The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method

cg.contributor.affiliationCenter for International Forestry Researchen
cg.coverage.countryZambia
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2ZM
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-023-01806-zen
cg.isijournalISI Journalen
cg.issn0364-152Xen
cg.issue1en
cg.journalEnvironmental Managementen
cg.reviewStatusPeer Reviewen
cg.volume74en
dc.contributor.authorSiangulube, F.S.en
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T08:21:03Zen
dc.date.available2023-07-12T08:21:03Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/131119
dc.titleThe Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Methoden
dcterms.abstractMultistakeholder platforms (MSPs) are increasingly applied in environmental governance as institutions to collectively negotiate challenges, opportunities, and policy options in contested landscapes. However, their contributions and effectiveness depend on how stakeholders perceive and frame the role of MSPs in addressing social and environmental challenges. Despite this dependence, stakeholder perceptions of MSPs are currently under-researched. Hence this empirical study carried out in Zambia’s Kalomo District asks: how do stakeholder groups perceive the role of MSPs in addressing landscape challenges, given the context of the dual land tenure system, and what does this imply for the implementation of integrated landscape approaches? This study uses Q-methodology to analyze the perceptions of purposefully selected stakeholders from state institutions, civil society organizations, land users, and others familiar with existing MSPs at the district and village levels. The findings reveal three narratives. The first one presents MSPs as institutions that foster dialogue. The second narrative foregrounds the role of the government and private sector, despite acknowledging the diversity of stakeholders in MSPs. In this narrative, MSPs should focus on supporting market-driven solutions to resolve landscape challenges. The third narrative recognizes power imbalances and considers MSPs as institutions to identify policy gaps and needs. The first two narratives are positioned in Dryzek’s discourse classification as environmental problem-solving, while the third inclines toward green radicalism. Despite this divergence, there was consensus that MSPs have the potential to harmonize policies in a dual governance system and encourage dialogue between stakeholders to reconcile landscape challenges.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.available2023-03-20
dcterms.bibliographicCitationSiangulube, F. (2023). The Role of Multistakeholder Platforms in Environmental Governance: Analyzing Stakeholder Perceptions in Kalomo District, Zambia, Using Q-Method. Environmental Management. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01806-zen
dcterms.extentpp. 13-30en
dcterms.issued2023-03-20
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherSpringeren
dcterms.subjectgovernanceen
dcterms.subjectstakeholdersen
dcterms.subjectlandscape conservationen
dcterms.subjectpollutionen
dcterms.subjectecologyen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: