Incentives and disincentives of adopting wooden crate paper lining: A field experiment with traders and retailers in Tanzania

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date Issued

Date Online

Language

en
Type

Review Status

Internal Review

Access Rights

Open Access Open Access

Usage Rights

CC-BY-4.0

Share

Citation

Mwambi, Mercy; Mvungi, Henry; Ernest, Zablon; Termeet, Emma; and Dijkxhoorn, Youri. 2024. Incentives and disincentives of adopting wooden crate paper lining: A field experiment with traders and retailers in Tanzania. FRESH Initiative Brief October 2024. CGIAR System Organization.

Permanent link to cite or share this item

External link to download this item

DOI

Abstract/Description

Key Findings / Background • Tomato value chains have high postharvest losses, making the crop expensive to consumers • This study shows that the use of paper lining in tomato crates reduces postharvest losses • The high cost of paper lining is a disincentive to wider adoption of the technology • While value chain actors want to reduce postharvest losses, more evidence is needed on what works best

Countries
Organizations Affiliated to the Authors
Investors/sponsors
CGIAR Action Areas