Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence
| cg.authorship.types | CGIAR single centre | |
| cg.contributor.crp | Policies, Institutions, and Markets | |
| cg.contributor.crp | Agriculture for Nutrition and Health | |
| cg.contributor.donor | Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | |
| cg.contributor.donor | Department for International Development, United Kingdom | |
| cg.creator.identifier | Ruth Meinzen-Dick: 0000-0003-4782-3074 | |
| cg.creator.identifier | Agnes Quisumbing: 0000-0002-5429-1857 | |
| cg.creator.identifier | Sophie Theis: 0000-0003-4277-7080 | |
| cg.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.009 | |
| cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Environment and Production Technology Division | |
| cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division | |
| cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Gender, Agriculture, and Assets Project (GAAP) | |
| cg.identifier.publicationRank | A | |
| cg.isijournal | ISI Journal | |
| cg.issn | 0308-521X | |
| cg.issue | June 2019 | |
| cg.journal | Agricultural Systems | |
| cg.reviewStatus | Peer Review | |
| cg.volume | 172 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth S. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Quisumbing, Agnes R. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Doss, Cheryl | |
| dc.contributor.author | Theis, Sophie | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-21T09:05:53Z | en |
| dc.date.available | 2024-06-21T09:05:53Z | en |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/146122 | |
| dc.title | Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence | en |
| dcterms.abstract | This paper reviews the literature on women’s land rights (WLR) and poverty reduction. It uses the Gender, Agriculture and Assets Project (GAAP) conceptual framework to identify pathways by which WLR could reduce poverty and increase wellbeing of women and their households in rural areas. It uses a systematic review search methodology to identify papers for inclusion, but adopts a more synthetic approach to assess the level of agreement and the amount of evidence within this literature. The paper examines the evidence from qualitative as well as quantitative studies on each of these pathways. Owing to the scarcity of experimental studies, the review of empirical work is based mostly on observational studies. We find some evidence on these relationships, but many of the key pathways have not been empirically analyzed. The evidence is strong for relationships between WLR and bargaining power and decision-making on consumption, human capital investment, and intergenerational transfers. There is a high level of agreement, but weaker evidence on the relationship between WLR and natural resource management, government services and institutions, empowerment and domestic violence, resilience and HIV risk, and consumption and food security. There is less agreement and insufficient evidence on the associations between WLR and other livelihoods, and a higher level of agreement, but still limited evidence on associations between WLR and credit, technology adoption, and agricultural productivity. Notably, we find no papers that directly investigate the link between WLR and poverty. Many gaps in the evidence arise from a failure to account for the complexity of land rights regimes, the measurement of land rights at the household level, the lack of attention paid to gender roles, and the lack of studies from countries outside Africa. Many studies are limited by small sample sizes, the lack of credible counterfactuals, lack of attention to endogeneity and selection bias, and possible response bias on questions of domestic violence and empowerment. There are very few rigorous evaluations of reforms that strengthened WLR. The paper concludes that gaps in the evidence should not deter the careful design and implementation of programs and policies to strengthen WLR, given the ongoing land tenure reforms in many countries. Different modalities and mechanisms for strengthening WLR could be tested, with appropriate counterfactuals. Program designers and evaluators can strategically identify pathways and outcomes where evidence gaps exist, and deliberately design studies to close those gaps. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela; Quisumbing, Agnes R.; Doss, Cheryl; and Theis, Sophie. 2019. Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and review of available evidence. Agricultural Systems 172(June 2019): 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.009 | en |
| dcterms.extent | 72-82 | |
| dcterms.issued | 2019-06 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.license | CC-BY-NC-ND-4.0 | |
| dcterms.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dcterms.relation | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/148647 | en |
| dcterms.relation | https://doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.134876 | en |
| dcterms.relation | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105080 | en |
| dcterms.replaces | https://ebrary.ifpri.org/digital/collection/p15738coll5/id/6008 | |
| dcterms.subject | gender | en |
| dcterms.subject | natural resources management | en |
| dcterms.subject | empowerment | en |
| dcterms.subject | innovation adoption | en |
| dcterms.subject | food security | en |
| dcterms.subject | land rights | en |
| dcterms.subject | agricultural productivity | en |
| dcterms.subject | public services | en |
| dcterms.subject | bargaining power | en |
| dcterms.subject | poverty | en |
| dcterms.subject | rural areas | en |
| dcterms.subject | credit | en |
| dcterms.subject | resilience | en |
| dcterms.subject | women | en |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article |