Lessons from forestry decentralisation

cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/2909
cg.isbn978-6-02-869303-5
cg.subject.ciforCLIMATE CHANGE
dc.contributor.authorLarson, A.M.
dc.contributor.authorRibot, J.C.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T09:13:14Zen
dc.date.available2012-06-04T09:13:14Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/20288
dc.titleLessons from forestry decentralisationen
dcterms.abstractREDD+ is more likely to be just and locally legitimate if the design, implementation and allocation of benefits represent local needs and aspirations. Decentralisation of meaningful decisions to locally accountable and responsive (e.g., representative) local authorities would promote local engagement in REDD+ decision making. The level at which rules are made and benefits distributed will be a key issue in the legitimacy, effectiveness, efficiency and equity of REDD+.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationLarson, A.M., Ribot, J.C. 2009. Lessons from forestry decentralisation . In: Angelsen, A. with Brockhaus, M., Kanninen, M., Sills, E., Sunderlin, W. D. and Wertz-Kanounnikoff, S. (eds).. Realising REDD+: National strategy and policy options. :175-190. Bogor, Indonesia, Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). ISBN: 978-6-02-869303-5..en
dcterms.issued2009
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherCenter for International Forestry Research
dcterms.subjectclimate changeen
dcterms.subjectdecentralizationen
dcterms.subjectgovernanceen
dcterms.subjectforest managementen
dcterms.typeBook Chapter

Files