Lessons Learned from Implementing the CAADP Biennial Review Process Under the Malabo Declaration

cg.authorship.typesCGIAR multi-centre
cg.contributor.affiliationAKADEMIYA2063
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Food Policy Research Institute
cg.contributor.affiliationInternational Water Management Institute
cg.contributor.donorAfrican Development Bank
cg.contributor.donorGates Foundation
cg.contributor.donorGerman Corporation for International Cooperation
cg.contributor.donorInternational Fund for Agricultural Development
cg.contributor.donorMasterCard Foundation
cg.coverage.regionAfrica
cg.creator.identifierTsitsi Makombe: 0000-0001-5297-7428
cg.creator.identifierJohn Ulimwengu: 0000-0002-8905-0201
cg.creator.identifierGreenwell Matchaya: 0000-0003-3035-1648
cg.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.54067/kpbs.04
cg.identifier.iwmilibraryH053933
cg.identifier.projectIWMI - D-0569
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Development Strategies and Governance Unit
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - African Growth and Development Policy Modeling Consortium (AGRODEP)
cg.identifier.projectIFPRI - Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support System (ReSAKSS)
cg.identifier.urlhttps://akademiya2063.org/publications/kampala_policy_brief/Kampala%20Policy%20Brief%20Series%20No.4.pdf
cg.number04
cg.placeKigali, Rwanda
dc.contributor.authorMakombe, T.
dc.contributor.authorUlimwengu, John M.
dc.contributor.authorMatchaya, Greenwell C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-11T04:45:41Z
dc.date.available2025-07-11T04:45:41Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10568/175608
dc.titleLessons Learned from Implementing the CAADP Biennial Review Process Under the Malabo Declarationen
dcterms.abstractThe Biennial Review (BR), launched under the 2014 Malabo Declaration, serves as the African Union's (AU) primary mutual accountability tool for tracking Member States' progress in implementing the Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP). This brief, drawing lessons from four BR cycles, aims to inform the next phase of BRs in preparation for the domestication and implementation of the 2025 Kampala CAADP Declaration. While the BR has prompted policy and programmatic changes in several countries, its full impact is hindered by persistent challenges such as underfunding, weak monitoring and evaluation (M&E) capacities, and data quality issues. Despite these hurdles, innovations like the eBR and national data clusters have led to improvements in data quality and reporting rates. Still further improvements in data systems, capacities, and stakeholder engagement are urgently needed to strengthen the Biennial Review (BR) process. Key recommendations include adopting coherent data governance policies, promoting BR awareness and data utilization, refining the BR scorecard methodology, expanding data clusters to more countries, strengthening M&E capacities, ensuring inclusive BR validation, and integrating the BR database with M&E systems at both national and regional levels. Sustained political leadership, technical support, and domestic funding are critical to institutionalizing a robust, timely, high-quality, and impactful BR process that supports evidence-based decision-making and accelerates progress toward achieving the CAADP agrifood system transformation goals under the Kampala Declaration.en
dcterms.accessRightsOpen Access
dcterms.bibliographicCitationMakombe, T.; Ulimwengu, John M.; Matchaya, Greenwell. 2025. Lessons Learned from Implementing the CAADP Biennial Review Process Under the Malabo Declaration. Kigali, Rwanda: AKADEMIYA2063. 16p. (Kampala Policy Brief Series 04). doi: https://doi.org/10.54067/kpbs.04
dcterms.extent16p.
dcterms.isPartOfKampala Policy Brief Series
dcterms.issued2025-07-01
dcterms.languageen
dcterms.licenseOther
dcterms.publisherAKADEMIYA2063
dcterms.subjectagricultural development
dcterms.subjectdata quality
dcterms.subjectstakeholders
dcterms.subjectmonitoring and evaluation
dcterms.subjectagrifood systems
dcterms.typeBrief

Files

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: