Designing and evaluating social safety nets: theory, evidence, and policy conclusions
Authors
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Coady, David. 2004. Designing and evaluating social safety nets: theory, evidence, and policy conclusions. FCND Discussion Paper 172. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/156364
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
DOI
Abstract/Description
This paper reviews the literature on the performance of commonly found social safety net programs in developing countries. The evidence suggests that universal food subsidies have very limited potential for redistributing income. While targeted food subsidies have greater potential, this can only be realized when adequate attention is given to the design and implementation, as well as to the social and political factors influencing the adoption, of these programs. Although well-designed public works programs have impressive targeting performance, they have large non-wage costs; thus, to be cost-effective, they need to produce outputs that are especially beneficial to poor households. Social funds, which emphasize both community involvement and asset creation, have been cost-effective, but they are difficult to target to extremely poor households. Traditional public works programs are particularly attractive for addressing vulnerability, but they require flexibility regarding choice of output. Targeted human capital subsidies appear to have great potential for addressing extreme poverty; but again, their design needs to reflect the human capital profile of countries and the administrative capability of the government. -- Author's Abstract
