Moving to local control of woodland resources - Can CAMPFIRE go beyond the mega-fauna?

Simple item page
cg.creator.identifierBruce M Campbell: 0000-0002-0123-4859
cg.identifier.urlhttps://www.cifor-icraf.org/knowledge/publication/696
cg.issn0894-1920
cg.journalSociety and Natural Resources
cg.subject.ciforFOREST GOVERNANCE AND COMMUNITY FORESTRY
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, Bruce M.
dc.contributor.authorByron, R.N.
dc.contributor.authorMadzudzo, Pauline H.E.
dc.contributor.authorMatose, F.
dc.contributor.authorWily, L.
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-04T09:06:11Zen
dc.date.available2012-06-04T09:06:11Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/18188
dc.titleMoving to local control of woodland resources - Can CAMPFIRE go beyond the mega-fauna?en
dcterms.abstractDevolution of authority over natural resource management is now well advanced for the mega-fauna in Zimbabwe, through the CAMPFIRE program. We ask whether models like CAMPFIRE can be applied to a broader spectrum of woodland resources. Problems in applying CAMPFIRE to woodland resources relate to a legal and policy framework that is not enabling to local management; weakened local institutional structures; a high of differentiation with respect to woodland resource use within communities; problems of defining resource user groups; and, the potentially low market value of woodland products. In identifying circumtances where CAMPFIRE may be applied succesfully to woodland resources, economic, sociological, and ecological circumtances must be considered.en
dcterms.bibliographicCitationCampbell, B.M., Byron, R.N., Madzudzo, Pauline H.E., Matose, F., Wily, L. 1999. Moving to local control of woodland resources - Can CAMPFIRE go beyond the mega-fauna? . Society and Natural Resources 12 (5) :501-509. ISSN: 0894-1920.en
dcterms.issued1999
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.subjectforest productsen
dcterms.subjectmarketsen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

Collections

CIFOR publications