Data sharing and ontology use among agricultural genetics, genomics, and breeding databases and resources of the Agbiodata Consortium
Citation
Clarke, J.L.; Cooper, L.D.; Poelchau, M.F.; Berardini, T.Z.; Elser, J.; Farmer, A.D.; Ficklin, S.; Kumari, S.; Laporte, M-A.; Nelson, R.T.; Sadohara, R.; Selby, P.; Thessen, A.E.; Whitehead, B.; Sen, T.Z. (2023) Data sharing and ontology use among agricultural genetics, genomics, and breeding databases and resources of the Agbiodata Consortium. Database 2023: baad076. ISSN: 1758-0463
Abstract/Description
Over the last couple of decades, there has been a rapid growth in the number and scope of agricultural genetics, genomics and breeding databases and resources. The AgBioData Consortium (https://www.agbiodata.org/) currently represents 44 databases and resources (https://www.agbiodata.org/databases) covering model or crop plant and animal GGB data, ontologies, pathways, genetic variation and breeding platforms (referred to as 'databases' throughout). One of the goals of the Consortium is to facilitate FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) data management and the integration of datasets which requires data sharing, along with structured vocabularies and/or ontologies. Two AgBioData working groups, focused on Data Sharing and Ontologies, respectively, conducted a Consortium-wide survey to assess the current status and future needs of the members in those areas. A total of 33 researchers responded to the survey, representing 37 databases. Results suggest that data-sharing practices by AgBioData databases are in a fairly healthy state, but it is not clear whether this is true for all metadata and data types across all databases; and that, ontology use has not substantially changed since a similar survey was conducted in 2017. Based on our evaluation of the survey results, we recommend (i) providing training for database personnel in a specific data-sharing techniques, as well as in ontology use; (ii) further study on what metadata is shared, and how well it is shared among databases; (iii) promoting an understanding of data sharing and ontologies in the stakeholder community; (iv) improving data sharing and ontologies for specific phenotypic data types and formats; and (v) lowering specific barriers to data sharing and ontology use, by identifying sustainability solutions, and the identification, promotion, or development of data standards. Combined, these improvements are likely to help AgBioData databases increase development efforts towards improved ontology use, and data sharing via programmatic means. Database URL https://www.agbiodata.org/databases.
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
Author ORCID identifiers
Laurel Cooper https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6379-8932
Monica Poelchau https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4584-6056
Tanya Berardini https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-8864
Marie-Angélique Laporte https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8461-9745
Justin Elser https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0921-1982
Andrew Farmer https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4224-2433
Stephen P. Ficklin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-6292
Sunita Kumari https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9166-1450
Rie Sadohara https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2861-5288
Peter Selby https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7151-4445
Anne Thessen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2908-3327
Brandon Whitehead https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0337-8610
Taner Sen https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5553-6190
