Relative validity of interviewer-administered 24-hour recalls collected by telephone and in-person compared with weighed food records among rural Sri Lankan adults
| cg.authorship.types | CGIAR single centre | |
| cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and developing country institute | |
| cg.authorship.types | CGIAR and advanced research institute | |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | University of California | |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | Wayamba University of Sri Lanka | |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | United States Department of Agriculture | |
| cg.contributor.affiliation | International Food Policy Research Institute | |
| cg.contributor.donor | CGIAR Trust Fund | |
| cg.contributor.initiative | Fruit and Vegetables for Sustainable Healthy Diets | |
| cg.contributor.initiative | Resilient Cities | |
| cg.contributor.programAccelerator | Better Diets and Nutrition | |
| cg.coverage.country | Sri Lanka | |
| cg.coverage.region | Asia | |
| cg.coverage.region | Southern Asia | |
| cg.creator.identifier | Amy Margolies: 0000-0003-3194-5632 | |
| cg.creator.identifier | Deanna Olney: 0000-0002-2420-8565 | |
| cg.creator.identifier | Aulo Gelli: 0000-0003-4977-2549 | |
| cg.howPublished | Formally Published | |
| cg.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.107672 | |
| cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Nutrition, Diets, and Health Unit | |
| cg.identifier.project | IFPRI - Poverty, Gender, and Inclusion Unit | |
| cg.identifier.publicationRank | B | |
| cg.isijournal | ISI Journal | |
| cg.issn | 2475-2991 | |
| cg.issue | 4 | |
| cg.journal | Current Developments in Nutrition | |
| cg.reviewStatus | Peer Review | |
| cg.subject.impactArea | Nutrition, health and food security | |
| cg.subject.impactArea | Poverty reduction, livelihoods and jobs | |
| cg.volume | 10 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Joyce, Caroline A. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Stewart, Christine P. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Arnold, Charles D. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sitisekara, Hasara | |
| dc.contributor.author | Caswell, Bess L. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Hess, Sonja Y. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Margolies, Amy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ranatunga, Thilanka | |
| dc.contributor.author | Perera, Thushanthi | |
| dc.contributor.author | Olney, Deanna K. | |
| dc.contributor.author | Silva, Renuka | |
| dc.contributor.author | Gelli, Aulo | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-04-01T20:31:24Z | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/10568/182353 | |
| dc.title | Relative validity of interviewer-administered 24-hour recalls collected by telephone and in-person compared with weighed food records among rural Sri Lankan adults | en |
| dcterms.abstract | Background Quantitative dietary assessment is hindered by cost, time, and logistical burdens. Collecting 24-hour recall (24HR) dietary data by phone may be particularly advantageous in rural areas. Objectives To assess the criterion and relative validity and costs of phone compared with in-person 24HR compared with observed weighed food records (WFR), a reference measure for true intake. Methods We used a randomized crossover design to collect phone and in-person 24HRs from 103 rural Sri Lankan adults, each matched to a WFR collected on the reference day. Agreement was assessed using equivalence testing with 15% error bounds and concordance correlation coefficients. Memory and portion size estimation errors were examined using descriptive statistics. Activity-based costing was used to estimate 24HR costs using expenditures and micro-costing. Results Compared with WFR, respondents underreported energy intake by 263 kcal (12.6%) in phone 24HR and 229 kcal (10.9%) in in-person 24HR, primarily due to portion size misestimation. Mean intakes of protein and 6 micronutrients were equivalent between phone 24HR and WFR. Although no nutrients were equivalent for in-person recalls, the 2 recall methods had relative equivalence for energy, carbohydrates, fat, zinc, and niacin. The average concordance correlation coefficient was slightly higher for phone recalls, whereas memory error was lower for in-person recalls. Costs per respondent were $254 for in-person 24HR and $186 for phone 24HR in a most likely implementation scenario. Conclusions Among rural Sri Lankan adults, phone-based 24HR were comparable to in-person 24HR in estimating nutrient intakes, although both methods underestimated true intakes. Phone-based recalls were less expensive and performed at least as accurately as those collected in-person. | en |
| dcterms.accessRights | Open Access | |
| dcterms.audience | Academics | |
| dcterms.available | 2026-03-12 | |
| dcterms.bibliographicCitation | Joyce, Caroline A.; Stewart, Christine P.; Arnold, Charles D.; Sitisekara, Hasara; Caswell, Bess L.; et al. 2026. Relative validity of interviewer-administered 24-hour recalls collected by telephone and in-person compared with weighed food records among rural Sri Lankan adults. Current Developments in Nutrition 10(4): 107672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2026.107672 | |
| dcterms.extent | 107672 | |
| dcterms.issued | 2026-04 | |
| dcterms.language | en | |
| dcterms.license | CC-BY-4.0 | |
| dcterms.publisher | Elsevier | |
| dcterms.subject | surveys | |
| dcterms.subject | dietary assessment | |
| dcterms.subject | cost analysis | |
| dcterms.subject | rural areas | |
| dcterms.subject | survey methods | |
| dcterms.subject | nutrient intake | |
| dcterms.type | Journal Article |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.75 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description:
