Proper citation: IRRI Vietnam Office. 2022. Inception Workshop of the CGIAR Initiative on Securing the Food Systems of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate and Livelihood Resilience. Proceedings. Hanoi, Vietnam: International Rice Research Institute (IRRI). ©2022 CGIAR Initiative on Securing the Food Systems of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate and Livelihood Resilience (AMD) Creative Commons License This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial–NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License. Articles appearing in this publication may be freely quoted and reproduced provided the source is acknowledged. No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purposes. DISCLAIMER: This publication has been prepared under the AMD Initiative and has not been peer reviewed. Any opinions stated herein are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the policies or opinions of AMD, donor agencies, or partners. All images remain the sole property of their source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission of the source. INCEPTION WORKSHOP Securing the Food Systems of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate and Livelihood Resilience PROCEEDINGS Can Tho City, Vietnam | 28-29 June 2022 #AsianDeltasInitiative Table of Contents List of Abbreviation 1 About the Workshop 2 Opening Program 3 Country priorities and statement of support and expectations 5 from the partner countries Overview of CGIAR Initiative on Securing the Food Systems of 7 Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate and Livelihood Resilience Workshop Activity (Getting to know each other) 10 Plenary Session with national agencies on the implementation 12 of the AMD Initiative Breakout Session 1 (Challenges, Gaps, and Opportunities) 15 Challenges and opportunities of scaling natural resources and 17 agriculture initiatives in Asia Plenary Session with International Organizations on the 18 implementation of the AMD Initiative Breakout Session 2 (Scaling the AMD initiative) 21 Breakout Session 3 (Work Planning) 23 Conclusions and Next Steps 26 List of Participants 28 Workshop Agenda 30 Media Releases 33 i List of Abbreviation 1M5R 1 Must 5 Reductions 3R3G Three Reductions, Three Gains ABC Alliance of Bioversity International and International Center for Tropical Agriculture ADB Asian Development Bank AMD Securing the Food Systems of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate and Livelihood Resilience ANR agriculture and natural resources ASEAN Association of Southeast Asian Nations AWD alternate wetting and drying CARDI Cambodian Agricultural Research and Development Institute CC climate change CCA climate change adaptation CFR Community Fish Refuge CIGs Common Interest Groups CIMMYT International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center CIP International Potato Center COP Conference of the Parties CS-MAP Climate-Smart Mapping and Adaptation Planning CSA climate-smart agriculture DALYs Disability-adjusted life years DARD Department of Agriculture and Rural Development DCAS+ digital climate advisory and bundled services DCP Department of Crop Production FA focus area FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FFPI FAO Food Price index FOCUS Farmer Options for Crops under Saline conditions GIC Green Innovation Centre GSLR global sea level rise IAE Institute of Agricultural Environment IFAD International Fund for Agricultural Development IMPP Improving Market Participation of the Poor INDC intended nationally determined contribution IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IRRI International Rice Research Institute IWMI International Water Management Institute KAP knowledge, attitude and practice LA learning alliances LED low emissions development MARD Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development MCRP Mekong Delta Climate Resilience Programme MDI Mekong Delta Development Research Institute MRD Mekong River Delta NAP National Adaptation Plan NDC Nationally Determined Contribution PMU program management unit PPP Public-Private Partnership PSAV Partnership for Sustainable Agriculture in Viet Nam RUA Royal University of Agriculture SCGs savings and credit groups SDGs Sustainable Development Goals SWOT strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNFSS UN Food Systems Summit USD US dollar VnSAT Vietnam Sustainable Agriculture Transformation 1 About the Workshop Workshop objectives Home to 177 million people, 36% of them The inception workshop aimed to: poor, the Asian Mega-Deltas are biodiverse, fertile, and productive food baskets dominated 1. Provide a venue for open discussion between by rice, fisheries, and aquaculture that support the research team and stakeholders on the millions within and beyond the deltas. However, initiative’s plans and programs; deltaic food systems are hit by serious impacts 2. Co-design specific work plans for Cambodia of climate change, including more frequent and Vietnam for each of the Focus Areas and more intense floods, salinization, water (FA); shortages, and climate extremes that will slow 3. Build crucial partnerships for research down economic growth, further erode food and activities and scaling, both national agencies nutrition security, exacerbate urbanization and and international organizations; and migration challenges, and trigger new poverty 4. Officially launch the initiative and promote traps and emerging hotspots of hunger. it to a wider audience through various channels. To address these urgent concerns, the CGIAR, together with its centers and development More than 80 participants attended the event partners, is officially launching the Securing the representing the government agencies of Food Systems of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate Vietnam and Cambodia; CGIAR and its centers and Livelihood Resilience (AMD). This Initiative working for AMD, such as the Alliance of aims to create resilient, inclusive, and productive Bioversity and CIAT, International Potato Center, deltas — which maintain socio-ecological International Maize and Wheat Improvement integrity, adapt to climatic and other stressors, Center, International Rice Research Institute, and support human prosperity and wellbeing International Water Management Institute, and — by removing systemic barriers to the scaling WorldFish; international organizations working of transformative technologies and practices at in the region, particularly in the Mekong Delta; community, national, and regional levels. academic institutions; private sector; and other relevant stakeholders groups. This objective will be achieved through: • Adapting deltaic production systems • Nutrition-sensitive deltaic agrifood systems • De-risking delta-oriented value chains • Inclusive deltaic food-systems governance • Evidence-based delta development planning 2 Opening Program OPENING REMARKS partnerships. The participatory process employed fully in the previous CGIAR works Mr. Le Thanh Tung empowered the partners to take not only Deputy Director for South ownership but full responsibility of the Department of Crop Production programs. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, • He encouraged the participants, Vietnam representing the different stakeholders, to participate actively in the workshop and to In his opening remarks, Mr. Tung acknowledged take the opportunity to give the AMD team the distinguished guests and participants of the the necessary ideas and feedback to make workshop, particularly the high-level government the initiative truly responsive to the needs officials from Cambodia and Vietnam. Some of of the smallholder farmers and the other the highlights of his message are: marginalized sectors in the deltas. • For more than 50 years, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD) of Vietnam and its attached agencies have been actively working with the CGIAR and its centers. Aligning with MARD’s and Vietnam government’s priorities, CGIAR science and innovations contributed to the creation of an enabling environment that supports the promotion of agricultural development in the country. • AMD is expected to be one of the new platforms for continuing the harmonious working relationship between MARD and CGIAR and carrying on the learnings from previous collaborations, like the value of stakeholders’ participation and empowerment in research for development work. • He hoped that AMD should continue to nurture, and even expand, Vietnam-CGIAR 3 Mr. Tran Thai Nghiem Deputy Director General Department of Agriculture and Rural Development of Can Tho City Mr. Nghiem officially welcomed all the participants to Can Tho City: WELCOME MESSAGES • Can Tho City plays an important role in agricultural production and development of Dr. Stephan Weise food systems for the whole region as well as Managing Director - Asia the whole country. Alliance of Bioversity International and • Like other localities in the Mekong River Delta International Center for Tropical Agriculture (MRD), agricultural production in Can Tho in the coming time will face many difficulties On behalf of Dr. Jean Balié, Regional Director due to adverse market fluctuations as well for Southeast Asia and the Pacific for CGIAR, Dr. as environmental impacts and increasingly Weise gave a welcome message providing a brief extreme climate change. Besides the risks due overview of CGIAR and a glimpse of how to work to the small scale of agricultural production together as a unified organization to create and and the limited production, there are also foster better opportunities for the region’s agri- limitations in processing and preservation food sector transformation. Some key messages technology for some commodities. from his speech are: • This requires the agricultural sector to have long-term solutions and strategies • CGIAR’s ambition is to be a vibrant, to develop agriculture in the direction of a global organization and a global leader smart and sustainable agricultural economy, in agricultural science and innovation adapting to climate change and enhancing positioned to deliver across the 2030 added value. Sustainable Development Agenda. • He recognized the AMD Initiative to • In the unified CGIAR, scientific innovations help address these challenges and build for food, land, and water systems can be sustainable agriculture in the Mekong Delta deployed faster, at a larger scale, and at that maintains socio-ecological integrity. reduced cost, having greater impact where • Can Tho DARD committed to work closely they are needed the most. The new CGIAR with MARD, Mekong Delta provinces, CGIAR can also offer several advantages, namely: centers and other partners to develop and holistic approach; individual and collective implement the AMD Initiative to achieve the expertise, capabilities, resources, and set goals. networks; extensive network; scaling proven innovations; and strong presence in ASEAN. • He introduced the new 3-year CGIAR Initiatives, which is one of the three types of engagement within the CGIAR 2030 Research and Innovation Strategy. He enumerated the nine that are being implemented in Vietnam and four in Cambodia, plus the cross-cutting effort of breeding staple crops in both countries. • He encouraged the workshop participants to work collaboratively in planning the specific activities to have a more stakeholder- responsive AMD initiative. 4 Country priorities and statement of support and expectations from the partner countries VIETNAM and people health; infrastructure and logistic Dr. Nguyen Hong Son issue/processing; and market access. President • Country priorities in MRD: restructuring Vietnam Academy of Agricultural Sciences the rice sector; diversifying the rice cropping systems; rice land conversion for • MRD region accounts for 31.7% of the production of fruit trees or fisheries; the agricultural sector’s GDP. It contributes up rotation of rice-fisheries, particularly rice- to 50% of the country’s rice output, 65% of shrimp rotation; developing organic and aquaculture, and 70% of fruits. It also makes eco-sound production systems linkage with up 95 % of rice volume for export and 60 % rural tourism; strengthening conservation of fish volume for export. MRD is the biggest agriculture; and developing large farm and agricultural production hub of Vietnam with certification system. the mission to ensure national food security • Vietnam’s expectations from the AMD and export, creating jobs for 65% of people Initiative: improving land use effect and in the region. management; scaling up the application/ • MRD, is one of the regions hardest hit by adoption of climate-smart innovative the effects of climate change. The effects technologies and advanced-farming of climate change are now substantially practices; enhancing early warning and manifested in MRD, through sea level climate information to smallholders; rise in low lying areas at the mouth of the climate policies or strategies; decision- delta, increased rainfall, increased number support for targeting interventions in of extreme weather events, rising average climate-risk areas; more productivity due temperatures, and increased salinity to increased resilience to climate change; intrusion. evidence-based planning support to attract • Issues threatening the food security and international climate-financing; improved farmers’ livelihood: smallholder farmers information and knowledge dissemination; struggle to meet the increasing quality development of ecological, organic and demands, unorganized smallholder conservation agriculture; and product farmers have limited access to commodity quality improvement, certification and production, quality certification, and market access. markets; high intensive farming with high input is causing problem to the environment 5 CAMBODIA • CSA technologies and practices are being Dr. Chan Phaloeun applied already in the country, such as: Undersecretary of State stressed-tolerant varieties, direct-seeded Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries rice, less methane rice production practice, Integrated Pest Management, water-saving • Cambodia has been rice self-sufficient practices, greenhouse for horticulture, since 1995 with high rice production and conservation agriculture, and bio-energy exporting to 49 countries. Frequent flooding and renewable energy. and drought are affecting rice production. • Cambodia has also committed to UNCCD • To address the climate change impacts Decision to Combat Land Degradation to agriculture, the Royal Government of aiming to achieve land degradation Cambodia developed the long-term strategy neutrality in 2030 by promoting agro on carbon neutrality, and the Cambodian ecological technologies, commitment to strategic plan of action, and mainstreaming global soil organic carbon initiative, and climate change activity in relevant sectors. joining the regional network program on • Research and development agenda also agro-ecology and safety food transition, try to address climate change impact by such as Agroecology Alliance for Southeast developing technological innovations Asia and agro-ecology and food transition (climate-friendly technologies and practices) projects. and building resilience by carrying out • Dr. Chan expressed that Cambodia supports adaption and mitigation activities. and joins the implementation of the One • Cambodia also adopted and started applying CGIAR initiatives, particularly AMD. She the ASEAN Guidelines on the Promotion of congratulated and thanked IRRI Vietnam and Climate-Smart Agriculture Practices as well One CGIAR for hosting the AMD inception as the ASEAN Guidelines for Sustainable workshop. Agriculture to identify and prioritize the CSA approaches and practices and the climate- friendly technologies and innovations for the application in the agriculture and food production systems and value chains. 6 Overview of CGIAR Initiative on Securing the Food Systems of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate and Livelihood Resilience Dr. Björn Ole Sander • Importance of Asian Mega-Deltas. They Senior Climate Change Expert are the food basket for the country (i.e., Country Representative to Vietnam Irrawaddy: ~70% of rice and aquaculture; International Rice Research Institute Mekong: 54% rice, 60% fruits and 70% Initiative Leader, AMD seafood). More than 400 million people depend on the deltas, which are also hotspot • New IPCC sea-level rise projections stated of poverty and malnutrition. that global sea level rise (GSLR) by year 2100 • Several climatic risks affecting the deltas will reach 0.6m (RCP2.6) to 1.1m (RCP8.5) are: extreme precipitation, drought, salinity, (IPCC, 2019), compared to IPCC 2001’s tropical storm, sea-level rise, and extreme projection of 0.2-0.7m GSLR by 2100. heat. • Deltas are drowing. The Mekong Delta • The steps in the co-development of the AMD is much lower elevated than previously Initiative: demand mapping consultations in assumed, making it more vulnerable to sea- three deltas (2020, Two degree initiative); level rise. reviewers comments on Pre-Concept note • The challenges of the Asian Mega-Deltas: (May, 2021); interaction with other Initiatives - Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta (in Bangladesh and country representatives (June-August, and India) - ~ 53% of the coastal area affected 2021); validation of demand and value by salinity jeopardizing 7% of the national proposition with countries and investors rice production (Schneider & Asch, 2020); an (July-August 2021); proposal drafting estimated significant decrease (11%-30%) in (August-November 2021); proposal revision, the area suitable for agriculture. staffing, partner mapping (February-May - Irrawaddy Delta (in Myanmar) - Millions of 2022); and inception workshop. people may be displaced; dry season crop • The following are the measurable three- yield is estimated to be reduced by as much year outcomes to be achieved by 2025: as 40%, due to saline irrigation water (Asch 50,000 smallholders adapt and improve & Wopereis, 2001). management of 100,000 ha of land; - Mekong Delta (in Vietnam and Cambodia) reduce mortality, DALYs and micronutrient - A 0.5 meter rise in relative sea level would deficiencies, for 20,000 producers (80% inundate 37% of the MRD to a depth over women) and 100,000 consumers; climate 1m (Thao et al. 2014); Increased vulnerability services used by ≥800,000 smallholders; of rural poor and increased labor burden of at least three (3) national governments and women as urbanization increases (Ylipaa et partners co-design governance policies or al. 2019). strategies with marginalized actors; and 7 national governments and partners work deltaic production systems and reduce with AMD to design at least two (2) climate environmental footprints and climatic risks. policies, projects, and investment plans. This will be done by convening stakeholders • Contribution to the five CGIAR impact areas in learning alliances, providing technical during 2022-2030: nutrition - 1.5M people knowhow on land suitability and agronomy, (80% women) gain vitamin A adequacy, and enabling value chain development. DALYs, or lives saved; poverty - 400,000 people gain 50% permanent income increase; FOCUS AREA 2 175,000 exit poverty; gender - 4.7M women Nutrition-Sensitive Deltaic Agrifood Systems benefit from CGIAR innovations; impacts are gender-responsive to –transformative; Dr. Benjamin Belton climate - 17Mt CO2 reduction; 4.8M benefit Senior Scientist from climate adaptation; USD 1.8B in climate WorldFish adaptation investments; and environment - 2.6M ha under improved management. • The challenges specific to the focus area are: • AMD is co-designed with >400 participants; food systems are transforming extremely the process is aimed to support the creation rapidly; nutrition outcomes of changes in of resilient, inclusive, and productive deltas; production and consumption practices; and and built on partnerships and learnings inadequate knowledge. from the former CGIAR Research Programs • The focus area aims to ensure that deltaic and various bilateral projects in the focus food systems sustain and enhance nutrition regions. security equitably, in a context of rapid change. The first requirement of designing Brief Introduction appropriate nutrition sensitive interventions of the five AMD Focus Areas is to understand the characteristics of these systems and their socially differentiated FOCUS AREA 1 nutrition implications. Adapting Deltaic Production Systems FOCUS AREA 3 Dr. Sudhir Yadav De-risking Delta-oriented Value Chains Research Leader - Soil, Water and Environment Unit, Sustainable Impact through Rice-based Dr. Cornelis Swaans Systems, International Rice Research Institute Senior scientist/Regional Lead for Climate Action in Asia , Alliance of Bioversity International and • Specific challenges of the focus area include: International Center for Tropical Agriculture low profitability of agri-production system; decreasing trend of engagement in agri • Specific challenges are: increasing risks to sectors; and sustainability at stake. smallholders in variable delta-environments • The focus area aims to facilitate innovation as they strive to intensify under the effects of scaling to support resilient diversified climate change; lack of tailor-made products and services to reduce (climate) risks based 8 on user needs; low institutional capacity to deliver high quality digital climate advisory and bundled services (DCAS+); limited institutional collaboration among public and private sector; lack of sustainable financing of inclusive DCAS+, and insufficient mobilization of private sector investment to reach scale • The objective of the focus area is to reduce climate risks among smallholders (including women and youth) and facilitate investment in deltaic value chains through DCAS+. FOCUS AREA 4 FOCUS AREA 5 Inclusive deltaic food-systems governance Evidence-based Delta Development Planning Dr. Deepa Joshi Dr. Katherine Nelson Scientist Scientist International Water Management Institute International Rice Research Institute • The challenge: how to operationalize more • Specific challenges include: interconnections sustainable and inclusive food systems? between sea level rise, salinity, subsidence, • The objective is to facilitate more joined flooding, drought, changing livelihoods up agriculture, water and environment and changing demographics are complex governance for sustainable, climate resilient, interwoven ecological, social, and economic and inclusive food systems innovations. systems; lack of holistic assessments • The focus are plan to do: transdisciplinary makes sustainable and integrated planning analyses of bio-physical, political, economic extremely challenging; limited interaction and social barriers, risks and opportunities across sectors and from local actors, as well to integrated food systems (research); bring as a lack of financing and limited knowledge together key public, private, civil society of the tools and resources available, nor and grassroots actors to co-analyze (data, capacity to use tools to undertake a planning evidence) and co-design more sustainable, process. diverse and climate resilient food systems • The focus area aims to improve the interventions (approach); and identify key development of climate-resilient and drivers, brokers and incentives to ensure inclusive food systems in Asian Mega-Deltas system innovations (impact). through evidence-supported policy dialogue and strategic planning and investment. To close his presentation, Dr. Sander shared some of the future engagements of AMD, such as: • Support to AgriTechnica Asia Live (24-26 August 2022) • Co-organize water security conference (November 2022) • Define better the ‘niche’ for AMD with delta development context • Develop ‘plug-in’ opportunities for global initiatives to work within regional agri-food systems innovation systems 9 Workshop Activity • How to create an enabling environment Getting to know each other from production to healthy consumption? • Diet and nutrition are influenced by Aside from introducing the members of the focus production, so how to change the behavior area discussion to each other, the objective of the of producers. activity is also to get reactions and clarifications • Apply food balance sheet to ensure food from the participants on the AMD initiative based security. Food balance sheet from FAO and on presentation delivered by the AMD team. MARD are out of date, which needs to be updated for the whole country, especially Specific questions: in MRD region. Link the food balance sheet application for consumption and food waste 1. Getting to know the group member reduction, in food production, exportation • Name, designation, institution, country, strategy, and other related policy and expertise, (other relevant personal strategies. information)? • What indicators for nutrition and food • What are your previous and current security (i.e., micronutrient, diet quality, engagements with CGIAR? dietary diversity)? 2. What are your reactions/clarifications on • Put together food system transition, zero the AMD presentation? hunger, and nutrition sensitive approach strategy to ensure their contributions to In the plenary presentations, the five breakout AMD FA2 and to ensure enough nutrients groups presented the highlights of the for the people. discussions: Focus Area 3 Focus Area 1 • How AMD will deal with climate shocks • Interest in sharing and learning across — early warnings and digital tools should countries and focus areas on capacity be focused as well (e.g., in Myanmar, building, sustainability approach Bangladesh)? • How the academic institutions can be • AMD focuses on livelihoods but we need involved in the AMD? to pay attention that livelihoods are more • On technologies, there are interest in than production/value chains; it is about diversification, exporting, optimizing the people’s lives. Should focus on integrating cropping systems, by-products (i.e., rice more development dimension into the straw) initiative and make sure to produce tailored • Harmonizing quality standards information and added value to farmers. • Synergies; how to coordinate with other • Saline intrusion is a key challenge but initiatives in the deltas? difficult to predict. Farmers are not sure if rice and fruit trees (e.g., durian, coconut) Focus Area 2 can tolerant to which level of salinity (part • What commodities in the food system of thousand) and the variance of tolerance should be the focus of AMD? capacity of crops/trees at different growth • Which areas in the Mekong Delta region will stages. Therefore, it is difficult for farmers to be selected for the research activities and adapt and prepare before the extreme event why? (e.g., big loss in coconut farming in Ben Tre 10 due to saline intrusion). AMD should focus sectors, and academia can be a challenge on providing information about resilience and opportunity. of crops/trees to salinity in the various crop • Information gaps, specifically lack of growth stages. information sharing and transparency. Data • Mekong river water level is low resulting gaps on gender and climate vulnerabilities to more salinity intrusion. Other extreme of the marginalized sectors. weather events (i.e., storms, thunderstorm) • Focus heavily on agriculture. Involve other are not easy to forecast (it occurs in short important ministries, such as environment, time and at localized areas). Therefore, women affairs, economics and finance, there is a need to work on the on-time infrastructure planning, health, and water dissemination of information to farmers for resources. them to take appropriate action. • Two most important hazards in Cambodia Focus Area 5 are flood and drought, most low land are • Research needs: friendly technology rice production areas. There is a need (i.e., CSA, varieties that are high yielding, for information from the Meteorological stress tolerant, water saving technique, office about seasonal forecasts and the diversified crops, agricultural conservation development of capacity on translating practices); provision of early warning forecast information into advisory. Capacity system; cross-border information sharing; building efforts are needed for farmers and social-economics drivers; capacity building, technical staff to effectively disseminate and especially for young scientist; crop understand climate information. insurance, accessibility and usability of • There is a weak link among the scientist, information/technology to the community extension, and other relevant government level; feasibility study/tradeoff study; department, making knowledge transfer to urbanization; infrastructure; risk reduction farmers more difficult. Some suggestion to versus production maximization; and address the issue: increase applied research/ environmental impacts study in broader participatory research with extension staff scale/area. involvement to transfer knowledge to • Scientific evidence to convince policy makers farmers; consolidate all research outcomes; • Take into account priorities of the digitalization; and support in farmers’ government, e.g., climate change resilience, utilization of information. food system transformation • Not only focus on crop but also on fish • Review what have been done in previous and fish systems/intercropped rice-fish and projects and identify the need for future maintain production of fish in rice-fish. research. • The initiative needs more stakeholders with • Integrated Master Plan of Vietnam: does it different expertise. consult with Cambodia counterpart? • Delta planning mechanism: interconnecting Focus Area 4 of delta when developing plans; the delta is • The initiative is ambitious yet very relevant. the unit. • Coordination among IPs, ministries, private 11 Plenary Session with national agencies on the implementation of the AMD Initiative Five panelists from the governments of Cambodia emission factor, circular economic model and Vietnam were given five minutes each to for waste water, residue/solid waste, organic discuss the following guide questions: agriculture, mapping LED, and carbon. • IAE also assists MARD and provides local • What are the priority areas (short-term, governments the services/consultants to have medium-term, and/or long-term) of your sustainable agriculture by mainstreaming agency related to the Mekong Delta? NDC, green agriculture growth, organic • What are your agency’s existing programs agriculture, ecological agriculture, climate and activities to address food security change adaptations, Net-Zero, and 30% and climate and livelihood resilience in methane emission reduction (government the Mekong Delta? commitment in COP26). • IAE’s international cooperation framework Dr. Mai Van Trinh allows the institute to work with organizations Director like the One CGIAR by facilitating the sharing Institute of Agricultural Environment, Vietnam of advanced technology, data and other resources, and networks and connections. • Dr. Trinh shared the current activities of his institute, such as: assessment of the impact Dr. Nguyen Viet Khoa of climate change to agriculture production; Head of Training Department development of emission factor for rice, rice- National Agriculture Extension Center, Vietnam shrimp, rice lands conversion, AWD, 3R3G, 1M5R; development of agri-solar for land • Vietnam has the integrated and use optimization; and adaptation measures comprehensive extension system from the and mitigation options. national level to the village level. The country • He also shared the researches on: CS-MAP, has the biggest extension public services AWD suitability map, revise crop calendar in ASEAN in terms of number of extension on impacted soils, improve soil quality worker (about 40,000), half are working on and enhance adaptability, circular shrimp the local level, at least 3 extension workers wastewater, INDC, NDC, Green Growth per commune. strategy, Verifier for AgReSult, WB7, and • Vietnam government, particularly MARD, VnSAT. issued a new policy on extension focusing • The institute strategies aim toward a clean on capacity building, the national extension and sustainable agriculture. IAE main project, and the communication extension goal is to provide required technologies program. Also, to implement PPP extension and technical generators for the delta to program. overcome issues on: effective water and • Strategic areas on PPP extension program fertilizer use, reasonable crop systems and were outlined, such as: identifying the role of calendars, suitability of mitigation options, public, which is to provide policy and general 12 guidelines and to attract private sector • Cambodia’s updated NDC includes: the 2030 investments; developing the agriculture raw NDC Scenario the overall emission reduction material for domestic use and exporting, target is at 42% compared to 2030 BAU which entails the government to invest in Scenario; 33 priority mitigation actions in infrastructure, local extension improvement, the sectors of energy, waste, industry (IPPU), and building extension network; and transport, agriculture, building and the digitalization of extension services, to FOLU; 58 priority adaptation actions in the cooperate with different stakeholders on sectors of agriculture, coastal zones, energy, the utilization of IT for extension. human health, industry, infrastructure – including roads, buildings and urban land Ms. Vichetratha Khlok use planning, livelihoods, poverty and Deputy Director biodiversity, tourism and water resources; Department of Climate Change and 29 enabling actions to facilitate the Ministry of Environment, Cambodia NDC implementation were identified in the education, gender, governance, information, • The Royal Government of Cambodia knowledge sharing, and policy and planning. recognizes climate change as a major • To conclude, climate change negatively challenge to Cambodia’s efforts to develop impacts on Cambodia coastal zone, sustainably. The country is highly vulnerable provinces along the Mekong River. Policy to the climate change impacts, such as: and institutional arrangement are in place. severe floods, storms, droughts, increasing However, there are bottlenecks in terms temperatures, sea level rise, and changing of limited financial means to address the rainfall regimes. Also, due to its low adverse effects of climate change; limited adaptive capacity and high vulnerability of technology transfer and technical experts; its economy. mobilization of resources for the NDC • Rising sea levels will potentially impact implementation; participation of private coastal systems in a number of ways, sector investment; capacity building and including inundation, flood and storm awareness raising; youth involvement; damage, loss of wetlands, erosion, saltwater gender concerns; and close regional intrusion, and rising water tables. Will have collaboration. direct and indirect socioeconomic impacts on tourism, human settlements, agriculture, Dr. Mak Soeun freshwater supply and quality, fisheries, Director financial services, and human health in General Directorate of Agriculture-Extension coastal zone and Mekong Deltas. Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry • Responding to climate change is an and Fisheries, Cambodia imperative for Cambodia and cannot be separated from the country’s economic • There are four Cambodian provinces in the development and poverty alleviation goals. Mekong Delta area, such as Takeo, Kandal, The country aims of achieving upper-middle Prey Veng, and Svay Rieng provinces. income status by 2030, as enshrined in the • The government of Cambodia works to National Strategy Development Plan (NSDP). address risk and build resilience to climate • Cambodia has made significant progress in change, build infrastructure, and put early climate change strategies and policies and is warning system to protect the community rolling out its climate change response - in and ecosystem. particular, explicit efforts have been made in • Cambodia has partnership with One CGIAR mainstreaming climate change into national and its centers, such as IRRI, WorldFish, and sub-national planning and budgeting. IWMI, and CIAT to work on maximizing • Key achievements and priorities include: research impact in the agriculture sector. negotiations UNFCCC report, adaptation, Current initiatives include: AMD, Resilient mitigation, climate finance, M&E, and Aquatic Food Systems for Healthy People capacity building. and Planet, Excellence in Agronomy for 13 Sustainable Intensification and Climate Dr. Borarin Buntong Change Adaptation; and Plant Health and Director, Division of Research and Extension Rapid Response to Protect Food Security Royal University of Agriculture, Cambodia and Livelihoods. • Cambodia is adapting the ASEAN Guidelines • The main goal of the Royal University of for Promoting Climate-Smart Agriculture. Agriculture (RUA) is to produce high quality Cambodia also plans to develop and and qualified graduates, professional implement water security improvement researchers, and create products for policy project, climate-friendly and climate-smart decisions and industry in the whole chain of agriculture is included in this project. agriculture. RUA has 10 programs related to • Cambodia will continue to develop stress- agriculture and climate change and other tolerant varieties of rice, high yielding and relevant crosscutting issues. short duration, less methane intensive rice • RUA aims to increase agricultural productivity, cultivar practices - DDSR, integrated crop diversification and industrialization, such management (integrated nutrient crop as in crop, rubber, and other crops, animal management, integrated pest management) production and health, fisheries, food sector as well as good agriculture practices, organic and agro-industry including food safety agriculture, mechanization, low methane and nutrition, agricultural engineering and aquaculture, protection and restoration mechanization, agribusiness and agriculture of soil and agro system, and conservation economics and forestry agriculture. • RUA also aims to contribute in creating • Cambodia aims to promote climate- a sustainable environment and natural smart agribusiness by empowering and resources management and climate development agri-cooperative, business resilience through its natural management cluster to support trade facilitation, and and forestry programs agriculture products. The government seeks • Also, to improve and institutional and human the support from One CGIAR on these topics. resource capacity, efficiency, and inclusion. • Cambodia has created the enabling • RUA targets to promote innovative and environment – strategies, policies, and resilient market and industry development laws. MAFF also works on mainstreaming that is environment-friendly through and integration the climate change in research, extension and technology agriculture development policy and in transfer; and to provide a platform for the setting up mechanisms. Cambodia aims for young generation to conduct business and more cooperation with One CGIAR on these continue career in research and provide concerns. them with entrepreneurship skills • RUA is proud of its Center of Excellence in Agricultural Intensification and Nutrition, which focuses on conservation agriculture; and also of its Center for Biogas. 14 Breakout Session 1 to help farmers in building that investment Challenges, Gaps, and Opportunities capabilities Opportunities For the first breakout session, the focus area • “We are in this project”, being together in groups tackled the challenges, gaps, and AMD opportunities in the implementation and scaling • Rise of public-private partnerships, matching of the AMD initiative. market and producers, which goes towards network-building and creating those Specific questions linkages • Building on existing groups of cooperatives 1. What are the challenges in achieving the • Existing policies that are supportive objectives of the focus area? The facilitator • Existing strands in services (i.e., can expound on topics that are relevant to mechanization, logistics) the group (e.g., environmental challenges, Gaps social, institutional, etc.) (External) • Research gaps on what the farmers’ really 2. What are the opportunities in achieving need; disconnect between the researchers the objectives of the focus area? and farmers’ needs 3. What are the gaps relevant to the focus • Market needs assessment area? (Internal) • Low cost technology for the supply chains • Research • Expertise gap on good research practices • Resources for laboratories and protocols, reaching • Expertise towards policies • Technology • Technological gaps like advanced • Others technology (i.e., good machines that are scale appropriate) In the plenary presentations, the five breakout groups presented the highlights of the Focus Area 2 discussions: Challenges • To come up with a common understanding Focus Area 1 of what nutrition security means among Challenges: stakeholders • Common strands for both Cambodia • Misalignment on existing data sets and Vietnam: technology suitability Opportunities and packaging, finding location specific • Moving the discourse from food security to information nutrition security • Investment capacities and capabilities, • Tapping into existing policy and networks of finding incentives from other stakeholders institution, for diffusion of information from national to local levels 15 • Aligning with consumer and policy interest needs to be apply at the local level) on food safety certification • Supra–ministerial steering committee to • Tapping on existing top level policy coordinate existing efforts commitments (i.e., COP and UNFSS) Gaps Gaps • Lack of information for policymakers (e.g., • Limited partnerships (especially in data economic valuation, circular economy) collection) • Lack of support to young and women scientists Focus Area 3 Challenges Focus Area 5 • The overall context is a crowded space; Challenges lot of tools, platforms and services and • Coordination and communication disagreement of sectors challenges, such as: top-down and bottom • Fragmented value chains up not harmonized; micro context vs macro • Fast changes in the deltas; how to keep up policies in terms of our interventions - Coordination between different partners/ • Technical challenges (e.g., availability of crop agencies varieties) - Involving private partners • Accessibility to the services; coming up with Opportunities an effective business model • Various governments and organizations Opportunities commit and support CC adaptation and • “We do not start from scratch”; available mitigation information on and platforms of climate - CGIAR development partners’ support information services - Available policies that are responsive to • Improved technologies; access of farmers to climate change these technologies • Providing science-based evidence • Collaboration with the private sectors - research organizations support • Higher interest on climate information quantification of tradeoffs and provide services work unbiased sources of information for • Policy support around cooperatives and different policy options farmers organizations - availability of data (i.e., big data, satellite • CGIAR to play the coordinating role data) for policy making and planning Gaps Focus Area 4 • Many plans but lack of effective Challenges implementation at the local levels • Mindset being rice is the most important • Lack of scientific evidence for policy • Policies and strategies often work well on making (i.e., tradeoffs at large scale, scaling, large scale but not on small scale farming knowledge products for extension) Opportunities • Need to update data for planning • Incentives for nature-based solutions (but 16 Challenges and opportunities of scaling natural resources and agriculture initiatives in Asia Mr. Abul Basher lack of awareness about the climate-smart Senior Natural Resource and Agriculture agriculture; and missing customized and Specialist, Asian Development Bank context specific digital technologies and functional literacy, etc. • FAO Food Price index (FFPI) retreated • Production cycles creates uncertainties slightly in April 2022 from the all-time high discouraging private investment in in March 2022. Previously, FFPI had reached agriculture. new record high month-on-month, at • Opportunities for CGIAR (IRRI, for example) 159.3 points in March 2022, up 12.6% over and ADB to work together through: previous record high in February. The high continuous development and enhancement food inflation since the start of 2022, reflects of varietal adaptation to direct seeded new all-time record highs for oils, cereals, conditions to enhance climate resilience; and meat along with sharp increases in enhancement of climate resilience and sugar and dairy products profitability of rice through disruptive • An increase of annual investment in by technologies; developing clear target market USD 36.9 billion in agricultural research and segments for precise targeting of IRRI’s development (USD 1.3B), water management breeding programs connecting points with (USD 20B) and rural infrastructure (USD15.8B) national systems; developing well-aligned will reduce the food insecure people to 4.2% technologies suitable for future rice based of the projected population. systems by aligning genetics, breeding, • Issues and challenges: diminishing interest and crop management approaches; and by youth in farming; high post-harvest developing better understanding and losses due to disintegrated supply chains: provide support for policy discussion inadequate infrastructure and inefficient leading to enhancement of rice value chains market access which pose risks to food and related enterprises. safety; continuing competition for land • Promote integrated solutions for long- and water resources by other sectors— term resilience. The key approaches prime agricultural lands are being used include: climate-smart agriculture, digital for urbanization, industrialization, and technologies in agriculture, nature-based infrastructure; and climate change and solutions, and cross-sectoral/thematic extreme weather events. design of ANR projects. • Missing institutional settings/support: water • Support smallholder agriculture production markets with flat rates for water use need by: direct agribusiness lending, lending to be reviewed—“more water more charge, support to financial institutions, and less water less charge”; a knowledge-sharing microfinance program. platform or a “community of practice”; 17 Plenary Session with International Organizations on the implementation of the AMD Initiative Five panelists from the international organizations river erosion interventions that strengthen working in the Mekong Delta were given five the resilience of rural infrastructure and minutes each to discuss the following guide ecosystems; and climate-resilient and questions: water-sensitive urban infrastructure - implementation of climate-resilient and • What are the priority areas (short-term, water-sensitive urban infrastructure. medium-term, and/or long-term) of your • Another GIZ project in the delta is the Green organization related to the Mekong Delta? Innovation Centre (GIC) Vietnam, which • What are your organization’s existing focuses mainly on rice and mango value programs and activities to address food chains. security and climate and livelihood resilience in the Mekong Delta? Mr. Laurent Umans First Secretary Water and Climate Change Mr. Nguyen Khiem Embassy of the Netherlands Programme Officer, GIZ Vietnam • Some of the dynamic challenges and issues • GIZ portfolio in the Mekong Delta includes a in the Mekong Delta: flood and drought, total of 14 projects, four (4) are completed, poverty and pollution, climate change and nine (9) ongoing and one (1) on the pipeline. subsidence and salinity, rice and aquaculture, • The Mekong Delta Climate Resilience and technical and governance and political Programme (MCRP) of GIZ is being economy and ecology. implemented from 2019 to 2025. The • Solutions and programs: water retention climate-resilient management of natural and (aquifer) storage, water treatment, resources in coastal areas of the Mekong agricultural transformation, reduce Delta is aimed to improve for ensuring groundwater and sand extraction, sustainable development in the region. spatial integrated planning, coordinated • This can be achieved by: institutional implementation and sufficient budget, strengthening - establish an institutional green economic development pathway framework to facilitate regional coordination and (climate) finance, and deep societal of climate-resilient development in the transformation to ‘live with nature’ and care Mekong Delta; climate-resilient investment for it. planning - improving investment planning • Key messages: the Mekong Delta should at regional level for climate-resilient and be seen, governed and treated as a whole; gender-sensitive management of water actively living with nature is guiding resources in urban and rural areas; innovative the implementation; shift from a linear technologies, coastal and river erosion exploitation practices to a circular sustainable interventions - implementing the application management practices; enable risk of innovative technologies and coastal and 18 reduction; invest not only in infrastructure; community infrastructure; and direct and design inclusive processes. engagement in village- and commune-level planning. Dr. Nguyen Ngoc Quang Senior Consultant Dr. Chau Minh Khoi International Fund for Agricultural Development Vice Dean, College of Agriculture, Can Tho University and Country Lead, FOCUS project • The IFAD Country Strategies in Vietnam include: building pro-poor and stable value • Farmer Options for Crops Under Saline chains leveraging significant investments conditions (FOCUS) in the Mekong River from the private sector; enhancing and Delta, Vietnam is a project that aims to expanding financial inclusion for climate- increase production and profitability of resilient rural livelihoods; and fostering the saline affected crop production systems and environmental sustainability and climate to create a capacity legacy to enable these resilience of ethnic minorities’ smallholder systems to adapt to ongoing climate change economic activities. in the Mekong Delta. • IFAD has long term commitment investing • FOCUS was implemented in Soc Trang, Hau in adaptation/resilience. These projects are: Giang, Can Tho, and An Giang. Improving Market Participation of the Poor • FOCUS research activities include: in Tra Vinh (IMPP) from 2006 to 2012 worth characterization of the impact of saline USD 37.3M; Developing Business with the water intrusion on crop-based farming Rural Poor in Ben Tre (DBRP) from 2007 to systems (water, soil, crops, people, markets); 2014 worth USD 50.5M; Adaption to Climate development and evaluation of crop Change in the Mekong Delta in Ben Tre and diversification and soil management options Tra Vinh (AMD) from 2013 to 2020 worth for saline affected-areas; analysis market USD 49.34M; and Climate Smart Agriculture opportunities and policies for adaptive Transformation Project (CSAT) from 2022 to transformation of cropping systems in the 2027 worth USD 136.4M. MRD; and development and promotion of • These IFAD Investments in Mekong Delta spatially targeted management practices aim to achieve: diversified livelihood and which build adaptive capacity and optimize income streams; better access to knowledge farm livelihoods in a changing environment. and adoption of CCA practices; membership • FOCUS project was structure with objectives of social networks such as CIGs and SCGs; and research components to deliver adaptive ability to access credit; protection from transformation of cropping systems in MRD. climatic hazards as result of small-scale 19 Dr. Dang Kieu Nhan and productivity, and also circularity level Director at the farm and farming community to Mekong Delta Development Research Institute consider water and landscapes. Also, on the Can Tho University community level, on adapting to stresses like salinity intrusion. • Mekong Delta Development Research • Alliance with other research and Institute (MDI), an interdisciplinary institute development organization is done to under Can Tho University (CTU), is working improve the capacity of farmers on farming under four main themes, such as: natural and business, especially on cooperative and resources management, food systems, also to improve agriculture value chains by rural development, and public policy and linking private sector and farmers. governance. • The five main concerns of MDI relevant to • Food security is one of the outcomes of the AMD: inter-zone coordination (i.e., conflict food systems in a broad perspective beyond in water use in the upper and lower zone the household level. of the delta), thus, information should be • Wageningen University and Research is a put in the communities at large scale (e.g., long partner of CTU in addressing challenges to address water use conflict); information in MRD, dealing with integrated farming should also be in landscape level in order systems in order to improve resource use to manage producing areas for value chain; of farming households, improve food value local government and farmers and private chains under areas-based management enterprises play around farming system based on food supermarkets, and to deal shift than agriculture system shifts (natural- with delta food system transformation induced risk to human-induced risk); and under new normal pressure particularly improve farming products for smallholders, in the MRD. CTU and WUR also focused by finding their place in the value chain (not on stresses that produce pressure, salinity only on farming activities) to increase the intrusion, and ground water depletion. income of smallholders. • The activities are placed in the broader context that is agricultural transformation as promoted by the government, labor shift, urbanization, and industrialization in the delta, in order to improve livelihood 20 Breakout Session 2 • Social learning (i.e., upgrading the farmers’ Scaling the AMD initiative organization skills on agribusiness, mechanization) The second breakout session focused on the • Restructuring the cropping system/ identifying the projects, programs, and platforms improved agronomy systems (diversification on research and/or scaling of the possible options, understanding the adoption issues, institutional partners. Based on the relevant postharvest losses, mechanization) efforts identified and also on the challenges, opportunities, and gaps (from the Breakout Focus Area 2 Session 1), the members of the breakout groups • Engage and support policy mechanism identified the priorities for the implementation related to nutrition sensitive agri-food of their respective focus areas. system • Improve interlinkage/access and sharing Specific questions information/data from different sector (pros and cons) 1. What are the existing projects/programs/ • Quantify/evaluate on linkages/models/ platforms (for networking and knowledge influence, trade off sharing) of the partners in the group that • Promote farmers to participate in seminar are relevant to the Focus Area? for nutrition 2. Are the projects/programs/platforms • Provide/research concept system focusing on research or scaling or understanding of food security/ nutrition, both? nutrition-sensitive agriculture, driver 3. What are the priorities of the Focus Areas (gender, youth), market, value chain and based on the challenges, opportunities pros and cons in production and gaps, and also, on the partners’ • Evidence on nutrient values along production existing projects/programs/ platforms? and consumption In the plenary presentations, the five breakout Focus Area 3 groups presented the list of priorities they • Overview of existing tools and platform identified in the discussions: and discuss/agree on areas for integration or improvement (key features and Focus Area 1 characteristics, business model, typology, • Characterization (i.e., cropping system diversified users) mapping, carbon trading, market trends, soil • Coordinate link among climate producer, health) translator, disseminator, and users 21 • Understand capacity needs of actors (data Focus Area 5 producers, translator, and users) and • Landscape planning capacity building to climate producer, user, • Cross-sector coordination and translator • Private engagement (value chain financing) • Explore potential collaboration/network • Climate financing building/scoping of partners for further • Mechanism and policy for area integration engagement and linking for scaling and • Data integration resource mobilization • Research: farmer response to risk, climate • change and adaptation Focus Area 4 • Positive migration impacts • Institutional and policy analysis towards • Digitalization for forecast, planning, and systems/mechanisms of governance for investment food system/environment • Climate-smart mapping • Identify ‘locations’ for governance-related • Data/knowledge sharing platform research • Incentive policies (support/finance) • Options for nature based solutions; • Nature-based solutions facilitated migrations (rural-urban) • Data/method inventory, identifying gaps • Case studies of public interest vis-a-vis. • Suitable map for mitigation options private profit seeking • Short-long term trade off • Alternatives to top-down governance: • Tools for decision-making bottom up, communal management (not • Categorizing available data to identify gaps separated between public vs. private) like • Water dialogue platform for AMD (data the successful model of Community Fish sharing between Cambodia and Vietnam) Refuge (CFR) in Cambodia • Identify key stakeholder engagement plan • Identification, assessment and suggestion to apply climate-smart technologies/practices based on local needs 22 Breakout Session 3 3.1. Assessment of commune-level production Work Planning systems and practices 3.2. Adaptive research on productivity gaps Using the information gathered from Breakout Sessions 1 and 2, the participants prepared a work plan for the focus area. Identified per specific Vietnam focus area objective, the actions were elaborated Objective 1: Land suitability assessments and in terms of deliverables, specific activities, sites, characterization for agri-production system milestones, lead CGIAR centers, and partners and diversification options their specific roles. 1.1. Agro-ecological database 1.2. High resolution suitability mapping of In the plenary presentations, the five breakout cropping systems for specific agro-ecological groups presented the highlights of their regions respective work plans: 1.3. Mapping experts, resources, and scaling partners Focus Area 1 Objective 2: Strengthen social learning and Cambodia innovation through inclusive learning alliances Objective 1: Land suitability assessments and to identify opportunities to mitigate and adapt characterization for agri-production system to climate risks diversification options Focus on learning alliance for sustainable rice 1.1. Mapping straw management 2.1. Develop business model Objective 2: Strengthen social learning and 2.2. Capacity development and knowledge innovation through inclusive learning alliances exchange on mechanization services and (LA) to identify opportunities to mitigate and machinery operations adapt to climate risks 2.3. Technology transfer and field demonstration 2.1. SWOT analysis of agri-ccop on mechanized rice straw composting 2.2. LA Toolkit (in English) 2.4. Cross-country LAs 2.3. Cross-country learning Objective 3: Develop improved agronomy Objective 3: Develop improved agronomy packages for diversified delta production packages for diversified delta production systems, tailored to local contexts for increased systems, tailored to local contexts for increased climate resilience climate resilience 23 Focus on mechanization and precision farming 3.1. Literature review (policy, food law, etc.) supporting 1M5R and Sustainable Rice Platform 3.2. Consultation workshop with relevant 3.1. Verification/adaptive research/field trials stakeholders in large scale 3.2. Capacity building: demonstrations and Focus Area 3 trainings Objective 1: Identify inclusive intervention 3.3. Farmers’ school strategies and options for digital tools, platforms 3.4. Business model and services with public and private sector 1.1. Scoping of prioritized production systems/ Focus Area 2 value chain (review value chains, value chain Objective 1: Assess changes in deltaic food risks and vulnerability assessment, and impacts consumption patterns in relation to demand side of risks) drivers of change, to reveal socially differentiated 1.2. Overview of existing tools and platforms nutrition outcomes and discuss/agree on the potential areas for 1.1. Literature review integration 1.2. List existing data description 1.3. Scoping of partners for further 1.3. Data collection: nutrition KAP, diets (eat at engagement and linking and explore potential home or out-home) collaboration/network building 1.4. Explore on consumption need demand 1.4. Users’ need assessment and agroecosystem 1.5. Identify early intervention options 1.5. Consultation workshop with relevant stakeholders Objective 2: Assessment and co-development of inclusive digital products and services Objective 2: Evaluate how deltaic agroecosystem 2.1. Design human-centered products/services and food production practices are transforming 2.2. Agree on partnership arrangement in response to multiple drivers, to reveal socially- 2.3. Hackathons collective approach to identify differentiated nutrition outcomes solution 2.1. Farm survey: production, labor, technology, 2.4 Develop inclusive business model with change, land, climate gender and social inclusion 2.2. Analyse data collected and identify what has been changed Objective 3. Sustainable financing models and partnerships to support scaling of inclusive Objective 3: Identify and quantify the benefits of DCAS+ nutrition sensitive policies and interventions to 3.1. Assess existing models and finance support equitable and sustainable consumption institution and production of nutritious foods in deltas in 3.2. Develop convincing financial model the face of rapid change 3.4. Build partnership 24 Focus Area 4 Master plan Objective 1: Facilitate policy makers to identify 1.5. Agri-land use mapping integrated food systems strategies (provincial to national/cross-border) Objective 2: Climate action plans 1.1. Evidence of lack of science-based decision Vietnam making; rhetoric of policies 2.1. Explore demand for low carbon products 1.2. In-depth analysis of key policies - one 2.2. Highlight SDG’s quality of rice carbon province for demonstration? credits that also have adaptation benefit 1.3. Examples of nature-based solutions that 2.3. Explore e-traceability are working (in Cambodia: CFR, which is 2.4. Identify existing sources of financing and working very well) gaps 1.4. Top-down policy interventions 2.5 Framework for diverse investment (Green 1.5. Cambodia: Decentralization. Strengthen bonds, NH carbon trade, PPP) legislation, because policies are there but poor 2.6. Review NAPs to identify specific activities implementation is the problem. then add value to existing initiatives 1.6. Regulation of deforestation, forest floods Cambodia 2.7. Identify climate information and risk Objective 2: Build capacity of sub-national and assessment for adaptive planning and local institutions to implement strategies investment 2.1. Capacity building of local authorities, 2.8. Review policy and partnership initiative to communities attract donors government investment 2.2. Cambodia: Technical capacity of fishers - small/medium enterprises, women, food Objective 3: Inclusive climate-responsive delta processing, and value chains development pathways 2.3. Series of workshops (policy makers and other stakeholders) Objective 4: Knowledge Integration Network Vietnam Objective 3: Build capacity of grassroots actors/ 4.1. Engage in multiple stakeholder dialogue networks. 4.2. Linking with PSAV 3.1. Citizen science programs (evidence, info 4.3. Pre-COP 26: Technical advisory group for sharing, and networking) MARD 4.4. VN-SIPA: Support for implementation of Focus Area 5 Paris Agreement Objective 1: Projected climate risks and 4.5. Sustainable Transformation Mekong Delta vulnerability risks to inform planning Network (PMU) 1.1. Detail planning for the Mekong Regional 4.6. Management office of agriculture activities Master plan in MRD 1.2. Update CS-MAP for short-term forecasting Cambodia changing cropping calendar 4.7. Regular Food Security and Nutrition Forum 1.3. Ex-ante assessment of the Mekong organized by CARDI Regional Masterplan 4.8. National innovative platform for agriculture 1.4. Detailed planning for the Mekong Regional food systems 25 Conclusions and Next Steps Strong partnership building with other organizations and projects/programs. More than 80 participants attended the event The diversity of participants from Cambodia representing the government agencies of and Vietnam, representing the different Vietnam and Cambodia, CGIAR and its centers delta stakeholders, gave AMD and its FAs an working for AMD, international organizations, opportunity to explore possible partnerships in academic institutions, private sector, and other the implementation of AMD, including discussions relevant stakeholders groups. The inception on contract arrangements. Integration with other workshop provided a venue for: open discussion One CGIAR Initiatives and other national and between the research team and stakeholders international programs, both at the country and on the initiative’s plans and programs; co- regional levels, was also tackled and a collective designing specific work plans for Cambodia and interest among all the participants. Vietnam for each of the FAs; and building crucial partnerships for research activities and scaling, Inclusive co-development of work plans for both with national agencies and international Cambodia and Vietnam. The work planning organizations. session provided the participants, particularly the national and local partners, the venue to Through the event, the AMD Initiative was able articulate their voices in the identification of to achieve several workshop outcomes: specific activities to be implemented under each FA. The priority-identification session guided Building connection among FAs and mutual the work planning in designing activities that understanding of AMD’s scope and focus. respond more to partners’ priorities. The inception workshop became the platform for AMD to give a more detailed introduction Identification of scaling opportunities. of the initiative to the key stakeholders. In the Through the breakout sessions, each of the FA plenary and breakout sessions, the teams were team was able to identify the existing projects, able to explain more on the scope of their FA and programs, and platforms on research and/or also to discuss some questions and clarifications scaling of the possible institutional partners. related to AMD. The interactive approaches used Several scaling platforms were identified at shed more light on what is AMD and its intended the local, national, and regional levels, which interventions. will also facilitate cross-FA and cross-Initiative integrations. 26 The event also served as the official launch of the AMD initiative, which was reported by several local and national media. Next steps identified by the AMD team together with the participating stakeholders are: • Working on formal partners engagement (i.e., contract arrangements) • Formation of a steering committee • Revising the results framework • Development of an impact assessment plan • Planning the AMD Initiative launch in Ganges Delta 27 List of Participants Name of participant Designation Organization Focus Area 1 (Agronomy) FA1 Lead/Research Leader - Soil, Water and Environment Unit, Sustainable Impact Sudhir Yadav through Rice-based Systems AMD/International Rice Research Institute Nguyen Van Hung Scientist, Mechanization and Postharvest International Rice Research Institute Rica Flor (also FA5) Scientist, Innovation System International Rice Research Institute Akhara Ouk Assistant Scientist- Agri Production System International Rice Research Institute Nguyen Van Hieu IRRI’s consultant - rice straw management Tien Giang University IRRI’s consultant - mechanization and Nguyen Thanh Nghi postharvest Nong Lam University Tran Thi Cam Nhung Assistant Scientist- Agri Production System International Rice Research Institute Sao Sok Senior Technical Specialist WorldFish Tran Ngoc Thach Director CLRRI Nguyen Hong Son President Vietnam Academy for Agricultural Sciences Le Thanh Tung Deputy Director for South Department of Crop Production Ho Thanh Binh Vice Rector An Giang University Chu Viet Ha Director Bayer Vietnam Borarin Buntong Director, Division of Research and Extension Royal University of Agriculture Nguyen Khiem Project Officer GIZ/MCRP Nguyen Ngoc Son Project Officer GIZ Pham Thi Minh Hieu Head Sub-Division of Crop Production, DARD-Can Tho Focus Area 2 (Nutrition) Ben Belton AMD FA2 leader WorldFish Huynh Thi Thanh Tuyen AMD FA2 member, SHiFT coordinator Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Deborah Nabuuma (online) Nutrition Scientist Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Hoang The Ky Reasearch Consultant Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Cao Le Quyen Vice Director Vietnam Institute of Fisheries Economics and Planning Truong Tuyet Mai Deputy Director National Institute of Nutrition Sim Sokcheng Trainer, Independent Researcher Cambodia Development Resource Institute Chou Phanith Lecturer and researcher Royal University Phnom Penh Kim Savoeun General Deputy Director Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries Hsu Mon Aung Researcher WorldFish - Myanmar Ho Thanh Binh Vice Dean of An Giang University An Giang University Nguyen Thi Hien Lecturer and researcher, Department of Nu-trition and Food Safety Can Tho University of Medicine and Phamarcy Nguyen Le Ngoc Giau Lecturer, Department Environmental Health Can Tho University of Medicine and Phamarcy Focus Area 3 (Climate services) Cornelis Swaans AMD FA3 Lead Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Angelica Barlis Senior Coordinator/Project Manager, AMD and DeRISK Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Le Thi Tam Vietnam Country Coordinator, AMD and DeRISK Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Nguyen Mai Huong Research Associate, AMD and DeRISK Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Yim Soksophors Cambodia coordinator, AMD and DeRISK International Institute of Rural Reconstruction Wilson John Barbon Country Director - Myanmar International Institute of Rural Reconstruction Jorgen Jensen Interim Lead for Cambodia WorldFish Tran Thị My Hạnh Technical staff Department of Crop Production (in the South) 28 Nguyen Viet Khoa Head of Training Department National Agriculture Extension Center Le Dinh Quyet Deputy Head Forecasting Department of Southern Region Hydro-Meteorological Center Am Phirum Deputy Director Agricultural Land Resources Management James Gilles (online) Specialist (Climate Strategy) Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Chou Panith Researcher Phnom Penh/Royal University Focus Area 4 (Institutions and gender) Deepa Joshi Senior Scientist/FA4 Lead AMD/International Water Management Institute Bui Trang Assistant CIP Nozomi Kawarazuka Social Scientist CIP Michael Akester Regional Director SEA WorldFish Sao Sok Research Fellow WorldFish Lan Nguyen Senior Trade & Policy Advisor Dutch Embassy Chan Phalouen Undersecretary of State Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries Deputy Director, Department of Climate Khlok Vichetratha Change Ministry of Environment Chau Minh Khoi Researcher / Lecturer Can Tho University First Secretary, Water Management and Laurent Umans Climate Change Dutch Embassy Nguyen Minh Quang Lecturer / Forum Managing Director Can Tho University/Mekong Environmental Forum Focus Area 5 (Planning) Katherine Nelson FA5 Lead/Scientist AMD/International Rice Research Institute Leo Palao (online) Climate risk and adaptive capacity specialist Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Alice Laborte (also FA1) GIS/remote sensing scientist International Rice Research Institute Le Phuong Dung Researcher Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT Ong Quoc Cuong Economist International Rice Research Institute Keo Sokheng Specialist-Water Management IRRI-Cambodia Bui Tan Yen Senior Scientist International Rice Research Institute Mai Van Trinh Director Institute of Agricultural Environment Dang Kieu Nhan Director, Mekong Delta Development Research Institute (MDI) Can Tho University Mak Soeun Director General Directorate of Agriculture- Extension Department Vu Thanh Ha Officer-in-Charge to CGIAR International Cooperation Department Nguyen Ngoc Quang Senior Consultant IFAD Jennifer Barnard Scientist International Rice Research Institute Tran Dai Nghia Institute for Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Director Development Le Nhut Tao Sub-DCP Can Tho First Secretary, Water Management and Laurent Umans Climate Change Dutch Embassy Duong Hong Diep Project staff IFAD Inception Workshop Organizing Team AMD Lead/Country Representative to Bjoern Ole Sander Vietnam International Rice Research Institute Pham Tho Workshop facilitator Dinh Kim Dung Office Manager International Rice Research Institute Associate Scientist, Data Management and Vu Hong Trang MEL International Rice Research Institute Eisen Bernardo Communication Consultant International Rice Research Institute 29 Workshop Agenda Day 1: 28 June 2022 (Tuesday) Time Activity In-Charge 08:00–08:30 Registration Secretariat Opening program Mr. Le Thanh Tung • Opening remarks Deputy Director for South DCP-MARD, Vietnam Dr. Stephan Weise 08:30–09:00 Managing Director, CIAT Asia Dr. Martin Kropff • Welcome messages Global DirectorResilient Agrifood Systems, CGIAR Mr. Tran Thai Nghiem Deputy Director General, DARD Can Tho 09:00–09:15 Introduction of Participants 09:15–09:25 Group photo All participants Plenary Session 1: Introduction of the AMD Initiative Country priorities Dr. Nguyen Hong Son 09:25–09:45 and statement of support and expectations President, VAAS, Vietnam from the partner countries Dr. Chan Phaloeun Undersecretary of State, MAFF, Cambodia Overview of CGIAR Initiative Dr. Björn Ole Sander 09:45–10:00 on Securing the Food Systems Senior Climate Change Expert of Asian Mega-Deltas for Climate Country Representative to Vietnam, and Livelihood Resilience IRRIInitiative Leader, AMD FOCUS AREA LEADERS Dr. Sudhir Yadav, IRRI 10:00–10:15 Brief Introduction of the Dr. Benjamin Belton, WorldFishfive AMD Focus Areas Dr. Cornelis Swaans, ABC Dr. Deepa Joshi, IWMI Dr. Katherine Nelson, IRRI Coffee/tea break 10:15–10:30 Viewing of AMD posters 10:30–11:30 Workshop activity- Expectations on the Initiative All participants 11:30–11:50 Open forum Facilitator 11:50–12:00 Synthesis Facilitator 12:00-13:30 Lunch Break 30 Breakout Sessions: AMD Focus Areas (Opportunities, Challenges and Gaps) 13:30-13:45 Icebreaker Facilitator Session with national agencies on the implementation of the AMD Initiative 13:45-14:25 Introduction to the national agencies’ works/ Dr. Mai Van Trinh, IAE priorities Dr. Nguyen Viet Khoa, NAEC Representative, DCRD Ms. Khlok Vichetratha, DCC-MoE Dr. Mak Soeun, GDA-MAFF Dr. Borarin Buntong, RUA 14:25-14:40 Open forum 14:40-14:50 Guidelines for the breakout groups Introduction of the group facilitators and rapporteurs 14:50-15:05 Coffee/tea break Viewing of AMD posters 15:05-15:10 Video clip of a successful initiative in the Delta 15:10-16:10 1st Breakout sessions Research teams and participants on the AMD Focus Areas Focus Area leaders as facilitators  Focus Area 1: Adapting Deltaic Production Systems  Focus Area 2: Nutrition-Sensitive Deltaic Agrifood Systems  Focus Area 3: De-risking Delta-oriented Value Chains  Focus Area 4: Joined-up, Gender-equitable, Socially-inclusive Deltaic Natural Resource-Food Systems Governance  Focus Area 5: Evidence-based Delta Development Planning 16:10-16:25 Wrap up of the breakout sessions Preparation of the plenary presentation 16:25-16:50 Plenary presentations per Focus Area Feedback Session 16:50-17:00 Synthesis Facilitator 18:00- Cocktails 19:00– Dinner/Socials Day 2: 29 June 2022 (Wednesday) Plenary Session 2: Scaling the AMD initiative 08:00–08:15 Registration Secretariat 08:15–08:20 Recap of Day 1 08:20–08:30 Icebreaker 08:30–08:45 Challenges and opportunities of scaling natural Mr. Abul Basher resources and agriculture initiatives Senior Natural Resource and in Asia Agriculture Specialist, Asian Development Bank 08:45–09:00 Q and A with the plenary speaker 31 Session with international organizations on the implementation and scaling of the AMD Initiative 09:00–09:20 Introduction to the international organizations’ Mr. Nguyen Khiem, GIZ Vietnam works/priorities Mr. Laurent Umans, Dutch Embassy Dr. Nguyen Ngoc Quang, IFAD Dr. Chau Minh Khoi, FOCUS Dr. Dang Kieu Nhan, MDI-CTU/WUR 09:20–09:35 Open forum 09:35–09:40 Guidelines for the 2nd breakout session 09:40–09:55 Coffee/tea break Viewing of AMD posters 09:55–11:05 2nd breakout sessions on the AMD Focus Areas Research teams and participantsFocus Area leaders as facilitators 11:05–11:20 Wrap up of the breakout sessions Preparation of the plenary presentation 11:20–11:45 Plenary presentations per Focus Area Appointed presenters Feedback Session Participants 11:45–12:00 Synthesis Facilitator Guidelines for the 3rd breakout session 12:00–13:30 Lunch Breakout Sessions: AMD Focus Areas Work Plan Development 13:30-13:45 Icebreaker 13:45-15:00 3rd Breakout sessions on the AMD Focus Areas Research teams and participants 15:00-15:15 Working coffee/tea break 15:15-15:45 Continuation of the 3rd Breakout sessions Group facilitators Wrap up of the breakout sessions Preparation of the plenary presentation 15:45-16:10 Plenary presentations per Focus Area Appointed presenters Feedback Session Participants 16:10-16:50 Open discussion on the proposed work plans 16:50-17:00 Synthesis Facilitator 17:00-17:25 Formation of the steering committee 17:25-17:30 Closing remarks Dr. Björn Ole Sander Initiative Leader, AMD 19:00- Dinner 32 Media Releases 1. Vietnamplus: Initiative to protect food systems in Asian mega delta launched in Can Tho 2. Nong Nghiep: Khởi động Sáng kiến AMD về bảo vệ hệ thống lương thực Châu Á; CGIAR’s Initiative for securing Asia mega-deltas’s food system launched 3. Can Tho TV: Khởi động sáng kiến CGIAR về bảo vệ hệ thống lương thực; YouTube 4. Bao Quoc Te: Initiative to protect food systems in Asian Mega Deltas (AMD) launched in Can Tho 5. SGGP Online: Mega-deltas creating food baskets severely impacted by climate change; Các đồng bằng tạo ra “giỏ thực phẩm” đang chịu tác động nghiêm trọng do biến đổi khí hậu 6. Nông thôn Việt: Các đồng bằng tạo ra “giỏ thực phẩm” đang chịu tác động nghiêm trọng do biến đổi khí hậu 7. NhanDan: Initiative to protect food systems in Asian mega delta launched in Can Tho 33