Routine growth monitoring processes in nutrition programs in India have multiple falter points with implications for quality of care
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Bajaj, Sumati; Avula, Rasmi; Pant, Anjali; Nguyen, Phuong Hong; Ruel, Marie T.; and Menon, Purnima. 2020. Routine growth monitoring processes in nutrition programs in India have multiple falter points with implications for quality of care. Current Developments in Nutrition 4(Supplement 2): 806. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzaa053_011
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
Abstract/Description
Growth monitoring (GM) and promotion is a routine part of primary healthcare for children in >80% of countries. In India, 57.5 million children are measured every month by frontline workers to assess their growth and to trigger preventive or curative services. Standard guidance for anthropometry suggests that quality can be compromised by the choice of measurement equipment, placement of equipment, and positioning of children during measurement. Little is known about the quality of measurement processes during GM. We compared child height and weight measurement processes with standards for anthropometry to assess GM quality.
Author ORCID identifiers
Phuong H Nguyen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3418-1674
Marie Ruel https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9506-348X
Purnima Menon https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5988-2894
Sumati Bajaj https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8255-7181
Anjali Pant https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-7146
