Institutional linkages and landscape governance systems: The case of Mt. Marsabit, Kenya

Simple item page
cg.authorship.typesCGIAR and developing country institute
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Livestock Research Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationKenya Forestry Research Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationForest Society of Kenya
cg.contributor.crpDryland Systems
cg.contributor.crpLivestock
cg.contributor.donorSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Canada
cg.coverage.countryKenya
cg.coverage.iso3166-alpha2KE
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.coverage.regionEastern Africa
cg.creator.identifierLance W. Robinson: 0000-0002-5224-8644
cg.howPublishedFormally Published
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.5751/es-09933-230127
cg.isijournalISI Journal
cg.issn1708-3087
cg.issue1
cg.journalEcology and Society
cg.reviewStatusPeer Review
cg.subject.ilriNRM
cg.subject.ilriRESEARCH
cg.volume23
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, Lance W.
dc.contributor.authorKagombe, J.K.
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-15T08:28:34Zen
dc.date.available2018-03-15T08:28:34Zen
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/91683
dc.titleInstitutional linkages and landscape governance systems: The case of Mt. Marsabit, Kenyaen
dcterms.abstractThe desire to overcome fragmented management of the natural ecosystems on which human beings depend has contributed to a growing interest in landscape approaches and to deeper questions about landscape governance systems. We assessed the emergent governance system that corresponds to the Mt. Marsabit landscape ecosystem in northern Kenya, applying a framework that includes 17 different indicators. We found that in this governance system, the most important spaces where coordination and joint planning took place were district level coordination committees, within which representation of communities and voices from the grassroots was poor. Institutional and organizational linkages were such that those parts of the governance system for which legitimacy and accountability were strongest were the parts for which ability to generate resources was weakest, while the parts of the governance system that had the best access to resources was where accountability was weakest or the most indirect. In this paper we use the Mt. Marsabit case study to explore the role that organizational and institutional linkages play in the strengths and weaknesses of landscape governance systems, and consider the implications for governance design at landscape level. Institutional linkages play a critical role in determining how landscape governance systems function across scales and levels, and their degree of fit. Appropriate linkages can help to create connections among key dimensions of effective governance within the system, dimensions such as use of knowledge, capacity to generate resources, fit, learning, legitimacy, accountability, and responsiveness, strengthening the system as a whole. Of the various linkages that characterize a governance system, it is those that give community-level actors a meaningful voice at higher levels and in spaces where key decisions are being made that are most critical for enabling effective landscape governance.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.audienceScientists
dcterms.available2018
dcterms.bibliographicCitationRobinson, L.W. and Kagombe, J.K. 2018. Institutional linkages and landscape governance systems: The case of Mt. Marsabit, Kenya. Ecology and Society 23(1): 27en
dcterms.issued2018
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.publisherResilience Alliance, Inc.
dcterms.subjectlandscapeen
dcterms.subjectgovernanceen
dcterms.typeJournal Article

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

ILRI articles in journals
CRP Livestock journal articles
CRP Livestock Kenya
ILRI sustainable livestock systems program outputs (2017–2024)