Rwanda: Cost effective options for inclusive and sustainable development

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR single centre
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Institute
cg.contributor.donorUnited Arab Emirates
cg.contributor.donorGates Foundation
cg.contributor.donorCGIAR Trust Fund
cg.contributor.programAcceleratorPolicy Innovations
cg.coverage.countryRwanda
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.coverage.regionSub-Saharan Africa
cg.creator.identifierEmerta Aragie: 0000-0002-4982-9923
cg.creator.identifierJosue Niyonsingiza: 0009-0000-8364-7050
cg.creator.identifierJames Thurlow: 0000-0003-3414-374X
cg.creator.identifierJames Warner: 0000-0002-5768-3004
cg.howPublishedGrey Literature
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Foresight and Policy Modeling Unit
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Development Strategies and Governance Unit
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Agrifood Investment Prioritization
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Rural Investment and Policy Analysis (RIAPA) data and modeling system
cg.identifier.publicationRankNot ranked
cg.number2
cg.placeWashington, DC
cg.reviewStatusInternal Review
cg.subject.impactAreaNutrition, health and food security
dc.contributor.authorAragie, Emerta A.
dc.contributor.authorNiyonsingiza, Josue
dc.contributor.authorThurlow, James
dc.contributor.authorWarner, James
dc.contributor.authorXu, Valencia Wenqian
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-07T15:12:40Zen
dc.date.available2025-05-07T15:12:40Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/174468
dc.titleRwanda: Cost effective options for inclusive and sustainable developmenten
dcterms.abstractIn this policy brief, we present research findings of a systematic evaluation and ranking of investment options for Rwanda’s agrifood system based on their cost-effectiveness in achieving multiple devel opment outcomes, including agrifood gross domestic product (GDP) growth, agrifood job creation, poverty reduction, declining rates of undernourishment, and lowering diet deprivation. Additionally, the study assesses their environmental footprint, focusing on water consumption, land use, and emissions. Investments in small and medium enterprise (SME) processors are shown to be the most cost-effective at expanding agrifood GDP and employment, while extension and advisory services on livestock and climate emerge as the most efficient farmer-facing investments. However, crop ex tension services rank least in cost-effectiveness for economic and social outcomes. However, many cost-effective investments have relatively high environmental footprints, which highlights potential tradeoffs. The study further reveals shifts in the cost-effectiveness ranking of investment options overtime and when extreme production shocks occur.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.audienceDevelopment Practitioners
dcterms.bibliographicCitationAragie, Emerta; Niyonsingiza, Josue; Thurlow, James; Warner, James; and Xu, Valencia Wenqian. 2025. Rwanda: Cost effective options for inclusive and sustainable development. Agrifood Investment Prioritization Country Series Brief 2. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/174468en
dcterms.extent24 p.
dcterms.isPartOfAgrifood Investment Prioritization Country Series Briefen
dcterms.issued2025-05-07
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseCC-BY-4.0
dcterms.publisherInternational Food Policy Research Institute
dcterms.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/174466en
dcterms.relationhttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/174467en
dcterms.subjectagrifood sectoren
dcterms.subjectsustainable developmenten
dcterms.subjectpovertyen
dcterms.subjectnutritionen
dcterms.subjectenvironmental impacten
dcterms.typeBrief

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AgrifoodInvestment - Rwanda.pdf
Size:
468.91 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Brief

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: