 00100, Kenya 2 School of Global Development, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK 3 Pandia Consulting, Teigelkamp 64, 48145 Münster, Germany http://crossmark.crossref.org/dialog/?doi=10.1007/s10499-024-01467-7&domain=pdf Aquaculture International 1 3 1. Introduction Worldwide, aquaculture supports livelihoods based on the sustainability of life below water (Sustainable Development Goal - SDG 14). Aquaculture has the potential to play a significant role in reducing hunger (SDG 2), eliminating poverty (SDG 1), and gender equality (SDG 5) (Troell et al. 2023). Bangladesh is the fifth-largest aquaculture fish pro- ducer worldwide (FAO 2017; Murphy et al. 2020). An estimated 4.27 million Bangladeshi households have at least one fishpond (Choudhury et al. 2017). In rural Bangladesh, fish play an important role in income generation and household food consumption. It provides between 2.8 and 15% of household income, and 26–47% of household food consumption (Choudhury et al. 2017). Fish contribute about 60% of animal protein intake in poor rural households (Shamsuzzaman et al. 2020). On average, 13% of household expenditure is on fish (Apu et al. 2014). However, the subsector is yet to achieve its full potential (Islam et al. 2016; Jui and Rahman 2018). Productivity is low (Kruijssen et al. 2016. More rapid aqua- culture development is necessary to meet increasing fish demand, given that per capita con- sumption is expected to rise (Haque et al. 2020). Ensuring that this development is gender- equitable is an important challenge facing development actors. Women are important in aquaculture in Bangladesh, though comprehensive data about the importance of women in aquaculture is lacking (Rahman and Naoroze 2007; Huq et al. 2016). Involving women in paid aquaculture work promotes their purchasing power and financial free- dom (FAO 2017). It also increases their social status, family income, aquaculture productivity, and nutrition (Farnworth et al. 2015; Jui and Rahman 2018; Kruijssen et al. 2018). Reports based on national datasets indicate that Bangladesh has made significant strides towards gen- der parity in a range of sectors through increasing the participation of women in a variety of political and socio-economic activities (Center or Research and Information 2019). However, the limited data available suggests high levels of gender-based inequality in aquaculture (Ishita 2019; Huq et al. 2016; Choudhury and McDougall 2018). There is still a dearth of information on women’s involvement in aquaculture in Bangladesh and the degree to which their participa- tion has the potential to be empowering (Aregu et al. 2018; Kruijssen et al. 2018). This study aims to contribute to the limited database. It aims to describe the  existing characteristics of women in aquaculture households and it assesses women’s empowerment using a range of indicators. To do this, it analyses data drawn from a survey applied in 2020. This survey drew upon the pro-Women’s Empowerment in Fisheries Index (pro-WEFI) for its structure and analytic categories. Although the survey does not represent an application of the pro-WEFI, it does allow similar comparative data to be constructed and analyzed. 2. Methodology 2.1 Data collection Data used in this study were drawn from a large dataset created by the Aquaculture: Increasing income, diversifying diets, and empowering women (IDEA) in Bangladesh project baseline study (Worldfish  2020) which was funded by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF). The project focused on exploiting the untapped aquaculture poten- tial in Bangladesh (Barooah et al. 2022), particularly in Rangpur and Rajshahi divisions. High rates of undernutrition and poverty levels, especially among women and children, Aquaculture International 1 3 are reported in this area (Karim et al. 2021). Rajshahi and Rangpur are neighbor divi- sions located in the Northwestern region of Bangladesh, home to close 34 million peo- ple (Haque et al. 2020). The two divisions are served by the Ganga, Jamuna, and Brah- maputra rivers. These rivers provide conducive agro-ecologies for fish farming (Haque et al. 2020). Rajshahi division is located between 23°48′ and 25°16′ north latitudes and 88°01′ and 89°48′ east longitudes and measures 17974.68 sq km, with an average popu- lation of 20 million people (Barooah et al. 2022; Karim et al. 2021). Rangpur Division is located between 25°20′ and 26°37′ north latitudes and 88°50′ and 89°53′ east longi- tudes, measures about 16,185 square kms, with an average a population of about 17 mil- lion people (Barooah et al. 2022). The IDEA project used a household survey questionnaire to obtain data in relation to indicators for women’s empowerment from aquaculture households. The survey question- naire was administered to the primary decision-making woman in 1653 households from Rangpur and Rajshahi divisions (see Fig.  1), while data on household sharing of aqua- culture activities, hiring, and compensation for fish farming labor was collected from the household head. The survey was conducted in 2020 and the reference period was from June/July 2019 to June/July 2020 (reflecting the aquaculture production year). A stratified random sampling procedure was adopted for sample selection. The first level of categoriza- tion was based on business models (practice and outreach group and hybrid model). The second level of categorization was made based on the type of engagement of the farmers with the local service providers (LSPs) (practice group and outreach). Finally, the sample size for each group was determined based on 95% confidence and 5% precision. A total of 878 households in Rajshahi division and 775 households in Rangpur divisions were inter- viewed. In Rajshahi division, data was collected in Bogura, Naogan, Natore, and Rajshahi Fig. 1 Selected research areas in Rangpur and Rajshahi divisions in northwestern Bangladesh Aquaculture International 1 3 districts while in Rangpur, data was collected from Gaibandha and Rangpur districts. In total, data were collected from 36 Upazilas and 344 villages. 2.2 Data and concepts used for analysis The author team decided to use the pro-WEFI analytic framework to assess the IDEA sur- vey questionnaire data. Pro-WEFI is a development of the Pro-Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI), which in turn draws upon the Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI). The WEAI is a survey-based index which directly meas- ures women’s empowerment, agency, and inclusion in the agricultural sector at country or regional level (Malapit et al. 2014, 2015). Since its creation in 2012, WEAI has under- gone several adaptations. Pro-WEFI was tailored for projects in aquaculture and fisheries to facilitate the standardized measurement of the empowerment, agency, and inclusion of women. Pro-WEFI is a composite of women’s empowerment and gender parity sub-indices. The women’s empowerment sub-index is weighted at 90% for pro-WEFI and the gender parity sub-index at 10%. The empowerment sub-index reflects the degree of women’s empower- ment based on three domains of empowerment (3DE) while the gender parity index (GPI) shows the proportion of women who are as empowered as the men in their households. For those households that have not achieved gender parity, the GPI sub-index shows the gap that needs to be closed for women to reach the same level of empowerment as men. In this study, only women were interviewed and so the GPI sub-index was not calculated. The 3DE is comprised of intrinsic agency (power within), instrumental agency (power to), and collective agency (power with) (Malapit et  al. 2019; Quisumbing et  al. 2021b; Intrinsic agency Instrumental agency Collective agency Autonomy in income Self-efficacy Attitudes about intimate-partner violence Respect among household members Input in productive decisions Ownership of land, ponds and other assets Access to and decisions on financial services Control over use of income Work balance Visiting important locations Group membership Membership in influential groups Gender a�tudes Fig. 2 The domains for pro-WEFI (Source: McDougall et al. 2022) Aquaculture International 1 3 Yount et al. 2019). It has 12 indicators (see Fig. 2). The gender attitude indicator was added to the pro-WEFI to help measure a project’s gender-transformative impacts (Quisumbing et al. 2021a). Pro-WEFI data are collected through a 3DE survey administered to men and women from the same households. An individual is scored as adequate or inadequate for each of the 12 indicators, which are equally weighted (Table 1). Each indicator has a pre-determined adequacy threshold. For instance, a woman is considered to have adequacy in the control over use of income if she has input in decisions on how to use income and output from all household agricultural and non-agricultural activities (provided a decision was actually made). A score of “1” is allocated to indicate adequacy, or “0” to indicate that the adequacy threshold was not met. The empowerment score is arrived at by aggregating the scores from the 12 indicators. If the respondent has an adequacy score of 9 out of 12 or above, he/she is considered empow- ered (Malapit et al. 2019). Conversely, respondents who do not achieve adequacy in 25% or more (4 out of 12 indicators) are categorized as disempowered. In this study, data were collected on seven indicators from female respondents. The authors computed indicators for autonomy in income, intrahousehold relationships, access to and control over productive capital, control over income, financial empowerment, and group membership. Results on input in productive and income decisions were analyzed through descriptive statistics, and not as a final indicator as generated in pro-WEFI. We also analyzed the gender attitude which is not a main component of the pro-WEFI, but usually added as a separate indicator in the WEAI and WEFI tools. It is intended to indi- cate the state of gender attitudes before and after intervention. The results on autonomy in income and input in income and productive decisions were presented using descriptive statistics. 3.Results 3.1 Descriptive statistics Respondent mean age was 38 years, with the youngest and the oldest being 18 and 75 years respectively (see Fig. 3). Almost all the respondents were married (approximately 2% were divorced, single, or widowed). A majority of the women had some level of formal educa- tion, while 35% had no formal schooling. The largest household comprised 14 members and the smallest 2 members (mean household size 4.6 persons). Average monthly house- hold expenditure was 12,398 Bangladeshi taka (BDT) (USD 123.98) in 2020, as at the time of data collection. The mean monthly consumption indicates that households in the study area were living slightly above the international poverty line of $2.15 per day per capita (World Bank 2023). 3.2 Results structured around pro‑WEFI indicators 3.2.1 Intrinsic agency Intrinsic agency (power within) is “the process by which one develops a critical. con- sciousness of one’s own aspirations, capabilities, and rights” (Yount et  al. 2019). To evaluate intrinsic agency, we used intrahousehold relationships and autonomy in income indicators. First, to assess adequacy in intrahousehold relationships, 4 statements were Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 1 A de qu ac y th re sh ol d fo r p ro -W EF I a nd a da pt at io ns m ad e in th e cu rr en t s tu dy Pr o- W EF I C ur re nt st ud y In tri ns ic a ge nc y   A ut on om y in in co m e M or e m ot iv at ed b y ow n va lu es th an b y co er ci on o r f ea r o f o th - er s’ d is ap pr ov al : r el at iv e au to no m y in de x (R A I) B sc or e ≥ 1. R A I s co re is c al cu la te d by su m m in g re sp on se s t o th e th re e vi gn et te s a bo ut a p er so n’ s m ot iv at io n fo r h ow th ey u se in co m e ge ne ra te d fro m a gr ic ul tu ra l a nd n on -a gr ic ul tu ra l a ct iv iti es (y es = 1; n o = 0) , u si ng th e fo llo w in g w ei gh tin g sc he m e: 0 fo r vi gn et te 1 (n o al te rn at iv e) , 2 fo r v ig ne tte 2 (e xt er na l m ot iv a- tio n) , 1 fo r v ig ne tte 3 (i nt ro je ct ed m ot iv at io n) , a nd + 3 fo r vi gn et te 4 (a ut on om ou s m ot iv at io n) In vo lv ed in a ny in co m e- ge ne ra tin g ac tiv iti es in de pe nd en tly a nd ta ke s p ar t i n m ak in g de ci si on s o n ho w th e in co m e w as to b e us ed , e ith er in di vi du al ly o r j oi nt ly w ith sp ou se s o r o th er h ou se - ho ld m em be rs .   S el f- effi ca cy “A gr ee ” or g re at er o n av er ag e fo r s el f- effi ca cy q ue sti on s: n ew ge ne ra l s el f- effi ca cy sc al e C sc or e ≥ 32   A tti tu de s a bo ut d om es tic v io le nc e B el ie ve s h us ba nd is N O T ju sti fie d in h itt in g or b ea tin g hi s w ife in a ll 5 sc en ar io s: (1 ) S he g oe s o ut w ith ou t t el lin g hi m , ( 2) S he n eg le ct s t he c hi l- dr en , ( 3) S he a rg ue s w ith h im , ( 4) S he re fu se s t o ha ve se x w ith hi m , ( 5) S he b ur ns th e fo od   I nt ra ho us eh ol d re la tio ns hi ps M ee ts A LL th e fo llo w in g co nd iti on s r el at ed to th ei r s po us e, th e ot he r r es po nd en t, or a no th er h ou se ho ld m em be r: (1 ) R es po nd - en t r es pe ct s r el at io n (M O ST o f t he ti m e) A N D , ( 2) R el at io n re sp ec ts re sp on de nt (M O ST o f t he ti m e) A N D , ( 3) R es po nd en t tru sts re la tio n (M O ST o f t he ti m e) A N D , ( 4) R es po nd en t i s co m fo rta bl e di sa gr ee in g w ith re la tio ns (M O ST o f t he ti m e) To a ss es s a de qu ac y in in tra ho us eh ol d re la tio ns 4 st at em en ts w er e po se d (T ab le  2 ). W om en w ho re sp on de d, “ hi gh e xt en t” or “ m ed iu m e xt en t” to e ac h th e fo ur st at em en ts w er e al lo ca te d a sc or e of “ 1, ” im pl yi ng th at th ey a ch ie ve d ad eq ua cy in th is in di ca to r. In str um en ta l a ge nc y   I np ut in p ro du ct iv e de ci si on s M ee ts a t l ea st O N E of th e fo llo w in g co nd iti on s f or A LL o f t he ag ric ul tu ra l a ct iv iti es th ey p ar tic ip at e in (1 ) M ak es re la te d de ci si on so le ly , ( 2) M ak es th e de ci si on jo in tly an d ha s a t l ea st so m e in pu t i nt o th e de ci si on s, (3 ) F ee ls c ou ld m ak e de ci si on if w an te d to (t o at le as t a M ED IU M e xt en t) Re su lts w er e pr es en te d in d es cr ip tiv e st at ist ic s ( pe rc en ta ge s) (T ab le s 2 a nd 4 )   A cc es s t o an d co nt ro l o ve r p ro du ct iv e ca pi ta l O w ns , e ith er so le ly o r j oi nt ly , a t l ea st O N E of th e fo llo w in g: (1 ) A t l ea st TH R EE sm al l a ss et s ( po ul try , n on -m ec ha ni ze d eq ui p- m en t, or sm al l c on su m er d ur ab le s) , ( 2) A t l ea st TW O la rg e as se ts , ( 3) L an d W om en w ho se h ou se ho ld s h ad a t l ea st on e of th e tw o as se ts a nd ha d th ei r n am es in th e ow ne rs hi p do cu m en ts , e ith er so le ly o r jo in tly w ith o th er p eo pl e, w er e co ns id er ed   t o ha ve a ch ie ve d ad eq ua cy in th is in di ca to r Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 1 (c on tin ue d) Pr o- W EF I C ur re nt st ud y   A cc es s t o fin an ci al se rv ic es M ee ts a t l ea st O N E of th e fo llo w in g co nd iti on s: (1 ) B el on gs to a h ou se ho ld th at u se d a so ur ce o f c re di t i n th e pa st ye ar A N D p ar tic ip at ed in a t l ea st O N E so le o r j oi nt d ec i- si on a bo ut it , ( 2) B el on gs to a h ou se ho ld th at d id n ot u se c re di t in th e pa st ye ar b ut c ou ld h av e if it w an te d to fr om a t l ea st O N E so ur ce , ( 3) H as a cc es s, so le ly o r j oi nt ly , t o a fin an ci al ac co un t Re sp on de nt ’s h ou se ho ld s h ad u se d cr ed it ei th er in c as h or k in d, in th e pa st on e ye ar , a nd re sp on de nt h ad p ar tic ip at ed in d ec id in g to ta ke lo an a nd h ow th e lo an s w er e to b e us ed . A ls o, re sp on de nt ha s a fi na nc ia l a cc ou nt , ( di gi ta l o r a t a ny fi na nc ia l i ns tit ut io n) , an d m ak es d ec is io ns a bo ut u til iz in g th e ac co un t a nd o w ne rs hi p of th e ac co un t ( Ta bl e  2) .   C on tro l o ve r u se o f i nc om e H as in pu t i n de ci si on s r el at ed to h ow to u se B O TH in co m e an d ou tp ut fr om A LL o f t he a gr ic ul tu ra l a ct iv iti es th ey p ar tic ip at e in A N D h as in pu t i n de ci si on s r el at ed to in co m e fro m A LL no n- ag ric ul tu ra l a ct iv iti es th ey p ar tic ip at e in , u nl es s n o de ci - si on w as m ad e Re sp on de nt s w er e as ke d ab ou t t he ir in vo lv em en t i n m ak in g de ci - si on s r eg ar di ng sa vi ng m on ey , i nv es tin g in in co m e- ge ne ra tin g ac tiv iti es , a nd ro ut in e ho us eh ol d pu rc ha se s o f b as ic it em s s uc h as fo od fo r d ai ly c on su m pt io n or o th er h ou se ho ld n ee ds , w he re th e ho us eh ol d m ad e su ch d ec is io ns . R es po nd en ts w ho h ad pa rti ci pa te d in m ak in g th e de ci si on s e ith er so le ly o r j oi nt ly w ith ot he r p eo pl e w er e co ns id er ed to h av e ac hi ev ed a de qu ac y in th is in di ct or .   T im e us e ag en cy W or ks le ss th an 1 0. 5  h pe r d ay : w or kl oa d = ti m e sp en t i n pr im ar y ac tiv ity + (1 /2 ) t im e sp en t i n ch ild ca re a s a se co nd ar y ac tiv ity   P hy si ca l m ob ili ty M ee ts a t l ea st O N E of th e fo llo w in g co nd iti on s: (1 ) V is its a t le as t T W O lo ca tio ns a t l ea st O N C E PE R W EE K o f ( ci ty , m ar - ke t, fa m ily /re la tiv e) o r ( 2) V is its a t l ea st O N E lo ca tio n at le as t O N C E PE R M O N TH o f ( he al th fa ci lit y, p ub lic m ee tin g) C ol le ct iv e ag en cy   G ro up m em be rs hi p A ct iv e m em be r o f a t l ea st O N E gr ou p B ei ng m em be r o f a g ro up M em be rs hi p in in flu en tia l g ro up s A ct iv e m em be r o f a t l ea st O N E gr ou p th at c an in flu en ce th e co m m un ity to a t l ea st a M ED IU M e xt en t Aquaculture International 1 3 posed (Table 2) during the survey. This indicator was analyzed by generating an ade- quacy score. Women who responded, “high extent” or “medium extent” to each the four questions were allocated a score of “1,” implying that they achieved adequacy in this indicator. Second, to measure autonomy in income, respondents were asked if they were involved in any income-generating activities independently. Those involved in such activities were then asked if they took part in making decisions on how the income was to be used, either individually or jointly with spouses or other household members. Respondents who were involved in such activities, and who solely or jointly participated in making decisions regarding use of the income, were considered to have achieved ade- quacy in this indicator. Intrahousehold relationships: Out of the 1653 respondents, 18% had achieved adequacy in intrahousehold relationships (see Table 2). More educated and older women had higher intrahousehold relationship adequacy scores compared to less educated and younger women (see Table 3). Fig. 3 Percentage distribution of individual respondents characteristics Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 2 D es cr ip tiv e st at ist ic s o n em po w er m en t i nd ic at or s Em po w er m en t d om ai ns a nd in di ca to rs Pe rc en ta ge Fr eq ue nc y 1. In tr in sic a ge nc y a. A ut on om y in in co m e W om en in di vi du al ly in vo lv ed in in co m e- ge ne ra tin g ac tiv iti es . 74 % 12 23 R an ge o f i nc om e ea rn ed (B D T) B el ow 2 00 0 (U SD 1 8. 54 ) 82 % 10 08 20 01 (U SD 1 8. 5) to 3 00 0 (U SD 2 7. 80 ) 12 % 14 9 30 01 (U SD 2 7. 81 ) t o 40 00 (U SD 3 7. 07 ) 3% 33 40 01 (U SD 3 7. 08 ) t o 50 00 (U SD 4 6. 34 ) 3% 33 A bo ve 5 00 0 W om en in vo lv ed in in co m e- ge ne ra tin g ac tiv iti es a nd : de ci de d ho w th e in co m e w as u se d, so le ly . 3% 43 de ci de d ho w th e in co m e w as u se d, jo in tly w ith h us ba nd s. 61 % 88 6 di d no t p ar tic ip at e in d ec id in g us e of in co m e. 12 % 17 4 a. In tr ah ou se ho ld r el at io ns hi ps Pe rc en ta ge o f w om en w ho h ad e ith er m ed iu m o r h ig h ex te nt re sp on se s o n ex te nt to w hi ch : Th ey fe el th ei r s po us e re sp ec ts th em . 98 % 16 19 Th ey fe el a du lts in y ou r h ou se ho ld (i n- la w s o r o th er s) re sp ec ts th em . 99 % 16 36 Th ey b el ie ve th ei r s po us e do es th in gs th at a re in re sp on de nt ’s b es t i nt er es t. 85 % 14 05 Th ey fe el c om fo rta bl e te lli ng th ei r s po us es w he n th ey d is ag re e w ith th em . 88 % 14 53 2. In st ru m en ta l a ge nc y a. A cc es s t o an d co nt ro l o ve r pr od uc tiv e ca pi ta l H ou se ho ld s o w ne d la nd a nd p on d 10 0% 16 53 O w ne rs hi p of la nd a nd p on d La nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts so le ly u nd er h us ba nd 68 % 11 24 La nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er h us ba nd a nd fa th er -in -la w 17 % 28 1 Po nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts so le ly u nd er h us ba nd 59 % 97 5 Po nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er a nd fa th er -in -la w 19 % 31 4 Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 2 (c on tin ue d) Em po w er m en t d om ai ns a nd in di ca to rs Pe rc en ta ge Fr eq ue nc y La nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er h us ba nd a nd w ife jo in tly 12 % 19 8 Po nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er h us ba nd a nd w ife jo in tly 12 % 19 8 La nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er o th er p eo pl e in fa m ily 2% 33 Po nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er o th er p eo pl e in fa m ily 9% 14 9 La nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er w om an a nd o th er p eo pl e in fa m ily 1% 16 Po nd o w ne rs hi p do cu m en ts u nd er w om an a nd o th er p eo pl e in fa m ily 3% 50 b. In pu t i n pr od uc tiv e an d in co m e de ci sio ns W om en w ho p ar tic ip at ed in a t l ea st on e aq ua cu ltu re a ct iv ity 98 % 16 19 D ec is io n- m ak in g in a qu ac ul tu re -r el at ed a ct iv iti es : Fi sh sp ec ie s s el ec tio n de ci si on s 82 % 13 55 B ra nd a nd ty pe o f a qu ac ul tu re in pu ts 86 % 14 21 Fi sh h ar ve sti ng re la te d de ci si on s ( w he n to h ar ve st) 82 % 13 55 N um be r o f fi sh to b e ha rv es te d. 88 % 14 53 N um be r o f fi sh to b e so ld . 81 % 13 39 c.  C on tr ol o ve r in co m e W om en w ho p ar tic ip at ed in m on ey sa vi ng d ec is io ns . 90 % 14 88 W om en w ho p ar tic ip at ed in fi na nc ia l d ec is io ns . 80 % 13 22 W om en p ar tic ip at ed in ro ut in e ho us eh ol d pu rc ha se s d ec is io ns . 93 % 15 37 d. F in an ci al e m po w er m en t Re sp on de nt s h ou se ho ld ta ke n an y lo an s o r b or ro w ed c as h/ in -k in d fro m a ny so ur ce in th e pa st 12 m on th s 48 % 22 % Re sp on de nt s h as a n ac co un t a t a ny b an k or o th er fo rm al in sti tu tio ns (e .g . p os t o ffi ce ) 8% 92 % If y es , p le as e m en tio n ab ou t t he o w ne rs hi p st at us o f t he a cc ou nt 8% 92 % Re sp on de nt s h as a n ac co un t t o di gi ta l fi na nc ia l s er vi ce s s uc h as B ka sh , R oc ke t 8% 92 % Pa rti ci pa te d N o pa rti ci pa tio n W om an p ar tic ip at ed in m ak in g de ci si on to ta ke th e lo an (s ) m os t o f t he ti m e 74 % 16 % W om an p ar tic ip at ed in d ec is io ns a bo ut w ha t t o do w ith th e m on ey b or ro w ed m os t o f t he ti m e 76 % 14 % W om an re sp on si bl e fo r r ep ay in g th e lo an 41 % 58 % Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 2 (c on tin ue d) Em po w er m en t d om ai ns a nd in di ca to rs Pe rc en ta ge Fr eq ue nc y W om an p ar tic ip at ed in m ak in g de ci si on s a bo ut u til iz in g th e di gi ta l a cc ou nt 97 % 3% e.  M ob ile p ho ne u se a nd o w ne rs hi p U se d m ob ile (s m ar t/n on -s m ar t) ph on es . 44 % 72 7 U se d sm ar t p ho ne s 4% 66 U se d ph on e on re qu es t ( us ed b or ro w ed p ho ne ) 5% 83      U se o f p ho ne s M ak in g ca lls 34 % 56 2 Se nd in g SM S 6% 99 A dv er tis in g an d m ar ke tin g 0% 0 In te rn et -b as ed u se s 1% 16 3. C ol le ct iv e ag en cy a. G ro up m em be rs hi p W om en w ith g ro up m em be rs hi p 46 % 76 0 M ot iv at io n of jo in in g th e gr ou p fo r w om en w ith g ro up m em be rs hi p En ha nc in g in co m e 40 % 30 4 O bt ai ni ng te ch ni ca l a ss ist an ce 19 % 14 4 H us ba nd ’s su gg es tio n 13 % 99 Pe er p re ss ur e 12 % 91 To b e pa rt of a n et w or k 7% 53 Po si tiv e re su lts fr om g ro up m em be rs hi p as re po rte d by th e w om en w ho w er e gr ou p m em be rs In cr ea se d te ch ni ca l k no w le dg e 39 % 29 6 Fi na nc ia l b en efi t 27 % 20 5 En ha nc ed so ci al st at us 22 % 16 7 Ex pa nd ed so ci al n et w or k 6% 46 Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 3 S ta tis tic al te sts o f r el at io ns hi p be tw ee n w om en ’s e m po w er m en t i nd ic at or s a nd w om en ’ m ar ita l s ta tu s, ag e an d ed uc at io n le ve l A ste ris ks * , * *, a nd * ** re pr es en t s ig ni fic an ce le ve l a t 1 0, 5 , a nd 1 % re sp ec tiv el y D om ai ns o f e m po w er m en t Em po w er m en t i nd ic at or G en de r c ha ra ct er ist ic s, t-s ta tic a nd si gn ifi ca nc e M ar ita l s ta tu s Si g. v al ue (s td . er ro r/ m s/ pr /r/ f ) A ge Si g. V al ue (s td .e rr or / m s/ r/f ) Ed uc at io n le ve l Si g. v al ue (s td .e rr or / m s/ r/f ) In tri ns ic a ge nc y In tr ah ou se ho ld r el at io ns hi p 1. 46 84 (0 .2 67 ) 4. 19 58 ** *  (0 .6 5) 12 .3 4* **   ( 0. 15 ) A ut on om y in in co m e In vo lv e in in de pe nd en t i nc om e- ge ne ra tin g ac tiv iti es 0. 09 18   ( 0. 76 2) − 1. 64 38  (0 .5 78 ) 17 .7 5* **  (0 .3 5) Pa rti ci pa tio n in d ec is io n to sp en d in de pe nd en tly e ar ne d in co m e 0. 59 08 (0 .4 43 ) 3. 11 8* * (0 .9 3) 5. 02 47 (3 .9 8) In str um en ta l a ge nc y In pu t i n pr od uc tiv e ac tiv iti es a nd d ec isi on s N um be r o f a qu ac ul tu re -r el at ed a ct iv iti es th at w om an p ar tic ip at ed in 2. 18 58 * (0 .1 2) − 0. 06 85 ** (0 .0 3) 1. 94 (7 .2 ) Pa rti ci pa tio n in d ec is io n- m ak in g on p ro du ct iv e ac tiv iti es 0. 31 2 (0 .6 7) − 0. 20 66 (3 .5 4) 5. 46 27 (5 .2 1) C on tr ol o ve r us e of in co m e 1. 83 61 (1 .4 0) 1. 17 81 (2 .8 1) 0. 41 (8 .2 2) A cc es s t o fin an ci al se rv ic es O w ne rs hi p of fi na nc ia l a cc ou nt 0. 85 31 (0 .3 56 ) 3. 65 9* ** (0 .7 5) 46 .1 ** * (0 . 0 0) C on tro l o f fi na nc ia l a cc ou nt 0. 76 9 (0 .0 9) − 0. 03 19 (0 .9 7) 0. 77 (3 .2 6) A cc es s t o an d co nt ro l o ve r pr od uc tiv e ca pi ta l O w ne rs hi p of p ro du ct iv e re so ur ce s − 7. 80 9* **   (0 .0 05 ) 0. 47 21   (0 .9 ) 4. 14 **   (0 .0 1) C ol le ct iv e ag en cy G ro up m em be rs hi p G ro up m em be rs hi p 3. 96 1 (0 .1 51 ) − 0. 24 04 (0 .5 11 ) 13 .0 1* * (0 .8 15 ) G en de r a tti tu de s G en de r a tti tu de 0. 71 6 (0 .0 87 ) − 0. 10 89 ** * (1 ) 2. 59 03 (1 0. 01 ) Aquaculture International 1 3 Autonomy in income: Nearly three-quarters (74%) of the women were independently involved in income-generating activities. These were mainly farm-based (Table  2). The most common activities were livestock and poultry rearing, practiced by 53% and 50% respectively. Entrepreneurship and aquaculture for autonomous income generation were rare. The majority (61%) of the women earned below BTD 2000 (USD 18.41) per month, while 9% earned up to BDT 3000 (USD 27.2) and and 2% earned up to BDT 4000 (USD 36.82), respectively. Only 2% earned BDT 5000 (USD 46.03) or more, while 26% did not engage in any activity (Table 2). Women with higher education levels participated more in independent income-earning activities compared to their non-formally educated coun- terparts (see Table 3). Most (88%) of the women who individually participated in income- generating activities also participated in making decisions on use of this income. About 12% (143) of the respondents were involved in independent income-generating activities but did not participate in decisions on how to use the income. Instead, these decisions were made by their male spouses (in the case of 90% of women in this category). For a further 10%, their male spouse and father-in-law took the decision together. Test results showed that it was more common for older women in this small band (12% of all respondents) to participate in decisions on use of independently earned income than it was for younger women (see Table 3). 3.2.2 Instrumental agency Instrumental Agency (or power to) “is strategic action to achieve one’s self-defined goals” (Yount et al. 2019). For this form of agency, input in productive decision-making, women’s involvement in aquaculture activities and gendered distribution and compensation of labor, control over use of income, access to financial services, and access to and control over pro- ductive capital were used as indicators. In assessing women’s input in productive decision-making, respondents were first asked about their participation in various aquaculture-related activities (Table  2) followed by their participation in making decisions on each activity that they took part in aquaculture- related activities including dike excavation, pond preparation, preparation and collection of organic manure, buying of inputs such as feed, fertilizer, and insecticide, buying of finger- lings, stocking of fingerlings, application of fertilizer, feed preparation, feeding, use of lime and other chemicals, disease checking, water quality management, harvesting of finger- lings/fish, selling of fingerlings/fish, marketing of fingerling/fish, marketing, dike cropping and supervision of labor work. They were then asked if they took part in making decisions (Table 2) and the extent of their decision-making (Table 4) regarding fish species selection, brand and type of input, fish time, and quantity of fish to be harvested and sold. Respond- ents who participated in making the listed decision, either solely or jointly with other peo- ple, were considered to have participated in decision-making. Results were presented in descriptive statistics (percentages) (Tables 2 and 4), and test of correlation was conducted in the number of activities that women participated by age, marital status, and the distance of the pond from homestead. The assessment of women’s involvement in aquaculture activities, and gendered dis- tribution and compensation of labor component, was added in this study to show the participation and engagement of women and men in the aquaculture sector. Participa- tion of men and women in various aquaculture-related tasks through family or hired labor was assessed. In addition to participation, the difference in wage compensation Aquaculture International 1 3 received was used as a proxy to establish whether there was gender inequality in these aspects of aquaculture. In this indicator, descriptive statistics (mean values) were used to analyze data (Table 4). In assessing women’s control over income use, respondents were asked about their involvement in making decisions regarding saving money, investing in income-gener- ating activities, and routine household purchases of basic items such as food for daily consumption or other household needs, where the household made such decisions. Respondents who had participated in making the decisions either solely or jointly with other people were considered to have achieved adequacy in this indictor. Table 4 Gendered distribution of hired and family aquaculture labor Labor type Family labor (workdays) Hired (workdays) Hired (pay) Male family labor Female family labor Male hired labor Female hired labor Female labor USD/day Male labor USD/day Dike cropping Mean 8.56 6.17 3.48 – – 4.6315 N 210 165 73 – – 73 Guarding Mean 109.04 8 118 – – 2.25 N 24 4 6 – – 6 Harvesting Mean 4.92 2.18 5.33 3.67 2.7667 3.2879 N 1438 798 780 3 3 780 Marketing Mean 3.78 1.45 2.99 5 1.90 2.3874 N 817 124 261 3 3 261 Pond preparation Mean 3.83 1.4 8.66 26.36 4.2272 4.6194 N 244 71 93 11 11 93 Post-stocking management Mean 31.95 14.37 9.13 1.5 3.55 4.675 N 1163 787 16 2 2 16 Pre stocking management (e.g. liming, fertilization) Mean 3.98 1.39 2.55 2.2 3.34 4.4632 N 801 241 38 5 5 38 Stocking management Mean 6.4 2.17 2.71 2.5 4.10 4.5143 N 1090 441 14 2 2 14 Others Mean 5.3 1.37 N 102 98 Total Mean 38.3 9.55 4.22 0.22 4.02 5.13 N 1653 1653 1653 1653 23 832 Aquaculture International 1 3 In this indicator, women were asked if their households had used credit either in cash or kind, in the past one year, and they had participated in deciding to take loan and how the loans were to be used. The respondents were also asked if they owned a financial account, whether a digital one such as Bkash or at any financial institution such as Postbank. Those who had a financial account were then about their involvement in making decisions about utilizing the account and ownership of the account (Table 2). Respondents whose house- holds had accessed loans and participated in making at least one decision about loans, were considered to have an account and had ownership or control, were considered to have achieved adequacy in this indicator. To evaluate women’s empowerment in access to and control over productive capital an indicator was generated based on owning a pond or land. Respondents were first asked if their households owned land or a fishpond. They were then asked whose name appeared on the ownership document (e.g., land title deed). Women whose households had at least one of the two assets and had their names in the ownership documents, either solely or jointly with other people, were considered to have achieved adequacy in this indicator. We found that women and men both contributed to family labor in aquaculture. While all surveyed households used labor from male family members in all aquaculture activities, 75% of them used female family labor (Table 4). Across all the activities, female family workdays were lower than male family workdays. For example, the 798 households that utilized female family labor in harvesting recorded an average of 2.18 days, compared to the 1438 that used male labor (an average of 4.92 days). Women’s participation in fish farming was mostly in feed preparation (72%), feeding (66%) and guarding the pond (47%). About 13% of the female respondents were involved in pond preparation; preparation of organic manure; buying of inputs and fingerlings; stocking of fingerlings; application of fertilizer, chemicals, and lime; dike cropping; and supervision of labor. Around 10% of the women participated in water quality management, pond excavation, disease checking, and selling and marketing of fish and fingerlings. Over- all, majority (82%) of the women participated in at least three aquaculture activities. Age and marital status had a significant relationship with the number of activities that women participated in. The distance of the fishpond from the homestead was significantly correlated with the number of activities that women were involved in (0.0073 p-value, −0.0665 coeff.). In households where fishponds were nearer to the homesteads, women were involved in more aquaculture activities. The average distance of fishponds from the homestead was 0.21 km, with the farthest being 4 km away. While 1% of the households hired female labor, 50% hired male labor. Hired female labor was low across all the activi- ties (Table  3). Notably, female hired labor was not used in dike cropping and guarding, despite woman participating in guarding activities through family labor. A significant dif- ference in compensation for hired labor between men and women was noted across all aquaculture activities. Participation in making aquaculture‑related decisions: Respondents were asked whether they participated in decisions on species selection, brand and type of inputs, fish and fingerling harvesting time, number of fish and fingerlings to be harvested, and the quantity of fish to be sold. Over 80% of the respondents participated in making these decisions (Table 2). A follow-up question was posed, to determine to what extent women participated in decision-making in each of the activities. The responses for involvement were all, some, few, or none of the decisions. As indicated in Table 5, the majority of the respondents were scarcely involved in decision-making under each activity. Aquaculture International 1 3 Control over use of income: The majority of the women participated in making income use decisions (Table  2), and 77% had achieved adequacy in this indicator. Over 76% of the women who participated in making the three decisions did so jointly with their hus- bands, while 5–16% of women reported that income use decisions were made solely by their spouses. Access to financial services: Results indicate that 4% of the respondents had adequacy in this indicator. Less than half (48%) of the households had used credit either in cash or kind in the past one year. Among the households that had access to credit, 74% of the women had participated in loan taking decisions. In majority of the households (69%), the decision to take and use loans was made jointly by the women and the spouse or together with other household members. In most cases (76%), women participated in making decisions about how to use the loan, though in 52% of the households that had taken loans, the respondents reported that their spouses were in charge of paying the loans. Women’s access to a digital or an institution-based financial account was very low. The digital financial account example refers to Bkash, Rocket, while an example of institution- based account is any bank such as Postbank. In total, 218 respondents had either a digital or an institutional financial account. About 80% of the women respondents did not have access to any account. Of the 134 (8%) who had digital financial accounts, only 4% had access to a smart phone. The respondent’s age and level of education had a statistically significant association with account ownership. Younger and more educated women were more likely to have financial accounts compared to older and less educated women. In terms of ownership status and control of financial accounts, about 80% of the 134 women had sole ownership of their financial accounts. Decisions on use of the financial accounts was mainly (59%) made jointly by the woman and her husband (Table 2). Access to and control over productive capital: Findings indicate that all households owned both land and fishponds. About two-thirds (66%) of the women participated in making decisions on what to plant in the household’s land. Ownership documents for the productive capital were mainly under the husband’s name as indicated (Table 2). Overall, 9% (145) of the women achieved adequacy in access and control on this productive asset. The relationship between marital status and adequacy in property ownership was strongly Table 5 Extent of involvement in decision-making in aquaculture production activities Activity Responses in percentages (count/numbers) All decisions Most decisions Some decision Few decisions No input in decisions Fish species selection 1 (21) 10 (169) 25 (414) 55 (913) 8 (136) Brand and type of input 9 (153) 10 (170) 25 (413) 49 (804) 7 (113) Time of harvesting fish 4 (64) 7 (115) 26 (431) 53 (883) 10 (160) Amount of fish to be harvested 10 (155) 12 (197) 33 (537) 41 (681) 5 (83) Amount of fish to be sold 7 (108) 7 (111) 27 (439) 50 (827) 10 (168) Aquaculture International 1 3 significant. Unmarried women scored higher than married women. Similarly, more edu- cated wome had higher chances of owning productive resources compared to their less educated counterparts. Access to use of mobile phones: This indicator, though not part of the pro-WEFI, was included for the purpose of this study to add another nuance of the women’s empowerment. In terms of mobile phone use and ownership, it was clear that information communication technology (ICT) penetration among women in the study area was very low. Only 33% of the respondents owned mobile phones, and 88% of them used a non-smart phone. For those who use phones, 35% of the respondents used phones mainly for making calls. 3.2.3 Collective agency Collective agency (power with) is defined as “joint action to achieve shared goals” (Yount et al. 2019). Group membership: To assess collective agency, group membership was used as an indi- cator (Table 2). Women who had membership in groups were considered to have achieved adequacy in this indicator. Aalmost half the women were members of at least one group, implying that they were adequate in this indicator (Table  2). Approximately 5% of the respondents were in group leadership positions. Group membership had a significant asso- ciation with education level, with more educated women having a higher chance of being members of a group. The most common groups were microcredit (35%), all-women fish farming groups (7%), and mixed-gender farming groups (6%). None of the respondents belonged to a marketing group. The main motivation for joining groups was enhancing income, while the most common positive results from being group members as reported by the women was increased technical knowledge. Gender attitudes: Gender attitudes were also assessed. To understand the social norms and beliefs that women held, twelve statements based on 5-point Likert scale responses were used to capture respondents’ level of agreement with statements on gender attitudes in aquaculture-related activities. For every positive gender (-equitable) attitude, we allo- cated a score of “1” and for a non-equitable attitude a score of “0.” For instance, in the statement “women should not get involved in fishing or aquaculture; this is a man’s respon- sibility”, the responses “disagree” and strongly disagree” were allocated the score “1,” while “strongly agree,” “agree,” and “neither agree nor disagree” were allocated the score “0.” We set the adequacy cutoff as 10 positive scores out of the total of 12 statements. Results indicate that about 22% of the 1653 women achieved adequacy in gender atti- tudes. The average gender attitude score was 6 out of 12. In most of the gender attitude statements, about half of the women had positive gender attitudes. Between 50% and 58% of them felt that they, just like men, should be involved in aquaculture and fishing, includ- ing activities related to purchasing of inputs and farmer group membership. Approximately 54% of the respondents believed that both genders can earn income from fish trading, can manage a fishpond, and that it is not primarily the man’s responsibility to control income obtained from fish trading. However, more than half the women felt that it was not appro- priate for them to get involved in activities such as transporting fish to the market for sale, or to use of boats and nets for harvesting fish. Furthermore, 66% of them were of the Aquaculture International 1 3 Ta bl e 6 A ss es sm en ts o f g en de r a tti tu de st at em en ts b y th e re sp on de nt s G en de r a tti tu de st at em en ts St ro ng ly a gr ee Pe rc en ta ge s an d (f re qu en - ci es ) A gr ee Pe rc en ta ge s an d (f re qu en - ci es ) N ei th er a gr ee no r d is ag re e Pe rc en ta ge s an d (f re qu en - ci es ) D is ag re e Pe rc en ta ge s an d (f re qu en - ci es ) St ro ng ly di sa gr ee Pe rc en ta ge s an d (f re qu en - ci es ) W om en sh ou ld n ot g et in vo lv ed in fi sh in g or a qu ac ul tu re ; t hi s i s a m an ’s re sp on si bi lit y 2% (3 3) 29 % (4 79 ) 11 % (1 82 ) 53 % (8 76 ) 5% (8 3) W om en sh ou ld n ot u se fi sh in g ne ts , b oa ts a nd o th er m ea ns to h ar ve st fis h 4% (6 6) 52 % (8 59 ) 10 % (1 65 ) 31 % (5 12 ) 3% (5 0) M en sh ou ld n ot c le an , p ro ce ss o r c oo k fis h be ca us e th at w or k sh ou ld b e do ne b y w om en 6% (9 9) 55 % (9 09 ) 11 % (1 82 ) 25 % (4 13 ) 3% (5 0) O nl y m en sh ou ld b e ab le to e ar n in co m e fro m tr ad in g an d m ar ke tin g of fi sh 2% (3 3) 37 % (6 11 ) 10 % (1 65 ) 40 % (6 61 ) 10 % (1 65 ) It is n ot a pp ro pr ia te fo r w om en to tr an sp or t fi sh to m ar ke t f or sa le – o nl y m en sh ou ld d o th at w or k 6% (9 9) 48 % (7 93 ) 12 % (1 98 ) 31 % (5 12 ) 3% (5 0) M en sh ou ld p rim ar ily b e th e on es w ho c on tro l t he e ar ni ng s o bt ai ne d fro m th e sa le o f fi sh 2% (3 3) 27 % (4 46 ) 12 % (1 98 ) 54 % (8 93 ) 6% (9 9) M en sh ou ld d ec id e on w ha t fi sh sh ou ld b e br ou gh t f ro m th e m ar ke t f or c on su m pt io n 2% (3 3) 34 % (5 62 ) 10 % (1 65 ) 43 % (7 10 ) 11 % (1 82 ) M en sh ou ld m os tly b e th e on es w ho b el on g to fi sh fa rm er g ro up s, or ga ni za tio ns , c oo pe ra - tiv es o r a ss oc ia tio ns , n ot w om en 2% (3 3) 28 % (4 63 ) 11 % (1 82 ) 56 % (9 26 ) 3% (5 0) M en sh ou ld m ak e th e de ci si on s a bo ut b uy in g in pu ts , s el ec tin g fe ed , a nd h ow th e po nd is m an ag ed 3% (5 0) 41 % (6 78 ) 12 % (1 98 ) 41 % (6 78 ) 3% (5 0) O nl y a m an c an su cc es sf ul ly m an ag e an d op er at e a fis hp on d. 2% (3 3) 30 % (4 96 ) 12 % (1 98 ) 46 % (7 60 ) 11 % (1 82 ) Tr yi ng n ew id ea s i n fis h fa rm in g is fo r m en , n ot w om en 2% (3 3) 39 % (6 45 ) 14 % (2 31 ) 41 % (6 78 ) 4% (6 6) Th e fa m ily b en efi ts w he n m en p ar tic ip at e in a qu ac ul tu re tr ai ni ng 1% (1 6) 3% (5 0) 11 % (1 82 ) 70 % (1 15 7) 16 % (2 64 ) Aquaculture International 1 3 opinion that cleaning and cooking fish is the work of women and not men. More details on gender attitudes are in provided in Table 6. The correlation between age and gender atti- tudes was significant and negative. Older women were more likely to have negative gender attitudes as compared to younger women. 4. Discussion 4.1 Intrinsic agency Intrahousehold relationships The intrahousehold relationship indicator provides a pic- ture on household harmony (Malapit et al. 2019). The results suggest that household har- mony was low, given that only 18% of the women had adequacy for this indicator. Women were least empowered in communicating their disagreement with a particular decision with their spouses. This is the case even though they were not confident that their spouses acted in their (women’s) best interests. This is important because harmonious intrahousehold relationships, and overall strong social cohesion between women and their husbands and other family members, can contribute to other types of empowerment by enabling a woman to do more, including earning income and attending group meetings (Malapit et al. 2019; Meinzen-Dick et al. 2019). Autonomy in income: Even though the intrahousehold harmony data suggest that in most households’ women did not consider themselves to be in a good position to voice their opinions and/or disagreements, the data on autonomy in income show that in most cases, women had high levels of autonomy in income (74%), meaning they were independently involved in income-generating activities. This shows that lack of harmonious relationships per se did not jeopardize the chances for women to exercise their agency to act and be involved in income-generating activity. Participation in independent income-generating activities provides a good foundation—though it is not the only foundation—for empower- ment (Kabeer 1999). Independent income generation is associated with an improvement in women’s status and strengthened women’s decision-making power (Scarborough et al. 2017; Haque et al. 2020; Shirajee 2013; Meinzen-Dick et al. 2019). In this particular case, women were primarilv involved in poultry and small-livestock rearing. These activities are easily managed at homestead level and indeed can be conceptualized as part of women’s reproductive—as much as productive—role because they involve a strong element of care (Anderson and Eswaran 2009; Ahmed and Sen 2018; Quisumbing et al. 2014). This iden- tification appears to be particularly important in rural Bangladesh due to restrictions on women’s mobility (Barman 2001; Jahan et al. 2015; Anderson and Eswaran 2009; Kabir 2013). Such restrictions are associated with maintaining women’s standing in a community (Kabeer 1999) whereas lack of conformity can attract detrimental repercussions such as gossip and loss of respect for the husband (Haque et al. 2020). The mobility of many Mus- lim women in Bangladesh is constricted by patriarchy and purdah1 (Mahmud et al. 2012; Shohel et al. 2022). This can have the effect of limiting women’s opportunities to improve their livelihoods and expand their social networks (Parveen and Leonhäuser 2005). 1 Seclusion of women from public observation by means of concealing clothing (including the veil). Aquaculture International 1 3 The percentage (61%) of women who participated in decision-making on the use of their independently earned income points to a high level of adequacy in this indicator, among the respondents in the study area. Like our findings, other studies have report fairly high joint decision-making in Bangladesh (Me-Nsope and Larkins 2016; Meinzen-Dick et  al. 2019; Kabir 2013). Joint decision-making by women and their husbands can provide a good basis for gender-accommodative and potential gender-transformative initiatives (Haque et  al. 2020). Our results additionally corroborate other studies which report that older women and those from single households experience higher participation in income decision-making (Anderson and Eswaran 2009; Kabir 2013; Zaman and Rahman 1999). A small percentage (12%) of women participated in income-earning activities but were not involved in deciding how income generated from these activities was used. Women may leave decision-making to their spouses and other family members as a sign of respect, or to preserve household harmony. In some cases, they have no desire to make decision solely (Kruijssen et al. 2021). 4.2 Instrumental agency Input in productive activities and income decisions Women’s empowerment in aqua- culture requires that they not only participate in aquaculture activities, but this participa- tion should also extend to making related productive decisions (FAO 2017; Ishita 2019). First, our study shows women’s involvement in aquaculture was limited. Gender norms influence the type of activities that women can participate in (Kruijssen et al. 2021). They mainly participated in feed preparation, feeding, and guarding, in that order, and are rarely involved in fish marketing (beyond the farm gate) as would require changes in social norms that limit women’s mobility (Smith and Bhattacharyya 2016; Seymour and Peterman 2018). This conforms with other studies conducted in Bangladesh which report feeding and feed preparation as the major aquaculture activities in which women in Bangladesh are involved (Kruijssen et al. 2021; Haque et al. 2020; Shelly and Costa 2002; Brugere et al. 2001). Second, our study shows that the majority of respondents participated in making aquacul- ture-related decisions. Some of these decisions include the selection of fish species for fish farming, selecting the brand and type of input to be used in fish farming, when to harvest fish, the quantity of fish to be sold etc. (Table  2). The most common form of decision- making in aquaculture activities were women jointly with other people in the family. This was different from the pattern observed in making other household decisions where the woman and her husband were the main decision-makers. Sole decision-making by women was rare. Involvement of other family members in aquaculture decisions may be due to the technical nature of fish farming requiring the involvement of other family members for technical advice, or because the pond is considered as an extended family asset. Women’s participation in the number of fish to sell or to retain for household consump- tion is important. In Bangladesh, women are typically responsible for securing the family’s nutritional status (Smith and Bhattacharyya 2016). Gendered distribution and compensation, and family and hired labor: Across all aqua- culture activities, family labor provided by women was significantly less than the aver- age workdays provided by men, indicating the dominance of men in aquaculture-related tasks in the study area. Women’s activities in aquaculture are often regarded as supportive Aquaculture International 1 3 of their husband’s input (Kruijssen et  al. 2021; Haque et  al. 2020; Brugere et  al. 2001). As noted above, women’s tasks are primarily associated with feed preparation and feed- ing. Nevertheless, unmarried and less educated women in the study area were involved in significantly more activities. This indicates a degree of flexibility in gender norms (Meinzen-Dick et al. 2019). In households where ponds were located far from the home- steads, women participated in significantly fewer aquaculture activities, which is in line with other findings on women’s participation in aquaculture (Kruijssen et al. 2021; Brugere et al. 2001). Hired female labor was low in all the activities. In a study across 16 districts in Bangla- desh, Jahan et al. (2015) reported that female family and hired labor employed in gher2 fish farming technologies was very low compared to male labor. Similar findings were reported by de Brauw et al. (2021) in jute value chains in Bangladesh’s delta region. Possible expla- nations for limited female family labor in aquaculture could include time constraints due to domestic work, restriction in mobility, religious and cultural norms, and male insecurities (Haque et al. 2020; Balk 1997). Undervaluation of women’s contribution in aquaculture is further demonstrated by the significantly lower wages for the same activities. Kruijssen et al. (2016) noted that aquacul- ture benefits in Bangladesh are not equitably distributed between men and women. Simi- larly, while assessing the barriers and opportunities in agriculture and aquaculture, Haque et al. (2020) reported that women in northern Bangladesh are paid lower wages than men. As further reported by Haque et al. (2020), women are perceived as weak and incapable of working as fast as men, which may partly explain their lower wages. Women may accept low wages due to lack of high-waged alternatives, market supply and demand dynamics (Jahan et al. 2015), and entrenched social norms that attach low value to female labor (de Brauw et al. 2021). Discrimination in hiring and compensating women in aquaculture labor not only compromises their livelihood opportunities but also reduces household income and general well-being (Siddiqua et al. 2021). As noted by Kabeer et al. (2011), partici- pation in paid work enhances women’s power in household decision-making. However, when women are focused into just a few aquaculture activities, this hinders their visibility in aquaculture, hence continued undervaluation of their labor, and under-estimation of their ability. Control over use of income: More than 80% of the respondents participated in making decisions on the use of household income. These decisions were mainly made jointly by the women and their husbands. Women’s involvement in routine household purchases was higher than all other decisions. Access to financial services: Aquaculture requires substantial operating capital necessi- tating access to credit. In the study area, less than half of the households had access to credit. Although a sense of companionship was observed in joint credit-related decision- making, results pointed towards a low adequacy. Access to financial services was very low for women, with over 90% having no access. This was significantly lower among younger women and those who had low levels of formal education. These findings corroborate 2 The term gher refers to a paddy field which has been modified for shrimp or prawn production. Typi- cally, paddy is cultivated in the middle of the field, which is surrounded by canals with high wide dikes into which the shrimp and prawn are stocked. Aquaculture International 1 3 an Asian Development Bank report by Salman and Nowacka (2020) which noted that women in Bangladesh use insecure and unreliable means of saving money such as clay money saving boxes and buying excess stocks. In bid to improve women’s empowerment through financial services, The Government of Bangladesh and nongovernmental organi- zations have developed strategies and policies to improve women’s financial inclusion. These include the National Strategy for Social Security, the National Women Develop- ment Policy 2011, National Financial Inclusion Strategy (2021–2025) (Asian Development Bank 2022), and “The National Financial Inclusion Strategy” (WFID Partnership 2022). In addition, Bangladesh accounts for over 8% of the world’s mobile money accounts (Rabbani 2020). Despite these facts, data from our study area indicates very low access for women. The gender gap in mobile phone ownership is a significant challenge in women’s financial inclusion (Asian Development Bank  2022). According to Tiwari et  al. (2019), in Bang- ladesh, only 15% and 11% of the women have registered bank accounts and are mobile phone users, respectively. Access to information and extension services: The data suggest that women’s use of phones to obtain or inquire for information is low: only 29% make calls and 6% send mes- sages. Thus, any effort designed to reach the women with better knowledge, techniques and technology in aquaculture practice need to make use of multiple communication avenues including radio, mobile van in the villages, among others. There is an opportunity to strengthen inclusivity access to financial services and access to information through multi-sectorial efforts, including ensuring improved use of mobile phones to enhance access to digital financial accounts. This is especially critical with the efforts of the Bangladeshi Government to improve use of ICT in the country through ini- tiatives and policies such as “Digital Bangladesh|:Vision 2020” (Mazumdar and Alharah- sheh 2020). The development and growth of e-commerce in Bangladesh has been tremen- dous over the past two decades. Use of mobile phones and access to financial accounts provides an unexploited opportunity for women in fish farming household to increase their empowerment and participation in the sector through e-commerce (Sultana and Akter 2021). Literature shows that microfinances play a significant role in inclusive finan- cial access and improving women’s empowerment (Islam 2020) and Bangladesh, progress has been made by organizations such as The Grameen Bank of Bangladesh and BRAC (Ali 2021; Islam 2020; Pitt et al. 2006). Access to and control over productive capital In the study area, almost all the households owned land and ponds. Ownership of productive capital such as land is an indicator of a household’s well-being since these assets are used to generate income and counter shocks (Doss et al. 2014). Gender literature indicates lack of access to, and control over, produc- tive assets is one of the major limitations to empowering women (Meinzen-Dick et  al. 2011; Das et al. 2014). Nevertheless, findings from this study indicated that few women had ownership of these assets. Overall, only 9% had adequacy in access and control of ponds and land. This corroborates other studies which report that in Bangladesh, produc- tive assets such as land and ponds are mostly owned by men (Choudhury and McDougall 2018; Jahan et al. 2015; Sproule et al. 2016; Quisumbing and Kumar 2011). Our findings indicate that married women had significantly less adequacy on control over productive capital. According to Meinzen-Dick et al. (2011), women are considered co-owners of their husbands’ assets, but these rights only last as long as they remain married (Kabeer et al. Aquaculture International 1 3 2011), especially when ownership documents do not include their names. Even when mar- ried, women often do not have power to make decision over use of resources without their husbands’ permission (Choudhury and McDougall 2018). 4.3 Collective agency In the pro-WEFI analytic framework, notions of collective agency are indicated by family relationships and group membership. Group membership: This empowers women through access to inputs and credit, and through social capital and knowledge, among other benefits (Malapit et al. 2019). In addi- tion, group membership interacts with other factors such as financial empowerment and decision-making power, resulting in greater impact on overall empowerment (Gash and Odell 2013). Studies in different contexts across the world demonstrate the importance of collective agency to women’s empowerment (Vimala et al. 2010; Yamashita 2008; Kamal and Rao 2018; Sedai et  al. 2021; Gupta et  al. 2019; Malapit et  al. 2020; Mwambi et  al. 2021; Kabeer and Huq 2010). In the study area, almost half the respondents belonged to a group. Given that increasing income was the main reason for joining groups, it is not sur- prising that micro-credit groups were the most common. Interestingly, increased technical knowledge was the most common benefit. Gender attitudes: Attitudes to gender roles reflect social definitions of femininity and masculinity, and influence women’s and men’s aspirations and choices. Findings indicate a gap in women’s gender attitudes on aquaculture-related activities. Approximately 22% of women achieved adequacy. Although slightly more than half believed that aquaculture is not just a man’s domain, the majority of women also believed that women should not use fishing nets or transport fish, and that cleaning, cooking and processing fish is not a man’s job. Younger and more educated women had more equitable gender attitudes. Similar find- ings have been reported in other studies (Balk 1997). The equitable gender attitudes among the younger, educated women may have been as a result of influence from education and exposure to a modern outlook (Sayem and Nury 2013). Religious, social and cultural norms have a big role inhibiting women’s empowerment, participation, and engagement in aquaculture in Bangladesh (Sultana et  al.  2018). For instance, women are discriminated against in asset inheritance (Choudhury and McDougall 2018; Sproule et al. 2016; Kabeer 2011; Lecoutere et al. 2021) and are expected to access land and other productive assets through their male relatives. Practices like benami and naior which encourage women to relinquish their property ownership and control rights to their husbands and brothers, limit asset ownership by women (Quisumbing and Maluc- cio 2003). Efforts to provide solutions to technical constraints which challenge women’s empowerment, participation, and engagement in aquaculture, need to be accompanied with transformations in critical consciousness (Kantor et  al. 2015). Gender Accommodative Approaches (GAAs) are best accompanied by Gender Transformative Approaches (GTAs) to women’s empowerment (Cole et al. 2020). The current study complements existing liter- ature which shows a trend in improved joint decision-making between men and women in Bangladesh (Rahman et al. 2020; Quisumbing et al. 2021). This indicates promising pos- sibilities for GTAs which help to strengthen joint decision-making further. As highlighted Aquaculture International 1 3 by Kantor et al. (2015), effective GTA mechanisms include participatory action research methodologies and behavior change communication strategies. A self-reinforcing relationship frequently exists between women’s empowerment and economic development. As women take up more opportunities in aquaculture, increased productivity in this sector is observed (Aung et al. 2021; Kruijssen et al. 2018). This con- tributes to SDGs 1, 2, and 5. As noted by Aung et al. (2021), women’s empowerment in aquaculture also promotes the SDG 14 through increased production efficiency. The findings from this study illuminate a significant opportunity that can be explored to help achieve several sustainable development goals. 5. Conclusion Despite some women achieving adequacy in some indicators, most women in fish farming households in Bangladesh lack adequacy in many of the women’s empowerment indicators assessed. Gaps in adequacy are observed in crucial indicators such as financial empow- erment, and access to and control over productive capital. However, joint decision-mak- ing was across various activities was reported. Though technical and practical challenges constrain women’s participation and engagement in aquaculture, religious, gender, social norms pose as a big challenge. The authors recommend that aquaculture development pro- jects are target strengthening women’s participation, engagement, and benefit in and from all nodes of the aquaculture value chain, and that women be made visible and valued. In addition, gender-transformative approaches would mitigate the social, cultural, and gender norms that hinder women’s economic, social, and technical empowerment. Special atten- tion should be paid to working with factors such as age, education level and marital status to ensure the benefits of empowerment are experienced widely. Limitations of the study Among the limitations to note in this study is that due to budget constraints, we collected data on seven (7) indicators instead of twelve (12) as required by the pro-WEFI analytic framework. In addition, while in pro-WEFI a final gender parity index (GPI) is calcu- lated from data collected from both women and men from the same household, our study used women-only data, which therefore precluded generating a GPI for more information on WEFI and pro-WEFI (Cole et  al. 2020; Ragsdale et  al.  2022). We acknowledge that the indicators and patterns reported in this study only point to possible direction of (dis) empowerment and may not paint a conclusive picture of women’s empowerment. Never- theless, our study provides insights on some of the domains of women’s empowerment in fish farming. Acknowledgements This research has been carried out as part of the Aquaculture: Increasing Income, Diversifying Diets, and Empowering Women in Bangladesh and Nigeria (IDEA) project number INV009865. Financial support for this study was provided by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. In addi- tion, this work was also carried out under the CGIAR GENDER Impact Platform, which is grateful for the support of CGIAR Trust Fund contributors: www. cgiar. org/ funde rs. We also would like to thank the Resil- ient Aquatic Food Systems for Healthy People and Planet (RAqFS) One CGIAR research and development initiative for providing the platform to carry out this study. Furthermore, we would like to thank Dr. Sunil Siriwardena, Dr. Rohana Subasinghe, and Dr. Colin Shelley for providing leadership in the IDEA project. Furthermore, we thank Ms. Njeri Okono for her editorial assistance. http://www.cgiar.org/funders Aquaculture International 1 3 Author contribution Lucy Njogu: Data curation, Methodology, Formal analysis and Writing-original draft. Rahma Isaack Adam: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.Cathy Rozel Farnworth: Writing-addition of new ideas, writing and editing. Data availability Data is available upon request. Declarations Ethics approval This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Com- mons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. References Ahmed T, Sen B (2018) Conservative outlook, gender norms and female wellbeing: evidence from rural Bangladesh. World Dev 111:41–58. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2018. 06. 017 Ali KMB (2021) Impact of microcredit on women’s empowerment in Bangladesh: A case study on Ranga- mati Pourashaba, Bangladesh. Soc Chang 10(1):100–123. http:// www. socia lscie ncejo urnals. pjgs- ws. com/ index. php/ PJGS/ artic le/ view/ 183 Anderson S, Eswaran M (2009) What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. J Dev Econ 90(2):179–191. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jdeve co. 2008. 10. 004 Apu NA, Belton B, Dalsgaard JP, Kruijssen F, Meisner CA (2014) Farmed fish value chain development in Bangladesh: Situation analysis and trends. WorldFish/ILRI Project Report. Nairobi, Kenya: Inter- national Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), 1–121. https:// cgspa ce. cgiar. org/ bitst ream/ handle/ 10568/ 41726/ PR_ Bangl adesh_ Situa tionA nalys is_ web. pdf? seque nce=7. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Aregu L, Farnworth CR, Choudhury A, Rajaratnam S, McDougall C (2018) Gender and innovation pro- cesses in integrated fish agri-food systems in Bangladesh and the Philippines: Insights from the CGIAR Research Program FISH (FISH-Gennovate-Report). GENNOVATE Program Report on the CGIAR Research Program FISH. WorldFish, Penang Asian Development Bank (2022) Gender equality and social inclusion diagnostic for the finance sector of Bangladesh.  https:// www. adb. org/ sites/ defau lt/ files/ publi cation/ 849161/ gender- equal ity- social- inclu sion- finan ce- bangl adesh. pdf Aung YM, Khor LY, Tran N, Shikuku KM, Zeller M (2021) Technical efficiency of small-scale aquaculture in Myanmar: does women’s participation in decision-making matter? Aquac Rep 21:100841 Balk D (1997) Defying gender norms in rural Bangladesh: a social demographic analysis. Popul Stud 51(2):153–172. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 00324 72031 00014 9886 Barman BK (2001) Women in small-scale aquaculture in north-west Bangladesh. Gend Technol Dev 5(2):267–287. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 09718 524. 2001. 11909 997 Barooah B, Iversen V, Wendt A, Sengupta P, Martin A, Bravo C, Reza M (2022) Evaluation of IDEA pro- ject in Bangladesh. 3IE. https:// doi. org/ 10. 23846/ WP0053 Brugere C, McAndrew K, Bulcock P (2001) Does cage aquaculture address gender goals in development? Results of a case study in Bangladesh. Aquac Econ Manag 5(3–4):179–189. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 13657 30010 93802 86 Center or Research and Information (2019) Bangladesh: The role model in women’s empowerment. https:// cri. org. bd/ publi cation/ 2019/ April/ Women Empow erment/ Bangl adesh- The- Role- Model- in- Women% 27s- Empow erment. pdf Choudhury A, McDougall C (2018) Gendered ownership of aquaculture resources: insights from two vil- lages in Bangladesh. https:// doi. org/ 10. 13140/ RG.2. 2. 26917. 76008 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.017 http://www.socialsciencejournals.pjgs-ws.com/index.php/PJGS/article/view/183 http://www.socialsciencejournals.pjgs-ws.com/index.php/PJGS/article/view/183 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.10.004 https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/41726/PR_Bangladesh_SituationAnalysis_web.pdf?sequence=7 https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/41726/PR_Bangladesh_SituationAnalysis_web.pdf?sequence=7 https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/849161/gender-equality-social-inclusion-finance-bangladesh.pdf https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/849161/gender-equality-social-inclusion-finance-bangladesh.pdf https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000149886 https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2001.11909997 https://doi.org/10.23846/WP0053 https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300109380286 https://doi.org/10.1080/13657300109380286 https://cri.org.bd/publication/2019/April/WomenEmpowerment/Bangladesh-The-Role-Model-in-Women%27s-Empowerment.pdf https://cri.org.bd/publication/2019/April/WomenEmpowerment/Bangladesh-The-Role-Model-in-Women%27s-Empowerment.pdf https://cri.org.bd/publication/2019/April/WomenEmpowerment/Bangladesh-The-Role-Model-in-Women%27s-Empowerment.pdf https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26917.76008 Aquaculture International 1 3 Choudhury A, McDougall C, Rajaratnam S (2017) Women’s empowerment in aquaculture: Two case stud- ies from Bangladesh. FAO, Rome. https:// www. fao. org/3/ i7512e/ i7512e. pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Cole SM, Kaminski AM, McDougall C, Kefi AS, Marinda PA, Maliko M, Mtonga J (2020) Gender accom- modative versus transformative approaches: a comparative assessment within a post-harvest fish loss reduction intervention. Gend Technol Dev 24(1):48–65 Das N, Yasmin R, Ara J, Kamruzzaman M, Davis P, Behrman J, Roy S, Quisumbing AR (2014) How do intrahousehold dynamics change when assets are transferred to women? Evidence from BRACCs chal- lenging the frontiers of poverty reduction targeting the Ultra-poor Program in Bangladesh. SSRN Elec- tron J. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 24057 12 de Brauw A, Kramer B, Murphy M (2021) Migration, labor and women’s empowerment: evidence from an agricultural value chain in Bangladesh. World Dev 142:105445. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2021. 105445 Doss CR, Kim SM, Njuki J, Hillenbrand E, Miruka M (2014) Women’s individual and joint property own- ership: effects on household decisionmaking. SSRN Electron J. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 24839 68 Farnworth CR, Sultana N, Kantor P, Choudhury A (2015) Gender integration in aquaculture research and technology adoption processes: Lessons learned in Bangladesh. 1–36. http:// pubs. iclarm. net/ resou rce_ centre/ 2015- 17. pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2017) Women’s empowerment in aquacul- ture in Bangladesh and Indonesia: Insights from four case studies background: Women in Aquaculture in Bangladesh and Indonesia. In: FAO Brief. https:// www. fao. org/3/ i7113e/ i7113e. pdf.  Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Gash M, Odell K (2013) The evidence-based story of savings groups: a synthesis of seven randomized con- trol trials. September, 60. https:// seepn etwork. org/ files/ galle ries/ 1206_ FINAL_ Evide nce- Based_ Savin gs_ Web. pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Gupta S, Vemireddy V, Singh D, Pingali P (2019) Adapting the women’s empowerment in agriculture index to specific country context: insights and critiques from fieldwork in India. Global Food Secur 23(Sep- tember):245–255. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. gfs. 2019. 09. 002 Haque SF, Choudhury A, Adam R, McDougall C (2020) Rapid assessment on gender dynamics, barriers, opportunities and risks in aquaculture and agriculture sector in northwest Bangladesh. https:// digit alarc hive. world fishc enter. org/ handle/ 20. 500. 12348/ 4420. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Huq H, Islam S, Bahauddin K (2016) Does aquaculture sector concern about women empowerment with sustainable development? A situation analysis of coastal regions of Bangladesh. Concern%20 about%20Women%20Empowerment%20with%20Sustainable%20Development_A%20Situation%20 Analysis%20of%20Coastal%20Regions%20of%20Bangladesh.p. https:// susta inabl edeve lopme nt. un. org/ conte nt/ docum ents/ 10086 58_% 20Hug% 20et% 20al._ Does% 20Aqu acult ure% 20Sec tor% 20 Ishita IJ (2019) Sustainability of aquaculture and its impact on rural women of Bangladesh (Doctoral dis- sertation, North South University). Islam MS (2020) Role of Islamic microfinance in women’s empowerment: evidence from rural development scheme of Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited. ISRA Int J Islam Finance 13(1):26–45. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1108/ IJIF- 11- 2019- 0174 Islam MS, Jahan H, Al-amin AKMA (2016) Fisheries and aquaculture sectors in Bangladesh: an overview of the present status, challenges and future potential. J Fish Aquac Res 1(1):2–9 Jahan K, Belton B, Ali H, Dhar G, Ara I (2015) Aquaculture technologies in Bangladesh: An assessment of technical and economic performance and producer behavior. In: Working Papers (Vol. 52) Jui NZ, Rahman M (2018) Gender role in pond fish culture in terms of decision-making and nutrition secu- rity. Bangladesh J Agric Econ 38:55–71. https:// doi. org/ 10. 22004/ ag. econ. 279933 Kabeer N (1999) Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empower- ment. Dev Change 30(May):435–464 Kabeer N (2011) Between affiliation and autonomy: navigating pathways of women’s empowerment and gender justice in rural Bangladesh. Dev Change 42(2):499–528. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1467- 7660. 2011. 01703.x Kabeer N, Huq L (2010) The power of relationships: love and solidarity in a landless women’s organisation in rural Bangladesh. IDS Bull 41(2):79–87. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/j. 1759- 5436. 2010. 00126.x Kabeer N, Mahmud S, Tasneem S (2011) Does paid work provide a pathway to women’s empowerment? Empirical findings from Bangladesh. In: IDS Working Paper (Vol. 2011, Issue 375 https:// opend ocs. ids. ac. uk/ opend ocs/ handle/ 20. 500. 12413/ 4223. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Kabir SSM and A. K. M. S., Jahan (2013) Household decision-making process of rural women in Bangla- desh. IOSR J Humanit Social Sci 10(6):69–78. https:// doi. org/ 10. 9790/ 0837- 10669 78 Kamal G, Rao TU (2018) Self-help group: an effective approach in empowering marine fisher women folk. Asia Pac J Res ISSN 2347-4794, 165–170 https://www.fao.org/3/i7512e/i7512e.pdf https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405712 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105445 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105445 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2483968 http://pubs.iclarm.net/resource_centre/2015-17.pdf http://pubs.iclarm.net/resource_centre/2015-17.pdf https://www.fao.org/3/i7113e/i7113e.pdf https://seepnetwork.org/files/galleries/1206_FINAL_Evidence-Based_Savings_Web.pdf https://seepnetwork.org/files/galleries/1206_FINAL_Evidence-Based_Savings_Web.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2019.09.002 https://digitalarchive.worldfishcenter.org/handle/20.500.12348/4420 https://digitalarchive.worldfishcenter.org/handle/20.500.12348/4420 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1008658_%20Hug%20et%20al._Does%20Aquaculture%20Sector%20 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1008658_%20Hug%20et%20al._Does%20Aquaculture%20Sector%20 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-11-2019-0174 https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-11-2019-0174 https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.279933 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01703.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01703.x https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00126.x https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/4223 https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/4223 https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-1066978 Aquaculture International 1 3 Kantor PMM, Choudhury A (2015) Amplifying outcomes by addressing inequality: The role of gender- transformative approaches in agricultural research for development. Gend Technol Dev 19(3):292–319. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 09718 52415 596863 Karim MR, Mamun A, Rana ASM, Mahumud MM, Shoma RA, Dutt NN, Bharati D, P., Hossain MG (2021) Acute malnutrition and its determinants of preschool children in Bangladesh: gender differen- tiation. BMC Pediatr 21(1):1–10. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1186/ s12887- 021- 03033-z Kruijssen F, Rajaratnam S, Choudhury A, McDougall C, Dalsgaard JPT (2016) Gender in the farmed fish value chain of Bangladesh: A review of the evidence and development approaches. In: Program Brief (Vols. 2016-38., Issue February). https:// hdl. handle. net/ 10568/ 79175. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Kruijssen F, McDougall CL, van Asseldonk IJM (2018) Gender and aquaculture value chains: A review of key issues and implications for research. Aquaculture 493(September 2017):328–337. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. aquac ulture. 2017. 12. 038 Kruijssen F, Adam R, Choudhury A, Danielsen K, McDougall C, Newton J, Smits E, Shelley C (2021) A gendered aquaculture value chain analysis in northwestern Bangladesh. WorldFish. https:// www. kit. nl/ wp- conte nt/ uploa ds/ 2021/ 03/ Progr am- Report- 2021- 02- Web- 25Mar 21. pdf.  Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Lecoutere E, van den Berg M, de Brauw A (2021) Changes in women’s empowerment in the household, women’s diet diversity, and their relationship against the background of COVID-19 in southern Bangladesh. April, 83. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2499/ p1573 8coll2. 134380 Mahmud S, Shah NM, Becker S (2012) Measurement of women’s empowerment in rural Bangladesh. World Dev 40(3):610–619. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2011. 08. 003 Malapit HJ, Sproule K, Kovarik C, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A, Ramzan F, Hogue E, Alkire S (2014) Measuring progress toward empowerment: Women’s empowerment in agriculture index: Baseline report. IFPRI. http:// www. ifpri. org/ publi cation/ measu ring- progr ess- toward- empow erment? print. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Malapit H, Kovarik C, Sproule K, Meinzen-Dick R, Quisumbing A (2015) Instructional Guide on the Abbreviated Women’s Empowerment in Agriculture Index (A-WEAI) 1. October 2015, 1–68 Malapit H, Quisumbing A, Meinzen-Dick R, Seymour G, Martinez EM, Heckert J, Rubin D, Vaz A, Yount KM (2019) Development of the project-level women’s empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI). World Dev 122:675–692. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2019. 06. 018 Malapit H, Ragasa C, Martinez EM, Rubin D, Seymour G, Quisumbing A (2020) Empowerment in agri- cultural value chains: Mixed methods evidence from the Philippines. J Rural Stud 76 (September 2019):240–253. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jrurs tud. 2020. 04. 003 Mazumdar A, Alharahsheh HH (2020) Digital Bangladesh – vision 2021: What is the digital Bangladesh concept? S Asian Res J Eng Technol 2(01):6–9. https:// doi. org/ 10. 36346/ sarjet. 2020. v02i01. 00 Me-Nsope N, Larkins M (2016) Gender role in pond fish culture in terms of decision-making and nutri- tion security. J Gend Agric Food Secur 1(3):1–22 Meinzen-Dick R, Johnson N, Quisumbing A, Njuki J, Behrman J, Rubin D, Peterman A, Waithanji E (2011) Gender, assets, and agricultural development programs: A conceptual framework. CAPRi Working Paper Meinzen-Dick R, Rubin D, Elias M, Mulema AA, Myers E (2019) Women’ s empowerment in Agricul- ture: Lessons from qualitative research. IFPRI Discussion Paper 01797. Washington, D.C.: IFPRI. https:// hdl. handle. net/ 10568/ 99534 Murphy S, Arora D, Kruijssen F, McDougall C, Kantor P (2020) Gender-based market constraints to informal fish retailing: evidence from analysis of variance and linear regression. PLoS ONE 15(3):1–16. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1371/ journ al. pone. 02292 86 Mwambi M, Bijman J, Galie A (2021) The effect of membership in producer organizations on women’s empowerment: evidence from Kenya. Women’s Stud Int Forum 87(March):102492. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. wsif. 2021. 102492 Parveen S, Leonhäuser IU (2005) Empowerment of rural women in Bangladesh: A household level anal- ysis (Vol. 72). Berlin: Margraf Pitt MM, Khandker SR, Cartwright J (2006) Empowering women with micro finance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Econ Dev Cult Chang 54(4):791–831. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1086/ 503580 Quisumbing AR, Kumar N (2011) Does social capital build women’s assets? The long-term impacts of group-based and individual dissemination of agricultural technology in Bangladesh. J Dev Eff 3(2):220–242. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1080/ 19439 342. 2011. 570450 Quisumbing AR, Maluccio JA (2003) Resources at marriage and intrahousehold allocation: evidence from Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Indonesia, and South Africa. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 65(3):283–327. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ 1468- 0084. t01-1- 00052 https://doi.org/10.1177/0971852415596863 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-03033-z https://hdl.handle.net/10568/79175 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.038 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2017.12.038 https://www.kit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Program-Report-2021-02-Web-25Mar21.pdf https://www.kit.nl/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Program-Report-2021-02-Web-25Mar21.pdf https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134380 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.08.003 http://www.ifpri.org/publication/measuring-progress-toward-empowerment?print http://www.ifpri.org/publication/measuring-progress-toward-empowerment?print https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.06.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.04.003 https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjet.2020.v02i01.00 https://hdl.handle.net/10568/99534 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229286 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2021.102492 https://doi.org/10.1086/503580 https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2011.570450 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052 https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.t01-1-00052 Aquaculture International 1 3 Quisumbing AR, Roy S, Njuki J, Tanvin K, Waithanji E (2014) Can dairy value-chain projects change gender norms in rural Bangladesh? Impacts on assets, gender norms, and time use. SSRN Electron J. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 23732 64 Quisumbing A, Heckert J, Faas S, Ramani G, Raghunathan K, Malapit H, Heckert J, Eissler S, Faas S, Martinez E, Myers E, Pereira A, Quisumbing A, Ragasa C, Raghunathan K, Rubin D, Seymour G (2021a) Women’s empowerment and gender equality in agricultural value chains: evidence from four countries in Asia and Africa. Food Secur. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1007/ s12571- 021- 01193-5 Quisumbing A, Meinzen-Dick R, Malapit H (2021b) Women’s empowerment and gender equality in south Asian agriculture: measuring progress using the project-level women’s empowerment in Agriculture Index (pro-WEAI) in Bangladesh and India. World Dev 151:105396. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2021. 105396 Rabbani Z (2020) Mapping of digital service providers in Bangladesh for the aquaculture: Increasing income, diversifying diets, and empowering women in Bangladesh and Nigeria project. https:// digit alarc hive. world fishc enter. org/ handle/ 20. 500. 12348/ 4515. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Ragsdale K, Read-Wahidi M, Marinda P, Pincus L, Torell E, Kolbila R Adapting the WEAI to explore gen- der equity among fishers, Processors, and sellers at Zambia’s Lake Bangweulu. World Development, volume 152, 2022, 105821, ISSN 0305-750X. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2022. 105821 Rahman MH, Naoroze K (2007) Women empowerment through participation in aquaculture: experience of a large-scale technology demonstration project in Bangladesh. J Social Sci 3(4):164–171. https:// thesc ipub. com/ abstr act/ jssp. 2007. 164. 171 Salman A, Nowacka K (2020) Innovative financial products and services for women in Asia and the Pacific. 67. https:// www. adb. org/ sites/ defau lt/ files/ publi cation/ 576086/ sdwp- 67- finan cial- produ cts- servi ces- women- asia- pacifi c. pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Sayem AM, Nury ATMS (2013) An assessment of attitude towards equitable gender norms among muslim women in Bangladesh. Women’s Stud Int Forum 40:102–110. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. wsif. 2013. 04. 007 Scarborough WJ, Risman BJ, Meola C (2017) Women’s-group fishponds in Bangladesh. Socius: Sociol Res Dynamic World 3:237802311770041. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 23780 23117 700419 Sedai AK, Vasudevan R, Alves Pena A (2021) Friends and benefits? Endogenous rotating savings and credit associations as alternative for women’s empowerment in India. World Dev 145:105515. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2021. 105515 Seymour G, Peterman A (2018) Context and measurement: an analysis of the relationship between intra- household decision-making and autonomy. World Dev 111:97–112. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. world dev. 2018. 06. 027 Shamsuzzaman M, Mojibul M, Mozumder H, Jannat S, Faisal A, Bhyuian S (2020) The economic contri- bution of fish and fish trade in Bangladesh. Aquaculture Fisheries 5(4):174–181. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. aaf. 2020. 01. 001 Shelly AB, Costa MD (2002) Women in aquaculture: Initiatives of Caritas Bangladesh involving women in an aquaculture development program. Fisheries (Bethesda), Bbs 1999, 77–87 Shirajee S (2013) The changing face of women for small-scale aquaculture development in rural Bangla- desh. Sustainable Aquaculture XV(2):9–16 Shohel TA, Niner S, Gunawardana SJ (2022) ‘Even though I get a loan, my husband controls it’: Rheto- ric versus reality of empowering Bangladeshi women through microfinance programs. Eur J Dev Res 0123456789. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1057/ s41287- 022- 00539-9 Siddiqua A, Taskeen S, Nadia R, Rahman M, Islam SN (2021) Women empowerment and their role in ensuring household food security in Mymensingh Division of Bangladesh. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. https:// doi. org/ 10. 37506/ ijphrd. v12i3. 16080 Smith S, Bhattacharyya K (2016) Men’s perceptions of their roles and involvement in household decisions around food in rural Bangladesh. Feed the Future Project Sproule K, Kieran C, Quisumbing AR, Doss CR (2016) Gender, headship, and the life cycle: land owner- ship in four Asian countries. SSRN Electron J. https:// doi. org/ 10. 2139/ ssrn. 27411 11 Sultana F, Akter A (2021) Women e-Commerce: perspective in Bangladesh. J Manag Econ Ind Org 1–13. https:// doi. org/ 10. 31039/ jomei no. 2021.5. 3.1 Tiwari AJ, Srivastava B, Chatterjee R, Andrews AK (2019) Gender centrality of mobile financial services in Bangladesh. 35. https:// www. micro save. net/ wp- conte nt/ uploa ds/ 2019/ 04/ 25. 03. 19- Report- Gender- Centr ality- MFS- Bangl adesh. pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2023 Troell M, Costa-Pierce B, Stead S, Cottrell RS, Brugere C, Farmery AK, Little DC, Strand Å, Pullin R, Soto D, Beveridge M, Salie K, Dresdner J, Moraes-Valenti P, Blanchard J, James P, Yossa R, Allison E, Devaney C, Barg U (2023) Perspectives on aquaculture’s contribution to the sustainable development https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2373264 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01193-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105396 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105396 https://digitalarchive.worldfishcenter.org/handle/20.500.12348/4515 https://digitalarchive.worldfishcenter.org/handle/20.500.12348/4515 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105821 https://thescipub.com/abstract/jssp.2007.164.171 https://thescipub.com/abstract/jssp.2007.164.171 https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/576086/sdwp-67-financial-products-services-women-asia-pacific.pdf https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/576086/sdwp-67-financial-products-services-women-asia-pacific.pdf https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.04.007 https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117700419 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105515 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105515 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.06.027 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.01.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaf.2020.01.001 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-022-00539-9 https://doi.org/10.37506/ijphrd.v12i3.16080 https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2741111 https://doi.org/10.31039/jomeino.2021.5.3.1 https://www.microsave.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/25.03.19-Report-Gender-Centrality-MFS-Bangladesh.pdf https://www.microsave.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/25.03.19-Report-Gender-Centrality-MFS-Bangladesh.pdf Aquaculture International 1 3 goals for improved human and planetary health. J of the World Aquac Soc 54(2):251–342. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1111/ jwas. 12946 Vimala DD, Ravisankar T, Kumaran M, Rengarajan S, Krishnan M (2010) Self-help group makes fisher- women self-reliant: a story of success. Aquac Asia Mag 15:30–33 WFID Partnership (2022) Towards women’s financial inclusion : A gender data diagnostic of Bangladesh (Issue April). World Bank (2023) Sources: WDI for GDP, National Statistical Offices for national poverty rates, PIP as of April 2023, and Global Monitoring Database for the rest. Poverty & Equity Brief (Issue April). http:// www. world bank. org/ pover ty Worldfish (2020) Aquaculture: increasing income, diversifying diets, and empowering women in Bangla- desh and Nigeria ( IDEA ) Contribution to Outcomes (Issue December 2019). https:// digit alarc hive. world fishc enter. org/ bitst ream