Institutional options for managing rangelands
Authors
Date Issued
Date Online
Language
Type
Review Status
Access Rights
Metadata
Full item pageCitation
Ngaido, Tidiane; McCarthy, Nancy. 2004. Institutional options for managing rangelands. 2020 Vision Focus Brief. 11(9). In Collective action and property rights for sustainable development. 2020 Vision Focus 11. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/157492
Permanent link to cite or share this item
External link to download this item
DOI
Abstract/Description
This brief considers the benefits and costs of alternative tenure and institutional arrangements and the impact of existing legal and policy frameworks on the sustainability and equity of pastoral production systems under three categories of landownership: (1) state ownership; (2) individual ownership; and (3) common property... Achieving efficient, equitable, and sustainable rangeland management depends on the costs and benefits of alternative systems. These costs and benefits, in turn, depend on agroecological, sociocultural, and economic characteristics. The conservation and management of rangelands require not only tenure security, but also an understanding of local livestock production and risk management strategies and factors that promote collective action, which can then be integrated into national policy formulation strategies and project designs. -- from Text.
