Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

Language

en

Review Status

Peer Review

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Usage Rights

CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0

Share

Citation

Sulaiman, Munshi. 2018. Livelihood, cash transfer, and graduation approaches: How do they compare in terms of cost, impact, and targeting? In Boosting growth to end hunger by 2025: The role of social protection, eds. Fleur Stephanie Wouterse and Alemayehu Seyoum Taffesse. Chapter 8, Pp. 102-120. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). https://hdl.handle.net/10568/147363

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

Abstract/Description

Chapter 8 provides a comparative analysis of 48 graduation, livelihood, and cash transfer programs. Using income and consumption as the primary metrics of impact and focusing on long-term outcomes, the author assesses the sustainability of impact of these programs and compares both costs and impacts across the three types of approaches.