CGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes 2012 Annual Performance Report Submitted to the CGIAR Consortium on behalf of all Partners by ICRISAT (Lead Center) 15 May 2013 CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 1 I. CRP PERFORMANCE MONITORING REPORT FOR JULY-DECEMBER 2012 A. Key Messages The CGIAR Research Program on Grain Legumes (hereafter referred to by its short name ‘GrainLegumes’) officially initiated operations on 1 July 2012. Despite its very recent origin, GrainLegumes has significant impacts and achievements to report, having inherited a portfolio of ongoing partnership-based work by the participating Centers CIAT, ICARDA, ICRISAT (lead), and IITA. The first major achievement of the new Program was receiving approval from the Fund Council on October 16, 2012 of the comprehensive 229-page proposal (fifth version). Intensive consultations among the partners over the two-year period of preparation that culminated in this approval formed a good basis of common understanding and coordination for this new initiative. Meanwhile, research-for-development (R4D) continued apace, delivering large impacts towards the four CGIAR System Level Outcomes in 2012. Major bean impact in Eastern/Southern Africa is one of two successes highlighted further below. Chickpea improvement continued to exhibit major impact in Ethiopia (one million households, 75% yield increase, projected $111 million benefits lifting 0.7 million people out of poverty by 2030), Andhra Pradesh (India) (area increased six-fold, production ten-fold) and Myanmar (sown area and yields have both doubled). An in-depth survey concluded that the adoption of modern groundnut varieties by 22% of farmers is contributing to food security in Nigeria. High-impact partnership garnered praise from the National Association of Smallholder Farmers of Malawi (NASFAM) and from Nigeria on inclusive market-oriented development, seed systems and aflatoxin management. Pigeonpea hybrids are poised for major impact in the coming years as the world’s first commercial hybrid of any grain legume crop. The hybrid ICPH 2740 was released in Andhra Pradesh in 2012, and tests in farmer’s fields indicate that a 35% increase in grain yield can be expected. Yet much remains to be done. India, the world’s largest pulse grain producer and consumer, still faces a challenging demand-supply gap. In Africa, the preliminary report of the CGIAR adoption study (DIIVA project) indicates relatively moderate adoption rates by 2010 for improved varieties in Africa for pigeonpea (34%), bean (32%), groundnut (22%), chickpea (20%), faba bean (14%), and lentil (10%) (estimates are not available for cowpea or soybean). These levels represent significant impacts in major production areas, but seed system constraints and policy & institutional shortcomings restrain them from being even higher. Intensive efforts continued to make headway in 2012 on improving seed availability through innovative approaches and projects such as ‘Tropical Legumes’. GrainLegumes’ global partnership also continued to achieve important progress in basic and applied research during the year. The complete sequencing of the chickpea genome is a highlight indicated below. In addition, leading-edge initiatives used molecular tools to explore the reservoirs of genetic diversity available in wild relative species and to overcome barriers to gene transfer into cultivated crops. Progress continued against difficult environmental stresses such as adaptation to drought, heat, low soil fertility, and resistance/tolerance to important diseases and insect pests. A better understanding of biological nitrogen fixation constraints and opportunities was gained, including the effects and interactions of drought, low phosphorous, and symbiotic bacterial diversity. Two major achievements/successes that GrainLegumes is pleased to highlight for 2012 are the following. 1) The sequencing of the complete chickpea genome was achieved by a global consortium led by ICRISAT in 2012, adding to the same milestone achieved for pigeonpea in 2011. Without the catalytic leadership of a CGIAR institution it is unlikely that these two developing-world crops would have joined the ranks of soybean (a highly industrialized crop) as the first three grain legume genomes CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 2 sequenced worldwide. Genome sequences and maps will greatly increase the effectiveness and efficiency of plant breeding over the coming years and decades. Cross-crop genomic learning will be a major benefit realized over time from GrainLegumes’ multi-crop R4D approach. 2) New/updated impact assessments during 2012 indicated that bean improvement has generated US$200 million in benefits to five million smallholder households in Eastern/Southern Africa. In 2012 five iron-biofortified varieties were released by Rwanda. They hail a new and important direction in grain legume breeding: the improvement of human nutrition. By 2013 it is expected that over half a million people will be consuming iron-rich beans. Financial summary: total expenditure, percentage allocated to gender research and total funding (from all sources, including bilateral and window 3) compared to expected budget Efforts began in late 2012 to establish management, governance and operations structures for oversight and implementation of GrainLegumes. Due to the delayed approval (16 October 2012) and consequent uncertainty about funding for most of the reporting period, the hiring of permanent staff was deferred and is expected to be completed in early 2013. The budget uncertainty was also a major reason why GrainLegumes underspent its budget by 29% during the period. B. Impact Pathway and Intermediate Development Outcomes GrainLegumes is developing its Intermediate Development Outcomes following the guidelines provided by the CGIAR Consortium. These will derive from the impact pathways outlined in the final approved proposal. C.1 Narrative of major achievements, by Theme The following sections are mainly organized according to Product Lines, because these are the outcome and impact-oriented themes approved by the Fund Council for GrainLegumes. This is not intended to overshadow the importance of cross-theme achievements and activities, which are reflected in GrainLegumes’ Strategic Components. Here are a few crosscutting highlights. Cross-theme selected highlights Molecular mapping is rapidly identifying more molecular markers and genes of value and their relatedness across the genomes of pigeonpea, chickpea, groundnut and related species. This makes more efficient and effective use of advanced molecular research facilities and expertise. These initiatives not only cut across themes, but also engage vigorous global partnerships. At the other end of the R4D spectrum – towards development impacts – the sharing of experiences and learning is equally valuable. For example, the distribution of seeds in small packs has proven effective across crops in increasing smallholder’s access to improved varieties. GrainLegumes is working with innovative seed organizations across crops to make small seed packs available. CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 3 Pulse crop production shortfalls are a major concern for India, the world’s largest producer and consumer. Many of the issues cut across pulse crops. A 2012 GrainLegumes policy brief analyzes the causes and recommends corrective actions. In a major cross-crop knowledge-sharing achievement, ICRISAT and the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) with partners worldwide organized and hosted the major Sixth International Conference on Legume Genetics and Genomics in Hyderabad, India during 2-7 October 2012, convening over 500 delegates from 44 countries who presented 62 talks and 293 posters in 13 sessions. Beyond cross-crops to cross-CGIAR, an intensive two-day meeting was held (3-4 September, Nairobi) by representatives from five Centers and three Consortium Research Programs (maize, human nutrition and grain legumes) to coordinate and harmonize their work on mycotoxins across crops and themes. Product Line 1 – Drought and low-phosphorous tolerant common bean, cowpea, and soybean Climbing beans are more than doubling bean yields in Rwanda, where the crop is a dietary staple. A 2012 impact assessment concluded the US$16 million investment in bean R4D in Eastern and Southern Africa over 17 years has yielded more than US$200 million in benefits for more than 5 million rural households in nine countries; improved bean varieties have been adopted on 1.6 million hectares, or nearly 60% of the bean area in the region. Benefiting from the efforts of HarvestPlus and GrainLegumes, Rwanda released five iron-rich bean varieties. These impacts were made possible through strong partnerships fostered by the Pan-Africa Bean Research Alliance (PABRA). Product Line 2 – Heat-tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba bean and lentil Global partnership led by ICRISAT completes the sequencing of the chickpea genome, opening new vistas for improvement of the crop and adding understanding of the crop’s evolution. Genetic differences in heat tolerance were quantified in different growth stages in chickpea (vegetative, flowering and grain-filling), identifying heat tolerant lines for use in breeding for adaptation to climate change. Product Line 3 – Short-duration, drought-tolerant and aflatoxin-free groundnut Vigorous efforts continued to broaden the genetic base of groundnut and introgress valuable traits through synthetic amphidiploids and the assessment of Bolivian landraces. Molecular markers used to characterize 72 wild Arachis accessions found much larger genetic diversity than in cultivated groundnut, including nine alleles associated with new genetic variability for potentially increasing grain oil content. Leading-edge research demonstrated that the DREB1A gene transgenically inserted into groundnut increases rooting depth by 20% under drought stress, increasing water extraction and increasing pod and root mass in comparison to vegetative mass. Groundnut lines genetically transformed with chitinase genes expressed resistance to Aspergillus flavus, the fungal agent of aflatoxin in seed inoculations, as well as resistance to the causal fungi of late leaf spot and rust diseases. Product Line 4 – High nitrogen-fixing chickpea, common bean, faba bean and soybean Drought-tolerant bean lines exhibited higher levels of improved biological nitrogen fixation. Product Line 5 – Insect-smart chickpea, cowpea, and pigeonpea production systems The genetic base of pigeonpea is being broadened for insect resistance and other difficult traits through molecular assessments of the crop’s evolution, gene pool diversity and gene flow as well as wide crosses to tertiary and quaternary gene pools. Progeny from crosses between pigeonpea and its secondary gene pool species Cajanus actifolius exhibited resistance to the crop’s most serious CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 4 insect pest, the Helicoverpa pod borer. Resistance was associated with high levels of flavonoids in flowers and buds; resistance via protease inhibitors was also identified in other wild relative species. Product Line 6 – Extra-early chickpea and lentil varieties Early-maturing chickpeas are having major impact in Ethiopia, India and Myanmar. Benefits to Ethiopia alone over the period 2001-2030 were projected to be worth US$111 million, changing smallholder’s lives. The land area sown to chickpea and grain yields in Myanmar doubled during 2001-09. Data were collected in Andhra Pradesh, India for a detailed impact assessment of the chickpea revolution to be published in 2013. Product Line 7 – Herbicide-tolerant, machine-harvestable chickpea, faba bean and lentil varieties Screening of 300 chickpea and 200 lentil genotypes for tolerance to two post-emergence herbicides, imazethapyr and metribuzin under field conditions revealed large genetic variation for herbicide tolerance. Product Line 8 – Pigeonpea hybrid and management practices Aggressive seed system capacity-building and dissemination efforts are underway to achieve a hybrid revolution in India. The pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2740 was released in 2012 in Andhra Pradesh state after demonstrating a 35% yield advantage in on-farm trials. Molecular markers associated with pigeonpea’s remarkable developmental plasticity, the determinate versus indeterminate growth habit, were mapped. Super-early non-hybrid pigeonpea lines (80-90 days to maturity) were bred for very short-season niches. C.2 Progress towards outputs GrainLegumes pursues outputs of useful germplasm, plant breeding and related knowledge, methodologies and specialized technology services to accelerate and expand impacts that benefit the poor. Product Line 1 – Drought and low-phosphorous tolerant common bean, cowpea, and soybean A yield trial of common bean under severe terminal drought testing three-species progenies resulted in lines with as much as 300 kg (30%) higher yield than drought tolerant, heat tolerant Phaseolus acutifolius. Sixty advanced cowpea breeding lines were identified with combined drought tolerance and resistance to Striga gesnerioides. Two sets each of twelve soybean lines tested in 2012 off-season at Kasinthula Research Station, Malawi showed significant differences under both intermittent and terminal drought. Product Line 2 – Heat-tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba bean and lentil Genetic variation in heat tolerance in chickpea was observed in anther development, pollination and pod set. ICARDA identified four common possible pleiotropic QTLs on linkage groups 3 and 4 of chickpea that are associated with drought resistance. The common assumption that breeding for deeper roots will increase drought resistance in chickpea was questioned by results from crop simulation modeling that instead predict a yield penalty from investing in additional root biomass. The EcoCrop model was adapted to the Andean bean gene pool in collaboration with the CGIAR Research Program CCAFS, showing far greater heat effects than on other bean gene pools. CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 5 Product Line 3 – Short-duration, drought-tolerant and aflatoxin-free groundnut ICRISAT’s advanced lysimeter/rainout shelter facility was used to more precisely measure genetic variability in transpiration efficiency (TE). Limited variation in TE was found during the low vapor pressure deficit (VPD) season while large variation was observed during the high VPD (dry) season. Seven out of nine transgenic events of groundnut overexpressing the rice chitinase gene showed lower Aspergillus flavus (causal agent of aflatoxin) infection than the resistant control cultivar J11. The distribution of Aspergillus species was mapped in Malawi over two years; 23-50% of 1,397 seed samples exceeded export limits of the toxin, especially those from drought-prone locations. High levels of resistance to Botrytis grey mold are not available in the cultivated chickpea gene pool. Progress was reported in 2012 in transferring resistance from the wild species Cicer reticulatum. Product Line 4 – High nitrogen-fixing chickpea, common bean, faba bean and soybean In collaboration with INRA-Morocco, phenotypic characterization of 123 rhizobia nodulating chickpea lines revealed wide variability for tolerance to heat, salinity, and water stress. Twenty faba bean lines were tested for their nitrogen efficiency under low phosphorous conditions in collaboration with INRA, Montpelier, France. Product Line 5 – Insect-smart chickpea, cowpea, and pigeonpea production systems Eighteen interspecific derivative lines of chickpea were found resistant to Helicoverpa pod borer. Transgenic chickpea events with cryIIAa were also evaluated for resistance; the event BS6H resulted in 100% larval mortality. Tests began on inoculating bean seed plants with the fungus Beauveria bassiana so that it can multiply inside the crop and colonize its grains, protecting against storage weevils. This would be much cheaper and easier than spraying this fungus on the entire commercial crop. Two Helicoverpa pod borer-tolerant pigeonpea genotypes, ENT 11 and ICPL 32WR were recommended for release in India. Detailed lab studies on the effect of combining neem oil and the pod borer-specific virus MaviMNPV on key insect pests of cowpea (aphids, thrips, pod borers and pod sucking bugs) found the bio- pesticide combination to be as or more effective than the standard chemical insecticide. A new efficient method for producing the virus was developed using sprouting cowpea grains. Product Line 6 – Extra-early chickpea and lentil varieties A baseline study assessed the potential for chickpea to be cultivated in the vast (12 million hectares) off-season rice fallow land in the Indo-Gangetic Plains; although the crop is well-adapted there, offseason drought, low prices and marketing issues constrain its adoption. For lentil, a baseline survey was carried out on potential areas for extra-early varieties in the short-season window between rice crops and in rice fallows in Bangladesh and Eastern India. Product Line 7 – Herbicide-tolerant, machine-harvestable chickpea, faba bean and lentil varieties A field screening technique was standardized for chickpea tolerance to two post-emergence herbicides (imizathapyr and metribuzin). Several genotypes tolerant to either imazethapyr or metribuzin were identified. Crosses were made to develop recombinant inbred lines. Large genetic variation was also observed in lentil. Forty-four elite lentil lines with machine harvestable traits were selected for evaluation and yield performance. Product Line 8 – Pigeonpea hybrid and management practices A new CMS source, A8 was identified from Cajanus reticulatus with promising maintainers. CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 6 Twenty experimental hybrids were produced by using female (A) lines possessing the obcordate leaf character that serves as a morphological marker to aid in the rogueing of off-types in the early vegetative stage. To study of the potential for spillover effects of pigeonpea hybrids across countries and eco-regions, a targeting study was carried out in 2012. Homologous zones suitable for pigeonpea production were identified. C.3 Progress towards the achievement of outcomes GrainLegumes outcomes mainly take the form of the adoption of improved varieties accompanied by supportive management practices, partnership and capacity-building, expertise and backstopping services. Product Line 1 – Drought and low-phosphorous tolerant common bean, cowpea, and soybean Drought resistant common bean varieties are poised for release in Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania. Two IITA-derived cowpea breeding lines were released officially in 2012 in Tanzania, and another two in Burkina Faso. To ensure relevancy to farmer’s needs, 1,700 cowpea farmers participated in participatory variety selection trials in West and Central Africa. Four promising lines were selected in Burkina Faso; nine in Ghana; and three in Nigeria. Product Line 2 – Heat-tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba bean and lentil Fifty-seven demonstrations were conducted under late sown conditions on heat tolerant chickpea cultivar JG 14 in two states (Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh), in India. The heat-tolerant cultivar JG 14 yielded 30% higher than the control in on-farm tests. Product Line 3 – Short-duration, drought-tolerant and aflatoxin-free groundnut Improved short-duration and drought tolerant varieties were introduced into Africa (Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Ghana, Malawi, Tanzania, Uganda, Mozambique, Zimbabwe) and Asia (India, Bangladesh). Over 15,000 farmers were involved in participatory varietal selection. High yielding ability under intermittent drought was confirmed in several groundnut lines. Two breeding lines, ICGVs 97183 and 02271, and one germplasm line ICG11088 were most promising. About 80 advanced groundnut lines were evaluated in participatory varietal selection in Asia and Africa by more than 15,000 farmers. In West/Central Africa, 85% of the 1,450 participating farmers were women. Five groundnut varieties in Uganda (Serenut 2 (ICGV 90704), Serenut 3R (ICGV-SM 93530), Serenut 5R (ICGV-SM 99566), Serenut 8R (SGV 99019), Serenut 11T (SGV 99031) and one (CTMG 6 (ICGV 05049) in India were released. Seven new varieties (5 in Mali and 2 in India) were proposed submitted for release. Fifteen new varieties (2 in Malawi, 4 in Uganda, and 9 in India) have entered National Performance Trials. Product Line 5 – Insect-smart chickpea, cowpea, and pigeonpea production systems In chickpea, technology for production of the biopesticide HaNPV was shared with farmers and is being adopted in Andhra Pradesh, India. Methomyl + spinosad + flubendiamide sprays are effective on chickpea for controlling pod borers; this information has been shared with national partners for extension to farmers. In cowpea, a youth self-help agri-enterprise in Benin is producing biopesticide mixtures. CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 7 In pigeonpea, two pod-borer tolerant genotypes were tested in over 100 on-farm trials and the farmers applied 1 to 2 less insecticide sprays on these genotypes than the commercial cultivars. These varieties are being released for cultivation to the farmers. Product Line 8 – Pigeonpea hybrid and management practices The pigeonpea hybrid ICPH 2740 was released in 2012 in Andhra Pradesh, India. A novel statistical method (GGE biplot) for evaluating the stability of new pigeonpea hybrids over environments was tested to identify optimum targeting of hybrid seed. C.4 Progress towards Impact Concerted efforts in seed multiplication received focus, since seed availability is a widespread constraint to impact. Development partners and farmers carried out most activities; CGIAR centers mostly played a catalytic and supporting role in capacity-building and nucleus/breeder seed production. Product Line 1 – Drought and low-phosphorous tolerant common bean, cowpea, and soybean Small seed packs make seed affordable by the poor, particularly women. An estimated 1.8 million female and 1.1 million male farmers were reached with small seed packets of bush habit bean in 2012, enough to plant about 135,000 hectares. About 5,000 kg of foundation seed of cowpea were produced in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Nigeria. About 700 demonstration plots were established in 120 communities in seven countries. Product Line 3 – Short-duration, drought-tolerant and aflatoxin-free groundnut Large quantities of breeder-class groundnut seed were multiplied and shared with partners: 22 tons in Asia, 7.7 tons in WCA and 0.32 tons in ESA. Groundnut quality seed was distributed in small packs in India (21.95 tons) and Bangladesh (1.45 tons). Over 2,000 farmers received such packs. Small packs of improved short-duration drought- tolerant groundnut varieties were made available to farmers in Asia, West and Central Africa (WCA) and Eastern and Southern Africa (ESA) in 2012. In Bangladesh, 1.45 tons seed of BARIchinabadam 8 and BARIchinabadam 4 were distributed by BARI to farmers for winter season sowing. In India, 9.0 tons of quality seed of ICGV 00351 (4 tons) and Co 6 (ICGV 87846, 5.0 tons) were distributed to farmers in Tamil Nadu. In Karnataka, 9.0 tons quality seed was distributed. In Odisha, 2.5 tons of quality seed were distributed to farmers. Product Line 4 – High nitrogen-fixing chickpea, common bean, faba bean and soybean Over 13,000 female and 8,800 male farmers were reached with small seed packets of climbing bean, sufficient for planting 1,200 hectares. A soybean value chain project in Malawi and Mozambique invigorated the seed system. Fifty tons of improved TGx variety seed was distributed to both private and community-based seed producers for multiplication of certified seeds during 2012/13 season. The project reached 4,000 households, and included training on household utilization of soybean. Product Line 5 – Insect-smart chickpea, cowpea, and pigeonpea production systems In Kenya, Tanzania, Malawi and Uganda, 7.5 tons of breeder, 19 tons of foundation, 39 tons of certified, and 8 tons of quality declared seed of pigeonpea were produced. Product Line 6 – Extra-early chickpea and lentil varieties Over 8,000 MT chickpea seed of improved cultivars was produced in sub-Saharan Africa (Ethiopia, Tanzania and Kenya). In South Asia 36,000 tons of quality seed of chickpea was produced in India CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 8 and 87 tons in Bangladesh. For lentil, 18 Village Seed HUBs were established and 495 tons of foundation, certified and truthfully-labeled seed were produced. Product Line 8 – Pigeonpea hybrid and management practices Fifty-five tons of certified seed and 30 tons of foundation seed were supplied to 8,000 farmers in Andhra Pradesh, Odisha and Bihar states of India to be commercially grown in 2012. For commercial cultivation in 2013, 327 tons of certified seed was produced of six cultivars (4 varieties and 2 hybrids) by 1,000 farmer-seed growers. Seed storage facilities (total 25 tons capacity) were constructed in villages in Odisha state. Partners multiplied seed to reach a goal of commercial hybrid cultivation on 100,000 hectares by 2014. Multiplication of A, B and R parent lines increased in 2012, generating 6,117 kg of nucleus/breeder seed. Government and private seed agencies were trained on hybrid seed production. C. GENDER RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS GrainLegumes is still at the early stages of implementing its proactive gender equity strategy described in the Program proposal. Nevertheless, a number of noteworthy 2012 achievements are: An estimated 1.8 million women farmers were reached with small seed packets of bush habit common beans in Africa – well in excess of the number of men reached (1.1 million). The same trend prevailed at a smaller scale for climbing bean seed packets (13,100 women vs. 8,780 men). In West Africa, participatory groundnut selection trials engaged 1,450 farmers, 85% of whom were women. In Mali, 1,750 farmers (90% women) and 44 extension agents were trained in integrated crop management practices including aflatoxin management. Sixteen women’s groups in Niger and six in Mali were assisted in quality seed production and entrepreneur-scale machinery that has increased seed production volumes and quality. Ten PhD students are conducting thesis research on various aspects of crop protection in grain legumes. Significant, though still far from numerically equal participation of women in formal capacity- building events is indicated in section E. D.2 Institutional architecture for gender mainstreaming Institutional gender mainstreaming highlights during 2012 were: A gender specialist, Dr. Therese Gondwe, was appointed by IITA and posted in Zambia to mainstream gender research on cowpea and soybean. GrainLegumes plans to hire four additional gender experts in 2013. In partnership with NGOs such as Care-Malawi, NASFAM and USAID Feed the Future, a target of at least 40% female engagement in project work has been agreed. D. PARTNERSHIP BUILDING ACHIEVEMENTS GrainLegumes is a partnership among ten primary institutions: four CGIAR Centers (CIAT, ICARDA, IITA and led by ICRISAT). The Generation Challenge Program will be a key collaborating partner until its completion date in 2014. Key collaborating partners include the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), the Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research (EIAR), the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), the Turkish General Directorate of Agricultural Research (GDAR), and the USAID-supported Legumes Innovation Lab and the Peanut and Mycotoxin Innovation Lab. CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 9 In addition to these primary partnerships, specific activities engage hundreds of additional partners from across the international, regional, governmental, non-governmental, civil society and private sectors. Space does not allow a comprehensive listing of the vast array of GrainLegumes’ partnerships. Practically every activity in the Program involves multiple partners. Only a few highlights can be accommodated within allowed space below. Being fundamental to GrainLegumes’ approach, priorities and strategy, the development of the Program’s proposal to the CGIAR was a focal point for partnership building in 2012. Numerous presentations and discussions to contribute ideas and shared commitment to GrainLegumes were made during the year (and in the prior two years of proposal development) to partners in different regions and sectors. Networking is a vital partnership mechanism for GrainLegumes. It provides a platform for increasing the collective critical mass of research expertise among countries in a region; enhances knowledge- sharing, capacity-building, and joint research; and creates a safety backup of expertise and resources in regions plagued by disruptions. The Pan-Africa Bean Research Alliance (PABRA) is one of GrainLegumes’ strongest partnership assets. Its record of achievement and impact with beans in Eastern and Southern Africa in 2012 was highlighted earlier. Links with many private and public seed companies were engaged and expanded in 2012 to enable the wide range of seed multiplication efforts listed in section C.4. Partnership with farmer’s groups is especially noteworthy, especially in participatory varietal selection and in farmers’ role in multiplying high-quality seed. E. CAPACITY BUILDING Thousands of individuals from public, non-governmental, farmer and university sectors benefited from GrainLegumes training experiences in 2012. Only some highlights are mentioned here. Product Lines 1, 2, 3. (Drought and low-phosphorous tolerant common bean, cowpea, and soybean; Heat-tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba bean and lentil; Short-duration, drought-tolerant and aflatoxin-free groundnut Twenty-four men and 5 women were in pre- and post-graduate training. Molecular breeding training in cowpea and soybean was one of the highlights, along with thesis work on various aspects of heat and drought tolerance. PL 4. High nitrogen-fixing chickpea, common bean, faba bean and soybean Advanced degree theses included an MSc on the interactive effects of inoculation, phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, growth and yield components of soybean; and on characterization of effective native rhizobial strains in Mozambique for enhanced nitrogen fixation in soybean. PL 5. Insect-smart chickpea, cowpea, and pigeonpea production systems Two graduate students, one male for PhD and one female for MSc, have begun their degree research work on thrips and aphid resistance. A female PhD student is studying bio-pesticides for cowpea. Ten PhD students are conducting thesis research on various aspects of crop protection in grain legumes. PL 6. Extra-early chickpea and lentil varieties 208 extension personnel from Ethiopia, Tanzania, and Kenya were trained on crop management and quality seed production of chickpea. 2,293 farmers from the same countries were trained on integrated crop management technologies. 2,886 Indian farmers (25% women) and four thousand from Bangladesh (20% women) were trained in improved chickpea and lentil technologies. CGI AR R e se arc h P rog ram on Gra i n L eg um es An n ua l R epo rt for Ju ly -D ece mb er 2 012 Page | 10 PL 8. Pigeonpea hybrid and management practices 1,501 farmers, including 139 women, plus more than 50 seed technologists from the private sector were trained in pigeonpea variety and hybrid seed production. F. RISK MANAGEMENT The value of grain legumes and area sown to them in low-income food deficit countries (defined by FAO) is on par with that of tropical cereals such as maize. However grain legume crops’ footprint is fragmented among multiple crops, mainly the eight priority grain legumes addressed by this Program. Despite the crucial value that such crop diversity provides to farmers, it is much easier for institutions to focus on simple single-crop systems. Hence this fragmentation has led to lower degrees of government policy support, less global R4D support, and impact pathway challenges in areas such as seed multiplication, information dissemination and marketing. One important consequence of these challenges has been the displacement of grain legumes cultivation into more marginal environments prone to drought and low soil fertility during the past few decades. These challenges increase both the importance, and the risk of investing in grain legume R4D. To manage these risks, GrainLegumes R4D in 2012 continued major efforts on breeding for stress resistance in marginal environments, and on improving seed systems. Important progress has been achieved, as described earlier. Broadening the narrow genetic base of groundnut and pigeonpea also received attention as highlighted earlier. At the administrative level of GrainLegumes, the uncertainty surrounding the approval and funding of the Program constrained program implementation during 2012 as explained in the first section of this report. Now that the Program and budget are approved, this risk has been controlled. G. LESSONS LEARNED The year 2012 was replete with important lessons for GrainLegumes. A major lesson was to invest heavily in strengthening partnerships and communications in order to gain the collective understanding and momentum needed to carry out grain legume improvement in the new cross- crop, cross-institution and cross-theme manner. As of early 2013, this remains a very active effort. Within the R4D agenda, a noteworthy lesson has been the crucial importance of investing in seed systems development in order to fulfill the impact potential of new varieties. In decades past, seed systems were usually considered to be beyond the remit of CGIAR centers and their NARS partners. However, grain legume seed systems face a number of difficulties that are greater than for other crops, such as low seed-to-seed ratio, seed perishability, low seed volumes, and difficulties in in developing hybrid biological and technological and economic systems. The realization that these difficulties must be addressed, institutional traditions notwithstanding, has led to a much more activist engagement in seed systems development over the past decade, made possible through crucial increases in investor support. As a result, the seed systems obstacle is being steadily eroded. Lessons learned also include important targets that remain to be fully addressed. Especially important are gender equity; cross-institute and cross-crop activities and knowledge sharing; and the need for enhanced awareness of the benefits of investing in grain legume R4D and stronger advocacy in support of that objective. Since GrainLegumes has only recently been launched, our first estimates of progress indicators (Table 1) are few and tentative. As GrainLegumes is implemented fully in 2013, it will establish firm metrics for each of the required indicators that can be more reliably assessed that year. CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 11 Annex 1: CRP indicators of progress, with glossary and targets CRPs Indicator Glossary/guidelines for measuring the indicator Deviation 2012 2013 2014 concerned narrative by this (if actual is indicator more than 10% away from target) Target (if Actual Target Target available for 2012) KNOWLEDGE, TOOLS, DATA All 1. Number of flagship These are frameworks and concepts that are significant and 0 1 3 “products” produced by CRP complete enough to have been highlighted on web pages, publicized through blog stories, press releases and/or policy briefs. They are significant in that they should be likely to change the way stakeholders along the impact pathway allocate resources and/or implement activities. They should be products that change the way these stakeholders think and act. Tools, decision-support tools, guidelines and/or training manuals are not included in this indicator All 2. % of flagship products The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs 0 1 3 produced that have explicit supporting indicator #1 must have an explicit focus on women target of women farmers/NRM managers to be counted farmers/NRM managers All 3. % of flagship products Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on 0 0 2 produced that have been gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted assessed for likely gender- disaggregated impact All 4. Number of ”tools” These are significant decision-support tools, guidelines, and/or 0 0 0 produced by CRP training manuals that are significant and complete enough to have been highlighted on web pages, publicized through blog stories, press releases and/or policy briefs. They are significant in that they should be likely to change the way stakeholders along the impact pathway allocate resources and/or implement activities CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 12 All 5. % of tools that have an The web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy briefs 0 0 0 explicit target of women supporting indicator #4 must have an explicit focus on women farmers farmers/NRM managers to be counted All 6. % of tools assessed for Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on 0 0 0 likely gender-disaggregated gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted impact All 7. Number of open access 2 3 3 databases maintained by CRP All 8. Total number of users of 0 50 100 these open access databases All 9. Number of publications in 15 7 7 ISI journals produced by CRP 1,2,3, 4, 6 10. Number of strategic 5 5 5 value chains analyzed by CRP 1,5,6,7 11. Number of targeted Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of - - - agro-ecosystems cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, analysed/characterised by 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and CRP Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems and specify the regions concerned 1,5,6,7 12. Estimated population of - - - above-mentioned agro- ecosystems CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT AND INNOVATION PLATFORMS All 13. Number of trainees in The number of individuals to whom significant knowledge or skills 3552 4000 5000 short-term programs have been imparted through interactions that are intentional, facilitated by CRP (male) structured, and purposed for imparting knowledge or skills should be counted. This includes farmers, ranchers, fishers, and other primary sector producers who receive training in a variety of best practices in productivity, post-harvest management, linking to markets, etc. It also includes rural entrepreneurs, processors, managers and traders receiving training in application of new technologies, business management, linking to markets, etc., and training to extension specialists, researchers, policymakers and others who are engaged in the food, feed and fiber system and CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 13 natural resources and water management. Include training on climate risk analysis, adaptation, mitigation, and vulnerability assessments, as it relates to agriculture. Training should include food security, water resources management/IWRM, sustainable agriculture, and climate change resilience . All 14. Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) 6323 6000 8000 short-term programs facilitated by CRP (female) All 15. Number of trainees in The number of people who are currently enrolled in or graduated 24 24 24 long-term programs in the current fiscal year from a bachelor’s, master’s or Ph.D. facilitated by CRP (male) program or are currently participating in or have completed in the current fiscal year a long term (degree-seeking) advanced training program such as a fellowship program or a post-doctoral studies program. A person completing one long term training program in the fiscal year and currently participating in another long term training program should be counted only once. All 16.Number of trainees in (see above, but for female) 5 6 8 long-term programs facilitated by CRP (female) 1,5,6,7 17. Number of multi- To be counted, a multi-stakeholder platform has to have a clear stakeholder R4D innovation purpose, generally to manage some type of tradeoff/conflict platforms established for the among the different interests of different stakeholders in the targeted agro-ecosystems by targeted agro-ecosystems, and inclusive and clear governance the CRPs mechanisms, leading to decisions to manage the variety of perspectives of stakeholders in a manner satisfactory to the whole platform. TECHNOLOGIES/PRACTICES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 18. Number of Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related and NRM- 10 10 12 technologies/NRM practices related technologies and innovations including those that address under research in the CRP climate change adaptation and mitigation. Relevant technologies (Phase I) include but are not limited to: • Mechanical and physical: New land preparation, harvesting, processing and product handling technologies, including CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 14 biodegradable packaging • Biological: New germplasm (varieties, breeds, etc.) that could be higher-yielding or higher in nutritional content and/or more resilient to climate impacts; affordable food-based nutritional supplementation such as vitamin A-rich sweet potatoes or rice, or high-protein maize, or improved livestock breeds; soil management practices that increase biotic activity and soil organic matter levels; and livestock health services and products such as vaccines; • Chemical: Fertilizers, insecticides, and pesticides sustainably and environmentally applied, and soil amendments that increase fertilizer-use efficiencies; • Management and cultural practices: sustainable water management; practices; sustainable land management practices; sustainable fishing practices; Information technology, improved/sustainable agricultural production and marketing practices, increased use of climate information for planning disaster risk strategies in place, climate change mitigation and energy efficiency, and natural resource management practices that increase productivity and/or resiliency to climate change. IPM, ISFM, and PHH as related to agriculture should all be included as improved technologies or management practices. New technologies or management practices under research counted should be only those under research in the current reporting year. Any new technology or management practice under research in a previous year but not under research in the reporting year should not be included. All 19. % of technologies under The papers, web pages, blog stories, press releases and policy 60% 60 60 research that have an explicit briefs supporting indicator #x must have an explicit focus on target of women farmers women farmers/NRM managers to be counted All 20. % of technologies under Reports/papers describing the products should include a focus on 0 20 20 research that have been gender-disaggregated impacts if they are to be counted assessed for likely gender- disaggregated impact 1,5,6,7 21 Number of agro- Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of - - - CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 15 ecosystems for which CRP cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, has identified feasible 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and approaches for improving Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems; identify the ecosystem services and for regions if possible establishing positive incentives for farmers to improve ecosystem functions as per the CRP’s recommendations 1,5,6,7 22. Number of people who Indicate the potential number of both women and men - - - will potentially benefit from plans, once finalised, for the scaling up of strategies All, except 23. Number of technologies Under “field testing” means that research has moved from focused 7 7 10 2 /NRM practices field tested development to broader testing and this testing is underway under (phase II) conditions intended to duplicate those encountered by potential users of the new technology. This might be in the actual facilities (fields) of potential users, or it might be in a facility set up to duplicate those conditions. 1,5,6,7 24. Number of agro- Use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) typology of - - - ecosystems for which cultivated systems and of forests and woodland systems (MEA, innovations (technologies, 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and policies, practices, Trends, Volume 1) to define these agro-ecosystems and specify the integrative approaches) and regions where field testing is underway options for improvement at system level have been developed and are being field tested (Phase II) 1,5,6,7 25. % of above - - - innovations/approaches/opti ons that are targeted at decreasing inequality between men and women 1,5,6,7 26. Number of published - - - research outputs from CRP utilised in targeted agro- CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 16 ecosystems All, except 27.Number of In the case of crop research that developed a new variety, e.g., the 10 12 12 2 technologies/NRM practices variety must have passed through any required approval process, released by public and and seed of the new variety should be available for multiplication. private sector partners The technology should have proven benefits and be as ready for globally (phase III) use as it can be as it emerges from the research and testing process. Technologies made available for transfer should be only those made available in the current reporting year. Any technology made available in a previous year should not be included. POLICIES IN VARIOUS STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT All 28. Numbers of Policies/ Number of agricultural enabling environment policies / regulations Regulations/ Administrative / administrative procedures in the areas of agricultural resource, Procedures food, market standards & regulation, public investment, natural Analyzed (Stage 1) resource or water management and climate change adaptation/mitigation as it relates to agriculture that underwent the first stage of the policy reform process i.e. analysis (review of existing policy / regulation / administrative procedure and/or proposal of new policy / regulations / administrative procedures). . Please count the highest stage completed during the reporting year – don't double count for the same policy. All 29. Number of policies / ….. ……that underwent the second stage of the policy reform regulations / administrative process. The second stage includes public debate and/or procedures drafted and consultation with stakeholders on the proposed new or revised presented for policy / regulation / administrative procedure. public/stakeholder consultation (Stage 2) All 30. Number of policies / : … underwent the third stage of the policy reform process regulations / administrative (policies were presented for legislation/decree to improve the procedures presented for policy environment for smallholder-based agriculture.) legislation(Stage 3) All 31. Number of policies / : …underwent the fourth stage of the policy reform process regulations / administrative (official approval (legislation/decree) of new or revised policy / CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 17 procedures prepared regulation / administrative procedure by relevant authority). passed/approved (Stage 4) All 32. Number of policies / : …completed the policy reform process (implementation of new 3 2 2 regulations / administrative or revised policy / regulation / administrative procedure by procedures passed for which relevant authority) implementation has begun (Stage 5) OUTCOMES ON THE GROUND All 33. Number of hectares Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the BEANS: PL6: under improved technologies application of technologies is on a new or continuing area (new area PL1: 8000 ha in 2012) 200,000 ha or management practices as PL1: PL4: 2000 a result of CRP research 134,632 ha ha PL7: in ESA 1000 ha PL4: 1200 PL6: 7000 ha in E ha Africa PL6: 5000 ha All 34. Number of farmers and Indicate the regions where this is occurring and whether the BEANS: others who have applied application of technologies is on a new or continuing area and new reach PL1: in 2012 34a) new technologies or indicate: 1,800,000 management practices as a 34 (a) number of women farmers concerned PL1: 34b) result of CRP research 34(b) number of male farmers concerned 1,000,000 34. a) 1,814,893 PL4: women 34a) 15,000 34.b) 34b) 1,091,552 10,000 men PL4: 34. a) 13,143 women 34. b) 8,780 men CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly-December 2012 Page | 18 Annex 2: Performance indicators for gender mainstreaming with targets defined Performance Indicator CRP performance approaches CRP performance meets requirements CRP performance exceeds requirements requirements 1. Gender inequality Sex-disaggregated social data is Sex-disaggregated social data collected and Sex-disaggregated social data collected and used to diagnose targets defined being collected and used to diagnose used to diagnose important gender-related important gender-related constraints in at least one of the important gender-related constraints in at least one of the CRP’s main CRP’s main target populations constraints in at least one of the target populations The CRP has defined and collected baseline data on the CRP’s main target populations And main dimensions of gender inequality in the CRP’s main target populations relevant to its expected outcomes (IDOs) The CRP has defined and collected baseline data on the main dimensions of gender CRP targets changes in levels of gender inequality to which inequality in the CRP’s main target the CRP is or plans to contribute, with related numbers of populations relevant to its expected men and women beneficiaries in main target populations outcomes ( IDOs) 2. Institutional - CRP scientists and managers with - CRP scientists and managers with CRP scientists and managers with responsibility for gender in architecture for integration responsibility for gender in the CRP’s responsibility for gender in the CRP’s the CRP’s outputs are appointed, have written TORS and of gender is in place outputs are appointed, have written outputs are appointed, have written TORS funds allocated to support their interaction. TORS. and funds allocated to support their - Procedures defined to report use of available diagnostic or interaction. - Procedures defined to report use of baseline knowledge on gender routinely for assessment of available diagnostic or baseline - Procedures defined to report use of the gender equality implications of the CRP’s flagship knowledge on gender routinely for available diagnostic or baseline knowledge research products as per the Gender Strategy assessment of the gender equality on gender routinely for assessment of the -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking progress on implications of the CRP’s flagship gender equality implications of the CRP’s integration of gender in research research products as per the Gender flagship research products as per the Gender Strategy Strategy A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysis -CRP M&E system has protocol for -CRP M&E system has protocol for tracking tracking progress on integration of progress on integration of gender in The CRP uses feedback provided by its M&E system to gender in research research improve its integration of gender into research A CRP plan approved for capacity development in gender analysis CRP on Grain Legu mes An nual Repor t fo r Ju ly -December 2012 Page | 19 Annex 3: CRP Financial Reporting Templates – as per the attached Excel file 1. Report L101 - Annual CRP Financial Summary – by CG Participant 2. Report L102 – Cumulative CRP Financial Summary – CG Participant 3. Report L111 - CRP Annual Finance Plan Summary (by Center, Windows 1 and 2) 4. Report L121 - CRP Expenditure by natural classification- by CG Center 5. Report L131 – CRP Expenditure by Theme 6. Report L201 - CRP Bilateral Grants Summary - by CG Center 7. Report L211 - CRP Partnerships Report- by CG Center 8. Report L401 - CRP Funding Statement – Windows 1 and 2 Report Description L101 Report L101 Name of Report CRP Cumulative Financial Summary Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 CRP  : Grain legumes (a) Cumulative budget per annual financial plans (b) Actual Expenses ‐ Cumulative (c) Variance ‐ Cumulative Windows    Center Window    Bilateral  Center  Total  Windows    Window    Bilateral  Center  Total  Windows    s Window    Bilateral  Center  Total  1 & 2 3 funding Funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding Funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding Funds Funding CIAT          1,540                  ‐            4,976                  ‐            6,516          1,407                 ‐            3,380                  ‐            4,787             133                 ‐            1,596                 ‐            1,729  ICARDA          1,604              369           1,891                  ‐            3,864          1,235             257             739                  ‐            2,231             369             112          1,152                 ‐            1,633  ICRISAT          4,087           6,476           6,719                  ‐         17,282          3,002          4,626          4,799                  ‐         12,427          1,085          1,850          1,920                 ‐            4,855  IITA          2,880           1,504           2,401                  ‐            6,785          1,823             782          2,254                  ‐            4,859          1,057             722             147                 ‐            1,926  GCP                 ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                    ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐     Total        10,111           8,349        15,987                  ‐         34,447           7,467           5,665        11,172                  ‐         24,304           2,644           2,684           4,815                  ‐         10,143  Percentage 29% 24% 46% 0% 100% 31% 23% 46%                 ‐    100% 26% 26% 47% 0% 100% Report Description L106 Report L106 Name of Report CRP Annual Funding Summary Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               1 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 CRP Grain legumes PART 1 ‐ Annual FINANCE PLAN (Totals for Windows 1 and 2 combined) Approved Level for Year ‐ Initial Approval               ‐ Approved Level for Year ‐ Final Amount               ‐ PART 2 ‐ Funding Summary for Year CRP 2012 Actual Funding Name of the Donor Window 1 Window 2 Window 3 Bilateral  Total  funding Funding AATF                ‐                  (7)                (7) AFESD                ‐                24               24  African Wildlife Foundation                ‐                   5                 5  Aga Khan Foundation                 ‐                   3                 3  AGRA                 ‐                31               31  ARC                ‐                   4                 4  ASARECA                 ‐                10               10  Australia                 41              116             157  AVRDC                ‐                36               36  BBSRC                ‐                24               24  Belgium                ‐                   1                 1  Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation           4,440               ‐         4,440  Canada                ‐                54               54  CARE, Malawi                 ‐                   7                 7  European Commission               627              283             910  CFC                ‐              289             289  CGIAR                ‐                   2                 2  CHINA                  40               ‐               40  CIAT                ‐              191             191  CIDA                ‐           1,690         1,690  CIMMYT                ‐              152             152  CIP                ‐                21               21  CORAF/WECARD                ‐                21               21  FAO                 ‐                53               53  FARA, Ghana                 ‐                57               57  Fiduciaria Bogota                ‐                18               18  GCP                ‐           1,038         1,038  Graduate Fellowship training                ‐                   2                 2  ICRISAT                ‐              549             549  IER, Mali                 ‐                   2                 2  IFAD                ‐              270             270  IFPRI                ‐                   1                 1  IITA                ‐                90               90  ILRI                ‐                32               32  India               216           1,677         1,893  IRAN                ‐                14               14  IRELAND                 ‐              407             407  ISDB                ‐                10               10  Japan                ‐              168             168  JIRCAS                ‐                51               51  Kuwait Fund                ‐                15               15  McKnight                ‐              212             212  Netherlands               ‐              122             122  Nigeria                ‐                24               24  OFID                ‐                82               82  OSAKA                ‐                   5                 5  PHILLIPPINES                 ‐                95               95  Portugal                ‐                16               16  PURDUE University                ‐                87               87  SDC                ‐              588             588  SWITZERLAND                 ‐                   8                 8  Tottori University                ‐               ‐                ‐    UF                ‐                18               18  UNIDO                ‐                   0                 0  University of Saskatchewan                ‐                10               10  USAID               289           1,793         2,082  Wegeningen university                ‐              702             702  Zambia Aflatoxin Research & Mitigation                 12               ‐               12  Totals for CRP                ‐                   ‐            5,665        11,172        16,837  Report Description L111 Report L111 Name of Report CRP Annual Financial Summary Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 (a) CRP2012  Fin plan approved budget (b) CRP 2012 Expenditure (c) Variance this Year Windows    Center Window    Bilateral  Center  Total  Windows    s Window    Bilateral  Center  Total  Windows    Window    Bilateral  Center  Total  1 & 2 3 funding Funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding Funds Funding 1 & 2 3 funding Funds Funding CIAT          1,540                  ‐            4,976                  ‐            6,516          1,407                 ‐            3,380                  ‐            4,787             133                 ‐            1,596                 ‐            1,729  ICARDA          1,604              369           1,891                  ‐            3,864          1,235             257             739                  ‐            2,231             369             112          1,152                 ‐            1,633  ICRISAT          4,087           6,476           6,719                  ‐         17,282          3,002          4,626          4,799                  ‐         12,427          1,085          1,850          1,920                 ‐            4,855  IITA          2,880           1,504           2,401                  ‐            6,785          1,823             782          2,254                  ‐            4,859          1,057             722             147                 ‐            1,926  GCP                 ‐                    ‐                    ‐                    ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                    ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐     Total        10,111           8,349        15,987                  ‐         34,447           7,467           5,665        11,172                  ‐         24,304           2,644           2,684           4,815                  ‐         10,143  Percentage 29% 24% 46% 0% 100% 31% 23% 46% 0% 100% 26% 26% 47% 0% 100% Report Description L121 Report L121 Name of Report CRP Financial Report ‐ Expenditure by natural classification (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Annual budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget CIAT Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Total Total Total 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds Personnel                660                    ‐              1,742                    ‐              2,402                644                    ‐                 633                    ‐              1,277                   16                    ‐              1,109                    ‐              1,125  Collaborator Costs ‐ CGIAR Centers                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Collaborator Costs ‐ Others                   ‐                      ‐              1,074                    ‐              1,074                    ‐                      ‐              1,146                    ‐              1,146                    ‐                      ‐                  (72)                   ‐                  (72) Supplies and Services               487                    ‐                 912                    ‐              1,399                474                    ‐                 680                    ‐              1,154                   13                    ‐                 232                    ‐                 245  Operational Travel                  31                    ‐                 545                    ‐                 576                   31                    ‐                 545                    ‐                 576                    ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Depreciation               127                    ‐                 192                    ‐                 319                   43                    ‐                   79                    ‐                 122                   84                    ‐                 113                    ‐                 197       Sub‐total of Direct Costs            1,305                    ‐              4,465                    ‐              5,770             1,192                    ‐              3,083                    ‐              4,275                113                    ‐              1,382                    ‐              1,495  Indirect Costs               235                    ‐                 511                    ‐                 746                215                    ‐                 297                    ‐                 512                   20                    ‐                 214                    ‐                 234       Total ‐ all Costs            1,540                    ‐              4,976                   ‐              6,516            1,407                   ‐              3,380                    ‐              4,787               133                   ‐              1,596                   ‐              1,729  Annual budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget ICARDA Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Total Total Total 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds Personnel                760                130                658                    ‐              1,548                655                114                229                    ‐                 998                105                   16                429                    ‐                 550  Collaborator Costs ‐ CGIAR Centers                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Collaborator Costs ‐ Others               100                   50                254                    ‐                 404                    ‐                   27                149                    ‐                 176                100                   23                105                    ‐                 228  Supplies and Services               360                   75                408                    ‐                 843                350                   49                210                    ‐                 609                   10                   26                198                    ‐                 234  Operational Travel                  85                   70                332                    ‐                 487                   24                   29                   73                    ‐                 126                   61                   41                259                    ‐                 361  Depreciation                  32                    ‐                 122                    ‐                 154                    ‐                      ‐                   15                    ‐                   15                   32                    ‐                 107                    ‐                 139       Sub‐total of Direct Costs            1,337                325             1,774                    ‐              3,436             1,029                219                676                    ‐              1,924                308                106             1,098                    ‐              1,512  Indirect Costs               267                   44                117                    ‐                 428                206                   38                   63                    ‐                 307                   61                     6                   54                    ‐                 121       Total ‐ all Costs            1,604                369            1,891                   ‐              3,864            1,235               257               739                    ‐              2,231               369               112            1,152                   ‐              1,633  Annual budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget ICRISAT Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Total Total Total 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds Personnel             1,427             1,021             1,443                    ‐              3,891                839                729             1,031                    ‐              2,599                588                292                412                    ‐              1,292  Collaborator Costs ‐ CGIAR Centers                   ‐              2,549                   81                    ‐              2,631                    ‐              1,821                   58                    ‐              1,879                    ‐                 728                   23                    ‐                 752  Collaborator Costs ‐ Others               152                938                787                    ‐              1,877                152                670                562                    ‐              1,384                    ‐                 268                225                    ‐                 493  Supplies and Services            1,342                953             2,414                    ‐              4,709             1,183                681             1,724                    ‐              3,588                159                272                690                    ‐              1,121  Operational Travel               373                161                367                    ‐                 901                112                115                262                    ‐                 489                261                   46                105                    ‐                 412  Depreciation               216                448                752                    ‐              1,416                199                320                537                    ‐              1,056                   17                128                215                    ‐                 360       Sub‐total of Direct Costs            3,510             6,070             5,844                    ‐            15,424             2,485             4,336             4,174                    ‐            10,995             1,025             1,734             1,670                    ‐              4,429  Indirect Costs               577                406                875                    ‐              1,858                517                290                625                    ‐              1,432                   60                116                250                    ‐                 426       Total ‐ all Costs            4,087             6,476            6,719                   ‐            17,282            3,002            4,626            4,799                    ‐            12,427            1,085            1,850            1,920                   ‐              4,855  Report Description L121 Report L121 Name of Report CRP Financial Report ‐ Expenditure by natural classification (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Annual budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget IITA Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Total Total Total 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds Personnel                879                406                603                    ‐              1,888                454                217                573                    ‐              1,244                425                189                   30                    ‐                 644  Collaborator Costs ‐ CGIAR Centers               177                    ‐                   81                    ‐                 258                    ‐                      ‐                   40                    ‐                   40                177                    ‐                   41                    ‐                 218  Collaborator Costs ‐ Others               289                184                385                    ‐                 858                    ‐                   96                348                    ‐                 444                289                   88                   37                    ‐                 414  Supplies and Services               772                526                728                    ‐              2,026             1,010                225                680                    ‐              1,915               (238)               301                   48                    ‐                 111  Operational Travel               234                119                227                    ‐                 580                   77                   90                192                    ‐                 359                157                   29                   35                    ‐                 221  Depreciation               100                123                   85                    ‐                 308                   10                   60                   94                    ‐                 164                   90                   63                   (9)                   ‐                 144       Sub‐total of Direct Costs            2,451             1,358             2,109                    ‐              5,918             1,551                688             1,927                    ‐              4,166                900                670                182                    ‐              1,752  Indirect Costs               429                146                292                    ‐                 867                272                   94                327                    ‐                 693                157                   52                 (35)                   ‐                 174       Total ‐ all Costs            2,880             1,504            2,401                   ‐              6,785            1,823               782            2,254                    ‐              4,859            1,057               722               147                   ‐              1,926  Annual budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget GCP Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Total Total Total 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds Personnel                    ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Collaborator Costs ‐ CGIAR Centers                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Collaborator Costs ‐ Others                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Supplies and Services                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Operational Travel                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Depreciation                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐         Sub‐total of Direct Costs                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐    Indirect Costs                   ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐                      ‐         Total ‐ all Costs                   ‐                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                      ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐                     ‐    Annual budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget Totals for CRP Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Windows    Window      Bilateral  Center  Total Total Total 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds 1 & 2 funds 3 funding Funds Personnel             3,726             1,557             4,446                    ‐              9,729             2,592             1,060             2,465                    ‐              6,117             1,134                497             1,980                    ‐              3,611  Collaborator Costs ‐ CGIAR Centers               177             2,549                162                    ‐              2,889                    ‐              1,821                   98                    ‐              1,919                177                728                   64                    ‐                 970  Collaborator Costs ‐ Others               541             1,172             2,500                    ‐              4,213                152                793             2,205                    ‐              3,150                389                379                295                    ‐              1,063  Supplies and Services            2,961             1,554             4,462                    ‐              8,977             3,018                955             3,294                    ‐              7,267                 (56)               599             1,168                    ‐              1,711  Operational Travel               723                350             1,471                    ‐              2,544                244                234             1,072                    ‐              1,550                479                116                399                    ‐                 994  Depreciation               475                571             1,151                    ‐              2,197                252                380                725                    ‐              1,357                223                191                426                    ‐                 840       Sub‐total of Direct Costs            8,603             7,753           14,192                    ‐            30,548             6,258             5,243             9,859                    ‐            21,360             2,346             2,510             4,332                    ‐              9,188  Indirect Costs            1,508                596             1,795                    ‐              3,899             1,209                422             1,313                    ‐              2,944                298                174                483                    ‐                 955       Total ‐ all Costs          10,111             8,349          15,987                   ‐            34,447            7,467            5,665          11,172                    ‐            24,304            2,644            2,684            4,815                   ‐            10,143  Templates for CRP Reporting Report L131 Report Description L131 Name of Report CRP Themes Report (by Center, and Funding Source) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Anuual Budget Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget CIAT  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  PL 1 Drought and low‐phosphorus tolerant              863                 ‐            3,323                 ‐            4,186              788                 ‐            2,457                 ‐            3,245                75                 ‐               866                 ‐               941  common bean, cowpea and soybean PL2  Heat tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba              169                 ‐               271                 ‐               440              155                 ‐               184                 ‐               339                14                 ‐                 87                 ‐               101  bean and lentil PL 3 Short‐duration, drought tolerant and                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    aflatoxin‐free groundnut PL 4 High nitrogen‐fixing chickpea, common              508                 ‐            1,382                 ‐            1,890              464                 ‐               739                 ‐            1,203                44                 ‐               643                 ‐               687  bean, faba bean and soybean PL 5 Insect‐smart chickpea, cowpea and                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    pigeonpea production systems PL 6 Extra‐early chickpea and lentil varieties                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    PL 7 Herbicide tolerant, machine‐harvestable                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    chickpea, faba bean, lentil varieties PL 8 Hybrid pigeonpea                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    CRP Management/Coordination                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    Gender Strategies                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐          Total – all Costs          1,540                 ‐            4,976                 ‐            6,516          1,407                 ‐            3,380                 ‐            4,787              133                 ‐            1,596                 ‐            1,729  Anuual Budget (a) Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget ICARDA  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  PL 1 Socio‐economics studies                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    PL2  Germplasm evaluation and pre‐breeding             415               86             415                ‐               916             320               51             136                 ‐               507               95               35             279                ‐               409  PL 3 Developing heat & drought tolerant                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    PL 4 Developing high nitrogen fixing              188               75             118                ‐               381             115               51               11                 ‐               177               73               24             107                ‐               204  PL 5 Insect‐smart chickpea, cowpea and              126                65                65                 ‐               256                67                50                 ‐                   ‐               117                59                15                65                 ‐               139  pigeonpea production systems PL 6 Extra‐early chickpea and lentil varieties             463               65             716                ‐           1,244             381               54             465                 ‐               900               82               11             251                ‐               344  PL 7 Herbicide tolerant, machine‐harvestable              412                78              577                 ‐            1,067              352                51              127                 ‐               530                60                27              450                 ‐               537  chickpea, faba bean, lentil varieties PL 8 Grain Legume seed system                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    PL 9 Hybrid pigeonpea                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    CRP Management/Coordination                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    Gender Strategies                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐          Total – all Costs          1,604              369          1,891                 ‐            3,864          1,235              257              739                 ‐            2,231              369              112          1,152                 ‐            1,633  Templates for CRP Reporting Report L131 Report Description L131 Name of Report CRP Themes Report (by Center, and Funding Source) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Anuual Budget (a) Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget ICRISAT  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  PL 1 Drought and low‐phosphorus tolerant                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    common bean, cowpea and soybean PL2  Heat tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba              335              648              672                 ‐            1,655              299              463              480                 ‐            1,242                36              185              192                 ‐                413  bean and lentil PL 3 Short‐duration, drought tolerant and          1,173          2,267          2,352                 ‐            5,791          1,049          1,619          1,680                 ‐            4,348              124              648              672                 ‐            1,443  aflatoxin‐free groundnut PL 4 High nitrogen‐fixing chickpea, common              101              194              202                 ‐               497                88              139              144                 ‐                371                13                55                58                 ‐                126  bean, faba bean and soybean PL 5 Insect‐smart chickpea, cowpea and              402              777              806                 ‐            1,985              359              555              576                 ‐            1,490                43              222              230                 ‐                495  pigeonpea production systems PL 6 Extra‐early chickpea and lentil varieties             335             648             672                ‐           1,655             299             463             480                 ‐           1,242               36             185             192                ‐               413  PL 7 Herbicide tolerant, machine‐harvestable              335              648              672                 ‐            1,655              299              463              480                 ‐            1,242                36              185              192                 ‐                413  chickpea, faba bean, lentil varieties PL 8 Hybrid pigeonpea             568         1,101         1,142                ‐           2,811             509             786             816                 ‐           2,111               59             315             326                ‐               700  CRP Management/Coordination             737                ‐                  ‐                  ‐               737               10                ‐                  ‐                   ‐                 10             727                ‐                  ‐                  ‐               727  Gender Strategies             101             194             202                ‐               497               90             138             143                 ‐               371               11               56               59                ‐               126       Total – all Costs         4,087          6,476          6,719                 ‐         17,282          3,002          4,626          4,799                 ‐         12,427          1,085          1,850          1,920                 ‐            4,855  Anuual Budget (a) Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget IITA  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  PL 1 Drought and low‐phosphorus tolerant          1,263              994              698                 ‐            2,955              726              516              677                 ‐            1,919              537              478                21                 ‐            1,036  common bean, cowpea and soybean PL2  Heat tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    bean and lentil PL 3 Short‐duration, drought tolerant and                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    aflatoxin‐free groundnut PL 4 High nitrogen‐fixing chickpea, common              851              312          1,090                 ‐            2,253              527              148          1,099                 ‐            1,774              324              164                 (9)                ‐               479  bean, faba bean and soybean PL 5 Insect‐smart chickpea, cowpea and              586              158              493                 ‐            1,237              398                86              361                 ‐               845              188                72              132                 ‐               392  pigeonpea production systems PL 6 Extra‐early chickpea and lentil varieties                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    PL 7 Herbicide tolerant, machine‐harvestable                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    chickpea, faba bean, lentil varieties PL 8 Hybrid pigeonpea                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    CRP Management/Coordination                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    Gender Strategies             180               40             120                ‐               340             172               32             117                 ‐               321                 8                 8                 3                ‐                 19        Total – all Costs          2,880          1,504          2,401                 ‐            6,785          1,823              782          2,254                 ‐            4,859          1,057              722              147                 ‐            1,926  Templates for CRP Reporting Report L131 Report Description L131 Name of Report CRP Themes Report (by Center, and Funding Source) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Anuual Budget (a) Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget GCP  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  PL 1 Drought and low‐phosphorus tolerant                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    common bean, cowpea and soybean PL2  Heat tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    bean and lentil PL 3 Short‐duration, drought tolerant and                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    aflatoxin‐free groundnut PL 4 High nitrogen‐fixing chickpea, common                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    bean, faba bean and soybean PL 5 Insect‐smart chickpea, cowpea and                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    pigeonpea production systems PL 6 Extra‐early chickpea and lentil varieties                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    PL 7 Herbicide tolerant, machine‐harvestable                 ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    chickpea, faba bean, lentil varieties PL 8 Hybrid pigeonpea                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    CRP Management/Coordination                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐    Gender Strategies                ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                   ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐                  ‐         Total – all Costs                ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐    Anuual Budget (a) Actual Expenses ‐ This year Unspent Budget Summary Report ‐ by Theme  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  Windows    Window      Bilateral   Center   Total  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  1 & 2  3  funding  funds  Funding  PL 1 Drought and low‐phosphorus tolerant          2,126              994          4,021                 ‐            7,141          1,514              516          3,134                 ‐            5,164              612              478              887                 ‐            1,977  common bean, cowpea and soybean PL2  Heat tolerant chickpea, common bean, faba              919              734          1,358                 ‐            3,011              774              514              800                 ‐            2,088              145              220              558                 ‐                923  bean and lentil PL 3 Short‐duration, drought tolerant and          1,173          2,267          2,352                 ‐            5,791          1,049          1,619          1,680                 ‐            4,348              124              648              672                 ‐            1,443  aflatoxin‐free groundnut PL 4 High nitrogen‐fixing chickpea, common          1,648              581          2,792                 ‐            5,021          1,194              338          1,993                 ‐            3,525              454              243              799                 ‐            1,496  bean, faba bean and soybean PL 5 Insect‐smart chickpea, cowpea and          1,114          1,000          1,364                 ‐            3,478              824              691              937                 ‐            2,452              290              309              427                 ‐            1,026  pigeonpea production systems PL 6 Extra‐early chickpea and lentil varieties             798              713         1,388                ‐           2,899             680             517             945                 ‐           2,142             118             196             443                ‐               757  PL 7 Herbicide tolerant, machine‐harvestable              747              726          1,249                 ‐            2,722              651              514              607                 ‐            1,772                96              212              642                 ‐                950  chickpea, faba bean, lentil varieties PL 8 Hybrid pigeonpea             568          1,101         1,142                ‐           2,811             509             786             816                 ‐           2,111               59             315             326                ‐               700  CRP Management/Coordination             737                 ‐                  ‐                  ‐               737               10                ‐                  ‐                   ‐                 10             727                ‐                  ‐                  ‐               727  Gender Strategies             281              234             322                ‐               837             262             170             260                 ‐               692               19               64               62                ‐               145       Total – all Costs       10,111          8,349        15,987                 ‐         34,447          7,467          5,665        11,172                 ‐         24,304          2,644          2,684          4,815                 ‐         10,143  Report Description L201 Report L201 Name of Report CRP Financial Report ‐ Bilateral Grants  (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months CRP Nr Grain legumes Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Expenditure Total All CRP  Actual Expenses this  Annual Budget Variance Year Window 3 Australia                                    41                                    41                                  ‐ Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation                              5,973                              4,440                              1,533 CHINA                                     55                                    40                                    15 European Commission                                  880                                  627                                 2  53 India                                  328                                  216                                  112 USAID                                   908                                  289                                  619 Zambia Aflatoxin Research & Mitigation                                   164                                    12                                  152 Sub total                              8,349                              5,665                              2,684 Bilateral AATF                                     11                                    (7)                                    18 AFESD                                     84                                    24                                    60 African Wildlife Foundation                                     10                                      5                                      5 Aga Khan Foundation                                        4                                      3                                      1 AGRA                                      43                                    31                                    12 ARC                                     23                                      4                                    19 ASARECA                                      14                                    10                                      4 Australia                                   401                                  116                                  285 AVRDC                                     36                                    36                                  ‐ BBSRC                                     75                                    24                                    51 Belgium                                   ‐                                      1                                    (1) Canada                                     60                                    54                                      6 CARE, Malawi                                      10                                      7                                      3 European Commission                                  799                                  283                                  516 CFC                                   301                                  289                                    12 CGIAR                                     12                                      2                                    10 CIAT                                   245                                  191                                    55 CIDA                               1,874                              1,690                                  184 CIMMYT                                   213                                  152                                    61 CIP                                     20                                    21                                    (1) CORAF/WECARD                                     25                                    21                                      4 FAO                                      74                                    53                                    21 FARA, Ghana                                      80                                    57                                    23 Fiduciaria Bogota                                     67                                    18                                    49 GCP                               1,573                              1,038                                  535 Graduate Fellowship training                                       4                                      2                                      2 ICRISAT                                   922                                  549                                  373 IER, Mali                                        3                                      2                                      1 IFAD                                   389                                  270                                  119 IFPRI                                       8                                      1                                      7 IITA                                     91                                    90                                      1 ILRI                                     45                                    32                                    13 India                                2,348                              1,677                                  671 IRAN                                   107                                    14                                    93 IRELAND                                    570                                  407                                  163 ISDB                                       8                                    10                                    (2) Japan                                   180                                  168                                    12 JIRCAS                                     58                                    51                                      7 Kuwait Fund                                     63                                    15                                    48 McKnight                                   368                                  212                                  156 Netherlands                                  216                                  122                                    94 Nigeria                                     39                                    24                                    15 OFID                                   119                                    82                                    37 OSAKA                                       9                                      5                                      4 PHILLIPPINES                                    133                                    95                                    38 Portugal                                     38                                    16                                    22 PURDUE University                                     92                                    87                                      5 SDC                                   937                                  588                                  349 SWITZERLAND                                      11                                      8                                      3 Tottori University                                     16                                  ‐                                    16 UF                                     53                                    18                                    35 UNIDO                                   ‐                                      0                                    (0) University of Saskatchewan                                     34                                    10                                    24 USAID                               2,328                              1,793                                  535 Wegeningen university                                   744                                  702                                    42 Sub total                            15,987                            11,172                              4,814 Totals for CRP                          24,336                          16,837                              7,498 Expenditure CIAT  Actual Expenses this  Annual Budget Variance Year Window 3 Donor 1                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Donor 2                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Sub total                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Bilateral McKnight                                   235                                  117                                  118 GCP                                  401                                  201                                  200 Fiduciaria Bogota                                    67                                    18                                    49 UF                                    53                                    18                                    35 IRAN                                  107                                    14                                    93 IITA                                    91                                    90                                      1 BBSRC                                    75                                    24                                    51 CIDA                              1,874                              1,690                                  184 SDC                                  937                                  588                                  349 CIP                                    20                                    21                                    (1) ICRISAT                                  893                                  520                                  373 USAID                                  223                                    79                                  144 Sub total                              4,976                              3,380                              1,596 Totals for CRP                            4,976                            3,380                              1,596 Report Description L201 Report L201 Name of Report CRP Financial Report ‐ Bilateral Grants  (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months CRP Nr Grain legumes Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Expenditure ICARDA  Actual Expenses this  Annual Budget Variance Year Window 3 India                                  328                                  216                                  112 Australia                                    41                                    41                                  ‐ Sub total                                  369                                  257                                  112 Bilateral AFESD                                    84                                    24                                    60 Australia                                  401                                  116                                  285 CGIAR                                    12                                      2                                    10 ARC                                    23                                      4                                    19 European Commission                                  687                                  203                                  484 CIAT                                  239                                  190                                    49 IFAD                                  103                                    66                                    37 IFPRI                                      8                                      1                                      7 ISDB                                      8                                    10                                    (2) Kuwait Fund                                    63                                    15                                    48 OFID                                  119                                    82                                    37 Portugal                                    38                                    16                                    22 Netherlands                                    56                                  ‐                                    56 University of Saskatchewan                                    34                                    10                                    24 Tottori University                                    16                                  ‐                                    16 Sub total                            1,891                                739                              1,152 Totals for CRP                            2,260                                996                              1,264 Expenditure ICRISAT  Actual Expenses this  Annual Budget Variance Year Window 3 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation                              5,367                              3,834                              1,533 CHINA                                     55                                    40                                    15 European Commission                                  880                                  627                                  253 USAID                                   174                                  125                                    49 Sub total                              6,476                              4,626                              1,850 Bilateral Aga Khan Foundation                                       4                                      3                                      1 AGRA                                     43                                    31                                    12 ASARECA                                     14                                    10                                      4 CANADA                                     11                                      8                                      3 CARE, Malawi                                     10                                      7                                      3 CIMMYT                                  175                                  125                                    50 European Commission                                  112                                    80                                    32 FAO                                     74                                    53                                    21 FARA, Ghana                                     80                                    57                                    23 GCP                               1,172                                  837                                  335 IER, Mali                                       3                                      2                                      1 IFAD                                   286                                  204                                    82 India                               2,348                              1,677                                  671 IRELAND                                   570                                  407                                  163 McKnight                                   133                                    95                                    38 NETHERLANDS                                     99                                    71                                    28 PHILLIPPINES                                   133                                    95                                    38 SWITZERLAND                                     11                                      8                                      3 USAID                               1,441                              1,029                                  412 Sub total                              6,719                              4,799                              1,920 Totals for CRP                          13,195                            9,425                              3,770 Expenditure IITA  Actual Expenses this  Annual Budget Variance Year Window 3 Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation                                 6  06                                  606                                  ‐ Zambia Aflatoxin Research & Mitigation                                   164                                    12                                  152 USAID                                  734                                  164                                  570 Sub total                              1,504                                  782                                  722 Bilateral AATF                                    11                                    (7)                                    18 Belgium                                  ‐                                      1                                    (1) Canada                                    49                                    46                                      3 CFC                                  301                                  289                                    12 Japan                                  180                                  168                                    12 Netherland                                    61                                    51                                    10 Nigeria                                    39                                    24                                    15 USAID                                  664                                  685                                  (21) PURDUE University                                    92                                    87                                      5 Wegeningen university                                  744                                  702                                    42 OSAKA                                      9                                      5                                      4 AVRDC                                    36                                    36                                  ‐ ILRI                                    45                                    32                                    13 JIRCAS                                    58                                    51                                      7 UNIDO                                  ‐                                      0                                    (0) CORAF/WECARD                                    25                                    21                                      4 African Wildlife Foundation                                    10                                      5                                      5 CIAT                                      6                                      1                                      6 CIMMYT                                    38                                    27                                    11 ICRISAT                                    29                                    29                                  ‐ Graduate Fellowship training                                      4                                      2                                      2 Sub total                              2,401                              2,254                                  147 Totals for CRP                            3,905                            3,036                                  869 Report Description L201 Report L201 Name of Report CRP Financial Report ‐ Bilateral Grants  (by Center) Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months CRP Nr Grain legumes Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Expenditure GCP  Actual Expenses this  Annual Budget Variance Year Window 3 Donor 1                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Sub total                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Bilateral Donor 1                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Sub total                                  ‐                                  ‐                                  ‐ Totals for CRP                                ‐                                ‐                                  ‐ Report Description L211 Report L211 Name of Report: CRP Grain legumes : Partnerships Report Reporting Line: Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period: Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Annual Budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This Year Unspent Budget Windows   Window     Bilateral   Center  indow     Bilateral   Center  Windows   Window     Bilateral   Center  Center Institute Country Total  Windows   W Total Total 1 & 2  3  funding  Funds  1 & 2  3  funding  Funds  1 & 2  3  funding  Funds  CIAT Selian Agricultural Research Institute ‐ SARI Tanzania, United Republic Of              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                (1)              ‐                 (1) Agricultural Research Institute  ‐ ARI UYOLE Tanzania, United Republic Of              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  8                  8              ‐              ‐                (8)              ‐                 (8) Southern Agricultural Research Institute ‐ SARI Ethiopia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  4                  4              ‐              ‐                (4)              ‐                 (4) Kenya Agricultural Research Institute ‐ KARI Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                (6)              ‐                 (6) Farm Concern International ‐ FCI Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) Kenya Agricultural Research Institute ‐ KARI Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  7                  7              ‐              ‐                (7)              ‐                 (7) Southern Agricultural Research Institute ‐ SARI Ethiopia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               20               20              ‐              ‐              (20)              ‐               (20) DR&SS ‐ The Department of Research and Specialist Services  in the Ministry of Agriculture, Mechanisation and Irrigation  Zimbabwe Development                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                   4                   4                ‐                ‐                  (4)                ‐                  (4) UFCS ‐ Uriri Farmers Cooperative Society  Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                (1)              ‐                 (1) Appropriate Rural Development Agriculture Programme ‐  Kenya ARDAP                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                 20                 20                ‐                ‐                (20)                ‐                (20) Butere District Federaation of Soybean Farmers Groups ‐  Kenya BUFESOFAG                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                ‐                   1                   1                ‐                ‐                  (1)                ‐                  (1) ISABU Burundi: Ecabren  Burundi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               12               12              ‐              ‐              (12)              ‐               (12) PNL‐INERA Mulungu DRC: Ecabren  Mulungu               ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) Fofifa Madagascar: Ecabren  Madagascar              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                (6)              ‐                 (6) EIAR Melkasa: Ecabren  Melkasa              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               14               14              ‐              ‐              (14)              ‐               (14) RAB Rwanda: Ecabren  Rwanda              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) NFNC Zambia: Sabrn ; Nutrition Activities Zambia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  7                  7              ‐              ‐                (7)              ‐                 (7) ARI‐Uyole Tanzania: Sabrn  Tanzania              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               23               23              ‐              ‐              (23)              ‐               (23) Malawi: Sabrn  Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               15               15              ‐              ‐              (15)              ‐               (15) IIAM Mozambique Sabrn Mozambique              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               22               22              ‐              ‐              (22)              ‐               (22) SARI Tanzania ‐ Ecabren  Nutrition Tanzania              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               12               12              ‐              ‐              (12)              ‐               (12) Swaziland: Sabrn  Swaziland              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  8                  8              ‐              ‐                (8)              ‐                 (8) ARC South Africa ‐ Sabrn South Africa              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               24               24              ‐              ‐              (24)              ‐               (24) Zambia: Sabrn Zambia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               31               31              ‐              ‐              (31)              ‐               (31) Zimbabwe: Sabrn Zimbabwe              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               31               31              ‐              ‐              (31)              ‐               (31) Angola: Sabrn  Angola              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               10               10              ‐              ‐              (10)              ‐               (10) Burkina Faso: Wecabren  Burkina              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               21               21              ‐              ‐              (21)              ‐               (21) INERA Burkina Faso: Wecabren  Burkina              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) ISABU‐Burundi: Ecabren  Burundi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               25               25              ‐              ‐              (25)              ‐               (25) Bambui Cameroon Cameroon              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               12               12              ‐              ‐              (12)              ‐               (12) Ekona Cameroon Cameroon              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               28               28              ‐              ‐              (28)              ‐               (28) Foumbot Cameroon Cameroon              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               20               20              ‐              ‐              (20)              ‐               (20) IRAD Cameroon Wecabren  Cameroon              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  9                  9              ‐              ‐                (9)              ‐                 (9) Nkolbisson Cameroon Cameroon              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               26               26              ‐              ‐              (26)              ‐               (26) ICRA Central Africa Republic ‐  Wecabren  Central Africa Republic              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) Central African Republic ‐  Wecabren  Central African Republic              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               30               30              ‐              ‐              (30)              ‐               (30) Congo Brazaville ‐  Wecabren  Congo              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               31               31              ‐              ‐              (31)              ‐               (31) INERA Kipopo: Lubumbashi ‐ Sabrn  Congo              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               28               28              ‐              ‐              (28)              ‐               (28) INERA‐Kipopo DR Congo ‐ Sabrn  Congo              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               14               14              ‐              ‐              (14)              ‐               (14) CRI Ghana: Wecabren  Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               26               26              ‐              ‐              (26)              ‐               (26) IRAG Guinea Conakry ‐ Wecabren  Guinea              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               38               38              ‐              ‐              (38)              ‐               (38) KARI Kakamega ‐ Ecabren Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                (6)              ‐                 (6) KARI‐Katumani ‐ Nutrition Activites Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               16               16              ‐              ‐              (16)              ‐               (16) Lesotho ‐ Sabrn  Lesotho              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               20               20              ‐              ‐              (20)              ‐               (20) FOFIFA Madagascar ‐ Ecabren Madagascar              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               10               10              ‐              ‐              (10)              ‐               (10) Malawi: Sabrn Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               23               23              ‐              ‐              (23)              ‐               (23) Mali ‐ Wecabren  Mali              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               26               26              ‐              ‐              (26)              ‐               (26) IFR/CRRA Mali ‐  Wecabren  Mali              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) Mozambique: Sabrn Mozambique              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               33               33              ‐              ‐              (33)              ‐               (33) RAB Rwanda ‐  Ecabren Rwanda              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               21               21              ‐              ‐              (21)              ‐               (21) Senegal: Wecabren  Senegal              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               41               41              ‐              ‐              (41)              ‐               (41) South Africa South Africa              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               36               36              ‐              ‐              (36)              ‐               (36) Swaziland Swaziland              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               12               12              ‐              ‐              (12)              ‐               (12) ARI‐Uyole Mbeya Tanzania              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               20               20              ‐              ‐              (20)              ‐               (20) SARI Tanzania ‐ Ecabren  Tanzania              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               18               18              ‐              ‐              (18)              ‐               (18) Report Description L211 Report L211 Name of Report: CRP Grain legumes : Partnerships Report Reporting Line: Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period: Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Annual Budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This Year Unspent Budget Southern Tanzania ‐ Sabrn  Tanzania              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               11               11              ‐              ‐              (11)              ‐               (11) Tanzania ‐  Sabrn Tanzania              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               17               17              ‐              ‐              (17)              ‐               (17) ITRA Togo ‐ Wecabren  Togo              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               36               36              ‐              ‐              (36)              ‐               (36) Mulungu DRC ‐  Ecabren Uganda              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               17               17              ‐              ‐              (17)              ‐               (17) NACCRI‐Uganda ‐  Ecabren Uganda              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               27               27              ‐              ‐              (27)              ‐               (27) Zambia: Sabrn  Zambia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               59               59              ‐              ‐              (59)              ‐               (59) Zimbabwe: Sabrn Zimbabwe              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               66               66              ‐              ‐              (66)              ‐               (66) KARI Embu: Ecabren Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                (6)              ‐                 (6) KARI Kisii: Ecabren Kenya              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                (6)              ‐                 (6) Sub‐total for center              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐         1,146         1,146              ‐              ‐        (1,146)              ‐         (1,146) ICARDA Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute Bangladesh              ‐              ‐               70              ‐               70                ‐               ‐               70               70              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ Nepal Agricultural Research Council Nepal              ‐              ‐               74               74               ‐               39               39              ‐              ‐               35              ‐                35 ICAR India              ‐               10               15               25                10               25               35              ‐              ‐              (10)              ‐               (10) IARI India              ‐               20               15               35                17               15               32              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3 INRA Morocco Morocco              ‐               20               80              ‐             100                ‐               ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               20               80              ‐              100 Sub‐total for center              ‐               50             254              ‐             304                ‐                27             149             176              ‐               23             105              ‐              128 ICRISAT BARC, Bangladesh Bangladesh              ‐              ‐                  6              ‐                  6                ‐                  4                  4              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 DGR, Junagadh India              ‐              ‐               13              ‐               13                  9                  9              ‐              ‐                  4              ‐                  4 TNAU, Coimbatore India              ‐              ‐               48              ‐               48               34               34              ‐              ‐               14              ‐                14 JAU, Junagadh India              ‐              ‐                  7              ‐                  7                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 ANGRAU, Hyderabad India              ‐              ‐                  7              ‐                  7                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 CIAT Tanzania              ‐              ‐               48              ‐               48               34               34              ‐              ‐               14              ‐                14 CIMMYT Tanzania              ‐              ‐               35              ‐               35               25               25              ‐              ‐               10              ‐                10 DRD, Tanzania Tanzania              ‐              ‐               13              ‐               13                  9                  9              ‐              ‐                  4              ‐                  4 DARS, Malawi Malawi              ‐              ‐                  8              ‐                  8                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 Zari, Zambia Zambia              ‐              ‐                  8              ‐                  8                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 BGI China             122              ‐              ‐              ‐             122               122              ‐             122              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ KARI India               30              ‐              ‐              ‐               30                 30              ‐               30              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ Sahabhagi Vikash Abhiyan India              ‐              ‐               10              ‐               10                  7                  7              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3 LOKSEBAK India              ‐              ‐                  9              ‐                  9                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK) India              ‐              ‐                  7              ‐                  7                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 People Forum India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Service (VAAS) Vietnam              ‐              ‐               34              ‐               34               24               24              ‐              ‐               10              ‐                10 Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF) India              ‐              ‐               34              ‐               34               24               24              ‐              ‐               10              ‐                10 National Agricultural Research Council (NARC) Nepal              ‐              ‐               34              ‐               34               24               24              ‐              ‐               10              ‐                10 Jharkhand Tribal Development Society (JTDS) India              ‐              ‐               25              ‐               25               18               18              ‐              ‐                  7              ‐                  7 Mitigating Poverty in Western Rajasthan (MPOWER) India              ‐              ‐               21              ‐               21               15               15              ‐              ‐                  6              ‐                  6 Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia Krishi Vishwa Vidyalaya (RKSKVV) India                ‐                ‐                 21                ‐                 21                 15                 15                ‐                ‐                   6                ‐                   6 The Bureau of Agricultural Research (BAR) Philippines              ‐              ‐               15              ‐               15               11               11              ‐              ‐                  4              ‐                  4 Nalendiele Research Station (NRS) Tanzania              ‐              ‐               54              ‐               54               38               38              ‐              ‐               15              ‐                15 ISRA Senegal              ‐              ‐               45              ‐               45               32               32              ‐              ‐               13              ‐                13 EIAR Ethiopia              ‐              ‐               82              ‐               82               58               58              ‐              ‐               23              ‐                23 North Carolina State University North Carolina              ‐              ‐               25              ‐               25               18               18              ‐              ‐                  7              ‐                  7 ISRA Senegal              ‐              ‐               23              ‐               23               16               16              ‐              ‐                  6              ‐                  6 JNKVV, JABALPUR India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 BHU, VARANASI India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 IARI, NEW DELHI India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 PAU, LUDHIANA India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 HAU, HISSAR India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 Tuskeqee University Malawi              ‐              ‐               75              ‐               75               54               54              ‐              ‐               21              ‐                21 NARI Tanzania              ‐               80              ‐              ‐               80                57              ‐               57              ‐               23              ‐              ‐                23 LZARDI Tanzania              ‐               80              ‐              ‐               80                57              ‐               57              ‐               23              ‐              ‐                23 NaSSARI Tanzania              ‐               80              ‐              ‐               80                57              ‐               57              ‐               23              ‐              ‐                23 NEGETTA Tanzania              ‐              ‐               80              ‐               80               ‐               57               57              ‐              ‐               23              ‐                23 Acharya N.G.Ranga Agricultural University (ANGRAU) India              ‐               28              ‐              ‐               28                20              ‐               20              ‐                  8              ‐              ‐                  8 University of Agricultural Sciences UAS (Dharwad)) India              ‐               22              ‐              ‐               22                16              ‐               16              ‐                  6              ‐              ‐                  6 University of Agricultural Sciences UAS (Raichur) India              ‐               14              ‐              ‐               14                10              ‐               10              ‐                  4              ‐              ‐                  4 University of Agricultural Sciences UAS (Bangalore) India              ‐                  7              ‐              ‐                  7                   5              ‐                  5              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2 Report Description L211 Report L211 Name of Report: CRP Grain legumes : Partnerships Report Reporting Line: Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period: Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Annual Budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This Year Unspent Budget Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU) India              ‐               36              ‐              ‐               36                25              ‐               25              ‐               10              ‐              ‐                10 Orissa India              ‐               38              ‐              ‐               38                27              ‐               27              ‐               11              ‐              ‐                11 BAU ‐ Bihar India              ‐               32              ‐              ‐               32                23              ‐               23              ‐                  9              ‐              ‐                  9 Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI) Bangladesh              ‐               35              ‐              ‐               35                25              ‐               25              ‐               10              ‐              ‐                10 International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA) Nigeria              ‐          1,447              ‐              ‐          1,447           1,033              ‐          1,033              ‐             413              ‐              ‐              413 Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) Colombia              ‐          1,103              ‐              ‐          1,103              788              ‐             788              ‐             315              ‐              ‐              315 EIAR ‐ Ethiopia Ehiopia              ‐               50              ‐              ‐               50                36              ‐               36              ‐               14              ‐              ‐                14 Egerton University   ‐ Kenya Kenya              ‐               36              ‐              ‐               36                26              ‐               26              ‐               10              ‐              ‐                10 IIAM ‐ Mozambique Mozambique              ‐               16              ‐              ‐               16                12              ‐               12              ‐                  5              ‐              ‐                  5 SARI Tanzania              ‐               31              ‐              ‐               31                22              ‐               22              ‐                  9              ‐              ‐                  9 IARI Tanzania              ‐               11              ‐              ‐               11                   8              ‐                  8              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3 NARI Tanzania              ‐               37              ‐              ‐               37                27              ‐               27              ‐               11              ‐              ‐                11 LZARDI‐UKIRIGURU Tanzania              ‐               46              ‐              ‐               46                33              ‐               33              ‐               13              ‐              ‐                13 Uganda (NaSARRI of NARO ) Uganda              ‐               38              ‐              ‐               38                27              ‐               27              ‐               11              ‐              ‐                11 Uganda ( Ngetta ZARDI) Uganda              ‐               76              ‐              ‐               76                54              ‐               54              ‐               22              ‐              ‐                22 WCA ‐ Burkina Faso              ‐               16              ‐              ‐               16                12              ‐               12              ‐                  5              ‐              ‐                  5 WCA ‐ EUCORD, Mali Mali              ‐                  6              ‐              ‐                  6                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2 WCA ‐ IER Mali              ‐               10              ‐              ‐               10                   7              ‐                  7              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3 AOPP Mali Mali              ‐                  6              ‐              ‐                  6                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2 WAKROFO Mali Mali              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2                   1              ‐                  1              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 PLAN MALI ‐ FO Mali Mali              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2                   1              ‐                  1              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 SAHEL 21 ‐ FO Mali Mali              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2                   1              ‐                  1              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 WCA ‐ FASOKABA, Mali: Mali              ‐                  5              ‐              ‐                  5                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 WCA ‐ IAR Nigeria: Nigeria              ‐               10              ‐              ‐               10                   7              ‐                  7              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3 WCA ‐ INRAN Nigeria              ‐               19              ‐              ‐               19                13              ‐               13              ‐                  5              ‐              ‐                  5 WADACHE de HANKOURA, Niger Niger              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3                   2              ‐                  2              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 ARUNA DA DUNIA, Niger Niger              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3                   2              ‐                  2              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 GANI YAKORI JI‐FO, Niger Niger              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3                   2              ‐                  2              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 WCA ‐ JARDA, Nigeria Nigeria              ‐                  6              ‐              ‐                  6                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2 WCA ‐ GSRDI, Nigeria Nigeria              ‐                  5              ‐              ‐                  5                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                  1              ‐              ‐                  1 WCA ‐KTARDA: Nigeria              ‐               11              ‐              ‐               11                   8              ‐                  8              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3 WCA ‐KNARDA: Nigeria              ‐               11              ‐              ‐               11                   8              ‐                  8              ‐                  3              ‐              ‐                  3 Ghana ‐SARI Nigeria              ‐               20              ‐              ‐               20                14              ‐               14              ‐                  6              ‐              ‐                  6 Senegal ‐ ISRA Nigeria              ‐                  8              ‐              ‐                  8                   6              ‐                  6              ‐                  2              ‐              ‐                  2 PANJAB University Chandigarh              ‐              ‐                  6              ‐                  6                  4                  4              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 SOKINE UNIVERSITY Tanzania              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 DRD Tanzania              ‐              ‐               32              ‐               32               23               23              ‐              ‐                  9              ‐                  9 NASFAM Malawi              ‐              ‐                  7              ‐                  7                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2 ARS-AnanthapuR India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 AF-Ananthapur India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 ARS Nandyal India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 ARS Tandur India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 JTDS-Ranchi India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 UAS-Dharwad India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 ARS-Gulbarga India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 OTELP-Bhubhan India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 JNKVV-Jabal India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 RVSKVV-Gwalior India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 TNAU-Coimbat India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 ARS-Tindivanam India              ‐              ‐                  2              ‐                  2                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                  0              ‐                  0 BAU-Ranchi India              ‐              ‐                  3              ‐                  3                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                  1              ‐                  1 Sub‐total for center             152         3,487             868              ‐         4,507               152          2,491             620         3,263              ‐             996             248              ‐          1,244 IITA Borno State Agric Development Project (BOSADP) Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                (4)              ‐              ‐                 (4) College of Agriculture & Natural Resource Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐             129             129              ‐              ‐            (129)              ‐            ( 129) Association of Church Development Project (ACDEP) Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               12               12              ‐              ‐              (12)              ‐               (12) Centro Internacional De Agricultura Tropical (CIAT) Colombia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               20               20              ‐              ‐              (20)              ‐               (20) ICRISAT Colombia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               20               20              ‐              ‐              (20)              ‐               (20) Compte Resources (INRAN) Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  2                  2              ‐              ‐                (2)              ‐                 (2) Dedza DADO Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                (1)              ‐                 (1) DAES Salima Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                (1)              ‐                 (1) DAO Lilongwe Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                (1)              ‐                 (1) Report Description L211 Report L211 Name of Report: CRP Grain legumes : Partnerships Report Reporting Line: Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period: Every 6 months Period               01 July 2012 ‐ 31 December 2012 Annual Budget  Actual Expenses ‐ This Year Unspent Budget DARS Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               14               14              ‐              ‐              (14)              ‐               (14) Agricultural Development (DFID) Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   9              ‐                  9              ‐                (9)              ‐              ‐                 (9) Urban Agricultural Network Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  3                  3              ‐              ‐                (3)              ‐                 (3) Institute of Agricultural Research (IAR) Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               22               22              ‐              ‐              (22)              ‐               (22) IKURU SARL Mozambique              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  1                  1              ‐              ‐                (1)              ‐                 (1) INERA Station De Saria Saria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   3               26               29              ‐                (3)              (26)              ‐               (29) Kaduna State Agricultural Development Project (KADP) Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  8                  8              ‐              ‐                (8)              ‐                 (8) University of Agriculture, Makurdi Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   9              ‐                  9              ‐                (9)              ‐              ‐                 (9) National Cereals Research Institute (NCRI) Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   5              ‐                  5              ‐                (5)              ‐              ‐                 (5) SARI Pronaf Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   4              ‐                  4              ‐                (4)              ‐              ‐                 (4) Sasakawa Global 2000 Congo              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               17               17              ‐              ‐              (17)              ‐               (17) Soil Research Institute (SRI) Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               15               15              ‐              ‐              (15)              ‐               (15) IER Mali              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   8              ‐                  8              ‐                (8)              ‐              ‐                 (8) Savana Agricultural Research Institute (SARI) Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               25               25              ‐              ‐              (25)              ‐               (25) Bayero University, Kano Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  6                  6              ‐              ‐                (6)              ‐                 (6) Kano Agriculture Research Dev. Agency (KNARDA) Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   5                  5              ‐                (5)              ‐              ‐                 (5) Zona Cordinator Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                   7                  7              ‐                (7)              ‐              ‐                 (7) Universiteit Gent Belgium              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                22               22              ‐              (22)              ‐              ‐               (22) Dev Alternative Inc Zambia              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                20              ‐               20              ‐              (20)              ‐              ‐               (20) World Vission Malawi              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) UNP of Envangelica Presbytarian Dev. Relief Agency Church Ghana              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  4                  4              ‐              ‐                (4)              ‐                 (4) Reagent of the University of Califonia USA              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  4                  4              ‐              ‐                (4)              ‐                 (4) Federal Reserve Bank of Newyork USA              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               12               12              ‐              ‐              (12)              ‐               (12) Universiteit Laval Canada              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐               36               36              ‐              ‐              (36)              ‐               (36) Federal University of Technology, Minna Nigeria              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐                  5                  5              ‐              ‐                (5)              ‐                 (5) Sub‐total for center              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                96             388             484              ‐              (96)            (388)              ‐            ( 484) GCP P1              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ P2              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ Sub‐total for center              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ Summary Report ‐ by CG Center Windows   Window     Bilateral   Center  Total  Windows   Window     Bilateral   Center  Total Windows   Window     Bilateral   Center  Total 1 & 2  3  funding  Funds  1 & 2  3  funding  Funds  1 & 2  3  funding  Funds  Summary CIAT              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐          1,146              ‐          1,146              ‐              ‐        (1,146)              ‐         (1,146) ICARDA              ‐               50             254              ‐             304                ‐                27             149              ‐             176              ‐               23             105              ‐              128 ICRISAT             152          3,487             868              ‐          4,507               152           2,491             620              ‐          3,263              ‐             996             248              ‐          1  ,244 IITA              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐                96             388              ‐             484              ‐              (96)            (388)              ‐            ( 484) GCP              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐                ‐               ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐              ‐               ‐ Total ‐ all centers               152           3,537           1,122                ‐           4,811               152           2,614           2,303                ‐           5,069                ‐               923          (1,181)                ‐             ( 258) Templates for CRP Reporting Report L401 Report Description Name of Report CRP Funding Statement, Windows 1 and 2  Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 3 months PART 1 ‐ REPORT OF LEAD CENTER Opening Balance ‐ 1 July 2012                   ‐ W1 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates)                   ‐ Total Receipts                   ‐                   ‐ W2 Receipts from Consortium Office (actual dates)                   ‐                   ‐ Total Receipts                   ‐                   ‐ Transfers to CG Partners CIAT                   ‐ ICARDA                   ‐ IITA                   ‐ GCP                   ‐ ICRISAT                   ‐ Total Disbursements                   ‐ Expenditure by Lead Center  (ICRISAT)              3,002 Unliquidated Advances to ICRISAT Partners                   ‐ Funds held ‐ end of Period              3,002 PART 2 ‐ REPORT OF CGIAR PARTNERS Unliquidated  Center Funds held ‐  Transfers from  Funds held ‐  Expenditure Advances to  start of Period Lead Center end of Period Partners CIAT                   ‐                   ‐               1,407                    ‐              1,407 ICARDA                   ‐                   ‐               1,235                    ‐              1,235 IITA                   ‐                   ‐               1,823                    ‐              1,823 GCP                   ‐                   ‐                   ‐                    ‐                   ‐ Totals                   ‐                   ‐               4,465                    ‐              4,465 Notes All figures illustrative only  Amounts should be reported in USD 000's Report is for each financial year. Quarterly Reports during year are on a cumulative basis. Report Description Report L411 Name of Report CRP Funding Statement, Window 2  Reporting Line Lead Center Report to Consortium Office Frequency/Period Every 6 months Date Donor Currency USD Year 1 ‐ 2011 Receipts from Donors             ‐ Transfers to Lead Center (via CO) (if applicable) Other Disbursments CSP paid to Window 1 Funds held by Trustee ‐ end of Period             ‐ Year 2 ‐ 2012 Receipts from Donors             ‐ Transfers to Lead Center (via CO) Other Disbursments Funds held by Trustee ‐ end of Period             ‐ Notes