The EU is critical of the Harbinson text
| cg.contributor.affiliation | Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation | |
| cg.coverage.region | ACP | |
| cg.coverage.region | Africa | |
| cg.coverage.region | Caribbean | |
| cg.coverage.region | Oceania | |
| cg.howPublished | Formally Published | |
| cg.identifier.url | http://agritrade.cta.int/Back-issues/Agriculture-monthly-news-update/2003/April-2003 | |
| cg.journal | Agritrade | |
| cg.number | April 2003 | |
| cg.place | Wageningen, The Netherlands | |
| cg.subject.cta | MARKETING | |
| cg.subject.cta | TRADE | |
| dc.contributor.author | Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-01-09T14:08:21Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2015-01-09T14:08:21Z | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/52844 | |
| dc.title | The EU is critical of the Harbinson text | en |
| dcterms.abstract | EU criticisms of the revised Harbinson text focussed on: a failure... | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | CTA. 2003. The EU is critical of the Harbinson text. Agritrade, April 2003. CTA, Wageningen, The Netherlands. | en |
| dcterms.description | EU criticisms of the revised Harbinson text focussed on: a failure to differentiate between the trade-distorting nature of different types of support; the disproportionate benefits accruing to the strongest exporters and the limited benefits accruing to developing countries; the formula used for tariff reductions, with the EU favouring the Uruguay Round formula, with across-the-board reductions; the insufficient emphasis on full access for LDC exports to OECD markets; the extent of loopholes on export credits and bogus food aid; the failure to address non-trade concerns; the absence of a peace clause. | en |
| dcterms.isPartOf | Agritrade | en |
| dcterms.issued | 2003 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.publisher | Technical Centre for Agricultural and Rural Cooperation | |
| dcterms.type | News Item |